Art Appreciation
Art Appreciation
5. DANCE
F – FORCE (energy/grace) 1. SUBJECT MATTER AND THE MIMETIC
T – TIME APPROACH
Sp – SPACE • The subject matter can be representational
or nonpresentational. With respect to
6. THEATER ARTS subject matter, art is an imitation, depiction
S – Script / Text or representation of some aspect of nature
P – Production or life. The approach to art criticism through
P – Process (Page to Stage) subject matter is called mimetic (derived
A – Audience from the Greek ‘mimesis,’ meaning
imitation). The mimetic approach stresses
7. FILM / CINEMA ARTS the importance of subject matter or content
Th – THEME in the art.
P – PLOT 2. ARTIST (WRITER/CREATOR) AND THE
S – STORY OR SCREENPLAY EXPRESSIVE APPROACH
A – ACTING • From the point of view of the artist, art is a
C & M – COSTUME & MAKE-UP means of expression, a medium for
S – SOUND communicating an idea, an emotion or
M – MUSIC some other human experience, an
C – CINEMATOGRAPHY impression of life, a vision of beauty. The
D – DIRECTING expressive approach of art criticism
stresses the relationship of the artwork to conveyed the artwork. a. Qualify and study
its creator. In this approach, the artist carefully the quality of the elements in the
3. AUDIENCE/READERS AND THE art b. Assess how each basic element
PRAGMATIC APPROACH contribute to the mood, meaning and
• himself becomes the major element overall beauty of the artwork
generating both the artistic product and the STEP 3. INTERPRETATION (INTERPRET THE
norms by which the work is to be judged. MEANING OF THE ART)
• One aspect of art, which is of importance to • This is a more subjective part of the
the audience, is its value, function or critique. It is expected that to use technical
significance. Aside from its aesthetic value, aspects of the art in applying supposition to
art can have other values: religious, the artist’s intended purpose for the
philosophical, moral, historical, political, artwork. Try to accomplish the following
social, scientific, commercial, sentimental, things when formulating your interpretation:
practical, etc. Pragmatic approach a. Communicate the artist’s statement.
emphasizes the value and importance of Describe what you think the artist is
art and its audience. This attach little trying to say through the work of art (or
importance to the aesthetic value and the meaning and/or your interpretation)
instead judge art according to how useful it b. Expound on the mood or the feeling that
is to the audience. is conveyed by the artwork. Describe
4. FORM AND THE FORMALIST/AESTHETIC what the artwork means to you and why
APPROACH c. Explain what you feel is the artist’s
• With respect to form, the art is a intended purpose for creating that
composition, a whole consisting of various particular work of art.
parts or elements; the selection, d. Examine why the artist made the choices
organization, and integration of these in technique, materials, and subject
elements according to certain formal matter and how they relate to the
principles and employing certain intended purpose.
techniques constitute that which we call the e. Identify the symbols in the artwork and
form of art. “Art for art’s sake,” coined by describe how they relate to the artist’s
English playwright, Oscar Wilde. This view execution and the artwork itself
seeks to liberate art from the chains of STEP 4. JUDGMENT (EVALUATE THE
morality, religion, political propaganda and ARTWORK)
social reform, and sets up art as something • This is the summation of the art criticism
worthy of appreciation for its own sake. process. After your analysis and
interpretation, this is the part where the
HOW TO CRITIQUE ARTWORKS critic needs to draw conclusions and decide
STEP 1. DESCRIPTION (DESCRIBE WHAT for the quality/value of that artwork.
YOU SEE/EXPERIENCE) a. Review your analysis and interpretation.
• This is the objective portion of the art b. State what is the value of the artwork.
critique. It involves a technical description, c. Describe the artwork’s relevance to the
basic form and elements of the art; this art community and to the humanity
includes: d. Explain where you feel the artwork has a
a. Artist’s name strong value and where you think it falls
b. Title of the artwork short.
c. Type of the artwork
d. Subject (central figure and other ART CRITICISM AND APPLICATION OF
objects you see) CRITICAL THEORIES
e. Elements (review the elements of art
because this depends on the form) FRANKFURT SCHOOL: CHALLENGING
f. First impression (outstanding and/or IDEOLOGIES
disagreeable qualities of the art) • The Frankfurt School is the name given to
STEP 2. ANALYSIS (ANALYZE THE a group of German intellectuals associated
ARTWORK) with the Institute for Social Research at the
• This is the in-depth examination of how the University of Frankfurt.
technical elements were utilized by the • The Institute was established in 1923.
artist to create the overall impression ‘Critical Theory’ is the name given to the
Institute’s critical mix of Marxism and
psychoanalysis.
• The academic influence of the critical
method is far reaching. Some of the key
issues and philosophical preoccupations of
the School involve the critique of modernity
and capitalist society, the definition of
social emancipation, as well as the
detection of the pathologies of society.
• Critical Theory provides a specific
interpretation of Marxist philosophy with
regards to some of its central economic
and political notions like commodification,
reification, fetishization and critique of
mass culture (Corradetti, 2020).
One good example of challenging ideologies is
of Coco Chanel’s breakthrough in fashion DECONSTRUCTION: REVERSING SIDES
industry: • Deconstruction involves close reading/
examining the text or the work of art in
order to demonstrate that any given art has
irreconcilably contradictory meaning,
rather than being a unified, logical whole.
• It was both created and has been
profoundly influenced by the French
philosopher Jacques Derrida. Through
deconstruction, Derrida aims to erase the
boundary between binary oppositions –
and to do so in such a way that the
hierarchy implied by the oppositions is
thrown into question (Mambrol, 2015)