WRITING TASK 1

Line graph
The graph 1:
The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and
2010

GDP growth (annual%)

0
2007 2008 2009 2010
Tunisia Japan Ecuador

Graph 1

The given chart provides information about the annual GDP growth in Tunisia, Japan and
Ecuador over a period of 3 years, between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, Tunisia experienced a downward trend, while Japan showed an upward trend
throughout the period. Ecuador’s GDP had some fluctuations, differently from the other
countries. Although Japan initially1 had a lower GDP, it outraced2 the other two considered
countries at the end of the period.
Tunisia and Japan showed a similar but opposite trend. Tunisia’s GDP was about 6% in
2007, being higher than Japan’s and Ecuador’s one by ,respectively3, approximately 4% and

1
Initially: Ban đầu, lúc đầu
2
Outrace: Vượt trội, làm tốt hơn, nhanh hơn
3
Respectively: Lần lượt
3%. Then, it dipped to4almost four percent in 2008. Furthermore, it continued to decrease to
about 3.2% in 2009 and then hitting a low point of about 3% at the end of the period.
GPD value in Ecuador was less than 2% in 2007, and it increased in 2008, when all
countries shared a similar GPD value ( as opposed to what happened in the other years).
However, the figure experienced a dramatic fall in 2009 reaching the lowest value of about
1.2%. Then, although It slightly rose up to approximately more than 2% in 2010, it remained
outraced by both Japan and Tunisia.
The Gragh 2:
The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920
and 2000

The graph give the information about the comparison of change in the birth rates of both
China and USA from 1920 to 2000
Overall, the percentage of birth rates both China and the USA experienced a remarkeable
decline in over the period. Although birth rate of China initiately had a higher percent, it
decrease outracingly.
1920-1935: chênh lệch tương đối, nhỏ, USA tăng nhẹ so với TQ, nhưng cuối 1930 có sự
tăng từ từ 15%
1940-1955
cuối 1935, TQ giảm mạnh còn 5% , USA giảm nhẹ

4
Dipped to: Hạ xuống
giữa 1940- giữa 1945 : TQ ổn định
, và giữa năm 1940 giảm mạnh đạt mức thấp nhất trong cả quá trình còn sấp sỉ 5%
Giữa 1945- 1955:
Giữa 1945- 1950, cả 2 đều tăng TQ đạt cao nhất, USA tăng đến 10%
1955: TQ giảm mạnh, sấp sỉ 10% trong khi USA giảm từ từ
1960-2000: cả 2 đều giảm 1 cách từ từ đều đều, nhưng TQ có xu hướng giảm nhiều nhất,
thấp nhất sấp sỉ 3%
The graph 3:
The line graph show internet users as percentage of population.

The graph gives information about the number of people using the Internet from 1999 to
2009 ỉn 3 countries namely the USA, Canada, and Mexico.
Overall, It is clear that Internet Users in all three countries rise, whereas people used in
Canada show a remarkable increase throughout the period and in USA had some
fluctuations, differently from the other countries.
Both of the USA và Canada seen significant growth. From 2001 to 2005, the percentage of
people using the Internet in the USA initially rise, then it fluctuated slightly, while Canada
outraced the other two considered countries at the same time. The Internet users in Canada
hit the highest point whilst USA which showed the similar trend was a slight decrease in
2009
The proportion of people using the Internet in Mexico saw a sharp rise between 2001 and
2005, but it was still far behind the other two countries. There was a gradual increase from
2006 to 2009 and hit the lowest point in 2009
The graph 4:

The line graph gives information about how many tonnes of wastes were discharged by three
companies from 2000 to 2015
Overall, it is clear that both of two enterprises A and B decrease dramatically, while the
remaining company outraced the other two considered at the end of the period.
( Samples overview: It is clear that there were significant changes in the amounts of waste
produced by all three companies shown on the graph. While companies A and B saw waste
output fall over the 15-years period, the amount of waste produced by company C increased
considerably)
In 2000, the amount of wastes company A led the first with 12 tonnes. From 2000 to 2005,
the sewages which were discharged by company B and C was respectively about 6 and 10
tonnes, 2 times as much as that of previous sewages, while there was a gradual decrease to
approximately 10 tonnes by company A
From 2005 onwards, the amount of the sewages witnessed a sharp decrease by both of two
companies A and B. The wastes of company B was decrease about 10 tonnes, 2 times as
much as that of company A. While, the company C constantly increase and outraced the
other two companies.
(Sample Detail: In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, while companies B and
C produced around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste material respectively. Over the following
5 years, the waste output of companies B and C rose by around 2 tonnes, but the figure for
company A fell by approximately 1 tonne.
From 2005 to 2015, company A cut waste production by roughly5 3 tonnes, and company B
reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. By contrast, company C saw an increase in waste
production of approximately 4 tonnes over the same 10-year period. By 2015, company C’s
waste output had risen to 10 tonnes, while the respective amounts of waste from companies
A and B had dropped to 8 tonnes and only 3 tonnes)

Bar charts
Bar 1:

5
Roughly: sấp sỉ, khoảng
The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the
Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire
was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.
The two bar chart illustrate how different customer service was rated by 100 guests to
the Parkway Hotel percentagewise in the years 2005 and 2010
Overall, there was a remarkable change in satisfactory almost Visitors rated for
quality services excellent, satisfactory and good. In contrast, the proportion of
unsatisfactory significant decrease over the period of 5 years

Mix-chart
Bar 2: The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian
household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from
this energy use.