Alhoussaini Private Residence – Arzoun

• General view

• Description of the project:

The structure is composed of a basement and two residential floors, located

in Tyre Lebanon.

• Design criteria:

- Concrete strength: f’c=25MPa.

- Reinforcement yield stress: Fy=420 Mpa

- Soil allowable bearing capacity: 300 KN/m2, a sub-grade reaction value

=36000 kN/m3 (joseph Bowles formula).

- Codes and norms: ACI 318-metric and UBC97.

- Software used for calculation: Robot Structural Analysis, Auto CAD.

• Loads:

Dead Loads

- Self-weight of the structure, (Calculated by the software)

- Super imposed dead load = 4.5 kN/m2.

Live Loads

- Live load = 2.5 kN/m2

- Water Pressure on water tanks, 10 kN/m3. On walls of water tank, the
density was multiplied by wall heights and applied as a triangular acting
along the wall’s height.

• Seismic Analysis under UBC 97 Code:

• Seismic: 0.2g equivalent to UBC97 (zone 2B), Soil profile type SC

 Seismic Dynamic Analysis

Direction X

Case 6 - Seismic UBC 97 Direction_X

Mode CQC Fx (kN) Fy (kN) Fz (kN) Mx (kNm) My (kNm) Mz (kNm)
Sum of val. 2617.02 1451.99 147.41 0.10 0.08 0.00
Sum of reac. 713.19 49.55 95.69 541.06 6287.22 2296.80
Sum of forc. 713.19 49.55 95.69 541.06 6287.24 2296.80
Check val. 1426.38 99.10 191.38 1082.12 12574.46 4593.60
Precision 1.67531e+00 5.56026e-06

Direction Y

Case 7 - Seismic UBC 97 Direction_Y

Mode CQC Fx (kN) Fy (kN) Fz (kN) Mx (kNm) My (kNm) Mz (kNm)
Sum of val. 1088.59 1205.20 166.17 0.18 0.16 0.00
Sum of reac. 49.55 562.90 71.65 4699.23 1257.64 3604.19
Sum of forc. 49.55 562.90 71.65 4699.24 1257.64 3604.19
Check val. 99.10 1125.80 143.30 9398.47 2515.27 7208.38
Precision 1.67531e+00 5.56026e-06
 Seismic Static Analysis
Seismic Zone Factor Z = 0.2 (zone2B) Table 16-I (UBC 97)

Cv: Seismic Coefficient = 0.32 Table 16-R (UBC 97)

Ca: Seismic coefficient = 0.24 Table 16-Q (UBC 97)

Calculation of seismic load:

W=Total dead load+0.2Live load = (8752.25+4084.99) + 0.25x2732.31= 13520.3175 kN

Case 1 Selfweigth
Sum of val. 0.00 -0.00 1057.53 -0.00 0.00 -0.00
Sum of reac. 0.00 -0.00 8752.25 27850.10 -72033.02 0.01
Sum of forc. 0.0 0.0 -8752.25 -27850.10 72033.01 0.0
Check val. 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01
Precision 1.08958e-13 1.03025e-14

Case 2 SIDL
Sum of val. 0.00 -0.00 610.25 -0.00 0.00 -0.00
Sum of reac. 0.00 -0.00 4084.99 11837.00 -32653.28 0.00
Sum of forc. 0.0 0.0 -4084.99 -11837.00 32653.28 0.0
Check val. 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00
Precision 1.22695e-13 2.66596e-14

Case4 LL
Sum of val. 0.00 -0.00 342.67 -0.00 0.00 -0.00
Sum of reac. 0.00 -0.00 2732.31 8519.85 -22289.08 0.00
Sum of forc. 0.0 0.0 -2732.31 -8519.85 22289.08 0.0
Check val. 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00
Precision 1.14366e-13 1.69849e-14

The Total Design Base Shear not less than V min = 011
. CaIW = 356.93 kN

2.5CaIW
The Total Design Base Shear not more than V max = = 1474.94 kN
R

CvI
The Total Base Shear V = W;
RT
R: Response modification factor = 5.5 (Concrete Frame System) Table 16-N (UBC 97)

I: Importance Factor = 1.00 (Standard Occupancy Structure) Table 16-K (UBC

97)
 W=Total dead load+0.25Live load

Structural Period:

Method A: TA = Ct ( hn )
3/ 4

Ct: Numerical Coefficient = 0.0488 (1630.2.2 UBC 97)

hn: Height of the building = 9.9 m

T: Elastic fundamental period of vibration in seconds of the structure in the direction under consideration
TA=0.27s (Method A)

Method B:

Mode 1 is the governing in the X direction with Tx =0.82 > 1.4 TA=0.378 (REFER TO TABLE
BELOW)
Mode 4 is the governing in the Y direction with Ty = 0.35s < 1.4 TA =0.378 (REFER TO TABLE
BELOW)

Use T
x= 1.4 TA = 0.378s

Use T = 0.35s
y

So, the Total Static Base Shear in X directions Vx = W (CvI/RTx) = 2081kN

the Total Static Base Shear in Y directions Vy = W (CvI/RTy) =2247.54kN

VX & VY > Vmax , thus Use Vmax = 1475 kN

Dynamic Analysis Results - Case: 5 (Modal) Active modes: 1..50, CQC

Frequency Period Rel.mas.U Rel.mas.U Cur.mas.U Cur.mas.U

Case/Mode
(Hz) (sec) X (%) Y (%) Y (%) Z (%)
5/ 1 1.22 0.82 0.04 42.78 42.78 0.01

5/ 2 1.58 0.63 7.92 43.80 1.02 0.00

5/ 3 1.80 0.55 42.37 43.85 0.05 0.00

5/ 4 2.89 0.35 42.38 43.86 0.01 6.41

5/ 5 3.68 0.27 42.38 51.11 7.25 0.04

5/ 6 3.92 0.26 42.38 51.16 0.05 4.73

5/ 7 4.04 0.25 42.47 51.16 0.00 3.42

5/ 8 4.18 0.24 42.48 51.20 0.05 0.49

5/ 9 4.66 0.21 42.53 51.24 0.03 0.33

5/ 10 5.03 0.20 42.54 51.46 0.22 0.20

5/ 11 5.26 0.19 42.57 51.50 0.04 0.03

5/ 12 5.32 0.19 42.64 51.61 0.11 0.01

5/ 13 5.38 0.19 42.64 51.63 0.02 1.85

5/ 14 5.54 0.18 42.67 51.63 0.01 1.22

5/ 15 5.95 0.17 42.72 51.75 0.11 0.43

5/ 16 6.05 0.17 42.72 51.77 0.02 0.95

5/ 17 6.35 0.16 42.72 51.89 0.12 0.45

5/ 18 6.56 0.15 42.75 52.40 0.50 2.09

5/ 19 6.68 0.15 42.76 52.45 0.05 1.43

5/ 20 6.94 0.14 53.53 52.59 0.14 2.50

5/ 21 7.27 0.14 54.77 53.98 1.38 0.99

5/ 22 7.33 0.14 55.17 54.14 0.17 13.75

5/ 23 7.47 0.13 55.35 54.71 0.56 13.54

5/ 24 7.81 0.13 55.35 55.75 1.04 5.17

5/ 25 8.16 0.12 55.35 56.79 1.04 0.00

5/ 26 8.25 0.12 55.57 57.12 0.32 1.75

5/ 27 8.57 0.12 55.59 57.37 0.25 0.90

5/ 28 8.87 0.11 55.59 57.55 0.18 0.72

5/ 29 9.09 0.11 55.60 61.17 3.63 0.34

5/ 30 9.31 0.11 55.60 62.79 1.62 0.33

5/ 31 9.73 0.10 55.60 62.95 0.16 0.02

 5/ 32 9.94 0.10 55.66 63.03 0.08 2.37

5/ 33 10.25 0.10 56.09 63.27 0.25 8.10

5/ 34 10.49 0.10 56.28 63.39 0.12 0.03

5/ 35 10.73 0.09 56.35 63.47 0.08 4.68

5/ 36 10.92 0.09 56.46 63.50 0.03 0.74

5/ 37 11.06 0.09 56.66 63.55 0.05 2.60

5/ 38 11.26 0.09 56.66 63.55 0.00 0.00

5/ 39 11.36 0.09 56.72 63.77 0.22 0.27

5/ 40 11.50 0.09 56.75 63.79 0.02 0.12

5/ 41 11.58 0.09 56.75 63.93 0.14 0.02

5/ 42 11.65 0.09 56.75 63.93 0.00 0.72

5/ 43 11.81 0.08 56.92 63.98 0.06 0.01

5/ 44 11.94 0.08 57.12 64.02 0.04 0.04

5/ 45 11.97 0.08 57.20 64.37 0.34 1.46

5/ 46 12.09 0.08 57.25 64.37 0.00 0.01

5/ 47 12.27 0.08 57.35 65.10 0.73 0.89

5/ 48 12.53 0.08 57.53 65.12 0.02 0.91

5/ 49 12.61 0.08 57.84 65.28 0.16 1.98

5/ 50 12.80 0.08 57.92 65.48 0.19 0.57

 Scaling factor:

X direction = Vstatic / Vdynamic = (1475/713.19) = 2

Y direction = Vstatic / Vdynamic = (1475/562.90) = 2.62

 Calculation note

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2021

Date: 10/07/22

Project properties: ALHOUSSAINI PRIVATE RESIDENCE

Characteristics of analysis example:

Structure type: Shell

Structure geometrical center coordinates:

X= 9.215 (m)
Y= 3.088 (m)
Z= 4.950 (m)

Structure gravity center coordinates:

X= 8.230 (m)
Y= 3.182 (m)
Z= 3.808 (m)
Central moments of inertia of a structure:
Ix = 24070924.420 (kg*m2)
Iy = 50411298.270 (kg*m2)
Iz = 55426795.508 (kg*m2)
Mass = 892481.326 (kg)

Coordinates of structure centroid with static global masses considered:

X= 8.185 (m)
Y= 3.128 (m)
Z= 3.994 (m)
Central moments of inertia of a structure with static global masses considered:
Ix = 61617011.452 (kg*m2)
Iy = 127131082.368 (kg*m2)
Iz = 138654521.785 (kg*m2)
Mass = 2271170.042 (kg)

Coordinates of structure centroid with dynamic global masses considered:

X= 8.185 (m)
Y= 3.128 (m)
Z= 3.994 (m)
Central moments of inertia of a structure with dynamic global masses considered:
Ix = 61617011.452 (kg*m2)
Iy = 127131082.368 (kg*m2)
Iz = 138654521.785 (kg*m2)
Mass = 2271170.042 (kg)

Structure description
Number of nodes: 4707
Number of bars: 59
Bar finite elements: 61
Planar finite elements: 5739
 Volumetric finite elements: 0
Rigid links: 0
Releases: 0
Unidirectional releases: 0
Non-linear releases: 0
Compatibilities: 0
Elastic compatibilities: 0
Non-linear compatibilities: 0
Supports: 1424
Elastic supports: 0
Unidirectional supports: 0
Non-linear supports: 0
Non-linear hinges: 0
Cases: 20
Combinations: 13

Calculation summary

Solution method - Multi-threaded solver

No of static degr. of freedom: 25389

Bandwidth
before/after optimization: 0 0

Time info [sec]

Max time of aggreg. + decomp.: 1
Max time of subspace iterat.: 13
Max time of nonlinear iterat.: 0
Total time: 109

Disk and core usage [B]

Total disk space: 612245328
For solver TMP files: 0
For subspace iter. TMP files: 13405920
Memory: 10090648

Stiffness matrix diagonal elements

Min/Max after decomposition: 3.529508e+05 3.120819e+10
Precision: 9

Table of load cases / analysis types

Case 1 : SW
Analysis type: Static - Linear

Potential energy : 9.74144e+00 (kN*m)

Precision : 2.52350e-06

Case 2 : SIDL
Analysis type: Static - Linear

Potential energy : 3.58218e+00 (kN*m)

Precision : 3.32050e-06
Case 3 : DL
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 4 : LL
Analysis type: Static - Linear

Potential energy : 1.25573e+00 (kN*m)

Precision : 2.73370e-06

Case 5 : Modal
Analysis type: Modal

Data:
Analysis mode : Modal
Method : Lanczos
Type of mass matrix : Lumped
Number of modes : 50
Number of iterations : 50
Tolerance : 1.00000e-04
Damping : 0.050
Limits : 0.000
Coefficient : 0.000

Case 6 : Seismic UBC 97 Direction_X

Analysis type: Seismic-UBC 97

Excitation direction:
X= 2.000
Y= 0.000
Z= 0.000

A cceleration(m /s^2)
2.0

1.0

P eriod (s)
0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Data:
Zone : 2B
Soil : Sc
Seismic source type : A
The smallest distance to a known seismic source (km) : 4.000

Case 7 : Seismic UBC 97 Direction_Y

Analysis type: Seismic-UBC 97

Excitation direction:
X= 0.000
Y= 2.620
Z= 0.000

A cceleration(m /s^2)
2.0

1.0

P eriod (s)
0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

Data:
Zone : 2B
Soil : Sc
Seismic source type : A
The smallest distance to a known seismic source (km) : 4.000

Case 8 : Seismic UBC 97 Direction_Z

Analysis type: Seismic-UBC 97

Excitation direction:
X= 0.000
Y= 0.000
Z= 1.000

A cceleration(m /s^2)
2.0

1.0

P eriod (s)
0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

Data:
Zone : 2B
Soil : Sc
Seismic source type : A
The smallest distance to a known seismic source (km) : 4.000

Case 9 : 1.*X1.*Y1.*Z
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 10 : DL+LL
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 11 : DL+LL+0.71E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 12 : DL+LL-0.71E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 13 : 0.9DL+0.71E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 14 : 0.9DL-0.71E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 15 : 1.4DL
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 16 : 1.2DL+1.6LL
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 17 : 0.99DL+1.1E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 18 : 0.99DL-1.1E
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 19 : 1.32DL+1.1E+0.55LL
Analysis type: Linear combination

Case 20 : 1.32DL-1.1E+0.55LL
Analysis type: Linear combination
 • Drifts & Displacement:

According to UBC 97-Arcticle 1630.9.2,the inelastic displacement will be :

 M = 0.7 R S  M = 0.7  5.5 S (  S : Displacement due to seismic combination)

Results obtained showed that the maximum elastic drift is Ds = 1 cm in the X direction and Ds =
1.7cm in the Y direction under service load combinations.

The corresponding inelastic drift: Dm = 0.7 R Ds = 0.7 x 5.5 x 1.7 = 6.5 cm.
The maximum allowable limits for the inelastic drift permitted by the UBC code is : (taking into
account the lowest story height of the project= 355cm
Da = 0.02 h = 0.02* 330 cm = 6.6 cm > Dm. OK
1. Raft foundation

The raft foundation was designed with a thickness of 40cm. The value
of subgrade modulus used in the design 36000 kN/m3. Calculated using m3
(joseph Bowles formula) =
Qa x 120= 300x120= 36000 kN/m3.
 • Bearing Capacity:

✓ All values under service load combinations are less than the soil allowable bearing capacity
300 kPa.

✓ Displacement:

✓ All values under service load combinations are less than 2.5cm (average allowable value for
settlement in rafts)
• Reinforcement

 Directions X-&X+
 Directions Y-&Y+