Student Performance
Student Performance
The Mean, Median, and Mode of Students’ Grade in First Grading, Second Grading, and Third
Grading.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their grades. The result of the mean, median,
and mode of students’ grade in first grading, second grading, and third grading is presented in the
table below.
Table 1. The Mean, Median, and Mode of Students’ Grades in First Grading, Second
Grading and Third Grading
Grades Mean Median Mode Description
First Grading 84.12 85 80 and 89 Approaching
Proficiency
Second 84 84 82, 87, 89 Approaching
Grading Proficiency
Third Grading 84.88 85 85 Approaching
Proficiency
Overall 84.33 84.67 80, 82, 87, 85 Approaching
and 89 Proficiency
Interpretation Table
BEGINNING DEVELOPING APPROACHING PROFICIENT ADVANCE
(B: 74% and below) (D: 75%-79%) PROFICIENCY (P:85%-89%) (A:90% and
(AP:80%-84%) above)
Computation (Ungrouped Data)
x=84.12
∑x ~
x= x=¿ 84 Multimodal: 82, 87, and 89
n
2100
x=
25
x=84
Presented above is the Table 1 Measures of Central Tendency, Ungrouped Data. The
table shows the Science students’ quarterly grades in the first, second, and third quarter. All in all,
there are 25 students showing their overall grades in the first to third quarter. Shown in the Table
1 Measure of Central Tendency, Ungrouped Data are the mean, median, and mode in all quarters.
The mean value from the students’ grades in 1st quarter is 84.12, which represents their average
score within that quarter having the middle value of 85 and the most frequent score of 80 and 89.
In their 2nd quarter grade, there is an 84 mean value as it represents the average score within that
quarter also having the middle value of 84 and the frequent grade of 82, 87 and 89. On the other
hand, the 3rd quarter mean score of students’ grade is 84.88, which also represents the average
score of that certain quarter having the middle value of 85 and the most frequent score of 85.
The results clearly show that if we compare these three means of each quarter grade, it
appears that the most performing quarter of the students is 3rd quarter which has a mean score of
84.88. This implies that students in the said quarter they excel or developed the knowledge and
skills and core understanding with a little guidance of a teacher compared to their 1 st and 2nd
quarter grade. If the student's grades are below 84.88 therefore they belong to the lower 50% of
the class but if the students scored are above 84.88, therefore they belong to the upper 50% of the
class. Within that measured central tendency, the most frequent grade is 85. Given that the 3rd
quarter students’ grades are greater than to the 1st quarter and 2 nd quarter grades, the teacher
probably had an additional learning materials which he/she did not apply in the 1 st and 2nd
quarter. It is also possible that the teacher employed other learning strategies for the students to
The Mean, Median, and Mode of Students’ Quarterly Exam Results in First Grading, Second
Grading, and Third Grading.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on the results in their examination. The result of
the mean, median, and mode of students’ grade in first grading, second grading, and third grading
Table 2. Mean, Median, and Mode of Students’ Exam Results in First, Second, and Third
Quarter
Grades Mean Median Mode Description
First Grading 80.36 72.62 77.15 Approaching
Proficiency
Second 76 75.67 78.72 Developing
Grading
Third Grading 81 81.43 80.5 Approaching
Proficiency
Interpretation Table
BEGINNING DEVELOPING APPROACHING PROFICIENT ADVANCE
(B: 74% and below) (D: 75%-79%) PROFICIENCY (P:85%-89%) (A:90% and
(AP:80%-84%) above)
Mean: x=
∑ fx
n
CI f x fx
60-66 2 63 126
67-73 1 70 70
74-80 13 77 1001
81-87 2 84 168
88-94 6 91 546
95-101 1 98 98
n = 25 ∑ fx=2009
Given: n=25 , ∑ fx=2009
x=
∑ fx = 2009 =80.36
n 25
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Median: 2
Md=¿cb + i
f
CI f CB <cf
60-66 2 59.5-66.5 2
67-73 1 66.5-73.5 3
74-80 13 73.5-80.5 16 Middle class
81-87 2 80.5-87.5 18
88-94 6 87.5-94.5 24
95-101 1 94.5-100.5 25
n = 25
n 25
Given: = =12.5 ,¿ cb=73. 5 , ¿ cf b=3 , f =13 , i=7
2 2
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Md=¿cb +
2
f
i=73.5+
12.5−3
13
7=73.5+
9.5
13 ( ) ( )
7=73.5+ ( 0.73076923 ) 7=73.5+5.115384615=78
Mode: Mo=¿cb + ( d1
d 1 +d 2
i
)
CI f CB
60-66 2 59.5-66.5
67-73 1 66.5-73.5
74-80 13 73.5-80.5 Middle class
81-87 2 80.5-87.5
88-94 6 87.5-94.5
95-101 1 94.5-100.5
n = 25
Mo=¿cb +
( d1
d 1 +d 2)i=73.5+
12
12+11 (
7=73.5+
12
23 ) ( )
7=73.5+ ( 0.52173913 ) 7=73.5+3.652173913=77.152
2nd Grading
Mean: x=
∑ fx
n
CI f x fx
64-68 3 66 198
69-73 3 71 213
74-78 15 76 1140
79-83 0 81 0
84-88 3 86 258
89-93 1 91 91
n = 25 ∑ fx =1900
Given: n=25 , ∑ fx=1900
x=
∑ fx = 1900 =76
n 25
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Median: 2
Md=¿cb + i
f
CI f CB <cf
64-68 3 63.5-68.5 3
69-73 3 68.5-73.5 6
74-78 15 73.5-78.5 21 Middle class
79-83 0 78.5-83.5 21
84-88 3 83.5-88.5 24
89-93 1 88.5-92.5 25
n = 25
n 25
Given: = =12.5 ,¿ cb=73. 5 , ¿ cf b=6 , f =15 , i=5
2 2
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Md=¿cb +
2
f
i=73.5+
12.5−6
15
5=73.5+ (
6.5
3 ) ( )
=73.5+ 2.166666667=75.66666667 ≈ 75.67
Mode: Mo=¿cb + (
d1
d 1 +d 2
i )
CI f CB
64-68 3 63.5-68.5
69-73 3 68.5-73.5
74-78 15 73.5-78.5 Middle class
79-83 0 78.5-83.5
84-88 3 83.5-88.5
89-93 1 88.5-92.5
n = 25
Mo=¿cb +
( d1
d 1 +d 2)i=73.5+
12
12+15 (
5=73.5+
12
27 ) ( )
5=73.5+ ( 0.444444444 ) 5=73.5+2.222222222=75.72
3rd Grading
Mean: x=
∑ fx
n
CI f x fx
63-67 2 65 130
68-72 1 70 70
73-77 4 75 300
78-82 7 80 560
83-87 5 85 425
88-92 6 90 540
n = 25 ∑ fx=¿ 2025¿
Given: n=25 , ∑ fx=2025
x=
∑ fx = 2025 =81
n 25
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Median: 2
Md=¿cb + i
f
CI f CB <cf
63-67 2 62.5-67.5 2
68-72 1 67.5-72.5 3
73-77 4 72.5-77.5 7
78-82 7 77.5-82.5 14 Middle class
83-87 5 82.5-87.5 19
88-92 6 87.5-92.5 25
n = 25
n 25
Given: = =12.5 ,¿ cb=77.5 , ¿ cf b =7 , f =7 , i=5
2 2
( )
n
−¿ cf b
Md=¿cb +
2
f
i=77.5+
12.5−7
7
5=77.5+ (
5.5
7 ) ( )
5=77.5+ ( 0.785714285 ) 5=77.5+ 3.928571429=8
Mode: Mo=¿cb +
( d1
d 1 +d 2
i
)
CI f CB
63-67 2 62.5-67.5
68-72 1 67.5-72.5
73-77 4 72.5-77.5
78-82 7 77.5-82.5 Middle class
83-87 5 82.5-87.5
88-92 6 87.5-92.5
n = 25
Mo=¿cb + ( d1
d 1 +d 2)i=77.5+
3
3+2 ( )
5=77.5+
3
5 ()
5=77.5+ 3=80.5
Shown above is the Table 2 Measures of Central Tendency of Grouped Data. The table
shows the Science students’ quarterly exam in the first, second, and third quarter. All in all, there
are 25 students showing their overall exam in the first to third quarter. Presented in the Table 1
Measure of Central Tendency of Grouped Data are the mean, median, and mode in all quarters.
The mean value from the students’ exam in 1st quarter is 80.36, which represents their average
score within that quarter having the middle value of 78.62 and the most frequent score is 77.15.
In their 2nd quarter exam the mean value is 78 as it represents the average score within that
quarter also having the middle value of 75.67 and the frequent grade is 78.72. On the other hand,
the 3rd quarter mean score of students’ exam is 81, which also represents the average score of
that certain quarter having the middle value of 81.43 and the most frequent score of 80.5.
The results clearly show that if we compare these three means of each quarter exam, it
appears that the students most performing quarter is 3rd quarter which has a mean score of 81.
This implies that students in the said quarter they developed the knowledge and skills and core
understanding with a little guidance of a teacher compared to their 1 st and 2nd quarter grade. If
the student's grades are below 81 therefore they belong to the lower 50% of the class but if the
students scored are above 81, therefore they belong to the upper 50% of the class. Within that
measured central tendency, the most frequent grade is 80.5. Given that the 3rd quarter students’
exam is greater than to the 1st quarter and 2 nd quarter exam, the teacher probably had an
additional learning materials which he/she did not apply in the 1 st and 2nd quarter. It is also
possible that the teacher employed other learning strategies for the students to grasp the learning
itself.
The Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Grading
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their grades. The result of the Q1, Q2, Q3,
D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Grading is presented in the table
below.
Table 3. Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third
Quarter
Grades Q1 Q2 Q3 D2.5 P25
First Quarter 80 85 89 80 80
Second Quarter 80 80 85 80 80
Third Quarter 80 85 88 80 80
Computation (Ungrouped Data)
1st Grading
Quartile 1
72 75 75 75 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 83 85 85 87 88 89 89 89 89 90 90 91 95 95
kn
Qk =
4
1(25)
Qk =
4
25
Qk=
4
Qk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, Q 1=80
Quartile 2
72 75 75 75 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 83 85 85 87 88 89 89 89 89 90 90 91 95 95
kn
Qk =
4
2(25)
Qk =
4
50
Qk =
4
Qk =12.5≈ 13
Therefore, Q 2=¿ 85
Quartile 3
72 75 75 75 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 83 85 85 87 88 89 89 89 89 90 90 91 95 95
kn
Qk =
4
3(25)
Qk =
4
75
Qk =
4
Qk =18.75≈ 19
Therefore, Q 3=¿ 89
Decile 2.5
72 75 75 75 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 83 85 85 87 88 89 89 89 89 90 90 91 95 95
kn
Dk =
10
2.5(25)
Dk =
10
62.5
Dk =
10
Dk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, D2.5 =¿80
Percentile 25
72 75 75 75 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 83 85 85 87 88 89 89 89 89 90 90 91 95 95
kn
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
625
Pk =
100
Pk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, P25 =¿ 80
2nd Grading
Quartile 1
72 74 75 78 80 80 81 82 82 82 83 83 84 84 85 87 87 87 89 89 89 90 90 93 94
kn
Qk Qk =
4
1(25)
Qk =
4
25
Qk=
4
Qk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, Q 1=80
Quartile 2
72 74 75 78 80 80 81 82 82 82 83 83 84 84 85 87 87 87 89 89 89 90 90 93 94
kn
Qk =
4
2(25)
Qk =
4
50
Qk =
4
Qk =12.5≈ 13
Therefore, Q 2=¿ 80
Quartile 3
72 74 75 78 80 80 81 82 82 82 83 83 84 84 85 87 87 87 89 89 89 90 90 93 94
kn
Qk =
4
3(25)
Qk =
4
75
Qk =
4
Qk =18.75≈ 19
Therefore, Q 3=¿ 85
Decile 2.5
72 74 75 78 80 80 81 82 82 82 83 83 84 84 85 87 87 87 89 89 89 90 90 93 94
kn
Dk =
10
2.5(25)
Dk =
10
62.5
Dk =
10
Dk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, Dk =80
Percentile 25
72 74 75 78 80 80 81 82 82 82 83 83 84 84 85 87 87 87 89 89 89 90 90 93 94
kn
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
625
Pk =
100
Pk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, P25 =¿ 80
3rd Grading
Quartile 1
75 77 77 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 84 85 85 85 85 87 88 88 88 89 90 92 92 93 93
kn
Qk =
4
1 ( 25 )
Qk =
4
25
Qk=
4
Q k =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, Q 1=¿ 80
Quartile 2
75 77 77 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 84 85 85 85 85 87 88 88 88 89 90 92 92 93 93
kn
Qk =
4
2 ( 25 )
Qk =
4
50
Qk =
4
Qk =12.5≈ 13
Therefore, Q 1=¿ 85
Quartile 3
75 77 77 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 84 85 85 85 85 87 88 88 88 89 90 92 92 93 93
kn
Qk =
4
3 ( 25 )
Qk =
4
75
Qk =
4
Qk =18.75≈ 19
Therefore, Q 3=¿ 88
Decile 2.5
75 77 77 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 84 85 85 85 85 87 88 88 88 89 90 92 92 93 93
kn
Dk =
10
2.5(25)
Dk =
10
62.5
Dk =
10
Dk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, D2.5 =¿80
Percentile 25
75 77 77 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 84 85 85 85 85 87 88 88 88 89 90 92 92 93 93
kn
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
25( 25)
Pk =
100
625
Pk =
100
Pk =6.25≈ 6
Therefore, P25 =¿ 80
Presented above is the Table 3 Measures of Position, Ungrouped Data. The table shows
the Science students’ quarterly grades in their certain value which sample distribution falls. All in
all, there are 25 students showing their overall grades in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quarter. Presented
in the Table 3 Measures of Position, Ungrouped Data are the Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25 of
students’ grades in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd quarter. The result shows that the quarter 1 in the student’s
1st quarter grades is 80, if the grades of the students is less than 80 therefore they belong to the
lower 25% of the class but once the grades of the students is greater than 80 therefore they belong
to the upper 75% of the class. In quartile 2, if the grade of the student in 1st quarter is less than 85
therefore they belong to the lower 50% of the class but once the grades of the students in 1st
quarter is greater than 85 therefore they belong to the upper 50% of the class. Moreover, in the
3rd quartile, if the grades of the students in 1st quarter is less than 89 therefore they belong to the
lower 75% of the class but once their grades are greater than 89 therefore they belong to the upper
25% of the class. The decile 2.5, on the other hand, tells that if the grades of the students in 1st
quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 2.5% of the class but once their grades
in 1st quarter is greater than 80 therefore they belong to the upper 97.5% of the class. While, in
the Percentile of 25, it tells that if the grades of the students in 1st quarter is less than 80 therefore
they belong to the lower 25% of the class but once their grades in 1st quarter is greater than 80
therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In the second quarter, the results are being
computed in the quartile, decile and percentile. In quartile 1, the results show that if the student's
grade in 2nd quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of the class but once
their grades is greater than 80 therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In the 2nd
quartile, if the student's grade in 2nd quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower
50% of the class but once their grades in 2nd quarter is greater than 80 therefore they belong to
the upper 50% of the class, and in quartile 3, if the student's grades in 2nd quarter is less than 85
therefore they belong to the lower 75% of the class but once their grades is greater than 85
therefore they belong to the upper 25% of the class. Furthermore, the decile 2.5 also showed that
if the grades of the student in 2nd quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 2.5%
of the class but once their grades is greater than 80 therefore they belong to the upper 97.5% of
the class. Percentile 25, also shows the results that if the grades of the student in 2nd quarter is
less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of the class but once their grades is greater
than 80 therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In the 3rd quarter of the students’
grades, positions in quartile, decile, and percentile were also computed. Quartile 1 tells that if the
grades of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of the
class but once their grades is greater than 80 therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class.
While the 2nd quartile shows that if the grades of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 85
therefore they belong to the lower 50% of the class but once their grades are greater than 85
therefore they belong to the 50% upper class, and in the quartile 3 also tells that if the grades of
the students in 3rd quarter is less than 88 therefore they belong to the lower 75% of the class but
once their grades are greater than 88 therefore they belong to the upper 25% of the class. Decile
2.5, on the other hand, shows that if the grades of the student in 3rd quarter is less than 80
therefore they belong to the lower 2.5% of the class but once their grades is greater than 80
therefore they belong to the upper 97.5% of the class. Lastly, in the Percentile of 25, it shows if
the grades of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 80 therefore they belong to the lower 25%of
the class but once their grades are greater than 80 therefore they belong to the 75% upper class.
The Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Exam Results in First, Second, and Third Quarter.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their exam results. The result of the Q1, Q2,
Q3, D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Exam in First, Second, and Third Grading is presented in the
table below.
Table 4. Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25 of Students’ Exam Results in First, Second, and Third
Quarter
Grades Q1 Q2 Q3 D2.5 P25
First Quarter 75.25 78.62 88.38 75.25 75.25
Second Quarter 73.58 75.67 77.75 73.58 73.58
Third Quarter 76.56 81.43 87.25 76.56 76.56
Computation (Grouped Data)
Measure of Position (Q1, P25, D2.5, Q2, Q3)
1st Grading
Since Q1, P25, and D2.5 are equal therefore, we will just solve the Q1.
1. Find Q1, P25, D2.5, Q2, Q3
a. Q1, P25, D2.5
kn 1 ( 25 ) 25
Given: = = =6.25
i 4 4
kn
=6.25 , cf =3 , L Lqk =73.5 , f qk =13 ,i=7
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q1=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q1=73.5+( 6.25−3
13 )
7
Q =73.5+ (
13 )
3.25
1 7
Q1=73.5+ ( 0.25 ) 7
Q1=73.5+1.75
Q1=75.25
b. Q2
kn 2 ( 25 ) 50
Given: = = =12.5
i 4 4
kn
=12.5 , cf =3 , L Lqk =73.5 , f qk =13 , i=7
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q2=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q2=73.5+ ( 12.5−3
13 )
7
Q =73.5+ (
13 )
9.5
2 7
Q2=73.5+ ( 0.73076923 ) 7
Q2=73.5+5.115384615
Q2=78.61538462
Q2 ≈78.62
c. Q3
kn 3 ( 25 ) 75
Given: = = =18.75
i 4 4
kn
=18.75 , cf =18 , L Lqk =87.5 , f qk =6 ,i=7
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q3=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q3=87.5+ ( 18.75−18
6 )7
Q =87.5+ (
6 )
0.75
3 7
Q3=87.5+ ( 0.125 ) 7
Q3=87.5+ 0.875
Q 3=88.375
Q3 ≈88.38
2nd Grading
CI f Lower Class Boundary cf<
64-68 3 63.5 3
69-73 3 68.5 6
74-78 15 73.5 21
79-83 0 78.5 21
84-88 3 83.5 24
89-93 1 88.5 25
n = 25
Since Q1, P25, and D2.5 are equal therefore, we will just solve the Q1.
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q1=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q1=73.5+ ( 6.25−6
15 )
5
Q =73.5+ (
15 )
0.25
1 5
Q =73.5+ (
3 )
0.25
1
Q1=73.5+ 0.083333333
Q1=73.58333333
Q1 ≈73.58
b. Q2
kn 2 ( 25 ) 50
Given: = = =12.5
i 4 4
kn
=12.5 , cf =6 , L Lqk =73.5 , f qk =15 ,i=5
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q2=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q2=73.5+( 12.5−6
15 )
5
Q =73.5+ (
15 )
6.5
2 5
Q =73.5+ (
3 )
6.5
2
Q2=73.5+2.16666667
Q2=75.6666667
Q2 ≈75.67
c. Q3
kn 3 ( 25 ) 75
Given: = = =18.75
i 4 4
kn
=18.75 , cf =6 , L Lqk =73.5 , f qk =15 ,i=5
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q3=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q3=73.5+ ( 18.75−6
15 )
5
Q =73.5+ (
15 )
12.75
3 5
Q =73.5+ (
3 )
12.75
3
Q3=73.5+ 4.25
Q3=77.75
3rd Grading
CI f Lower Class Boundary cf<
63-67 2 62.5 2
68-72 1 67.5 3
73-77 4 72.5 7
78-82 7 77.5 14
83-87 5 82.5 19
88-92 6 87.5 25
n = 25
Since Q1, P25, and D2.5 are equal therefore, we will just solve the Q1.
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q1=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q1=72.5+ ( 6.25−3
4 )5
Q =72.5+ (
4 )
3.25
1 5
Q1=72.5+ ( 0.8125 ) 5
Q1=72.5+ 4.0625
Q1=76.5625
Q1 ≈76.56
b. Q2
kn 2 ( 25 ) 50
Given: = = =12.5
i 4 4
kn
=12.5 , cf =7 , L Lqk =77.5 , f qk =7 ,i=5
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q2=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q2=77.5+ ( 12.5−7
7 )5
Q =77.5+ (
7 )
5.5
2 5
Q2=77.5+ ( 0.785714285 ) 5
Q2=77.5+3.928571429
Q2=81.42857143
Q2 ≈ 81.43
c. Q3
kn 3 ( 25 ) 75
Given: = = =18.75
i 4 4
kn
=18.75 , cf =14 , L Lqk =82.5 , f qk =5 , i=5
4
( )
kn
−c f qk
4
Q3=L Lqk + i
f qk
Q3=82.5+ ( 18.75−14
5 )5
Q =82.5+ (
5 )
4.75
3 5
Q3=82.5+ ( 4.75 )
Q3=87.25
Presented above is the Table 4 Measures of Position, Grouped Data. The table shows the
Science students’ quarterly exam results in their certain value which sample distribution falls. All
in all, there are 25 students showing their overall exam result in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quarter.
Presented in the Table 4 Measures of Position, Grouped Data are the Q1, Q2, Q3, D2.5, and P25
of students’ grades in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd quarter. The result shows that the quarter 1 in the student’s
1st quarter exam result is 75.25, if the exam result of the students is less than 75.25 therefore they
belong to the lower 25% of the class but once the grades of the students is greater than 75.25
therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In quartile 2, if the exam result of the student
in 1st quarter is less than 78.62 therefore they belong to the lower 50% of the class but once the
exam result of the students in 1st quarter is greater than 78.62 therefore they belong to the upper
50% of the class. Moreover, in the 3rd quartile, if the exam result of the students in 1st quarter is
less than 88.38 therefore they belong to the lower 75% of the class but once their exam result is
greater than 88.38 therefore they belong to the upper 25% of the class. The decile 2.5, on the
other hand, tells that if the grades of the students in 1st quarter is less than 75.25 therefore they
belong to the lower 2.5% of the class but once their exam result in 1st quarter is greater than
75.25 therefore they belong to the upper 97.5% of the class. While, in the Percentile of 25, it tells
that if the exam result of the students in 1st quarter is less than 75.25 therefore they belong to the
lower 25% of the class but once their exam result in 1st quarter is greater than 75.25 therefore
they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In the second quarter, the results are being computed in
the quartile, decile and percentile. In quartile 1, the results show that if the student's exam result
in 2nd quarter is less than 73.58 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of the class but once their
exam result is greater than 73.58 therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. In the 2nd
quartile, if the student's exam result in 2nd quarter is less than 75.67 therefore they belong to the
lower 50% of the class but once their grades in 2nd quarter is greater than 80 therefore they
belong to the upper 50% of the class, and in quartile 3, if the student's exam result in 2nd quarter
is less than 77.75 therefore they belong to the lower 75% of the class but once their exam result is
greater than 77.75 therefore they belong to the upper 25% of the class. Furthermore, the decile 2.5
also showed that if the exam result of the student in 2nd quarter is less than 73.58 therefore they
belong to the lower 2.5% of the class but once their exam result is greater than 73.58 therefore
they belong to the upper 97.5% of the class. Percentile 25, also shows the results that if the exam
result of the student in 2nd quarter is less than 73.58 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of
the class but once their exam result is greater than 73.58 therefore they belong to the upper 75%
of the class. In the 3rd quarter of the students’ exam result, positions in quartile, decile, and
percentile were also computed. Quartile 1 tells that if the exam result of the students in 3rd
quarter is less than 76.56 therefore they belong to the lower 25% of the class but once their exam
result is greater than 76.56 therefore they belong to the upper 75% of the class. While the 2nd
quartile shows that if the exam result of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 81.43 therefore
they belong to the lower 50% of the class but once their exam result are greater than 81.43
therefore they belong to the 50% upper class, and in the quartile 3 also tells that if the exam result
of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 87.25 therefore they belong to the lower 75% of the
class but once their exam result are greater than 88 therefore they belong to the upper 25% of the
class. Decile 2.5, on the other hand, shows that if the exam result of the student in 3rd quarter is
less than 76.56 therefore they belong to the lower 2.5% of the class but once their exam result is
greater than 76.56 therefore they belong to the upper 97.5% of the class. Lastly, in the Percentile
of 25, it shows if the exam result of the students in 3rd quarter is less than 76.56 therefore they
belong to the lower 25%of the class but once their grades are greater than 76.56 therefore they
The Range, Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and
Population), and Variance of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Quarter.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their grades. The result of the Range,
Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and Population), and
Variance of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Quarter of Students’ Grades in First,
Table 5. Range, Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and
Population), and Variance of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Quarter
Quarter First Second Third
Range 23 21 18
Mean/Average Deviation 5.52 4.48 4.13
Interquartile 9 5 8
Standard Deviation Sample 6.40 5.67 5.19
Population 6.28 5.56 5.09
Variance Sample 41.02 32.17 26.94
Population 39.38 30.88 25.86
Measures of Variability
1st Grading
Range
R= High Value (HV) – Lowest Value (LV)
R= 95-72
R= 23
Mean/Average Deviation
x x−x |x−x|
72 -12.12 12.12
75 -9.12 9.12
75 -9.12 9.12
75 -9.12 9.12
79 -5.12 5.12
80 -4.12 4.12
80 -4.12 4.12
80 -4.12 4.12
80 -4.12 4.12
81 -3.12 3.12
81 -3.12 3.12
83 -1.12 1.12
85 0.88 0.88
85 0.88 0.88
87 3.88 3.88
88 3.88 3.88
89 4.88 4.88
89 4.88 4.88
89 4.88 4.88
89 4.88 4.88
90 5.88 5.88
90 5.88 5.88
91 6.88 6.88
95 10.88 10.88
95 10.88 10.88
∑|x−x|= 137. 88
x=84.12
∑|x−x|
AD=
n
137.88
AD=
25
AD=5.52
Interquartile
IOR=Q3 −Q1
IOR=89−80
IOR=9
72 -12.12 146.89
75 -9.12 83.17
75 -9.12 83.17
75 -9.12 83.17
79 -5.12 26.21
80 -4.12 16.97
80 -4.12 16.97
80 -4.12 16.97
80 -4.12 16.97
81 -3.12 9.73
81 -3.12 9.73
83 -1.12 1.25
85 0.88 0.77
85 0.88 0.77
87 2.88 8.29
88 3.88 15.05
89 4.88 23.81
89 4.88 23.81
89 4.88 23.81
89 4.88 23.81
90 5.88 34.57
90 5.88 34.57
91 6.88 47.33
95 10.88 118.37
95 10.88 118.37
2
∑|x−x| =¿ 984.53
Sample
2
∑|x−x|
2
s=
n−1
984.53
s2=
25−1
2 984.53
s=
24
2
s =41.02
√ s = n−1
2 √ ∑|x−x|
2
√ s 2= √ 984.53
24
√ s =√ 41.02
2
s=6.40
Population
2
2 ∑| x−μ|
σ =
N
2 984.53
σ =
25
2
σ =39.38
√σ = N
2 √ ∑|x−μ|
2
√ σ 2= √ 984.53
25
√ σ 2= √39.38
σ =6.28
2nd Grading
Range
R= HV-LV
R= 93-72
R= 21
Mean/Average Deviation
x x−x |x−x|
72 -12 12
74 -10 10
75 -9 9
78 -6 6
80 -4 4
80 -4 4
81 -3 3
82 -2 2
82 -2 2
82 -2 2
83 -1 1
83 -1 1
84 0 0
84 0 0
85 1 1
87 3 3
87 3 3
87 3 3
89 5 5
89 5 5
89 5 5
90 6 6
90 6 6
93 9 9
94 10 10
n=25 ∑|x−x|=¿112
x=84
∑|x−x|
AD=
n
112
AD=
25
AD=4.48
Interquartile
IOR=Q3 −Q1
IOR=85−80
IOR=5
Variance and Standard Deviation
x |x−x| |x−x|
2
72 12 144
74 10 100
75 9 81
78 6 36
80 4 16
80 4 16
81 3 9
82 2 4
82 2 4
82 2 4
83 1 1
83 1 1
84 0 0
84 0 0
85 1 1
87 3 9
87 3 9
87 3 9
89 5 25
89 5 25
89 5 25
90 6 36
90 6 36
93 9 81
94 10 100
n=25 2
∑|x−x| =772
Sample
2
2 ∑|x−x|
s=
n−1
2 772
s=
25−1
2 772
s=
24
2
s =32.17
√
√ s = n−1
2 ∑|x−x|
2
√ s 2= √24772
√ s 2=√ 32.17
s=5.67
Population
2
2∑| x−μ|
σ =
N
2 772
σ =
25
2
σ =30.88
√σ = N
2 √ ∑|x−μ|
2
√ σ 2= √25
772
√ σ 2= √30.88
σ =5.56
3rd Grading
Range
R= HV-LV
R= 93-75
R= 18
Mean/Average Deviation
x x−x |x−x|
75 -9.88 9.88
77 -7.88 7.88
77 -7.88 7.88
79 -5.88 5.88
80 -4.88 4.88
80 -4.88 4.88
80 -4.88 4.88
83 -1.88 1.88
83 -1.88 1.88
84 -0.88 0.88
84 -0.88 0.88
85 0.12 0.12
85 0.12 0.12
85 0.12 0.12
85 0.12 0.12
87 2.12 2.12
88 3.12 3.12
88 3.12 3.12
88 3.12 3.12
89 4.12 4.12
90 5.12 5.12
92 7.12 7.12
92 7.12 7.12
93 8.12 8.12
93 8.12 8.12
n= 25 ∑|x−x|=¿ 103.36
x=84.88
∑|x−x|
AD=
n
103.36
AD=
25
AD=4.13
Interquartile
IOR=Q3 −Q1
IOR=88−80
IOR=8
Variance and Standard Deviation
x |x−x| |x−x|
2
75 9.88 97.61
77 7.88 62.09
77 7.88 62.09
79 5.88 34.57
80 4.88 23.81
80 4.88 23.81
80 4.88 23.81
83 1.88 3.53
83 1.88 3.53
84 0.88 0.77
84 0.88 0.77
85 0.12 0.01
85 0.12 0.01
85 0.12 0.01
85 0.12 0.01
87 2.12 4.49
88 3.12 9.73
88 3.12 9.73
88 3.12 9.73
89 4.12 16.97
90 5.12 26.21
92 7.12 50.69
92 7.12 50.69
93 8.12 65.93
93 8.12 65.93
n= 25 ∑|x−x|=¿ 103.36 2
∑|x−x| =¿ 646.53
Sample
2
2 ∑|x−x|
s=
n−1
2 646.53
s=
25−1
2 646.53
s=
24
2
s =26.94
√ s = n−1
2 √ ∑|x−x|
2
√ s 2= √ 646.53
24
√ √
s
2
= 26.94
s=5.19
Population
2
2 ∑| x−μ|
σ =
N
2 646.53
σ =
25
2
σ =25.86
√σ = N
2 √ ∑|x−μ|
2
√ σ 2= √ 646.53
25
√ √
σ
2
= 25.86
σ =5.09
table shows the Science students’ quarterly grades in the first, second, and third quarter. All in all,
there are 25 students showing their overall grades in the first to third quarter. Presented in the
Table 5 Measure of Variation/Variability, Ungrouped Data are the range, average deviation,
interquartile range, standard deviation (sample and population), and variance. Within the 1st
Quarter, the dispersion of the Science class grades is 23 using the range, the mean/average
deviation is 5.52 while, the computed difference from the 3rd quartile and 1st quartile in the
interquartile range is 9, 41.02 using the sample variance with the standard deviation of 6.40, and
39.38 using the population variance with the standard deviation of 6.28. In the 2nd quarter, the
results show that there is a 21 length of distribution using the range, 4.48 using the mean/average
deviation while, the computed difference from the 3rd quartile and 1st quartile in the interquartile
range is 5 whereas, 32.17 sample variance with a 5.67 sample standard deviation, and 30.88 using
the population variance with the population standard deviation of 5.56. However, the results in
3rd quarter shows that there is an 18 computed dispersion using the range within the quarter, 4.13
using the mean/average deviation while, the interquartile range is 8 whereas, 26.94 using the
sample variance with a 5.19 standard deviation, and 25.86 using the population variance having a
It is clearly show in the Table 5 that the most homogenous among the three quarter when
we use the range is the 1st quarter for having a range a 23. This implies that the student’s grades
in 1st quarter are much closer which particularly means that the student’s level of understanding
is pretty much the same compared to the 2nd and 3rd quarter. However, if we use average
deviation and interquartile range to measure the dispersion of students’ grades, it appears that the
3rd quarter grades are much lesser than the 1st and 2nd quarter. This means that the student’s
grades and level of understanding are much closer than the other two quarters. This goes the same
thing with the variance and standard deviation (sample and population) computations of student’s
grades. Therefore, the most homogenous among the three quarter is still the 3rd quarter which
implies the students are most likely on the same level of understanding.
The Range, Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and
Population), and Variance of Students’ Exam Results in First, Second, and Third Quarter.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their exam results. The result of the Range,
Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and Population), and
Variance of Students’ Grades in First, Second, and Third Quarter of Students’ Exam Results in
Table 6. Range, Average Deviation, Inter-quartile Range, Standard Deviation (Sample and
Population), and Variance of Students’ Exam Results in First, Second, and Third Quarter
Quarter First Second Third
Range 23 21 18
Mean/Average Deviation 5.52 4.48 4.13
Interquartile 9 5 8
Standard Deviation Sample 6.40 5.67 5.19
Population 6.28 5.56 5.09
Variance Sample 41.02 32.17 26.94
Population 39.38 30.88 25.86
Measures of Variability
1st Grading
CI f x CB cf<
60-66 2 63 59.5-66.5 2
67-73 1 70 66.5-73.5 3
74-80 13 77 73.5-80.5 16
81-87 2 84 80.5-87.5 18
88-94 6 91 87.5-94.5 24
95-101 1 98 94.5-100.5 25
n = 25
x=
∑ fx = 2009 =80.36
n 25
MD=
∑ f |x−x|= 177.52 =7.1008≈ 7.10
n 25
c. Interquartile Range: IQR=Q 3 −Q 1
CI f x C.B cf<
60-66 2 63 59.5-66.5 2
67-73 1 70 66.5-73.5 3
74-80 13 77 73.5-80.5 16 Q 1 middleclass
81-87 2 84 80.5-87.5 18
88-94 6 91 87.5-94.5 24 Q3 middle class
95-101 1 98 94.5-100.5 25
n = 25
kn 3 ( 25 ) 75
Q 3= = = =18.75
4 4 4
kn
Given: =18.75 , L Lqk =87.5 ,c fb =18 , f qk =6 , i=7
4
(( −c )
)
kn
i =87.5+ ( ) 7=87.5+ (
6 )
fb
4 18.75−18 0.75
Qk =L Lqk + 7=87.5+ ( 0.125 ) 7=87.5+ 0.875=88.37
f qk 6
kn 1 ( 25 ) 25
Q 1= = = =6.25
4 4 4
kn
Given: =6.25 , L Lqk =73.5 , c fb =3 , f qk =13 , i=7
4
(( −c )
)
kn
i =73.5+ (
13 )
7=73.5+(
13 )
fb
4 6.25−3 3.25
Qk =L Lqk + 7=73.5+ ( 0.25 ) 7=73.5+ 1.75=75.25
f qk
Variance: δ 2=
∑ ( x−u )2
n
Standard Deviation: δ=
CI f
√ ∑ ( x−u )2
x
n
fx ( x−u ) ( x−u )2 f ( x−u )
2
60-66 2 63 126 -17.36 301.3696 602.7392
67-73 1 70 70 -10.36 107.3296 107.3296
74-80 13 77 1001 -3.36 11.2896 146.7648
81-87 2 84 168 3.64 13.3496 26.4992
88-94 6 91 546 10.64 113.2096 679.2576
95-101 1 98 98 17.64 311.1696 311.1696
n = 25 ∑ fx=2009 ∑ f ( x−u )2=1873.76
u=
∑ fx = 2009 =80.36
25 n
2 ∑ ( x−u )
2
1873.76
δ = = =74.9504 ≈ 74.95
n 25
δ=
√ ∑ ( x−u )2 =
n
Variance and Standard Deviation (Sample)
√ 1873.76
25
= √ 74.9504=8.657389907 ≈ 8.66
2
Variance: s =
∑ ( x−u )2
n−1
Standard Deviation: s=
CI f
√ ∑ ( x−u )2
n−1
x fx ( x−u ) ( x−u )2 f ( x−u )
2
x=
∑ fx = 2009 =80.36
n 25
s2=
∑ ( x−x ) = 1873.76 =78.073333333≈ 78.07
2
n−1 24
s=
√ ∑ ( x−u )2 =
n−1 √ 1873.76
24
=√ 78.073333333=8.835911573 ≈ 8.84
2nd Grading
CI f x CB cf<
64-68 3 66 63.5-68.5 3
69-73 3 71 68.5-73.5 6
74-78 15 76 73.5-78.5 21
79-83 0 81 78.5-83.5 21
84-88 3 86 83.5-88.5 24
89-93 1 91 88.5-92.5 25
n = 25
x=
∑ fx = 1900 =76
n 25
MD=
∑ f |x−x|= 90 =3.6
n 25
c. Interquartile Range: IQR=Q3 −Q1
CI f x CB cf<
64-68 3 66 63.5-68.5 3
69-73 3 71 68.5-73.5 6
74-78 15 76 73.5-78.5 21 Q1∧Q3 middle class
79-83 0 81 78.5-83.5 21
84-88 3 86 83.5-88.5 24
89-93 1 91 88.5-92.5 25
n = 25
kn 3 ( 25 ) 75
Q 3= = = =18.75
4 4 4
kn
Given: =18.75 , L Lqk =73.5 , c fb =6 , f qk =15 , i=5
4
( ( )
)
kn
−c fb
Qk =L Lqk +
4
f qk
i =73.5+
18.75−6
15 ( 5=73.5+
3)
12.75
( )
=73.5+4.25=77.75
kn 1 ( 25 ) 25
Q 1= = = =6.25
4 4 5
kn
Given: =6.25 , L Lqk =73.5 , c fb =6 , f qk =15 , i=5
4
(( −c )
)
kn
i =73.5+ ( ) 5=73.5+ (
3 )
fb
4 6.25−6 0.25
Qk =L Lqk + =73.5+0.083333333=73.583333333≈ 73.58
f
qk 15
Standard Deviation: δ=
CI f
√ ∑ ( x−u )2
n
x fx ( x−u ) ( x−u )2 f ( x−u )
2
u=
∑ fx = 1900 =76
n 25
2 ∑ ( x−u )
2
900
δ = = =36
n 25
2
Variance: s =
∑ f ( x− x )2
n−1
Standard Deviation: s=
CI f
√ ∑ f ( x−x )2
n−1
x fx ( x−x ) ( x−x )2 f ( x−x )
2
x=
∑ fx = 1900 =76
n 25
2
s=
∑ 2
f ( x− x ) 900
= =37.5
n−1 24
√ ∑ f ( x−x )
√
2
900
s= = =√ 37.5=6.123724357 ≈ 6.12
n−1 24
3rd Grading
Measures of Variability
CI f x CB cf<
63-67 2 65 62.5-67.5 2
68-72 1 70 67.5-72.5 3
73-77 4 75 72.5-77.5 7
78-82 7 80 77.5-82.5 14
83-87 5 85 82.5-87.5 19
88-92 6 90 87.5-92.5 25
n = 25
x=
∑ fx = 2025 =81
n 25
MD=
∑ f |x−x|= 511 =20.44
n 25
( ( )
)
kn
−c fb
Qk =L Lqk +
4
f qk
i =82.5+
18.75−14
5 ( )
5=82.5+ ( 4.75 )=87.25
kn 1 ( 25 ) 25
Q 1= = = =6.25
4 4 5
kn
Given: =6.25 , L Lqk =72.5 , c fb =3 , f qk =4 , i=5
4
( ( )
)
kn
−c fb
Qk =L Lqk +
4
f qk
i =72.5+
6.25−3
4 (
5=72.5+
3.25
3 ) ( )
5=72.5+ ( 1.083333333 ) 5=72.5+5.41666667=
Variance: δ 2=
∑ ( x−u )2
n
Standard Deviation: δ=
CI f
√ ∑ ( x−u )2
x
n
fx ( x−u ) ( x−u )2 f ( x−u )
2
u=
∑ fx = 2025 =81
n 25
δ 2=
∑ ( x−u ) 2
=
1350
=54
n 25
δ=
√ ∑ ( x−u )2 =
n √ 1350
25
=√ 54=7.348369228 ≈7.35
Variance: s2=
∑ f ( x− x )2
n−1
Standard Deviation: s=
CI f
√ ∑ f ( x−x )2
n−1
x fx ( x−x ) ( x−x )2 f ( x−x )2
63-67 2 65 130 -16 256 512
68-72 1 70 70 -11 121 121
73-77 4 75 300 -6 36 144
78-82 7 80 560 -1 1 7
83-87 5 85 425 4 16 80
88-92 6 90 540 9 81 486
n = 25 ∑ fx=2025 ∑ f ( x−u )2=¿ 1350 ¿
x=
∑ fx = 2025 =81
n 25
2
s=
∑ f ( x− x ) = 1350 =56.25
2
n−1 24
s=
√ ∑ f ( x−x )2 =
n−1 √ 1350
24
= √ 56.25=7.5
table shows the Science students’ quarterly grades in the first, second, and third quarter. All in all,
there are 25 students showing their overall exam score in the first to third quarter. Presented in
the Table 5 Measure of Variation/Variability, Grouped Data are the range, average deviation,
interquartile range, standard deviation (sample and population), and variance. Within the 1st
Quarter, the dispersion of the Science class exam scores is 40 using the range, the mean/average
deviation is 7.10 while, the computed difference from the 3rd quartile and 1st quartile in the
interquartile range is 13.13, 78.07 using the sample variance with the standard deviation of 8.84,
and 74.95 using the population variance with the standard deviation of 8.66. Moreover, in the 2nd
quarter, the results show that there is a 29 length of distribution using the range, 3.6 using the
mean/average deviation while, the computed difference from the 3rd quartile and 1st quartile in
the interquartile range is 4.17 whereas, 37.5 sample variance with a 6.12 sample standard
deviation, and 36 using the population variance with the population standard deviation of 6.
However, the results in 3rd quarter shows that there is a 29 computed dispersion using the range
within the quarter, 20.44 using the mean/average deviation while, the interquartile range is 9.33
whereas, 56.25 using the sample variance with a 7.5 standard deviation, and 54 using the
It is clearly show in the Table 6 that the most homogenous among the three quarter when
we use the range is the 1st quarter for having a range a 40. This implies that the student’s exam
scores in 1st quarter are much closer which particularly means that the student’s level of
understanding is pretty much the same compared to the 2nd and 3rd quarter. However, if we use
average deviation and interquartile range to measure the dispersion of students’ exam scores, it
appears that the 2rd quarter exam scores are much lesser than the 1st and 3nd quarter. This means
that the student’s grades and level of understanding are much closer than the other two quarters.
This goes the same thing with the variance and standard deviation (sample and population)
computations of students’ exam score. Therefore, the most homogenous among the three quarter
is still the 1rd quarter which implies the students are most likely on the same level of
understanding.
The 1st and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’ Quarterly
Grades in First, Second, and Third.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their grades. The result of the 1st and 2nd,
1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’ Quarterly Grades in First, Second,
Table 7. 1st and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’
Quarterly Grades in First, Second, and Third.
1st and 2nd 1st and 3rd 2nd and 3rd
Results 0.94 0.93 1.56
Description Very Strong Very Strong Very Strong
Interpretation Table
Coefficient Interval Correlation
0.00-199 Very Weak
0.20-399 Weak
0.40-599 Medium
0.60-799 Strong
0.80-1000 Very Strong
Computation (Ungrouped data)
Test of Relationship
1st and 2nd Grading Grades
N ∑ xy−(∑ x)(∑ y)
n= 25 r xy =
√ [ N ∑ x −( ∑ x ) ] [ N ∑ y −( ∑ y ) ]
2 2 2 2
25 ( 177,475 )−(2,103)(2,100)
∑ xy=177,475 r xy =
√ [ 25(177,889)−(4,422,609) ] ¿ ¿ ¿
∑ x=¿ 2,103
4,436,875−4,416,300
r xy =
√ [ 4,447,225−(4,422,609)] [ 4,429,300−(4,410,000)]
20,575
∑ y=¿2,100 r xy =
√ 475,088,800
20,575
∑ x 2=¿ 177,889 r xy =
21,796.53
( ∑ x )2=4,422,609 r xy =0.94
2
∑ y =¿ 177,172
( ∑ y )2=¿ 4,410,000
1st and 3rd Grading
N ∑ xy−(∑ x)(∑ y)
n=25 r xy =
√ [ N ∑ x −( ∑ x ) ] [ N ∑ y −( ∑ y ) ]
2 2 2 2
∑ xy=179,246
(25)(179,246)−(2,103)(2,122)
r xy =
√ [(25)(177,889)−( 4,422,609)][(25)(180,762)−(4,502,884)]
∑ x=¿ 2,103
4,481,150−4,462,566
r xy =
√ [(4,447,225)−(4,422,609)] [(4,519,050)−(4,502,884) ]
18,484
∑ y=¿2,122 r xy =
√ 397,942,256
18,484
2
∑ x =177,889 r xy =
19,948.49
( ∑ x )2=4,422,609 r xy =0.93
2
∑ y =180,762
( ∑ y )2=4,502,884
∑ xy=178,895
(25)(178,895)−( 2,100)( 2,122)
r xy =
√ [(25)(177,172)−( 4,410,000) ][(25)(180,762)−(4,502,884)]
∑ x=¿ 2,100
4,472,375−4,456,200
r xy =
√ [(4,429,300)−(4,422,609)] [(4,519,050)−(4,502,884) ]
16,175
∑ y=¿2,122 r xy =
√ 108,166,706
16,175
2
∑ x =177,172 r xy =
10,400.32
2
( ∑ x ) =4,410,000 r xy =1.56
∑ y 2=180,762
( ∑ y )2=4,502,884
Presented above is the Table 7 Test of Relationships, Ungrouped data of 1st quarter, 2nd
quarter and 3rd quarter. All in all, there are 25 students showing their overall grades in the first to
third quarter. Presented in the Table 7 is the Test of Relationship, Ungrouped Data are the
computed the degree of relationship between 1st and 2nd quarterly grades, 1st and 3rd quarterly
grades, and 2nd and 3rd quarterly grades. It shows that the relationship between the 1st and 2nd
quarter is 0.94. It implies that there is a very strong positive correlation and direct relationship
that has been made in these two quarters. The second relationship that is being computed is the
1st quarter and 3rd quarter which shows that there is a 0.93 very strong positive correlation and it
is still a direct relationship. 2nd quarter and 3rd quarter test of relationship, correspondingly
shows that there is 1.56 degree of relationship and it particularly implies that their relationship is
a very strong positive correlation and direct relationship. Therefore, when the 1 st quarterly grades
of the students increases or decreases, the 2 nd quarterly grades are also increase or decreases, and
The 1st and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’ Exam Results in
First, Second, and Third Quarter.
The general aim of this table is to identify the general performance of the students in first
grading, second grading, and third grading based on their exam results. The result of the 1st and
2nd, 1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’ Exam Results in First,
Table 8. 1st and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, and 2nd and 3rd Test of Relationship of Students’
Quarterly Exam Results in First, Second, and Third.
Interpretation Table
Coefficient Interval Correlation
0.00-199 Very Weak
0.20-399 Weak
0.40-599 Medium
0.60-799 Strong
0.80-1000 Very Strong
n ∑ xy −∑ x ∑ y
r=
√ [ n ∑ x −(∑ x ) ] ¿ ¿ ¿
2 2
3832471.5−3809042.88
r=
√ [ 4058000−4016016 ][ 3635967.3−3612736.518 ]
23428.62
r=
√ [ 41984 ][ 23230.782 ]
23428.62
r=
√ 975321151.5
23428.62
r=
31230.13211
r =0.750192792
r ≈ 0.75
2nd and 3rd Grading
n ∑ xy −∑ x ∑ y
r=
√ [ n ∑ x −(∑ x ) ] ¿ ¿ ¿
2 2
3865616.5−3848958
r=
√ [ 3635967.3−3612736.518 ][ 4133425−4100625 ]
16658.5
r=
√ [ 23230.782 ] [ 32800 ]
16658.5
r=
√ 761969649.6
16658.5
r=
27603.79774
r =0.603485801
r ≈ 0.60
1st and 3rd Grading
n ∑ xy −∑ x ∑ y
r=
√ [ n ∑ x −(∑ x ) ] ¿ ¿ ¿
2 2
4090700−4058100
r=
√ [ 4058000−4016016 ][ 4133425−4100625 ]
32600
r=
√ [ 41984 ][ 32800 ]
32600
r=
√ 1377075200
32600
r=
37108.96388
r =0.878493943
r ≈ 0.88
Presented above is the Table 8 Test of Relationships, Grouped data of 1st quarter, 2nd
quarter and 3rd quarter. All in all, there are 25 students showing their overall exam results in the
first to third quarter. Shown in the Table 8 is the Test of Relationship, Grouped Data are the
computed the degree of relationship between 1st and 2nd quarterly grades, 1st and 3rd quarterly
grades, and 2nd and 3rd quarterly grades. It shows that the relationship between the 1st and 2nd
quarter is 0.75. It implies that there is a strong positive correlation and direct relationship that has
been made in these two quarters. The second relationship that is being computed is the 1st quarter
and 3rd quarter which shows that there is a 0.88 very strong positive correlation and it is still a
direct relationship. 2nd quarter and 3rd quarter test of relationship, correspondingly shows that
there is 0.60 degree of relationship and it particularly implies that their relationship is a strong
positive correlation and direct relationship. Therefore, when the 1 st quarterly grades of the
students increases or decreases, the 2 nd quarterly grades are also increase or decreases, and so to