The document summarizes theories and methods of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for couple relationships. It discusses the phases of development in CBT couple therapy, how CBT and integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT) work, and compares the two approaches. The key phases include behavioral couple therapy, new BCT focusing on self-regulation, and the current phase addressing psychological disorders. CBT for couples focuses on changing behaviors, communication skills, and cognitive appraisals, while IBCT adds a focus on emotional acceptance to facilitate change and reduce conflict.
The document summarizes theories and methods of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for couple relationships. It discusses the phases of development in CBT couple therapy, how CBT and integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT) work, and compares the two approaches. The key phases include behavioral couple therapy, new BCT focusing on self-regulation, and the current phase addressing psychological disorders. CBT for couples focuses on changing behaviors, communication skills, and cognitive appraisals, while IBCT adds a focus on emotional acceptance to facilitate change and reduce conflict.
and methods of couple relationships Couple Counselling Skills Kevin Standish Learning outcomes 1. Phases of Development in CBT couple therapy 2. How CBT for Couples Works Generally 3. Comparison of CBT Couples therapy with Integrative behavioural couples therapy Overview 1. Phases of Development in CBT couple therapy 2. How CBT for Couples Works Phases of Development in CBT couple therapy • Behavioral couple therapy (BCT), launched by the work of Stuart and Jacobson has itself passed through quite distinct periods: • The “Old BCT” phase emphasized skills training (e.g., communication and problem solving) and change in overt behavior (e.g., behavioural exchanges), and the therapist’s role was highly psychoeducational and directive. • “New BCT” phase, marked by the development of “Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy” (Christensen, Jacobson, & Babcock, 1995) shifted to a more balanced position of changing self as well, marked by new interventions to facilitate the development of greater mutual acceptance, especially around repetitive patterns of interaction and persistent partner characteristics or what Gottman (1999) called “perpetual issues.” • The “Self-Regulation Phase,” focused on the very salient impact of partners’ affective self- regulation capacity, as sometimes highlighted in clinical work with volatile, “difficult” couples, in which, for example, one of the partners has with a demonstrably significant personality disorder, often, but not always, borderline personality disorder. This self-regulation phase overlaps with the very current phase of BCT’s evolution which has made significant contributions to the treatment of a wide variety of psychological/psychiatric disorders in their intimate relational context (e.g., alcoholism and drug abuse, sexual dysfunction, depression, and bipolar disorder). Cognitive Behavioral Couples Therapy (CBCT) • has become one of the most well researched approaches for the treatment of marital and couple distress, with growing empirical support for it effectiveness. Theoretically grounded in both social learning and social exchange theories, the premise of CBCT is that an individual’s behavior both influences and is influenced by his/her environment. When applied to a marriage or other long-term relationship, this premise suggests that one partner’s behavior influences and is influenced by the actions of the other. CBCT typically focuses on two aspects of this process: (a) exchanges of positive and negative behaviors; (b) communication skills that influence the interaction process (Epstein, Baucom, & Daiuto, 1997). Cognitive Behavioral Couple Therapy • begins with education, from a scientific perspective, on the biological and psychological processes that underlie marital interactions, how interactions become ineffective over time and how to get them back on track. Next, the therapist and couple work together to assess how these patterns play out in the couple’s relationship. Subsequent sessions are then used as opportunities for the couple to practice communicating about challenging topics with the therapist as coach. The therapist listens and guides the couple in effective interaction. He helps the couple identify and examine the behaviors that are destructive to the marriage (e.g., the “four horsemen” ), and prompts them to try out alternative, more effective ways of thinking and behaving. There is a strong focus on monitoring for emotion “spikes” that hijack effective communication and trigger destructive expressions, and promoting emotion regulation when these occur. Finding ways to accept and manage core differences is also emphasized. Finally, shared goals are encouraged, and used as opportunities to build positive emotional experience together to sustain an effective friendship for the years to come. Based on Gottman • Research by John Gottman a leading marital therapist, shows that the success or failure of a relationship can be predicted with 96% accuracy. This is based on the presence or absence of four simple behaviours. • Criticism: Attacking your partner’s personality or character, usually with the intent of making someone right and someone wrong. • Contempt: Attacking your partner’s sense of self with the intention to insult or psychologically abuse him/her. • Defensiveness: Seeing one's self as the victim and continuously warding off a perceived attack. • Stonewalling: Withdrawing from the relationship as a way to avoid conflict. Cognitive-Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Based on a belief that people evaluate their relationship and partners
according to unreasonable standards. • If people’s appraisals of events are altered then there will be positive changes in behavior and emotion accordingly. • Two different stresses: primary distress and secondary distress. Cognitive-Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Primary distress comes from one partner’s unmet needs (affiliation,
intimacy, autonomy...). • Secodary distress emerges when that partner uses wrong strategies to address the conflict coming from unmet needs (ignoring, verbally or physically attacking). Cognitive-Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Delivered within 8-25 sessions.
• First 2-3 sessions are for the assessment and followed by a feedback session. The couple and the therapist define the treatment goals together. • Socratic questioning and guided discovery techniques may be used. Cognitive-Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Socratic questioning involves asking the client a series of questions to
reevaluate the logic behind his/her certain beliefs. • Guided discovery involves creating experiences (role playing, pros and cons of the relationship) to have different perspectives. Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Adds “emotional acceptance” to BCT to increase positive feelings.
• Jacobson and Christensen (1996) say that in the early stages, partners tolerate the differences in personality and see it them as the source of attraction. • In time, these differences become sources of discontent and concern, and result in polarization, vilification. Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy
• This therapy is interested in the agent of behavior and the
receiver together. • According to this therapy increased acceptance reduces conflict and is a catalyst for change. • Acceptance techniques’ aim is to soften the adversarial attitudes partners take toward each other. Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy
• Gottman says that some problems cannot be solved. Instead of
aiming to solve them the sources of conflict can be turned into sources of intimacy. • IBCT therapists determine a central theme which summarizes the central issue. • They believe that as partners try to change each other, polarization occurs. This is called the mutual trap. Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy • The effort to change eachother creates a defense, therefore the partner who want to change the other experiences a frustration and hopelessness. • The theme+polarization+mutual trap= the formulation. • Interested in the history of the relationship, the individual’s family, and individual’s previous relationships. How CBT for Couples Works
• Cognitive Behavioural Therapy is used to identify these behaviours , understand the
triggers, expectations, beliefs and attitudes that keep them going and identify and practise healthy a realistic alternatives. • There are five steps in the CBT for couples process: 1. Identifying and acknowledging individual expectations and perceptions. 2. Exploring counter-productive triggers, beliefs and behaviours. 3. Agreeing differences and acceptable tolerance ranges. 4. Identifying and practising new behaviours based on shared values, mutual respect, empathy, trust and tolerance. 5. Agreeing a new "emotional contract". This expresses the changes that each partner commits to and forms the basis of the future relationship. Couples are encouraged to adopt a positive emotional tone by actively building a shared vision for the future. Relationship resilience is developed by shifting the focus and over- riding conflict with a willingness to respect and tolerate each other's differences. Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy • Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy is "integrative" in at least two senses: • First, it integrates the twin goals of acceptance and change as positive outcomes for couples in therapy. Couples who succeed in therapy usually make some concrete changes to accommodate the needs of the other but they also show greater emotional acceptance of the other. • Second, IBCT integrates a variety of treatment strategies under a consistent behavioral theoretical framework. Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy • Both the integrative and traditional behavioral couples therapy models have origins primarily in behaviorism. • While traditional behavioral couples therapy has more roots in social learning principles and the later model in Skinnerian behaviorism. • The Integrative model draws heavily on the use of functional analysis (psychology) and the Skinnerian distinction between contingency shaped and rule governed behavior to balance acceptance and change in the relationship Comparative Framework. • 1. Background of the Approach • 2. The Healthy/Well-Functioning versus Pathological/Dysfunctional Couple/Marriage • 3. The Role of the Therapist • 4. Assessment and Treatment Planning • 5. Goal Setting • 6. Process and Technical Aspects of Couple Therapy • 7. Curative Factors/Mechanisms of Change • 8. Treatment Applicability and Empirical Support 1. Background of the Approach
(CBCT) (IBCT) third-wave behavioral therapies • developed from the confluence of three • IBCT grew principally from traditional major influences: behavioural couple therapy (TBCT): skills- • (1) behavioral couple therapy • based, change-oriented treatment that relies on two primary intervention components: (1) • (2) cognitive therapy (CT) behavior exchange, and (2) communication • (3) information processing in the field of and problem-solving training. cognitive psychology regarding attributions • problems that represented basic and that individuals make about determinants of irreconcilable differences between partners positive and negative events in their appeared to be less amenable to traditional relationships and relatively stable schemas change strategies. that individuals develop on the basis of past relationship experiences and subsequently • the key to a better result was to promote apply in understanding current relationship emotional acceptance of the other and not events. emphasize change so much. Jacobson and Christensen (1998) see acceptance as the “missing link” in couple intervention. 2. The Healthy/Well-Functioning versus Pathological/Dysfunctional Couple/Marriage Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • CBCT employs a broader contextual • Distress is caused by the destructive ways perspective in defining a healthy that some couples respond to areas of relationship, difference and disagreement, which are • A “healthy relationship” is defined as one assumed to be both normal and in that contributes to the growth and inevitable. well-being of both partners, in which the • Differences between partners are likely to partners function well together as a team create difficulties when these differences and relate to their physical and social spring from vulnerabilities within each environment in an adaptive fashion partner rather than mere differences in • A healthy couple relationship is one preference. thatcontributes to the growth, • Three destructive patterns frequently development, wellbeing, and needs characterize distressed couples’ conflicts fulfillment of each partner. over their differences: 1.mutual coercion, 2.vilification, and 3.polarization. 2. The Healthy/Well-Functioning versus Pathological/Dysfunctional Couple/Marriage Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • partners in distressed relationships are more likely to track negative behavior selectively in • distressed couples experience an the other, to make negative attributions for erosion in their willingness to such behavior and to reciprocate negative accept, tolerate, and compromise behavior with negative behaviour. As partners around one another’s differences, continue to engage in negative reciprocity they no longer look upon each and perceive the other in a negative way, they may develop “sentiment override,” or global other’s styles as sources of negative emotions, toward each other. This attraction; they begin to exert sentiment override increases the likelihood of efforts to change their partners subsequent negative behavior and the development of partners’ negative • Happy couples are able to confront expectancies or predictions that the other their differences with greater person will engage in negative acts. A cycle of self-maintaining process of relationship acceptance and tolerance. discord that often typifies distressed couple. 3. The Role of the Therapist
(CBCT) (IBCT) • during the assessment and the early stages of therapy, the therapist assumes a didactic role, striking a balance between • IBCT therapist is frequently very active directiveness and collaboration with the couple in setting and directive in sessions, the goals and applying cognitive-behavioural strategies toward achieving them. particular form of the therapist’s • Once treatment begins, the therapist at times assumes a interventions will vary didactic role and provides rationales for treatment recommendations and the assignment of homework; • therapist requires comfort with a high • reviews assignments and events that occurred in the degree of flexibility and change relationship during the past week; • models skills and coaches the partners in practicing them in • the highest priority for the IBCT and outside of sessions; and continually fosters partners’ therapist is maintaining a focus on the motivation. case formulation of the couple • The therapist’s level of directiveness varies according to the partners’ presenting concerns ; their ability to self-monitor their behaviors, emotions, and cognitions; and their • therapist is to attend to and highlight preference for structure in therapy the function of behaviors. 3. The Role of the Therapist Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • the CBCT therapist also sets the pace of sessions, so that the goals of treatment are addressed in a timely and reasonable • Using this historical context, the fashion. therapist suggests that these • In collaboration with the couple, the therapist typically initiates setting the agenda for each session, contributing histories have occasioned the particular agenda items such as review of homework and current behaviors and associated practice of a particular skill, always soliciting the couple’s preferences for the agenda. feelings • The therapist then monitors the use of time during the session and ensures that the agenda is followed to the • Multiple roles of educator, teacher; degree appropriate Coach; skills provider; facilitator; • The therapist also adopts the role of facilitator, creating a safe and supportive environment in which the couple can • The IBCT therapist uses language as address difficult issues. an important intervention tool, • it is important the therapist’s direction and imposition of because impactful language is one structure gradually diminish over time, as the partners assume increasing responsibility for managing their concerns. important way to alter a couple’s relationship context 4. Assessment and Treatment Planning
(CBCT) (IBCT) • The primary goals of a clinical assessment are: • A comprehensive and structured assessment • (1) to identify the concerns and potential areas of process provides the foundation enrichment/ growth for which a couple has sought assistance; • The foundation of any truly behavioral • (2) to clarify the cognitive, behavioral, and affective factors assessment process is the functional analysis associated with the two individuals, the couple as a dyad, • With that information,the clinician can then and the couple’s environment, that contribute to their presenting concerns; alter the controlling stimuli and change the • (3) to determine the appropriateness of couple therapy in problematic behaviour addressing these concerns. • the therapist seeks to understand the • The therapist clarifies partners’ goals for treatment and their variables that control dissatisfaction, which respective positions and perspectives regarding the areas of are more often broad response classes of concern. behaviour to see the common thread in • the therapist determines each partner’s emotional diverse complaints and problems investment and motivation for continuing with the relationship. 4. Assessment and Treatment Planning
(CBCT) (IBCT) • the focus is on strengths, as well as • A functional analysis in IBCT emphasizes problems, the questions posed by the not only the broad class of behaviors by therapist often draw partners’ the “agent” that is a source of attention to the positive aspects of dissatisfaction for the recipient but also their relationship. the reactions of the recipient partner. • Distressed couples entering therapy • The primary goal of the functional analysis is the development of a case often selectively track negative formulation and a resultant treatment behaviors and events, so refocusing plan. on the positive can increase • the “formulation” comprises three • common methods are used in self- primary components: the theme, the report, interview, and observational polarization process, and the mutual trap. approaches to assessment. 5. Goal Setting
(CBCT) (IBCT) • The therapist also describes behavioral, • The major treatment goals in IBCT are cognitive, and affective response patterns to help couples better understand and that the assessment has indicated are accept one another as individuals and contributors to the couple’s relationship to develop a collaborative set difficulties. whereby each partner is willing to • The therapist asks the partners for make necessary changes to improve feedback about this case the quality of the relationship. conceptualization,checking to see whether it matches their views of their • Specific goals for treatment are difficulties. determined collaboratively by the therapist and couple, and are • The therapist then collaborates with the explicitly discussed during the couple in translating descriptions of feedback session. relationship problems into statements of positive goals. 5. Goal Setting Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • The therapist relates these goals to • The formulation is so important that it specific intervention techniques designed forms an overarching goal to get to substitute desired patterns for the couples to see their relationship existing ones. through the lens of the formulation, • Explicit goal setting is important as it relates to their daily struggles and • It is important that the therapist joys, the therapist helps the couple process their interactions throughout • caution the partners that it is not unusual the treatment for additional concerns to present themselves as therapy progresses, • Implicit in the goals of understanding, particularly if a pressing problem has acceptance, and collaboration is the distracted them from noticing other acknowledgment that staying issues. together is not always the right • Goals for therapy often evolve over time. outcome for all couples 6. Process and Technical Aspects of Couple Therapy Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • it is important to recognize that • Interventions fall into three behavior, cognitions, and categories: 1. acceptance emotions are integrally related. strategies, 2. tolerance strategies, 3. change strategies. • Changes in one domain typically • 1. acceptance strategies: produce changes in the other empathic joining; unified domains detachment; these strategies aim to help couples turn their problems into vehicles for greater intimacy. 6. Process and Technical Aspects of Couple Therapy Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • Interventions for Modifying • 2. tolerance strategies: allow partners Behavior: Guided Behavior to let go of their efforts to change one Change; Skills-Based Interventions; another. Techniques such as pointing out the positive features of negative • Interventions That Address behavior, practicing negative behavior Cognitions: Socratic Questioning; in the therapy session, faking negative Guided Discovery; behavior between sessions, and self- • Interventions Focused on care Emotions: Restricted or Minimized • 3. change strategies: behavior Emotions; Containing the exchange techniques and Experience/Expression communication/problem-solving training • of Emotions; • Acceptance through Empathic Joining 7. Curative Factors /Mechanisms of Change Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Integrative behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) (IBCT) • different couples might need • all the strategies in IBCT come different types of intervention, from a behavioural theoretical and mechanisms of change vary perspective accordingly • it integrates strategies for change with strategies for • relationship schematic acceptance. processing (RSP) refers to the degree to which an individual • IBCT focuses as much on the recipient of behavior as on the processes information in terms agent of behavior. of circular relationship processes 7. Curative Factors/Mechanisms of Change
(CBCT) (IBCT) • three major reasons for the shift in emphasis in IBCT from the • Therapists who are able to agent to the recipientof behavior: • 1. there are in every relationship some “unsolvable” process information quickly and problems that the agent is unwilling or unable to change to the level the recipient desires. Improvement in these cases respond in the moment are will be mediated by increased acceptance and tolerance. • 2. Paradoxically, increased acceptance in one partner may at most effective with this times also mediate increased change. The pressure for change from one partner that contributes to the approach. maintenance of the undesirable partner behavior. Thus, when the pressure to change is eliminated by increased acceptance or tolerance, change may follow. As partners let go of their efforts to change one another, they become less emotionally reactive; as a result, change becomes more likely. • 3.the reaction to an offending behaviour is as much a problem as the offending behaviour itself.: “crimes of the heart are usually misdemeanors” 8. Treatment Applicability and Empirical Support
(CBCT) (IBCT) • CBCT is the most widely evaluated • Improvements in relationship couple treatment satisfaction and stability come about • findings suggest that between roughly through changes in behavior, and 33 and 67% of couples are in the changes in the emotional reactivity nondistressed range of marital (acceptance) of that behaviour satisfaction after receiving CBCT. • IBCT improved or recovered (80%) • Most couples appear to maintain compared to couples treated with these gains for short time periods (6– TBCT (64%). 12 months); however, long range • 69% of IBCT couples demonstrated follow-up results are not as clinically significant improvement at encouraging. 30% of couples who had the 2-year follow-up relative to their recovered during therapy initial status subsequently relapsed Readings • Core Readings: • Gurman (2008) : • Chapter 2. Cognitive- behavioral Couple Therapy by Donald H. Baucom , Norman B. Epstein, Jaslean J. LaTaillade , and Jennifer S. Kirby. • Chapter 3: . integrative behavioral Couple Therapy Sona Dimidjian, Christopher R. Martell, and Andrew Christensen • Patterson (2005) CBT couple therapy • Advanced reading: • Gurman (2008) Chapter 13: integrative Couple Therapy: a depth- behavioral approach • Mairal & Cela (2015) Integrative Behavioural couple therapy • Davila (2003) chapter 7 attachment processes in couple therapy: informing behavioural models found in Johnson and Whiffen (2003).
Peter L. Sheras, Phyllis R. Koch-Sheras Couple Power Therapy Building Commitment, Cooperation, Communication, and Community in Relationships Psychologists in Independent Practice 2006