Module 3
Module 3
Coverage:
a. Crime Concepts
b. Introduction to Criminal law
CLASSIFICATIONS OF CRIMES
LEGAL CLASSIFICATIONS:
• Freedom or voluntariness
• Intelligence
• Intent
- The act or omission of the offender is not malicious and the injury caused by
the offender is unintentional, it being the simply the incident of another act performed
without malice
• Lack of foresight
• Lack of skill
• Negligence
• Imprudence
4. According to plurality:
5. According to gravity:
a. Grave felonies - are those to which the law attaches the capital
punishment or penalties which in any of their period are afflictive.
b. Less grave felonies - are those which the law punishes with penalties
which in their maximum period are correctional.
c. Light felonies - are infraction of laws for the commission of which the
penalty of arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos or both is provided.
a. Crimes mala in se – are acts that are inherently evil. Examples are
murder, robbery, etc.
b. Crimes mala prohibita – are acts which are prohibited only because there
are laws forbidding such acts. Examples are Illegal Possession of firearms, Traffic
Violations, etc.
a. Seasonal crimes – are crimes that happen only during a particular season
or period of the year. Examples are violation of election law, tax law violations, etc.
b. Situational crimes – are crimes committed when the situation is conducive
to the commission of the crime and there is an opportunity to commit it. Examples are
pickpocketing, theft, etc.
a. Instant crimes – are those crimes that can be committed in a very short
time. Example: theft
a. Static crimes – are committed only in one place. Examples are theft and
robbery
b. Continuing crimes – are crimes that take place in more than one place or
several places. Examples: abduction, kidnapping, etc.
b. Irrational Crimes – when the offender suffers from any form of mental
disorders, insanity or abnormality. Thus, the offender doesn’t know what he is doing.
Why members of the society must be concerned with the study of crime
STUDY OF CRIMINALS
Who is a CRIMINAL?
- In the legal sense, a criminal is any person who has been found to have
committed a wrongful act in the course of the standard judicial process; there must be
a final verdict of his guilt
1. According to etiology
a. Acute criminal
- Person who violate criminal law because of the impulse of the moment,
fit of passion or anger or spell of extreme jealousy
b. Chronic criminal
c. Neurotic criminal
- Person whose actions arise from intra- psychic conflict between the
social and anti- social components of his personality
d. Normal criminal
– A person, who commits crimes because he looks up to, idolizes people who are
criminals.
2. According to the type of offender:
c. Habitual criminal – one who repeatedly commits criminal act for different
reasons.
EXPLANATION TO CRIMINALITY
3. The explanation that crime is the result of the free will of men
- According to Becarria, men are fundamentally a biological organism with
intelligence and rationality which control their behavior. Before men do
something, they try to determine the amount of pain they will suffer and the
amount of pleasure they will receive. They future actions will depend on the
algebraic sum of two considerations if there will be more pain than pleasure,
they will desist from doing the act. Finally, crime is caused by the rational
effort to minimize men to augment their pleasure and to minimize their pains.
4. The explanation that crime is the result of the free will of men but were
committed due to some compelling reasons prevailed
- This explanation accept the fact that crimes are committed in accordance
with the free will of men but the act of committing a crime is modified by
some causes that finally prevail upon the person to commit crime. These
causes are pathology, incompetence, insanity or any condition that will make
it possible for the individual to exercise free will entirely. In the study of legal
provisions this is termed as either mitigating or exempting circumstances.
1. Geographical factors
2. Biological factors
3. Psychoanalytic and Psychiatric factors
4. Sociological factors
5. Other criminogenic factors
Biological Factors
A man as a living organism has been the object of several studies which has the
purpose of determining the causes of his crimes. Among the studies are the following;
1. Physiognomy- this is the study of the relationship between the facial features
and human conduct of a person in relation to his crimes. This study was used
by Becarria in 1764 and Lavater in 17775 wherin they both stated that the
way to disco ver the character of a person is by the observation of his
physical appearance, measurement of the outward appearance. Both claimed
that bald men, bearded women, shifty eyes, weak chin and arrogant nose are
inclinations.
2. Phrenology or Craniology
This is the study of external formation of the skull that indicates the
conformation of the brain and the development of its various parts in
relation to the behavior of the criminal Franz Joseph Christaph Spursheim
claimed in his study that the shape of the head of the criminals differs
from that of the non- criminals. The theory however was found without
scientific basis.
3. Study of the Physical Defects and Handicapped in relation to crimes
a. persons suffering from physical defects have poor social relationship and
serious emotional disturbance
b. it reduces his capacity to complete occupationally and socially
c. persons suffering from defects are frequently irritated by friends and resort to
violent criminal behavior
Types of Physique
a. Endomorphic
- Relatively great development of digestive viscera, tendency to put on fat, soft
roundness through various regions of the body, short tapering limbs, small
bones and smooth velvety skin
b. Mesomorphic
- Relatively predominance of muscles, bone and the motor organs of the body,
large wrist and hands, if lean, a hard rectangular outline.
c. Ectomorphic
- relative predominance of skin and its appendages which includes the
nervous system, lean, fragile, delicate bones, droopy shoulders, small face,
sharp nose, fine hair, relatively small body and with great surface area.
Temperament
a. Endomorphic- Viscerotonic
- general relaxation of body; a comfortable person, loves luxury, an essentially
EXTROVERT person
b. Mesomorphic- Romotonic
- active, dynamic, walks, talks, gestures assertively and behaves aggressively
c. Ectomorphic- Cerebrotonic
- INTROVERT, full of functional complaints, allergies, skin troubles, chronic
fatigue, insomnia, sensitive skin, shrinks from the crowd
The common household expressions like “it is in the blood” and “like father like
son” are usually heard whenever there are several members in the family are
criminals. Accordingly, heredity transmits single traits and characteristics from
parents to offspring’s. Criminality of the offspring is used to determine the nature of
the parent and nature of their crimes. Although modern criminologists seem not to
accept the role of heredity in the formation of criminal behavior of men, it cannot be
denied that it plays an important role and is contributory in the genesis of criminal
behavior.
The following are some proofs to show the role of heredity in the
development of criminality.
A. Study of Kallikak Family Tree (Goddard)
Martin Kallikak was a soldier of the American revolutionary war, and while
stationed in a small village, he met and had an illicit relation with a feeble minded girl.
About 489 descendants from this lineage where traced which included 143
feebleminded and only 46 were normal. Thirty six (36) were epileptics, 3 were
criminals, and 8 were kept in brothels and 82 died in infancy.
At the close of the war, Martin Kallikak Sr. returned to his home and marry a
Quaker of good family. Out of this marriage, 4 967 of the descendants has been traced,
and all, but one were not normal mentally. Only two were known to be alcoholic, one
was convicted of religious offense, 15 died in infancy and no one became criminal or
epileptic.
The Juke Family Tree was consisted of six girls of who were illegitimate. One of
the six girls was known as “Margaret”- the ‘Mother of Criminals.” Dugdale traced the
1200 descendants for 75 years from its origin and found 280 as paupers, 140 criminals,
60 habitual thieves, 300 infants prematurely born, 7 murderers, 50 prostitutes, 440
contaminated with sexual diseases, and 30 were prosecuted for bastardy.
Sir Jonathan Edwards was a famous preacher during the Colonial Period. When
his family tree was traced, none of the descendants was found to be criminal. On the
other hand, many became Presidents of the United States, Governors, and members of
the Supreme Court, famous writers, preachers, and teachers.
Psychoanalytic Factors
1. AICHORN- in his book “Wayward Youth”, 1925 said that the cause of crime
and delinquency is the faulty development of the child during the first few
years of his life. As a child, the human being normally follows his pleasure
impulses instinctively. Soon he grew up and finds some restrictions to these
pleasure impulses which he must control. Otherwise, he suffers from faulty
ego development and become delinquent.
2. ABRAHAMSEN in his book “ Crime and the Human Mind,” 1945 explained the
cause of crime by this formula;
a. ID- the part that contains powerful urges and drive for gratification and
satisfaction. At this point, the human being is prepared to behave only in
terms of pleasure principle towards the discharge of his instinctual energies.
Selfishness, violence and anti social wishes are part of the original instinct of
man.
b. Ego- acts as a moderator or between super ego and Id. Follow the reality
principle.
c. Super Ego- the “conscience of man.” It is the role of the agencies outside of
the home which tries to control the ego. The super ego tries to correct or
control the ego and may be represented by the voice of God, moral truth,
commandments of society, and good of the majority, cultural interventions
and other rules.
This criminosynthesis explain the reasons why a person commit or inhibit himself
from doing so under the following conditions;
a. Need Frustration- the person before committing the crime is likely to feel
unhappy, unsatisfied, resentful or angry about something in particular or
about life in general.
b. Internal Inhibition- it refers to all types of internal forces which may
prevent a person from committing a crime. These forces may be person’s
conscience, or his principles, or his sense of self- respect or the particular
conception he has, sense of guilt or remorse that he may experience.
These forces operate from within the person without any need for restrain
from the outside.
c. External Inhibition- this forces may be produced by the thought that the
person may get caught if he commits the crime, or sentenced to a prison
for a given number of years, or disgraced in the community or punished in
some other way.
d. Contact with reality- refers to the extent to which a person learn from his
past experiences especially his past mistakes as well as to the extent to
which he can evaluate the consequences of his present action in relation
to his future.
e. Situational crime potential- refers to the cultural opportunity to commit
crime. That is to the easiness or possibilities to commit crime offered by a
given place, situation, person or environment.
f. Potential Satisfaction- refers to the balance of gain and loss that a person
may experience if he commits a crime. If a person has nothing to lose, he
is more likely to commit the crime. Instead, he has a great deal of assets
in life and cares about them such as love in relation to his parents, his
family, children, job, money in the bank, property, good reputation etc.
Sociological Causes of Crime
It refers to things, places and people with whom in contact and plays an important
part in determining our action and conduct. These causes may bring about the
development of criminal behavior. Edwin H. Sutherland briefly explained the process by
which a particular person comes to engage in criminal behavior.
Primitive Tribes
CODE OF HAMMURABI
b. It provides the first comprehensive view of the laws in the early days
c. The Code was carved in stone
d. The “law of talion”, or the principle of “tit for tat”,(an eye for an eye,
tooth for a tooth) appears throughout the Code
e. Under the principle of the law of talion, the punishment should be the
same as the harm inflicted on the victim
b) The killer is answerable not to the family of the victim but to the king
c) Death was the penalty for robbery, theft, false witness, building a house
that falls on its owner (if the house should collapse and kill the owner’s son, the son of
the builder would be the one executed)
d) A son who struck his father would suffer the amputation of a hand
e) If in an assault a victim m’s bone was broken, the same bone of the
assailant would be broken
THE HITTITES
the Hittites existed about two centuries after Hammurabi and eventually
conquered Babylon
Highlights of the laws of the Hittites:
capital punishment was used for many offenses, except for homicide or robbery
rape, sexual intercourse with animals, defiance of the authority and sorcery were
all punishable by death
the law of homicide provided for the restitution to the victim’s heirs
law enforcement and judicial functions were placed in the hands of commanders
of military garrisons
CODE OF DRAKON
LAWS OF SOLON
the thief was required to return stolen property and pay the victim a sum equal
to twice its value
for the crime of temple robbery, the penalty was death
for rape of a woman, the penalty was a fine of certain amount
Roman law began with the Twelve Tables which were written in the middle of
the sixth century BC
the Twelve Tables were the foundation of all laws in Rome and written in tablets
of bronze
the Twelve Tables were drafted by the Decemvirs, a body of men composed of
patricians
if a man break another’s limb and does not compensate the injury, he shall be
liable to retaliation
a person who committed arson of a house or a stack of corn shall be burned
alive
judges who accepted bribes as well as those who bribed them were subject to
execution
any act of treason was punishable by crucifixion
Origins of Law
Order is essential for society, and law can be conceived as simply a body of rules
governing a social order. This section provides a brief discussion on how laws came to
be.
– is that branch of public law which defines crimes treats of their nature and
provides for their punishment.
– Book that contains the Philippine Criminal Law and different special laws and
decrees which are penal in nature. It is called as RPC because the old penal code which
took effect in the country on July 14, 1887 and was in force until Dec. 31, 1931 was
revised by the Committee created by Administrative Order No. 94 of the Department of
Justice, dated Oct. 18, 1927, composed of Anacleto Diaz as Chairman, Alex Reyes and
Mariano de Joya as members.The RPC was approved on Dec. 8, 1930 and took effect
on January 1, 1932.
a. Head of state
b. Atmosphere water – all bodies of water that connect all the islands such
as bays, rivers and streams
c. Maritime zone – the twelve (12) Nautical Mile limit beyond our shore
measured at low tide
The Revised Penal Code shall be applicable to all cases committed outside the
Philippine territorial jurisdiction under the following circumstances:
d) Should commit any of the crimes against national security and law of
nations
3. Prospectively
- The provisions of the RPC cannot be applied if the act is not yet punishable on
the time the felony was committed. However, it may have a retroactive effect if it is
favorable to the accused who is not a habitual delinquent.
5. It is uniform in application.
Penal sanction is the most essential part of the definition of the crime. If there is
no penalty to a prohibited act, its enforcement will almost be impossible. The penalty is
acting as deterrence and as a measure of self-defense of the state to protect society
from the threat and wrong inflicted by the criminal.