Monitoring Committee
Monitoring Committee
by
J. Madegowda, Ph.D.,
Dean (Acad),
Akshara Institute of Management Studies,
Shivamogga
E-mail: [email protected]
Assessment and Accreditation
• Assessment and Accreditation is a necessity at least for 3 reasons
(1) When an external agency examines our performance, we
understand where we stand – SWOT/C analysis.
(2) Financial assistance from the governments is linked to the
institutional ranking.
(3) Eligibility of your students and teachers to apply for
scholarships, fellowships, projects, etc., depend upon
whether your institution is accredited or not.
• Now the MHRD of GOI is planning to recognise more
assessment and accreditation agencies, in addition to NAAC, to
take up and complete the accreditation of large number of
institutions.
Documentation – why?
• Documentation provides the verifiable evidence
• It is an objective verifiable evidence
• For each entry in the report, there shall be supporting
documents – anybody can verify
• It carries weight for your claim
• External agencies including NAAC/Peer Team validates
your claim based on the evidences shown/presented
• Remember, a few institutions fail to get higher ranking
for not presenting their performance in a convincible
manner
What the Institutions are required to do?
• Each institution is required to establish a separate
Documentation Centre
• Alternatively, the work of the Documentation Centre may be
assigned to IQAC
• IQAC/Documentation Centre should be equipped with
necessary staff and infrastructure – under the supervision of
a senior faculty member; and with a fully automated office
• All information and documents should be made available in
this office and it should be readily available when required
Diverse Information and Documents
• NAAC, in its methodology, has specified the information
required and also the documents in support of the information
or claims made in the report
• It has also specified the format in which to present the
information and documents to be uploaded and/or enclosed
• Therefore, I am not going to present the formats but only the
information required to prepare all these tables and statements
• Of course, most of the institutions possess the requisite details
but only thing is, they should arranged systematically
• Let me identify the criterion-wise information and documents
required to be maintained by the institutions - colleges
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100)
• Number and names of academic and research programmes offered by the Institution:
(1) UG Programmes:
B.A (with number of combination of Specialization Streams) with the year in
which introduced
B.Com with the year in which introduced
B.Sc (with number of combination of specializations) and with the year in
which introduced
New courses/optional introduced and the year of introduction
Others
(2) P.G Programmes with the year in which introduced
(3) Research Programme – Ph.D with the year in which introduced
• Records required:
(1) CDC notification (i.e., renewal of affiliation), and/or
(2) University notification in the form of permission
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (conts)
• Names of permanent teachers who served/serving as the members/chairpersons
academic bodies of affiliating university, other autonomous colleges and other
institutions such as,
Board of Studies,
Faculty,
Academic Council,
Syndicate,
Finance Committee,
Board of Examiners,
Board of Appointments, etc
• Period of membership
Records: Appointment/nomination letters from the university/institution concerned
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (conts)
• Academic programmes offered under CBCS”
UG Programmes
B.A
B.Com
B.Sc, etc
PG Programmes
• The year in which switched over from Semester to CBCS - Programme-wise
• Whether options are given under CBCS for the students to select the courses they wish to
study?
• If so, in what academic programmes?
• Are you offering Elective/Inter-disciplinary courses?
• If so, what are those courses
Records: Notification from the university/college to introduce the above
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (conts)
• Are you offering Certificate Courses and/or Diplomas?
• If yes, what are those courses/Diplomas?
• How many students enrolled for these courses – year-wise
statistics
• Have you discontinued any of these courses/Diplomas?
• If yes, what were reasons?
Records:
(1) List of Students,
(2) Attendance,
(3) Copies of curricula of these courses/Diplomas, etc
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (conts)
• Have introduced any Value-adding course (with at least 30 contact
hours)? e.g., for M.A (English) students, a course on translation
studies from Kannada to English and vice-verse
• Are offering any Value-adding course more than once in an
academic year?
• Year-wise number of students completing these courses
Records:
(1) Approval records of BoS, Faculty, AC and/or university
communication
(2) Syllabus copies
(3) List of students admitted to these courses, their attendance register,
etc
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (conts)
• For how many programmes, field-work and/or internship based
project reports are mandatory? Specify the academic programmes
• How many students have taken up field-work and/or internship
based project reports?
• What is their %age? (to total student strength of the institution)
Records:
(1) Regulations copy (which specify the field-work and/or internship
based project report)
(2) List of students who have worked for their project reports
(3) Copies of project reports
Criterion – I: Curricular Aspects (100) (cont5)
• Have you collected the feedback from stakeholders such as students,
teachers, employers, alumni and parents about the course curricula?
• If collected, have you analysed the same?
• Have you submitted results of analysis to the Boards of Studies for
consideration and incorporation, if feasible, in the revised curricula?
• In the case of autonomous colleges, are you using the feedback while
revising the course curricula?
• Have you uploaded the summary of feedback to your website?
Records:
(1) Forms of duly filled feedback
(2) Analysis report
(3) Action taken based on the suggestions given by the stakeholders
Criterion – II: Teaching and Learning (350)
• Percentage of students from other states to total student strength
• Percentage of students from other countries to total students strength
• Percentage of students enrolled to intake – programme-wise
• Percentage of students enrolled to seats reserved for SC, ST, OBC,
General and Others
• Differently-abled students
programme-wise
gender-wise
%age of disability
Documents:
(1) List of students from other countries
(2) List of students from other states
(3) List of category-wise students – SC, ST, OBC, GM and others
(4) List of differently-abled students
Criterion – II: Teaching and Learning (350) (conts)
• Number of teachers using ICT
• ICT tools available
• Number of ICT-enabled/smart classrooms
Documents:
(1) List of Teachers using ICT
(2) List of ICT tools available
(3) Number of ICT-enabled/smart classrooms
(Lecture Hall – 1, 5, 8, etc)
Criterion – II: Teaching and Learning (350) (conts)
• Cadre-wise sanctioned teaching posts – subject-wise
• Cadre-wise teaching posts filled – subject-wise, category – SC, ST, OBC, etc, gender, M.Phil
holders, Doctorate holders (whether still serving, whether recognised as Research Guides, year of
recognition), within the state and outside the state,
• Year of appointment
• Number of years of experience (in the institution and total including other institutions)
• PAN
Documents:
(1) Sanction letters from the authorities
(2) Appointment orders
(3) Reporting letters
(4) Category certificates
(5) Educational qualification certificates – PG, M.Phil, Ph.D
(6) Guide recognition letter from the university
(7) Copies of PAN
Criterion – II: Teaching and Learning (350) (conts)