On Hecke Fields Fields: The For and Class Number
On Hecke Fields Fields: The For and Class Number
Japan
Vol. 25, No. 4, 1973
Introduction.
It was shown by Shimura [3, \S 7.7], [5] that the eigen-values of Hecke
operators for the cusp forms of “ Neben ”-type (in Hecke’s sense) are closely
connected with the reciprocity law in certain abelian extensions of a real
quadratic field, and such extensions can be generated by the coordinates of
certain points of finite order on an abelian variety associated with the cusp
forms. Especially, in [5], some fundamental theorems about a class-field-
theoretical treatment of these extensions in the case of arbitrary levels, and
various detailed examples in the case of square-free levels were given. As
a continuation of this theory, we are naturally led to investigate the eigen-
values of Hecke operators for the cusp forms of an arbitrary level, especially,
the case in which the level is divisible by a prime power $p^{n}(n>1)$ . Recently,
H. Hijikata [1] has succeeded in extending the result of Eichler (the trace
“ “
formula for Hecke operators) to arbitrary levels including both Haupt and
“
Neben ”-types, and moreover, aPplying this Hijikata’s formula, in [7], one
of the authors of the present note has given an explicit trace formula for
a certain restricted part of the space of cusp forms of Haupt ”-type for ”
we can also expect to develop the idea of [5] in the case of Haupt ”-type ”
“
Neben “-type (see text or [6]). Now one of the aims of the present note
(\S 1 and \S 2 below) is to investigate this abelian variety. More precisely, take
a cusp form $f(z)$ (which is a common eigen-function of Hecke operators) of
weight 2 with respect to $n>1$ of
$\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}),$
”
Haupt ”-type. By applying the
result of [6] to the group
630 K. DOI and M. YAMAUCm
$f(z)$ , we can obtain $A$ rational over $Q$ and rational over a quadratic ex- $n$
tension of $k$
$Q$ , which form a system similar to the type of abelian varieties
discussed in [5, \S 9]. (Note that in the present case, the field $K$ generated
over $Q$ by the Fourier coefficients of $f(z)$ in question, is not a CM-field.) In
\S 2, by giving a few examples ( $N=p^{3},$ $p=5$ and 7), we shall discuss some
arithmetical properties of $A$ corresponding to $f(z)$ and show that the co-
ordinates of some specific points of finite order on such an $A$ can generate
an abelian extension of . (The field can be either real or imaginary.)
$k$ $k$
(As mentioned at the beginning, such a case is not included in the examples
of [5].) Namely, we shall consider the space for several primes $S_{2}(4M, (\underline{J1f}))$
$M\equiv 1$ (mod4).
Here we denote by the space of all cusp forms $S_{2}(4M, (^{\underline{M}}))$
of “ Neben ”-type of weight 2 with respect to , and the quadratic $\Gamma_{0}(4M)$ $(^{\underline{M}})$
residue symbol. Repeating the same procedure as in [5], here we also obtain
a certain abelian extension of the real quadratic field $Q(\sqrt{M})$ . One should
notice that, in these cases, the conductor of such an extension is divisible
by a prime factor of 2, and although the present observation deals with only
the cases of level $=4M$, it seems that these are typical enough in extending
the same investigation* for the levels containing a factor of another prime
power . $p^{n}$
One can find a few more examples of the characteristic polynomials of Hecke
$r$
operators for the level $=3^{2}\cdot M$ in H. Hijikata’s article on the ”Seminar on modern
methods in Number theory”, Tokyo, (1971).
On the Hecke operatOrs for $\Gamma_{0}(N)$ 631
of level . Let
$N$ denote the jacobian variety of and
$J_{\Gamma}=J$ the $\mathfrak{H}^{*}/\Gamma$ $S_{2}(\Gamma)$
vector space of all holomorphic cusp forms on , of weight 2 with respect $\mathfrak{H}$
$p^{n},$
$n>1$ and
$\Gamma=\{\left(\begin{array}{ll}a & b\\c & d\end{array}\right)\in\Gamma_{0}(p^{n})|a\equiv d\equiv 1(mod p)\}$
.
Here we shall recall a few facts in [6]. It is known that $J$
is defined over $Q$ .
Let $f(z)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}a_{m}e^{2\pi imz}$ , with $a_{1}=1$ , be an element of $S_{2}(\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}))$
, that is a common
eigen-function of Hecke operators $T_{m}$
for all $m$ . Then $f(z)$ is also an eigen-
function as an element of $S_{2}(\Gamma)$ (see [3, Prop. 3.36]). Let $K$ be the subfield
of $C$ generated over $Q$ by $a_{m}$ for all $m$ . (Note that $K$ is a totally real
algebraic number field.) Then we can aPply the argument of [6, \S 1] for
these and $K$. By [6, Th. 1], we know that
$\Gamma,$ $J,$ $f$
(ii) is an isomorphism of
$\theta$
$K$ into End $(A)\otimes Q$ such that $\nu\circ\xi_{m}=\theta(a_{m})\cdot\nu$
set of conditions (4.8) in [6, \S 4]. Therefore, as (4.9) in [6, \S 4], we suppose
that the following condition is satisfied:
$(*)$ There is an automorPhism of $K$, other than the identity map, such that
$\rho$
$\chi(m)\cdot a_{m}=a_{m}^{\rho}$
for all . (This implies esPecially that
$m$ and $a_{m}=0$ $\rho^{2}=1$
satisfies
(i) $\eta^{\epsilon}=-\eta$
if $\epsilon$
obtain the couple having the properties (1.1) and (1.2). Let $F$ be the $(A, \theta)$
obvious modification, the conditions (9.1-5) in [5, \S 9]. (In the notation of
[5, \S 9], take as $\theta(d)=x(-1)\cdot p\cdot id_{A}$ and $\theta(h)=\eta$ . The field $K$ in the present
case is not a CM-field as assumed there.)
Let and denote the ring of all algebraic integers in $K$ and $F$,
$\mathfrak{o}_{K}$ $0_{F}$
$x^{o}=-x$ . Also define the ideals and , exactly in the same manner as in $\mathfrak{b}$
$\mathfrak{c}$
$\mathfrak{x}=\{t\in A|\theta(\mathfrak{b})t=0\}$ .
By means of the same reasoning as in [5, \S 9], X is -isomorphic to , $\mathfrak{o}_{K}$
$(\mathfrak{o}_{K}/\mathfrak{b})^{2}$
and acts on as an
$\eta$ endomorphism. Now let us assume, as (9.8) in [5, \S 9];
$\mathfrak{x}$
.
With such an , put $e$
$\mathfrak{y}=\{t\in \mathfrak{x}|(\eta-\theta(e))t=0\}$ ,
$\mathfrak{z}=\{t\in \mathfrak{x}|(\eta+\theta(e))t=0\}r$
and $\mathfrak{z}$
are $\mathfrak{o}_{F^{-}}isomorphic$
to $0_{F}/\mathfrak{c}$
, and $\mathfrak{x}=\mathfrak{y}\oplus \mathfrak{z}$
.
Let and $k(\mathfrak{x})$
(resp. $k(\mathfrak{y})$ $k(\mathfrak{z})$
extension of over which
) denote the smallest $k$
injective homomorphism
Gal $(k(\mathfrak{x})/k)\rightarrow(\mathfrak{o}_{F}/c)^{\times}\times(\mathfrak{v}_{F}/\mathfrak{c})^{\times}$
-valued characters as
” “
of $(Z/pz)^{\times}$
of order 2.
Let denote the essential part (see [2, p. 176] or [5, \S 1]) of
$S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}))$
“ “
$S_{2}(\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}))$
. For an obvious reason, it is necessary and natural to investigate
the common eigen-functions $f(z)=\sum_{m=1}^{\varpi}a_{m}e^{2\pi imz}$
of Hecke operators $T_{m}$ (for all m)
in $S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}))$
. In
the following tables we shall give the characteristic polyno-
mials of for a several primes $m$ in
$T_{m}$
, with $N=p^{3},$ $p=5$ and 7. $S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma_{0}(p^{n}))$
(Of course each of the characteristic roots of these polynomials gives the
m-th Fourier coefficients for some $f(z).)$ Let $K$ denote, for a fixed , the
$a_{m}$ $f$
subfield of $C$ generated over $Q$ by the coefficients for all $m$ . $a_{m}$
(a) $N=5^{3}$
$(b_{1})$ $N=7^{3}$
634 K. DOI and M. YAMAUCHI
.
Let us now consider the special case $N=5^{3}$ . We have dim $S_{2}(\Gamma_{0}(5^{3}))$
“ “
denotes also the essential part of In the table (a), the columns $S_{2}(\Gamma^{*}(N)).)$
of
$\{f\}$
and on account of (2.1). The remaining 4-dimensional
$S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma^{*}(5^{3}))$ $\{f_{\chi}\}$
part II is most interesting because, as the table shows, the field $K$ and the
$eigen\cdot functionsf(z)$ corresponding to this part satisfy the assumption in $(*)$
. .
fix the field $K$ generated over $Q$ by one of the roots
$e$
isomorphisms of $K$ into . Then by [5, Prop. 1.2], and all its companions
$C$ $f$
“ ”
in \S 1, the condition
$S_{2}(\Gamma)$
is satisfied. Thus we obtain a system , $(*)$ $\{(A, \theta)$
of all algebraic integers in . In the present case we see that $b_{0}=b=$ $k$
$(\sqrt{4+\sqrt{5}}),$ $\mathfrak{c}=(4+\sqrt{5})$
. Therefore the condition $(**)$ in \S 1
$\chi(-1)\cdot 5\equiv e^{2}(mod (4+\sqrt{5})$
On the Hecke operatOrs for $\Gamma_{0}(N)$
635
REMARK 2.1. It was indicated by Shimura [3, \S 7.7], [5, p. 148] that in
the Neben “-type case,
“
and $Tr_{k/Q}(u)$ have a non-trivial common factor, $N(\mathfrak{c})$
of . Here we remark that in the present case there is still some relation
$k$
then the table of part II shows that and consist of the same $N(\mathfrak{c})$ $Tr_{k/Q}(u^{5})$
prime factor 11. This fact will be used in the later discussion.
Now let us consider the structure of the extension especially, $k(t))/k$ $k(\mathfrak{x})/k,$
$\mathfrak{x}=\{t\in A|\theta(\mathfrak{b})t=0\}$
$\mathfrak{y}=\{t\in \mathfrak{x}|(\eta-\theta(e))t=0\}$
.
We use the same notation as that of [5] in the following discussion, except
for a minor obvious change. As mentioned at the end of \S 1, from the action
of Gal on we obtain an injective homomorphism
$(k(\mathfrak{y})/k)$ $y$
$r^{\prime}$
: Gal $(k(\mathfrak{y})/k)\rightarrow(0_{F}/\mathfrak{c})^{\times}\cong(Z/11Z)^{\times}$
nductor 5
$co$ with a prime factor of 11 in . The$\cdot q\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$ $q$
$k$
archimedean prime $\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
of is uniquely
$k$
determined for by the condition that $q$ $v<0$ at for every $\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
$v\in 0_{k}^{\times}$
such that $N_{k/Q}(\iota)=-1$ and $v\equiv 1$
(mod q). Moreover, one has
$ r((\alpha))=(\frac{\alpha}{\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}})\cdot\varphi(\alpha)\cdot\mu$ ( $\alpha$
mod q) ,
and $\varphi$
is a homomorphism (character) of onto of order 10 such
$(\mathfrak{o}_{k}/(5))^{\times}$ $(0_{F}/\mathfrak{c})^{\times}$
that
$\varphi(m)=x(m)$
for $m\in Z$ .
It should be noted that in the present case, the invariant subfield under $F$
PROOF. It is known that every finite prime factor of the conductor $\mathfrak{p}$
$\mathfrak{f}$
following form
$\mathfrak{f}=\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}^{a}\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}^{\epsilon b}\cdot\prod_{\mathfrak{p}}\mathfrak{p}^{f_{\mathfrak{p}}}$ , $0\leqq a,$ $b\leqq 1$ ,
with the prime factors of 5 in . APplying [3, (7.5.1)] for the present $\mathfrak{p}$
$\cdot 11$ $k$
and by the same argument as in the proof of [5, Th. 2.3], we first obtain
$\Gamma$
636 K. DOI and M. YAMAUCHI
(2.2) $ r((m))=(\frac{m}{p_{\infty}})\chi(m)\cdot$ ( $m$ mod q) for every $m\in Z$ prime to 5 , where $\cdot q$ $p_{\infty}$
7.32]. For the determination of , we can use the following fact which is $f_{\mathfrak{q}^{\epsilon}}$
(2.3) Let be the finite part of . Let be a rational prime which divides
$\mathfrak{f}_{0}$
$f$
$q$
$(4+\sqrt{5})$ . Then is divisible by only one of the two prime factors of $t_{0}$
$r(q^{\epsilon})\equiv a_{q}$
(mod c).
Take $q=11$ . From the table (a), $a_{11}=2$ . Therefore one has . Hence $f_{q^{\epsilon}}=0$
is of the form
$\mathfrak{f}_{0}$$\sqrt{5}mq$
. By means of Hasse’s conductor ramification theorem
$1\leqq m\leqq 2$ . On the other hand, we can easily check
and (2.2) we know that
that the smallest exponent which satisPes mod { is a multiple of 5, $n$ $u^{n}\equiv 1$ $C$
before, this must be divisible by 5), one can not have $m=1$ . Hence . $\mathfrak{f}_{0}=5\cdot q$
By the same argument as in [5, Prop. 2.5], we know that is divisible by $\mathfrak{f}$
exactly one of the two archimedean primes of , say . Thus . $k$ $\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$ $t=5q\cdot \mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
$q$ $\varphi$
$(0_{k}/(5))^{\times}$ $(0_{F}/\mathfrak{c})^{\times}$
the order of . Let us take again $q=11$ . By (2.3), one has $\varphi$
$r(q)^{\epsilon}\equiv a_{11}=2$
mod $(4+\sqrt{5})$ . Hence mod $(4+\sqrt{5})$ . Hence . On the other $\varphi(q^{\epsilon})\equiv 3$ $\varphi(q^{\epsilon})^{5}=1$
hand, $\varphi(m)=\chi(m)$ for $m\in Z$. Therefore the order of is 10. If , $\varphi$
$v\in \mathfrak{o}_{k}^{\times}$
$N_{k/Q}(v)=-1$ and mod then $v=\pm u^{5n}$ with an odd integer . Obviously $v\equiv 1$ $q$ $n$
maximal ray class field of conductor by considering its degree. $\mathfrak{f}=5\cdot q\cdot \mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
.$i$
decomposes into two distinct primes
$e.,$ $p$
and in $k=Q(\sqrt{5})$ . $\mathfrak{p}=\gamma 0_{k}$ $\mathfrak{p}^{\epsilon}=\gamma^{\epsilon}0_{k}$
On the Hecke operat0rs for $\Gamma_{0}(N)$ 637
mod (5), if
$\gamma\equiv\pm 1$ $p\equiv 1$
mod 5 or mod (5) if $p\equiv-1$ mod 5. Then $\gamma\equiv\pm 2$
mod , if
$a_{p}\equiv\gamma+\gamma^{\epsilon}$ $\mathfrak{c}$
$p\equiv 1$
mod 5 or mod , if $p\equiv-1$ mod 5. $a_{p}\equiv-(\gamma+\gamma^{\epsilon})$ $\mathfrak{c}$
$B=(\theta(\sqrt{5})+\eta)A$ .
Then $B$ is rational over $A=B+B^{\epsilon},$ , and $B\cap B^{S}$ is a $k,$ $B^{\epsilon}=(\theta(\sqrt 5^{-})-\eta)A$
to for every
$B$ $a\in F$ . Then is an isomorphism of $F$ into $End_{Q}(B)$ . We $\theta_{F}$
completes the proof by the same argument as that of [3, Th. 7.39].
As the second example, let us consider the case $N=7^{3}$ . We have
dim and dim . Each eigen-function which belongs
$S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma_{0}(7^{3}))=24$ $S_{2}^{0}(\Gamma^{*}(7^{3}))=9$
case $N=5^{3}$ . We fix our attention to this part III. In the present case the
field $k$
which corresponds to $\chi$
$=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}a_{m}e^{2\gamma_{\vee}^{\sim}imz}$
, and fix the field $K$ generated over $Q$ by one of the roots
$X^{6}-20X^{4}+124X^{2}-232=0,$ $e$
. . we take
$g$
$a_{3}=\sqrt{2(3-\alpha_{0})}$
, and $K=F_{7}(\sqrt{2(3-\alpha_{0})})$
.
The field has the non-trivial automorphism
$K$ of order 2 with the fixed $\rho$
can make the following observation, although we do not know to what extent
this is true in general. Observe that is one of the fundamental unit of . $\alpha_{0}$
$F_{7}$
PROPOSITION 2.5. The field is a ray class field over of conductor $k(\mathfrak{y})$ $k$
638 K. DOI and M. YAMAUCHI
$7\cdot \mathfrak{q}$
with a prime factor $\mathfrak{q}$
of 29 in $k$
, and one has
$ r((\alpha))=\varphi(\alpha)\cdot\mu$ ( $\alpha$
mod q)
for every prime to 7$\alpha$
in $k$ $\cdot$
and $\varphi$
is a homomorphism of $(\mathfrak{o}_{k}/(7))^{\times}$
into of order 14 such that
$(0_{F}/(3-\alpha_{0}))^{\times}$
$\varphi(m)=x(m)$
for .
$m\in Z$
$q$
.
From the table $(b_{2})$
and the numerical observation about several $a_{m}$ (not given
here), one has Hence $(a_{29},3-\alpha_{0})=1$ .
$a_{29}=\alpha_{0}(3-\beta_{0})$
with $\beta_{0}=e\frac{4\pi i}{7}\frac{-4\pi i}{7}+e$
we know the order of is 28. Hence $m=2$ (by the same argument as in the $r$
proof of Proposition 2.2). This proves the first assertion. Using the same
fact as (2.3) in the present case, one has mod , hence $r(q^{\epsilon})\equiv a_{29}$ $(3-\alpha_{0})$ $\varphi(q^{\epsilon})\equiv 23$
REMARK 2.6. Let be a rational prime such that $\chi(p)=1,$ . de- $p$ $i$
$e.,$ $p$
composes into two distinct primes and in $k=Q(’-7)$ . can $\mathfrak{p}=\gamma \mathfrak{o}_{k}$ $\mathfrak{p}^{\epsilon}=\gamma^{\epsilon}\mathfrak{o}_{k}$
$\gamma$
and
$\pi$
be the solutions of $X^{2}-a_{p}X+p\equiv
$\pi^{\prime}$
0$ mod . Then again by [5, Th. $\mathfrak{c}$
$B=\xi A$ .
Then $B$
is rational over $k,$ $A=B+B^{\epsilon},$ $B^{\epsilon}=\xi^{\epsilon}A$
. Applying (1.2) to $\xi^{\epsilon}$
, one
has $\xi^{\epsilon}=a+b\theta(\delta)-c\eta-d\theta(\delta)\eta$
and $\xi\cdot\xi^{\prime}=\xi^{\epsilon}\cdot\xi^{\prime\xi}=0$
. Take an element $\xi t=\xi^{\epsilon}t^{\prime}$
PROPOSITION 2.7. The notation being as above, the abelian variety is $B$
, $\mathfrak{p}$
$N\mathfrak{p}=p$
$\chi(p)=1$ . Take $p=2$ and 11. By the table , we know that $(b_{2})$ $F(\varphi_{2})\not\cong F(\varphi_{11})$
\S 3. The case of “
Neben ”-type of level $4M,$ $M\equiv 1(mod 4)$ .
Throughout this section, we assume that $M$ is a prime and $\equiv 1(mod 4)$ .
We shall use freely the same notation and terminology in [5, \S 2]. Let
denote the ” essential part of
$S_{2}^{0}(4M, (^{\underline{M}}))$
(see [2], [5, \S 1]).
”
$S_{2}(4M, (^{\underline{Jf}}))$
$f(z)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}a_{m}e^{2\pi imz}$
of $S_{2}^{0}(4M, (^{\underline{M}}))$
. The table (c) (resp. $(d)$ ) gives the Fourier
coefficients $a_{p}$for $M=29$ (resp. $M=53,61,101$ ). Let denote the quadratic $k$
$N_{k/Q}(u-1)$ have the same prime factor 5). From these data, it seems that
and $N_{k/Q}(u^{l}-1)$
$N(\mathfrak{c})$
( depends on the square factor of the level) have a non-
$l$
trivial common factor. Let and denote the rings of all algebraic integers $0_{k}$ $\mathfrak{o}_{F}$
the coordinates of the points of (see [5, (2.7), (2.8)]). Let us now discuss $\mathfrak{y}$
In this case, we have $K=Q(\sqrt{-7}),$ $F=Q,$ $k=Q(\sqrt{29})$ $\dim S_{2}^{0}(4\cdot 29, (^{\underline{29}}))=2,$
and .
$\mathfrak{c}=(7)$
PROPOSITION 3.1. The field is the maximal ray class field over of $k(\mathfrak{y})$ $k$
of $q$
$k$ $\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
such that $N_{k/Q}(v)=-1$ and (mod q). Moreover one has $v\equiv 1$
$ r((\alpha))=(\frac{\alpha}{\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}})\cdot\lambda$ ( $\alpha$
mod (2)) $\cdot\mu$ ( $\alpha$
mod q)
The following method of proof is the same as that of [5, Prop. 7.1].
PROOF. First we observe that the finite part of $t(r)$ is divisible by the
prime factors of 2 . As the table (c) shows, $a_{7}=-2$ is prime to . $\cdot 7$ $\mathfrak{c}=7$
Therefore, on account of [5, Th. 2.8, Prop. 2.4 and Prop. 2.5] is of the $\mathfrak{f}(r)$
$ r((\alpha))=(\frac{\alpha}{\mathfrak{p}_{\infty}})\lambda$ ( $\alpha$
mod $2^{c}$
) $\cdot\mu$ ( $\alpha$
mod q)
.
$(0_{k}/(2)^{c})^{\times}$
$\mu$
$(\mathfrak{o}_{k}/q)^{\times}$ $(Z/(7))^{\times}$
Let $U$
be the group of all (2)-units in the (2)-completion of , and let $k$
$U_{n}=$ { $u\in U|u\equiv 1$ mod (2) } for every integer . Define a -valued $n\geqq 0$ $(Z/(7))^{\times}$
such that $U_{n}\subset Ker(\pi)$ . Since is of order 6, we have $\pi^{6}=1$ . Now it $(Z/(7))^{\times}$
have $1=r((m))=\pi(m)$ , which shows that . Now observe that $U/U_{1}$ $U_{1}\subset Ker(\pi)$
is isomorphic to $(\mathfrak{o}_{k}/(2))$
Take $13=N_{k/Q}(\beta_{0})$ with $\beta_{0}=\frac{49\pm 9\cdot\sqrt{29}}{2}$
. Then
satisfies
$r((\beta_{0}))$
$X^{2}-a_{13}X+13\equiv 0$ mod 7.
Since $a_{13}=5$ , we see that the order of $r((\beta_{0}))$
is 3 or 6. We have, on
the other hand, $\beta_{0}\equiv 1$
mod $q$
with $\beta_{0}=\frac{49+9\sqrt{29}}{2}$
or $\frac{49-9\sqrt{29}}{2}$
Therefore
$\pi(\beta_{0})=r((\beta_{0}))\neq 1$ . Clearly, $\beta_{0}\not\equiv 1$
mod 2. Hence is generated by
$U/U_{1}$ and $\beta_{0}$
one sees that the extension is the maximal ray class field of conductor $k(\mathfrak{y})/k$
$q\cdot \mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
By the same argument as above and referring to the following table (d),
one can obtain the maximal ray class field over $k=Q(\prime M)$ for each $k(\mathfrak{y})$
$M=53,61$ and 101, of conductor 2 with $N_{k/Q}(0)=13$ , 127 and 5, respectively. $\cdot$
$q\cdot \mathfrak{p}_{\infty}$
The verification for these cases is left to the reader as an exercise. The
authors have also found a few more examples of the same nature for
$S_{2}(4M, \psi)$ with a positive prime integer $M\equiv 3$
mod (4) and a non-trivial real
character of , which will not be discussed here. $\psi$ $(Z/4M)^{\times}$
642 K. DOI and M. $YAM\Lambda UClI1$
$41014614534.\cdot.\cdot M$
$|$
References
[1] H. Hijikata, Explicit formula of the traces of Hecke operators for , to $\Gamma_{0}(N)$
94 (1971), 174-189.
[3] G. Shimura, Introduction to the arithmetic theory of automorphic functions,
Publ. Math. Soc. Japan, No. 11, Iwanami Shoten and Princeton University Press,
On the Hecke operators for $\Gamma_{0}(N)$ 643
1971.
[4] G. Shimura, On elliptic curves with complex multiplication as factors of the
jacobians of modular function fields, Nagoya Math. J., 43 (1971), 199-208.
[5] G. Shimura, Class fields over real quadratic fields and Hecke operators, Ann
of Math., 95 (1972), 130-190.
[6] G. Shimura, On the factors of the jacobian variety of a modular function field,
to appear
[7] M. Yamauchi, On the traces of Hecke operators for a normalizer of , to
$\Gamma_{0}(N)$