Scribd
Upload
118 views

Chapter-Ii-Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil

The document discusses bearing capacity of soils and foundations. It defines key terms like ultimate, gross, net, safe bearing capacities. It describes factors affecting bearing capacity like soil properties, foundation size/shape, groundwater level. It then summarizes four common methods - Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Skempton, Brinch Hansen - to calculate ultimate bearing capacity based on soil friction angle and cohesion, incorporating depth factors. It provides examples of calculating bearing capacity of strip, square, and rectangular footings in clay using these methods.

Uploaded by

abyalew b.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
118 views

Chapter-Ii-Bearing Capacity of Foundation Soil

The document discusses bearing capacity of soils and foundations. It defines key terms like ultimate, gross, net, safe bearing capacities. It describes factors affecting bearing capacity like soil properties, foundation size/shape, groundwater level. It then summarizes four common methods - Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Skempton, Brinch Hansen - to calculate ultimate bearing capacity based on soil friction angle and cohesion, incorporating depth factors. It provides examples of calculating bearing capacity of strip, square, and rectangular footings in clay using these methods.

Uploaded by

abyalew b.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

CHAPTER-II-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS

INTRODUCTION
The subject of bearing capacity is perhaps the most
important of all the aspects of geotechnical engineering.
Loads from buildings are transmitted to the foundation by
columns, by load bearing walls or by such other load-
bearing components of the structures.
Sometimes the material on which the foundation rests is
ledge, very hard soil or bed-rock, which is known to be
much stronger than is necessary to transmit the loads from
the structure.
Such a ledge, or rock, or other stiff material may not be
available at reasonable depth and it becomes invariably
necessary to allow the structure to bear directly on soil,
which will furnish a satisfactory foundation, if the bearing
members are properly designed.
Definitions of bearing capacity
Bearing capacity: The load-carrying capacity of foundation
soil or rock which enables it to bear and transmit loads from
a structure.
Ultimate bearing capacity: Maximum pressure which a
foundation can withstand without the occurrence of shear
failure of the foundation.
Gross bearing capacity: The bearing capacity inclusive of the
pressure exerted by the weight of the soil standing on the
foundation, or the ‘surcharge’ pressure, as it is sometimes
called.
Net bearing capacity: Gross bearing capacity minus the
original overburden pressure or surcharge pressure at the
foundation level; obviously, this will be the same as the
gross capacity when the depth of foundation is zero, i.e., the
structure is founded at ground level.
Safe bearing capacity: Ultimate bearing capacity divided by
the factor of safety. The factor of safety in foundation may
range from 2 to 5, depending upon the importance of the
structure, and the soil profile at the site.
It is defined as the maximum intensity of loading which can be
transmitted to the soil without the risk of shear failure,
irrespective of the settlement that may occur.
Allowable bearing pressure: The maximum allowable net
loading intensity on the soil at which the soil neither fails in
shear nor undergoes excessive or intolerable settlement,
detrimental to the structure.
Factors Affecting Bearing Capacity
The following are some of the factors which affect bearing
capacity are,
(i) Nature of soil and its physical and engineering properties;
(ii) Nature of the foundation and other details such as the size,
shape, depth below the ground surface and rigidity of the
structure;
(iii) Total and differential settlements that the structure can
withstand without functional failure;
(iv) Location of the ground water table relative to the level of
the foundation; and
(v) Initial stresses, if any.
General determination of bearing capacity of soils using
different methods.
1)Terzaghi’s Method
Terzaghi considered the base of the footing to be rough, which
is nearer facts, and that it is located at a depth Df below the
ground surface (Df ≤ b, where b is the width of the footing).
The soil above the base of the footing is replaced by an
equilvalent surcharge, q(= γDf).This substitution simplifies
the computations very considerably, the error being
unimportant and on the safe side. This, in effect, means that
the shearing resistance of the soil located above the base is
neglected. (For deep foundations, where Df > b, this aspect
becomes important and cannot be ignored).
The zone of plastic equilibrium, CDEFG, can be
subdivided into I a wedge-shaped zone located beneath the
loaded strip, in which the major principal stresses are
vertical, II two zones of radial shear, BCD and ACG,
emanating from the outer edges of the loaded strip, with
their boundaries making angles (45° – φ/2) and φ with the
horizontal, and III two passive Rankine zones, AGF and
BDE, with their boundaries making angles (45° – φ/2) with
the horizontal.
Bearing capacity of shallow circular and square footings
The bearing capacity of circular footings has been proposed
by Terzaghi as follows,
The bearing capacity factors of Terzaghi are tabulated in Table
for certain values of φ:
2)Meyerhof’s Method
The important difference between Terzaghi’s and
Meyerhof’s approaches is that the latter considers the
shearing resistance of the soil above the base of the
foundation, while the former ignores it. Thus, Meyerhof
allows the failure zones to extend up to the ground surface
(Meyerhof, 1951). Meyerhof ’s equation for the bearing
capacity of a strip footing is of the same general form as
that of Terzaghi:

wherein Nc, Nq and Nγ are ‘‘Meyerhof’s bearing capacity


factors’’, which depend not only on φ, but also on the depth
and shape of the foundation and roughness of the base.
The typical failure surface assumed by Meyerhof is
shown in Fig.
The nature of the failure surface assumed by Meyerhof
implies the occurrence of a substantial downward
movement of the footing before the full value of the
shearing resistance is mobilised.
This may be more probable in the case of purely cohesive
soils as indicated by the available experimental evidence.
Hence, the values of Nc from Meyerhof’s theory for
cohesive soils are given as follows:
For strip footings: Nc = 5.5(1 + 0.25 Df/b)
with a limiting value of 8.25 for Nc for Df /b > 2.5.
For square or circular footings: Nc = 6.2 (1 + 0.32 Df /b)
with a limiting value of 9.0 for Nc for Df /b > 2.5.
(b is the side of a square or diameter of circular footing).
3) Skempton’s Method
Skempton proposed equations for bearing capacity of
footings founded in purely cohesive soils based on
extensive investigations (Skempton, 1951). He found that
the factor Nc is a function of the depth of foundation and
also of its shape. His equations may be summarised as
follows:
The net ultimate bearing capacity is given by:
qnet ult = c . Nc
wherein Nc is given as follows:
Strip footings: Nc = 5 (1 + 0.2 Df /b)
with a limiting value of Nc of 7.5 for Df /b > 2.5.
Square or circular footings:Nc = 6(1 + 0.2Df /b)
with a limiting value of Nc of 9.0 for Df /b >2.5.
(b is the side of square or diameter of circular footing).
Rectangular footings:
4) Brinch Hansen’s Method
Brinch Hansen (1961) has proposed the following semi-
empirical equation for the bearing capacity of a footing, as a
generalisation of the Terzaghi equation:

where Qult = vertical component of the total load (= V),


A = effective area of the footing (this will arise for inclined
and eccentric loads, when the area A is transformed to an
estimated equivalent rectangle with sides b and L, such that
the load is central to the area),
q = overburden pressure at the foundation level (= γ . Df),
Nc, Nq and Nγ = bearing capacity factors of Hansen, given as
follows:
Nq = Nφ . eπ tan φ
Nc = (Nq – 1) cot φ
Nγ = 1.8 (Nq – 1) tan φ
(Nφ = tan2 (45° + φ/2), with the usual notation.)
s′s = shape factors
d′s = depth factors, and
i′s = inclination factors.
The bearing capacity factors of Hansen, shape factors, depth
factors, and inclination factors are given in Table
Example-1: A continuous footing of width 2.5m rests 1.5m
below the ground surface in clay. The unconfined compressive
strength of the clay is 150kN/m2. Calculate the ultimate
bearing capacity of the footing. Assume unit weight of soil is
16 kN/m3.
Solution
Example-2 Compute the safe bearing capacity of a continuous
footing 1.8m wide, and located at a depth of 1.2m below
ground level in a soil with unit weight
γ=20kN/m3,c=20kN/m2, and φ = 20°. Assume a factor of
safety of 2.5. Terzaghi’s bearing capacity factors for φ = 20°
are Nc = 17.7, Nq = 7.4, and Nγ = 5.0, what is the permissible
load per metre run of the footing ?
Solution
Example-3: What is the ultimate bearing capacity of a square
footing resting on the surface of a saturated clay of unconfined
compressive strength of 100kN/m2.
Solution
Square footing. Saturated clay, φ = 0° Df = 0.
Example-4: A steam turbine with base 6m × 3.6m weighs
10,000kN. It is to be placed on a clay soil with C =135
kN/m2. Find the size of the foundation required if the factor
of safety is to be 3. The foundation is to be 60cm below
ground surface.
Solution
Example-5: What is the safe bearing capacity of a rectangular
footing, 1m × 2m, placed at a depth of 2m in a saturated clay
having unit weight of 20kN/m3 and unconfined compression
strength of 100kN/m2 ? Assume a factor of safety of 2.5.
Solution

You might also like