Farrel Ipcrf 2022 2023
Farrel Ipcrf 2022 2023
I-II
Name of Employee: FARREL C. LAPORTEZA Name of Rater: NOEMI B. CALLOPE
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR-HANAWAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: MARCH 3, 2023
KRA 5: 13. Applied a August 2022- 14.00% Quality Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
details the reflects involvement shows the indicates a personal evidence was shown
Personal Growth
personal July 2023
consistent of learners in the application of a philosophy of teaching
and Professional philosophy of involvement of teaching-learning personal philosophy of that is not learner-
Development teaching that is learners in the process resulting from teaching that is centered
learner- teaching-learning the application of a learner- centered
centered process resulting from personal philosophy of
the application of a teaching that is
(PPST-7.1.2) personal philosophy of learner- centered
teaching that is
learner- centered
Timeliness Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable
philosophy of teaching philosophy of teaching philosophy of teaching philosophy of teaching evidence was shown
that is learner-centered that is learner-centered that is learner-centered that is learner-centered
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter
14. Set August 2022- Quality Updated professional Discussed progress Set professional Accomplished the No acceptable
development goals on professional development goals ESAT at the beginning evidence was shown
Professional July 2023
during Phase II of the development goals based on ESAT results of the School year as
development RPMS cycle as with the rater during as evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1
Goals based on evidenced by MOV 4 the Mid-year review as 2
the Philippine evidenced by MOV 3.
Professional
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
Standards for acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs evidence was shown
Teachers (PPST
7.5.2) Timeliness All four (4) submitted Three (3) of the Two (2) of the Only one of the No acceptable
MOVs were submitted MOVs were submitted MOVs were submitted MOVs were evidence was shown
accomplished within accomplished within accomplished within accomplished within
the prescribed RPMS the prescribed RPMS the prescribed RPMS the prescribed RPMS
Phase Phase Phase Phase
Plus Factor 15. Performed August 2022- Quality Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least No acceptable
one (1) related one (1) related one (1) related one (1) related evidence was shown
various related July 2023
work/activity that work/activity that work/activity that work/activity that
works/ activities contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the
that contribute to teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
the teaching- process beyond the process within the process within the process within the
learner school/Community school/Community learning class as evidenced by
Learning Center Learning Center area/department as the submitted MOV
(CLC) as evidenced by (CLC) as evidenced by evidenced by the
the submitted MOV the submitted MOV submitted MOV
Efficiency Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
details the achieved details the perceived shows reasonable shows considerable evidence was shown
positive contribution positive contribution interlap with the overlap with, hence
to the teaching- to the teaching- actual teaching- significantly affecting
learning process, as learning process, as learning process, as the performance of
evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the the actual teaching-
annotation provided. annotation provided. annotation provided. learning process.
Timeliness Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 was/were completed in evidence was shown
quarters quarters quarters only 1 quarter
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor