Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT

ISSN: 2792 – 1883 | Volume 2 No. 11

The Issue of Naming [Sffws], their Hierarchical Gradation, Characteristics,

Pulatshoh Ramazonovich Bobokalonov

Abstract: Not only Uzbek, Kyrgyz and Russian linguistics, but also all world linguistics have
approached this problem in one way or another, tried to solve this problem in one or another
attempt. Later, [SFFWS] were clarified from the point of view of systematic linguistics by H.
Ne'matov, R. Saifullaeva.
Keywords: simple sentence, syntax analysis, linguistic symbol, grammatically formed sentences,
morphological additions.

Introduction
Naturally, there is still much debate about these terms: it is somewhat more concise to call them
"semantic-functional sentences" than "semantic-functionally formed utterances". Or it is more
convenient to call them "functional sentences" as opposed to "grammatical sentences". However,
since the essence and purpose of the issue is clarification, the term SFFWS was chosen
[Bobokalonov, 2000]. With this, grammatically, it is considered convenient to easily systematize
the sentences formed from the composition like "Falakning dastidan dod, Unisiga ha, Bunisiga
yo’q". After all, grouping such as "soft word- sentences, word-sentenced words, word- speaking
words, word- sentence type words" shows that it is a colloquialism according to its function. The
speech possibilities and hierarchical ranking of such words are not limited. These words occupy a
completely different position when they move to the auxiliary words or are transposed to another
word group. Similar Ha. Yo’q. (Yes. No.) words can also be seen in the form of participles in the
transposition method: sentences like "Unisiga ha deydi, bunisiga yo‘q deydi”dan «Bunisiga ha,
bunisiga yo‘q. (He says yes to one, no to this one», «Yes to this one, no to that one)» have been
transposed, and their function of yes and no has changed. Therefore, such words can fulfill the
lexical category in the lexicon, and the syntactic category in the syntax. This conversion of words
is found not only in Uzbek, but also in Kazakh, Kyrgyz and other Turkic languages, and even in
Romano-Germanic languages.
II. Literature review
In the Uzbek language, the properties of pure words, spoken words, spoken words, and word-like
phenomena in the lexical system are completely different from the characteristics of grammatically
formed sentences. In this respect, the word is taken at the syntactic level as [SFFWS]. The
manifestation of [SFFWS] in the syntactic environment in the form of pure speech, spoken word,
speaking word, word-like style is based on the expansion of the composition of lexical units. It is
noted that such sentences are hierarchically ranked from "pure" to "-simon" and form a complex of
lexical units as a result of periodic changes.

ISSN 2792-1883 (online), Published in Vol: 2 No: 11 for the month of Nov-2022
Copyright (c) 2022 Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons 114
Attribution License (CC BY).To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
 Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT
ISSN: 2792 – 1883 | Volume 2 No. 11
https://literature.academicjournal.io

The ability of the lexical units of [SFFWS] to become speech has the character of growth and
constitutes a high speech "amplitude"1. On the contrary, independent word groups lack this ability
and cannot be a sentence without a morphological indicator.
III. Analysis
An example of the gradionomic dynamics (grading) of the affirmative meaning of affirmative-
negative lexemes in [SFFWS]s:
1. Ha (Yes) - purely affirmative-word,
2. Mayli (OK) - affirmative-word,
3. To’g’ri (True) - confirming-word,
4. Xuddi shunday. Juda soz. (Similarly). A very positive word.
Now examples of negative sentences: 1) Yo’q. (No) - pure negative, 2) Aslo. Aksincha.
(Absolutely) On the contrary - negated, 3) Tamom. (Complete) - negating, 4) Shartmas.
(Unconditional) - negative.
Grading of historical development based on dialectical law is universal. This natural state is
characteristic of social events, and accordingly, the gradation of the speech phenomenon is shown
in the form of "pure, -lashgan, - lashayotgan, - simon".2 Stated differently, the child's rise from the
womb to the human level in biology is characterized by dialectical law and the principle of
hierarchical gradation. Therefore, the differences between verbal and emotional speech cannot be
defined by strict standards. Because emotional words are purely rhetorical. For example, the
mathematician Al-Khwarazmi has a wonderful hierarchical equation: "If a person has a good
character, it is equal to 1. If a person has beauty, add zero to one = 10. If a person is rich, add
another zero = 100. Add another zero = 1000 if it's a descendant. If the number 1, that is, the
character, disappears, the value of a person will disappear and only zeros will remain = 000. The
conclusion is that a person can rise to the high-amplitude hierarchical level of "behaved, well-
behaved, well-bred and rich" and sink to the lower-amplitude hierarchical level due to bad
behavior.
[SFFWS] also oscillates like the amplitude of a pendulum with a simple expression. This can be
called "speech vibration". In these aspects, [SFFWS] are structurally different from the study taken
as E. Shodmonov's "Words" [Shodmonov, 1970]. In fact, the lexical-syntactic category taken as
utterances includes modals, exclamations and affirmative-negative units, which are considered as
utterances in formal grammar, and lexical-syntactic units, which are usually called introductory
words.
[SFFWS] cannot be learned by equating words. [SFFWS] are distinguished from independent
words (noun, adjective, number, adverb, pronoun) by their composition, boundary, their integral
lexical-syntactic signs, belonging to a separate lexical group. Unlike a typical sentence, the
inflectional indicators characteristic of [Pm] are unusually hidden in the semantic structure of the
lexical unit in [SFFWS]. Of course, 1) typical - "partly morphologically formed sentences" and 2)
atypical - "partially morphologically unformed sentences" put into dichotomous conflict, analysis
1
See: Amplitude (lat. amplitude - size, amount) - the largest deviation of a quantity that oscillates according to a
certain law from the zero value. For example, the deviation of the pendulum from the equilibrium position, the
deviation of the values of current and voltage in alternating current, etc. In other words, Amplitude represents the
amplitude of the vibration. The oscillating quantity reaches its maximum value once during the half-period of the
oscillation. In harmonic oscillations, the amplitude does not change: it always has the same value.
2
Bobokalonov R. Sentence syntax and system-structural interpretation of sentences in Uzbek: monograph. - T.: Science,
2006, p. 3-127.
ISSN 2792-1883 (online), Published in Vol: 2 No: 11 for the month of Nov-2022
Copyright (c) 2022 Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons 115
Attribution License (CC BY).To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
 Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT
ISSN: 2792 – 1883 | Volume 2 No. 11
https://literature.academicjournal.io

and evaluation of the conducted research helps to prove the necessity of comparative study of
[SFFWS] and [KMNH] .
It is worth noting that [GFS] cannot be formed unless independent word groups are accompanied
by cross-references. For example, kel+di, kel+a+di, kel+moqchi like. Auxiliary word groups are
tools that serve to perform a syntactic task. They cannot perform an independent task. However,
[SFFWS] has the ability to be a sentence even without such morphological indicators of participle.
For example, "Balki bugun yomg’ir yog’ar (Perhaps it will rain today)" can be found in another
case in the composition of the speech derivative: / - Bugun yomg’ir yog’ar (It will rain today?) –
Ehtimol (Perhaps)./ For example, there is a difference in the syntactic device such as "Albatta
kelaman (Of course I will come)" and "Albatta kelaman (Of course I will come)".
One is in the structure of the sentence, the other is in a separate syntactic circle: Ertaga kelasizmi?
–Albatta./ in «Albatta, kelaman»/; Albatta /–[Will you come tomorrow? - Of course./ "Of course, I
will come"/ in Of course] - separate [SFFWS], I will come - second sentence. In this case, the
modal word is separated by a comma in written speech, and a pause is important in oral speech.
Because if the speech phenomenon is limited by punctuation marks only in written speech, the
range of live speech is limited by the speaker himself with a pause, one of the dimensions of
thought (Mahmudov, 1995). In this circle, albatta (of course), it is a word-sentences. In "Falonchi,
albatta, keladi (So-and-so will definitely come)" it is not correct to put a comma before and after
definitely. "Falon joyga borasanmi? (Are you going to such and such a place?)" "Albatta boraman
(Of course I will)" (without a comma or pause) means that there is no verb here, only modality is
strengthened. On the contrary, if it were "Albatta, boraman (Sure, I'll go)", then a phonostylistic
phenomenon - a pause or a big pause - a comma or a period can be placed between two
independent components. Speech derivatives such as «Qadamlariga hasanot», «Xush kelibsiz»
belong to the category of colloquialisms [Bobokalonov, 2000]. The fact that [SFFWS] complicate
the sentence within GFS and are in the "subordinate and subordinating" position also requires a
separate study.3
IV. Discussion
In Uzbek linguistics [SFFWS], lexical style and syntactic style are equated. [SFFWS] are such
words that appear only as the center of a sentence, as a participle, that is, unlike ordinary
independent words, they can appear as a speech layer in the lexicon and syntax. Therefore, these
unusual phenomena are considered as "intermediate third" in lexicon and syntax - collision of
lexical-semantic and syntactic phenomena. This is the factor that unites [SFFWS] into one group,
which makes it possible to distinguish the syntactic device they form as a separate acquisition.
Issues such as [SFFWS] complicating the sentence in which it is a part of a simple sentence, their
independent and independent use, and their relationship with the structure of a compound sentence
have not been researched.
There are also some objections in the lexical-semantic level of [SFFWS] word-like contexts and
representations. For example, «Qadamlariga hasanot», «Xush kelibsiz» "indivisible" wholes made
up of phrases such as [SFFWS]?
It is known that lexical level units are divided into two large groups: independent words and
auxiliary words. The conflict between them is "spiritual and functional independence". According
to this sign of contrast, the auxiliary word takes the position of the marked member, and the
independent word takes the position of the unmarked member. An auxiliary word can never be
used independently, they are a participative element in dependent and dependent clauses. An

3
Nematov H., Bobokalonov R. Raupova L. Independent participle form in Uzbek // O'TA, 2000, issue 2, pp. 19-25.
ISSN 2792-1883 (online), Published in Vol: 2 No: 11 for the month of Nov-2022
Copyright (c) 2022 Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons 116
Attribution License (CC BY).To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT
ISSN: 2792 – 1883 | Volume 2 No. 11
https://literature.academicjournal.io

independent word has the ability to be used independently and express meaning. However,
independent words appear in the center of the sentence instead of participle [Pm] - morphological
indicators of participle.
V. Conclusion
A special feature of [SFFWS] depends on their place in the syntactic environment. At the lexical
level of modal words, semantic independence and non-independence are found. For example, 1) in
the composition of heterogeneous meanings from suspicion to certainty: Albatta (Of course) -
completely independent, certainty; Qaydam, ehtimol (Note, Probably) - incorrect independent,
suspect; Words like Shekilli have subordinate, independent, ambiguous meanings. But 2) Yes
within affirmative and negative groups. Ha. Xo‘p, Xo‘sh. Bo‘pti. Mayli. Yo‘q. Aslo. 3) Suggestion
and exclamation: Ma. Mang. Qani. Po‘sht ! Kisht ! Marsh; 4) Encouragement and excitement: A.
A-ha. Bay-bay. Urra. Olg‘a. Yo xudoyo tavba! etc. are completely independent.
Subordinate-independent words are rare in this group. In the semantic classification of all
conflicting lexemes in [SFFWS], the first stage sign is not "spiritual independence", but "spiritual
independence" - the neutrality of the independent lexeme with respect to this sign. So, in the word
independent, "the sign of spiritual independence is conditional [Saifullaeva, 2020].
References:
1. Mengliev B. Structural syntax of the Uzbek language. – Versus: Nasaf, 2003.
2. Nematov H., Rasulov R. Basics of system lexicology of the Uzbek language/Guide for higher
educational institutions. -T.: Teacher, 1995, pp. 15-128.
3. Sayfullaeva R.R. Phrases in modern Uzbek language. - T.: UzMU, 2000. -88 p.
4. Ramazonovich B. P. SYSTEMATIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE LANGUAGE SYSTEM
AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF FERDINAND DE SAUSSURE'S TEACHINGS //Web of
Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 1. – pp. 115-120.
5. Karimova D.H. Variability and invariability in Fairy tales (as the exsample of the translation of
Grimms Fairy Tales). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. ISSN: 1475-7192.
Volume 27 January 2020. P. 138-144
6. Bobokalonov R. R., Bobokalonov P. R. TEXT LINGUISTICS AND THE PROBLEM OF THE
SYNTAX //Scientific reports of Bukhara State University. – 2021. – Т. 5. – №. 56. – pp. 21-33.
7. Bobokalonov R. R., Bobokalonov P. R., Khayatova N. I. MEANINGS OF CANONICAL
WORDSSENTENCES IN THE SPIRIT OF TOLERANCE //International scientific journal. –
2016. – p. 44.
8. Кароматова, З. Ф. (2017). Работа со словарем-эффективный способ изучения английского
языка. Достижения науки и образования, (4 (17)), 81-82.
9. Barotovna, B. M. (2022). Main Features of Choosing Authentic Materials in Foreign Language
Classess. Miasto Przyszłości, 28, 122-124.
http://miastoprzyszlosci.com.pl/index.php/mp/article/view/584
10. Bahodirovna, A. M. “Semantic Field and Sema in Uzbek (In the Example of „Ma‟naviyat‟)”.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION, vol.
1, no. 4, Oct. 2022, pp. 77-80, https://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJISE/article/view/173

ISSN 2792-1883 (online), Published in Vol: 2 No: 11 for the month of Nov-2022
Copyright (c) 2022 Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons 117
Attribution License (CC BY).To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/