Scribd
Upload
49 views

Rubrics On Collaboration Group Presentation

Collaboration Group D's presentation is being rated using criteria in the areas of content, quality and creativity, and teamwork and technicality. The rater is Julianne Mari Du Wong and they rated the presentation on January 31, 2023. For each criteria there are standards of Exemplar, Competent, Approaching competence, Developing, and Not met. The rater then selects the appropriate standard for how Collaboration Group D met each individual criteria. This review will contribute to the group's overall grade.

Uploaded by

Julianne Mari Wong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views

Rubrics On Collaboration Group Presentation

Collaboration Group D's presentation is being rated using criteria in the areas of content, quality and creativity, and teamwork and technicality. The rater is Julianne Mari Du Wong and they rated the presentation on January 31, 2023. For each criteria there are standards of Exemplar, Competent, Approaching competence, Developing, and Not met. The rater then selects the appropriate standard for how Collaboration Group D met each individual criteria. This review will contribute to the group's overall grade.

Uploaded by

Julianne Mari Wong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Please rate the presentation of COLLABORATION GROUP D using the following rubrics.

Email
the accomplished form back to me. This will form part of the group’s grade for this
requirement. Thank you.

NAME OF RATER: Julianne Mari Du Wong. Date accomplished: 31 January 2023

Presentation on Perspectives of the Self

STANDARD
CRITERIA (E=Exemplar; C=Competent; A=Approaching competence; D=Developing;
N=Not met)
E - Information presented is very helpful and understandable; provided more
Content (40%) than enough information without exceeding time limit or resulting to
information overload.
C - Gave adequate and useful information regarding the assigned
perspective.
A - Provided useful information although may have missed some
important details.
D - Provided useful information although many important details are
missing.
N - Does not contain useful information regarding the assigned
perspective.
E - Has all of the following: Clear objectives, well-executed, innovative, use of
appropriate materials/props, over-all interesting
C - Has 4 of the following: Clear objectives, well-executed, innovative, use of
appropriate materials/props, over-all interesting
Quality and A - Has 3 of the following: Clear objectives, well-executed, innovative, use of
creativity (30%) appropriate materials/props, over-all interesting
D - Has 2 of the following: Clear objectives, well-executed, innovative, use of
appropriate materials/props, over-all interesting
N - Has 0-1 of the following: Clear objectives, well-executed, innovative, use
of appropriate materials/props, over-all interesting
Teamwork and E - All collaboration members participated, collaboration team relationship
technicality (30%) was harmonious, output did not exceed or was not relatively short compared
to given time limit
C - Majority of collaboration members participated, collaboration team
relationship was harmonious, output did not exceed or was not relatively
short compared to given time limit
A - Majority of collaboration members participated, collaboration team
relationship was harmonious, output exceeded or too short compared to
given time limit
D - Collaboration team evidently attempted to cooperate and achieve
harmony, output exceeded or too short compared to given time limit
N - Collaboration team failed to achieve harmony and cooperation, output
exceeded or too short compared to given time limit

You might also like