Feasibility Study Module 5
Feasibility Study Module 5
Project Summary
(CHAPTER 2)
The project summary, though it appears after the title page and the table of contents,
is written only after all the aspects of the study have been completed. It is very important
since not all readers have the luxury of time to read every detail of the study. Oftentimes,
readers check the details only when they find the proposal financially interesting. The
project summary, therefore, should be written in sample language and in an interesting
manner to attract investor or any interested user. It is the façade of the whole study, and if
possible, it should win the hearts of investors.
With these sections, the total perspective of the whole study is vividly presented to
the reader.
Provide one to two brief paragraphs for his section in the project summary.
In suggesting trade names, the proponent should observe some mandatory requirements
set by government agencies like the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). The proponents
should suggest three possible business names to choose from and make brief explanation
about the proposed trade names.
Before proposing the trade names to the investors, the proponent should first check
with DTI whether the three suggested names already exist or not. In case a name is already
used or claimed by others, it should no longer be suggested. If the proposed business
organization is a sole proprietorship or a partnership, the proponent usually ends at this
point. However, when the proposed business firm is a corporate entity, the proponent has
to seek the approval of the SEC for the proposed trade names. In similar manner, if the
proposed business will engage in a banking operation, the requirements of the BSP should
be met.
In describing the industry where the proposed business belongs, the proponent
should answer the following:
1. What is the nature of the industry?
2. What are the trends in the global market?
3. What are the developments in the programs of the national government?
4. Are there barriers in the form of higher tariffs and other customs requirements?
5. What makes the project attractive?
6. What are the bright prospects of the proposed project?
Provide one to two paragraphs for his section in the project summary.
The term strategic in this context means that the location of the business, its head
office, plan site and outlets, should provide a competitive and ensure the attainment of
maximum efficiency. Competitive advantage means that the business has gained an edge
over its competitors that can hardly be copied and which provides higher profitability level.
The location could provide maximum efficiency of the business would be able to produce
the same amount of products at a lower cost.
A straightforward reason for the selection of the location should be indicated in this
section. It is highly emphasized that all underlying reasons for the project are viewed
valuable from the point of view or prospective investors, and not from the side of the
proponent.
In providing information about the location, one or two paragraphs may be utilized.
The setting assumptions is sometimes the bottleneck of the study, and may
become a constraint of these are not reliable. Assumptions should be realistic and
measurable. This is the basic guiding principle. Remember that investors are updated on
the current or recent financial data from stock exchanges, financial organizations, the
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other government
agencies. Using unrealistic assumptions spawns an element of doubt as to the reliability of
the study among investors. They may lose interest in the proposed project.
In case the answer to these four major questions are all positive, then the general
conclusion of the proponent would indicate a high probability of the feasibility of the
proposed project. The promoter, however, should never vouch for the attainment of the
findings and conclusion.
However, if one of the answer turns negative, then a general conclusion on the
feasibility of the project cannot be reached. The proponent should clearly indicate this
situation in his concluding remarks. Based on all of these analyses, recommendations, and
conclusions clearly indicated in the study, the user or prospective investor makes his/her
own final decision. His/her decision may sometimes be entirely different from the
recommendations.
The decision of the investors can only be to either implement the project or no.
implementation means that the project is discarded or aborted.
Once the investor commits funds for the implementation of the project, the
proponent next prepares a business plan. The business plan is a thorough and detailed
evaluation and scrutiny of the different factors and forces of the business environment. It
presents the step-by-step procedures on how to implement the proposed business.