11 II February 2023

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.48914
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

Implementation of ALU Using Modified Radix-4

Modified Booth Multiplier
Towseef Ul Haq Wani1, Ravinder Pal Singh2
1
M. Tech Scholar, Dept. of Electronics and Communications Engg, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab,India
2
Tech. Head-Dept. of Research, Innovations & Incubation / DESINNO-CoE, RIMT University, Punjab, India

Abstract: In this project, we propose a novel multiplier hardware design based on a radix - 4 modified booth encoder. The
standard modified Booth encoding (MBE) provides an uneven partial product array due to the extra partial product bit at the
least significant bit position of each partial product row. In this brief, a simple technique for constructing a regular partial
product array with fewer partial product rows and low overhead is provided, reducing the complexity of partial product reduction
as well as the space, time, and power of MBE multipliers. A SPST-based adder is examined and designed for the reduction of
power in partial product reduction
Keywords: Adders, SPST adder, Xilinx vivado, multiplier, booth encoding, radix 4 booth multiplier, modified booth multiplier.

I. INTRODUCTION
Since the speed of the multiplication operation dictates the circuit's speed, there is a requirement of quick multipliers in digital
signal processing. Systems for digital signal processing contain fast multipliers. Today, especially since the media processing
industry has taken off, the speed of the multiply operation is crucial for both general-purpose processors and digital signal
processing. In the past, addition, subtraction, and shift operations were typically used to multiply numbers. The multiplicand is the
amount to be added, the multiplier is the number of additions, and the product is the outcome. When the operands are interpreted as
integers, the product is generally double the length of operands in order to reserve the information content.
Columns of the shifted partial product matrix are added. The correct bit of the "multiplicand" is gated after the "multiplier" has
successfully been shifted. The shifted partial product matrix's same column must contain all instances of the multiplicand that are
delayed and gated. The product bit for the specific form is then formed by combining them. As a result, multiplication is an
operation with several operands. A practical number system would be the representation of numbers in two's complement format,
which would allow for the extension of multiplication to both signed and unsigned integers.
An M×N bit multiplication may be thought of as creating N partial product arrays, each with M bits, then adding them together
based on their weights. Either a Shift-Add algorithm or approaches for parallel multiplication are used to execute multiplication. M-
cycles are needed to multiply M×N bits using the Shift - Add technique. There are several methods for carrying out parallel
multiplication. The approach is chosen based on the designs requirements for latency, throughput, area, and complexity. The
reduction of the partial products arrays is crucial in parallel multiplication algorithms. Several procedures compact with dropping
the partial products arrays, and then Wallace tree or array tree adders are used to lessen the number of logic levels required to
perform summation. The finishing two rows are added using a fast Carry Propagate Adder.
Since multiplication is a highly slow process, the performance of any digital system is often evaluated in terms of the multipliers
that are employed. It will function at a slower pace and need a lot of hardware components to accomplish this multiplication.
Recently, a lot of solutions have been put out to address this issue. With the development of technology, several studies have
attempted to create multipliers that are suited for real-time applications by integrating high speed, small size, and low power
consumption into a single multiplier. The most crucial factor to take into account in many real-time applications is speed. Mostly,
multiplication operation is carried out by first generating the partial product and then adding to it.
Array multiplier is standard due to its edifice. It is based on add and shift algorithm. In parallel multiplication, the number of partial
products to be added is the main parameter that determines the performance of the multiplier. With one multiplier bit each partial
product is generated by the multiplication of the multiplicand. The partial products are shifted according to their bit order and then it
gets added with normal carry propagate adder. For n x n array multiplier, number of adders and gates required are:1.n(n-2) full
adders, 2.n half adders.The advantage of array multiplier is that it has minimum complexity and regular structure. Disadvantages are
large number of logic gates, so more chip area and it has high power consumption and it is limited to 16-bits. The advantage of an
array multiplier is that it has a regular structure and little complexity.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 188
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

The disadvantages include a large number of logic gates, which takes up more chip space, a high power consumption rate, and a 16-
bit maximum .Different performance metrics from the multipliers are required by different sorts of applications, including
scalability, configurability, high speed, low power consumption, regularity of layout, and minimal area, or a combination of one or
more of these properties. The arithmetic and logic operations are performed by tiny computers using the same principles as big ones
despite their differences in size and complexity, with the exception of the speed at which hardware units execute algorithms. In
addition special techniques are used to improve the speed by performing several operations in parallel.
Utilizing a strategy comparable to manually computing a multiplication is a quicker method to implement multiplication. The
complete partial product is produced simultaneously and is arranged in an array. To compute the result, a multioperand addition is
used. The two phases that make up most formalised multiplication algorithms are the first step, which creates a partial product, and
the second step, which adds the partial product to the previous partial products. The common multiplication method uses add and
shift operators. The shift operation generates the partial products and the adder units sum them up. The general scheme for unsigned
multiplication in base b is shown in Figure below

Figure 1: Multiplication Process

Each row or partial product is obtained by multiplying one digit of the multiplier times the multiplicand. The low order digit of a
partial product 4 is determined from just one multiplicand digit, but other digits include the effects of the carry from the digits to the
right. In binary, partial products are trivial – either a copy of the multiplicand or zero. The sum of the partial products gives the
computed result. One of the most significant arithmetic units utilized in computer systems is the multiplier. The construction of an
efficient multiplier has been discussed using a number of arithmetic methods. Wallace tree technique is among the most effective
approaches. This method may create hardware that executes multiplication operations in parallel and consists of full-adder and half-
adder circuits in three phases. The Wallace-based multiplying operation includes three stages:
1) Stage1: Multiply (or better expressing, AND) each bit of multiplicand by each bit of multiplier, yielding n2 partial products.
2) Stage2: Reduce the number of partial products using the layers of a FA and a HA blocks.
3) Stage3: Adding two n-sets resulted from the previous stage to an n-bit adder. It should be noted that the second stage is carried
out as follows. As long as there are three or more bits with the same value, add a following layer:
 Three bits of the same value enter into FA and as a result, two bits with different values are produced (one bit with the same
value and one bit with a higher value).
 If two bits with the same value remain, put them into an HA.
 If there is just one bit, transfer it to the next layer.

A. Contributions
The principles and architectural designs of a modified booth encoder for radix-4 are covered in this paper. A SPST-based adder in a
binary tree addition structure has been used for the reduction of partial products. After carrying out a thorough analysis and trail,
SPST with conventional adders is used to maximise the area and delay power. In order to retain efficiency and get optimum
parameters, it was later enhanced by the addition of a second adder known as parallel prefix adders to shorten the critical path
computation delay by the Ladner Fischer adder. This extended multiplier with SPST and PPA adder is built in a generic ALU as a
part of the application, which also includes a reprogrammable clock division circuit. These all designs are coded in verilog HDL and
synthesized and simulated using Xilinx Vivado

B. Outline
The rest of this research article is structured as follows. Section II discusses the literature study, Section III introduces the broad
vocabulary and fundamental principles of the modified booth encoding scheme. Section IV discusses the implementation of a booth
encoding technique utilising an SPST adder. Section V provided an overview of xilinx and verilog HDL. Section VI contains the
results and discussion, while Section VII and section VIII contains the findings, future scope, and suggestions.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 189
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

1) Shankar at el. (2021) paper entitled “Design a high performance and low power radix-4 booth multiplier using power
reduction techniques” proposed a design that helps to reduce the power by disabling all the available Booth encoders and
decoders from additional working. This design is implemented using Cadence 45 nm technology. From the simulation results,
it is seen that the , proposed pre-encoded design could be able to reduce the dynamic power and static power by 30% and 41%,
respectively, when compared to a traditional radix-4 Booth multiplier (16-bit). Compared to the previous mechanisms, the
proposed design has race-free characteristics and consumes less power.
2) Supritha at el. (2020) paper entitled “High speed and efficient ALU using modified booth multiplier” describes about a
modified booth multiplier planted in the arithmetic logic unit. The imperative modules of a 1-bit ALU are the module of power
and the module of addition. This ALU arrangement has decreased door check and semiconductor count.
3) Suvarna at el. (2016) paper entitled “A Modified Architecture for Radix-4 Booth Multiplier with Adaptive Hold Logic”
describes a new multiplier was designed with novel adaptive hold logic (AHL) using Radix-4 Modified Booth Multiplier. By
using Radix-4 Modified Booth Encoding (MBE), we can reduce the number of partial products by half. Modified booth
multiplier helps to provide higher throughput with low power consumption. This can adjust the AHL circuit to reduce the
performance degradation.
4) Nikhare and Ashish Singhadia (2015) paper entitled “A Detailed Review on Architectures for 2-DWT by using Radix-4 Booth
Multiplier” describes a review of VLSI architectures for 2-DWT implementation of wavelet transform by using 4 Booth
multiplier. This review paper describes implementation of radix-4 Modified Booth Multiplier and this implementation is
compared with Radix-2 Booth Multiplier. Modified Booth‟s algorithm employs both addition and subtraction and also treats
positive and negative operands uniformly. Parallel MAC is frequently used in digital signal processing and video/graphics
applications.
5) Sukhmeet Kaur at el. (2013) paper entitled “Implementation of Modified Booth Algorithm (Radix 4) and its Comparison with
Booth Algorithm (Radix-2)” describes implementation of radix-4 Modified Booth Multiplier and this implementation is
compared with Radix-2 Booth Multiplier. Modified Booth’s algorithm employs both addition and subtraction and also treats
positive and negative operands uniformly. No special actions are required for negative numbers.
6) Basha and Badashah (2012) paper entitled “design and implementation of radix-4 based high speed multiplier for alu’s using
minimal partial products” presents the methods required to implement a high speed and high performance parallel complex
number multiplier. The designs are structured using Radix-4 Modified Booth Algorithm and Wallace tree. These two
techniques are employed to speed up the multiplication process as their capability to reduce partial products generation and
compress partial product term by a ratio of 3:2. Despite that, carry save-adders (CSA) is used to enhance the speed of addition
process for the system. The system has been designed efficiently using VHDL codes for 8x8-bit signed numbers and
successfully simulated and synthesized using Xilinx.

III. GENERAL TERMINOLOGY

A. Reduction Of Partial Products
In the existing method, using the modified booth encoding scheme partial products are generated in a regular format neglecting the
last row bits as in the case of conventional encoding system. For an m bit width of input in the conventional m/2 + 1 number of rows
of partial products are generated. And the generation of conventional system was in irregular format. Now it was regularized and the
reduction was made to m/2 rows of partial products using radix-4 scheme of modified booth encoding. And then partial products are
reduced using half adders and full adders to get the final product output.
The half adder is used to add only two numbers. To overcome this problem, the full adder was developed. The full adder is used to
add three 1-bit binary numbers A, B, and carry c.The hardware requirement in terms of full adder (FA) and the length of final adder
(FAL) for different size of array multipliers is obtained in the manner given in below Figure.

Figure 2: Full adder

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 190
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

The adder known as a "full adder" adds three inputs and generates two outputs. A and B make up the first two inputs, while an
input carry marked as C makes up the third. The normal output is denoted as SUM, whereas the output carry is denoted as
CARRY.

In the above table,

 'A' and' B' are the input variables. These variables represent the two significant bits which are going to be added.
 'Cin' is the third input which represents the carry. From the previous lower significant position, the carry bit is fetched.
 The 'Sum' and 'Carry' are the output variables that define the output values.
 The eight rows under the input variable designate all possible combinations of 0 and 1 that can occur in these variables.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION
An SPST-based adder is paired with a modified booth encoding method based on radix-4 in order to reduce the power consumption
in the multiplier circuit. To achieve parallelism in the instance, a reduction of partial products tree-based structure was also applied.
We provide a unique SPST implementation technique for a high-speed low-power multiplier in this study. This multiplier is made
using the Spurious Power Suppression Technique (SPST), which is mounted on a modified Booth encoder and managed by a
detecting unit that makes use of an AND gate. The SPST adder will stop pointless addition, hence minimising switching power
loss.. The proposed MBE can be detailed as follows using a table along with the circuits it can be designed and values are generated.
For MB recoding, at least three signals are needed to represent the digit set {−2, −1, 0, 1, 2}. Many different ways have been
developed, and Table I shows the encoding scheme proposed in [reference that is assumed to implement the proposed MBE
multiplier.

The Booth encoder and selector circuits proposed in reference are depicted in Fig. 5(a) and (b), respectively. Based on the recoding
scheme and the approach proposed in fig.1, τi0 and ci in Fig. 2 can be derived from the truth table shown in Table II, as follows:

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 191
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

Figure 3: 5 MBE encoder and selector from reference

According to (3) and (4), τi0 and ci can be produced by one NOR gate and one AOI gate, respectively. Moreover, they are generated
no later than other partial product bits. To further remove the additional partial product row PPn/2, we combine the ci for i = n/2 − 1
with the partial product bit pi1 to produce a new partial product bit τi1 and a new carry di. Then, the carry di can be incorporated
into the sign extension bits of PP0. However, if τi1 and di are produced by adding ci and pi1, their arrival delays will probably be
larger than other partial product bits. Therefore, we directly produce τi1 and di for i = n/2 − 1 from A, B, and the outputs of the
Booth encoder (i.e., negi, twoi, and onei), as shown in Table II. The logic expressions of τi1 and di can be written as

Where,

Since the weight of di is 2n, which is equal to the weight of s0 at bit position n, di can be incorporated with the sign extension bits
s0s0s0 of PP0. Let α2α1α0 be the new bits after incorporating di into s0s0s0; the relations between them are summarized in Table
III.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 192
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

As can be seen in Table III, the maximal value of s0s0s0 is 100 so that the addition of s0s0s0 and di will never produce an overflow.
Therefore, α2α1α0 is enough to represent the sum of s0s0s0 and di. According to Table III, α2, α1, and α0 can be expressed as

The corresponding circuits to generate τi1, di, and α2α1α0 are depicted in Fig. 6(a)–(c), respectively.

Figure 4: Proposed circuits to generate τi1, di, and α2α1α0 for i = n/2 − 1

The partial product array generated by the proposed approach for the 8 × 8 multiplier is shown in Fig. 4. This regular array is
generated by only slightly modifying the original partial product generation circuits and introducing almost no area and delay
overhead.
After the computation of partial products as shown in figure four for addition of partial products we are considering a tree based
adder structure such that parallelism can be implemented and attain output in an efficient way as shown in below figure.

Figure 5: Tree based adder

Among them one of the adder can be selected as a SPST adder such that it will influence the overall design for power reduction

Figure 6: SPST based adder

A. SPST Adder
The above figure shows a 32-bit adder design adopting the proposed SPST. The 32-bit adder is divided into MSP and LSP between
the 15th and the 16th bit. Latches implemented by simple AND gates are used to control the input data of the MSP. When the MSP
is necessary, the input data of the MSP remain unchanged. However, when the MSP is negligible, the input data of the MSP
becomes zero to avoid glitching power consumption. The two operands of the MSP enter the detection logical unit, except the adder,
so that the detection logical unit can decide whether to turn off the MSP or not.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 193
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

The detection logical unit determines whether the input data of the MSP should be latched or not. We use 3 signals for asserting the
output of the detection logical unit- CLOSE, CARRY_CTRL, and SIGN. A certain amount of delay is used to assert the close, sign,
and carry-ctrl signals. The timing issue of SPST is analysed as follows:
1) When the detection logic unit switches off the MSP, the sign-extension unit immediately compensates for the MSP outputs,
thus the time saved by bypassing the computations in the MSP circuits will cancel out the delay brought on by the detection
logic unit.
2) When the detection logic unit turns on the MSP: the MSP circuits must wait for the notification of the detection logic unit to
turn on the data latches to let the data in. Hence, the delay caused by the detection logic unit will contribute to the delay of the
whole combinational circuitry, i.e. the 32-bit adder/subtractor in this design example.
3) When the detection logic unit remains in its decision: no matter whether the last decision is turning on or turning off the MSP,
the delay of the detection logic is negligible because the path of the combinational circuitry (i.e. the 32-bit adder/subtractor in
this design) remains the same.
V. XILINX AND VERILOG HDL
A. VERILOG
About 1984 marked the beginning of its development as a proprietary hardware modelling language by Gateway Design
Automation Inc. It is said that the original language's features were derived from both classic computer languages like C and the
then-most-used HDL language, dubbed HiLo. At the time, Verilog was not standardised, and it changed throughout practically
every edition that was released between 1984 and 1990.Verilog simulator was first used beginning in 1985 and was extended
substantially through 1987. The implementation was the Verilog simulator sold by Gateway. The first major extension was Verilog-
XL, which added a few features and implemented the infamous "XL algorithm" which was a very efficient method for doing gate-
level simulation

B. HDL
1) HDL is an abbreviation of Hardware Description Language. Any digital system can be represented in a REGISTER
TRANSFER LEVEL (RTL) and HDLs are used to describe this RTL.
2) Verilog is one such HDL and it is a general-purpose language –easy to learn and use. Its syntax is similar to C.
3) The idea is to specify how the data flows between registers and how the design processes the data.
4) To define RTL, hierarchical design concepts play a very significant role. Hierarchical design methodology facilitates the digital
design flow with several levels of abstraction.
5) Verilog HDL can utilize these levels of abstraction to produce a simplified and efficient representation of the RTL description
of any digital design.
6) As an illustration, an HDL may specify the layout of the wires, resistors, and transistors on an integrated circuit (IC) chip, i.e.,
the switch level, or it might specify the design at a more micro level in terms of logical gates and flip flops in a digital system,
i.e., the gate level. All of these levels are supported by Verilog.

VI. RESULTS
A. Proposed Multiplier
1) RTL Schematic

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 194
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

2) Technology schematic

3) Simulation

4) Area

5) Delay

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 195
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

6) Power

B. Extension Multiplier
1) Simulation

2) RTL Schematic

3) Technology schematic

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 196
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

4) Area

5) Delay

6) Power

C. Extension Multiplier in ALU

1) Simulation

2) RTL Schematic

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 197
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

3) Technology Schematic

4) Area

5) Delay

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 198
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

6) Power

7) Evaluation table for Area, Delay

Area Delay(ns) Power(W)

Proposed Multiplier 51 4.089 12.56

Extension Multiplier 50 4.016 12.179

VII. CONCLUSION
A radix - 4 modified booth encoder is created in this study. A SPST-based adder in a binary tree structure of addition is used to
reduce partial products. SPST with regular adders is been developed after a good trial and analysis, such that area and delay power
are optimum. Later, another adder called parallel prefix adders is added to minimise the critical path computation delay by the adder
Ladner Fischer adder in order to retain efficiency and acquire optimum parameters. As an application, this extended multiplier with
SPST and PPA adder is built in a generic ALU, and a re- programmable clock division circuit is included. All of these designs are
written in Verilog HDL and synthesised and simulated with Xilinx Vivado

VIII. FUTURE SCOPE

In the future, the proposed multiplier can be enhanced further by simultaneously adding the partial products. By utilising modern
technologies in the future, the area and delay can be decreased.

REFERENCES
[1] O. Chen, S. Wang, and Y. W. Wu, “Minimization of switching activities of partial products for designing low-power multipliers,” IEEE Trans.VLSI, vol. 11,
no. 3, pp. 418-433, June 2003.
[2] Z. Huang, and M.D. Ercegovac, ”High-performance low-power leftto-right array multiplier design,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol.54, no. 3, pp. 272-283,
Mar. 2005.
[3] M. C. Wen, S. J. Wang; Y. N. Lin, “Low-power parallel multiplier with column bypassing,” Electronic Letters, vol. 41, no.12, pp. 581- 583, May 2005.
[4] R.Prathiba, P.SandhyaR.Varun,” Design of High Performance and Low Power Multiplier using Modified Booth Encoder”. International Conference on
Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) – 2016
[5] Shiann-RongKuang, Jiun-Ping Wang, and Cang-Yuan Guo, “Modified Booth Multipliers With a Regular Partial Product Array” , IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS—II: EXPRESS BRIEFS, VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 2009
[6] SU MIN CHO, PRAMOD KUMAR MEHER, LUONG TRAN NHAT TRUNG, HYO JIN CHO, AND SANG YOON PARK, “Design of Very High-Speed
Pipeline FIR Filter Through Precise Critical Path Analysis”, ieee access, volume 9 2021
[7] W.-C. Yeh and C.-W. Jen, “High-speed booth encoded parallel multiplier design,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 692–701, Jul. 2000
[8] J.-Y. Kang and J.-L. Gaudiot, “A simple high-speed multiplier design,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1253–1258, Oct. 2006.
[9] O. Salomon, J.-M. Green, and H. Klar, “General algorithms for a simplified addition of 2’s complement numbers,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, no. 7,
pp. 839–844, Jul. 1995.
[10] E. de Angel and E. E. Swartzlander, Jr., “Low power parallel multipliers,” in Workshop VLSI Signal Process. IX, 1996, pp. 199–208.
[11] A. A. Farooqui and V. G. Oklobdzija, “General data–path organization of a MAC unit for VLSI implementation of DSP processors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp.
Circuits Syst., 1998, vol. 2, pp. 260–263.
[12] S.-F. Hsiao, M.-R. Jiang, and J.-S. Yeh, “Design of high-speed low-power 3–2 counter and 4–2 compressor for fast multipliers,” Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 4,
pp. 341–343, Feb. 1998.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 199
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue II Feb 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

[13] Shaik.KalishaBaba ,D.Rajaramesh, “Design and Implementation of Advanced Modified Booth Encoding Multiplier” , International Journal of Engineering
Science Invention w ww.ijesi.org Volume 2 Issue 8 ǁ August. 2013 ǁ PP.60-68
[14] Alisha, Tilak raj “Tracing of Delay Estimation in Heterogeneous adders with FPGA” IEEE 2017.
[15] Shubham Sarkar, Sujan Sarkar, JishanMehedi “Comparison of Various adders and their VLSI Implementation” IEEE2018 International Conference on
computer communication And Informatics (ICCCI-2018).
[16] K.AnirudhkumarMaurya, K.BalaSindhuri, Y.Ramalakshmanna, N.Udaya Kumar “Design and implementation of 32 bit adder using various Full adders” IEEE
(i-PACT2017) International Conference on innovations in power and Advanced computing technology.
[17] L. Qian, C. Wang, W. Liu, F. Lombardi, J. Han, Design and evaluation of an approximate Wallace booth multiplier. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE
International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp 1974–1977, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2016.7538962
[18] N. Ravi, T. Rao, B. Rao, T. Prasad, A new reduced multiplication structure for low power and low area modified booth encoding multiplier. Int. Conf. Model.
Optim. Comput. Proced. Eng. 38, 2767–2771 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.324
[19] S. Ravi, A. Patel, M. Shabaz, P. Chaniyara, H. Kittur. Design of low-power multiplier using ucsla technique. In Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary
Algorithms in Engineering Systems, pp 119– 126, New Delhi. Springer, New York (2015)
[20] A. Saha, R. Pal, A. Naik, D. Pal, Novel cmos multi-bit counter for speed-power optimization in multiplier design. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 95, 189–198
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue. 2018.08.015
[21] A. K. Sahu, L. Kumre, Low-power less-area bypassing-based multiplier design. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Inventive Computing
and Informatics (ICICI), pp 522–526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICI.2017.8365186
[22] J. Selvakumar, V. C. Bhaskar, Low power and area optimized truncated multiplier architecture. In IET Chennai 3rd International on Sustainable Energy and
Intelligent Systems (SEISCON 2012), pp 1–6, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2012.2209

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 200