UTS Module
UTS Module
This module will introduce you to the basic concepts of self and
personality, and how they are related with each other. Self and personality
characterized the way we define our existence, also these refers on how we organized
our experiences that are reflected to our behavior. On the other hand, people have different ideas about
themselves. These ideas represent the self of the person. Moreover, we behave in different ways in a given
situation, but people also behave fairly stable in different circumstances. The relatively permanent pattern
of behavior represents personality of the person. In details,
Personality
• The etymological derivative of personality comes from the word “persona”, the theatrical masks
worn by Romans in Greek and Latin drama. Personality also comes from the two Latin words “per”
and “sonare”, which literally means “to sound through”.
• Personality have no single definition since different personality theories have different views on
how to define it. However, the commonly accepted definition of personality is that it is a relatively
permanent traits and unique characteristics that give both consistency and individuality to a
person’s behavior (Roberts & Mroczek, 2008).
• Personality plays a key role in affecting how people shape their lives. It involves the complex
relationship of people with their environment, how they cope and adjust through life, and how they
respond to demands of physical and social challenges.
• Personality is the overall pattern or integration of a person’s structure, modes of behavior, attitudes,
aptitudes, interests, intellectual abilities, and many other distinguishable personality traits.
Personality is the conglomeration of the following components: physical self, intelligence,
character traits, attitudes, habits, interest, personal discipline, moral values, principles and
philosophies of life.
Determinants of Personality
Personality refers to the total person in his/her overt and covert behavior. The determinants of factors
of personality are as follows:
• Situational Factors of Personality. Although these factors do not literally create and shape up an
individual’s personality, situational factors do alter a person’s behavior and response from time to
time. The situational factors can be commonly observed when a person behaves contrastingly and
exhibits different traits and characteristics.
Personality Traits
Personality traits reflect people’s characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Personality traits imply consistency and stability—someone who scores high on a specific trait like
Extraversion is expected to be sociable in different situations and over time. Thus, trait psychology rests on
the idea that people differ from one another in terms of where they stand on a set of basic trait dimensions
that persist over time and across situations.
The most widely used system of traits is called the Five-Factor Model. This system includes five
broad traits that can be remembered with the acronym OCEAN: Openness, Conscientiousness,
Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. Each of the major traits from the Big Five can be divided
into facets to give a more fine-grained analysis of someone's personality. In addition, some trait theorists
argue that there are other traits that cannot be completely captured by the Five-Factor Model. Critics of the
trait concept argue that people do not act consistently from one situation to the next and that people are
very influenced by situational forces. Thus, one major debate in the field concerns the relative power of
people’s traits versus the situations in which they find themselves as predictors of their behavior.
Research that used the lexical approach showed that many of the personality descriptors found in
the dictionary do indeed overlap. In other words, many of the words that we use to describe people are
synonyms. Thus, if we want to know what a person is like, we do not necessarily need to ask how sociable
they are, how friendly they are, and how gregarious they are. Instead, because sociable people tend to be
friendly and gregarious, we can summarize this personality dimension with a single term. Someone who is
sociable, friendly, and gregarious would typically be described as an “Extravert.” Once we know she is an
extravert, we can assume that she is sociable, friendly, and gregarious.
The most widely accepted system to emerge from this approach was “The Big Five” or “FiveFactor
Model” (Goldberg, 1990; McCrae & John, 1992; McCrae & Costa, 1987). The Big Five comprises five
major traits shown in the Figure 2 below. A way to remember these five is with the acronym OCEAN (O
is for Openness; C is for Conscientiousness; E is for Extraversion; A is for Agreeableness; N is for
Neuroticism). The table below provides descriptions of people who would score high and low on each of
these traits.
Traits are important and interesting because they describe stable patterns of behavior that persist
for long periods of time (Caspi, Roberts, & Shiner, 2005). Importantly, these stable patterns can have
broadranging consequences for many areas of our life (Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007).
For instance, think about the factors that determine success in college. If you were asked to guess what
factors predict good grades in college, you might guess something like intelligence. This guess would be
correct, but we know much more about who is likely to do well. Specifically, personality researchers have
also found the personality traits like Conscientiousness play an important role in college and beyond,
probably because highly conscientious individuals study hard, get their work done on time, and are less
distracted by nonessential activities that take time away from school work. In addition, highly conscientious
people are often healthier than people low in conscientiousness because they are more likely to maintain
healthy diets, to exercise, and to follow basic safety procedures like wearing seat belts or bicycle helmets.
Over the long term, this consistent pattern of behaviors can add up to meaningful differences in health and
longevity. Thus, personality traits are not just a useful way to describe people you know; they actually help
psychologists predict how good a worker someone will be, how long he or she will live, and the types of
jobs and activities the person will enjoy.
Who Am I?
Have you ever ask yourself the question, “Who am I?”? Answering the question 'Who am I?' can
lead to a solid self-concept and self-understanding. For many people, answering this question isn't very
easy. For others, a solid understanding of who they are is a big part of their lives. Understanding of who
you are as a person is called self-concept and understanding what your motives are when you act is called
self-understanding.
Self-concept tends to be more malleable when people are younger and still going through the
process of self-discovery and identity formation. As people age, self-perceptions become much more
detailed and organized as people form a better idea of who they are and what is important to them.
According to the book Essential Social Psychology by Richard Crisp and Rhiannon Turner:
• The individual self consists of attributes and personality traits that differentiate us from other
individuals. Examples include introversion or extroversion.
• The relational self is defined by our relationships with significant others. Examples include siblings,
friends, and spouses.
• The collective self reflects our membership in social groups. Examples include British, Republican,
African-American, or gay.
At its most basic, self-concept is a collection of beliefs one holds about oneself and the responses
of others. It embodies the answer to the question "Who am I?". The lesson to follow will facilitate learning
about the self, and self concept.
LESSON 2: THE SELF ACCORDING TO PHILOSOPHY
Philosophy
Various thinkers for centuries tried to explain the natural causes of everything
that exist specifically the inquiry on the self preoccupied these philosophers in the
history. The Greek philosophers were the ones who seriously questioned myths
and moved away from them in attempting to understand reality by exercising the art of questioning that
satisfies their curiosity, including the questions about self. The following lecture will present the different
philosophical perspectives and views about self.
Socrates
A philosopher from Athens, Greece and said to have the greatest influence
on European thought.
According to the history he was not able to write any of his teachings and
life’s account instead, he is known from the writings of his student Plato who
became one of the greatest philosophers of his time. Socrates had a unique
style of asking questions called Socratic Method.
Socratic Method or dialectic method involves the search for the
correct/proper definition of a thing. In this method, Socrates did not lecture,
he instead would ask questions and engage the person in a discussion. He
would begin by acting as if he did not know anything and would get the other person to clarify
their ideas and resolve logical inconsistencies (Price, 2000).
The foundation of Socrates philosophy was the Delphic Oracle’s that command to “Know Thyself”.
Here, Socrates would like to emphasize that knowing or understanding oneself should be more than
the physical self, or the body.
According to Socrates, self is dichotomous which means composed of two things: The physical
realm or the one that is changeable, temporal, and imperfect. The best example of the physical
realm is the physical world. The physical world is consisting of anything we sense – see, smell,
feel, hear, and taste. It is always changing and deteriorating. The ideal realm is the one that is
imperfect and unchanging, eternal, and immortal. This includes the intellectual essences of the
universe like the concept of beauty, truth, and goodness. Moreover, the ideal realm is also present
in the physical world. One may define someone as beautiful or truthful, but their definition is
limited and imperfect for it is always relative and subjective. It is only the ideal forms themselves
that are perfect, unchanging, and eternal.
For Socrates, a human is composed of body and soul, the first belongs to the physical realm because
it changed, it is imperfect, and it dies, and the latter belongs to ideal realm for it survives the death.
Socrates also used the term soul to identify self.
The self, according to Socrates is the immortal and unified entity that is consistent over time. For
example, a human being remains the same person during their childhood to adulthood given the
fact that they undergone developmental changes throughout their lifespan.
•
Plato
• A student of Socrates, who introduced the idea of a
threepart soul/self that is composed of reason, physical appetite
and spirit or passion.
o The Reason enables human to think deeply, make wise
choices and achieve a true understanding of eternal truths.
Plato also called this as divine essence.
o The physical Appetite is the basic biological needs of
human being such as hunger, thirst, and sexual desire. o And
the spirit or passion is the basic emotions of human being such
as love, anger, ambition, aggressiveness and empathy.
• These three elements of the self works in every individual
Image Source: https://www.alamy.com/plato inconsistently. According to Plato, it is always the responsibility
of the reason to organize, control, and reestablish harmonious
relationship between these three elements.
• Plato also illustrated his view of the soul/self in “Phaedrus” in his metaphor: the
soul is like a winged chariot drawn by two powerful horses: a white horse,
representing Spirit, and a black horse, embodying appetite. The charioteer is
reason, whose task is to guide the chariot to the eternal realm by controlling the
two independent-minded horses. Those charioteers who are successful in setting a
true course and ensuring that the two steeds work together in harmonious unity
achieve true wisdom and banquet with the gods. However, those charioteers who
are unable to control their horses and keep their chariot on track are destined to
experience personal, intellectual, and spiritual failure.
St. Augustine
• He is considered as the last of the great ancient
philosophers whose ideas were greatly Platonic. In melding
philosophy and religious beliefs together, Augustine has been
characterized as Christianity’s first theologian.
• Like Plato, Augustine believed that the physical body is
different from the immortal soul. Early in his philosophical
development he described body as “snare” or “cage” of the soul
and said that the body is a “slave” of the soul he even
characterized that “the soul makes war with the body”. Later on
he came to view the body as “spouse” of the soul, with both
attached to one another by a “natural appetite.” He concluded,
“That the body is united with the soul, so that man may be entire
and complete, is a fact we recognize on the evidence of our own
nature.”
Image Source: http://lexchristianorum.blogspot.com/ According to St. Augustine, the human nature is
composed of two realms:
1. God as the source of all reality and truth. Through mystical experience, man is capable
of knowing eternal truths. This is made possible through the existence of the one eternal
truth which is God. He further added that without God as the source of all truth, man
could never understand eternal truth. This relationship with God means that those who
know most about God will come closest to understanding the true nature of the world.
2. The sinfulness of man. The cause of sin or evil is an act of mans’ freewill. Moral goodness
can only be achieved through the grace of God.
He also stated that real happiness can only be found in God. For God is love and he created humans
for them to also love. Problems arise because of the objects humans choose to love. Disordered
love results when man loves the wrong things which he believes will give him happiness.
Furthermore, he said that if man loves God first and everything else to a lesser degree, then all
will fall into its rightful place.
Rene Descartes
A French philosopher, mathematician, and considered the founder
of modern philosophy.
Descartes, famous principle the “cogito, ergo sum—“I think,
therefore I exist” established his philosophical views on “true
knowledge” and concept of self.
He explained that in order to gain true knowledge, one must doubt
everything even own existence. Doubting makes someone aware that
they are thinking being thus, they exist. The essence of existing as a
human identity is the possibility of being aware of our selves: being self-
conscious in this way is integral to having a personal identity.
Conversely, it would be impossible to be self-conscious if we did not
have a personal identity of which to be conscious. In other words, the
essence of self is being a thinking thing.
The self is a dynamic entity that engages in metal operations – thinking, reasoning, and perceiving
processes. In addition to this, self-identity is dependent on the awareness in engaging with those
mental operations.
He declared that the essential self or the self as the thinking entity is radically different from the
physical body. The thinking self or soul is a non-material, immortal, conscious being, independent
of the physical laws of the universe while the physical body is a material, mortal, non-thinking
entity, fully governed by the physical laws of nature.
He also maintained that the soul and the body are independent of one another and each can exist
and function without the other. In cases in which people are sleeping or comatose, their bodies
continue to function even though their minds are not thinking, much like the mechanisms of a clock.
He identified the physical self as part of nature, governed by the physical laws of the universe, and
available to scientific analysis and experimentation, and the conscious self (mind, soul) is a part of
the spiritual realm, independent of the physical laws of the universe, governed only by the laws of
reason and God’s will. And because it exists outside of the natural world of cause-and-effect, the
conscious self is able to exercise free will in the choices it makes.
John Locke
• An English philosopher and physician and famous in his
concept of “Tabula Rasa” or Blank Slate that assumes the
nurture side of human development.
David Hume
•
He was a Scottish philosopher and also an empiricist.
•
His claim about self is quite controversial because he assumed that there
is no self! In his essay entitled, “On Personal Identity” (1739) he said
that, if we carefully examine the contents of [our] experience, we find
that there are only two distinct entities, "impressions" and "ideas".
• Impressions are the basic sensations of our experience, the elemental
data of our minds: pain, pleasure, heat, cold, happiness, grief, fear,
exhilaration, and so on.
• On the other hand, ideas are copies of impressions that include thoughts
and images that are built up from our primary impressions through a
variety of relationships, but because they are derivative copies of
impressions, they are once removed from reality. Image Source: https://www.britannica.com/
• Hume considered that the self does not exist because all of the
experiences that a person may have are just perceptions
and this includes the perception of self. None of these perceptions resemble a
unified and permanent self-identity that exists over time.
• He further added that there are instances that an individual is limited in
experiencing their perception like in sleeping. Similarly, when someone
died all empirical senses end and according to him, it makes no sense to
believe that self exists in other forms. As an empiricist, Hume provide
an honest description and analysis of his own experience, within which
there is no self to be found.
• Hume explained that the self that is being experienced by an individual
is nothing but a kind of fictional self. Human created an imaginary
creature which is not real. “Fictional self” is created to unify the mental
events and introduce order into an individual lives, but this “self” has
no real existence.
Sigmund Freud
• A well-known Australian psychologist and considered
as the Father and Founder of Psychoanalysis. His
influence in Psychology and therapy is dominant and
popular in the 20th to 21st century.
• The dualistic view of self by Freud involves the
conscious self and unconscious self.
• The conscious self is governed by reality principle.
Here, the self is rational, practical, and appropriate to the
social environment. The conscious self has the task of
controlling the constant pressures of the unconscious
self, as its primitive impulses continually seek for
immediate discharge.
• The unconscious self is governed by pleasure principle.
It
Image Source: https://www.researchgate.net/
Gilbert Ryle
• A British analytical philosopher. He was an important
figure in the field of Linguistic Analysis which focused on the
solving of philosophical puzzles through an analysis of
language.
• According to Ryle, the self is best understood as a pattern
of behavior, the tendency or disposition for a person to behave
in a certain way in certain circumstances.
• He opposed the notable ideas of the previous philosophers
and even claimed that those were results of confused
conceptual thinking he termed, category mistake. The
category mistake happens when we speak about the self as
something independent of the physical body: a purely
Image Source: https://www.jstor.org/ mental entity existing in time but not space
Immanuel Kant
• A German Philosopher who made great contribution to the fields of
metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Kant is widely regarded as the greatest
philosopher of the modern period.
• Kant maintained that an individual self makes the experience of the world
comprehensible because it is responsible for synthesizing the discreet data of
sense experience into a meaningful whole.
• It is the self that makes consciousness for the person to make sense of
everything. It is the one that help every individual gain insight and knowledge.
If the self failed to do this synthesizing function, there would be a chaotic and
insignificant collection of sensations. Additionally, the self is the product of
reason, a regulative principle because the self regulates experience by making
unified experience possible and unlike Hume, Kant’s self is not the object of
consciousness, but it makes the consciousness understandable and unique.
• Transcendental apperception happens when people do not experience self directly,
instead as a unity of all impressions that are organized by the mind through
perceptions. Kant concluded that all objects of knowledge, which includes the self,
are phenomenal. That the true nature of things is altogether unknown and
unknowable (Price, 2000).
• For Kant, the kingdom of God is within man. God is manifested in people’s
lives therefore it is man’s duty to move towards perfection. Kant emphasized
that people should always see duty as a divine command (Price, 2000).
Maurice Merleau-Ponty
• A French philosopher and phenomenologist. He took a very different
approach to the self and the mind/body “problem.” According to him, the
division between the “mind” and the “body” is a product of confused
thinking. The self is experienced as a unity in which the mental and
physical are seamlessly woven together. This unity is the primary
experience of selves and begin to doubt it when an individual use their
minds to concoct abstract notions of a separate mind and body.
Developed the concept of self-subject and contended that perceptions
occur existentially. Thus, the consciousness, the world, and the human
body are all interconnected as they mutually perceive the world.
According to him, the world and the sense of self are emergent phenomena
in the ongoing process of man’s becoming. Phenomenology provides a
direct description of the human experience which serves to guide man’s
conscious actions. He further added that, the world is a field of perception,
and human consciousness assigns meaning to the world. Thus man cannot
separate himself from his perceptions of the world.
• Perception is not purely the result of sensations nor it is purely
interpretations. Rather consciousness is a process that includes sensing as
well as interpreting/reasoning.
LESSON 3: THE SELF ACCORDING TO SOCIOLOGY AND
ANTHROPOLOGY
Psychology
• The cognitive aspect of the self is known as self-concept. Self-concept is defined as self-
knowledge, a cognitive structure that includes beliefs about personality traits, physical
characteristics, abilities, values, goals, and roles, as well as the knowledge that an individual exist
as individuals. As humans grow and develop, self-concept becomes abstract and more complex.
• According to the psychologist Dr. Bruce A. Bracken in 1992, there are six specific domains that
are related to self-concept these are:
1) the social domain or the ability of the person to interact with others;
2) the competence domain or the ability to meet the basic needs;
3) the affect domain or the awareness of the emotional states;
4) the physical domain or the feelings about looks, health, physical condition, and overall
appearance;
5) academic domain or the success or failure in the school; and
6) family domain or how well one function within the family unit.
William James and the Me-Self and I-Self
William James is a well-known figure in Psychology
who is considered as the founder of functionalism. He
brought prominence to U.S. psychology through the
publication of The Principles of Psychology (1890) that
made him more influential than his contemporaries in the
field.
• James made a clear distinction between ways of
approaching the self – the knower (the pure or the I – Self)
and the known (the objective or the Me – Self). The function
of the knower (I-Self) according to James must be the agent
of experience. While the known (Me-Self) have three
different but interrelated aspects of empirical self (known
today as selfconcept): the Me viewed as material, the Me
viewed as social, and the Me viewed as spiritual in nature.
Imag e Source: https://the-mous e- trap.com/
• The material self is consists of everything an individual
call uniquely as their own, such as the body, family, home or
style of dress. On the other hand, social self refers to the
recognition an individual get from other people. Lastly,
spiritual self refers to the individual inner or subjective being.
• According to Multiple Selves Theory, there are different aspects of the self exist in an individual.
From here, we can say that self is a whole consist of parts, and these parts manifest themselves when
need arise.
• Gregg Henriques proposed the Tripartite Model of Human Consciousness, wherein he described that
self is consist of three related, but also separable domains these are the experimental self, private
self, and public self.
o The experiential self or the theater of consciousness is a domain of self that defined as felt
experience of being. This includes the felt consistency of being across periods of time. It is tightly
associated with the memory. This is a part of self that disappears the moment that an individual
enter deep sleep and comes back when they wake up.
o The private self consciousness system or the narrator/interpreter is a portion of self that verbally
narrates what is happening and tries to make sense of what is going on. The moment that you read
this part, there is somewhat like a “voice” speaking in your head trying to understand what this
concept is all about.
o Lastly, the public self or Persona, the domain of self that an individual shows to the public, and
this interacts on how others see an individual. Henriques’ Tripartite Model attempts to capture
the key domains of consciousness, both within the self and between others.
• Unified being is essentially connected to consciousness, awareness, and agency. A well-adjusted
person is able to accept and understood the success and failure that they experienced. They are those
kinds of person who continually adjust, adapt, evolve and survive as an individual with integrated,
unified, multiple selves.
Understanding individualism and collectivism could help in the understanding of the cross-
cultural values of a person. Not every culture is at one end or the other of the spectrum, but the majority
tend to favor one over the other in everyday life.
Individualistic Self
• Individualism is not the idea that individuals should live like isolated entity, nor the idea that they
should never get or give help from others, nor the idea that an individual never owes anything to other
people.
• Individualism is the idea that the fundamental unit of the human species that thinks, lives, and acts
toward goals is the individual. This means that we can form our own independent judgments, act on
our own thoughts, and disagree with others.
• Each adult individual can consider what is in his own best interests. Each can act on his own private
motivations and values and can judge other people as good people to form relationships with, or as
bad people to be avoided. Each can decide whether to cooperate with others to solve problems. Each
can choose to think for himself about the conclusions that the majority of others in a group come to,
accepting or rejecting their conclusions as indicated by his own thought.
• Example of the description would include an individual identifies primarily with self, with the needs
of the individual being satisfied before those of the group. Looking after and taking care of ourselves,
being self-sufficient, guarantees the well-being of the group. Independence and self-reliance are
greatly stressed and valued.
• In general, people tend to distance themselves psychologically and emotionally from each other. One
may choose to join groups, but group membership is not essential to one’s identity or success.
Individualist characteristics are often associated with men and people in urban settings. Western
cultures are known to be individualistic.
Collective Self
• Collectivism is the idea that the fundamental unit of the human species that thinks, lives, and acts
toward goals is not the individual, but some group. In different variants, this group may be the family,
the city, the economic class, the society, the nation, the race, or the whole human species. The group
exists as a super-organism separate from individuals: A group may make its own decisions, acts apart
from the actions of individuals, and has its own interests apart from those of the individuals that
compose it.
• Under collectivism, individuals are analogous to ants in the protection of their queen ant. The
individual ant doesn’t have minds of their own, and generally cannot disagree with the hive. Any ant
that acts in a way contrary to the interests of the group is a malfunctioning ant. If an ant does not
follow the certain pattern of how they protect their queen, it will be entirely unable to support itself,
find other ants that support other queen ant and will surely die in short order. If the malfunctioning
ant stays within the group, it will be a threat to the line appropriate to protecting the queen ant.
• Examples of the collectivist thinking is when our identity is in large part, a function of our membership
and role in a group, e.g., the family or work team. The survival and success of the group ensures the
well-being of the individual, so that by considering the needs and feelings of others, one protects
oneself. Harmony and the interdependence of group members are stressed and valued. Group
members are relatively close psychologically and emotionally, but distant toward non-group
members. Collectivist characteristics are often associated with women and people in rural settings.
• Asian countries are known to be collective in nature.
• Self has been an area of interest by French and English philosophers, and evident in the ideas of
Greek philosophers like Socrates and Plato.
• Descartes in 17th century emphasized the self in his dictum “I think therefore I am” which claims
that cognitive basis of the person’s thoughts is proof for the existence of the self.
• Kant believed that the self is capable of actions that entitles it to have rights as an autonomous
agent.
• Here are some qualities imparted to the Western subjective self. It sketches some features on
subjectivity and ways of thinking of western persons. This provides an impressionistic profile
through the use of a few strokes characterizing some ways of being and thinking of many western
persons.
o Western self as analytic. Since analytic and inductive modes of thinking were
prominent for person in western cultures, to see objects as divisible combinations of
yet smaller objects. Real things are not only visualized but immaterial things like
thoughts, ideas and memories would be given emphasis.
o Western self as monotheistic. Monotheism can be known as the rigid consequence of
the doctrine of normal human being. It is like forcing the concentration of
supernatural capabilities.
o Western self as individualistic. The emphasis on individualism has direct and indirect
effects on both the presentation of self (in public ways) and the experience of the self
(in private awareness).
o Western Self as materialistic and rationalistic. The western accentuation of rational,
scientific approach to reality has tended to define spiritual and immaterial phenomena
as potentially superstitious and dangerous. In any society, belief system is stratified
and composed of a hierarchy of interrelated, causal-explanatory models.
The Self as Embedded in Relationships and through Spiritual Development in Confucian Thought
• Confucius was born in the period of the Zhou Dynasty in
551 BCE in the state of Lu. He grew up poor although he was
descended from scholarly family.
• Confucius philosophy is known as humanistic social
philosophy which focusses on human beings and the society in
general.
• Confucianism is centered on ren which can be manifested
through the li (propriety), xiao (filiality), and yi (rightness). For
Confucius, ren reflects the person’s own understanding of
humanity. It is found within each person and can be realized in
one’s personal life and relationship. Ren guides human actions that
makes life worth living which can be realized through li, xiao, and
yi:
The understanding of the Physical self is shaped by biological and environmental factors.
The Biological blueprint involves Heredity and its important factors. Heredity is defined as the
transmission of traits from parents to offspring. The traits are made up of specific information embedded
within one’s gene. Genotype refers to the specific information embedded within one’s genes; not all
genotypes translate to an observed physical characteristic. Phenotype is the physical expression of a
particular trait. Each individual carries 23 pairs of chromosomes, which are threadlike bodies in the
nucleus of the cell and the storage unit of genes. The 23rd pair, also known as sex
chromosomes, determines the sex of an individual. Within each chromosome is the deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA), which is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions specifying the biological
development of every individual.
Maturation is known as the completion of growth of a genetic character within an organism or the
unfolding of an individual’s inherent traits or potential.
As you grow up, you are exposed to environmental influences that shape your physical self, including
those from your social networks, societal expectations, and cultural practices that will lead a person to
understand themselves.
As children advance in age, their interests change and with these come changes in their bodies. The
changes are rapid and before parents notice it, they are no longer babies but teenagers. An obvious change
in teenagers are the changes in Physical Self. The Physical Self refers to the concrete dimensions of the
body, it is the tangible aspect of the person which can be directly observed and examined.
Physical Characteristics are the defining traits or features of a person’s body. This is also the first thing
people see when they look at another person that could include facial features, hairstyle, clothes, or
figure. They encompass everything that one can describe about a person or group of people, by just
looking.
Erik Erikson believed in the importance of the body from early development because the physical as
well as intellectual skills will somehow serve as a basis to whether a person has achieved a sense of
competence and be able to manage and face the demands of life complexities. William James, on the
other hand, considered the body as the initial source of sensation and necessary for origin and
maintenance of personality.
A period of rapid physical changes is in Puberty. According to Santrock (2016), puberty is not the same
as adolescence because puberty ends prior to the end of the adolescent period. But the recognized puberty
as the most essential marker of the beginning of adolescence. The changes are experiences during puberty
are different from girls and boys. Girls reached puberty earlier than boys and experience menarche which
is her first menstrual flow. Boys, two or three years later, experience spermarche or semenarche which
is his first ejaculation or nocturnal emission (wet dreams).
Puberty is a brain neuroendocrine process occurring primarily in early adolescence that triggers the rapid
physical changes. The Pituitary gland is the master endocrine gland that controls growth and regulates
functions of all the other endocrine glands including gonads. The chemical substances secreted by the
gonads promotes physical changes such as height, widening of the hips and increase in fatty tissues in
the breast of girls and responsible for boy’s growth of facial and body hair, muscles, and changes in
voice.
Different levels of connectedness characterize the relationship between self and body. These
connectedness maybe in a positive or negative way, or in a helpful or destructive ways.
Nevertheless, it is between individuals as well as across situations. The potential of the physical
body to be regarded as an object introduces the possibility of trait and state body as well as the state
of the self.
Theory suggest that Physical body is both have objective and subjective components.
Individual’s conception and acknowledgment of their physical bodies substantiate their
assessment of the sense of totality which is an integral to his/her experience of the physical
world. Moreover, one’s experience of one’s physical body may be a key predictor of a variety
of behaviors.
2. Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective
Focuses on perceptual, cognitive, and affective aspect which is a multidimensional
experience that can aid to a more precise understanding of body. The cognitive-behavioral
perspective makes multiple distinctions to facilitate precise conceptual and operational
definitions of body-image related variables.
3. Feminist Perspective
Relies on the social construction in which there is a possibility of individuals to
experience their bodies in distorted way (especially, women). women’s dissatisfaction with
their bodies as a systematic social phenomenon rather than a result of individual pathology
(McKinley, 2002).
Specifically, the duality established between the mind and body in Western societies
and the pairing of men with the “mind” and women with the “body” contribute to women
experiencing their bodies differently than men.
1. Personal Factors
a. Introspection and Self-reflection. Looking inward is one of the simplest
way to achieve self-knowledge. According to Hewstone, et al., (2015)
Introspection is the process is the process by which one observes and
examines one’s internal state (mental and emotional) after behaving in a
certain way.
d. Personal Identity. This is the concept a person has about himself that
develops over the years. This includes aspects of his life that he was born
into like family, nationality, gender, physical traits as well as the choices
he makes, such as what he does for living, who his friends are and what he
believes in.
2. Social Factors
a. Attachment Process and Social Appraisal. According to Bowlby (1969),
people learn about their value and lovability when they experience how
their mothers or caregivers care for them and respond to their needs.
References:
Arcega, A M., Cullar, D. S., Evangelista, L. D. & Falculan, L. M. (2018). Understanding the Self. Malabon
City: Mutya Publishing House Inc.
Gazzingan, L. B. et al. (2019). Understanding the Self. Muntinlupa City: Panday-Lahi Publishing House,
Inc.
Hewstone, et.al. (2015). An Introduction to Social Psychology. UK: British Psychological Society and John
Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Krueger, D.W. 2002 Integrating body self and psychological self: Creating a new story in psychoanalysis
and psychotherapy. Accessed date: July 24, 2020. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-06051-000
Santrock, J (2014) Adolescence. New York, USA: McGraw Hill International edition
Santrock, M (2016) Essentials of Life Span Development 4th ed. New York, USA: McGraw Hill
International Ediction