MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and content within and observer agreement form/s done
Pedagogy across curriculum through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
teaching areas. person classroom observation.
(PPST 1.1.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in- person Efficiency
classes are not implemented,
1. through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session. Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s done
enhance learner through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
achievement in person classroom observation.
literacy and
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
numeracy skills. If onsite / face-to-face / in- person Efficiency
(PPST 1.4.2) classes are not implemented,
1. through observation of
synchronous / asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s done
develop critical through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
and creative person classroom observation.
thinking, as well
as other higher If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
order thinking classes are not implemented, Efficiency
skills. (PPST 1. through observation of
1.5.2) synchronous / asynchronous
teaching in other modalities;
or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session. Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement form/s done
of Learners engage learners, through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
individually or in person classroom observation.
groups, in
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
meaningful If onsite / face-to-face / in- person Efficiency
exploration, classes are not implemented,
discovery and 1. through observation of
hands-on synchronous / asynchronous
activities within a teaching in other modalities; or
range of physical 2. through observation of a
learning demonstration teaching* via LAC
environments. session. Timeliness
(PPST 2.3.2)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
and non-violent person classroom observation. Efficiency
discipline to
ensure learning- If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
focused classes are not implemented,
environments. 1. through observation of
(PPST 2.6.2) synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services developmentally observer agreement form/s done
appropriate through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
learning person classroom observation.
experiences to
address learners’ If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
gender, needs, classes are not implemented, Efficiency
strengths, 3. through observation of
interests and synchronous / asynchronous
experiences. teaching in other modalities; or
(PPST 3.1.2) through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session. Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services implemented observer agreement form/s done
developmentally through onsite / face-to-face/ in-
sequenced person classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite / face-to-face / in- person Efficiency
processes to classes are not implemented,
meet curriculum 1. through observation of
requirements and synchronous / asynchronous
varied teaching teaching in other modalities; or
contexts. 2. through observation of a
(PPST 4.1.2) demonstration teaching* via LAC
Timeliness
session.
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality
collegial sessions / FGDs / meetings /
discussions that other collegial discussions
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC sessions
learner feedback 3. / FGDs / meetings / other
to enrich teaching collegial discussions on use
practice. of teacher and learner
(PPST 4.4.2 feedback to enrich teaching
practice
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4. Reflection notes of teachers Efficiency
on their demonstration of
teaching practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs / meetings /
other collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance
5. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that Timeliness
highlights the objective
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services organized and observer agreement form/s done
used appropriate through onsite / face-to- face / in-
teaching and person classroom observation.
learning
resources, If onsite / face-to-face / in-
including ICT, to person classes are not
address learning implemented,
Efficiency
goals. 1. through observation of
(PPST 4.5.2) synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session. Timeliness
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and organized and observer agreement form/s done
Reporting used diagnostic, through onsite / face-to- face / in-
formative and person classroom observation.
summative
assessment If onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies person classes are not
Efficiency
consistent with implemented,
curriculum 1. through observation of
requirements. synchronous / asynchronous
(PPST 5.1.2) teaching in other modalities; or
2. through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session. Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner
Services progress and  Individual Learning Monitoring Plan
achievement (ILMP)
using learner  Peer assessment data
attainment data.  Sample of learners’ output with
(PPST 5.2.2) reflection / self- assessment Efficiency
 Progress charts/anecdotal records
 Class/e-class record/grading
sheets
 Lesson plans showing index of
mastery
Timeliness
 Frequency of errors with identified
least/most mastered skills
 Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective (e.g.,
Individual Learning Agreement
(ILA), ALS Assessment Form 2)
 Others (Please specify and provide
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
annotations)

Basic 12.Communicated Any one (1) of the following: Quality

Education promptly and
Services clearly the  A sample of corrected test paper of
learners’ needs, a learner in a learning area with
progress and parent’s or guardian’s signature
achievement to and date of receipt
key stakeholders,  Minutes of meetings with key Efficiency
including stakeholders (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
parents/guardians CPC) with proof of attendance
. (PPST 5.4.2).
 Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by minutes
of meeting
 Communication with key
stakeholders
(e.g.,parents/guardians, co-
Timeliness
teachers, LGU) using various
modalities
 Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
 Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective
 Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry that highlights Quality

Education Growth and personal the application of a learner- centered
Services Professional philosophy of teaching philosophy in the lesson plan or
Development teaching that is community work Efficiency
learner-centered.
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
(PPST 7.1.2) Timeliness

Basic 14. Set  Certification from the ICT Coordinator Quality

Education professional / School Head / Focal Person in
Services development charge of e- SAT Efficiency
goals based on  IPCRF-DP
the Philippine
 Mid-year Review Form (MRF) Timeliness
Professional
Standards for  Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
Teachers. (PPST
7.5.
Basic 5. Plus factor 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
Services works / activities ● committee involvement;
that contribute to ● involvement as module/learning
the teaching- material writer/validator;
learning process.
● involvement as a resource
person/speaker/learning facilitator in in Efficiency
the RO/SDO/school-initiated TV/radio-
based instruction;
● book or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in demonstration Timeliness
teaching;
● participation as research presenter in
a forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/in- service
teachers;
 Mid-year
Mid-year Review Rating Review
Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
KRA Rater (Master
Performan Ratee (Teacher)
Teacher)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● conducted research within the rating
period;
● others (please specify) with annotation
on how it contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority