Colored Edited
Colored Edited
The RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAIN HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE IN A NURSING CORE SUBJECT AMONG NURSING STUDENTS
PONIO, KRISTIE ANNE FAITH L. PUEDAN, GINO CARLO D. RAFER, ALAIN BRIAN M. ROJAS, VICTOR IAN E. ROXAS, ANA MELIZA A. SABERON, MARIANNE IVES B. SALES, JOSE MARTIN K. SAN MIGUEL, MARIANELA E. UY, ROXANNE DIANE R. VERGARA, JOHANNA MAE A. VILLARAZA, DUSTIN KENT E. VILLARBA, LOVELLA ALMA J.
Henderson
Chapter 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND Introduction What is the brain doing when one thinks? says, but cant see or feel it working. One knows what it
regarding things that one sees, hears, smells, tastes, and think of are processed in different sections of the brain. Location of feelings like anger, love, hate, sympathy, and so forth are known but none of these are visible while its happening.
Hippocrates, who examined the brain during the autopsies he performed, concluded that the brain of man is double. He was
referring to what is known now as hemispheres. These hemispheres are the two halves of the brain-the left hemisphere and the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere commands the right side of the body, and the right hemisphere commands the left side of the body. Functions of these hemispheres are not shared equally; one side of the brain may be more dominant. The left and right hemispheres can both reason but in different ways. The left brain is considered to be the analytical hemisphere, meaning the left brained people are usually good in math and logic and prefer reading and a quiet environment. On
the other hand, the right hemisphere is described as holistic or global and is thought to be involved more in functions such as spatial perception and musical ability. Right brained people are good in creative writing, art and prefer daydreaming, philosophy and sports.
There have been many studies on how the brain functions. Because of the discoveries of the functions and parts of the brain, many scientists pioneered to work and focus on studies about the hemisphere dominance of individuals. One has been made by Roger Sperry which tells that each half of the brain has different
characteristics and abilities. Another scientist, Ned Herrmann, also known as the Father of Brain Dominance Technology, incorporated the research of Paul MacLean of the Triune Brain and Roger Sperrys Left Brain/Right Brain function, and built a Whole Brain Model of cognitive preferences. Appendix A shows the whole brain model and its physiological roots
Brain function can be applied with the nursing curriculum. It is utilized specifically in different aspects of the curriculum since the subjects can both enhance the right and left brain hemispheres. Level I has subjects like man is society, general education and associated in health and science education which entails the use of the left
hemisphere. In level II, concepts of health promotion and prevention of disease are the main focus. In this level, the right hemisphere is gradually being introduced while the left hemisphere is being more developed. Level III focus more on concepts of illness (curative, rehabilitative). In this level there is a balance between the right and left hemisphere since the students are exposed in hospital setting. Level IV comprises preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative nursing management. In this level, right and left hemisphere are used. The brain hemisphere dominance is a helpful tool in developing a good quality nursing curriculum. Appendix B shows the conceptual
framework of the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) curriculum. The researchers became interested in the study because they want to know the connection of the Brain Hemisphere Dominance (BHD) with performance of nursing students as guided by the nursing curriculum. By conducting the study, the researchers want to
determine if there really is a relationship between nursing students BHD and their performance in a nursing core subject which is a combination of didactic classroom/ lecture learning and skills/ hands-on learning or known to nursing field as Related Learning Experience (RLE). In doing so, the researchers will gain knowledge on how the
brain works and will be able to understand some factors affecting students performance in their subject. More specifically the study will
try to determine a connection between brain function with nursing students performance. The researchers also noted that there are no other particular studies regarding the relationship of BHD and nursing students performance. Therefore, if proven to have a relationship, this study will be the first to establish significance of BHD use in the nursing field.
Theoretical Framework This study is based on the Whole Brain Model of Ned Herrmann or also known as the Four Quadrant Model. William E. Ned Herrmann (1922 December 24, 1999) who is known to be the Father of Brain Dominance Technology was famous for his research in creative thinking and whole-brain methods. For 20 years, he dedicated his life in applying brain dominance theory to teaching, learning, increasing self-understanding and enhancing
creative thinking capabilities on both an individual and corporate level. Herrmanns involvement to the application of brain dominance brought him worldwide recognition. In 1978, Ned Herrmann formulated the Herrmann Participant Survey Form to profile workshop participants thinking styles and learning preferences in accordance with the brain dominance theory. He developed and validated the Herrmann Brain Dominance
Instrument (HBDI), the scored and analyzed Participant Survey, and designed the Applied Creative Thinking Workshop (ACT), which has been recognized as a leading workshop on creative thinking.
The Whole Brain Model of Ned Herrmann was produced through the incorporated research of Paul Mclean of the Triune Brain Theory and Roger Sperry Lateralization. He was able to build a model of the human brain with two paired structures; these structures are the two halves of the cerebral system and the two halves of the limbic system. Due to these divisions, he differentiated the distinctive functions of the left and right brain and also distinguished specific functions of the limbic preference. Ned Herrmanns theory emphasized the concept of dominance. He believes that two of anything in the body, one side has a natural dominance over the other. The Herman Brain Dominance Model focuses on the Limbic and Cerebral layers of the brain because dominance can only take place between paired structures. It is a metaphorical interpretation on the way one thinks and his preferred ways of learning. Four distinct styles are shown in the Whole Brain Model. A continuity of progression was seen in the Whole Brain Model of cognitive preferences and a questionnaire called the HBDI. Herrmann then divided the brain into four different systems along with its different preferred styles, which became his inspiration to develop the Whole Brain Model. A: Left cerebral hemisphere - analytical
B: Left limbic system - sequential C: Right limbic system - interpersonal D: Right cerebral hemisphere - imaginative
As for the critiques, with the development of the model and questionnaires it seems to show little proof for differences in the left and right hand limbic systems. On the other hand, Herrmanns system does not try to be an accurate model on how the brain functions rather it should be considered of as a model of different styles partly inspired by the brain and result of extensive questionnaires. Four separate clusters seemed to emerge, as he developed his questionnaires. Substantial work has been tested to ensure the validity of this system with overall positive results. Similar works were done by Jacquelyn Wonder, Priscilla Donovan, Beverly Moore, and others. A more extensive International research was done by Kobus Neethling, under the research guidance of Prof. Paul Torrance of the University of Georgia, who developed the Neethling Brain Instrument (NBI).
10
basis of the
researchers study because the Whole Brain Model can show the thinking process of nursing students particular BHD, which can explain the kind of performance nursing students manifest in their subject. Appendix C shows the whole brain model.
Conceptual Paradigm
The independent variable of the study is the nursing students BHD profile. BHD results from the test that will be given by the researchers. The dependent variable of the study will be the performance ratings acquired by the nursing students in a level nursing core subject. Ratings will rely on the input of the respondents toward the subject, which will be graded by lecturers and clinical instructors.
11
Statement of the Problem The researchers aim to determine the relationship between BHD of nursing students and their performance in the nursing core subject. More specifically, this research aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the profile of nursing students in terms of the following: 1.1. Gender 1.2 BHD 1.3 Grade 1.3.1. Lecture 1.3.2. RLE 1.4 Gender and BHD 1.5 BHD and Grade 1.5.1. Lecture
12
1.5.2. RLE
2. Is there a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance rating in a nursing core subject? 3. Is there a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance rating in a nursing core subject?
Hypothesis Ho1: There is no significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance rating in a nursing core subject Ho2: There is no significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance rating in a nursing core subject
13
Basic Assumptions 1. The researchers assumed that respondents will take the test seriously 2. The researchers assumed that the students are graded
individually
14
Significance of the Study The results of this study will benefit the following: Nursing Students. If the researchers are able to conduct the study properly, the nursing students will able to identify their type of brain hemisphere dominance and apply their learned knowledge from the study to facilitate in the improvement of their performance.
Specifically, if the nursing student is found to have a left brain dominance they will be able to improve skills of the right hemisphere and vice versa. Improving skills of the non-dominant hemisphere will then make the nursing students more balance. The study will also
15
Nursing Faculty. Results of the study will aid clinical instructors and lecturers in the formulation of their teaching strategies to maximize the students learning capabilities to better understand the variations in the learning abilities of the students. Despite the nursing students from having different brain hemisphere dominance, meaning different skills capability, the clinical instructors and lecturers can still able to deliver optimal knowledge.
Institution.
performance of nursing students, it can be applied to other courses and even to the lower school, thus maximizing both students and educators capabilities. With this, schools can provide appropriate learning environment that molds globally competitive students.
16
Scope and Delimitation The conduct of this study included graduating nursing students, batch 2009.
17
The respondents gender are gathered. Their brain hemisphere dominance was tested. The researcher included their final ratings in both academic and clinical performance in a nursing core subject.
On the day of implementation, absent respondents were not included in the study.
18
It is the tendency of a students brain to be prevalent on either left or right, or both by using the Brain Dominance Questionnaire. It is also known as brain hemisphericity, or brain lateralization or brain dominance.
Nursing Core Subject A BSN program which is a combination of didactic classroom and clinical experience. It is specifically known as Nursing Care
Management. This course provides the students the developmental theories and concepts to critically analyze the health needs and concerns of the individual, family, and community. Classroom and RLE will develop the knowledge, attitude, skills, values on health promotion and the identification and management of risk factors. Nursing Students This refers to students taking up BSN in Southville International School and Colleges (SISC) who have fulfilled all academic and clinical requirements, make-up duties for all year levels qualified for the pinning and clinical graduation. They will be identified in this study as: 1. Left-brained student/people/person or Left brainers (those who will have a left BHD)
19
2. Right-brained student/people/person or Right brainers (those who will have a right BHD) 3. Mid-brained student/people/person or Left brainers (those who will have a bilateral BHD)
Performance Refers to ability to do, carry out, accomplish school (Academic Performance) and medical (Clinical Performance) related tasks. School tasks will be measured using ratings given by lecturers while medical related tasks will be measured using ratings given by clinical instructors.
Chapter 2
20
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Conceptual Literature OVERVIEW This part of the thesis talks about the previous observations and studies made regarding the concepts in this study. It focuses on the interrelatedness as well as the different arguments made by the people who postulated on the important topics. It also contains two parts which are performance and brain hemisphere dominance. The part of performance comprises the academic and the skills or the clinical performance. The BHD is composed of the background of having a right, left, or bilateral BHD and its impact on learning and its effect on school performance.
I. Performance In 1975 Tuckman posited that performance is applied to label the observable and manifestation and of knowledge, It is skills, the
concepts,
understanding
ideas.
accomplishment of set tasks in a course objective in order to meet the requirement of examination syllabus. It is also the
application of a learning product that at the end of the process provides mastery. Likewise Wiseman in 1961 mentioned that
21
the acquisition of particular grades on examinations indicate candidates ability, mastery of the content, skills in applying learned knowledge to particular situations. A students
achievement is generally judged on examination performance. Success on examinations is a crucial indicator that a student has benefited from a course of study. However in 1974 Harrison posited that although an examination is not a perfect gauge of educational success of pupils, it is a vital indicator in ones countrys educational systems which cannot be ignored.
A. Academic Performance Many studies have been available about the prediction of academic achievement and diverse variables have been
suggested for this reason. In 1971 Hoyt said that, in general, one can distinguish between studies oriented towards intellectual traits and studies concerning non-intellectual characteristics of the student population. Nonintellectual traits such as socio-
economic status, sex, motivation, academic interests, personal adjustment to the university subculture, social maturity and emotional stability, personality style, extracurricular activities and choice of study field, yield a weaker correlation with
22
academic results. Also his one regular finding has been that the two sexes differ notably in their academic success. As wellknown, no fully satisfactory details for these findings was at hand.
In relation to intellectual traits, Jex in 1966 stated that there seems to be an apparent relationship between academic results and high school record and the results of some specific standardized achievement tests according to Fredericksen and Melville (1954). In a Miles study (1979), a major correlation is established between academic record and the mental ability at age 11.
B. Skills/Clinical Performance According to Lindgren in 1976 it is through skills that an individual acquires information. The necessity for information about the world is a challenge that one can only meet by acquiring and utilizing appropriate skills, and it is impossible to gain knowledge about skills without using information.
In 1993 Joan Freeman states that, Good intellectual skills have to be learnt, although basic sensory awareness naturally is
23
a normal condition. Meaning, ones intellectual capacity to manage incoming information, store it in flexible group in the memory, recover it for application to different situations, and accept new information, all have to be polished to reach levels of competency. This process requires directive teaching. All the senses are teachable to develop them into intellectual skills. She postulated that, the processes of intellectual growth are not restricted to the simple attainment of skills; each new skill adds to and changes what has already been tried out. Perception is learnt from familiarity and it affects reasoning: good reasoning based on mistaken perceptions will generate faulty conclusions. Good quality education is largely concerned with correcting misconception and by broadening a childs outlook, in such a way that the individual can reach personal conclusions from what Freeman has observed. She also argued that analytical skills are sometimes called successive progressing which uses information in a time sequence. Meaning that one thought must logically follow another. In that, each process is connected in the chain of reasoning being dependent on the last.
Accuracy is necessary in any field of work. It therefore means that, workers have to make the most of skills as possible
24
in ones area. By reading and listening, then the skill of comprehension will be improved. It can be noted that at the point where the students recognize what is anticipated, then they will be ale to carry out the tasks more competently. The ability to give attention to instructions is an important factor to be considered. This will enable the students to generate accurate work and efficient work.
McNicals observation in 1979 was that, in the act of any skill, the skill the student is consciously or unconsciously, based his/her movements on obtained knowledge. If the learner does not know the significant basic knowledge in certain areas, his/her performance will be deficient in some of the characteristics of the skill expected.
Irving on 1985 argued on the issue of study skills, that, the teaching of study skills has become a main issue. It was noticed over the years that despite the methods and materials of the teaching/learning process, many pupils are still unable to improve their learning.
25
In 1957 Whitson states that clinical experience is the heart of the nurses education. The information which the nursing
student reads in a textbook, the lectures she hears in the class, and the experiments she observes in the laboratory must be combined in the clinical area. The nursing student gains
II.
Brain Hemisphere Dominance The human brain is composed of two hemispheres. The left hemisphere receives motor and sensory input from the right side of the body, and the right hemisphere receives input from the left side of the body. When we bring the two systems together and begin the task of developing harmony and synchrony, the first step is to achieve an efficient balance between the two sides of the brain. Because most mental processes involve both sides of the brain, integration problems between the two hemispheres can result in inefficiencies in brain processes. The idea that the two hemispheres are specialized for dissimilar modes of thought has led to the concept of
26
which is the idea that a given individual relies more on one mode or hemisphere than on the other. As defined by Bradshaw & Nettleton (1981); McCarthy (1996); Springer & Deutsch (1993), brain hemisphericity is the trend of an individual to process information through the left hemisphere or the right hemisphere or in combination. This differential utilization is assumed to be reflected in the individuals cognitive style-the persons
preferences and approach to problem-solving. A tendency to use verbal or analytical approaches to problems is seen as proof of left-side hemisphericity, whereas those who favor holistic or spatial ways of dealing with information are seen as righthemisphere people. Ball (1884) stated: "Indeed, the important point . . . is not at all the preponderance of the left hemisphere over the right hemisphere; it is the superiority of one of the two halves of the organ [over the other]. In general, man chooses the left brain, in a few exceptional cases, he gives preference to the right side; but the thing that is necessary to establish, above all , is that man is not at all naturally ambidextrous like the animals; he is essentially unilateral. "
27
On the other hand there is an investigation of the specialized functions of the two hemispheres which suggested a new way to conceptualize hemispheric differences. Instead of a breakdown based on the category of tasks (for example, verbal or spatial) best performed by each hemisphere, a dichotomy based on different ways of dealing with information in general seemed to surface.
Jackson in 1868 proposed his idea of the leading hemisphere-a concept that may be viewed as the precursor of the idea of cerebral dominance. The two brains cannot be mere duplicates, Jackson further concluded that in most people the left side of the brain is the leading side-the side of the so-called will, and that the right is the automatic side.
Discoveries formed the basis of a widely held vision of the connection between the two hemispheres. One hemisphere, usually the left in right-handers, was seen as the director of speech and other advanced functions; the right, or minor, hemisphere, was without unique functions and subordinate to control by the dominant left. The derivation of the term cerebral dominance is obscure, but it captures nicely the idea of
28
one-half of the brain directing behavior. Even if the concept originally associated with this term underestimates the role of the right hemisphere, cerebral dominance is still widely used at present.
Regarding on how dominance came about, there are various explanations. One is about anatomical and organ
composition differences which include: 1. Notions on posterior versus frontal lobe functioning according to Exner (1881), 2. Structural asymmetries between the two hemispheres, which tended to be most pronounced in the spheno-temporal regions according to Luys (1879), Cunningham (1892) and Ebertaller (1890), 3. Weight difference between the two sides of the brain according to Boyd (1861), Thurman (1866), Broca (1866,1875), and van Biervliet (1899), 4. Blood-supply of the brain by de Fleury (1865) and Ogle (1871), which is in line with the carotid arteries asymmetry according to Broca (1877), Harris (1980), 6. The amount of grey and white matter according to Roques (1869), 7. There is also a study that states that there is a lateral differences in the brains composition according to Parrot (1879). Other theories involved developmental consideration which includes posterior versus frontal lobe development according to
29
Ecker (1868), and developmental differences between the frontal (and occipital) lobes of the two hemispheres according to Broca (1865). "Brain Dominance" is said to build up during childhood. This conclusion is affected by genetics, childhood experiences, and family environment. As Emerson in 1996 states that all theories suppose you are born either left or right brained and will not change. The event is three fold: 1. Born with it-gender and genes, 2. Environmental, 3. Choices made. The extent to which you are left or right brained, depends on the combination of these three, but the results are still left or right brained. But
according to recent studies by NBI it is possible to develop preferences and skills in any quadrant. In support to Emerson the HHMI investigator Christopher A. Walsh, postdoctoral fellow Tao Sun, and their colleagues at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, in 2005, found a gene called LM04 is expressed differently in the cerebral cortex in the left brain, compared to the right brain, may help recognize how in most people, one side of the brain achieves dominance over the other. It means that fine
30
differences in how a single gene works on opposite sides of the growing brain may clarify how various intellectual talents language, math skills, imagination -arise in specific sides of the brain in most people. Though Emerson said that one is born with his/her own BHD, it doesnt mean that it cannot change. According to NBI one is born with roughly 20-30% preference, while 70-80% develop through social and environmental interaction which led them to conclude that brain profile may change, but only if there are well-built reasons for this to arise. This may occur over a
long period of time because of changing interests, hobbies, environments and mentors. In rare cases changes occur over a short period of time because of momentous events or major lifestyle changes. Such brain profile changes maybe temporary. Kinsbourne in 1986 hypothesizes that the development of cerebral hemispheric tendency evolves by increases in
proficiency and, in each hemisphere, learning to give attention to contralateral stimuli. In several studies undertaken to verify this thesis, it was observed that giving the left lobe a verbal task reduced the left eye field superiority for recognizing faces; additionally, presenting a face recognition problem to the right
31
lobe reduced the' right field visual superiority for words. Therefore, one way to counteract a tendency for, left-
hemispheric dominance is to "prime" the right hemisphere's "pump" by looking at pictures or listening to music. Likewise, for the right-hemisphere dominant person, reading a book or listening to a lecture will set the stage for left hemisphere activity. In such a way one can momentarily lessen the dominance of one side of the brain and allow greater freedom for the other to apply itself cognitively (with its own separate data encoding system) to a problem. In relation to gender as a factor on BHD, there is an insight that the right side of the brain should become the female side of the brain. Quite early on, Victor Meunier had asserted his belief that there are between the respective modes of activity of the left brain and the right brain, differences analogous to those currently existing between the respective modes of activity of the male brain and that of the female (Delaunay, 1874).
In addition Joseph Buchanan in 1850 also had disputed for the relative masculinity and femininity of the left and right hemispheres. Based on certain craniological facts he had
32
gathered
himself,
his
vision
of
complementary masculine/feminine functioning between the two brain halves. As he explained, When you examine the head of a right-handed man, you will find that the left hemisphere is the best developed, particularly in those portions which give muscular power and energy of character.
Moreover in 1871 Armand de Fleury had also called the right hemisphere female and the left male. Indeed, there seemed to have been a feeling among at least some neurologists that assigning genders to the two hemispheres of the brain was one suitable way of summing up their particular characteristics. Klippel (1898) still find it being said that the terms male
hemisphere and feminine hemisphere should render rather well the differences in nature between the two brains, of which one, more intellectual, is more stable, and of which the other, more excitable, is also more readily exhausted. Appendix D shows the verbal and spatial tasks for which there are sex differences in performance.
33
The left side of the brain develops information in a linear approach. It process from part to whole. It takes pieces, lines them up, and assembles them in a logical order; then it draws conclusions. The right brain, though, processes from whole to part, holistically. It begins with the answer. It sees the big picture first, not the details. A right-brained person may have trouble following a lecture unless they are given the big picture first. That is why according to Dr. Carolyn Hopper in 2003 said that it is absolutely necessary for a right-brained person to read an assigned chapter or background information before a lecture or to survey a chapter before reading. If an instructor doesn't consistently give an overview before he or she begins a lecture, a right brained person may need to ask at the end of class what the next lecture will be and how he/she can prepare for it. If one is predominantly right-brained, they may also have trouble outlining. They are the student who needs to be familiar with why they are doing something. Left-brained students would do well to exercise their right-brain in such a manner. In addition to thinking in a linear manner, the left brain processes in sequence. The left-brained person is a list maker. Left-brained people would take pleasure in making a master schedule and doing daily planning. They finish tasks in order and
34
take pleasure in checking them off when they are accomplished. Likewise, learning things in sequence is relatively easy for them. The left brain is also at work in the linear and sequential processing of math and in following directions. By contrast, the approach of the right-brained student is random. Right-brained people may flit from one task to another. They will get just as much done but perhaps without having to attend priorities. An assignment may be behind schedule or incomplete, not because they weren't working, but because they were working on something else. They were prepared to rebel when asked to make study schedules for the week. But because of the random nature of their dominant side, they must make lists, and must make schedules. They should also make a special effort to read directions. Spelling is also a concern so they must not hesitate to use the dictionary. Because the right side of the brain is color sensitive, they might try using colors to learn sequence. Practicing everything in-order can help right brained people. If they consistently use the same sequence, they will
35
The left brain has no trouble dealing with symbols. The leftbrained person has a tendency to be comfortable with linguistic and mathematical endeavors. Left-brained students will probably just memorize vocabulary words or math formulas. The right brain, on the other hand, wants things to be concrete. The rightbrained person wants to see, feel, or touch the real object. Rightbrained students may have had trouble learning to read using phonics. They prefer to see words in context and to see how the formula works. To use ones right brain, create opportunities for hands-on activities. Use something real whenever possible. They may also want to draw out a math problem or illustrate their notes. The left brain processes in a linear, sequential, logical manner. When one process on the left side, they use information piece by piece to solve a math problem or work out a science experiment. When they read and listen, they look for the pieces so that they can draw logical conclusions. Their decisions are made on logic and proof. If one process primarily on the right side of the brain, they use intuition. They may know the right answer to a math problem but not be sure how they got it. They may have to start with the answer and work backwards. On a
36
quiz, they have a gut feeling as to which answers are correct, and they are usually right. In writing, it is the left brain that pays attention to mechanics such as spelling, agreement, and punctuation. But the right side pays attention to coherence and meaning; that is, their right brain tells them it "feels" right. Their decisions will be based on feelings. Left-brained students have little trouble expressing
themselves in words. Right-brained students may know what they mean but often have trouble finding the right words. The best illustration of this is to listen to people give directions. The left-brained person will say something like "From here, go west three blocks and turn north on Vine Street. Go three or four miles and then turn east onto Broad Street." The right-brained person will sound something like this: "Turn right (pointing right) by the church over there (pointing again). Then you will pass a McDonalds and a Walmart. At the next light, turn right toward the BP station." So how is this relevant to planning study strategies? Right-brained students need to back up everything visually. If it's not written down, they probably won't remember it. And it would be even better for right-brained students to illustrate it. They need to get into the habit of making a mental
37
video of things as they hear or read them. Right-brained students need to know that it may take them longer to write a paper, and the paper may need more revision before it says what they want it to say. This means allowing extra time when a writing assignment is due.
The left side of the brain deals with things the way they are-with reality. When left-brained students are affected by the environment, they usually adjust to it. Not so with right-brained students; they try to change the environment. Left-brained people want to know the rules and follow them. In fact, if there are no rules for situations, they will probably make up rules to follow. Left-brained students know the consequences of not turning in papers on time or of failing a test, but right-brained students are sometimes not aware that there is anything wrong. So, if one is a right-brained, make sure that they constantly ask for feedback and reality checks. It's too late the day before finals to ask if you can do extra credit. Keep a careful record of their assignments and tests. Visit with their professor routinely. While this fantasy orientation may seem a disadvantage, in some cases it is an advantage. The right-brained student is creative. In order to learn about the digestive system, you may decide to become
38
a piece of food. And since emotion is processed on the right side of the brain, you will probably remember well anything you become emotionally involved in as you are trying to learn. Appendix E shows illustrations of having a left -right BHD.
B. Bilateral BHD Whole-brain dominants are those who process information through both hemispheres equally and exhibit characteristics of both hemispheres and those individuals have flexible use of both hemispheres according to McCarthy (1996). Since hemispheric predispositions are not only genetic but also to a great extent learned, it seems reasonable to assume that a change in environmental conditions could lead to the possibility of change in our style of cognitive functioning. To some degree one may have to live with a tendency toward either the right- or lefthemisphere style of information encoding. But it is possible to create conditions within our environments and schedules
whereby the fullest possible use is made of all our cognitive capacities. A balanced brain according to The Center for Academic Success Louisiana State University (2009) means that he or she
39
is able to gain strengths of both the right and left hemispheres of his or her brain, depending upon a given situation. This combination makes him or her think both in a creative and flexible manner which brings about proficiency in several different areas. However in having a more balanced brain
brings uncertainty because the two hemispheres of brain are competing to solve a problem in their own unique ways.
C. On School Performance Dr. Carolyn Hopper (2003) said that when learning is new, difficult or stressful one prefers to learn in a certain way. It seems that the brain goes on autopilot to the favored side. And while nothing is entirely isolated on one side of the brain or the other, the characteristics commonly attributed to each side of the brain serve as a suitable guide for ways of learning things more capably and ways of reinforcing learning. Just as it was more important for our purposes to determine that memory is stored in many parts of the brain rather than learn the exact lobe for each part, similarly it is not so much that one is biologically right brain or left brain dominant, but that they are more at ease with the learning strategies characteristics of one over the other.
40
What they are doing is lengthening their list of strategies for learning how to learn and trying to determine what works best.
Contemporary understanding of human brain functions establishes that each brain is unique and that brains in general are specialized. When combined, the concepts of specialization and asymmetry of dominance produce within each human being a distribution of specialized preferences that influence general behavior. Specifically incorporated is the individual's distinctive learning style. An instant implication for the education and training profession is that the assumptions about the learner must now be completely reconsidered. As Howard Gardner describes it, intelligence is no longer one dimensional, but somewhat includes the notion of multiple intelligences. Each individual is now being thought of as a distinctive learner with learning preferences different from other learners. This means that learning designs must somehow factor in the uniqueness of the individual learner. This way, the subject matter will be equally understood by all the participants in the learning experience, not only in terms of comprehension, but also in terms of intended meaning.
41
According to Boyle & Dunn (1998), McCarthy (1996), Shiflett (1989), Torrance (1982) said that brain hemisphericity greatly influences the individual's learning style and all kinds of intellectual and personality characteristics. It is stated by Boyle & Dunn (1998), Dunn, Sklar, Beaudry, & Bruno (1990) that research has demonstrated that students are capable of mastering new skills if they are taught through instructional preference. In addition to that Brennan (1984), Dunn, Sklar, Beaudry & Bruno (1990), Jarsonbeck (1984), also stated that several studies have found that students taught through methods that matched their hemispheric styles achieved statistically significant higher test scores than when they were taught through other teaching methods. To incorporate other researchers study and view on BHD, Herrmann developed a model that differs in design and delivery approaches. He improved and facilitated learning in each of methods that complement their hemispheric
these four specialized quadrants. In line with Herrmanns model, Kobus Neethling, who first developed the NBI, developed a
42
model regarding whole brain teaching, learning and personal development. Appendix F shows different models on learning and teaching based on BHD technologies.
Research Literature OVERVIEW This part of the thesis contains foreign and local studies gathered by the researchers of its association of BHD into the field of education. Similarities and differences of these studies with the researchers study are then discussed in the synthesis part. Foreign Research BRAIN HEMISPHERICITY AND ACADEMIC MAJORS: A
CORRELATION STUDY by AMANY SALEH (2001) This study explores the correlation between the students selection of academic majors and their brain hemisphericity. There are 429 respondents-both graduates and undergraduates, in a large university in southern part of the United States. Analysis of variance was applied to the data in order to determine the influence of brain
43
hemisphericity on students' preference of academic majors. The results provided support to earlier research which proved in their findings that there is a strong correlation between academic majors and brain dominance. Research revealed that arts/literature students are likely to be right brained while business/commerce students were left brained. Students majoring in education, nursing, communication, and law were right brained, while students majoring in
business/commerce, engineering, and science were left brained. The study also established an evidence of a general shift in students brain hemisphericity from earlier research, where more students were identified as whole brained. Research has confirmed the importance of considering brain behavior as it relates to learning styles and personality traits. This study examines the relationship between brain hemisphericity and college students' choice of academic majors. The results of this research should help teachers, school counselors, and college advisors to better comprehend their students' interests and abilities and guide them towards fields or academic majors that are well-suited with their interests.
44
THE EFFECT OF BRAIN HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE ON LEARNING BY COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION AND THE TRADITIONAL LECTURE METHOD BY BENEDICT S.C. AND COFFIELD K . (1989) This study is about the reports of brain hemisphere dominances influence on learning styles in a way, people have a tendency to be categorized as left brain-dominant and right brain-dominant. The objective of the study was to examine the effect of brain hemisphere dominance on learning by Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) and the traditional lecture method. This study used Wagner Preference Inventory to determine brain hemisphere dominance. Content related to the use of Roman numerals was presented using both CAI and the lecture method. A two-way analysis of variance revealed an interaction effect between brain hemisphere dominance and teaching method. Right hemisphere-dominant subjects scored higher on the posttest in the CAI group, and left hemisphere-dominant subjects scored higher in the lecture group.
STUDY
ON
THE
THINKING
STYLES
AND
ACADEMIC
45
This is a study by the Department of Civil and Biosystems Engineering of the University of Pretoria in order to determine the thinking preferences of first year civil engineering students.
Information was gathered through survey from student intakes during the period 1999 to 2001 for the study, it also included the lecturing staff using the HBDI developed by Ned Herrmann. The results confirmed a predominantly left-brain bias among the students and the lecturing staff. The academic records of the students were correlated with these thinking preferences and the results illustrated that the predominantly left-brain preference students performed better than the right-brained students. The significance of the results are related to curriculum changes, lecturing style and implications of admission criteria as well as the needs expressed by industry for the
incorporation of non-technical or softer skills. The researchers used 100 first year civil engineering students as subjects in a three-year period with 13 of the lecturing staff of the department of Civil and Biosystems Engineering. An analysis of these students profiles showed differences in thinking style preferences amongst the individual civil engineering students in the group. Although differences showed in their profiles, on average these profiles tended to be triple dominant with the primaries in quadrants A, B and D and the secondary in C.
46
This study as well as the studies at the University of Toledo in America (Lumsdaine & Lumsdaine 1995b) revealed that more than one fifth of male students studying engineering tend to avoid the C quadrant. These students will have difficulty functioning as members of multi disciplinary teams in industry. Lecturers at the Department Civil and Bio-systems Engineering has a result of a 1-1-2-1 profile which indicates a structured and sequential thinking. Through the implementation of a four-quadrant whole brain facilitation framework, methods to improve the non-technical skills will be developed. Lumsdaine et al. (1995a) report that they achieved a significant rise in average D-quadrant thinking preference with engineering students from first year to final year. They state that students who think differently can be identified with the HBDI and given special guidance to persist to graduation and needs to be accommodated to be able to gather the full potential that came from diversity.
The result of this study is an indication that the Department Civil and Bio-systems Engineering is still in need of change and to experience a further paradigm shift as industry demands. Beder (1998) described that the industry is in need of the new engineer. The study spans the changeover from the old curriculum to the new curriculum (introduced in 2001). It all comes down to the fact that the
47
departments are in danger of training students with a prejudiced curriculum, still focused on technical and analytical aspects resulting in potentially ill-equipped engineers as opposed to what the industry really needs today.
THE
EFFECT
OF
LEFT
VS.
RIGHT
BRAIN
HEMISPHERE
DOMINANCE ON THE LEARNING CURVES OF REPETITIVE HANDEYE COORDINATION TESTS SPRING VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL BY ARLEN CHEN (2002) This study aims to determine the effect of left and right brain hemisphere dominance on the learning curves of repetitive hand-eye coordination test in Spring Valley High School. Also, the study wants to discover which type of dominance results in the largest learning curve.
The researchers used computer, human subjects, survey form, hand-eye coordination test, left vs. right brain hemisphere dominance test and MINITAB 14.
The brain dominance had results relatively similar to each other and has definite learning curve therefore; the study concluded that the
48
brain hemisphere dominance revealed no relationship with learning curves according to hand-eye coordination.
Local Research BRAIN DOMINANCE AND LEARNING STYLES OF HIGHSCHOOL STUDENTS BY HELEN C. MADELA (2006) This study was made to know the existing brain dominance and the prevailing learning styles amidst high school students of Camarines Sur State Agricultural College (CSSAC)-Calabanga, school year 20052006. The research also looked into the differences in learning styles and the factor of analysis used is the brain dominance. Knowing the brain dominance and learning styles of the students, curriculum materials were made and suggested to suit the different learning needs of high school students. The method of research used was a descriptive survey. The statistical tools used to analyze the data are descriptive statistics including frequency counts, percentages and chi square. The instruments used for collecting the data were the questionnaire on brain dominance inventory and the learning style inventory both revised by Evelyn Davis. It gave answers to the problems of the research. This research concluded that small majority of high school students as left brain learning (out of 150 respondents, 56.7% were left brained, 30.7% right brained, 12% whole brained),
49
visual learning style predominates among high school students and brain dominance and learning styles are independent of each other.
BRAIN
DOMINANCE,
LEARNING
STYLE
AND
ACADEMIC
ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS AMONG FRESHMEN COLLEGE STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN BY ALFONSO SIMACIO MARQUELENCIA (2005) This study tries to seek students brain dominance, learning style and academic achievement. Respondents will include freshman
college students of the University of San Agustin. The study intends to present insights for the students, faculty, school administrators, guidance counselor, parents and curriculum planners on students learning styles and brain dominance. The researcher used descriptive co-relational research and employed a standardized brain dominancequestionnaire published by Human Resource Center of Ateneo de Manila University. The subjects were the 250 randomly selected freshmen college students of the first semester AY 2004-2005 of the University of San Agustin. Frequency count percentages, rank and mean were used for descriptive statistics; inferential statistics include standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, chi square, lambda. The significance level was set at 0.05. The results showed that majority of freshmen students were visual learners, left-brained and have a good
50
academic
achievement.
found
no
significant
relationships among variables employed in the study namely brain dominance, learning style and academic achievement.
THE LEARNING STYLE AND BRAIN DOMINANCE OF STUDENTS IN CEBU INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: PROPOSED ENRICHMENT FOR THE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA CENTER WHOLE LANGUAGE
PROGRAM BY JEOGENES BIONGCOG (1996) This study aims to determine the learning style and brain dominance of grades 2-12 students in Cebu International School (CIS) as bases for enhancing the whole language program implemented in its Educational Media Center (EMC). The responsibilities that were pursued were determining the learning styles of the students using a learning style inventory and ascertaining the brain dominance of students as classified in a brain dominance inventory. The outcomes of these inventories were then matched in congruence to whole language perspectives. In conclusion, an enrichment scheme was proposed to enhance the CIS EMC whole language program. A descriptive method was used. Instruments used were Barsch learning style inventory and brain dominance inventory as revised by Evelyn Davis. Findings
showed that majority is left brained, one third is right brained and 7% are whole brained. Variations of dominant visual and minority auditory
51
and tactile groups were seen. The study also showed that 55 of the respondents that are left-brained and 48 of the right brained is close to being whole brained.
SYNTHESIS Salehs study correlates a students selection of academic majors and brain hemisphericity. It is similar with the researchers study in the sense that it tries to correlate brain hemisphericity in the field of education and wanted the same purpose of comprehending and guiding students abilities. Salehs study deals with a greater
population of respondents who came from a university, both graduates and undergraduates of various courses. The researchers respondents only included graduating nursing students from a particular school year. As for the statistical treatment used, Saleh made use of analysis of variance while the researchers used chi square test. As for the
result, Saleh found a strong correlation between academic majors and brain hemisphericity. On the other hand the researchers founded a
correlation between academic performance and BHD but no correlation was established between BHD and skills/clinical performance. Basing the researchers findings, undergraduate nursing students in SISC tends to be left brainers, while in Salehs study conducted in a large
52
university in southern part of the United States students majoring in nursing tends to right brainers.
Benedict and Coffields study tries to find the effect of brain hemisphere dominance on learning style. It compared the different
teaching method namely CAI and the traditional learning method along with students performance. It is similar with the researchers study in the sense that it correlated performance with BHD. However in
determining the BHD of their respondents it made use of the Wagner Preference Inventory while the researchers used of the Brain
Dominance Questionnaire.
and Coffield used two-way analysis of variance while the researchers used chi square test. As for the result Benedict and Coffield found a correlation between the two variables. On the other hand the
researchers founded a correlation between academic performance and BHD but no correlation was established between BHD and skills/clinical performance. Basing the researchers study, left brainers have a
higher grades in their lecture, like Benedict and Coffield findings which reveal that left brainers excel in traditional lecture method.
Horak and Du Toits study wants to measure thinking preference in order to improve engineers being produced by the institution. It
53
made use of the HBDI while the researchers used of the Brain Dominance Questionnaire. It is similar with the researchers study in the sense that it wanted to gain findings on how the brain works and wanted to maximize the abilities of nursing students. Respondents
included freshmen students over three-year period as well as some lecturing staffs while the researchers included graduating nursing students from one particular school year only.
Chens study wanted to know if brain hemisphere dominance has an effect on the learning curve of repetitive hand-eye coordination and discover which type of dominance results in the largest learning curve. Respondents came from Spring Valley High School and made used of a computer, survey form, hand-eye coordination test, and MINITAB 14. Different test for determining brain dominance was used; it made use of the left vs. right brain hemisphere dominance test while the researchers made use of the Brain Dominance Questionnaire. It is
similar with the researchers study in the sense that it wanted to correlate brain function with a skill performance. Like Chens study the researchers didnt find correlation between a skill performance and brain dominance.
54
Madelas study investigates existing brain dominance and prevailing learning styles and to determine if brain dominance is a factor for the different learning style. In doing so curriculum
suggestions can be made in order to suit the different learning needs. It is similar with the researchers study in the sense that it wants to fill the needs of nursing students basing with their preference which can be determined using BHD. Madelas respondents included high school students from CSSAC-Calabanga, school year 2005-2006. On the other hand the researchers respondents included graduating nursing students from SISC school year 2008-2009. As for determining the
brain dominance, Madela used the brain dominance inventory, revised by Evelyn Davis while the researchers made use of the Brain Dominance Questionnaire. Same descriptive statistics (frequency
counts and percentages) and inferential statistics (chi square test) were both used by Madela and the researchers. Both of Madela and the researchers respondents are left brained dominant.
Marquelencias study is like the researchers study which is a descriptive correlational study between brain dominance and academic achievement with the addition of another variable which is learning style of students. Marquelencias respondents included freshmen
55
respondents are graduating nursing students from SISC, both from a particular school year. Marquelencia and the researchers used the
same tool for BHD testing-Brain Dominance Questionnaire published by Human Resource Center of Ateneo de Manila University. Some descriptive statistics (frequency counts, percentage, ranks) and inferential statistics (chi square test having a = 0.05) in
Results
showed that left brainers have a good academic achievement which is same with the researchers findings that left brained dominant nursing students tend to have higher grades in lecture. Marquelencias study found no significant relationship among the variables being studied while the researchers found a significant relationship between BHD and lecture performance.
Biongcogs study wanted to seek the learning style and brain dominance of student in order to enhance the whole language programs. Respondents included grades 2-12 students in CIS while the researchers included graduating nursing students from SISC.
Biongcogs study is similar with Madelas study because both used the brain dominance inventory, revised by Evelyn Davis while the researchers made use of the Brain Dominance Questionnaire. study showed that majority of the students are left brained. Both
56
OVERVIEW This is the chapter in which the theoretical and methodological aspects of the study are discussed. Research Design The design is a descriptive correlational study on the relationship between BHD and performance of nursing students in a nursing core subject.
Population: The study includes graduating BSN students of SISC batch 2009
Respondents of the Study The researchers used convenient sampling. Graduating BSN
students of SISC batch 2009 present on the day of BHD testing was included in the study.
Research Instrument Brain Dominance Questionnaire. This instrument was published by Human Resource Center of Ateneo de Manila University. The
57
derivation of this instrument is the Brain Dominance Indicator from Whole Brain Thinking by Jacquelyn Wonder and Priscilla Donovan in 1984. This research instrument determines ones primary brain It consists of 35 items. To obtain data on brain
dominance.
dominance, the researcher followed a scoring procedure on brain dominance. The encircled letter for each item represents the subjects score. The obtained scores for each item will be categorized-scores
ranging from 1-4 will indicate the left preference, a score of 6-9 will indicate the right brain preference, and a score of 5 will indicate preference to both sides of the brain. Then the number of scores for each brain preference will be summed up to show which side of the brain is more dominant with the respondents. If there is an equal
score, it will indicate that a person is mid-brained meaning his preference is for both sides of the brain. Appendix G shows the
Sample Brain Dominance Questionnaire and Appendix H shows the scoring key for Brain Dominance Questionnaire.
clinical performance, the researchers used the ratings of nursing students in their nursing core subject which are rounded off to their nearest decimal places.
58
subject, the researchers tabulated it with their BHD and made use of the SISCs grading system. System. See Appendix I for the SISC Grading
59
Administration of the Instrument BHD was tested. After BHD testing, the researchers followed the scoring procedure on brain dominance. After BHD profile was gained, it was tabulated and was submitted to the Deans office for coding of names along with their ratings. When the coded data was obtained, the only available data are the power grade (combined final lecture grade and final RLE grade) and final RLE grade, so final lecture grade was extracted from these two ratings [formula= POWER GRADE-RLE RAW SCORE (FINAL RLE GRADE MULITPLIED BY 50%) DIVIDED BY 50%]. After obtaining the final lecture grade, both Lecture and RLE grades are rounded off to their nearest decimal places. Then the researchers applied the appropriate statistical treatment.
percentages. Inferential statistics includes chi square test in order to test H01 and H02. See Appendix J for summary of computations of the chi square test
60
PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA OVERVIEW This chapter contains the gathered data, which includes the participants profile, interpretations and implications of the gathered data. This chapter presents the data gathered by the researchers to be able to answer the following specific questions: Specific Question No. 1. What is the profile of nursing students in terms of the following? 1.1. Gender Figure 1. Gender of nursing students
F a em le
M le a
Interpretation
61
Figure 1 shows 73 nursing students or 70.19 percent of the total population are female while 31 nursing students or 29.81 percent of the total population is male.
1.2 BHD
62
R h ig t
B t l ila era
Left
Interpretation Figure 2 shows that 56 nursing students or 53.85 percent of the total population has a left BHD, 44 or 42.31 percent of the total population has a right BHD, and 4 or 3.85 percent of the total population has a bilateral BHD.
1.3 Grade
63
1.3.1. Lecture
Interpretation Figure 3 shows that 49 or 47.12 percent of the total population has a grade description of satisfactory. 31 or 29.81 percent of the population has grade description of good. 17 or 16.35 percent of the population has grades description of fair. 6 or 5.77 percent of the
population has grade description of very good. 1 person or 0.01 percent of the population has grade description of passed while there were 0 percentage of groups from the grade description of failed and excellent.
64
Interpretation The figure 4 shows that 65 persons or 62.5 percent of the total population has grade description of good. 38 persons or 36.54 percent of the total population has grade description of satisfactory. Lastly, 1 person or 0.96% has a grade description of very good, groups from the grade description of failed and excellent all have 0 percentage.
65
1.4 Gender and BHD Figure 5. Gender of nursing students having left BHD
F a em le
M le a
Interpretation Figure 5 shows that 43 or 76.79 percent of the total population of students with left BHD are female and 13 persons or 23.21 percent of the total population of students with left BHD are male.
66
Gender
of
nursing
students
having
F a em le
M le a
Interpretation Figure 6 shows that 2 or 50 percent of the total population of students with bilateral BHD are female and 2 or 50 percent of the total population of students with bilateral BHD are male.
67
F a em le
M le a
Interpretation Figure 7 shows that 28 or 63.64 percent of the total population of students with right BHD are female and 16 or 36.36 percent of the total population of students with right BHD are male.
68
1.5 BHD and Grade 1.5.1. BHD and Lecture Grade Figure 8. Lecture Grades of nursing students who have left BHD
Ex cellent
Su perior
Very Good
Good
Satisfactory
Fair
Passed
Failed
Interpretation Figure 8 shows that 27 or 48.21 percent of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has grade description of satisfactory. 18 or 32.14 percent of the total population of nursing students with left
69
BHD has a grade description of good. 7 or 12.5 percent of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has a grade description of fair. 4 or 7.14 percent of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has a grade description of very good. While groups from
failed and excellent grade description has 0 percentage. Figure 9. Lecture Grades of nursing students who have bilateral BHD
Interpretation Figure 9 shows 2 persons or 50 percent of the total population of nursing students with bilateral BHD have grade description of satisfactory, 1 or 25 percent of the total population of nursing students with bilateral BHD has grade description of good, 1 or 25 percent of the total population of nursing students with bilateral BHD has grade
70
description of passed. Groups from failed and excellent grade description have 0 percentage.
Figure 10. Lecture Grades of nursing students who have right BHD
Interpretation Figure 10 shows that 22 or 50 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of satisfactory, 11 or 25 percent of the total population of nursing students with right
71
BHD has grade description of good, 9 or 20.455 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of fair, 2 or 4.55 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of very good, while groups from excellent and failed grade description has 0 percentage.
1.5.2. BHD and RLE Grade Figure 11. RLE Grades of nursing students who have left BHD
Interpretation
72
Figure 11 shows that 37 or 66.07 percent of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has grade description of good, 18 or 32.14 percent of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has grade description of satisfactory, 1 or 1.79% of the total population of nursing students with left BHD has grade description of very good, while groups from grade description of failed and excellent grade have 0 percentage.
Figure 12. RLE Grades of nursing students who have bilateral BHD
Interpretation
73
Figure 12 shows that 3 or 75 percent of the total population of nursing students with bilateral BHD has grade description of good. 1 or 25 percent of the total population of nursing students with bilateral has grade description of satisfactory, groups from grade description of failed and excellent have 0 percentage.
Figure 13. RLE Grades of nursing students who have right BHD
I nterpretation
74
Figure 13 shows that 25 or 53.19 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of good, 19 or 40.43 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of satisfactory, 3 or 6.38 percent of the total population of nursing students with right BHD has grade description of very good, groups with grade description of failed and excellent have 0 percentage.
Specific Question No. 2. Is there a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance rating in a nursing core subject? Table 1 Observed Value for Specific Question No. 2
Excelle nt Superi or Very Good Goo d Satisfacto ry Fai r Passe d Faile d
4 0 2 6
18 1 12 31
26 2 21 49
8 0 9 17
0 1 0 1
TOTA L 56 4 44 104
TOTAL
Table 2 Expected Value for Specific Question No. 2 Very Good 3.23 0.23 Goo d 16.6 9 1.19 Satisfacto ry 26.38 1.88 Fair 9.1 5 0.6 5 Passe d 0.54 0.04 TOTA L 56 4
LEFT BILATERA L
75
RIGHT TOTAL
0.42 1
44 104
(Computation for the chi square value for specific question no. 2 is in Appendix L) Interpretation Since chi square computed value is greater that chi square tabulated value we must reject specific question no. 2 or the researchers H01. This means that there is a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance rating in a nursing core subject.
Specific Question No. 3. Is there a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance rating in a nursing core subject? Table 3 Observed Value for Specific Question No. 3
Excelle nt Superi or Very Good Goo d Satisfacto ry Fai r Passe d Faile d
1 0 0 1
37 3 25 65
18 1 19 38
TOTA L 56 4 44 104
TOTAL
76
Bachelor of Science in Nursing Very Good 0.54 0.04 0.42 1 Goo d 35 2.5 27.5 65 Superi or 20.46 1.46 16.08 38
TOTA L 56 4 44 104
(Computation for the chi square value for specific question No. 3 is in Appendix M) Interpretation Since chi square computed value is lesser that chi square tabulated value we must accept specific question no. 3 or the researchers H02. This means that there is no significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance rating in a nursing core subject.
77
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW This chapter contains the highlights of the major points of the research study and the suggestions made by the researchers.
Summary This a descriptive correlational study aimed to find out the relationship of nursing students brain hemisphere dominance with their academic and clinical performance in a nursing core subject. The responses were tallied and chi square test was used as statistical treatment. The researchers concluded that there is a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance, no significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance and no significant relationship between BHD and their overall performance in a nursing core subject.
Major Findings Based on the results of the study, the following are the major findings: 1. Majority of the respondents are female. 2. Majority of the respondents have a left BHD. 3. Majority of the respondents who have a left BHD are female.
78
4. Majority of the respondents who have bilateral BHD are female. 5. Majority of the respondents who have a right BHD are female. 6. Majority of the respondents have lecture grade description of satisfactory. 7. Majority of the respondents have RLE grade description of good. 8. Majority of the respondents who have a left BHD have lecture grade description of satisfactory 9. Majority of the respondents who have a bilateral BHD have lecture grade description of satisfactory 10. Majority of the respondents who have a right BHD have a lecture grade of satisfactory 11. Majority of the respondents who have a left BHD have RLE grade description of good 12. Majority of the respondents who have a bilateral BHD have RLE grade description of good 13. Majority of the respondents who have a right BHD have RLE grade description of good
79
1. There is a significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their academic performance rating in a nursing core subject 1.1 Left-brained nursing students tend to have higher grades 2. There is no significant relationship between BHD of nursing students and their clinical performance rating in a nursing core subject
recommended: For the Nursing Faculty 1. Since RLE should supposed to be a practice of skills that defines right hemisphericity, some CIs tend to give quizzes which also entails the use of left hemisphere. Students that have dominance on either side tend to take advantage of quizzes/skills to get a better grade so thats why the researchers would like to recommend that RLE grading must be divided according to quizzes and skills to be more specific on left and right functioning. 2. Since the researchers concluded that SISC trains students to be more to be left brainers, the researchers would like to recommend teachers/professors to balance their teaching
80
strategies to further enhance the balance of left and right brain function. For Future Researchers: 1. Since the study doesnt prove that there is a relationship between RLE and BHD, the researchers would like to recommend to focus on respondents that have RLE grades that was given by the same CIs which handled the students in the same areas at an equal number of rotations, considering the ceiling grade, for BHD to have a consistent baseline. 2. Since the study was performed in SISC and by nursing students, the respondents would like to recommend supporting and enhancing the result of the study by performing BHD testing in other schools or set of students of their choice and to consider doing the study for with a long span of time. 3. Since the study proved that there is a relationship between lecture performance and BHD, the researchers would like to recommend focusing in the left brain functioning to further support the result. 4. Recommend the use of other BHD tool and statistical treatment appropriate for the study in order to test if it will yield different result/s. But as far as lecture performance is concern, the same tools (Brain Dominance Questionnaire, SISC grading system,
81
nursing student ratings) and same statistical treatment (chi square test) is recommended for replication of the study. For the Institution Recommend to produce a committee that will do an extensive study on the brain hemisphericity of students.
82
Books: Burnham, V.S. & Hampton, H. (1992). Knowing yourself. Connecticut: Sundial Buzan, T. (1993). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximized your brains untapped potential. New York: Penguin Group Caine, R.N & Caine, G. (1990). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Nashville: Incentive Publications Collin, R. & Malcolm, N. (1997). Accelerated learning for the 21st century: The six-step plan to unlock your master-mind. New York: Dell Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books Harrington, A. (1987). Medicine, mind, and double brain. New Jersey: Princeton University
Herrmann, N. (1988). The creative brain. Africa: Brain Books Hopper, C. (2003). Practicing college study skills: strategies for success. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company Hoyt, D.P. (1971). The encyclopedia of education. New York: The Free Press
83
Jex, F.B. (1966). Predicting academic success beyond highschool. Salt Lake: University of Utah Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Malmquist, C. (1978). Handbook of adolescence: Psychopathology, antisocial development, psychotherapy.New York: Jason Aronson Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University McCarthy, J. (1996). Making robots conscious of their mental states. Oxford: Oxford University Medina, J. (2008). Brain rules: 12 principles for survival and thriving at work, home and school. Seattle: Pearpress Miles, H.B. (1979). Some factors affecting attainment at 18+: Study of performance in british schools. Oxford: Pergamon Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Penguin Group Roam, D. (2005). The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. New York: Penguin Group Rossi, P.H. (1961). Education, economy and society. New York: Free Press Russell, P. (1979). The Brain Book. New York: Penguin Group
84
Springer, S.P. & Deutsch, G. (1993). Left brain, right brain, 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company Stone, H. (1996). Theological context for pastoral caregiving: Word in deed. New York:The Hawthorn Pastoral Tuckman, B.W. (1975). Measuring educational outcomes: Fundamentals of testing.Unknown Walburton, F.W. (1952). The selection of university students. Manchester: Manchester University Wonder, J. & Donovan, P. (1984). Whole brain thinking: Working from both sides of the brain to achieve peak job performance. New York: Ballantine Books Articles/Journals: Benedict, S.C. & Coffield, K. (1989). The effect of brain hemisphere dominance on learning by computer assisted instruction and the traditional lecture method, Computers in Nursing, 7(4):152-6 Carvajal, J.C. (1991). Teaching through brain dominance technology, PHILIPPINE JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, January 1991 Cole, D. (1977). Grade expectations as a function of sex, academic discipline and sex of instructor, Psychol. Women Quart., 4:380384 Dew, J.R. (1996). Are you a right-brain or left-brain thinker?, Quality Progress Magazine, April 1996, 91-93
85
Geschwind, N. (1979). Specializations of the human brain, Scientific American, 241(3), 180-199 Harris, C.W. (1980). Factors affecting college grades: A review of the literature, Psychol. Bull., 37:125-166 Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain, Scientific American, September 1992 Komarovsky, M. (1973). Cultural contradiction and sex roles: The masculine case, Amer J. Sociol., 78:873-874 Lecompte, D., Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P. & Tassin, A. (1983). Search for the relationship between academic performance and some psychosocial factors: The use of a structured interview, Acta psychiatric Belgica., 83: 598-608 McClusky, H. (2005). Cognitive performance and mental ability: Implications for learning in the later years, Innovative Higher Education, 5(1):18-29 Saleh, A. (2001). Brain hemisphericity and academic majors: A correlation study - statistical data included , College Student Journal, June 2001 Singh. A. (2002). Behaviouralperceptions of design and construction engineers, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(2), 66-80
86
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2009). Search for the relationship between academic performance and some psychosocial factors: The use of a structured interview, Acta psychiatrica Belgica, 83(6), 598-608 U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2009). The effect of brain hemisphere dominance on learning by computer assisted instruction and the traditional lecture method, Computers in Nursing, 7(4), 152-6 Whitson, B. (1957). On becoming a nurse, The ANPHI PAPERS, AprilJune 1957
Unpublished Materials/ Dissertations Bachelor of Science in Nursing Curriculum. CHED Memorandum Order No. 30, 2001 Benedict S.C & Coffield K. (1989). THE EFFECT OF BRAIN HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE ON LEARNING BY COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION AND THE TRADITIONAL LECTURE METHOD Biongcog, J. (1996). THE LEARNING STYLE AND BRAIN DOMINANCE OF STUDENTS IN CEBU INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: PROPOSED ENRICHMENT FOR THE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA CENTER WHOLE LANGUAGE PROGRAM
87
Chen, A. (2002). THE EFFECT OF LEFT VS. RIGHT BRAIN HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE ON THE LEARNING CURVES OF REPETITIVE HANDEYE COORDINATION TESTS SPRING VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL Herrmann, N. (1990). THE WHOLE BRAIN/ FOUR QUADRANT MODEL Horak, E. & Du Toit, J.W.(2003). A STUDY ON THE THINKING STYLES AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS Lecompte, D., Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P. & Tassin, A. (1983). SEARCH FOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND SOME PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS: THE USE OF A STRUCTURED INTERVIEW Madela, H.C. (2006). BRAIN DOMINANCE AND LEARNING STYLES OF HIGHSCHOOL STUDENTS Marquelencia, A.S. (2005). BRAIN DOMINANCE, LEARNING STYLE AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS AMONG FRESHMEN COLLEGE STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN Saleh, A. (2001). BRAIN HEMISPHERICITY AND ACADEMIC MAJORS: A CORRELATION STUDY Southville International School and Colleges. (SY 2006-2007). College of Nursing: STUDENT HANDBOOK
88
Sperry, R. & Colleagues. THE TWO BRAIN THEORY: LATERALIZATION IN THE SEPARATE HEMISPHERES Websites: Balametrics, Inc. (2004). Balance as the central component. http://www.balametrics.com/explain.htm Bekker, H. (2003). A study on the thinking styles and academic performance of civil engineering students. http://buildnet.csir.co.za/cdcproc/docs/3rd/horak_e_du_toit_jw.pdf Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. (2005). Left- or right-brain? Genes may tell the story. http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/medicinehealth/articles/left-or-right-brain-genes-may-tell-story Bourne, P.A. (2005). A theoretical overview of academic performance. http://able2know.org/topic/47490-1 Caine, R.N & Caine, G. (1990). The triune brain. http://www.buffalostate.edu/orgs/bcp/brainbasics/triune.html Carey, H. (2009). Accelerated learning 2.0. http://www.slideshare.net/hccarey/accelerated-learning Chen, A. (2002). The effect of left vs. right brain hemisphere dominance on the learning curves of repetitive hand-eye
89
coordination tests spring valley high school. http://iotastraphy.net/ARLEN/2006/Research2/Presentation.ppt Hopper, C. (2003). Left vs. right: Which side are you on?. http://www.webus.com/brain/LRBrain.html Hopper, C. (2003). The study skills help page learning strategies for success. http://frank.mtsu.edu/~studskl/hd/LRBrain.html Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2005). Left-or right-brain?: Genes may tell the story. http://www.hhmi.org/news/walsh2.html Joshi, R. (2006). Left brain vs. right brain. http://www.citehr.com/40904-post14.html Kazlev, M.A. (2003). The four quadrant model of the brain:Ned Herrmann's whole brain model. http://www.kheper.net/topics/intelligence/Herrmann.htm Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. http://www.dhushara.com/book/socio/kimura/kimura.htm Lane, D.M. (2006). Computing the chi square test of independence. http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/B150868.html Morris, R. (2007). Left brain, right brain, whole brain? : An examination into the theory of brain laterilization, learning styles and the implications for education. http://www.singsurf.org/brain/rightbrain.html Ned Herrmann Group. (1996). Theories of brain organization.
90
http://www.cobw.com/Brain%20PDFs/Theories%20of%20Brain %20Organization.pdf Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd. (2000). NBI. http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/ Nehdi, A.H. (2002). Training with the brain in mind: The application of brain dominance technology to teaching and learning. http://www.hbdi.com/home/friendlyDownload.cfm? directory=100024_articles&actualFile=100176.pdf&saveName= Training-With-The-Brain-In-Mind.pdf Peters, R.A. (2008). Learn to use authentic and effective communication. http://www.robin-ann.com/2008/03/learn-to-use-authentic-andeffective.html Pytel, B. (2006). Left brains and right brains: We need both in this world--They compliment each other. http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/left_brains_and _right_brains Pytel, B. (2006). Right/left brain background. http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/rightleft_brain_ background
91
Saleh, A. (2001). Brain hemisphericity and academic majors: A correlation study-statistical data included. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCR/is_2_35/ai_77399626/
Singh. A. (2002). Behavioural perceptions of design and construction engineers. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsess ionid=F89636FAE4F90F340F4CFAF3D101DAC3? contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkpdf&contentId=1657473 Stout, J.H. (2008). Brain lateralization. http://members.tripod.com/david_gregory/lateralization.htm Templeton, M. (2009). Learning styles. http://frank.mtsu.edu/~studskl/hd/learn.html The Wealthy Daughter. LLC. (2009). Brain facts: Brain hemispheres. http://www.thrivingbrain.com/brain_facts/brain_hemispheres.htm U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2009). Search for the relationship between academic performance and some psychosocial factors: The use of a structured interview. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6673523
92
University of Michigan Health System. (2009). Brain dominance indicator. http://www.med.umich.edu/leadership/training/masters/assessm ents.htm Vidyasril1953. (2006). Functional areas of our brain. http://www.slideshare.net/vidyasri1953/functional-areas-of-ourbrain Whole Brain Thinking Pty Ltd. Whole brain thinking. http://www.wholebrainthinking.com.au/faq.htm Wikipedia. (2009). Dominance (genetics). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_(genetics) Wikipedia. (2009). Ned Hermann. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Herrmann
93
APPENDICES
Appendix A:
94
95
[From Bekker, H., A study on the thinking styles and academic performance of civil engineering students., http://buildnet.csir.co.za/cdcproc/docs/3rd/ horak_e_du_toit_jw.pdf, 2003, All rights reserved.] Appendix B:
96
[From Peters, R.A., Learn to use authentic and effective communication, http://www.robin-ann.com/2008/03/learn-to-useauthentic-and-effective.html, 2008, All rights reserved.] Appendix C:
97
[Adapted from the Bachelor of Science in Nursing Curriculum. CHED Memorandum Order No. 30, 2001] Appendix D: Verbal and Spatial Tasks for which there are Sex Differences in Performance
98
Problem-Solving Tasks Favoring Women Women tend to perform better than men on tests of perceptual speed, in which subjects must rapidly identify matching items for example, pairing the house on the far left with its twin:
Problem-Solving Tasks Favoring Men Men tend to perform better than women on certain spatial tasks. They do well on tests that involve mentally rotating an object or manipulating it in some fashion, such as imagining turning this threedimensional object
In addition, women remember whether an object, or a series of objects, has been displaced:
or determining where the holes punched in afolded piece of paper will fall when the paper is unfolded:
On some tests of ideational fluency, for example, those in which subjects must list objects that are the same color, and on tests of verbal fluency, in which participants must list words that begin with the same
Men also are more accurate than women in targetdirected motor skills, such as guiding or intercepting projectiles:
99
Women do better on precision manual tasks-that is, those in volving finemotor cqordina tion-such as placing the pegs in holes on a board:
They do better on disembedding tests, in which they have to find a simple shape, such as the one on the left, once it is hidden within a more complex figure:
100
[From Kimura, D., Sex differences in the brain, Scientific American, 1992, All rights reserved.] Appendix E.1: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
[From
Vidyasril,
Functional
areas
of
our
brain,
101
http://www.slideshare.net/vidyasri1953/functional-areas-of-our-brain, 2006. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.2: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
[From
Carey,
H.,
Accelerated
learning
102
2.0,http://www.slideshare.net/hccarey/accelerated-learning, 2009. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.3: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
[From
Vidyasril,
Functional
areas
of
our
brain,
103
http://www.slideshare.net/vidyasri1953/functional-areas-of-our-brain, 2006. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.4: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
104
[From Vidyasril, Functional areas of our brain, http://www.slideshare.net/vidyasri1953/functional-areas-of-our-brain, 2006. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.5: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
105
[From Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd., NBI, http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/, 2000. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.6: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
106
[From Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd., NBI, http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/, 2000. All rights reserved.] Appendix E.7: Illustration of having a Left-Right BHD
107
[From Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd., NBI, http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/, 2000. All rights reserved.]
108
Appendix F.1: Different Models on Learning and Teaching Based on BHD Technologies
[From Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd., NBI, http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/, 2000. All rights reserved.]
109
Appendix F.2: Different Models on Learning and Teaching Based on BHD Technologies
110
[From Neethling, K. & Solutions finding (Pty) Ltd., NBI, http://www.wholebrainthinking.au/, 2000. All rights reserved.] Appendix F.3: Different Models on Learning and Teaching Based on BHD Technologies
[From Nehdi, A.H., Training with the brain in mind: The application of brain dominance technology to teaching and learning., http://www.hbdi.com/home/friendlyDownload.cfm?
111
directory=100024_articles&actualFile=100176.pdf&saveName=Trainin g-With-The-Brain-In-Mind.pdf, 2002. All rights reserved.] Appendix G: Sample Brain Dominance Questionnaire
F Age:______
Please do not analyze the questions. Answer them quickly; encircle the answer that first feels right to you. When there are multiple choices, select the one that most closely represents your attitude or behavior. 1. In a problem solving situation, do you: a. take a walk and deliberate solutions over, then discuss them?. b. think about, write down all alternative, arrange them according to priorities, and then pick the best. c. recall past experiences that were successful and implement them? d. wait to see if the situation will right itself? 2. Daydreaming is: a. a waste of time b. amusing and relaxing c. a real help in problem solving and creative thinking d. a capable tool for planning my future 3. Glance quickly at this picture
Is the face smiling? a. yes b. no 4. Concerning hunches/guesses: a. I frequently have a strong ones and follow them b. I have a strong hunches/guesses but don't consciously follow them. c. I occasionally have hunches/guesses but don't place much faith in them. d. I would not rely on hunches/guesses to help me make important decisions. 5. In thinking about the activities of your day, which most typical of your "style" a. I make a list of all the things I need to do, people to see b. I picture the places I will go, people Ill see, things Ill do
112
c. I just let it happen d. I plan the day's schedule, blocking out appropriate times for each item or activity. 6. Do you usually have a place for everything, a system for doing things, and an ability to organize information and materials? a. yes b. no 7. Do you like to move your furniture, change the decor of your home or office frequently? a. yes b. no 8. Please check which if these activities do you enjoy (Select all that apply): [ ] swimming [ ] tennis [ ] golf [ ] camping/hiking [ ] skiing [ ] fishing [ ] singing [ ] gardening [ ] playing instrument [ ] home improvements [ ] sewing [ ] cooking [ ] reading [ ] doing nothing [ ] arts/crafts [ ] writing [ ] bicycling [ ] bridges [ ] photography [ ] charades [ ] travel [ ] walking [ ] collecting [ ] hugging [ ] chess [ ] touching [ ] roulette [ ] debater [ ] dancing [ ] kissing [ ] running [ ] chatting 9. Do you learn athletics and dancing better by: a. imitating and getting the feel of the music or game? b. learning the sequence and repeating the steps mentally? 10. In sports or performing in public do you often perform better than your training and natural abilities warrant? a. yes b. no 11. Do you express yourself well verbally? a. yes b. no 12. Are you goal oriented? a. yes b. no 13. When do you want to remember directions, a name, or news items, do you: a. visualize the information? b. write notes? c. verbalize it (repeat it to yourself or out loud?) d. associate it with previous information?
113
14. Do you remember faces easily? a. yes b. no 15. In the use of language, do you: a. make up words? b. devise rhymes and incorporate comparison? c. choose exact precise terms? 16. In a communication situation, are you more comfortable being the: a. listener? b. talker?
17. When you are asked to speak without preparation at a meeting. do you? a. make a quick outlines? b. just start talking c. shift the focus to someone else or say as little as possible? d. speak slowly and carefully? 18. In all argument, do you tend to: a. talk until your point is made? b. find an authority to support your point? c. just become withdrawn? d. push chair or table, pound table, talk louder, yell? 19. Can you tell fairly accurately how much time has passed without looking at your watch? a. yes b. no 20. Do you prefer social situations that are: a. planned in advance? b. spontaneous 21. In preparing yourself for a new or difficult task, do you: a. visualize yourself accomplishing effectively? b. recall past successes in similar situations? c. prepare extensive data regarding the task? 22. Do you prefer working? a. alone? b. in a group?
23. When it comes to "bending the rules" or altering company policy, do you feel: a. rules and policy are to be followed? b. progress comes through challenging the structure? c. rules are made to be broken? 24. In school, did you prefer: a. algebra? b. geometry?
114
d. hooked left-handed positions 26. In note taking, do you print? a. never? 27. Do you use gestures to: a. emphasize your point? b. frequently? b. express your feelings?
28. Do you instinctively feel an issue is right or correct, or do you decide on the basis of information? a. feel b. decide 29. I enjoy taking risk a. yes b. no 30. After attending musical: a. I can sing the tune without opening my lips b. I can recall many parts of the lyrics 31. Please hold a ballpen vertically to the ground at arm's length, centered in your line of vision and lined up with a frame, board, or door. Holding that position, close your left eye. did your ball appear to move? a. yes b. no Close your right eye, did your ballpen appear to move b. yes b. no 32. Sit in a relaxed position and clasp your hands comfortably in your lap. Which thumb is on top? a. left
115
b. right c. parallel 33. Check as many of these items as you feel are true about you; [ ] I can extract meaning from contracts, instructions manuals, and legal documents. [ ] I can understand patterns and diagrams [ ] I strongly visualize the characters, setting, plot of reading materials [ ] I prefer that friends phone in advance of their visits [ ] I dislike chatting on the phone [ ] I find it satisfying to plan and arrange the details of a trip [ ] I postpone making telephone calls [ ] I can easily find words in a diagram, names in a phone book [ ] I love puns (use of a word in different senses or of words which differ in meaning but sounds alike) [ ] I take lots of notes at meetings and lectures [ ] I freeze when I need to operate mechanical things under stress [ ] Ideas frequently come to me out of the nowhere 34. I have a. frequent mood changes b. almost no mood changes 35. I am: a. not very conscious if body language, I prefer to listen to what people say b. good at interpreting body language c. good at understanding what people say and also the body language they use
116
9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
SWIMMING 9 GOLF 4 SKIING 7 SINGING 3 PLAYING INSTRUMENT 4 SEWING 3 ARTS/CRAFTS 5 PHOTOGRAPHY 3 TRAVEL 5 COLLECTING 1 CHESS 2 ROULETTE 7 DANCING 7 RUNNING 8 KISSING 9 CHATTING 4 9 1 9 1 1 7 1 9 9 1 3 5 7 1 9 5 1 6 3 3 6 9 4 3 1 7 9 1 9 1 9
TENNIS 4 CAMPING/HIKING 7 FISHING 8 GARDENING 5 HOME IMPROVEMENTS 3 READING 3 COOKING 5 DOING NOTHING 9 BICYCLING 8 WRITING 2 BRIDGE 2 CHARADES 5 WALKING 8 HUGGING 8 TOUCHING 9 DEBATING 2
117
21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33.
1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 9 8 1
5 7 5 9 7 9 8 9 3 1 2 9
1 9 9 3
118
Grade Point 4.00 3.75 3.5 3.25 3 2.75 2.5 2.25 2.0 1.75 1.5 1.25 1.0 0.00
Percenta ge 99-100 97-98 95-96 93-94 91-92 89-90 87-88 85-86 83-84 81-82 79-80 77-78 75-76 74-below
Descripti on Excellent Superior Very Good Good Satisfactor y Fair Passed Failed
119
Appendix J: Summary of Computation of the Chi Square Test 1. Create a table of cell frequencies. 2. Compute row and column totals. 3. Compute expected cell frequencies using the formula:
where Eij is the expected frequency for the cell in the ith row and the jth column, Ti is the total number of subjects in the ith row, Tj is the total number of subjects in the jth column, and N is the total number of subjects in the whole table. 4. Compute chi square computed value using the formula:
where x2 is the chi square computed value, E is the expected value (from no. 3), and O is the observed value. 5. Compute chi square tabulated value with the degrees of freedom () and the formula: v = (R-1)(C-1) where R is the number of rows and C is the number of columns. 6. Use a chi square table to look up the probability value (See Appendix K). 7. Determine whether chi square computed value is greater than chi square tabulated value. 8. Interpret results.
120
df 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
0.10 2.7055 4.6052 6.2514 7.7794 9.2363 10.6446 12.017 13.3616 14.6837 15.9872 17.275 18.5493 19.8119 21.0641 22.3071 23.5418 24.769 25.9894 27.2036 28.412 29.6151 30.8133 32.0069 33.1962 34.3816 35.5632 36.7412 37.9159 39.0875 40.256 41.4217 42.5847 43.7452 44.9032 46.0588 47.2122 48.3634 49.5126 50.6598 51.805 52.9485 54.0902 55.2302 56.3685 57.5053 58.6405
0.005 7.8794 10.5965 12.8381 14.8602 16.7496 18.5475 20.2777 21.9549 23.5893 25.1881 26.7569 28.2997 29.8193 31.3194 32.8015 34.2671 35.7184 37.1564 38.5821 39.9969 41.4009 42.7957 44.1814 45.5584 46.928 48.2898 49.645 50.9936 52.3355 53.6719 55.0025 56.328 57.6483 58.9637 60.2746 61.5811 62.8832 64.1812 65.4753 66.766 68.0526 69.336 70.6157 71.8923 73.166 74.4367
121
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
59.7743 60.9066 62.0375 63.1671 64.2954 65.4224 66.5482 67.6728 68.7962 69.9185 71.0397 72.1598 73.2789 74.397 75.5141 76.6302 77.7454 78.8597 79.973 81.0855 82.1971 83.3079 84.4179 85.527 86.6354 87.7431 88.8499 89.9561 91.0615 92.1662 93.2702 94.3735 95.4762 96.5782 97.6796 98.7803 99.8805 100.98 102.0789 103.1773 104.275 105.3723 106.4689 107.565 108.6606 109.7556 110.8501 111.9442 113.0377 114.1307 115.2232 116.3153 117.4069
75.7039 76.9689 78.2306 79.4898 80.7465 82.0006 83.2525 84.5018 85.7491 86.994 88.2366 89.477 90.7153 91.9518 93.1862 94.4185 95.6492 96.8779 98.1049 99.3303 100.5538 101.7757 102.9961 104.2148 105.4323 106.6473 107.8619 109.0742 110.2854 111.4954 112.7037 113.9107 115.1163 116.3209 117.524 118.7261 119.927 121.1262 122.3244 123.5218 124.7176 125.9123 127.106 128.2987 129.4902 130.6812 131.8705 133.0589 134.2466 135.4327 136.6188 137.803 138.9869
122
100
118.498
140.1697
Appendix L COMPUTATION FOR THE CHI SQUARE VALUES FOR SPECIFIC QUESTION NO. 2 Appendix L.1. Chi Square Computed Value O-E (O-E)2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 x2
computed
0.77 -0.23 -0.54 1.31 -0.19 -1.12 -0.38 0.12 0.27 -1.15 -0.65 1.81 -0.54 0.96 -0.42
0.59 0.05 0.29 1.71 0.04 1.24 0.15 0.01 0.07 1.33 0.43 3.27 0.29 0.92 0.18
(O-E)2 E 0.18 0.23 0.11 0.10 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.65 0.45 0.54 24.04 0.42 27.03
Appendix L.2. Chi Square Tabulated Value v= (r-1) x (c-1) = (3-1) x (5-1) =2x4 =8 =0.05 x2 tab value=15.507
123
Appendix M COMPUTATION FOR THE CHI SQUARE VALUE FOR SPECIFIC QUESTION NO. 3 Appendix M.1. Chi Square Computed Value O-E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 x2
computed
(O-E)2 E 0.395604396 0.038461538 0.423076923 0.114285714 0.1 0.227272727 0.296124927 0.145748988 0.53146853 2.272043743
Appendix M.2. Chi Square Tabulated Value v= (r-1) x (c-1) = (3-1) x (3-1) =2x2 =4 =0.05 x2 tab value=9.488