Assign 01 Com2602 2018
Assign 01 Com2602 2018
STUDENT NO : 46829563
MODULE : COM2602
ASSIGNMENT : 01
UNIQUE NO : 838960
I, the undersigned, hereby declare that this is my own and personal work. Except
where the work(s) or publications of others have been acknowledge by means of
reference techniques.
I have read and understood Tutorial Letter CMNALLE/301 regarding technical and
presentation requirements, referencing techniques and plagiarism.
My name: LG Njonga
My student number: 46829563
Date; 19 March 2018
A witness name: T Ziwele
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction : Page 4
Question 2 : Page 6 - 7
Question 3 : Page 7 - 8
Question 4 : Page 9
Conclusion : Page 10
Self-assessment : Page 10
References : Page 11
4
INTRODUCTION
QUESTION 1
1.1
1.2
reversed; communication of strategy now takes place from the bottom up, changes
are made to operational strategy, followed by changes to high-level strategies.
QUESTION 2
2.1
QUESTION 3
3.1
(b) Stakeholder focus: Quality relationships with all stakeholders help to avoid
sending conflicting messages to overlapping stakeholders or customers. Stakeholder
8
priorities change constantly for example during a merger the financial community
and employees might be the most important whereas during a crisis the media
become a critical stakeholder.
(d) Purposeful dialogue: Dialogue should be purposeful for both the organisation and
the target audiences. Interactivity is a form of integration. A balance between mass,
personalised and interactive media is necessary to enrich feedback. Facilitation of
customer feedback and dialogue ensure integration of the customer into the planning
and operations of the organisation.
(e) Corporate mission marketing: Incorporate the mission into all operations to
continually remind everyone what the organisation stands for. A mission programme
should be focused to develop a distinct presence rather than a fragmented one.
3.2
3.2.1 Uniformity model the whole organisation, its subsidiaries and its brands have
one identity. This model is mostly used in two situations. In the first, subsidiaries with
degrees of autonomy are portrayed with the same identity to convey the size of the
entire organisation.
3.2.2 Endorsement model subsidiaries have their own identities, while the parent
organisation’s identity is present in the background. This model is mostly used where
the parent organisation has a strong influence over the management and operation
of its subsidiaries. The link is established to endorse the association between the
subsidiary and parent organisation.
3.2.3 Variety model subsidiaries have their own identities with no evident connection
between each other or the parent organisation. Companies, their services and
products tend to be presented as a multitude of brands with different identities. This
model is usually applied where subsidiaries are viewed primarily as financial assets
and where there is little managerial involvement by the parent organisation.
9
QUESTION 4
4.1
(a) Two drivers with a corporate focus (relationship management, stakeholder focus).
(b) Four process drivers that represent operational process (strategic consistency,
purposeful interactivity, mission marketing and zero- based planning).
4.2
4.2.2 Output of integration there is a distinction to be made between output and the
outcomes of integration. This is in contrast to the view of Duncan and Moriarty who
believe that output refers to the results or effects of integrated marketing. Here
output is understood as the product of integrated communication while outcomes are
understood as the effects of those messages on stakeholder relationships. This
emphasis of output evaluation is on the consistency of the actual brand messages
rather than on the process behind developing them.
CONCLUSION
These chapters have illustrated how the communication can solve problems in the
organisations if it is used in the right way and it can also develop new processes and
products. These chapters may work well for organisations with both vast capital to
get behind a truly concerted effort to integrated marketing, advertising and public
relations or for firms that have very little monetary resources, and thus don’t have
entrenched departments for each discipline and could better afford the one voice.
Lastly newly formed organisations could benefit for the same reasons: lack of
entrenchment, limited funds and growth potential.
This was an eye opener, I had to cope with the real world.
Doing this task have given me confidence in myself how to communicate.
I can now critically evaluate my own work.
I need to be more critical and not take all academic reports at face value.
I have actually learnt how to conduct a communication in the organisation.
11
REFERENCES