2000 Esm
2000 Esm
7.43 000000
111111
000000
111111 00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
6.05 11111
00000
00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
6 I 0.51/8928/248 0.54/4464/744
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
II 0.52/8877/269 0.51/3228/538
3.75 11111
00000
000000
111111
00000
11111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111 III 0.50/9216/256 0.53/4572/762
000000
111111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111 11111
00000
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
9 I 0.53/10458/249 0.55/9777/486
2.74
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
3 000000
111111
00000
11111
000000
111111
WTs111111 00000
11111
6 WTs 11111
000000 9 WTs
00000 00000
11111
3 6 WTs 11111
WTs111111
000000
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
00000
11111
9 WTs
00000
11111 II 0.53/10038/239 0.53/13623/518
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111 000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111
00000
11111
000000
111111
000000
111111
00000
11111
00000
11111 000000
111111
000000
111111 00000
11111
00000
11111 III 0.52/10248/244 0.53/12820/494
0.95 0.99
Confidence Level
Table 2: Simulation Results for 3, 6 and 9 WTs
Figure 3: Redu
tion in Time by Applying MRIP with (Conden
e Level of 99% and Relative Error
with Ten Pro
essors for Dierent S
enarios (3 up of 5%)
to 9 Wireless Terminals)
better if one applies it to longer simulations. the initial transient phase of the simulation, i.e.
Although we have used an almost homogeneous the number of observations dis
arded before the
set of pro
essors, the above results
an be to some steady state had begun.
extent ina
urate, as they
an vary with the sys- One
an
lear observe that under MRIP, dis-
tem load of a given Lo
al Area Network (LAN). A tributing simulation on more pro
essors is mu
h
better way of studying this phenomenon would be more eÆ
ient, as one may need fewer observa-
to analyze an average number of observations re- tions for stopping simulation (with the same level
quired for stopping the simulation when it rea
hes of statisti
al error) than in the
ase of fewer pro-
an a
eptable level of statisti
al error.
essors. Dierent (short) lengths of the transient
phases justify the appli
ation of the sequential sta-
WT P=1 P = 10 tionarity tests (su
h as the test implemented in
3 I 0.51/3645/243 0.51/2916/486 AKAROA-2), instead of dis
arding an arbitrary
II 0.52/3705/247 0.51/3108/518 (xed) number of observations. Dis
arding too few
III 0.50/3885/259 0.52/2964/494 initial observations
an lead to statisti
ally biased
6 I 0.51/4464/248 0.54/2976/496 nal results [11℄, while dis
arding too many obser-
II 0.51/4035/269 0.51/1614/269 vations would unne
essarily lengthen the simula-
III 0.50/4608/256 0.51/3072/512 tion.
At the end, let us look at the SMPT results. Fig-
9 I 0.53/2988/249 0.53/4494/749
ure 4 and 5 show the histogram of the jitter of su
-
II 0.53/3585/239 0.54/5736/956
III 0.52/3660/244 0.52/4410/735
essfully transmitted network layer segments as a
fun
tion of the segment length (measured in MAC
Table 1: Simulation Results for 3, 6 and 9 WTs pa
kets). Obviously the SMPT 1 method provides
(Conden
e Level of 95% and Relative Error of better results in the sense of jitter. Future appli
a-
5%) tions will need stable and bounded jitter in
ombi-
nation with low segment losses. The resulted seg-
ment loss probabilities are shown in table 3 and
Table 1 and Table 2 depi
t the results
hara
- re
e
ts the fa
t that with SMPT we
an expe
t
terizing the performan
e of the analyzed wireless performan
e improvements not only the sense of
network in the three s
enarios (with 3, 6 and 9 the jitter but also in the sense of segment losses.
WTs), obtained when using 1 or 10 pro
essors, Therefore we
laim that SMPT is able to support
and assuming 95% and 99%
onden
e levels of future multimedia appli
ations more eÆ
ient than
results, respe
tively. For ea
h wireless terminal in other proposals.
ea
h s
enario, the rst value stands for the jit- The results presented in Figure 4 and 5 were
ter estimate, the se
ond value stands for the sam- obtained with the relative error of 1% (at the
ple size required for a
hieving the relative error of 1 Only three
odes were allowed to be used simultane-
5%, and the third value stands for the length of ously.
0.025
0.016
0.014
0.02
0.012
0.01 0.015
0.02 0.03
Probability
Probability
0.015
0.008 0.02
0.01 25 25
0.01 0.01
0.005 0.006
20 20
s]
s]
et
et
0
ck
0
ck
15
pa
15
pa
0.004 0
0
AC
AC
0.005
[M
[M
2 2 10
h
10
h
gt
gt
en
en
0.002
tl
4
tl
en
en
5 5
m
gm
g
6 6
se
se
jitter jitter 0
0
8 0 8 0
Figure 4: Histogram of the Jitter of Su
essfully Figure 5: Histogram of the Jitter of Su
essfully
Transmitted Network Layer Segments as a Fun
- Transmitted Network Layer Segments as a Fun
-
tion of of the Segment Length with Sequential tion of of the Segment Length with SMPT (Con-
Transmission Method (Conden
e Level 99% Rel- den
e Level 99% Relative Error 1%)
ative Error 1%)
Transmission Segment Loss Mean Jitter these features (the sequential analysis of simula-
Method Probability [MAC pa
kets℄ tion output data and parallelization of simulation
Sequential 18.24% 2.438 programs) have been in
orporated in AKAROA-2.
SMPT 11.41% 0.761 The work on in
reasing fun
tionality of this pa
k-
age is
ontinued both at the Te
hni
al University
Table 3: Losses and Mean Jitter of Segments with of Berlin, Germany, and the University of Canter-
Dierent Transmission Methods for Ten Wireless bury in Christ
hur
h, New Zealand.
Terminals (Conden
e Level 99% Relative Error
1%)
Referen
es
99%
onden
e level). They
an be
ompared with
those depi
ted in Figure 6 and 7, obtained with the [1℄ Bertsekas, D. and Gallager, R.,Data Net-
relative error of 25% (at the 99%
onden
e level). works,Prenti
e Hall,New Jersey,se
ond edi-
One
an see the importan
e of using simulation tion,1992
results with appropriately small statisti
al errors.
As Figure 6 and 7 show, the results with too large [2℄ Proakis, J.G.,Digital Communi
ations,
error may be misleading or, at least, in
on
lusive. M
Graw-Hill International Edition,Third
In this
ontext, one
ould wonder about the
red- Edition,USA
ibility of results from sto
hasti
simulation when
their statisti
al error is not assessed at all. [3℄ Fitzek, F., Rathke, B., S
hlager, M.,
A.Wolisz,Quality of Servi
e Support for
Real-Time Multimedia Aplli
ations over
4 FINAL REMARKS Wireless Links using the Simultaneous
MAC-Pa
ket Transmission (SMPT) in a
Our results show both importan
e of sequential CDMA Environment,Pro
. MoMuC 1998,pp
analysis of simulation output data, as the only ef- 367-378,O
tober,1998
fe
tive way of
ontrolling the statisti
al error of
the nal results, and usefulness of parallel simu- [4℄ Zorzi, M. and Rao, R.R.,Energy
onstrained
lation in MRIP s
enario, as a simple and pra
- error
ontrol for wireless
hannels,IEEE Per-
ti
al way for speeding up of otherwise very long sonal Communi
ations,vol. 4,pp. 27-33,De
.
simulations. Automati
implementation of both 1997
0.045
0.045
0.04
0.04
0.035 0.035
0.03 0.03
0.05 0.05
0.025 0.025
Probability
0.04
Probability
0.04
s]
s]
et
et
0
ck
0
ck
15
pa
15
pa
1 0.01 1 0.01
AC
AC
[M
2
[M
2
10
h
10
h
gt
3
gt
en
en
0.005 0.005
tl
4
tl
en
en
5 5
m
5
m
g
g
se
se
jitter 6 jitter 6 0
0
0 7 0
7
Figure 6: Histogram of the Jitter of Su
essfully Figure 7: Histogram of the Jitter of Su
essfully
Transmitted Network Layer Segments as a Fun
- Transmitted Network Layer Segments as a Fun
-
tion of of the Segment Length with Sequential tion of of the Segment Length with SMPT (Con-
Transmission Method (Conden
e Level 99% Rel- den
e Level 99% Relative Error 25%)
ative Error 25%)
[5℄ Ormondroyd, R.F.,Performan
e of Low-Rate [12℄ Pawlikowski, K., Yau, V. and M
Ni
kle, D.,
Orthogonal Convolutional Codes in DS- Distributed sto
hasti
dis
rete-event simula-
CDMA Appli
ations,IEEE Transa
tions on tion in parallel time streams, Pro
. of the 1994
Vehi
ular Te
hnology,Vol 46,no. 2,May,1997 Winter Simulation Conferen
e, pp. 723{730,
1994.
[6℄ IEEE802.11,"Wireless LAN Medium A
ess
Control (MAC) and Physi
al Layer (PHY) [13℄ S
hmeiser, B., Bat
h size ee
ts in the anal-
Spe
i
ations",IEEE Stds. Dept.,Jan.,1996 ysis of simulation output, Operations Re-
sear
h, Vol.30, no.3, 556{598, May-June 1982.
[7℄ ETSI TC-RES,Radio Equipment and Sys-
tems (RES); High Performan
e Radio Lo
al [14℄ S
hruben, L.W., Dete
ting initialization bias
Area Network (HIPERLAN); Type 1,Fun
- in simulation output, Oper. Res., Vol.30, pp.
tional Spe
i
ation,Fran
e,De
.,1996 569{590, 1982.
[8℄ Heildelberger,P., Statisti
al analysis of paral- [15℄ Lee, J.S.R., Pawlikowski K and M
Ni
kle.
lel simulations, Pro
. 1986 Winter Simulation Sequential steady-state simulation: Rules of
Conferen
e, 290{295, 1986. thumb for improving a
ura
y of the nal
results, Pro
. European Simulation Simpo-
[9℄ Meketon, M.S. and S
hmeiser, B., Overlap- sium, ESS'99, Erlangen, Germany, pp. 618-
ping bat
h means: something for nothing ?, 622, 1999.
Pro
. 1984 Winter Simulation Conferen
e,
227{230, 1984. [16℄ Regents of the University of Cali-
fornia, Berkeley (USA), PTOLEMY,
[10℄ Mota, E., Wolisz, A. and Pawlikowski. K., http://ptolemy.ee
s.berkeley.edu
Sequential bat
h means te
hniques for mean
value analysis in distributed simulation, Pro
. [17℄ Ewing, G., M
Ni
kle, D. and Pawlikowski K.
13th European Simulation Multi
onferen
e AKAROA-2: Exploiting network
omputing
Warsaw, pp. 129{134, 1999. by distributing sto
hasti
simulation, Pro
.
13th European Simulation Multi
onferen
e,
[11℄ Pawlikowski, K., Steady-state simulation of Warsaw, Poland, pp. 175-181, 1999.
queueing pro
esses: a survey of problems and
solutions, ACM Computing Surveys, vol.22,
pp. 123{170, 1990.