CEP Report
CEP Report
By
GROUP A
Supervisor
AUG 2022
Group members:
GROUP (A)
3 48947 ZAINAB
6TH Semester
2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
2.1. BACKGROUND:........................................................................................................ 1
4. OBJECTIVE: ...................................................................................................................... 3
5. METHODOLOGY: ............................................................................................................ 3
5.5. MODEL:...................................................................................................................... 9
.............................................................................................................................................. 13
7. CONCLUSION: ............................................................................................................... 20
Tables:
2.2. PARAMETERS:
Length of the bridge: 80 m.
Span 4@20.
Roadway width: 7.320 m.
2.3. MATERIALS:
The following materials are used for bridge construction.
1
2.4. LOADS:
Live load AASHTO LRFD
HL93 Truck
HL93 Tandem
HL-93S.PNG
HL-93KPNG
HL-93MVehicle Load.PNG
Dynamic Allowance 33%
Earthquake AASHTO-LRFD-12
2.5. LOCATION:
The Kirani bridge is located on Kirani road (west of Quetta).
2
Figure 2.2: Arial Photograph
3. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
To perform the structure analysis of Kirani bridge using CSI Bridge software under the
ASSHTO LRFD-12 load combinations.
4. OBJECTIVE:
To perform the structure analysis of Kirani bridge using CSI Bridge software under the
ASSHTO LRFD-12 load combinations.
5. METHODOLOGY:
5.1. SOFTWARE:
Modern engineering software give enormous variety of software’s for the analysis of the
bridges. Here are the most popular versions of such types of software: Midas Civil software,
SAP2000, STAAD Pro, CSI Bridge, Autodesk Structural Bridge Design, RISA, LARSA 4D
Bridge Series and CSI Bridge. Here CSI Bridge Software is used for modeling and analysis
of the bridge.
5.2. METHOD:
The CSI Bridge software use finite element method for analysis. The finite element method
(FEM) is a general tool for solving differential equations suitable for structural engineering
applications. FEM is capable of handling large structural mechanics problems by discretizing
the problem into a finite number of elements, which in turn is governed by equations.
3
5.3. LOAD COMBINATIONS:
The load combinations used in Midas Civil are as per AASHTO LRFD-16 given below:
4
Figure 5.1: Load Combo
5
Figure 5.3: AASHTO HL93 Truck
6
Figure 5.7: Barrier Load
7
5.4. DRAWINGS:
8
5.5. MODEL:
Bridge model made in midas civil is given below;
9
6. ANALYSIS RESULT INTREPETATION:
6.1. DEFLECTION DUE TO LOADS:
The deflection due to loading in CSI Bridge is given below;
10
6.2. MOMENTS:
11
Figure 6.6: Moment Due AASHTO Truck Load
6.3. STRESSES:
12
6.4. SHEAR FORCES DUE TO LOADS:
13
Figure 6.11: Shear Force Due to Truck Load
14
6.5. INFLUENCE LINE DIAGRAM DUE TO MOVING LOADS:
15
Table 6.1: Joint Reactions (Force and Moments)
16
Table 6.2: Joint Reactions
Joint OutputCase CaseType StepType F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3
Text Text Text Text Kip Kip Kip Kip-in Kip-in Kip-in
462 Berrier LinStatic 29.228 -0.118 0.74 -3.904 -135.98 -8.065
462 DW LinStatic 18.385 0.008669 0.509 0.356 -93.797 0.627
462 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 407.349 9.489 13.314 134.731 1600.62 868.956
462 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 161.63 -9.646 -13.721 -138.139 -1338.435 -879.424
462 Str-I8 Combination Max 329.068 9.482 12.572 134.429 1039.924 868.423
462 Str-I8 Combination Min 161.63 -9.623 -11.912 -136.894 -919.771 -877.825
464 DEAD LinStatic 152.491 1.425E-08 -3.382 3.238E-08 671.25 0.000001283
464 Berrier LinStatic 20.186 0.000018 0.69 0.0002186 -127.817 0.001537
464 DW LinStatic 19.16 -1.129E-10 0.515 1.199E-09 -94.633 -1.002E-08
464 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 409.313 10.528 13.309 136.965 1586.096 931.307
464 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 166.81 -10.528 -14.647 -136.965 -1205.113 -931.304
464 Str-I8 Combination Max 275.666 10.528 6.642 136.965 1044.535 931.307
464 Str-I8 Combination Min 167.602 -10.528 -9.733 -136.965 -436.326 -931.304
466 DEAD LinStatic 149.782 -0.051 -3.387 -0.347 671.996 -3.497
466 Berrier LinStatic 29.228 0.118 0.74 3.905 -135.981 8.068
466 DW LinStatic 18.385 -0.008669 0.509 -0.356 -93.797 -0.627
466 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 407.35 9.646 13.314 138.14 1600.618 879.428
466 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 161.63 -9.489 -13.721 -134.731 -1338.437 -868.953
466 Str-I8 Combination Max 329.069 9.623 12.572 136.895 1039.923 877.828
466 Str-I8 Combination Min 161.63 -9.482 -11.912 -134.428 -919.772 -868.421
470 DEAD LinStatic 149.736 0.055 -0.22 -0.065 23.468 3.717
470 Berrier LinStatic 29.91 -0.15 -0.073 0.265 8.524 -10.093
470 DW LinStatic 18.363 0.012 -0.046 -0.031 5.638 0.839
470 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 411.332 6.08 12.917 90.126 1414.473 585.704
470 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 147.532 -6.098 -13.835 -90.195 -1332.534 -586.839
470 Str-I8 Combination Max 332.847 5.923 11.479 64.25 937.667 576.804
470 Str-I8 Combination Min 147.532 -6.041 -12.179 -66.497 -856.668 -584.32
472 DEAD LinStatic 152.641 3.212E-09 -0.219 2.528E-08 23.496 2.905E-07
472 Berrier LinStatic 19 -0.00001085 -0.052 -0.000005772 6.936 -0.001068
472 DW LinStatic 19.331 -2.591E-11 -0.048 -1.08E-09 5.754 -2.52E-09
472 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 409.846 6.592 13.628 90.093 1359.218 616.41
472 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 165.957 -6.592 -14.534 -90.093 -1276.422 -616.412
472 Str-I8 Combination Max 275.217 6.484 8.001 65.634 732.505 610.773
472 Str-I8 Combination Min 166.77 -6.484 -8.625 -65.634 -666.12 -610.774
474 DEAD LinStatic 149.736 -0.055 -0.22 0.065 23.468 -3.717
474 Berrier LinStatic 29.911 0.15 -0.073 -0.265 8.524 10.091
474 DW LinStatic 18.363 -0.012 -0.046 0.031 5.638 -0.839
474 StrIGroup1 Combination Max 411.332 6.098 12.917 90.195 1414.473 586.836
474 StrIGroup1 Combination Min 147.532 -6.08 -13.835 -90.126 -1332.534 -585.705
474 Str-I8 Combination Max 332.847 6.041 11.479 66.497 937.667 584.318
474 Str-I8 Combination Min 147.532 -5.923 -12.179 -64.25 -856.667 -576.806
478 DEAD LinStatic 149.947 0.051 3.606 -0.406 -670.913 3.488
478 Berrier LinStatic 29.326 -0.118 -0.673 3.939 133.531 -8.107
17
Table 6.3: Joint Displacement
18
Table 6.4: Modal Periods and Frequencies
19
7. CONCLUSION:
We as a group concluded this Complex Engineering Problem with the Modelling and Bridge
Analysis results using CSI Bridge softwere, based on the values of maximum effects from
three major structural analysis parameters, i.e
Deflections
Moments
Shear Stress
And influence line diagram
The Deformation and Moments were analyzed on the whole for the bridge with respect to
time history ,dead load,truck load and tank load. Similarly, Shear Stresses were analyzed
individually for time history,Dead load ,tank load ,truck load and shear stress due to combo
of all spans collectively.
Thus, we get the critical values and the critical locations for all the parameters which are
necessary for design and hence, it concluded our assigned work.
20