Fraud Detection Project Report
Fraud Detection Project Report
Additional Key Words and Phrases: Random Forest, Decision Trees, Exploratory data analysis, Fraud detection
1 INTRODUCTION
Insurance fraud is a pervasive problem that has been affecting the insurance industry for many years. One of the most
common types of insurance fraud is vehicle insurance fraud, which involves making false or exaggerated claims for
damages or injuries resulting from a car accident. In recent years, the volume and frequency of vehicle insurance fraud
incidents have increased significantly, leading to significant losses for insurance companies.
The purpose of this project is to create a model using machine learning algorithms to detect vehicle insurance fraud. One
challenge in using machine learning for fraud detection is that fraud is much less common than legitimate insurance
claims, which can make it difficult for the model to accurately identify fraudulent activity. In order to develop a successful
model, it is important to balance the cost of false alerts with the potential savings from avoiding losses due to fraud.
Insurance fraud can take many forms, including arranging accidents, misrepresenting the circumstances of an accident,
and exaggerating the extent of damages or injuries. Machine learning can help improve the accuracy of fraud detection
and allow insurance companies to more effectively identify and prevent fraudulent activity.
2 METHODOLOGY
The first step in our project was to collect a large dataset of past insurance claims, both fraudulent and legitimate. We
obtained this dataset from Kaggle , which provided us with anonymized data on a variety of claims made over a period
of several years. The dataset included information on the type of claim, the amount of the claim, the date of the claim,
and other relevant details.
Once we had collected the dataset, we performed basic data analysis to understand the characteristics of fraudulent
claims. This analysis allowed us to identify key features that are often associated with fraudulent claims, such as the
amount of the claim, the type of claim, and the date of the claim. We also looked at other factors, such as the location of
the accident and the number of people involved, to see if they had any impact on the likelihood of fraud.
With this information in hand, we proceeded to train a machine learning model to detect fraudulent claims. We used a
variety of algorithms, including logistic regression, decision trees, and random forests, to develop the model. We trained
the model on the dataset of past claims, using the identified features as inputs and the known fraudulent and legitimate
labels as outputs.
Once the model was trained, we tested it on a separate dataset of claims to see how well it performed. We found that
the model was able to accurately detect fraudulent claims with a high degree of accuracy, achieving an overall accuracy
rate of over 𝑋𝑋 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡.
• Exploratory Data Analysis: This involves examining the data to understand its characteristics and identify any
patterns or trends.
• Data Preprocessing: This involves cleaning and preparing the data for modeling, such as by handling missing
values, transforming variables, and scaling the data.
• Data Modeling: This involves building and fitting statistical or machine learning models to the data to make
predictions or classify data points.
• Model Evaluation: This involves assessing the performance of the model using metrics such as accuracy,
precision, and recall, and making adjustments to improve the model as needed
Some important plots and pairwise comparisons between our dependent and independent variables.
Analysis: Mercedes and Accura have a higher probability of fraudulent transactions, most likely due to a higher
return in these costlier cars
Analysis: Fraudulent claims are generally made from persons ranging from the age group 30-40
Analysis: Newer Vehicles and Ages of vehicles between 2-4 years have encountered many Fraudulent claims
Fig. 6. FraudFound vs AccidentArea Fig. 7. FraudFound vs PastClaims
4 MODEL EVALUATION
<Model Evaluation and Results>