HOW TO USE DATA

FAIRWAYS
TO IMPROVE
IN REG 7 Data Articles on
Game Improvement
SEASON
42%

AVERAGE DRIVER DISTANCE

237 YDS
USAGE 28%

Case studies using

the Shot Scope system.
Introduction
The data for the articles in this book are provided by
Shot Scope. Shot Scope are the innovators of the first
ever golf watch with both GPS and Performance Tracking
combined in one device.

Article 1 The anatomy of a 3 putt

Article 2 Shot Scope user Rob
Article 3 George’s poor greenside play
Article 4 Helping Tom make better club choices
Article 5 Improving Ian’s short game
Article 6 Is the new driver worth the $500 investment
Article 7 Why am I 3 putting so often?

Shot Scope V3
Shot Scope V3 provides the golfer with GPS distances, easily
accessible on their wrist, as well as an automatic shot tracking
system. Hundreds of performance statistics are available to analyze
on the performance dashboard or mobile app post-round.

The GPS watch tracks swings that don’t result in

contact, which leads to some interesting statistics.
For example, did you know that on average,
golfers take 2 practice swings before hitting
a real shot?

shotscope.com | 2
 Article 1 The Anatomy Of A 3-Putt
This article takes a fresh look at the anatomy of a 3-putt. Not only will it look at
the rate at which golfers 3-putt, but it will examine what’s been dubbed as ‘The
Previous Shot Effect’. It’s a fascinating concept that delves into the physical
impact of a poor first putt and how that influences subsequent attempts.

Graph 1 shows the 3-putt percentage at different handicap levels. Graph 2 shows the average 2nd putt distance
left (the distance remaining to the hole after the first putt) on holes that result in a 3-putt.

It makes you wonder why golfers spend so much time on the range instead of on the putting green.
Eliminating 3-putts entirely, while no simple task, would shave 4.25 shots off a 25 handicapper’s average score.

Avg distance of 2nd Putt

3 Putt % when 3 putt made
0 7.8% 0 4.5ft
5 9.5% 5 5.6ft
Handicap

Handicap
10 11.8% 10 6ft
15 14.2% 15 8.6ft
20 19.1% 20 9.2ft
25 24.5% 25 11.2ft
Graph 1 Graph 2

OBSERVATIONS: OBSERVATIONS:
• Scratch golfers 3-putt less frequently than • It’s likely that longer 2nd putt distances are due
higher handicap golfers. This isn’t particularly to poor distance control, so it makes sense that
surprising. the average 2nd putt distance increases with
handicap.
• Scratch golfers 3-putt 7.8% of the time;
higher than you’d maybe expect. • Shot Scope believes there’s a misunderstanding
about what constitutes a good lag putt. The data
• The difference in the rate of 3-putts widens
suggests golfers should be happy when they hit
as handicaps increase.
their first putt to within 4 or 5 feet of the hole.
• 25 handicap golfers 3-putt nearly 25%
of the time.

NOTE: WHILE NOT INCLUDED IN THE

CHARTS, IT’S WORTH NOTING THAT 83%
OF ALL 3-PUTTS HAVE A FIRST PUTT
DISTANCE OF GREATER THAN 32FT.

shotscope.com | 3
 Article 1 Cont... The previous shot effect
The following series of charts detail what Shot Scope terms the Previous Shot
Effect. It’s a really interesting take on how the result of the previous shot impacts
the one that follows. To a degree, it examines the psychological reaction to a poor
shot and concludes that a bad first effort on the green may lead to a poor mindset
that ultimately reduces the likelihood of making the next putt.

0-5 Handicap KEY: 16-25 Handicap KEY:

From off the green From off the green
95
95

100 Was a 1st Putt 100 Was a 1st Putt

85

90 90

79
84

77
74
80 80

68
67

70 70
66
Make %

Make %
60 60
41

50 50
39

35
40 40
32

29
30

26
30 30

14
20 20
10 10

8
3
0 0
0-2ft 3-4ft 5-6ft 7-8ft 9-10ft 0-2ft 3-4ft 5-6ft 7-8ft 9-10ft

The 0-5 chart (above) serves primarily as a OBSERVATIONS:

reference. The data suggest that, for better
• While the make percentages drop at every
golfers, there’s almost no difference in the make
distance compared to the previous chart, the
percentage following a shot that originated from
Previous Shot Effect is relatively consistent with
off the green (an approach shot) and one that
the previous group.
originated from on the green (putt).
• This suggests that part of becoming a better
player is letting go of bad shots before the effect
6-15 Handicap KEY: the next shot.
From off the green
100 Was a 1st Putt
87

90 THE TAKEAWAY
81
77

80
72

70 Even within a group that contains a majority of

above average players, the Previous Shot Effect
Make %

60
is pronounced.
50
41
34

40 The last two graphs highlight the importance of the

26

30 1st putt on a green, especially from distance, and how

20

20 quickly/easily shots can be lost. It also hints at the

11

10 importance of having a short memory.

4

0
0-2ft 3-4ft 5-6ft 7-8ft 9-10ft It’s entirely possible that a bad attitude is contributing
to missed putts.
OBSERVATIONS:
Given how make percentages decrease significantly
• From within 2 feet, there’s a 6 percentage point
with distance, whether it’s through practice or putter
difference favoring putts that followed approach
technology, the Shot Scope data suggests that
shots vs putts that followed another putt.
improving lag putt distance control will ultimately
• At distances of 9-10 feet, the make percentage lead to better scores and a lower handicap.
following a shot that originated on the green is
less than half of what it is following a shot that
originated from off the green.

shotscope.com | 4
Article 2 Shot Scope user Rob
The general overview of Rob’s game indicates that each aspect of his game is in
need of a little sharpening up. Therefore we will break down each aspect of his
game to try and identify an area for Rob to focus on.

Number of putts Approach proximity

AVG SCORE per round within 200 yards

V PAR +22.74 38.7 104.9ft

Fairway Success Green Success Holes per 3 putt Short Game Avg Proximity

36% 18% 13.4 21.07ft

Rob
AVG DRIVING DISTANCE: 223 YARDS
Handicap: 17

One area of Rob’s game which jumps out significantly is his average proximity to the hole within
210yards; 104.9ft (35yards). If Rob could hit his approaches closer he would most likely reduce the
number of shots it takes him to play the hole.

Fairway Approach Proximity to hole Rough Approach Proximity to hole

AGV
82.6 ft
AGV
127.6 ft

Breaking this down further, we can see that Rob hits it closer when he approaches the green from the fairway.
Fairway approach proximity to hole 82.62ft, rough approach proximity to hole 127.61ft. There is over 40ft
difference in proximity between hitting out the rough compared to hitting from the fairway.

PENALTY SHOTS BY CLUB

TOTAL: 31 DRIVER: 15 OTHER COMBINED: 16

Rob’s fairway success rate is low, at 36%. As we already outlined, Rob hits more greens when he is on the
fairway. Therefore, if Rob can hit more fairways a round he should subsequently hit more greens, which will
also improve his proximity to the hole. Further investigation into Rob’s tee shots highlights that Rob only hits
driver off the tee, this may be because he doesn’t hit the ball that far. However over the 25 rounds analysed,
Rob has incurred 31 penalty shots, (15 of those because of his driver) as well as numerous positional shots to
get back in play. Rob should work on keeping his driver in play, or on the shorter holes, hit an alternative club
off the tee.

shotscope.com | 5
Article 2 Cont...
Short Game Proximity Eagle Birdie Par Bogey D.Bogey+

37.1% 31.3% 29.1%

45.7% 38.3% 49.5%

16.4% 28.1% 20.4%

Left Fairway Right

The total score breakdown also indicates that hitting the fairway saves Rob shots. Rob makes double or
worse 45.7% of the time when in the left rough and 49.5% of the time when in the right rough. Compared to the
28.1% when he hits the fairway. It can also be noted that the most birdies have happened when Rob has hit
the fairway off the tee. Therefore, Rob’s main focus on course should be on hitting the fairway off the tee. This
could require a slight change in technique, more practice with the driver or a different thought process when
standing on the tee.

Average Green Success from Fairway Average Green Success from Rough
100 100
90 90
80 80
70
AGV 70
60
23.4% 60 AGV
50 50 13.3%
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0

7i 8i 9i Pw Sw Lw 7i 8i 9i Pw Sw Lw

This will contribute to why his greens in regulation is so low at only 18%. Green success rate looks at the
success of all approaches aiming to hit the green (i.e. not a positional shot). Analysing the green success rate
in further detail outlines that Rob hits 23% of greens from the fairway and only 13% of greens from the rough.
Although both stats are low, it might be that Rob cannot reach some of the par 4s in two or is having to play
positional shots instead – not unusual for a mid handicap. Nonetheless, Rob manages to hit 10% more greens
from the fairway than the rough, which is a significant amount.

THE TAKEAWAY
Aim to hit more fairways, which will reduce the
number of penalty shots taken, which should then
lead to more greens hit. Then hopefully Rob will
build confidence and will start to hit them closer
to the pin. Ultimately all of this combined will lead
to a reduction in Rob’s overall score.

shotscope.com | 6
Article 3 George’s Poor Greenside Play
George is a long-time user of both Shot Scope V1 and V2. George happened to play
with a member of the Shot Scope team at an event.

George mentioned his scoring and handicap had climbed from 4 to 6 over the past year and that he couldn’t pinpoint
the cause. George hadn’t made any significant swing changes although he did change his wedge set up.

In 2017, using Shot Scope helped George identify poor gapping with his PW, 49°, and 56° wedges. This season, George
altered his wedge set up to use a PW, 50°, 54° and 58° instead. The Shot Scope team decided to work with George on
a case study to see if they could identify a cause for the increased handicap.

Number of putts Approach proximity

AVG SCORE per round within 200 yards

V PAR +6.58 29.2 56ft

Fairway Success Green Success Holes per 3 putt Short Game Avg Proximity

64% 51% 25 14.29ft

George
AVG DRIVING DISTANCE: 233 YARDS
Handicap: 6

George’s game overview shows he is now a 6 handicap, and his general game is in a good state. George
mentioned that he plays 4/5 times a week (he is retired) at different courses and in competitions. He doesn’t hit
the ball too far, but with 64% fairway success he is accurate with the Driver. With no obvious red flags, the team
decided to look at George’s wedges, since that is the only change he has made.

Average Wedge Distances

As you can see from the Shot Scope V2 data, George’s gapping has improved with the new wedge set-
up. When he added the extra club, George removed his 4-iron, which he hardly used since he carries a 23°
hybrid. This was definitely the correct decision for George, and it’s great to see the difference between his
2017 and 2018 distances.

2017 Wedge Avg Distances 2018 Wedge Avg Distances

Pw 114 Pw 115

49 96 50 92

56 73 54 78

58 67

shotscope.com | 7
Article 3 Cont...
Short Game Performance Club Proximity to hole Up + Down Usage
When looking into George’s short-game
performance data, we found something P 7.6 ft 78% 22%
intriguing. George uses a lot of clubs around the
green, playing predominantly at a links course
there should be a lot of chip and runs. He has 58° 16.92 ft 48% 31%
a poor proximity to hole average with his 50°,
54°, 58° and 23° hybrid. Those clubs account for 54° 15.97 ft 31% 18%
64% of his greenside shots. It’s possible there
could be a bias towards using the new wedges
at an increased frequency, and the inaccuracy 50° 19.25 ft 24% 11%
could boil down to a lack of practice with the
new lofts. There are obvious reasons to use Pw 13.62 ft 55% 3%
high-lofted wedges around the greens; e.g., out
of bunkers or other situations where obstacles
must be carried, but on true links courses like
9i 14.16 ft 60% 3%
the ones George plays, he could play more chip
and runs. There is little reason to use the hybrid 8i 9.03 ft 74% 8%
as the data suggests that George is not very
good with this shot. H23 19.91 ft 33% 4%
Avg: 14.58 ft 50%

Short Game Potential Club Proximity to hole Up + Down Usage

We sent George an example of what his short
game could look like if he decided to use specific P 7.6 ft 78% 30%
clubs for short game shots, and how without
changing technique, he could improve his scoring.
We are aware that there will still be an occasional 58° 16.92 ft 48% 16%
need to use high-lofted clubs around the green, but
most golfers can benefit from lofting down around 54° 15.97 ft 31% 10%
the green.

Not only could George improve his average

50°
proximity to the hole by 1.7 feet, but he could also
potentially get up and down 8% more often. Pw 13.62 ft 55% 13%
Showing George the potential performance of
his short game should encourage him to loft
9i 14.16 ft 60% 13%
down around the greens and ultimately lower his
handicap. George may not be able to resist using 8i 9.03 ft 74% 18%
the higher lofted clubs around the green, but that is
the goal. H23

Avg: 12.88 ft 58%

THE TAKEAWAY
George should attempt to use his putter, PW, 9i, and 8i more around the greens and not to use the H23 or 50 at
all. George should monitor his stats to see if can attain the potential usages per club and maintain the up and
down ratios.

shotscope.com | 8
Article 4 Helping Tom make better club choices
Tom is a 13 handicap golfer who has a well-rounded game, his 2018 overall
statistics show that he is a steady player. Tom approached Shot Scope and
asked us to investigate his stats as he was struggling to pinpoint where his
weaknesses were.

Number of putts Approach proximity

AVG SCORE per round within 200 yards

V PAR +12.4 32 89ft

Fairway Success Green Success Up + Down Short Game Avg Proximity

41% 39% 43% 14ft

Tom
AVG DRIVING DISTANCE: 234 YARDS
Handicap: 13

Tom has a Green Success rate of 39% and leaves

72.5% of approaches short of the pin, with 50.6% of
Club Choice 9 iron V 8 iron
these completely short of the green. Rather than this 162

being a complicated fix, the data suggests that Tom AVG

160 yards
simply needs to pick his club more carefully. P-AVG

150
Approaches
150 yards

6% 4.6%

142 yards
139

8.5% 8.3% DANGER

126 yards

ZONE

10.5% 11.4%

23% 27.6%
9i 8i

Perhaps this means taking one more club than normal,

Breakdown to hit the green, or to ensure he gets it to the pin.
Focussing on the back of the green distance would
ensure that Tom selects the appropriate club and
Looking at Tom’s statistics we can see that he has leaves fewer shots short of the green. In this example,
good distance gapping with his clubs. Shot Scope’s if Tom was to hit a 9 iron, i.e. to the middle of the green
Performance Average removes all outlier shots (good yardage, his average and performance average show
and bad) to give the golfer a true representation of the that he would end up in the danger zone at the front of
distance a well struck golf shot travels. The 30 yard the green. This is why Tom should hit one more club,
gap between Tom’s average of 234 and performance his 8 iron.
average of 264 suggests that he struggles with swing
consistency with his Driver. Shot Scope data reveals that 72% of danger is at
the front of the green whereas only 28% at the back.
Therefore, missing long is 99% of the time, less of a
Driver Distances problem than missing short. Tom, gets ‘Up & Down’ 43%
of the time, which is very steady for a 13 handicapper,
D AVG 234yds considering the best PGA Tour players get ‘Up & Down’
70% of the time.
D P-AVG 264yds
shotscope.com | 9
Article 4 Cont...
Short Game Statistics
Chipping is one of Tom’s strengths, his average proximity from his short game is 14ft, but Tom is reliant on this to
keep his score down. If Tom was to start hitting the correct club for his distance to the back of the green, he would
start hitting more greens and wouldn’t have to try and get ‘Up & Down’ as often.

Up + Down % V Tour Pro’s Short Game Proximity

100
90
80
70
70%
Make %

60
50 43%
40
30
20
10
0
TOM TOUR PROS
AGV
14 ft

Driver Distance THE TAKEAWAY

Comparison Club Distances Tom needs to hit more greens from the
fairway, so he is not reliant on his short game.
Tom has committed to playing to the back
D1 AVG 234yds <30yds> of green distance, to try and increase the
number of greens hit per round.
D1 P-AVG 264yds
Tom has informed us he has a new Driver
(Taylormade M3 with Twist Face Technology,
D2 AVG 251yds <17yds> 10.5 degree, Fujikura Atmos shaft) to try and
sort out his distance inconsistency. After
playing 8 rounds his Average Driving Distance
D2 P-AVG 268yds is now 251yards and Performance Average is
268 yards.

shotscope.com | 10
Article 5 Improving Ian’s Short Game
This article is about Ian, a 16 handicapper who doesn’t hit many greens and
suffers from a poor short game proximity. Hitting greens, or if you can’t reach
the green, chipping close is key to keeping your score down, or close to your
handicap.
Number of putts Approach proximity
AVG SCORE per round within 200 yards

V PAR +18.7 33.4 101ft

Fairway Success Green Success Up + Down Short Game Avg Proximity

32% 27% 12% 21ft

Ian
AVG DRIVING DISTANCE: 218 YARDS
Handicap: 16

Tee Shot Dispersion

Ian struggles with a slice, which is highlighted by his
high percentage of right misses 57%, but has also been
confirmed by him. Even his drives on the fairway favour
the right side as can be seen in the image on the right.

He loses distance due to his slice and subsequently,

will struggle to reach some of the longer Par 4s in two
or three shots. The image above shows, Ian’s tee shots
that hit the fairway go further than the ones that are in
the right rough. A slice is something he will always play
with, as he doesn’t have the time to change. Ian could
change his aim point to help reduce the damage of his
slice. If he aims further left, and still slices it, the shots
will finish on the fairway more often.

Ian’s Current Ian’s Suggested However, what could help him

Aim Point New Aim Point lower his score, is if he focussed
his efforts on chipping and
putting, with greater emphasis on
chipping. On his best day, Ian got
‘up and down’ 48% of the time, to
shoot a round of 83 – this is a very
25yds
rare occurrence, as highlighted by
his season average of 12%.

Up + Down %
Thick rough
and trees

KEY:
225 yards

FAIRWAY
LIGHT ROUGH
BUNKER
TARGET LINE MOVED
25 YARDS LEFT

shotscope.com | 11
Article 5 Cont... Club Usage Short Game
7i 61%
Short Game Proximity
Shot Scope defines any shot under 50 yards within the 9i 1%
pin, as a short game shot, and Ian hits 27% of greens
so will be left with many short game shots in a round of
golf. Ian’s average proximity to the hole from his short
Pw 2%
game shots is 21ft with only 16% of his short game
inside 6ft (also referred to as the Red Zone on the Shot Sw 6%
Scope dashboard).
AGV Lw 8%
21 ft

P 22%
Ian’s short game statistics show, he uses his 7 iron most
frequently. This high percentage shows he is comfortable
with this club, but it limits the type of shots he could play.
For example, when short sided behind a bunker, a high
lofted wedge shot is more appropriate. Ian’s statistics
drop even lower when he uses his lob wedge around the
green, as seen in the image below.

All Shots Red Zone

Short Game Proximity
Up + Down AGV
18 ft
For Ian to get ‘up and down’ and reduce his score, he AGV
29 ft
needs to be chipping inside 6ft more frequently. Ian’s
putting stats show; he makes 78% of 6ft or less putts,
whereas he only converts 8% of putts from 18-24ft.
Therefore focussing on chipping inside the 6ft circle
will ultimately lead to fewer shots per round.

Putting >6ft V 18-24ft

100 Make % from >6ft = 78% 7 Iron Lob Wedge
90
80
Make % from 18-24ft = 8% So how does Ian reduce his overall proximity? When it
comes to short game there are many variants on shot
70 type and club choice. Keep it simple and stick to what
Make %

60 works best but have the ability to use the other clubs
50 as required.
40
30
20 THE TAKEAWAY
10
0 A simple suggestion for Ian is to get to the course
>6ft 18-24ft
20mins earlier than usual (as this is all the practice
time he has) and just spend some time chipping onto
Distance the practice green, with both his 7 iron and lob wedge.
This will not only improve his skill level but will greatly
PGA Tour players average a short game proximity of enhance Ian’s confidence knowing that if he misses the
7ft. If Ian can reduce his short game proximity to even green he has a greater chance of getting it inside that
15ft (10ft ideally), he will have more shots finishing vital ‘red zone’.
inside that vital 6ft (red zone). This will greatly enhance
his chances of getting ‘up and down’ or saving par/ If Ian can hit that 15ft average proximity target he is
bogey. Should Ian be able to reduce his average much more likely to start playing to his 16 handicap
proximity to 15ft he would be able to save on average again. If he can reduce it further to 10ft, he may even
2 shots per round. start to shoot lower than his handicap!

shotscope.com | 12
Article 6 Is the new driver worth
the $500 investment?
One of Shot Scope’s golfers decided enough was enough and they should
invest in a new driver for the golf season. The purpose of this is not to enhance
a specific club or brand but to discuss and show the merits in custom fitting
and understanding performance data.
The question posed to Shot Scope: Was the $500 investment worth it?

Firstly, about the driver change. The original driver (Driver_Old) was from a well known brand and purchased new
in 2009, it had an extra stiff shaft with 9 degrees loft. The new driver (Driver_New) is actually the newest release
from the same brand and has an extra stiff shaft with 10.5 degrees loft.

Driver_Old Driver_New Gain (+/-)

Clubhead Speed 99 107 + 8 mph
(mph)

Distance
(yards) 267 293 + 26 yards
Table 1 Launch Monitor Data from Driver Fitting

During the fitting process, multiple drivers and shafts were tested. Driver_New was found to go on average 26
yards further (using a Launch Monitor) than Driver_Old.

Discussing with the golfer, he said that he felt he was playing better with the new Driver and had lowered his
handicap from 8.8 to 7.2 already this year but attributed that improvement to other areas of his game.
Looking through his Shot Scope performance data:

Driver_Old Driver_New Gain (+/-)

Number of Rounds 48 (2018) 12 (2019) n/a
Average Distance
(yards) 227 244 + 17 yards
P-Avg Distance 263 274 + 11 yards
(yards)

Longest
(yards)
352 334 - 18 yards

Driver Usage
% 22% 27% + 5%
Table 2 Shot Scope Driver Statistics

It is obvious to see that Driver_New is longer than Driver_Old, using Average Distance it is 17 yards longer and if we
look at P-Avg (Performance Average) it is only 11 yards longer.

*Shot Scope recommend users refer to their P-Avg Distance (Performance Average) as it removes all outliers good
and bad, to give the user a true representation of how far they hit a good shot.

shotscope.com | 13
Article 6 Cont...
This isn’t the 26 yards we are looking for from his fitting, but there is a caveat to this performance data. In 2018
summer golf in the UK was played on unusually hard and fast conditions creating some long drives such as his
longest at 352 yards.

The main takeaway from his distance statistics is the consistency. Driver_Old had a 36 yard difference between
average and performance average, whereas Driver_New has reduced that difference to 30 yards. Not only is
Driver_New longer, it has better distance consistency as well.

This unsurprisingly has created an increase of confidence with Driver_New, resulting in a higher usage % of 27%
compared to Driver_Old’s 22%. The question is, has this resulted in more fairways being hit, well yes!

Driver_Old Driver_New Difference (+/-)

Left Miss 24% 31% + 7%

Fairways Hit 38% 45% + 7%

Right Miss 38% 24% - 14%

Table 3 Shot Scope Driver Accuracy

We can see from his Shot Scope performance statistics that he has now increased his fairways hit % to 45%,
up 7% from Driver_Old. As well as hitting more fairways he has minimised his right miss by 14%, now down to
24% with Driver_New.

Looking into this further we discover that his misses are infact smaller misses with Driver_New.

Driver_Old Driver_New
Distance from
Fairway (Yards) 16.2 11.7
Table 4 Shot Scope Distance from Fairway

His average non-fairway hit with Driver_New is only 11.7 yards from the fairway whereas with Driver_Old it was
5 yards more off-line at 16.2 yards.

With the help of understanding performance statistics from Shot Scope, we can conclude that Driver_New is
longer, more consistent and more accurate off the tee than Driver_Old, but the following question is, did the
new driver lower his scoring?

The next area to look into is his approach shots:

2018 2019 Difference (+/-)

210 yards and
in proximity 83.74 ft 56.46 ft - 27.28 ft
150 yards and
in proximity 57.60 ft 33.39 ft - 24.21 ft

Greens in Regulation 38% 60% + 22%

Table 5 Shot Scope Approach Statistics

shotscope.com | 14
Article 6 Cont...
He has increased his Greens in Regulation by a massive 22% in 2019. Not only this, but he is hitting the ball
considerably closer to the pin compared with last year – over 20ft closer! There is no doubt that this is due to
him hitting more fairways and being more accurate off the tee with Driver_New. Subsequently, leaving himself
better approach shot positions, with more approaches from fairways and less from a long way offline.

As the golfer mentioned he has lowered his handicap and Shot Scope statistics shows this with his scoring
improvements.

2018 2019 Difference (+/-)

Average Score V Par + 11.45 + 7.74 - 3.71

Par 4 Scoring 4.74 4.51 - 0.23

Par 5 Scoring 5.42 5.04 - 0.38

Table 6 Shot Scope Scoring Statistics

Total round scoring has improved by 3.71 shots, with Par 4 and Par 5 scoring both improving due to his better
driving and subsequent approach performance.

A great way to show that the improvement can be attributed to Driver_New is through the fact that his Par 3
scoring has remained static.

2018 2019
Par 3 Scoring 3.64 3.68
Table 7 Shot Scope Par 3 Scoring

THE TAKEAWAY
It is evident that custom fitting can improve scoring, it should be noted that this case is dramatic as there was
a 10-year gap in the technology of the Drivers.

Most importantly one Shot Scope user can sleep soundly knowing their $500 investment was worthwhile and
can be even more confident in using his Driver to find more fairways.

Understanding Shot Scope performance statistics can help provide a golfer with better knowledge of where
they can improve their game, alongside allowing them to see any changes over the years just as in this
example. Knowing how to analyze and understand statistics of this type can be hugely beneficial to your game.

shotscope.com | 15
 Article 7 Why am I 3 Putting so often?
David approached Shot Scope at the Scottish Golf Show in March, and asked
us to dig deeper into his statistics. He is an 18 handicap golfer who feels he is
a good putter but doesn’t understand why his stats show him 3 putting nearly
3 times per round (every 7.8 holes).

Number of putts Number of 2 putts

AVG SCORE per round per green

V PAR +21.1 32.9 62%

Fairway Success Green Success Up + Down Holes per 3 putt

35% 24% 29% 7.8

David
AVG DRIVING DISTANCE: 259 YARDS
Handicap: 18

With the number of 3 putts David has per round it is Number of putts per green
evident that we need to look into his long putting, as 1 Putts 2 Putts 3 Putts
it could be severely letting him down. The Shot Scope
performance dashboard provides an excellent platform
to break down your stats in lots of detail. 24% 62% 13%

Looking at the putting statistic ‘Average Proximity to Avg. Holes per 3 putt = 7.8
Hole’, we can see that David is simply not hitting his
first put close enough, with an average proximity to
the hole of 4.9ft from 18-24ft putts, 7.9ft from 24-30ft
putts and over 10ft from over 30ft putts.

Avg Proximity to hole

12
10
8
6
ft

4
2
0
0-6ft 6-12ft 12-18ft 18-24ft 24-30ft 30+ft
Starting Distance

To understand Shot Scope putting statistics properly,

it benefits to know that poor long range putting means
you should look into your approach shots and the
proximity of those shots. If you do not hit it close
enough to the pin then you are leaving yourself in 3 putt
territory. After analysing David’s statistics we can see
that it is infact his approach proximity to the hole that Approach play and approach proximity come hand-
needs to improve. in-hand with fairway success. Hit more fairways = hit
more greens and David’s stats prove this. He hits more
than DOUBLE the number of greens from the fairway
than he does from the rough. 34% success from the
fairway with only 12% from the rough. The mobile
phone image shows this statistic displayed on Shot
Scope’s mobile app.

shotscope.com | 16
Article 7 Cont...
Hitting the fairway more often should enable David to increase his green success percentage but also
reduce his average proximity from the hole, which is currently over 150ft for all approach shots (50-350
yards). The Shot Scope performance dashboard allows you to filter by shot distance and when we filter
David’s approach shot distance to 50-210 yards, his average proximity reduces to 89ft. This is a massive
jump in proximity from 150ft to 89ft.

Approach Proximity (50-210 yards) Approach Proximity (50-350 yards)

All Shots All Shots
AGV
89 ft
AGV
>150 ft

So why is this the case? With the distance David currently hits his H13 and 3 wood, he will be unable to hit or
reach the green from anywhere over 220 yards from the green. Unless David is able to increase the distance he
hits these clubs we recommend that he does not attempt to reach the green and merely leaves himself in the
best pace possible for his next shot.

Club Distance THE TAKEAWAY

3w 188yds Going forward, if David wants to improve he should

focus on his approach play first. If David works on his
approach shots, and manages to hit them closer to the
H13 202yds hole, he will give himself the best possible chance of 1
or 2 putting. As a second focus, David should practice
4i 200yds his pace putting for long range putts by doing some
drills before he goes out to play.
5i 181yds
Long Putting Drill: Take 3 balls and pick a putt about
30-40ft. Aim to hit the first ball past the hole (no more
Top Tip: All shots that you will not be able than 3ft), hit the second ball short of the hole (no more
than 3ft) and then hit the last one dead weight. Repeat
to hit the green with due to the distance (i.e. a number of times before heading out to play.
over 220 yards in David’s case) should be
marked as ‘Positional Shots’. This removes Reducing the number of 3-putts was David aim,
but Shot Scope has allowed us to gain a deeper
these shots from your approach stats. understanding of the issue and proved that the best
solution to this is for David to spend time practicing his
approach shots first with a smaller focus on his long
putting. Not what you might think at first glance.

shotscope.com | 17
 Brand new GPS

The most advanced

GPS watch in Golf
GPS watch with Performance Tracking
Dual GPS accuracy
Includes automated performance tracking
Play 35K courses worldwide - no subscription
Conforms to the rules of golf
Lightweight and easy to use
Proven to reduce handicaps - 2.7 shots on average
Request course edits within 48 hours

Available in 5 colors

62
YARDS

129
YARDS

Buy Now at shotscope.com