Consolidation Exercises With Asnwer
Consolidation Exercises With Asnwer
On January 1, 20x1, the fair value of the assets and liabilities of XYZ, Inc. were determined
by appraisal, as follows:
Carryin Fair
g value
XYZ, Inc.
amount Fair incremen
s values t
Cash 20,000 20,000 -
Accounts receivable 48,000 48,000 -
Inventory 92,000 124,000 32,000
Equipment 200,000 240,000 40,000
Accumulated (48,000
(40,000) (8,000)
depreciation )
(24,000
(24,000) -
Accounts payable )
296,00 360,00
64,000
Net assets 0 0
The equipment has a remaining useful life as of 4 years from January 1, 20x1.
On January 1, 20x1, the fair values of the assets and liabilities of XYZ, Inc. were determined
by appraisal, as follows:
Carryin Fair
g value
XYZ, Inc.
amount Fair incremen
s values t
Cash 20,000 20,000 -
Accounts receivable 48,000 48,000 -
Inventory 92,000 124,000 32,000
Equipment 200,000 240,000 40,000
Accumulated
(40,000) (48,000) (8,000)
depreciation
Accounts payable (24,000) (24,000) -
360,00
296,000 64,000
Net assets 0
The remaining useful life of the equipment is 4 years.
During 20x1, no dividends were declared by either ABC or XYZ. There were also no inter-
company transactions. The group determined that there is no goodwill impairment.
ABC’s and XYZ’s individual financial statements at year-end are shown below:
On January 1, 20x1, the fair values of the assets and liabilities of XYZ, Inc. were determined
by appraisal, as follows:
Fair value
XYZ, Inc.
Carrying amounts Fair values increment
Cash 20,000 20,000 -
Accounts receivable 48,000 48,000 -
Inventory 92,000 124,000 32,000
Equipment 200,000 240,000 40,000
Accumulated depreciation (40,000) (48,000) (8,000)
Accounts payable (24,000) (24,000) -
Net assets 296,000 360,000 64,000
The remaining useful life of the equipment is 4 years.
During 20x1, no dividends were declared by either ABC or XYZ. There were also no inter-
company transactions. The group determined that there is no goodwill impairment.
ABC’s and XYZ’s individual financial statements at year-end are shown below:
10. How much is the consolidated total equity as of December 31, 20x1?
a. 1,492,000 b. 1,415,000 c. 1,412,000 d. 1,495,000
KEY TO CORRECTION
Answers at a glance:
1. A 6. D
2. C 7. A
3. B 8. B
4. B 9. B
5. B 10. D
Solution:
1. A
Solution:
Total assets of parent 1,040,000
Total assets of subsidiary 320,000
Investment in subsidiary -
Fair value adjustments - net 64,000
Goodwill – net* 12,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 1,436,000
2. C
Solution:
Share capital of parent [480,000 + (5,000sh. x 40par)] 680,000
Share premium of parent {160,000 + [5,000sh. x (60 – 40)]} 260,000
Consolidated retained earnings – (parent only) 200,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 1,140,000
Non-controlling interests (360,000 x 20%) 72,000
Consolidated total equity 1,212,000
3. B
Solution:
Total assets of parent 1,040,000
Total assets of subsidiary 320,000
Investment in subsidiary -
Fair value adjustments - net 64,000
Goodwill – net* 15,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 1,439,000
4. B
Solution:
Share capital of parent [480,000 + (5,000sh. x 40par)] 680,000
Share premium of parent {160,000 + [5,000sh. x (60 – 40)]} 260,000
Consolidated retained earnings – (parent only) 200,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 1,140,000
Non-controlling interests 75,000
Consolidated total equity 1,215,000
5. B
Solution:
Parent Subsidiary Consolidated
Profits before adjustments 240,000 80,000 320,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Unrealized profits ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Dividend income from subsidiary ( - ) N/A ( - )
Gain or loss on extinguishment
of bonds ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Net consolidation adjustments ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Profits before FVA 240,000 80,000 320,000
Depreciation of FVA* (32,000) (8,000) (40,000)
Impairment loss on goodwill ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Consolidated profit 208,000 72,000 280,000
6. D
Solution:
Total assets of parent 1,672,000
Total assets of subsidiary 496,000
Investment in subsidiary (300,000)
Fair value adjustments – net (64,000 – 40,000 dep’n.) 24,000
Goodwill – net* 12,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 1,904,000
7. A
Solution:
Analysis of net assets
Consoli-dation
Subsidiary Acquisition date
date
Net change
Share capital (& Share premium) 200,000 200,000
Retained earnings 96,000 176,000
Totals at carrying amounts 296,000 376,000
FVA at acquisition 64,000 64,000
Subsequent depn. Of FVA NIL (40,000)
Unrealized profits (Upstream only) NIL -
Net assets at fair value 360,000 400,000 40,000
8. B
Solution:
Parent Subsidiary Consolidated
Profits before adjustments 240,000 80,000 320,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Unrealized profits ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Dividend income from subsidiary ( - ) N/A ( - )
Gain or loss on extinguishment
of bonds ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Net consolidation adjustments ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Profits before FVA 240,000 80,000 320,000
Depreciation of FVA* (32,000) (8,000) (40,000)
Impairment loss on goodwill ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Consolidated profit 208,000 72,000 280,000
9. B
Solution:
Total assets of parent 1,672,000
Total assets of subsidiary 496,000
Investment in subsidiary (300,000)
Fair value adjustments – net (64,000 – 40,000 dep’n.) 24,000
Goodwill – net* 15,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 1,907,000
10. B
Solution:
Analysis of net assets
Consoli-dation
Subsidiary Acquisition date
date
Net change
Share capital (& Share premium) 200,000 200,000
Retained earnings 96,000 176,000
Totals at carrying amounts 296,000 376,000
FVA at acquisition 64,000 64,000
Subsequent depn. Of FVA NIL (40,000)
Unrealized profits (Upstream only) NIL -
Net assets at fair value 360,000 400,000 40,000
Chapter 17
Consolidated Financial Statements (Part 2)
1. How much is the consolidated “equipment – net” in the December 31, 20x2 financial
statements?
a. 3,968,000 b. 3,628,000 c. 3,428,000 d. 3,328,000
2. The consolidation journal entry for the depreciation of the fair value adjustment on
December 31, 20x2 includes
a. debit to accumulated depreciation for ₱128,000
b. credit to accumulated depreciation for ₱128,000
c. debit to depreciation expense for ₱64,000
d. debit to retained earnings of Popo Co. for ₱51,200
Since the acquisition date, Owlet has made accumulated profits of ₱800,000. There have
been no changes in Owlet’s share capital since acquisition date. The group determined that
goodwill has been impaired by ₱32,000.
A summary of the individual statements of financial positions of the entities as at the end of
reporting period is shown below:
Owlet
Owl Co. Co.
2,000,00
4,000,000
Total assets 0
During 20x1, Rooster sold goods to Cockerel for ₱600,000, having bought them for
₱480,000. A quarter of these goods remain unsold at year-end. Goodwill on acquisition of
Cockerel has been tested for impairment and found to be impaired (in total) by ₱32,000 for
the current year.
The individual statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the entities
for the year ended December 31, 20x1 are shown below:
14. How much is the profit attributable to owners of the parent and NCI, respectively?
Owners of Parent NCI
a. 1,391,000 175,000
b. 1,367,000 167,000
c. 1,391,000 173,000
d. 1,384,000 190,000
15. How much is the comprehensive income attributable to owners of the parent and NCI,
respectively?
Owners of Parent NCI
a. 1,663,000 267,000
b. 1,778,000 192,000
c. 1,756,000 206,000
d. 1,738,000 192,000
During the last month of the year, Piglet sold goods to Pig for ₱324,000. Piglet had marked
up these goods by 50% on cost. One-third of these goods remain unsold at year-end. The
group assessed that there is no impairment loss on goodwill for the current year.
The individual statements of profit or loss of the entities for the year ended December 31,
20x1 are shown below:
All of Piglet’s income and expenses (including profit from inter-company sale) were earned
and incurred evenly during the year.
19. How much is the profit attributable to owners of the parent and NCI, respectively?
Owners of Parent NCI
a. 1,040,000 60,000
b. 1,049,000 51,000
c. 1,036,000 544,000
d. 1,049,000 311,000
Bear and Cub reported individual profits of ₱936,000 and ₱700,000, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 20x1. Neither company declared dividends. There are 3-year
dividends in arrears on the outstanding cumulative preference shares of Cub Co. It was
assessed that goodwill is not impaired.
How much is the profit attributable to owners of the parent and NCI, respectively?
Owners of Parent NCI
a. 1,425,000 163,000
b. 1,377,000 163,000
c. 1,377,000 211,000
d. 1,425,000 211,000
KEY TO CORRECTION
Answers at a glance:
1. D 6. C 11. B 16. D
2. A 7. C 12. D 17. A
3. C 8. A 13. B 18. A
4. A 9. B 14. B 19. B
5. D 10. A 15. D 20. D
Solution:
1. D
Solution:
Equipment, net – Lion Co. (800,000 x 8/10) 2,560,000
Equipment, net – Cub Co. (fair value) (1,280,000 x 3/5) 768,000
Consolidated equipment, net – Dec. 31, 20x2 3,328,000
2. A
Solution:
Dec. Accumulated depreciation (320K x 2/5) 128,00
31,
Depreciation expense (320K ÷ 5) 0 64,000
20x2
Retained earnings – Lion Co.* 51,200
Retained earnings – Cub Co.* 12,800
*These are the shares of Lion and Cub in the depreciation of the FVA in the prior year, i.e., 20x1 (64,000 x 80% & 20%).
3. C
Solution:
Equipment, net – Kangaroo 2,000,000
Equipment, net – Joey 1,200,000
FVA on equipment, net - increment [(480,000 – 400,000) x 8/10] 64,000
Consolidated equipment, net – Dec. 31, 20x2 3,264,000
4. A
Solution:
Analysis of net assets
Acquisition Consolidation
Owlet Co. date date
Net change
Share capital 400,000 400,000
Retained earnings (1.12M – 800K) 320,000 1,120,000
Totals at carrying amounts 720,000 1,520,000
Fair value adjustments at acquisition date - -
Subsequent depreciation of FVA NIL -
Unrealized profits (Upstream only) NIL -
Subsidiary's net assets at fair value 720,000 1,520,000 800,000
5. D
Solution:
Consideration transferred (given) 600,000
Less: Previously held equity interest in the acquiree -
Total 600,000
Less: Parent's proportionate share in the net assets of subsidiary (₱720,000
acquisition-date fair value x 75%) (540,000)
Goodwill attributable to owners of parent – acquisition date 60,000
Less: Parent’s share in goodwill impairment (₱32K x 75%) (24,000)
Goodwill attributable to owners of parent – current year 36,000
Fair value of NCI (see Requirement ‘a’) 220,000
Less: NCI's proportionate share in the net assets of subsidiary (₱720,000 acquisition-
date fair value x 25%) (180,000)
Goodwill attributable to NCI – acquisition date 40,000
Less: NCI’s share in goodwill impairment (₱32,000 x 25%) (8,000)
Goodwill attributable to NCI – current year 32,000
6. C
Solution:
Subsidiary’s net assets at fair value (see above) 1,520,000
Multiply by: NCI percentage 25%
Total 380,000
Add: Goodwill attributable to NCI (see above) 32,000
NCI in net assets – current year 412,000
7. C
Solution:
Parent's retained earnings – current year 2,000,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Parent's share in the net change in
subsidiary's net assets (a) 600,000
Parent’s share in goodwill impairment (24,000)
Net consolidation adjustments 576,000
Consolidated retained earnings 2,576,000
(a)
Net change in subsidiary’s net assets (see above) ₱800,000 x 75% = ₱600,000.
8. A
Solution:
Total assets of Parent 4,000,000
Total assets of Subsidiary 2,000,000
Investment in subsidiary (consideration transferred) (600,000)
Fair value adjustments - net -
Goodwill – net 68,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 5,468,000
9. B
Solution:
Share capital of Parent 1,200,000
Share premium of Parent -
Consolidated retained earnings 2,576,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 3,776,000
Non-controlling interests 412,000
Consolidated total equity 4,188,000
10. A
Solution:
Sales by Rooster Co. 4,000,000
Sales by Cockerel Co. 2,800,000
Less: Intercompany sales during the current period (600,000)
Consolidated sales 6,200,000
11. B
Solution:
The unrealized profit in ending inventory is computed as follows:
Sale price of intercompany sale 600,000
Cost of intercompany sale (480,000)
Profit from intercompany sale 120,000
Multiply by: Unsold portion as of yr.-end 1/4
Unrealized gross profit in ending inventory 30,000
12. D
Solution:
Rooster Cockerel Consolidated
Profits before adjustments 936,000 700,000 1,636,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Unrealized profit (Reqmt.’a’) (30,000) - (30,000)
Dividend income (given) (40,000) N/A (40,000)
Net consol. adjustments (70,000) - (70,000)
Profits before FVA 866,000 700,000 1,566,000
Depreciation of FVA - - -
Sh. in goodwill impairment(b) (24,000) (8,000) (32,000)
Consolidated profit 842,000 692,000 1,534,000
OCI 296,000 100,000 396,000
Comprehensive income 1,138,000 792,000 1,930,000
(b)
Share in goodwill impairment: (₱32,000 x 75%); (₱32,000 x 25%)
14. B
Solution:
Owners Consoli-
of parent NCI dated
Rooster's profit before FVA 866,000 N/A 866,000
(see above)
(c)
Sh. in Cockerel’s profit before FVA
Depreciation of FVA - - -
Sh. in goodwill impairment (see above) (24,000) (8,000) (32,000)
1,367,00 167,00
1,534,000
Profit attributable to 0 0
Rooster's OCI 296,000 N/A 296,000
Sh. in Cockerel’s OCI (d) 75,000 25,000 100,000
1,738,00 192,00
1,930,000
Comprehensive inc. attributable to 0 0
(c)
Share in Cockerel’s profit before FVA: (₱700,000 x 75%); (₱700,000 x 25%)
(d)
Share in Cockerel’s OCI: (₱100,000 x 75%); (₱100,000 x 25%)
16. D
Solution:
The consolidated sales and cost of sales are computed as follows:
Consolidated sales
Sales of Pig Co. 4,000,000
Sales of Piglet Co. from Sept. 1 to Dec. 31 only (₱2.88M x4/12) 960,000
Less: Intercompany sales during the year (324,000)
Consolidated sales 4,636,000
17. A
Solution:
The unrealized profit in ending inventory is computed as follows:
Sale price of intercompany sale 324,000
Cost of intercompany sale (₱324,000 ÷ 150%) (216,000)
Profit from intercompany sale 108,000
Multiply by: Unsold portion as of year-end 1/3
Unrealized gross profit 36,000
18. A
Solution:
Parent Subsidiary Consolidated
Profits before adjustments 896,000 240,000a 1,136,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Unrealized profit - (see above) ( - ) (36,000) (36,000)
Net consolidation adjustments ( - ) (36,000) (36,000)
Profits before FVA 896,000 204,000 1,100,000
Depreciation of FVA ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Consolidated profit 896,000 204,000 1,100,000
a
(₱720,000 x 4/12 = ₱240,000)
19. B
Solution:
Owners Consoli-
of parent NCI dated
Pig's profit before FVA (see
above) 896,000 N/A 896,000
Share in Piglet’s profit before FVA (c) 153,000 51,000 204,000
Depreciation of FVA ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
Share in goodwill impairment ( - ) ( - ) ( - )
1,049,00 51,00 1,100,00
Totals 0 0 0
(c)
Shares in Piglet’s profit before FVA (see above): (₱204K x 75%); (₱204K x 25%)
20. D
Solution:
Profit or loss attributable to owners of parent and NCI
Owners Consoli-
of parent NCI dated
Bear's profit before FVA (given) 936,000 N/A 936,000
163,00
489,000 652,000
Share in Cub’s profit before FVA (a) 0
Profit attributable to preference
N/A 48,000 48,000
shareholders of Cub (b)
Depreciation of FVA - - -
Share in impairment loss on goodwill - - -
1,424,96 211,00
1,636,000
Totals 0 0
(a)
The shares in Cub’s profit are computed as follows:
Profit of Cub. Co. 700,000
One-year dividends on cumulative preference sh. (400K x 12%) (48,000)(b)
Profit of Cub Co. attributable to ordinary shareholders 652,000
Allocation:
Bear's share (₱652,000 x 75%) 489,000
NCI's share (₱652,000 x 25%) 163,000
As allocated: 652,000
During 20x1, no dividends were declared by either ABC or XYZ. There were also no inter-
company transactions.
Case #1: On acquisition date, ABC Co. elected to measure non-controlling interest as its
proportionate share in XYZ, Inc.’s net identifiable assets.
1. How much is the consolidated profit for 20x1?
a. 296,000 b. 280,000 c. 208,000 d. 276,000
Case #1 Case #2
(proportionate) (fair value)
(1) Consideration transferred 300,000 300,000
(2) Non-controlling interest in the
72,000 75,000
acquiree
(3) Previously held equity interest
- -
in the acquire
Total 372,000 375,000
Fair value of net identifiable
(360,000) (360,000)
assets acquired
Goodwill 12,000 15,000
As of December 31, 20x1, XYZ, Inc. increased its net assets (after fair value adjustments)
by ₱40,000 to ₱400,000. The NCI in net assets is updated as follows:
Case #1 Case #2
(proportionate) (fair value)
NCI at acquisition date – Jan. 1, 20x1 72,000 75,000
Subsequent increase (20% x ₱40,000) 8,000 8,000
Carrying amount of NCI – Jan. 1, 20x2 80,000 83,000
7. If NCI is measured at “proportionate share,” how much is the gain or loss on the
transaction to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements?
a. 80,000 b. (80,000) c. (83,000) d. 0
8. If NCI is measured at “fair value,” how much is the gain or loss on the transaction to be
recognized in the consolidated financial statements?
a. (83,000) b. 83,000 c. (80,000) d. 0
9. If NCI is measured at “proportionate share,” what is the effect of the transaction on the
consolidated financial statements?
a. ₱80,000 decrease in NCI and ₱40,000 decrease in retained earnings of ABC Co.
b. ₱83,000 decrease in NCI and ₱37,000 decrease in retained earnings of ABC Co.
c. either a or b
d. No effect on the consolidated financial statements
10. If NCI is measured at “fair value,” what is the effect of the transaction on the
consolidated financial statements?
a. ₱80,000 decrease in NCI and ₱40,000 decrease in retained earnings of ABC Co.
b. ₱83,000 decrease in NCI and ₱37,000 decrease in retained earnings of ABC Co.
c. either a or b
d. No effect on the consolidated financial statements
11. If NCI is measured at “proportionate share,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 40,000 b. 32,000 c. 30,200 d. 38,500
12. If NCI is measured at “fair value,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 40,000 b. 32,000 c. 30,200 d. 38,500
13. If NCI is measured at “proportionate share,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 40,000 b. 32,000 c. 30,200 d. 38,500
14. If NCI is measured at “fair value,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 40,000 b. 32,000 c. 30,200 d. 38,500
On January 1, 20x2, XYZ, Inc. issues additional 10,000 shares with par value per share of
₱4 to other investors for ₱10 per share. Although none of the shares were purchased by
ABC, it was determined that the additional share issuance has no effect on ABC’s control
over XYZ.
15. If NCI is measured at “proportionate share,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 13,333 b. 11,332 c. 13,200 d. 0
16. If NCI is measured at “fair value,” what is the direct adjustment in equity?
a. 13,332 b. 11,332 c. 13,200 d. 0
On January 1, 20x2, ABC Co. sells 60% of its interest in XYZ, Inc. for ₱400,000. ABC’s
remaining 20% interest in XYZ has a fair value of ₱100,000. The remaining investment in
XYZ, Inc. gives ABC significant influence over XYZ. The statements of financial position
immediately before the sale are shown below:
Subsequent to acquisition date, XYZ, Inc. increased its net assets (after fair value
adjustments) by ₱52,000 to ₱412,000. The movement in XYZ’s net assets is shown below:
Accordingly, the accumulated OCI attributable to owners of the parent presented in the
consolidated financial statements comprises the following:
Gain on property revaluation (8,000 x 80%) 6,400
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operation (4K x 80%) 3,200
Consolidated other components of equity – Dec. 31, 20x1 9,600
On January 1, 20x2, ABC Co. sells 60% of its interest in XYZ, Inc. for ₱400,000. ABC’s
remaining 20% interest in XYZ has a fair value of ₱100,000. The remaining investment in
XYZ, Inc. does not give ABC significant influence over XYZ.
How much is the gain or loss on disposal of controlling interest to be recognized in profit or
loss?
a. 152,400 b. 156,800 c. 160,200 d. 158,400
Included in Son’s liabilities is an account payable to Dad amounting to ₱80,000. Dad elected
to measure NCI as its proportionate share in Son’s net identifiable assets.
19. How much is the total assets in Dad’s separate financial statements immediately after
the combination?
a. 6,304,000 b. 4,000,000 c. 5,000,000 d. 4,920,000
20. How much is the total assets in the consolidated financial statements?
a. 6,304,000 b. 5,904,000 c. 6,054,000 d. 5,984,000
Additional information:
Included in the total assets of Nymph is land classified as investment property with a
cost of ₱720,000. Its fair value at acquisition date was ₱800,000 and by June 30, 20x3
this had risen to ₱1,280,000. Nymph uses the cost model for its investment properties.
However, the group's policy for investment properties is the fair value model.
Also at acquisition date, Nymph's building classified as property, plant, and equipment
had a fair value of ₱120,000 in excess of its carrying amount. The building's remaining
useful life is 5 years at that date. The group's depreciation method is straight-line basis.
The inter-company current accounts included receivables and payables of ₱40,000 on
June 30, 20x3.
An impairment test at June 30, 20x3 concluded that consolidated goodwill was impaired
by ₱80,000.
Cockroach elected to measure NCI at the NCI's fair value. There have been no changes
in Nymph’s number of outstanding shares subsequent to date of acquisition.
A summary of the individual statements of financial positions of the entities as at June 30,
20x3 is shown below:
Cockroach Nymph
Co. Co.
Total assets 4,000,000 2,000,000
21. How much is the goodwill to be presented in the June 30, 20x3 consolidated financial
statements?
a. 550,000 b. 620,000 c. 485,000 d. 530,000
On January 1, 20x3, Rabbit Co. acquired additional 35% interest in Bunny Co. for ₱800,000.
On this date, the fair value of the existing holdings of Rabbit in Bunny was ₱400,000.
Bunny's net identifiable assets on January 1, 20x3, has a carrying amount of ₱720,000
which approximates fair value. Bunny’s net assets comprised of share capital amounting to
₱400,000 and retained earnings amounting to ₱320,000. Rabbit assigned a fair value of
₱220,000 to the NCI.
The group determined on Dec. 31, 20x3 that there is no impairment in goodwill. A summary
of the individual statements of financial positions of the entities as at December 31, 20x3 is
shown below:
Rabbit Co. Bunny Co.
Total assets 4,000,000 2,000,000
Total liabilities 800,000 480,000
Share capital 1,200,000 400,000
Retained earnings 2,000,000 1,120,000
Total liabilities and equity 4,000,000 2,000,000
26. How much is the goodwill to be presented in the December 31, 20x3 consolidated
financial statements?
a. 480,000 b. 700,000 c. 300,000 d. 80,000
Sheep's separate financial statements reported profit of ₱866,000 for the year ended
December 31, 20x1. Profit attributable to NCI was appropriately determined at ₱167,000.
31. How much is the profit of Lamb for the year ended December 31, 20x1?
a. 175,000 b. 625,000 c. 700,000 d. 225,000
33. How much is the profit attributable to owners of the parent and to NCI, respectively?
Parent NCI
a. 1,367,000 167,000
b. 1,391,000 167,000
c. 1,359,000 167,000
d. 1,436,000 398,000
Comprehensive problem
Use the following information for the next ten questions:
On January 1, 20x1, Peter Co. acquired 90% ownership interest in Simon Co. for ₱488,000.
Peter Co. elected to measure NCI at fair value. NCI was assigned a fair value of ₱60,000.
On January 1, 20x1, the fair values of the assets and liabilities of XYZ, Inc. were determined
by appraisal, as follows:
Carrying Fair Fair value
Simon Co.
amounts values increment
Cash 40,000 40,000 -
Accounts receivable 60,000 60,000 -
Inventory 100,000 124,000 24,000
Equipment 240,000 360,000 120,000
Accumulated
(80,000) (120,000) (40,000)
depreciation
Patent 80,000 80,000
Accounts payable (24,000) (24,000) -
Net assets 336,000 520,000 184,000
The remaining useful life of the equipment is 5 years while the patent has a remaining legal
and useful life of 8 years. Simon’s share capital has a balance of ₱200,000.
Among the transactions of Peter and Simon during 20x1 were the following:
Peter's accounts receivable include a receivable from Simon amounting to ₱12,000 while
Simon's accounts payable include a payable to Peter amounting to ₱8,000. The
difference was due to a check amounting to ₱4,000 deposited by Simon directly to
Peter's bank account which was not yet recorded by Peter in its books. The check has
already cleared in Simon’s bank account.
Peter sold goods costing ₱80,000 to Simon for ₱128,000. One-third of the inventory
remains as of Dec. 31, 20x1.
Simon sold goods costing ₱40,000 to Peter for ₱60,000. One-half of the goods remain in
inventory as of December 31, 20x1.
On January 1, 20x1, Simon sold to Peter equipment for ₱20,000. The equipment has a
historical cost of ₱40,000 and accumulated depreciation of ₱16,000 and a remaining
useful life of 5 years on the date of sale.
On July 1, 20x1, Simon Co. purchased 50% of the outstanding bonds of Peter Co. from
the open market for ₱240,000. The interest income accruing on the bonds for the year
was received by Simon from Peter.
The bonds payable carry an interest rate of 10% and were originally issued by Peter at
face amount.
Peter declared dividends of ₱160,000.
Simon declared dividends of ₱80,000.
Goodwill is impaired by ₱8,000.
There have been no changes in Simon’s share capital.
The individual financial statements of the entities at December 31, 20x1 are shown below:
37. How much is the goodwill in the December 31, 20x1 consolidated financial statements?
a. 20,000 b. 18,800 c. 22,000 d. 19,800
38. How much is the NCI in net assets as of December 31, 20x1?
a. 82,080 b. 82,720 c. 82,800 d. 82,880
39. How much is the consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 20x1?
a. 1,939,200 b. 1,979,000 c. 1,946,400 d. 1,929,200
Solutions:
1. D
Solutions:
Step 1: Analysis of effects of intercompany transaction
There are no intercompany transactions in the problem.
2. A
Solution:
Case #1
(proportionate)
Total assets of ABC Co. 1,672,000
Total assets of XYZ, Inc. 496,000
Investment in subsidiary (300,000)
FVA, net (16K - 10K) (Step 2) 24,000
Goodwill, net (Step 3) 8,000
Effect of intercompany transaction -
Consolidated total assets 1,900,000
3. C
Solution:
Case #1
(proportionate)
Share capital of ABC Co. 680,000
Share premium of ABC Co. 260,000
Consolidated retained earnings (Step 5) 468,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 1,408,000
Non-controlling interests (Step 4) 80,000
Consolidated total equity 1,488,000
4. D
Solution:
Step 1: Analysis of effects of intercompany transaction
There are no intercompany transactions in the problem.
5. C
Solution:
Case #2 (fair
value)
Total assets of ABC Co. 1,672,000
Total assets of XYZ, Inc. 496,000
Investment in subsidiary (300,000)
FVA, net (16K - 10K) (Step 2) 24,000
Goodwill, net (Step 3) 11,000
Effect of intercompany transaction -
Consolidated total assets 1,903,000
6. D
Solution:
Case #2 (fair
value)
Share capital of ABC Co. 680,000
Share premium of ABC Co. 260,000
Consolidated retained earnings (Step 5) 468,800
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 1,408,800
Non-controlling interests (Step 4) 82,200
Consolidated total equity 1,491,000
7. D None. The transaction is accounted for as equity transaction because it does not result to loss of
control.
8. D None. The transaction is accounted for as equity transaction because it does not result to loss of
control.
9. A
Solution:
Owners of Net assets of
% parent % NCI XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 320,000 20% 80,000 400,000 a
After the transaction 100% 400,000 - - 400,000
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) 80,000 (80,000) -
a
This represents the fair value of XYZ’s net assets on December 31, 20x1 (₱360,000 fair value on acquisition date +
₱40,000 increase during the year).
10. B
Solution:
Owners of Net assets of
% parent % NCI XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 332,000 20% 83,000 415,000 b
After the transaction 100% 415,000 - - 415,000
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) 83,000 (83,000) -
b
When NCI is measured at fair value, the subsidiary’s net assets is grossed up to reflect the goodwill attributable to
the NCI (₱83,000 NCI ÷ 20% = ₱415,000).
12. C
Solution:
Owners of Net assets of
% parent % NCI XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 332,000 20% 83,000 415,000*
After the transaction 92% 381,800 8% 33,200 415,000
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) 49,800 (49,800) -
*The net assets is grossed up as follows (₱20,750 NCI ÷ 20% = ₱103,750).
Case #2 (fair
value)
Fair value of consideration 80,000
Change in NCI (see table above) (49,800)
Direct adjustment to equity 30,200
13. A
Solution:
Owners of
% parent % NCI Net assets of XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 320,000 20% 80,000 400,000
After the transaction 70% 280,000 30% 120,000 400,000
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) (40,000) 40,000 -
Case #1 (proportionate)
Fair value of consideration 80,000
Change in NCI (see table above) (40,000)
Direct adjustment to equity 40,000
14. D
Solution:
Owners of
% parent % NCI Net assets of XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 332,000 20% 83,000 415,000
After the transaction 70% 290,500 30% 124,500 415,000
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) (41,500) 41,500 -
*The net assets is grossed up as follows: (₱83,000 NCI ÷ 20% = ₱415,000).
Case #2 (fair
value)
Fair value of consideration 80,000
Change in NCI (see table above) (41,500)
Direct adjustment to equity 38,500
15. A
Solution:
The change in ABC’s ownership interest in XYZ is determined as follows:
Before
issuance % After issuance %
Shares held by ABC 40,000 40,000
80% 66.67%
Outstanding shares of XYZ 50,000 60,000 a
a
(50,000 + 10,000 additional shares issued to NCI = 60,000)
16. B
Solution:
Owners of
% parent % NCI Net assets of XYZ
Before the transaction 80% 332,000 20% 83,000 415,000 c
After the transaction 66.67% 343,332 33.33% 171,668 515,000 d
Change – Inc./ (Decrease) 11,332 88,668 100,000
c
The net assets is grossed up as follows: (₱83,000 NCI ÷ 20% = ₱415,000).
d
(₱415,000 + ₱100,000 proceeds from issuance of additional shares = ₱515,000).
17. B
Solution:
Step 1: We will identify the carrying amounts of XYZ’s assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial
statements as at the date control was lost.
The consolidated retained earnings pertains to the parent only. Thus, no retained earnings is allocated to XYZ.
18. D
Solution:
Jan. 1, Cash – ABC Co. (Consideration received) 400,000
20x2 Held for trading securities (Investment retained) 100,000
Non-controlling interest 82,400
Net identifiable assets a (see given) 412,000
Goodwill 12,000
Gain on disposal (squeeze) 158,400
a
Net identifiable assets is also excess of total assets over total liabilities.
19. C
Solution:
Total assets of Dad before the combination 4,000,000
Investment in subsidiary 1,000,000
Total assets of Dad after the combination 5,000,000
20. B
Solution:
Total assets of Dad after the combination (see above) 5,000,000
Total assets of Son (carrying amount) 1,600,000
Investment in subsidiary (1,000,000)
FVA on assets (430K fair value – 400K carrying amount) 120,000
Goodwill – net [1M + (920K x 20% NCI)] – 920 264,000
Effect of intercompany transactions (intercompany receivable) (80,000)
Consolidated total assets 5,904,000
21. A
Solution:
Analysis of net assets
Nymph Co. Acquisition date Consolidation date Net change
Share capital (100,000 sh. x ₱4) 400,000 400,000
Retained earnings 320,000 1,120,000
Totals at carrying amounts 720,000 1,520,000
FVA on investment property a 80,000 560,000
FVA on building 120,000 120,000
Subsequent depreciation of FVA b NIL (48,000)
Subsidiary's net assets at fair value 920,000 2,152,000 1,232,000
a
FVA on acquisition date (₱800,000 - ₱720,000 = ₱80,000); FVA on June 30, 20x3 (₱1,280,000 - ₱720,000 = ₱560,000).
These FVA’s are not subsequently depreciated because depreciation is prohibited under the fair value model.
b
The depreciation of FVA pertains only to the building (see discussion above) (₱120,000 x 2/5 = ₱48,000).
22. D
Solution:
Nymph's net assets at fair value – 6/30/x3 (see ‘Analysis’ above) 2,152,000
Multiply by: NCI percentage 25%
Total 538,000
Add: Goodwill attributable to NCI – 6/30/x3 (see above) 100,000
Non-controlling interest in net assets – June 30, 20x3 638,000
23. A
Solution:
Cockroach's retained earnings – 6/30/x3 2,000,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Share in the net change in Nymph's net assets (a) 924,000
Cockroach's share in goodwill impairment (60,000)
Net consolidation adjustments 864,000
Consolidated retained earnings – June 30, 20x3 2,864,000
(a)
Net change in Nymph’s net assets (see ‘Analysis’) ₱1,232,000 x 75% = ₱924,000.
24. B
Solution:
Total assets of Cockroach 4,000,000
Total assets of Nymph 2,000,000
Investment in subsidiary (1,200,000)
Fair value adjustments – net (560K + 120K – 48K) see ‘Analysis’ 632,000
Goodwill – net 550,000
Effect of intercompany transactions (Intercompany receivable) (40,000)
Consolidated total assets 5,942,000
25. C
Solution:
Share capital of Cockroach 1,200,000
Share premium of Cockroach -
Consolidated retained earnings 2,864,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 4,064,000
Non-controlling interests 638,000
Consolidated total equity 4,702,000
26. B
Solution:
Analysis of net assets
Consolidation Net change
Acquisition date
Bunny Co. (Jan. 1, 20x3)
date
(Dec. 31, 20x3)
Share capital 400,000 400,000
Retained earnings 320,000 1,120,000
Totals at carrying amounts 720,000 1,520,000
Fair value adjustments - -
Subsequent depreciation of FVA NIL ( - )
Subsidiary's net assets at fair value 720,000 1,520,000 800,000
27. D
Solution:
Bunny's net assets at fair value – 12/31/x3 (see ‘Analysis’ above) 1,520,000
Multiply by: NCI percentage 25%
Total 380,000
Add: Goodwill attributable to NCI – 6/30/x3 (see above) 40,000
Non-controlling interest in net assets – Dec. 31, 20x3 420,000
28. A
Solution:
Rabbit's retained earnings – 12/31/x3 2,000,000
Consolidation adjustments:
Rabbit’s share in the net change in Bunny's net assets (a) 600,000
Rabbit's share in goodwill impairment ( - )
Net consolidation adjustments 600,000
Consolidated retained earnings – Dec. 31, 20x3 2,600,000
(a)
Net change in Bunny’s net assets (see ‘Analysis’) ₱800,000 x 75% = ₱600,000.
29. B
Solution:
Total assets of Rabbit 4,000,000
Total assets of Bunny 2,000,000
Investment in subsidiary (₱800,000 + ₱400,000) (1,200,000)
Fair value adjustments – net -
Goodwill – net 700,000
Effect of intercompany transactions -
Consolidated total assets 5,500,000
30. D
Solution:
Share capital of Rabbit 1,200,000
Share premium of Rabbit -
Consolidated retained earnings 2,600,000
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 3,800,000
Non-controlling interest 420,000
Consolidated total equity 4,220,000
31. C
Solution:
Owners
of parent NCI
Sheep's profit before FVA 866,000 N/A
Share in Lamb’s profit before FVA 525,000 b 175,00 squeeze
0
Depreciation of FVA ( - ) ( - )
Share in impairment of goodwill (24,000) (8,000) a
1,367,00
Totals 0 167,000 start
a
Shares in impairment of goodwill: (₱8,000 x 75%); (₱8,000 x 25%)
b
(₱175,000 ÷ 25%) = ₱700,000 Lamb’s separate profit x 75% = ₱525,000.
i. In-transit item
The ₱4,000 check deposited to Peter’s account is a valid payment for Simon’s account. Therefore,
Simon’s ₱8,000 account payable to Peter need not be adjusted.
However, since Peter failed to record the payment, Peter’s ₱12,000 accounts receivable from Simon must
be adjusted. As to Peter, the deposit is a bank credit memo.
Unlike CJE’s, AJE’s are recorded in the separate books. The remaining balance of ₱8,000 in the
intercompany account receivable/account payable shall be eliminated through CJE.
Before we can compute for the consolidated cost of sales, we need to determine first the depreciation of
FVA in 20x1.
FVA on inventory 24,000
FVA on equipment, net (20,000 ÷ 5 years) 16,000
FVA on patent (20,000 ÷ 8 years) 10,000
Depreciation of FVA in 20x1 50,000
The ₱4,000 loss on sale recognized by Simon shall be eliminated in the consolidated statement of profit
or loss.
Peter’s ₱72,000 dividend income shall be eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
No consolidation adjustment is needed for the dividends declared by Peter because the dividends pertain
solely to the owners of the parent.
The unrealized profit on upstream sale on inventory, unamortized deferred loss on upstream sale of
equipment and interest income on investment in bonds were closed to Simon’s retained earnings by year-
end. These are eliminated through addition or subtraction, as appropriate.
The deferred loss on the sale of equipment is not included in the computations above because the sale is
upstream.
Peter Group
Statement of profit or loss
For the year ended December 31, 20x1
Sales (Step 1.ii) 4,560,000
Cost of goods sold (Step 1.ii) (2,034,000)
Gross profit 2,526,000
Interest income (eliminated - Step 1.iv) -
Distribution costs (400,000)
Depreciation expense (Step 1.iii) (688,000)
Loss on sale of equipment (eliminated - Step 1.iv) -
Interest expense (10,000 - 2,500 Step 1.iv) (30,000)
Dividend income (eliminated - Step 1.v) -
Amortization expense on patent (Step 1.iii) (10,000)
Loss on extinguishment of bonds (Step 1.iv) (40,000)
Impairment loss on goodwill (Step 3) (8,000)
Profit for the year 1,350,000