THD-P-008 Transit Packaging Method and Shipping Appearance review-UL-V3 - 2015-11-30
THD-P-008 Transit Packaging Method and Shipping Appearance review-UL-V3 - 2015-11-30
Sample Defect
# Test Property Test Method Test Principle/Requirements Results Rating
Size Code
1.2 Box Manufacturers Visual Check/ THD 1 For all shipments to and within the USA &
Certificate (BMC) Requirement Canada: All Home Depot master shipping
containers must be clearly marked on the bottom
panel (typically) with the box manufacturers
certificate (BMC). The certificate verifies that the
shipper meets the material requirements stated
in the BMC and the structural requirements of
Item 222 and Rule 41 that is found in the National
Motor Freight Classification
Lab note :
Need verify BMC information such as corrugate
type and BST value (single wall or double wall
should be same with PPT sample and actual )
and printer name.
1.3 Pallet Review( if Visual Check/ 1 Pallet should be review against THD pallet review
applicable ) SOP, need include dimension , construction and
Pallet Review SOP material..
All palletized loads (unless specified by THD
Packaging Engineers)
Pallet Review Form must be completed with
results and distributed within PPT report (the
same as CTQ results)
PKG PPT will be failed if pallet is not
compliant to THD Standard
Note: For HDC, pallet is not required when
packaged product is over 150lbs.
1.10 UPC Barcode Label Visual Check/ 1 UPC barcode label which stick on the package and
Verification (apply to all THD Requirement product require verifying the label material/structure is
onboarded products) “self-destructing” while peel-off by adding cut-line on it.
) ( i.e.: curve cut line, circle cut line, straight line)
Lab Notes:
1. If a pressure-sensitive UPC label is provided at PPT
and the label size is below 2.5”×2.5” (applies to labels
with an area of 6.25 sq. inches or less), the label must
be checked. If it is not slit/scored or “self-destructing”,
such case is a failure point at PPT.
1.11 Outer Package marking For 49 CFR Part 173.185 1 (1) The outer package that contains lithium metal cells
Smaller Cell or Batteries or batteries must be marked: “PRIMARY LITHIUM
BATTERIES— FORBIDDEN FOR TRANSPORT
ABOARD PASSENGER AIRCRAFT” or “LITHIUM
METAL BATTERIES—FORBIDDEN FOR
TRANSPORT ABOARD PASSENGER AIRCRAFT”,
or labeled with a “CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY”, except
when lithium metal cells or batteries are packed with or
contained in equipment in quantities not exceeding 5
kg net weight.
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS
2.1 New requirements for CFR 49 – Subtitle B - 1 Except for a package containing button cell batteries
shipping carton markings Chapter I – installed in equipment (including circuit boards), or no
Subchapter C – Part more than four lithium cells or two lithium batteries
173.185 (c) (3) (4) installed in the equipment(:
The outer package must be marked with:
TRANSPORTATION
(A) An indication that the package contains “lithium
OF DANGEROUS
metal” or “lithium ion” cells or batteries, as appropriate;
GOODS ACT, 1992
(B) An indication that the package is to be handled
P.C. 2014-1461
with care and that a flammable hazard exits if the
Clause 49 34(4) package is damaged;
2.2 Closure method of Visual Check/ 1 Staples manufacturing joint can be used when
manufacturing joint THD Requirement packaging weight is over 50lbs and all patio
products .Otherwise , need be special approval by
THD packaging team .
2.3 Strapping Usage Visual Check/ 1 Strapping can not be used as closure method unless
THD Requirement specified by THD. See below application where
Critical - is reserved for defects which could result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using or maintaining the product as well as defects contravening legal
regulations
Major - refers to functional defects reducing the usability or solidity of the product as well as obvious visual defects reducing the sales value of the product
Minor - refers to defects that are unlikely to reduce the use of the product, but nevertheless may influence the sale
Good – no defect found
Checklist
This checklist is designed to help service provider protocol writer ensure that the test protocol is completed to an acceptable standard for editorial and peer review.
Service providers should ask themselves each of the below questions when writing the test protocol.
o Check “Yes” if question has been considered in the test protocol writing.
o Check “N/A” if question is not applicable to the test protocol.
Please include comments. The protocol will be returned to the service provider contact author if any parts are incomplete.
Remember to include this completed checklist with your protocol when you submit it to THD.
3.1. Do product performance characteristics conform to product requirements and product claim (i.e.
accuracy, power source, response time, battery life, etc.)?
3.2. Is the product being tested appropriately to validate its intended function as described in the
instruction manual?
3.3. Did you consider previous recall data on similar products (THD recall data, CPSC website)?
3.4. Did you consider the critical, major, and minor findings on similar products?
3.5. Did you consider environmental factors (i.e. corrosion testing, water permeation, UV, etc...)?
3.6. Have THD standards been taken into consideration (Product Specification, Manufacturing
excellence in the supplier reference guide)?
3.7. Is packaging testing in accordance to THD packaging PPT SOP Requirements?
4. Safety Tests
4.1. Has the safety standard been considered in generation of test protocol?
4.1.1. Are all of the relevant governing bodies over the safety listing in this product identified?
4.1.2. What were the latest updates to the standard?
4.1.3. Have you reviewed any pending changes to standards and federal / state regulations?
4.1.4. If sold in Mexico and Canada, are there additional NOM or Health Canada requirements?
4.2. Did you consider if this product has play value and/or if it looks like a toy?
4.3. How could the customer misuse the product?
4.3.1. Did you consider the potential misuses of the product which could cause key safety issues
(i.e. fall, hurt, suffocate)?
4.3.2. Did you consider the past misuse issues into protocol (if available)?
5. Chemical Analysis
5.1. Were all controlled / regulated hazardous materials checked (Lead, Mercury, Cadmium,
Hexavalent Chromium, Polybrominated Biphenyls, Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether,
Formaldehyde, Phathalete, and other hazardous substances)?
6. Other
o Were all special features on instruction sheet or packaging verified?
o Did you consider the test to verify the potential manufacturing process defects?
Revision History