Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study
1
6/20/2022
5 6
7 8
2
6/20/2022
9 10
3
6/20/2022
13 14
=3.17 years
15 16
4
6/20/2022
years
19 20
5
6/20/2022
Example: Payback Period with discount factor Example: Payback Period with discount factor
Cash flow description Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
solution
Development cost (418,040)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Operation and Maintenance
Cash flow-alt A -5000 500 1000 1000 1500 2500 cost (15,045) (16,000) (17,000) (18,000) (19,000) (20,000)
Discount factor 1 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567
Discount factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567 0.507
Discounted -5000 446 797 712 954 1417
cashflow
Time-adjusted costs -418040 -13435.19 -12752 -12104 -11448 -10773 -10140
Cumulative cash -5000 -4554 -3757 -3045 -2091 -674
flow
cumulative time adjusted cost -418040 -431475 -444227 -456331 -467779 -478552 -488692
Cash flow alt B -2000 500 1500 1500 1500 1500
benefits derived from
Discount factor 1 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567 operation of new project - 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000
Discounted -2000 446 1195 1068 954 850
cashflow Discount factor (12%) 1.000 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567 0.507
Cumulative cash -2000 -1554 -359 709 1663 2513
Time -adjusted benefits 0 133950 135490 135280 133560 130410 126750
flow
cumulative time adjusted
benefits 0 133950 269440 404720 538280 668690 795440
cumulative time adjusted cost
+ benefits -418040 -297525 -174787 -51611 70501 190138 306748
21 22
23 24
6
6/20/2022
26
$943.39
Note that
totals are
equal, but
NPVs are
not because
of the time
value of
money
27
7
6/20/2022
Return On Investment
Discount Rate 10%
Return on Investment
Return on investment (ROI) is calculated by
Project 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTAL
Benefits 0 2000 3000 4000 5000 14000
subtracting the project costs from the benefits and then
0.90909091 0.826446 0.751315 0.683013 0.620921 dividing by the costs
0 1652.893 2253.944 2732.054 3104.607 9743.497 ROI = (total discounted benefits - total discounted costs)
Costs 5000 1000 1000 1000 1000 9000
0.90909091 0.826446 0.751315 0.683013 0.620921
/ discounted costs
4545.45455 826.4463 751.3148 683.0135 620.9213 7427.15 The higher the ROI, the better
Cashflow -5000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
NPV $2,316.35
Many organizations have a required rate of return or
minimum acceptable rate of return on investment for
projects
Project 2 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTAL
Benefits 1000 2000 4000 4000 4000 15000 Internal rate of return (IRR) can by calculated by
0.90909091 0.826446 0.751315 0.683013 0.620921 finding the discount rate that makes the NPV of all cash
909.090909 1652.893 3005.259 2732.054 2483.685 10782.98 flows equal to zero
Costs 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 10000
0.90909091 0.826446 0.751315 0.683013 0.620921
1818.18182 1652.893 1502.63 1366.027 1241.843 7581.574
Cashflow -1000 0 2000 2000 2000 5000
NPV $3,201.41
30
Schedule feasibility
Return On Investment How long will it take to get the technical expertise?
We may have the technology, but that doesn’t mean we
(Discounte d Benefits - Discounted Costs) have the skills required to properly apply that technology
ROI May need to hire new people or re-train existing staff
Discounted Costs Whether hiring or training, it will impact schedule
Asses the schedule risk
Given our technical expertise, are the project deadlines
Project 2 desirable?
Project 1
If there are specific deadlines, are they mandatory or
(9743 7427) (10783 7582) desirable?
ROI ROI If the deadlines are not mandatory, the analyst can propose
7427 7582 several alternative schedules
ROI 31% ROI 42% What are the real constraints on project deadlines?
If the project overruns, what are the consequences?
Missed schedules are bad, but inadequate systems are
worse!
32
8
6/20/2022
Comparing Alternatives
How do we compare alternatives?
When there are multiple selection criteria?
When none of the alternatives is superior across the board?
Use a Feasibility Analysis Matrix!
The columns correspond to the candidate solutions;
The rows correspond to the feasibility criteria;
The cells contain the feasibility assessment notes for each candidate
Each row can be assigned a rank or score for each criterion
e.g., for operational feasibility, candidates can be ranked 1, 2, 3,
etc.
A final ranking or score is recorded in the last row.
36
9
6/20/2022
Feasibility Report
1. Purpose and the scope of the study 5. Possible alternatives
Objectives of the study
• ….including ‘do nothing’
Who commissioned it and who
did it 6. Criteria for comparison
Sources of information • Definitions for criteria
Process used for the study 7. Analysis of alternatives
How long did it take
• Description of each alternative
2. Description of present situation
Organizational settings, current
• Evaluation with respect to
systems criteria
Related factors and constraints • Cost/benefits analysis and
3. Problems and requirements special implications
What’s wrong with the present 8. Recommendations
situation • What is recommended and
What changes are needed implications
4. Objectives of the new project • What to do next
Goals and relationship between
them 9. Appendices
• To include any supporting
materials
37
10