0% found this document useful (0 votes)
139 views

Water Treatment Process Using Conventional and Adv

This document compares water treatment processes in Malaysia and selected countries. It discusses conventional and advanced water treatment methods, including the use of Industrial Revolution 4.0 technologies. Water quality indices of rivers in each country are also briefly discussed. Adopting advanced technologies in water treatment could help improve treatment efficiency and monitoring while addressing issues like funding and expertise gaps between countries.

Uploaded by

Eka Saputra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
139 views

Water Treatment Process Using Conventional and Adv

This document compares water treatment processes in Malaysia and selected countries. It discusses conventional and advanced water treatment methods, including the use of Industrial Revolution 4.0 technologies. Water quality indices of rivers in each country are also briefly discussed. Adopting advanced technologies in water treatment could help improve treatment efficiency and monitoring while addressing issues like funding and expertise gaps between countries.

Uploaded by

Eka Saputra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like


- A review: the utilization of mesoporous
Water treatment process using conventional and materials in wastewater treatment
Badria M Al-Shehri, Abd El Rahman S
advanced methods: A comparative study of Khder, Sheikha S Ashour et al.

- Utilisation of drinking water treatment


Malaysia and selected countries sludge for the manufacturing of ceramic
products
O Kizinievi and V Kizinievi
To cite this article: N H Pakharuddin et al 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 880 012017
- Long-term monitoring of water treatment
technology designed for radium
removal—removal efficiencies and NORM
formation
Liie Hill, Siiri Suursoo, Madis Kiisk et al.
View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 181.215.206.85 on 17/11/2021 at 05:59


STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

Water treatment process using conventional and advanced


methods: A comparative study of Malaysia and selected
countries

N H Pakharuddin1*, M N Fazly1, S H Ahmad Sukari1, K Tho1 and W F H


Zamri1,2,*
1
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi,
Selangor, Malaysia
2
Institute of IR 4.0 (IIR4.0), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi,
Selangor, Malaysia

*Corresponding E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract. Water treatment is the process of removing all those substances, whether biological,
chemical, or physical, that are potentially harmful to the water supply for human and domestic
use. This treatment helps to produce water that is safe, palatable, clear, colorless, and odorless.
The basic steps of water treatment include coagulation, precipitation, filtration, and
disinfection. Water treatment before supplying water to consumers is essential to improve
water quality to create a sustainable life. Water treatment can eliminate potential or certain
harmful substances in the water to prevent the consumption of contaminated water sources that
can cause potential health problems. Therefore, it is important to establish a water treatment
facility with sufficient capacity to remove pollutants according to standards before being
supplied to consumers. In this study, the focus of the discussion is on the use of river water as a
source of water for consumers in Japan, Australia, Canada, and Malaysia after a water
treatment process. This paper reviews the recent progresses of water treatment process using
both conventional and advanced methods. A brief discussion on the water quality index of each
country’s rivers is presented. Several potential applications of Industrial Revolution 4.0
technology in the water treatment process are discussed. Adoption of the industrial revolution
of technology in water treatment may provide many benefits to this field and excavate more
potential improvement. This paper will deliver a scientific and technical overview and useful
information to scientists, engineers, and stakeholders who work in this field.

Keywords: Water Treatment; River; Water Quality; Conventional Treatment; IR4.0


Technology

Track Name: Land, Water, Forests and Food Security

1. Introduction
Water scarcity and demand in clean water sources globally has influenced all parts of human existence
which creates the biggest impacts on least developed nations and rural communities. The United

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) aims to ensure the accessibility and management
of water and sanitation for all, including an end to open defecation, by 2030 [1]. It is known that due
to rapid advancement of industrialization will results in destruction of ecosystem and biodiversity loss.
As mentioned by World Health Organization (WHO, 2017), it is expected that undersupply of water
will displace 700 million people by 2030, while desertification will put the livelihood of one billion
people living in 100 countries across the world at risk by 2050 [1]. To fulfil the objectives of the SDG
6, the High-Level Panel on Water has developed innovative approaches to solve global water scarcity
since recent years traditional financing solutions and technologies have proven to be insufficient in
addressing these challenges. Concerns in the water industry were raised by several important issues
that made a setback for modern technology of water treatment process to be applied in the world.
These issues are also connected to the gap research of this study for instance, climate change, capacity
of building infrastructure, lack of funding, improper and insufficient training.
In water treatment process, composition of precipitation in the rivers played a major role to define
whether a treatment process is efficient in producing a good quality of water [2]. Due to changing of
rising sea levels, unpredictable rainfall, saltwater intrusion would likely affect the change of
precipitation patterns [2]. Not to mention, natural disasters such as earthquakes, storms happening in
Japan, forest deforestation in Australia, floods in Malaysia can affect infrastructure of Water
Treatment Plants (WTPs) in large-scale system and small-scale system [3]. Next, lack of funding for
advanced water treatment process became a major barrier among countries. This is because, interests
in technological innovations in water and disinfection remain insufficient [4]. The water innovations
area is yet in its beginning phase of understanding the potential outcomes that 4IR can bring for real-
life applications to help in the creation of smart and genuine organizations, networks, urban areas, and
countries across the globe. Therefore, technologies should be combined and lead by development in
organizations, plans of actions, and proper financing system for this to be a fruitful undertaking.
As mentioned before, lack of expertise between these countries could lead to a stagnant progress for
advancement of water treatment process. In Malaysia, WTPs and wastewater business are in desperate
need of a set up institutional program to train a huge number of staffs [5]. It was understood that the
water industry (especially WTPs) is denied of formal conventional knowledge-based training for two
decades since the privatization of Institut Kerja Raya Malaysia (IKRAM) in 1996 which paused many
training programs in the water sector at central level [5]. Without formal centralized training
institutions like IKRAM, the staffs will be dependent on in-house training which can limit newer
expertise and adaptions towards technology.
Further into this paper, Water Quality Index (WQIs) of every country will be discussed as the
quality of water, is an important aspect of water management system way before the age of 4IR [6].
Contaminations in the water such as pathogens, harmful chemicals can affect the overall properties of
water system [7]. Every country has its own WQIs to ensure clean water consumption to avoid any
acute and chronic health effects. However, sampling and testing of water source used to be done
manually which is time consuming and absence of staffs attending can lead to incorrect data of WQIs.
Hence, modification technological advances will be identified under the aspects of the Fourth
Industrial Revolution (4IR) between Malaysia, Canada, Japan, and Australia.
In this fourth technological wave in industry, cyber physical systems can interact with one another
using artificial intelligence (AI), Big Data, Drones, and the Internet of Things (IoT), etc. The 4IR
mentioned, provide a progressive method of organization, production and distribution based on digital
transformation and authorization that can erase limits between physical object [8]. In hindsight, the
implementation of 4IR in water treatment process can contribute a lot to economic growth,
employment, and sustainable development in governance of a nation. In this paper, the scope chosen
for the source of water in every country is from river. Since 98 % of water came from river in
Malaysia whilst it is 92 % for Canada [9]. In terms of common industry with Malaysia such as
transportation, travel, and fisheries 78 % summed up the water source from river in Australia [10]. On
the other hand, 11 major rivers in Japan have become the nation source of water (88 %) [25].

2
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

2. Water Treatment Process: Conventional vs Non-Conventional


There are two types of water treatment, namely conventional water treatment and unconventional
water treatment. Conventional water treatment uses a combination of physical, chemical, and
biological processes and operations. Preliminary, main, secondary, and tertiary and/or advanced water
treatment are all words that are used to describe various levels of treatment in order of increasing
treatment level. Non-conventional method water treatment is simpler than the conventional method of
water treatment [11-12]. Non-conventional technologies have lower environmental impacts and reduce
contaminant loads at lower costs than conventional treatments. Compared to the conventional method,
the non-conventional method uses more advance equipment and technology [12-13]. The use of
technology depends on the quality of the water source. Non-conventional will be used if and only the
conventional water treatment is no longer feasible due to factors such as extreme water contamination.
Figure 1 below shows the flow of processes that involve in typical conventional water treatment.

Figure 1. The typical conventional water treatment [11-13]

Before water is distributed to an urban community, it is treated to ensure safety and pleasant to drink.
Of the great variety of water treatment processes, those mentioned later are by far the most applied
[11-14]. Steps of water treatment;
a. Coagulation, Flocculation and Sedimentation
While many particles will gradually settle out from water over time, a process called sedimentation,
some will not. To cause slow or non-settling particles to settle out more readily, a soluble chemical or
mixture of chemicals is added to the water. Such chemicals are called coagulants and the process is
called coagulation [11]. Coagulants react with the particles in the water, forming larger particles called
flocs, which settle rapidly and can be removed as sludge [11-12]. Flocs can also be effectively
removed by passing the water through a filter, either directly or after sedimentation. The process is
controlled so that the coagulant chemicals are removed along with the contaminants [11].
b. Filtration
One of the oldest and simplest processes used to treat water is to pass it through a bed of fine particles,
typically sand [12 -13]. Sand filtration will usually remove fine suspended solids and some other
particles such as larger microorganisms. Sand filtration is even more efficient when the water being
treated passes through the sand filter very slowly, although this requires large areas of land, not
normally available in cities [12]. Filtration techniques have changed with the development of modern

3
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

plastics. The result is a new range of filter materials and methods to treat water for urban and
industrial purposes [12].
c. Disinfection
While coagulation, flocculation on and filtration can remove quite a large amount of organic material
and larger microorganisms from raw water, there are some important pathogens that are not eliminated
during these treatments [13]. Disinfection kills harmful microorganisms that may be present in the
water supply and prevents them from regrowing in the distribution systems. Without disinfection,
waterborne diseases become an increased threat. Chlorine is the most widely used disinfectant for
drinking water [12-13]. It is cheap, easy to use, effective at low dose levels against a wide range of
infectious microorganisms and has a long history of safe use around the world [13].
2.1 Water Treatment Process in Malaysia
As previously mentioned, there are two types of WTP. Malaysia used both water treatment methods
although the majority of water treatment plant still used conventional water treatment process for
surface water [14-15]. For instance, water treatment process flow at Sungai Dua Water Treatment
Plant (WTP) in which includes three types of water treatment technologies, mainly Sedimentation,
Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) and Lamella Clarifier [14]. There is a total of 5 treatment plants at
Sungai Dua WTP. The plants consist of 2 sedimentation plants, 1 DAF Plant and 2 Lamella Clarifier
Plants. The processes of water treatment are as Figure 2. In Malaysia, the only non-conventional WTP
used is membrane technology. It is said there are only 3 WTP that use this technology in Malaysia
[15-17]. The first plant with membrane technology in Malaysia using ultra-filtration process started
operation in 2006 in Bukit Panchor, Pulau Pinang and then 2 other plants were built and started
operation early 2008 in Selangor [15].

Figure 2. Water treatment processes of Sungai Dua WTP. [14-15]


In February 2013, the industrial-scale UF membrane drinking water treatment plant that located at
Wakaf Bunut WTP, Kelantan was commissioned [16]. With a typical pore size of 0.02 m,
ultrafiltration (UF) is a good barrier for bacteria and viruses and this method can be applied to the
production of potable water [17]. Figure 3 shows the ultrafiltration method (UF) uses membrane
modules as filtration media relative to conventional sand-using plant. A water treatment that uses
ultrafiltration technology usually goes through simpler phases than conventional ones. Among the
benefits of using UF technology is that it can generate high-quality clean water, lower operating costs,
an easily upgradable system, and a compact system that reduces space.

4
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

Figure 3. Water treatment process using UF Technology. Source: Bakhtiari et al. (2014) [15]

2.2 Water Treatment Process in Canada


In 2016, regional and municipal governments in Canada had owned over 1,200 Water Treatment
Plants (WTP) [18]. With recent years, the number has increased to 4 % as industrial and water
treatment construction projects have been active in Canada to fulfil the United Nations’ Sustainable
Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) [18]. For instance, the North End Sewage Treatment Plant (NEWPCC)
Upgrade Project that is still in the schematic design phase and estimated to be completed in 2028 with
$1.8 billion in total costs [18].
The raw water will flow from rivers in Canada to the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) across the
country. Then, it is pumped to the WTP through the reservoirs and undergoes several steps of
treatment to produce high-quality water. WTPs in Canada has added Ozonation and Ultraviolet (UV)
Light in their water treatment process [18]. Liquid ozone is added to kill bacteria, and sodium
bisulphite is added to remove excess ozone. On the other hand, disinfection of water will be done by
exposing water to the UV light [18].
2.3 Water Treatment Process in Japan
In Japan, advanced water treatment only focused on ozone treatment and biological activated carbon
treatment. For the ozone treatment process, minute bubbles are diffused slowly through the jade-tinted
water by the tube at the bottom of the tank [19]. Ozone is a strong oxidizing agent that has the ability
of disinfection of harmful microorganism. The bubbles will attach at the surface of microorganism and
react with it. Thus, it can eliminate potential health risk without chemical means, so the water does not
have unpleasant odors, nor does it taste of bold or disinfectant. Ozone purification process lasts 20
minutes and fine bubbles increase the efficiency to ensure more ozone dissolve in the water [19]. The
process than entering the second stage of advanced water treatment by flowing the water into a
filtration pond containing different grades of biological activated carbon. Organic matter and
decomposition of microorganism propagated in activated carbon. The microporous carbon supports
microorganisms that break down impurities and other by-products of ozone treatment. Active carbon
is very effective at purifying water but need to replenish once every four years due to the reason bed
gradually loses the ability to absorb organic material [19].
2.4 Water Treatment Process in Australia
In many pieces of Australia, surface water put away in repositories is the fundamental hotspot for civil
water supply, making water supply helpless against dry spells; just a lot more modest offer comes
from groundwater [20]. Non-traditional water sources, for example, seawater desalination, assume an

5
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

expanding job in Australia's water supply, with one desalination plant appointed to supply Perth and
others being implicit Sydney, the Gold Coast, Melbourne, Adelaide, and another is intended to be
worked at Port Augusta [20]. The utilization of recycled water- the non-consumable reuse of treated
wastewater for water system of green spaces, fairways, farming yields or modern uses — is normal
and expanding in Australia [20]. Among the 20 biggest water utilities in Australia, the biggest volume
of reused water provided was by SA Water in Adelaide (25,047 ML or 29.6 % of sewage gathered),
while the most minimal volume of reused water was by ACTEW in Canberra (2,104 ML or 7.4 % of
sewage collected) [20].
WTPs in Australia has adopt Biological Activated Carbon Treatment (BAC) that is the biologically
enhanced active carbon process which many water treatment industries considering using it for their
utilities [21]. GAC (granular activated carbon) has long been used to remove dissolved organics from
drinking water [21].

3. Comparison of Water Treatment Process


Generally, there are two different types of Water Treatment Process (WTP) that are conventional WTP
and non-conventional WTP. The Table 1. will show the comparison of the conventional and non-
conventional WTP between the countries. Coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration are
the most basic and commonly used conventional method in WTP. Hence, all the countries in the Table
1 using these methods in WTP. In Malaysia WTP use pulsatube clarifier and Actiflo’ technology.
Pulsatube clarifier technology is the technology that combining the process of flocculation and
clarification in one area whereas Acttifflo’ technology is the compact water clarification process in
which raw water is flocculated with microsand and polymer in a draft tube reactor [22]. All countries
except Japan use chlorination method to kill microorganisms in the water. Only Canada uses
biological activated carbon as a medium for filtration while Malaysia, Japan and Australia used sand
for filtration in conventional WTP. In Japan, membrane filtration technology is being used in the
sedimentation method [19].
The only non-conventional WTP in Malaysia is membrane technology in the ultrafiltration (UF)
system. Canada adopts ozonation technology and Ultraviolet (UV) light for their non- conventional
WTP [18]. Ozonation is being used to kill bacteria by liquid ozone and Ultraviolet (UV) light are used
during disinfection of water. Japan and Australia use biological activated carbon treatment to clarify
water. To disinfect water, Japan uses ozone treatment process. The minute bubbles slowly disperse
through the jade-tinted water through the tube at the bottom of the tank. This method makes the water
does not have any unpleasant odor of disinfection. The advancement of technology might bring more
aid, especially for Malaysia to counter any water disruption because the majority of water disruption
Malaysia are caused by heavily polluted surface water supply.

Table 1. WTPs in Malaysia, Canada, Japan, and Australia


Country Conventional WTP Non- Conventional WTP
Malaysia Coagulation; Flocculation; Sedimentation; Filtration; Membrane Technology in
Chlorination; Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF); Ultrafiltration (UF) system
Pulsatube Clarifier Actiflo’ Technology
Canada Coagulation and Flocculation; DAF; Filtration; Ozonation Ultraviolet (UV)
Chlorination; Fluorination Light
Japan Sedimentation (Membrane filtration technology); Ozone treatment ;
Sand Filtration Biological activated carbon
treatment
Australia Coagulation; Flocculation; Sedimentation; Filtration Biological activated carbon
Disinfection treatment

6
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

3.1 Concept of Water Quality Index (WQI): WQI in Malaysia


In 1985, a study entitled “Development of Water Quality Criteria and Standards for Malaysia” was
dispensed by the Malaysian government which aimed to develop standards for monitoring river water
quality for domestic water use, fisheries and aquatic breeding, livestock drinking, recreation, and
agricultural use [23]. The National Water Quality Standards (NWQS) are defined by six classes for
river water classification supported the descending order of water quality. Table 2 below shows range
of values of various water quality parameters for various classes of river waters [23].

Table 2. The classification and uses of river water quality in Malaysia. Source : Jabatan Alam Sekitar
(2019) [23].
Class Uses
Class І Conservation of natural environment Water Supply І - Practically notreatment necessary
Fishery І - Very sensitive aquaticspecies
Class ІІA Water Supply ІІ - Conventionaltreatment
Class ІІB Fishery ІІ - Sensitive aquatic speciesRecreational use body contact
Class ІІІ Water Supply - ІІІ Extensive treatment required
Fishery ІІІ - Common of economic value and tolerant species; livestockdrinking
Class IV Irrigation
Class Ⅴ None of the above

The Water Quality Index (WQI) has been practiced for about 30 years. The WQI formula uses six
parameters to see river water quality that is biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen
demand (COD), suspended solids (SS), ammonia-nitrogen (AN), and pH [23]. The WQI formula
developed by Department of Environment Malaysia (DOE) is the idea for water quality assessment
regarding pollution load and river water classification under the National Water Quality Standards
(NWQS) [23].
In 2019, river water quality was assessed based on 8118 samples taken from 1353 manual
monitoring stations covering 672 rivers in Malaysia [23]. Out of 672 rivers monitored, 408 (61 %)
showed clean water quality, 205 (30 %) were slightly polluted and 59 (9 %) were polluted. Tabulated
data in Jabatan Alam Sekitar report shows the average water quality that were monitored at Sungai
Selangor in 11 stations including its parameters [23].
Based on the report From Jabatan Alam Sekitar Malaysia, 4 rivers are sampled for WQIs (Sungai
Klang, Sungai Selangor, Sungai Pahang, Sungai Melaka), covering 64 stations. For Sungai Klang (13
stations) and Sungai Selangor (10 stations) are classified as Class III and Class II whereas Sungai
Pahang (27 stations) and Sungai Melaka (14 stations) are Class II and Class III, respectively [23].

3.2 WQI in Canada


The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Water Quality Index (WQI) has been
established since 2001, and itself act as a valuable tool for water resources management [24]. The
CCME WQI model consists of three measures of variances from selected water quality objectives
(Scope; Frequency; Amplitude). These three objectives will be combined to produce a value between
0 to 100 that represents the overall water quality. The water quality is categorized in five grades
(excellent, good, fair, marginal, poor) [24]. With the scores from WQI, these rivers are classified into
classes that are: Excellent as A; Good as B; Fair as C; Marginal as D; Poor as E. The water quality
data are taken from 30 river sites across the province of Ontario, Canada for 5 years (2002-2008) [24].
Within that period, CCME WQI uses 7 or 10 parameters (ammonia, chloride, nitrate, phosphate,
chromium, nickel, zinc, harness, pH, temperature), to be taken for sampling at these 30 river sites. It is

7
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

apparent from the data tabulated, in terms of station years; almost 65% (93v out of 144) fall in the
same category that ranges from Class A and B [24].

3.3 WQI in Japan


Japan's rivers and lakes have moderately low levels of organic compounds and agricultural chemicals
[25]. This phenomenon occurs only around rivers or streams, not in rural areas. Parameters for Japan
WQI are pH, COD, NO2, NO3, Cl, E. coli, APE, and BPA [25]. In 2008, water samples from
Hokkaido (15 Points), shown pH values ranged from 6.45 to 8.27, indicating alkaline properties due to
the Hokkaido area's position as a reliable supplier of grain and livestock in Japan [25]. As a result, the
rural water quality index is better than the urban water quality index. Furthermore, it was discovered
that certain endocrine disruptors, such as APE and BPA, were present in water samples (Tokyo and
Hokkaido) [25]. Effects of endocrine disruptors on the development and differentiation of humans and
wildlife, especially aquatic wildlife. This suggests that environmental toxins, such as endocrine
disrupting chemicals, should be re-examined as disrupting factors in differentiation and growth [25].

3.4 WQI in Australia


Water Quality Index (WQI) communicates the general water nature of a specific source at a specific
time utilizing a 'solitary worth' in view of chosen water quality factors [26]. The WQI consolidates
nine boundaries including temperature, disintegrated oxygen, pH, phosphate, nitrate, all out broke
down solids, natural oxygen interest (Body) and fecal coliform [26]. The list is determined from Q
worth and weight factor W, where Q demonstrates the degree of water quality comparative with any
single boundary and the weight factor speaks to the general significance of the single boundary to the
general water quality [26]. The generally water quality positioning measures falls under five
classifications which are extremely terrible when WQI is < 25, awful when WQI is 26-50, moderate
when WQI is 51-70, acceptable when WQI is 71-90 and excellent when in the scope of 91-100 [26].
The WQI for the port water quality during both high and low tides were reported as good except for
Port Botany and Eden as stated as following [26]. The average value of WQI for Port Jackson (79.07),
Port Botany (72.79), Port Kembia (76.78), Port Newcast (75.15), Port Yamba (77.67), and Port Eden
(67.42) accordingly in the tabulated data [26].

4. Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) in Water Treatment

4.1 Malaysia: Iot (Internet of Things) and Drones


Air Selangor applied a smart river monitoring system (SRMS) that uses unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs) or drones and low power wide area (LPWA) communication technology [27]. Thus, it also
has an Intelligent Command Centre that provides real-time views of the water supply network using
supervisory control and data acquisition (Scada) systems and remote sensor [27]. According to Mazlan
Abbas, co-founder and CEO of IoT service provider Favoriot Sdn Bhd, installation of IoT sensors
along the river and at intersection of major drains aid the law enforcement agencies to take prompt
action once the sensors discover irregularities [27]. The sensor is connected to a central system that
reflected real-time data in visual form. This sensor can inspect the river water quality and odor. Sensor
may install at a specific are such as middle of riverbanks to monitor the condition of rover water
before entering reservoirs. Such sensors have been installed at Sungai Klang [27]. According to The
Star (2020), the total of RM2 million has been allocated by Selangor state government for 4 units
military-grade high technology (DJI Matrice 300) drones to observe rivers in Selangor and guard
against pollution of water resources in November 2020 [28]. The drones used for monitoring Klang
River Basin, Selangor River and Sungai Langat [28]. Drones can catch image of the water samples and
identify area of pollution including in remote area. Additionally, drones may provide supervision for
illegal suspicious activities at night to prevent individuals pollute the water [28].

4.2. Canada: Iot (Internet of Things); Blockchains; Drones and remote sensing

8
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

A company in Canada called Aridea Solutions is performing a pilot project to help predict harmful
water levels in water treatment facilities [29]. They invent the system called Plug and Sense Platform
and collaborate with telecommunication firm. This system consists of sensor to measure water depth
and chemistry composition elements [29]. The data collected is sent by 4G internet to communicate
directly to Aridea’s Terralytix Portal cloud platform. The project showed how the IoT can work
efficiently and benefit water management while assuring cost reduction and removal of human error in
the workflow when using automation [29].
Lake Winnipeg Foundation (LWF) through an RBC foundation grant launched Lake Winnipeg
DataStream to collect data of water from lake Winnipeg [30]. All the sharing of data is through
blockchains technology [30]. DataStream which leveraging the blockchains technology provides a
higher level of security and transparency for managing data water in Canada. Everyone can check and
know the latest authentic datasets over time. Blockchains technology have make authentication for
LWF who constantly observe and protect the water of lake Winnipeg [30].
Toronto water is using drones to help conduct inspections in areas with difficult accessibility [31].
The fleet of aerial autonomous craft used is more advanced, with several drone units on hand named
DJI Phantom 4, the Inspire 1 Pro, and the Mavic Air [31]. These drones will fly over major Toronto’s
waterway, such as Don River to inspect if there are any pipe blockages. With drones, the city water
division has been able to discover decayed infrastructure [31]. Moreover, submarine drone is also used
in the fleet (DeepTrekker DTG2) to be piloted into Toronto’s larger pipes. This way, the need to hire a
scuba diver can be avoided as inspection of pipe integrity can be made virtually instead [31].

4.3 Japan: Iot (Internet of Things) and Big data


The entire water distribution system in Japan, is control and monitored by online water network
analysis to analyze its distributing pressure [32]. This would provide a real-time monitoring for the
pump discharged pressure, valves openings based on historical setting. The system can prevent any
losses in distributing the water by keeping up to date to piping network if there are any changes occur
[32].
Besides IoT, Japan also is using Big Data for low emission sewage treatment control system [32].
This control system can reduce the release amount of any greenhouse gases by performing online
calculation of a linear model of the water treatment process. Soft-sensor technology is the main
components in this control system [32]. It has two function: to remove chemical oxygen demand and
calculate volume of nitrous oxide gas. Monitoring and operating terminal would receive any
measurement from soft sensor and giving a command based on operational setting through model
prediction control module. The operational setting serves as an output to the distribution system to
modify any changes [32].

4.4 Australia: Iot (Internet of Things) and Big data


Australia uses internet of things artificial intelligence to cut down the electricity usage and its
accompanied cost in the water treatment plants [33]. A company, Melbourne water is trying to co-
ordinates pump movement depending on the amount of treated water required on a given day in water
treatment plant on a custom-developed platform [33]. Python, the platform determines optimal pump
calibrations and sends them directly to the pump system without human intervention during its
operation [33]. This program able to utilize historical data to determine the most energy efficient
combinations of pumps and the associated speeds to run them at, to achieve the necessary flow rate
and applies them in real time [33].
Australia using technology big data to collected and analyze discrete data on water resources in its
country [34]. Australia uses big data to access water river quality by identified nutrient exceedances in
accessed basin area. They used technology to identify and solve the problems of salinity and turbidity
which was a major water quality issue for assessed basins in Australia [34]. Australia able to
differentiate the significant gaps in water quality monitoring preclude a comprehensive assessment of
all of Australia’s river systems. Through big data technology, Australia able to collate and interpreted

9
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

data for about 14,000 reaches across the more intensively used catchments. They examine the aquatic
biota index using macro-invertebrates and a river environment index to acquire a balanced river
ecosystem and usage of clean river water to other sectors [34].

5. Malaysia: Towards 4.0 IR Technology in Water Treatment


The summary of Fourth Industrial Revolution (4 IR) in Water Treatment can be shown in Table 3. As
mentioned earlier that in Malaysia, water technology is still in its early stages and support. Aid from
the government and NGOs would really start all possibilities towards technological innovations.
Firstly, by providing courses related to Smart Water Technology in tertiary education to increase labor
skills at the plants. Next, business related to water technology need to practice in creating strong
ecosystem. This is because lack of supportive working environment can discourage adoption of new
technology. In addition, key to the success of a project is getting a strong leadership from the
beginning. Transformation leaders who involve primarily in every strategic planning and progress can
ensure continuous supports from managements and staffs.

Table 3. Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) in Water Treatment.


Country 4.0 IR Technology
Block IoT Drones VR Big
chain Data
Malaysia ✔ ✔
Canada ✔ ✔ ✔
Japan ✔ ✔
Australia ✔ ✔

6. Conclusion
Every country has its own water method for advanced treatment but with same conventional treatment.
Adoption of industrial revolution of technology in water treatment may provide many benefits to this
field and excavate more potential improvement using cutting edge technology. Malaysia though has
poorer water quality index due to limited on budget to kick start the major improvement projects
compared to other three countries; which had successful using and showed improvement on water
quality delivered. Malaysia has big potential to successfully implemented the technology in water
treatment plant because they had set about to research and development in improving water treatment
method by not limited to government’s effort also by private company. In the nutshell, alternative
ways that may bring Malaysia to the path taken by Canada, Japan and Australia are providing a strong
ecosystem to support technology, promoting Smart Water Technology courses in tertiary education,
and implementing strong leadership in management and administration.
References
[1] Division, S. 2020. Use of 4IR Technologies in Water and Sanitation in Latin America and the Caribbean Use of 4IR
Technologies in Water and Sanitation in Latin America and the Caribbean (April).
[2] Akademi Sains Malaysia. 2013. Study on the Current Issues and Needs for Water Supply and Wastewater Management in
Malaysia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, hlm. 53.
[3] Treacy J 2019. Drinking Water Treatment and Challenges in Developing Countries. The Relevance of Hygiene to Health
in Developing Countries
[4] Results for Development Institute 2017 Challenge Funds and Innovation in the Water Sector: A Report to The High-Level
Panel on Water, at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/153732._HLPW_Final_Report_pdf_3.pdf
10
[5] Gofar N and Kassim A 2008. Mechanics of Rainfall Infiltration through Soil Slope.
[6] Kamaludin K H and Ismail W 2017 Water quality monitoring with internet of things (IoT) IEEE Conference on Systems,
Process and Control (ICSPC).

10
STACLIM 2021 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 880 (2021) 012017 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017

[7] Treacy J 2019 Drinking Water Treatment and Challenges in Developing Countries. The Relevance of Hygiene to Health
in Developing Countries
[8] Rüßmann M, Lorenz M, Gerbert P, Waldner M, Justus J, Engel P and Harnisch M 2015 Industry 4.0: The Future of
Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries Boston Consulting Group Boston, MA, USA pp. 1–14.
[9] Canada E and C C 2020 Water Quantity in Canadian Rivers. Retrieved from www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-
change/services/environmental- indicators/water-quantity-canadian- rivers.html
[10] Jahan S and Strezov V 2017 Water quality assessment of Australian ports using water.
[11] World Health Organisation (WHO) 1996 Coagulation, Flocculation and Clarification Fact Sheet 2.13. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/emergencies/fs2_13.pdf
[12]World Health Organisation (WHO) 1996 Filration Fact Sheet 2.13. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/emergencies/fs2_13.pdf
[13] World Health Organisation (WHO) 2007 Water Treatment Session Objectives. Seminar Water Treatment.
[14] Thrumakunasagran V and Vadivelu V M 2014 Sungai Dua Water Treatment Plant. Network On Water Technology in
Asia and Pacific 1–13.
[15] Bakhtiari A R et al 2014 Environment Asia 7 (1) 104–111
[16] Chew C M et al 2015 Malaysia’s largest riverbank filtration and ultrafiltration systems for municipal drinking water
production. Water Practice and Technology 10 (1) 59–65.
[17] Chew C M et al 2015 Practical performance analysis of an industrial-scale ultrafiltration membrane water treatment
plant Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 46 132–139.
[18] City of Winnipeg 2009 Water and waste department. Retrieved from
https://winnipeg.ca/waterandwaste/water/treatment/plant.stm
[19] Tadokoro H et al 2011. Smart water management and usage systems for society and environment. Hitachi Review 60 (3)
164–171.
[20] Report, F. 2012. Top-down efficiency review of SA Water (September).
[21] Rattier M, Reungoat J and Gernjak W 2012 Organic Micropollutant Removal by Biological Activated Carbon Filtration:
A Review Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 53. Urban Water Security Research Alliance
Technical Report (53) 45
[22] Nadya A et al 2015 Design and Development of New Debris Strainer in Water Treatment Plant. Procedia Computer
Science 76 (Iris) 209–216
[23] Sekitar J A 2019 Laporan Kualiti Alam Sekeliling. Jabatan Alam Sekitar.
[24] Lumb A et al 2011 A Comparative Study of USA and Canadian Water Quality Index Models. Water Quality, Exposure
and Health 3 (3–4) 203–216
[25] Kido M et al 2009. Comparison of general water quality of rivers in Indonesia and Japan. Environmental Monitoring
and Assessment 156 (1–4) 317–329
[26] Jahan S and Strezov V 2017 Water quality assessment of Australian ports using water quality evaluation indices PLoS
ONE 12 (12) 1–15
[27] New Straits Times 2020 The rise of digitalization in the water industry Retrieved 15 May 2021, from
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/12/650707/rise-digitalisation-water-industry
[28] The Star 2020 RM2 million drones to be used to catch polluters. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/202
0/10/20/rm2mil-drones-to-be-used-to-catch- polluters
[29] Libelium 2019 Smart water technology provides safe and clean water to indigenous communities in Canada. Retrieved
from https://white-set4.rssing.com/chan-3948965/all_p41.html
[30] A Ross 2019 Ow technology id helping solve big water issues in Canada. Retrieved from
https://discover.rbcroyalbank.com/how-technology-is-helping-solve-big-water-issues-in-canada/
[31] Jackson B 2018 Drones, digital twins, and connected sensors grids: How Toronto Water keeps the pipes flowing today
and in the future. Retrieved from https://www.itbusiness.ca/news/drones-digital-twins-and-connected-sensor-grids-how-
toronto-water-keeps-the-pipes-flowing-today-and-in-the-future/107604
[32] Tadokoro H et al 2011 Smart water management and usage systems for society and environment. Hitachi Review 60 (3)
164–171
[33] ITU News. 2018. How innovative technologies are transforming water management 2018. Retrieved from
https://news.itu.int/innovative- technologies-transforming-water- management/
[34] Ghernaout et al 2018 Applying big data in water treatment industry: A new era of advance. International Journal of
Advanced and Applied Sciences 5 (3) 89–97

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Geran Universiti Penyelidikan: GUP-2018-149, GP-2020-
K016102, and GP-2019-K016102 for funding this work.

11

You might also like