Scribd
Upload
67 views

Activity Guide and Assessment Rubric - Task 4 - Appropriation and Leadership in Geopolitics and Environment

El desarrollo de la fase 3, nos permite enfocarnos en el tema de la rotación de auxiliares de enfermería en el servicio de urgencias del hospital comuneros, donde podemos identificar variables y tipos de naturalezas a través de los objetivos y la pregunta planteada en la actividad, se busca saber por qué la rotación de empleados causa, recargas laborales para los demás auxiliares

Uploaded by

Mayra Alejandra Quintero Valencia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
67 views

Activity Guide and Assessment Rubric - Task 4 - Appropriation and Leadership in Geopolitics and Environment

El desarrollo de la fase 3, nos permite enfocarnos en el tema de la rotación de auxiliares de enfermería en el servicio de urgencias del hospital comuneros, donde podemos identificar variables y tipos de naturalezas a través de los objetivos y la pregunta planteada en la actividad, se busca saber por qué la rotación de empleados causa, recargas laborales para los demás auxiliares

Uploaded by

Mayra Alejandra Quintero Valencia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Course: Geopolitics and Environment
Code: 151021

Activity Guide and Assessment Rubric - Task 4 - Appropriation and


Leadership in Geopolitics and Environment

1. Activity Description
Type of Activity: Individual
Evaluation Moment: Final
Highest Activity Score: 125 points
The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on:
November 28, 2022 Sunday, December 11,
2022
With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:

Leads inter-sectoral processes for the prevention and promotion of


health in problematic environments generated by geopolitical decisions
that affect the environment.

The activity consists of:

Individual activity:

Prepare an argumentative essay in which the relationship between


Globalization and the Environment is described from a critical and
reflective position, defining the foundations of the relationship between
the two concepts, their effects and impacts on human health, on the
ecosystem and the possible solutions to the negative effects of
globalization on the planet.

Make the respective citation and reference of the bibliographic sources


consulted to argue the content of the essay, which must be at least five
(5) different sources, such as scientific articles, theses, books, and
documents with academic and scientific support.

1
Participation in the forum
This item includes two components:

-Define the concept of circular economy, its benefits and an example of


your closest environment where this model of production and
consumption is applied. In this item, the student can propose a model
that is their own authorship and inventiveness.

- Socialize the essay in the forum. This element consists of commenting


on the essay made by a classmate, who must identify himself with the
name and make a contribution that offers depth and critical analysis
regarding the work done by him. Suggest new arguments or validate the
exposed ones, with new documentary sources to support the enrichment
of the exposed narrative. Likewise, it can suggest improvement in the
methodological and narrative aspects in which the essay is presented.

The essay will have a minimum length of two (2) pages, a maximum of
three (3) and with the following structure:

1. Title: it is made up of a sentence or brief text that describes the topic


that is going to be developed.
It must be a phrase that arouses the interest of the reader and
introduces him in a general way to the subject.

2. Introduction: In this item, relevant aspects of the topic to be


discussed are synthetically exposed. Its content must be clear, coherent
and attractive to keep the reader's attention and show interest in
continuing to read the writing. The introduction can end with a
question, which will be answered throughout the essay.

3.Knot or Body: Of the parts of the essay, this is the most important
because it is not only the greatest extension in terms of content, but
also, it is where all the reasons or explanations are exposed to answer
the questions of the introduction.
In this part of the essay, all the ideas that support or "argue" what was
raised in the central thesis are integrated. It can also contain the
discussion with one or more authors who have already addressed the
topic and against whom there is an alternative interpretation of it.
Within the node or body, all the data, concepts and/or references that
give greater support and argumentation to the exposed content must
2
be included.

4. Conclusions: In this item, a synthesis of what has been exposed is


made, the findings are described and an answer is given to the question
or approach raised at the beginning of the introduction.

5.Bibliography: In this space, all the sources consulted and that have
been referenced throughout the document are recorded, as well as the
paraphrasing. The bibliography is registered according to the APA
standard at the end of the document and in alphabetical order.

Individual Work Evidences:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

- Document in Word and pdf format with cover, content of the essay
with the requested structure and bibliography, in accordance with the
APA standard.
- Evidence of participation in the activity forum, responding to the
requested concepts, socializing the essay and feedback on the work of
one (1) colleague.
- Upload the essay individually to the tracking environment and
evaluation.

3
2. General Guidelines for the preparation of the learning
evidence to be delivered.

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

- Document in Word format with cover, content of the essay with the
requested structure and bibliography, in accordance with the APA
standard.
- Evidence of participation in the activity forum, responding to the
requested concepts, socializing the essay and feedback on the work of
one (1) colleague.
- Upload the essay individually to the tracking environment and
evaluation.
_________________________________________________________
Evidence of group work:

This activity does not require group evidence.

_________________________________________________________

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products


must comply with the spelling rules and presentation conditions definedin
this activity guide.

Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this


activity must comply with APA Format.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the
academic order, among others, are the following: paragraph e)
"Plagiarism is to present as your own work all or part of a written
report, task or document of invention carried out by another person. It
also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it includes
citations where there is no match between these and the reference"
and paragraph f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational
resources or results of research products, which have rights reserved
for the University ". (Acuerdo 029 - 13 de diciembre de 2013, Artículo
99)

4
The academic penalties students will face are:
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or
evaluation, the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any
disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures
being derived.

5
Type of Activity: Individual
Evaluation Moment: Final
Highest Activity Score: 125 points
First Evaluation High Level: The student participates in the forum in
Criterion: a timely manner, carrying out the two proposed
activities with clarity, coherence and depth.
Participation in the forum

If your work is at this level, you can get between 16


points and 30 points
Average Level: The student participates in the forum
This criterion represents
in a timely manner partially carrying out the proposed
30 points of the total of
activities. There is a lack of greater depth and analysis
125 points of the activity.
in the exposed contents and the feedback of the
partner's essay.

If your work is at this level, you can get between


1 point and 15 points

Low level: The student did not participate in the forum,


his contributions were not relevant or consistent with
what was requested in the guide.

If your work is at this level, you can get 0 points

High Level: The Essay complies with the requested


Second Evaluation
structure and approach. The writing is coherent and
Criterion:
well argued in relation to the exposed topic. Make the
citation of the sources consulted.
Presentation and content of
the argumentative essay.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 41
points and 80 points
This criterion represents
Average Level: The Essay contains the proposed
80 points of the total of approach and does not contain the requested structure.
125 points of the activity There is a lack of greater coherence and depth in the
argumentation of the text and it does not correctly cite
the sources consulted

6
If your work is at this level, you can get between1
point and 40 points

Low level: The analysis does not comply with the


requested aspects; it is not presented in the appropriate
format or the student does not present analysis.

If your work is at this level, you can get 0 points.


Third Evaluation
High Level: The handling of references and
Criterion:
Grammatical Norms is satisfactory. The APA referencing
standards are used.
Presentation of the document,
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9
writing, spelling and citation
points and 15 points
in APA standards
Average Level: Bibliographic references are presented
This criterion represents
but APA standards are not used. The grammatical Norms
15 points of the total of is satisfactory.
125 points of the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
point and 8 points

Low level: Bibliographical sources are not referenced.


The grammatical norms are not satisfactory

If your work is at this level, you can get 0 points.

You might also like