Soyouwanttobean Economics Journalist?
Soyouwanttobean Economics Journalist?
ECONOMICS JOURNALIST?
5
Abstract 1. Introduction
This article examines and comments on the re- Dr Andy Stoeckel tells a story of visiting the
porting of economic news in the Australian me- editor of The Economist and asking him why he
dia, the influence on that reporting of media had taken the backward step of abandoning his
judgments about newsworthiness, the relation- career in Treasury to become a journalist. The
ship between economic reporting and the $- editor explained that, as an econocrat, he had
nancial markets, and governments’ use of the always had trouble getting his minister to take
media in the economic policy process. Finally, much interest in the policy memorandums he
it focuses on the role of economic commenta- wrote. But his minister was always asking his
tors in the quality press, their relations with the opinion of articles the minister had read in the
bureaucracy, their part in the rise of economic newspapers that morning. He’d decided he
rationalism and the nature of their influence on would have more influence if he became a
the formulation of economic policy. It con- newspaper economist.
cludes that when the commentators as a group That is an anecdote to warm the heart of
take up causes and pursue them over sustained every economics editor. An honest portrayal of
periods, they help to create a climate of elite the media’s role in the formulation of econ-
option which emboldens governments to un- omic policy, however, requires me to range
dertake politically diflcult policy reforms. much more widely and to reach a conclusion
much less flattering to journalistic egos. We
should start by looking at the media’s role in
general, before progressing to the particular in-
stance of their role in economic policy forma-
tion.
do they express their own opinions about the which messages they will carry. It is imposs-
news, and then usually in a way that is clearly ible for the media to tell us all that is happening
delineated from the news, such as an unsigned in the world, nor would we want to be told. So
editorial, a labelled ‘comment’ or a host’s con- a process of selection is inevitable. But the
tribution to a talk-back radio session. So the media not only select the information they will
media see themselves as essentially neutral pass on, they also decide the length of the mes-
purveyors of information, the carriers of mes- sage and the prominence it will be given.
sages between one part of the community and All these decisions are based on the per-
another. ceived ‘newsworthiness’ of the information in
In reality, the media’s role is not as neutral or question. Judgments about newsworthiness are
objective as they like to pretend. It is true, how- highly subjective and not easily reduced to a
ever, that the media’s power is not exercised list of immutable principles. I think the key to
solely by themselves and in their own interests. understanding the principles of news selection,
It is available to be used by others, and many however, is to remember-as so many aca-
institutions, interest groups, businesses and in- demic analysts of the media seem to forget-
dividuals regularly avail themselves of the op- that, with the exception of the ABC and SBS,
portunity. the news media are profit-making institutions.
Chief among those who seek to use the Either directly (as in the case of the press) or in-
media for their own purposes are, of course, directly (as in the case of the free-to-air elec-
governments. Government ministers and their tronic media) they are selling their news. So the
departments employ a small army of press sec- news they select is the news they believe their
retaries and public relations officers to ‘man- customers will most want to buy. These com-
age’-or, to be blunt, manipulate-their rela- mercial considerations introduce a host of bi-
tions with the media. Governments use the ases to the selection of news.
media to convey messages to the electorate, The essence of newsworthiness is the per-
and interest groups within the electorate. They ceived interest to the audience. (I say perceived
also use the media for information coming in because journalists and their editors are able
the opposite direction. It follows that the media only to guess at what their audience will find
are used also by members of the public and, interesting. In this guessing game they are in-
more particularly, interest groups to convey fluenced heavily by the guesses being made by
messages to governments. Messages from the their competitors.) This means that news selec-
public are conveyed by means of talk-back ra- tion is amoral: the search is for what people are
dio, letters to the editor, vox pop reporting and interested in, not what they should be interested
opinion polling. in. Importance is one measure of what is inter-
Media workers are perfectly aware that they esting and the media are forever yielding to the
are ‘used’ in this way by governments and temptation to raise the interest-value of events
powerful sectional interests and are, within artificially by exaggerating their importance.
limits, quite unconcerned. They see themselves However, what is important may not be very
as message carriers. The catch, however, is that interesting and vice versa. In such cases the in-
all interest groups don’t have equal access to teresting will almost always crowd out the im-
the media’s broadcasting service; among indi- portant.
viduals, the inequality is even greater. To have Aided by Tiffen (1989), we can list some
your message accepted for broadcast, it must views that are widely held by journalists and
be judged ‘newsworthy’. editors and which influence the selection of
news: people are more interested in other peo-
3. Newsworthiness and Media Biases ple than in concepts; they relate more to the
concrete than the abstract; they are more inter-
The obvious weakness in the media’s percep- ested in what people do than in what they say.
tion of their role as neutral carriers of messages It follows that governments invariably get
is that, unlike most messengers, they choose more media attention than oppositions. Bad
Gittins: Role ofthe Media in the Formulation of Economic Policy 7
news is more interesting than good news. Con- There is no country in the world that is as ob-
flict is more newsworthy than co-operation; sessed with economic issues as Australia. In other
costs get more attention than benefits; the countries, the front pages of their newspapers are
media tend to highlight problems rather than full of stories about civil wars, riots, racial ten-
solutions. sion, constitution crises, etc. Ours are filled with
balance of payments statistics, unemployment
In their concern to interest their audience, the
statistics, Budgets, etc. This is not an original ob-
media tend to pander to what they perceive to servation-I have heard it again and again from
be their audience’s prejudices. One conse- overseas visitors.
quence of this is a lack of logical consistency, [Macfarlane 1994, p. 11
especially in movements between the general
and the particular. In general, government There seems little reason to doubt that the in-
spending is likely to be portrayed as wasteful creased quantity of economic reporting reflects
and excessive, but decisions to cut particular increased demand for information about the
items of spending-say, to close schools or economy on the part of the media’s audience,
hospitals-are usually portrayed unfavourably. though this is difficult to measure because all
If you find this (partial) catalogue of the bi- media outlets present economic news as part of
ases inherent in the media’s selection of news a package of other news. It’s hard to believe
shocking and deplorable, I offer one comment that the media could go on foisting signifi-
in mitigation: the media’s failings mirror the cantly more economic news on their audience
failings of their audience, which are the failings than it wishes to receive, though it’s not hard to
of human nature. And this is no accident; it re- believe that this news could be presented in
flects the media’s primary motivation, which is ways that the audience found more useful.
commercial. However, it is possible that the increased sup-
ply of economic news by the media has added
4. The Media’s Coverage of Economics to demand. The media can’t impose an agenda
on an audience that is uninterested and unsym-
This general discussion of the media’s role and pathetic. But they can, and often do, reinforce
the biases that affect their performance of that and heighten an interest that is pre-existent.
role bears directly on the media’s coverage of As to the quality of all this reporting, the
economics. That coverage is dominated by the kindest judgment is that it is very mixed. It is
reporting of economic events, rather than ex- subject to many of the biases I have outlined:
pressions of pure economic opinion. Those exaggeration of importance, over-emphasis on
events include the release of economic statis- the hip-pocket implications (real or imagined),
tics, movements in prices on financial markets, greater prominence for bad news and reflection
government policy announcements, the publi- of the audience’s prejudices and mispercep-
cation of government reports and speeches by tions. As an example of the latter, falls in the
politicians and econocrats. Economic reporting exchange rate are invariably portrayed as a bad
is carried by all sections of the media: news- thing. As an example of the over-emphasis on
papers, wire services, radio and television, the hip-pocket-and consequent trivialising of
though less so by the (mainly weekly) news economic news-I remember that the media
magazines and business magazines. Outside reaction to the Campbell Committee’s report
the four or five organs of the quality press, the on financial deregulation focused almost ex-
reporting is done mainly by journalists without clusively on the shocking suggestion that the
economic training, much of it by Canberra gal- Government remove the ceiling on home-loan
lery journalists as an adjunct to their political interest rates.
reporting.
There is little doubt that the quantity of econ- 5. The Media and the Financial Markets
omic reporting has increased considerably over
the past decade or so. A deputy governor of the Much of the increase in economic reporting
Reserve Bank has remarked that: seems to be linked with the deregulation of
8 The Australian Economic Review 4th Quarter 1995
financial markets. A symbiotic but in some re- In that episode, market participants may not
spects unhealthy relationship seems to have de- have begun with a unified view that yields were
veloped between the media and the markets. rising because of market fears about rising in-
Both institutions have a focus on daily occur- flation, but by the time the media had finished
rences-that is, they are intensely myopic. telling all participants about the inflation fears
Both institutions have a vested interest in the of some participants, all participants were in no
volatility of economic indicators and financial doubt about why yields were rising.
prices-because it gives the media news to sell This means, too, that the media play an im-
and increases the markets’ opportunities to portant part in establishing the conventional
make profits (or losses) through trading. And wisdom-the ex-post rationalisation-as to
both are concentrated in the same city, Syd- why sustained movements in market prices
ney-increasing the opportunity for social in- have occurred.
teraction. The two institutions feed off each
other. News editors seem to have acquired an 6. A Critique of Economic Reporting
exaggerated impression of the wider economic
significance of relatively small and often tran- It can be argued that we suffer from too much
sitory movements in financial prices. These economic reporting, that we are taking the
movements are described in colourful lan- economy’s temperature too often. The promi-
guage: exchange rates and interest rates perpet- nence given to monthly and quarterly econ-
ually plunge, dive, leap and soar. The markets’ omic indicators has outstripped the ability of
tendency to react to economic indicators adds the public (and even of some reporters) to make
frisson-newsworthiness-to those events; sense of the information they are being bom-
any indicator that is closely watched by the barded with. Many seasonally adjusted indica-
markets will be widely reported by the media. tors are quite volatile from month to month; a
The media can’t merely report movements in surprising number move in a saw-tooth pattern.
market prices, they have to develop the story The public is being told that the economy is
by offering an explanation of why prices overheating one week and losing steam the
moved in the direction they did. Usually, this is next. This is the ‘thrills and spills’ approach to
done by junior financial reporters who patch economic reporting. It adds significantly to the
together a consensus view drawn from phone ‘noise’ in which policy-makers and policy ad-
calls to a handful of market participants. Then visers work, exposing them to almost continu-
the media take the story further by drawing out ous pressure and temptation to adjust policy
the possible hip-pocket implications for house- settings.
holds and speculating about a government pol- This is not to imply that we would be better
icy response. off if indicators were published less frequently.
The media’s exaggerated view of the wider Though the public might receive fewer con-
economic significance of movements in market flicting messages about the state of the econ-
prices has given the markets an exaggerated omy, so would those better equipped to inter-
view of their own importance. As well, the me- pret such messages, including the managers of
dia’s focus on the markets has increased the the economy. That would be too high a price to
markets’ ability to influence policy. pay. The ideal solution would be for the media
The media are an important channel by to pay more heed to the injunction of econom-
which movements in market prices impact on ists-and, indeed, the Statistician-not to
the real economy via confidence effects. It may make too much of ‘one month’s figure’. They
be that these confidence effects are as signifi- could do so simply by focusing their reporting
cant as the actual movements in prices. on the Statistician’s trend estimates. But I fear
The media are also an important mechanism this is a pious hope. The media have a vested
by which market participants communicate interest in volatility and, because they are
with each other. Take the sharp rise in long- daily, will always emphasise the incremental
term bond yields that began in February 1994. information simply because it arrived today.
Gittins: Role of the Media in the Formulation of Economic Policy 9
A related criticism of economic reporting is mitted to perform this larger role, when their
that the media’s preoccupation with day-to-day work isn’t adequately supervised, and when
movements in financial prices and month-to- journalists stray from providing explanation
month movements in macro-economic indica- and background to expressing ‘pure’ opinion
tors is crowding out reporting and analysis of of approval or disapproval.
the forests of economic reports being published I might add that the print media’s increasing
by government committees, parliamentary use of specialist economic journalists to pro-
committees, departments, research bureaus, vide analysis and opinion represents an attempt
private think-tanks and university research to differentiate their product from that of the
centres. In other words, short-term macro- electronic media and to exploit their medium’s
economics is crowding out micro-economics. comparative advantage. Newspapers are no
The public, and even professional economists, longer first with much of the economic news.
have neither the time nor the money to buy and Official economic statistics, for instance, are
read government reports. They rely on the released at 11.30 am. So by the time readers
press to provide them with summaries and pick up their newspapers the following mom-
analysis of reports, and alert them to the exist- ing, they are already well aware of the main
ence of reports of particular interest that they facts of the CPI, the unemployment figures or
may wish to get hold of. A report that isn’t read whatever. The press has to give its readers
makes a negligible contribution to the econ- something more than the main facts: more de-
omic debate. But many reports go virtually un- tails, more explanation of what the facts mean
reported and most go under-reported. In this re- and more discussion of the wider ramifications.
spect the quantity of the media’s economic
coverage doesn’t make up for its low quality. 7. Governments’ Use of the Media in the
The media’s traditional perception of them- Economic Policy Process
selves as engaged in the objective reporting of
facts, with no intrusion of journalists’ opinion, In considering the media’s role in the formula-
is nowhere more inaccurate than in economic tion of economic policy, we should start with
reporting, particularly in the quality press. Eco- the use that policy-makers and policy advisers
nomic reporting is highly interpretive; opinion make of the media. First, they use the media to
is not always restricted to separately labelled ‘sell’ their economic policies; to generate pub-
‘comments’, but often is mixed in with the lic and interest-group understanding of, and ap-
facts in news stories. When Dr Chris Caton re- proval of, their present and proposed policies.
turned to Australia after working for many It’s essentially a process of explanation: ex-
years in the United States, he was struck by the plaining the objectives and mechanisms of pol-
impression that, whereas in America the media icies; explaining the need for unpopular meas-
reported the game, in Australia they tended to ures. This can be democracy at its best-
join in the game. encouraging an informed ‘economic debate’-
I think the Australian approach can be de- or it can be more manipulative, conditioning
fended-up to a point. The Australian press is expectations and softening up the electorate for
more advanced than the US press in the belief unpalatable news. In the run up to a Budget, for
that economic news is too complicated for it to instance, it’s usual to leak details of most of the
be reported adequately by generalist reporters. unpopular measures, but keep the popular
Facts have to be selected and they ought to be measures for unveiling on the night, thus in-
selected by journalists with some understand- creasing the likelihood that the media’s initial
ing of the subject. Once a breed of qualified, reaction to the Budget will be favourable.
specialist economic journalists has been as- Second, ministers and their departments
sembled, it is appropriate for them to give their sometimes use the media to help fight their bat-
non-economists readers some guidance as to tles in Cabinet by persuading economic com-
what the facts mean. Problems arise when un- mentators to take up the cause. This tactic can
qualified or inexperienced journalists are per- be counterproductive if Cabinet decides it’s
10 The Australian Economic Review 4th Quarter 1995
being got at. Many leaks of Expenditure Re- decisions’ and ‘expressing yourself‘ each
view Committee decisions to cut spending pro- scored only about 20 per cent. And ‘champion-
grams represent attempts by the particular ing particular values and ideas’ scored only 15
department to overturn the decision by mobi- per cent.
lising the affected interest groups. Here you see I don’t doubt that these results are a reason-
an example of a common transaction between ably accurate reflection of the motivations of
journalists and people within government. The business and economic reporters-and, indeed,
leakers’ motive is highly self-interested and journalists in general. They see themselves as
their behaviour is clandestine. The journalists informers, not reformers. But our select band
are well aware of this but don’t care because, of economic commentators are not reporters,
by co-operating, they are ‘imparting informa- they are columnists. And most economic com-
tion to others’ and ‘uncovering and publicising mentators undoubtedly do see influencing pub-
problems’. What’s more, they know the story is lic policy decisions, influencing the public and
highly newsworthy and will attract the envy of championing particular values and ideas as im-
their colleagues! portant aspects of their job. They are the group
Third, policy-makers use the media for feed- of journalists most prone to campaigning on is-
back from the electorate and interest groups. sues-certainly more prone than political com-
Kite-flying is just one form of feedback. The mentators. They feel free to take sides on pol-
media reaction to an Industry Commission re- icy issues because they d o stick to issues and
port will have an influence on whether its rec- don’t expect to be seen as merely political par-
ommendations are accepted. tisans.
With respect to policy, economic commen-
8. The Role of Economic Commentators tators see themselves as having two main
roles: to try to explain government economic
Now let’s turn to the role of the print media’s policy and to try to change government econ-
economic commentators-a very small group omic policy. Some individuals give more
of economics editors and other professional weight to explaining, some to changing. To a
columnists who can be numbered on two commentator, explaining comes under our
hands. (Though Australian editors prefer to earlier heading of ‘imparting information to
employ their own commentators, the two na- others’. When commentators seek to explain
tional dailies have in recent years added the the economic policy of the government of the
contributions of a few outside economic col- day they are acting on the other side of the
umnists, mainly former politicians and aca- policy-makers’ and, more usually, the policy
demics. Their motive is to increase and widen advisers’ efforts to use the media to ‘sell’ gov-
the range of views, but not necessarily to pro- ernment policy. When commentators seek to
vide contrary views to those of their profes- change economic policy they often do so with
sional columnists.) the tacit encouragement of policy advisers,
A survey of about 100 business, financial who believe their political masters need to be
and economic journalists conducted in 1991 by encouraged in good works.
the Australian Centre for Independent Journal- As economists, economic commentators are
ism at the University of Technology, Sydney not original thinkers doing original research; if
(ACIJ 1993) asked them how they rated vari- they were, they’d be in universities. They write
ous aspects of their work. More than 90 per on a wide and ever-changing range of econ-
cent rated ‘imparting information to others’ as omic policy issues, whereas most econom-
either essential or very important. ‘Uncovering ists-academic and practicing-are highly
and publicising problems’ scored 80 per cent specialised. They work by following economic
and ‘being among the first to know what’s developments closely and keeping in constant
going on’ scored 55 per cent. But motivations consultation with other economists, who pro-
such as ‘influencing public policy decisions’, vide them with information, explanation and
‘influencing the public’, ‘influencing business intellectual stimulus. Because they write
Gittins: Role of the Media in the Formulation of Economic Policy
mainly about the state of the macro economy 9. The Economic Commentators and
and about policy issues, their chief contacts are Economic Rationalism
with the bureaucratic policy advisers in the
Treasury, the Reserve Bank, the Industry Com- It would be a mistake to think of economic ra-
mission and other government departments and tionalism as a phenomenon that sprang from
agencies. These ‘contacts’ provide a more de- nowhere soon after the election of the Hawke
tailed, sophisticated and frank exposition of the Government. What occurred in the 1980s was
reasoning behind policy decisions, and of the a coming to the fore of views that had long
pros and cons of policy options, than is pro- been part of the Treasury Line and which had
vided publicly by their political masters. The long been shared by the older economic com-
advent of a small army of ex-econocrats em- mentators-as witness, their long-standing
ployed in the financial markets has, however, crusade against protection and their criticism
made the press commentators less reliant on of the Arbitration Commission, wage indexa-
bureaucratic contacts for macro-economic is- tion and the arbitration system. Equally, it
sues. In my experience, commentators would would be wrong to see the rise of economic ra-
like to make more use of academic contacts, tionalism as a purely Australian phenomenon
but generally find that they aren’t familiar with (though just as wrong to see it as a local cover-
the latest developments (which are the com- version of Reaganomics or Thatcherism). Eco-
mentators’ focus) or aren’t sufficiently ‘ap- nomic rationalism-a term that was in cur-
plied’ (and it’s surprising how often they seem rency among econocrats long before it was
to be overseas when you need them!). All this picked up by Michael Pusey-is the local man-
may help explain why it’s uncommon to find ifestation of the world-wide revival of econ-
commentators running a line consistently criti- omic liberalism, with academic antecedence in
cal of the Treasury or the Reserve Bank- new classical economics and public-choice
though it’s not uncommon to find them consist- theory. Here, as elsewhere, it was fostered by a
ently critical of the government of the day. It decline of faith in the effectiveness and suffi-
should also be remembered that there are well- ciency of traditional demand management. As
established policy divides within the bureauc- for the reform that got the ball rolling in Aus-
racy-such as Treasury versus the Department tralia, financial deregulation, we were neither
of Industrial Relations on wage-fixing, and the the first nor the last country to make such
Industry Commission versus the Department of changes and to make them in response to global
Industry on industry policy. developments that left us little choice.
Despite their close contacts with the bu- Even so, it can fairly be said that economic
reaucracy, economic commentators are free rationalism and its policy expression, micro-
agents. They make their own decisions about economic reform, were ‘sold’ by the econo-
the extent to which they will rely on govern- crats to a Hawke Cabinet composed of minis-
ment sources for column ideas, they choose the ters who were younger, better educated, more
particular econocrats to whom they talk, and economically literate and more disposed to-
they decide which government policies they wards policy reform as such than any Cabinet
will help to sell and which they will oppose. In- that had gone before. With a few notable ex-
deed, they like to see themselves as fearless ceptions, the economic commentators needed
critics of government policies and perform- little persuading to join in the selling job. They
ance. As a class they have a pathological fear of sold it-and still sell it-to their readers and to
being seen as apologists for the government of the Government’s caravan. Why were they
the day. When they view the Labor Govern- such willing recruits to the cause? Partly be-
ment’s many reforms of the past decade they cause of their close links with the bureaucrats.
would like to believe not that they helped it Also because, though all economists are sus-
achieve those reforms, but rather that they ceptible to intellectual fashion, economic jour-
obliged and persuaded it to make them. The nalists are, by the nature of their jobs, more
truth, no doubt, is in the middle. susceptible than most. The news media are
12 The Australian Economic Review 4th Quarter 1995
about the latest; economic journalists have to worker most active in the expression of econ-
be up with the latest. Someone who swims per- omic opinion is a very different group: the
petually against a popular tide is easily seen- radio talk-back hosts. It’s been observed that
by readers and editors-as just not up with it. whereas the views of the newspaper commen-
There is, however, a more fundamental expla- tators tend to be very orthodox, restrained and
nation: the economic commentators and the intellectually respectable, the views expressed
econocrats went to the same university. They by the talk-show hosts are often ill-informed,
had the same schooling in neoclassical econ- strident and populist. Why should this be so?
omics; they shared the econocrats’ world view. Much of the explanation lies in the two media’s
At the time most of the policy changes were differing ‘target markets’. The quality press
implemented the economy was growing (and its advertisers) aims for the upper socio-
strongly. Doubtless there were dissenting economic groups, including business and pro-
views, particularly among academics, but they fessional people and the growing minority of
were muted. The media did little to seek them the population with university educations. It is
out but, to my knowledge, neither did they de- at the cerebral end of the media spectrum and it
cline to publish the contributions of experts acts accordingly. In contrast, commercial radio
anxious to have their dissent recorded. Editors (and its advertisers) aims for a mass market of
are not averse to controversy. The great reac- ordinary Australians, people with few intellec-
tion against economic rationalism came in ret- tual pretensions. Newspaper commentators
rospect, after the recession of the early 1990s aim to inform their readers; talk-back hosts aim
was under way and when it was easy to claim to provoke a lively exchange of listeners’
that economic rationalism had not only failed, views by giving them something to be indig-
but actually had caused the recession. As part nant about. The broadcasters seem to have dis-
of the post-mortem, Schultz (1992) asked: covered that the opinions which attract the
‘Where are the Alternative Views?’. That is a most calls (and listeners) involve intolerant
question to be asked of the possessors of alter- populism; ‘the government’ is an easy mark.
native views, and of editors responsible for pre- Talk-show hosts cover economic issues among
senting a range of views, not just of the econ- a host of others; few if any would have econ-
omic commentators. For the most part, the omic training; many are not actually journal-
commentators’ views were not alternative. ists-that is, they have no background in
What I would concede is that the commenta- factual reporting. In contrast, newspaper econ-
tors participated in the ‘over-selling’ of the omic commentators specialise in economics
benefits of the early micro-economic re- and have economics degrees. Their ease of ac-
forms-in particular, financial deregulation. cess to senior econocrats, and the frankness
They failed to foresee the extent of the transi- with which econocrats speak to them, is partly
tion problems and adjustment costs that would a function of their contacts’ judgment as to the
arise. But they were not alone in this, and the journalists’ depth of understanding of econ-
Reserve Bank has made similar admissions omics. This is a powerful factor in keeping
(Macfarlane 1991).It may be that any fears that their commentary intellectually respectable.
arose in the commentators’ minds were sup- How influential are the talk-show hosts on
pressed in the interests of ‘making the sale’; it’s economic issues? I believe that, as a group and
more likely that they simply lacked the percep- in concert with their callers, they are quite in-
tion to foresee the shoals that lay ahead. fluential, though in a strictly negative way. If,
after a policy has been announced or foreshad-
10. The Influence of the Economic owed, the callers run loud and long in their op-
Commentators position, not infrequently the policy will be
abandoned or modified.
I have focused so far on the role of the small How influential are the print media econ-
group of economic commentators employed by omic commentators? More than they would ad-
the quality press. But the other class of media mit, but less than you may imagine. Readers’
Gittins: Role of the Media in the Formulation of Economic Policy 13
minds are not blank pages on which journalists conventional wisdom to which the policy-
write. Newspapers offer a smorgasbord of makers respond.
stories from which readers pick according to It follows from this that economic com-
their tastes. Readers tend to read more for re- mentators are probably more influential in
inforcement than enlightenment; they keep matters of micro-economic policy than macro-
reading the things they agree with and stop economic policy. You may think that commen-
reading things that make them feel unconifort- tators, in concert with the financial markets,
able. They tend to remember things that fit with exercise significant influence over the size of
their pre-existing belief structure and tend to the deficits governments budget for. But a
forget things that don’t fit. They absorb what former deputy secretary in the Prime Minis-
they read through the filters of their own val- ter’s Department (Sims 1994) has observed
ues, prejudices and experience, and frequently that politicians are well aware of the ease with
take away a meaning quite different from the which they can influence the yearly debate on
one the author intended to convey. the size of the deficit. ‘Deficit discussion rarely
Commentators’ ability to influence public seems based on objective assessment, but in-
opinion is further reduced by the fact that they stead on whether or not the Government jumps
often are selling propositions that are counter- its own deficit hurdles’, he wrote. Commenta-
intuitive: protection doesn’t save jobs, technol- tors, as a class, seem to be more influential in
ogy doesn’t destroy jobs, minimum wages the micro-economic area, where they pick up
don’t protect the poor, and so forth. So the ideas, popularise them and press governments
commentators’ influence is probably greater on to act. Most governments want to perform great
‘elite opinion’ than on popular opinion. By acts of reform, but they want also to survive.
elite opinion I mean the opinions of people ac- The commentators’ role is to help create a cli-
tive in business and trade union interest groups, mate of elite opinion which convinces govern-
members of political parties, backbenchers, ments that they can make the necessary policy
ministers and shadow ministers, their staffers changes without endangering their survival.
and bureaucrats. The most striking example of this process is
There is, however, a second channel through the commentators’ role in tariff reform. Over a
which the newspaper commentators exercise period of 20 years or more, elite opinion-but
influence. Their columns are read by other not, let it be noted, popular opinion-swung
journalists in all the media, including political away from support for protection, to the point
journalists, journalists reporting economic where the Hawke Government was embold-
news and the talk-show hosts. So they have ened to announce its virtual phasing out. The
some influence over the rest of the media’s un- Government did so with bipartisan support and
derstanding of what it all means and which is- surprisingly little criticism. Bob Hawke’s an-
sues are more important than others. But you nouncement of the second stage of the phase-
would have to say that it’s a limited influence. down, in March 1991 during the depths of the
For instance, the commentators have not suc- recession, was greeted by the media-the
ceeded in persuading their colleagues that the economic commentators-as an act of historic
size and timing of asset sales are of little significance and great statesmanship. Why the
macro-economic consequence. sea-change in elite opinion on protection?
Though it’s no doubt true that some com- You’d have to give a lot of the credit to the In-
mentators have more influence than others, I dustries Assistance Commission, which cam-
believe it’s mainly the preponderance of com- paigned tirelessly for tariff reform over many
mentators’ opinion that has influence. When years. But you would also have to give a lot of
most of them are pushing in the same direction credit to the economic commentators, who-
and for a sustained period, that eventually will led by Alan Wood-also campaigned tirelessly
have an effect on elite opinion and, through over many years. To put it bluntly: the IAC
that, on economic policy. It’s a process of made the bullets and the commentators fired
wearing away the stone, of helping to create a them.
14 The Australian Economic Review 4th Quarter 1995
This, I think, tells you a lot about the econ- elite opinion. But, though they are open to
omic commentators’ role in the formulation of manipulation, economic commentators are not
economic policy. You can see them playing a passive agents in this process. They choose the
similar role in the moulding of elite opinion in issues on which they will campaign. Their in-
favour of decentralised wage-fixing and the de- fluence on economic policy formulation is
regulation of the labour market-although it is probably more indirect (that is, via their influ-
significant that, in this instance, fewer of the ence on the general climate of elite opinion)
bullets they are firing have been fashioned by than direct (in the sense that they suggest spe-
the bureaucracy. cific policy ideas which are new to the policy
advisers, or that policy-makers read newspaper
11. Conclusions articles and act on them). Individual commen-
tators probably don’t have all that much influ-
It is clear that the media play a significant role ence, but when the commentators as a group
in the formulation of economic policy, but the take up causes and pursue them over sustained
role they play is far from clear. They provide periods, they can shift the conventional wis-
the forum in which the economic debate is con- dom and create a climate in which govern-
ducted, and conducted on at least two levels: ments respond to pressure for policy reforms,
elite opinion and popular opinion. The media secure in the belief that they are not moving
carry messages in both directions between the ahead of elite opinion.
rulers and the ruled, but they don’t do so in a
neutral way. They select the messages they First version received December 1994;
carry and the degree of prominence given to $nu/ version accepted September 1995 (Eds).
them on the basis of their perceived newswor-
thiness, a process which imparts significant bi- References
ases to the communication process.
Media coverage of economic matters is pre- Australian Centre for Independent Journalism
dominantly concerned with the reporting and 1993, ‘Reporting business’, Working Paper
interpretation of news about short-term move- no. 5, University of Technology Sydney.
ments in the macro economy. The media exag- Macfarlane, I. J. 199I , ‘The lessons for monet-
gerate the significance of the inevitable volatil- ary policy’, in Proceedings of a Conference:
ity in financial prices and economic indicators. The Deregulation of Financial Intermediar-
This increases the ‘noise’ in which the macro- ies, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney.
economic policy-makers work, adding to the Macfarlane, 1. J. 1994, ‘Pessimism and opti-
difficulties of their task and possibly encourag- mism about Australia’s future’, Reserve
ing them to adjust policy settings more often Bank of Australia Bulletin, March, pp. 1-6.
than they otherwise would. The media’s cover- Schultz, J. 1992, ‘Where are the alternative
age of the debate about micro-economic policy views?’, in The Trouble with Economic Ra-
issues is much more cursory. tionalism, ed. D. Horne, Scribe Publications,
Policy-makers and advisers make consid- Newham, Victoria.
erable use of the media to ‘sell’ policy changes Sims, R. 1994, ‘History says cut the deficit for
to the electorate in general, but also to the growth’, Australian Financial Review, 14
opinion-making elite. Economic commenta- April, p. 2 1.
tors are one of the main vehicles through which Tiffen, R. 1989, News and Power, Allen & Un-
policy-makers and advisers seek to influence win, Sydney.
Received: 5 October 2017 Revised: 25 January 2018 Accepted: 22 February 2018
DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12579
ARTICLE
University of Amsterdam
Abstract
Correspondence
Alyt Damstra, Amsterdam School of This article provides an overview of key findings in the field
Communication Research, University of
of economic news research. The focus is on the relationship
Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018
WV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. between the real economy and economic news, and the
Email: [email protected]
subsequent effects of economic news on people's economic
perceptions. Additionally, we discuss research that looks
into the construction of economic and financial news. Rec-
ommendations for future research relate to the application
of mixed methods approaches and individual level studies,
and a specific focus on new (social) media.
1 | I N T RO DU CT I O N
It is a phenomenon as ubiquitous as it is elusive: the economy. When asked, most people have an idea—by and large—
of how the national economy is doing. Some have personally experienced certain economic advancements or
setbacks or know, for example, people who recently found or lost a job. However, more than by such first‐ or
second‐hand experiences, people learn about the state of the economy by reading and watching the news. Economic
news stories shape people's economic perceptions, which, in turn, have profound impacts on a range of other
attitudes and behaviors, and sometimes even again on the economy itself.
The interrelationships between economic news, economic perceptions, economic conditions, and other (political)
attitudes and behaviors have been the focus of research for decades. Besides the work on the effects of economic
news, there is a vast body of research that focuses on the content of economic news, showing how economic news
is characterized by a set of specific features. A strand of mostly qualitative research has focused on the process of
economic news production, in which different actors with different views on the economy and its management com-
pete for limited media space in an ongoing power struggle.
From a societal perspective, it is imperative to study economic news—both its content and its effects—because
it has such a strong bearing on the daily lives of citizens. Whether news reports deal with unemployment rates,
with inflation, or with bailout programs for bankrupt Eurozone member states, people are sensitive to the
message and tone of the content, especially when the news is negative. Moreover, the impact of economic news
on people's economic perceptions has subsequent consequences for a range of political behaviors, such as party
preference (e.g., Kalogeropoulos, Albæk, De Vreese, & Van Dalen, 2016; Lewis‐Beck & Stegmaier, 2000; Nadeau,
Niemi, Fan, & Amato, 1999; Sanders, 2000).
Sociology Compass. 2018;e12579. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/soc4 © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1 of 14
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12579
2 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
From an academic perspective, economic news comes with unique features rendering it an interesting topic to
study media effects. The availability of standardized economic data is high, facilitating comparisons between real‐life
trends and economic news in different contexts, often a more complicated endeavor in other areas such as crime,
foreign affairs, or the environment. As Soroka (2014, p. 83) puts it: “It allows us to explore the difference between
the distribution of information in reality and the distribution of information in news content.” This is not to say that
economic news is neutral or unidimensional, for a variety of reasons it is not. But news reports about decreasing or
increasing unemployment rates, or a growing or shrinking economy, do lend themselves to be compared with
over‐time trends in the actual measurements, allowing to assess real‐world reflectiveness of certain news content.
This article provides an overview of the key findings in the field, shedding light on what we know about economic
news, and what is still to be learned.
2 | T HE A N T E C ED E N T S O F E C O N O M I C N E W S
robust tendency in economic journalism to overemphasize negative trends, which might lead to a distorted informa-
tion environment for citizens, at least in modern Western democracies.
In terms of newsworthiness, not all types of economic developments are considered equally important. Several
studies point to a remarkable sensitivity among journalists towards shifts in unemployment rates (Fogarty, 2005;
Goidel & Langley, 1995). Fogarty (2005) finds that changes in unemployment rates lead to more economic news,
while changes in inflation rates or ICI (index of coincident indicators) do not lead to more coverage. Arguably, this
may be explained by the abstractness of the latter issues. Additionally, Soroka et al. (2015) investigate whether news
content is most reflective of past, current, or future economic trends. While often perceived as a function of current
economic conditions, the authors find that economic news is actually more reflective of future conditions: “It
responds more to where the economy is going, not where it has been or where it currently is” (Soroka et al., 2015,
p. 467).
developments: To wake up the citizenry, jounalists should ring the “burglar alarm” when the economy moves in the
wrong direction, so people can defend their interests in future elections (Zaller, 2003).
Research, however, shows that economic and financial journalists hold divergent views when it comes to this role
(Strauß, 2018; Tambini, 2010; Usher, 2012). Tambini (2010) finds that only a small minority of UK financial journalists
actually perceives themselves as watchdogs. Usher (2012) identifies two lines of reasoning (or “defense” as she puts
it) as brought forward by New York Times journalists who she interviewed. First, journalists primarily identify with a
“transmission” role: It is their task to provide accurate information, but it is up to the public to respond adequately
(Usher, 2012, p. 203). Second, journalists are hampered to perform as watchdogs because they do not have enough
access to necessary information. These arguments are in line with a recent study by Strauß (2018) who points to a
discrepancy between the watchdog role that journalists envision for themselves and their actual role enactment.
These findings touch upon a core challenge posed to economic journalists. The complex economic‐financial reality
combined with increasing institutional pressures makes investigative journalism a costly and risky endeavor, while
it is precisely through investigations and critical in‐depth news reporting that the watchdog role can be fulfilled
adequately.
News values theory provides another explanation for the prevalence of negative news. References to something
negative make a story more likely to be selected by journalists (e.g., Galtung & Ruge, 1965; Harcup and O'Neill, 2001)
because bad news tends to be consensual and unambiguous as well as unexpected, presupposing “a culture in
which progress is somehow regarded as the normal and trivial thing that can pass unreported” (Galtung & Ruge,
1965, pp. 69–70). Together, these features make negative phenomena more likely to be selected as news.
In addition, work on behavioral economics has shown how people are more responsive to negative compared to
positive information (e.g., Holbrook, Krosnick, Visser, Gardner, & Cacioppo, 2001; Soroka, 2006): They are loss
aversive. The psychological process behind this asymmetry is described as the negativity effect: The greater weight
assigned to negative as compared to equally positive information in the formation of judgments (Ahluwalia, 2002;
Tversky & Kahneman, 1973, 1974). As journalists are individuals too, their own (asymmetric) interests combined with
the (asymmetric) interests of their news‐consuming audience might lead them to perceive negative information as
more important (Soroka, 2006, p. 374).
Quantitative research offers important insights into the structural biases distinguishing economic news from
economic reality. Qualitative research, additionally, lays bare the mechanisms of economic and financial news produc-
tion, critically assessing the factors at play that determine which issues receive attention in the first place, and how
these issues are covered in terms of framing.
Media content is not neutral. In fact, it is a social construct and, therefore, often ideologically colored. The vast
majority of the economic/financial press tends to support the neoliberal status quo, thereby failing to offer a wider
range of other perspectives to the public, most notably perspectives that critically challenge existing capitalistic struc-
tures (e.g., Berry, 2012, Berry, 2015, Berry, 2016; Chakravartty & Schiller, 2011; Damstra & Vliegenthart, 2016; Davis,
2006, Davis, 2011; Doyle, 2006; Durham, 2007; Duval, 2005; Jensen, 1987; Marron, Sarabia‐Panol, Sison, Rao, &
Niekamp, 2010; Philo, 1995; Philo, Miller, & Happer, 2015; Tambini, 2010; Tracy, 2012). In general, a certain bias
in the selection of news stories is inextricably linked to news production processes: (National) cultures, organizational
structures, ideological outlet profiles, and differential power of political and societal actors, as well as the choices by
individual journalists—all have an impact on the construction of news content (Vliegenthart & Van Zoonen, 2011). As
a result, news tends to be characterized by negativity, conflict framing, and an overrepresentation of the views of
those having political power (Bennett, 1990). However, the specific nature of economic news leads to an additional,
more issue‐related bias: Journalists are guided by certain considerations regarding the “utility and levels of financial
literacy” among their target audience (Doyle, 2006, p. 436). In other words, the high complexity of the economic
and financial world requires that journalists tailor their stories to their readership in terms of comprehensibility.
As a result, two types of financial journalism have emerged over the years: (a) specialist financial journalism
serving a selective audience of financial professionals and (b) generalist financial journalism that focuses on informing
the broader public (Schifferes, 2011). For mainstream, nonfinancial media, this implies that economic news needs to
be easy to grasp and entertaining (Clark, Thrift, & Tickell, 2004; Guerrera, 2009), which results in an overrepresenta-
tion of superficial news about well‐known companies and big money deals (Doyle, 2006; Tambini, 2010; Tumber,
1993), at the expense of more critical, in‐depth analyses key to investigative journalism. Additionally, with financial
markets becoming increasingly complex, journalists themselves are often lacking the specialized knowledge to criti-
cally assess financial products and practices (Davis, 2006; Doyle, 2006; Guerrera, 2009; Marron et al., 2010;
Schifferes, 2011; Schiffrin, 2015; Tambini, 2010; Tett, 2009; Usher, 2012).
Due to this increasing complexity, economic/financial journalists are often in a position of high source dependency.
AsTambini (2010, p. 159) puts it, “interested parties […] sometimes constitute the only repositories of relevant data and
(they) employ the main experts.” Therefore, journalists—themselves lacking both expertise and access—need to rely on
these elite sources, which generally do not bring forward radical critical perspectives. As a result, stakeholders—through
their PR services—are able to control information. This elite source dependency is empirically confirmed by many stud-
ies (Berry, 2015, 2016; Davis, 2000; Fahy, O'Brien, & Poti, 2010; Galbraith, 2004, 2009; Kollmeyer, 2004; Manning,
2013; Rafter, 2014; Reich, 2012; Strauß, 2018; Tambini, 2010; Thompson, 2013; Tracy, 2012) and comes at the
expense of the use of, for example, union leaders or workers as primary sources (Kollmeyer, 2004). Also compared with
other types of news reporting—political, territorial—economic journalists use least diverse sources (Reich, 2012).
Furthermore, the close ties connecting (financial) journalists to (financial) experts carries the risk of the former
being “captured” by the system of the latter. This can be illustrated by, for example, financial outlets receiving huge
advertising revenues from credit card companies (Davies, 2009; Davis, 2002, 2011; Kollmeyer, 2004; Marron et al.,
2010; Schechter, 2009; Tambini, 2010) or financial reporters “crossing the aisle” and start working for financial
corporations (Schechter, 2009). This close interconnectedness is argued to (partly) account for the fact that the news
media were caught by surprise when the 2008 financial crisis broke out and left many wondering why (almost)
nobody had seen it coming, including highly esteemed financial media (Berry, 2012; Fraser, 2009; Guerrera, 2009;
Fahy et al., 2010; Lashmar, 2008; Marron et al., 2010; Mercille, 2013; Schechter, 2009; Schifferes, 2011, 2012;
Tambini, 2010; Tracy, 2012).
6 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
Furthermore, institutional pressures reinforce the tendency by the media to report in a way that is compatible
with dominant perspectives as put forward by (economic and political) elites. Media outlets themselves are commer-
cially driven enterprises as well (e.g., Davis, 2000; Doyle, 2006; Guerrera, 2009; Hamilton, 2009; Happer, 2017;
Knowles, Phillips, & Lidberg, 2017; Philo et al., 2015; Schechter, 2009). The professional environment in which jour-
nalists operate has become increasingly competitive, due to institutional pressures related to declining readerships,
insecure advertisement revenues, increased output demands, and the rise of free online data services. This has
resulted in a branch with high degrees of compartmentalization (Schifferes, 2011; Tett, 2009), in which “expensive
and risky ventures such as investigations are increasingly difficult to fund” (Tambini, 2010, p. 169).
The financial crisis (2008–2009) has served as a fruitful test case for the analysis of existing biases in financial and
economic news reporting. Often departing from the question why the media did not see it coming (e.g., Fraser, 2009;
Lashmar, 2008; Starkman, 2009), scholars scrutinized the way in which the crisis was covered (Arrese & Vara‐Miguel,
2016; Berry, 2012; Damstra & Vliegenthart, 2016; Happer, 2017; Pirie, 2012; Schifferes & Knowles, 2014) in multiple
contexts. It is concluded that media covered the crisis rather uncritically, depriving the audience from a diverse array
of possible solutions to it (Arrese & Vara‐Miguel, 2016; Berry, 2012; Happer, 2017; Mercille, 2013; Pirie, 2012). The
fact that even the most encompassing crisis of our times did not evoke more radical and critical responses under-
scores the dominance of the neoliberal paradigm in economic news reporting (Happer, 2017) and the difficulty for
journalists to forge new ways to analyze outside the prevalent market‐driven consensus (Arrese & Vara‐Miguel,
2016, p. 150).
3 | T HE E F F E C T S OF E C O N O M I C N E W S
optimism among the public. However, negative news also leads to higher levels of internal economic efficacy, as
Svensson, Albæk, Van Dalen, and De Vreese (2017b) show. Negativity may trigger people's motivation to understand
and to use information to deal with possible threats.
In most measures, consumer confidence contains items asking people to judge the past and future state of their
national economy. More specifically, it asks whether they think the economy has or will deteriorate(d) or improve(d).
Specifying confidence on this time dimension yields additional, but also mixed insights into economic news effects.
Damstra and Boukes (2018) find that economic news matters for people's future judgments but not for their
evaluations over the economic past. By contrast, Soroka (2014) and Soroka et al. (2015) find media effects on people's
prospective but also retrospective judgments.
Economic issues that audiences experience directly and dramatically, such as unemployment or recession
may leave less room for media effects (…). The general state of the nation's economic health may be a
less obtrusive issue, leaving editors with the opportunity (…) to raise concern when the public does not
anticipate or feel directly the effects of economic downturn.
Haller and Norpoth (1997, p. 573) use a similar approach when explaining the absence of media effects. They
consider the economy “a classic doorstep issue, capable of shaping public opinion through real‐world experience,”
leaving less room for media effects.
In contrast to the idea of stronger news effects in situations of low issue obtrusiveness, some studies indicate
that economic news effects are strongest in times of crisis, because detrimental economic conditions increase
8 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
people's willingness to update their economic expectations (e.g., Carroll, 2003; Doms & Morin, 2004). Under “normal”
prosperous circumstances, economic expectations tend to be sticky: People have no incentive to regularly absorb
economic information and their expectations, therefore, tend to remain rather stable over time. However, in times
of crisis, people tend to update their information more frequently because (a) it is more likely to (accidently) come
across economic news due to higher volumes; and (b) consumers are more willing to read or watch economic news
items. In particular, dramatically negative headlines (“Recession possible!”) might be deemed relevant by the public,
because these suggest that the provided information is directly related to their own financial future (Doms & Morin,
2004; McCarthy & Dolfsma, 2014).
The hypothesis of stronger media effects in bad economic times is supported by several studies. Doms and Morin
(2004) find that consumer sentiment is most susceptible to media effects when coverage is high, which is in times of
economic distress. Similarly, Wu et al. (2002) conclude that media effects are strongest in times of downturn, suggest-
ing that people pay greater attention to economic news when the issue is most relevant to them. Goidel and Langley
(1995, p. 326) find most pronounced media effects when economic signals are mixed, and, subsequently, subject to a
variety of interpretations (which was the case during the US 1992 Elections). In contrast, Damstra and Boukes (2018)
do not find any differences in media effects for periods of economic growth versus decline.
Media dependency theory (MDT) provides another theoretical angle to understand the conditionality of media
effects. Originally proposed by Ball‐Rokeach and DeFleur (1976), MDT predicts that the impact of news is contingent
upon the level of audience dependency on media information resources: The higher this dependency, the greater the
likelihood that media information will influence citizens' cognitions, feelings, or behaviors. People might be more
dependent upon mediatized information when they have less real‐life clues or experiences to build their judgments
on. Therefore, media effects are stronger for people's sociotropic evaluations (judgments of the national economy)
compared to evaluations of their own economic situation (Boomgaarden, Van Spanje, Vliegenthart, & De Vreese,
2011). Kalogeropoulos (2017) shows that personal economic expectations are not influenced by economic news in
general, but only by more dramatic (i.e., tabloid) stories dealing with unemployment specifically. Similarly, economic
news is expected to have a bigger impact on people's expectations for the future than for their evaluations over
the past (Damstra & Boukes, 2018).
Also, higher levels of uncertainty make people more dependent on mediated information. Uncertainty can be
conceptualized as a subjective experience shaped by external circumstances, such as a crisis; however, uncertainty
can also be part of mediated information itself. A recent study by Van Dalen et al. (2016) looks into the impact of
uncertainty when this is explicitly mentioned in economic news articles, and finds a negative effect on consumer con-
fidence, above and beyond the impact of tone. Svensson, Albæk, Van Dalen, and De Vreese (2017a) investigate the
impact of ambiguous economic news and identify economic uncertainty as the mediator through which consumer
confidence is affected.
promising. First of all, quantitative research studying the triangle of the economy, economic news, and economic
perceptions needs to be integrated with research critically examining the construction of economic news. Some
contradictory findings coexist that call for further examination: Whereas the former tradition points to a preoccupa-
tion with negativity among economic journalists, the latter identifies the absence of critical perspectives. One expla-
nation for this apparent contradiction might be related to the tendency among journalists to focus on the short term
(Fraser, 2009, p. 80). The negativity bias among journalists, in that sense, might only imply writing more about unem-
ployment when it goes up compared to when it goes down. However, being critical in the short term, without
reflecting upon and questioning the overarching system, eventually leads to economic news reporting in which
negative trends receive only more superficial—and therefore uncritical—coverage.
Second, more individual‐level research is needed. Especially when it comes to the conditionality of economic
news effects, experimental research would help to understand which aspects of (negative) economic news provoke
the strongest effects, which citizens are most susceptible to these effects, and through which mediating mechanisms
these effects occur.
Finally, the overwhelming majority of studies rely on traditional conceptualizations of news media, with print
media being the absolute favorite. There is only limited research into differences across traditional media outlets
(Goidel et al., 2010). While these outlets are still highly relevant, recent research suggests that the content of online
economic news or on (social) media might be systematically different (see, for example, Schifferes & Coulter, 2013;
Soroka et al., 2017) and might have different effects as well. Further exploring this avenue is crucial to enhance
our understanding of the social world around us that is shaped by real economic conditions, by economic coverage
in an ever‐changing media environment and by people's economic perceptions.
FUNDI NG
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article: Research conducted for this article was funded by a VIDI grant (project number: 016.145.369) from the Neth-
erlands Organization for Scientific Research awarded to Prof. Rens Vliegenthart.
ORCID
Alyt Damstra http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-018X
Mark Boukes http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-6281
RE FE R ENC ES
Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2),
270–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/341576
Alsem, K., Brakman, S., Hoogduin, L., & Kuper, G. (2008). The impact of newspapers on consumer confidence: Does spin bias
exist? Applied Economic, 40(5), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600707100
Arrese, Á., & Vara‐Miguel, A. (2016). A comparative study of metaphors in press reporting of the Euro crisis. Discourse &
Society, 27(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611552
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
Ball‐Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass‐media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3–21.
https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101
Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real‐world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly,
49(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/268900
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press‐state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–
127. https://doi.rog/10.1111/j.1460‐2466.1990.tb02265.x
Berry, M. (2012). The Today programme and the banking crisis. Journalism, 14(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1464884912458654
10 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
Berry, M. (2015). The UK press and the deficit debate. Sociology, 50(3), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0038038515582158
Berry, M. (2016). No alternative to austerity: How BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate. Media, Culture & Society,
38(6), 844–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715620931
Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1995). Recession headline news, consumer sentiment, the state of the economy and presiden-
tial popularity: A time series analysis 1989‐1993. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.
org/10.1093/ijpor/7.1.2
Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1997). Economic headline news on the agenda: New approaches to understanding causes and
effects. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers
in agenda‐setting theory (pp. 97–113). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boomgaarden, H. G., Van Spanje, J., Vliegenthart, R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Covering the crisis: Media coverage of the
economic crisis and citizens' economic expectations. Acta Politica, 46(4), 353–379. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2011.18
Boudoukh, J., Feldman, R., Kogan, S., & Richardson, M. (2013). Which news moves stock prices? A textual analysis (No.
w18725). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18725
Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). A general pattern of newsworthiness? Analyzing news values in popular,
quality, regional and financial newspapers. Journalism. Advance online publication, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1464884917725989
Carroll, C. D. (2003). Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. The Quarterly Journal of
Economic, 118(1), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535207
Casarin, R., & Squazzoni, F. (2013). Being on the field when the game is still under way. The financial press and stock markets
in times of crisis. PLoS One, 8(7), e67721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067721
Casey, G. P., & Owen, A. L. (2013). Good news, bad news, and consumer confidence. Social Science Quarterly, 94(1), 292–315.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐6237.2012.00900.x
Chakravartty, P., & Schiller, D. (2011). Neoliberal Newspeak and Digital Capitalism in Crisis. International Journal of Commu-
nication, 4(23), 670–692.
Clark, G., Thrift, N., & Tickell, A. (2004). Performing finance: The industry, the media and its image. Review of International
Political Economy, 11(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290410001672813
Damstra, A., & Boukes, M. (2018). The economy, the news and the public: A longitudinal study of the impact of economic
news on economic evaluations and expectations. Communication Research. Advance Online Publication, 1–25. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0093650217750971.
Damstra, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). (Un)covering the economic crisis? Over‐time and inter‐media differences in salience
and framing. Journalism Studies. Advance online publication, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1246377
Davies, N. (2009). Flat earth news. London: Viking.
Davis, A. (2000). Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media.
Media, Culture & Society, 22(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022001003
Davis, A. (2002). Public relations democracy: Politics, public relations and the mass media in Britain. Manchester, England:
Manchester University Press.
Davis, A. (2006). Media effects and the question of the rational audience: Lessons from the financial markets. Media, Culture
& Society, 28(4), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706065035
Davis, A. (2011). Mediation, financialization, and the global financial crisis. In D. Winseck, & D. Y. Jin (Eds.), The political
economies of media: The transformation of the global media (pp. 241–254). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
De Boef, S., & Kellstedt, P. M. (2004). The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of
Political Science, 48(4), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519924
Doms, M., & N. Morin. (2004). Consumer sentiment, the economy, and the news media. FRB of San Francisco Working
Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.602763
Doyle, G. (2006). Financial news journalism: A post‐Enron analysis of approaches towards economic and financial news
production in the UK. Journalism, 7(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906068361
Durham, F. D. (2007). Framing the state in globalization: The Financial Times' coverage of the 1997 Thai currency crisis.
Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701214538
Duval, J. (2005). Economic journalism in France. In R. Benson, & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field
(pp. 135–155). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Fahy, D., O'Brien, M., & Poti, V. (2010). From boom to bust: A post‐Celtic Tiger analysis of the norms, values and roles of Irish
financial journalists. Irish Communication Review, 11(1), 4.
DAMSTRA ET AL. 11 of 14
Fogarty, B. J. (2005). Determining economic news coverage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(2), 149–172.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh051
Fraser, M. (2009). Five reasons for crash blindness. British Journalism Review, 20(4), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0956474809356852
Galbraith, J. K. (2004). The economics of innocent fraud: Truth for our time. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Galbraith, J. K. (2009). No return to normal. Economia Politica, 26(2), 191–201.
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–91. https://doi.org/
10.1177/002234336500200104
Goidel, R. K., & Langley, R. E. (1995). Media coverage of the economy and aggregate economic evaluations: Uncovering
evidence of indirect media effects. Political Research Quarterly, 48(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/
106591299504800205
Goidel, K., Procopio, S., Terrell, D., & Wu, D. (2010). Sources of economic news and economic expectations. American Politics
Research, 38(4), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09355671
Groß‐Klußmann, A., & Hautsch, N. (2011). When machines read the news: Using automated text analytics to quantify high
frequency news‐implied market reactions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(2), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jempfin.2010.11.009
Guerrera, F. (2009). Why generalists were not equipped to cover the complexities of the crisis. Ethical Space‐International
Journal of Communication Ethics, 6(3‐4), 43–49.
Hagen, L. M. (2005). Konjunkturnachrichten, Konjunkturklima und Konjunktur. In Wie sich die Wirtschaftsberichterstattung der
Massenmedien, Stimmungen der Bevölkerung und die aktuelle Wirtschaftslage wechselseitig beeinflussen. Eine transaktionale
Analyse. Köln: Halem.
Haller, H. B., & Norpoth, H. (1997). Reality bites: News exposure and economic opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(4),
555–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/297817
Hamilton, M. (2009). What we learned about the meltdown: Financial journalists saw the trees but not the forest. Columbia
Journalism Review, 47(5), 36–39.
Happer, C. (2017). Financialisation, media and social change. New Political Economy, 22(4), 437–449. https://doi.org/
10.1080/13563467.2017.1259301
Harcup, T., & O'neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/
10.1080/14616700118449
Harrington, D. E. (1989). Economic news on television: The determinants of coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(1), 17–40.
https://doi.org/10.1086/269139
Hester, J. B., & Gibson, R. (2003). The economy and second‐level agenda‐setting: A time‐series analysis of economic news
and public opinion about the economy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/
10.1177/107769900308000106
Hetherington, M. J. (1996). The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of
Political Science, 40(2), 372–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111629
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology,
94(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates
and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal ofPolitical Science,
38(4), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669333
Hollanders, D., & Vliegenthart, R. (2011). The influence of negative newspaper coverage on consumer confidence: The Dutch
case. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1430287
Hopkins, D. J., Kim, E., & Kim, S. (2017). Does newspaper coverage influence or reflect public perceptions of the economy?
Research & Politics, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017737900
Huxford, J. (2012). Reporting on recession: Journalism, prediction, and the economy. The International Business & Economics
Research Journal (Online), 11(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v11i3.6867
Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not‐so‐minimal” consequences of tele-
vision news programs. American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540018966X
Jensen, K. B. (1987). News as ideology: Economic statistics and political ritual in television network news. Journal of Commu-
nication, 37(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460‐2466.1987.tb00964.x
Ju, Y. (2008). The asymmetry in economic news coverage and its impact on public perception in South Korea. International
Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn021
12 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
Kalogeropoulos, A. (2017). Economic news and personal economic expectations. Mass Communication and Society. Advance
online publication. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1403629, 21, 248–265.
Kalogeropoulos, A., Albæk, E., De Vreese, C. H., & Van Dalen, A. (2015). The predictors of economic sophistication: Media,
interpersonal communication and negative economic experiences. European Journal of Communication, 30(4), 385–403.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115582149
Kalogeropoulos, A., Albæk, E., De Vreese, C. H., & Van Dalen, A. (2016). News priming and the changing economy: How eco-
nomic news influences government evaluations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edv048. https://doi.org/
10.1093/ijpor/edv048
Kalogeropoulos, A., Svensson, H. M., Van Dalen, A., De Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2014). Are watchdogs doing their busi-
ness? Media coverage of economic news. Journalism, 16(8), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914554167
Kantola, A. (2007). On the dark side of democracy: The global imaginary of financial journalism. In Reclaiming the media: Com-
munication rights and democratic media roles (p. 192). Bristoll: Intellect.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., Schultz, F., Oegema, D., & van Atteveld, W. (2013). Financial news and market panics in the age of high‐
frequency sentiment trading algorithms. Journalism, 14(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912468375
Knowles, S., Phillips, G., & Lidberg, J. (2017). Reporting the global financial crisis. A longitudinal tri‐nation study of mainstream
financial journalism. Journalism Studies, 18(3), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1058182
Kollmeyer, C. J. (2004). Corporate interests: How the news media portray the economy. Social Problems, 51(3), 432–452.
https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.3.432
Lamla, M. J., & Lein, S. M. (2014). The role of media for consumers' inflation expectation formation. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization, 106(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.05.004
Larcinese, V., Puglisi, R., & Snyder, J. M. (2011). Partisan bias in economic news: Evidence on the agenda‐setting behavior of
US newspapers. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1178–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.006
Lashmar, P. (2008). Subprime–The death of financial reporting or a failure of investigative journalism? The end of journalism?
Technology, education and ethics conference, University of Bedfordshire, 17–18 October.
Lewis‐Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science,
3(1), 183–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183
Lischka, J. A. (2016). Overall summary and conclusions. In Economic news, sentiment, and behavior (pp. 95–107). Wiesbaden,
Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Manning, P. (2013). Financial journalism, news sources, and the banking crisis. Journalism, 14(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1464884912448915
Marron, M. B., Sarabia‐Panol, Z., Sison, M. D., Rao, S., & Niekamp, R. (2010). The scorecard on reporting of the global financial
crisis. Journalism Studies, 11(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700903538413
McCarthy, K. J., & Dolfsma, W. (2014). Neutral media? Evidence of media bias and its economic impact. Review of Social
Economy, 72(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2013.806110
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda‐setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Mercille, J. (2013). The role of the media in fiscal consolidation programmes: The case of Ireland. Cambridge Journal of
Economics, 38(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet068
Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., Fan, D. P., & Amato, T. (1999). Elite economic forecasts, economic news, mass economic judgments,
and presidential approval. The Journal of Politics, 61(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647777
Philo, G. (1995). Television, politics and the rise of the New Right. In G. Philo (Ed.), Glasgow media group reader (Vol. 2) (pp.
198–233). London: Longman.
Philo, G., Miller, D., & Happer, C. (2015). Circuits of communication and structures of power: The sociology of the mass
media. In M. Holborn (Ed.), Contemporary sociology (pp. 444–470). London: Polity Press.
Pirie, I. (2012). Representations of economic crisis in contemporary Britain. British Politics, 7(4), 341–364. https://doi.org/
10.1057/bp.2012.15
Rafter, K. (2014). Voices in the crisis: The role of media elites in interpreting Ireland's banking collapse. European Journal of
Communication, 29(5), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114537787
Reese, S. D., Daly, J. A., & Hardy, A. P. (1987). Economic news on network television. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 137–144.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400119
Reich, Z. (2012). Different practices, similar logic: Comparing news reporting across political, financial, and territorial beats.
The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211420868
DAMSTRA ET AL. 13 of 14
Salgado, S., & Nienstedt, H. (2016). Euro crisis and plurality: Does the political orientation of newspapers determine the
selection and spin of information? European Journal of Communication, 31(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0267323116659977
Sanders, D. (2000). The real economy and the perceived economy in popularity functions: How much do voters need to
know? A study of British data, 1974–97. Electoral Studies, 19(2–3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261‐
3794(99)00052‐9
Schechter, D. (2009). Credit crisis: How did we miss it? British Journalism Review, 20(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0956474809104199
Schifferes, S. (2011). The future of financial journalism in the age of austerity. Inaugural lecture, 17 February. London: City
University. Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/49084191/The‐Future‐of‐Financial‐Journalism‐in‐the‐Age‐of‐
Austerity
Schifferes, S. (2012). Trust‐meltdown for business journalism. British Journalism Review, 23(2), 55–59. https://doi.org/
10.1177/0956474812450671
Schifferes, S., & Coulter, S. (2013). Downloading disaster: BBC news online coverage of the global financial crisis. Journalism,
14(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912460171
Schifferes, S., & Knowles, S. (2014). The British media and the ‘first crisis of globalization’. In The media and financial crises:
Comparative and historical perspectives (pp. 42–58). London: Routledge.
Schiffrin, A. (2015). The press and the financial crisis: A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 9(8), 639–653. https://
doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12288
Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2),
372–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐2508.2006.00413.x
Soroka, S. N. (2012). The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the real world. The Journal of
Politics, 74(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238161100171x
Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Soroka, S. N., Daku, M., Hiaeshutter‐Rice, D., Guggenheim, L., & Pasek, J. (2017). Negativity and positivity biases in economic
news coverage: Traditional versus social media. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/
10.1177/0093650217725870
Soroka, S. N., Stecula, D. A., & Wlezien, C. (2015). It's (change in) the (future) economy, stupid: Economic indicators, the
media, and public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12145
Starkman, D. (2009). Blindness: The media and the meltdown. Columbia Journalism Review, 48(1), 24–31.
Stein, H. (1975). Media distortions: A former official's view. Columbia Journalism Review, 13(6), 37.
Stevenson, R. L., Gonzenbach, W. J., & David, P. (1991). Economic recession and the news. Mass Communication Review, 21,
4–19.
Stimson, J. A. (1991). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings. Boulder: Westview Press.
Strauß, N. (2018). Financial journalism in today's high‐frequency news and information era. Journalism, Advance Online Pub-
lication, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917753556
Strauß, N., Vliegenthart, R., & Verhoeven, P. (2017). Intraday news trading: The reciprocal relationships between the stock
market and economic news. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217705528
Svensson, H. M., Albæk, E., Van Dalen, A., & De Vreese, C. (2017a). Good news in bad news: How negativity enhances
economic efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 1431–1447.
Svensson, H. M., Albæk, E., Van Dalen, A., & De Vreese, C. H. (2017b). The impact of ambiguous economic news on
uncertainty and consumer confidence. European Journal of Communication, 32(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0267323116677205
Tambini, D. (2010). What are financial journalists for? Journalism Studies, 11(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/
14616700903378661
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2007). Agenda‐setting effects among the media, the public, and congress, 1946–2004. Journalism &
Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400405
Tett, G. (2009). Silos and silences: Why so few people spotted the problems in complex credit and what that implies for the
future. Financial Stability Review, (14), 121–129.
Thompson, P. A. (2013). Invested interests? Reflexivity, representation and reporting in financial markets. Journalism, 14(2),
208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912474201
Tracy, J. F. (2012). COVERING “FINANCIAL TERRORISM” The Greek debt crisis in US news media. Journalism Practice, 6(4),
513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.633789
14 of 14 DAMSTRA ET AL.
Tumber, H. (1993). Selling scandal': business and the media. Media, Culture & Society, 15(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/
10.1177/016344393015003002
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2),
207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010‐0285(73)90033‐9
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Usher, N. (2012). Ignored, uninterested, and the blame game: How The New York Times, Marketplace, and TheStreet
distanced themselves from preventing the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Journalism, 14(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1464884912455904
Van Dalen, A., De Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2015). Economic news through the magnifying glass. Journalism Studies, 18(7),
890–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1089183
Van Dalen, A., De Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2016). Mediated Uncertainty: The negative impact of uncertainty in economic
news on consumer confidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw039
Vliegenthart, R., & Van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of
Communication, 26(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838
Wattenberg, B. J. (1985). The good news is, the bad news is wrong. New York: American Enterprise Institute.
Whitten‐Woodring, J. (2009). Watchdog or lapdog? Media freedom, regime type, and government respect for human rights.
International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐2478.2009.00548.x
Winter, J. P. (1981). Contingent conditions in the agenda‐setting process. Mass Communication Review Yearbook 2 (pp. 235–
243). Newbury Park, California: Sage
Wu, H. D., McCracken, M. W., & Saito, S. (2004). Economic communication in the ‘Lost Decade’ news coverage and the
Japanese recession. International Communication Gazette, 66(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204041474
Wu, D. H., Stevenson, R. L., Chen, H., & Güner, Z. N. (2002). The conditioned impact of recession news: A time‐series analysis
of economic communication in the United States, 1987–1996. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(1),
19–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.1.19
Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(2),
109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136
Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. Communication Yearbook, 2, 225–240. https://doi.org/
10.1080/23808985.1978.11923728
Alyt Damstra is currently a PhD student at the Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of
Amsterdam. Her research focuses on the causes and consequences of economic news coverage.
Mark Boukes (PhD, 2015) is postdoctoral researcher at the Amsterdam School of Communication Research, Uni-
versity of Amsterdam. His research focuses on media effects, in particular of soft news, infotainment, and eco-
nomic news.
Rens Vliegenthart (PhD, 2007) is a full professor Media and Society at the Amsterdam School of Communication
Research. His research interests are economic news effects, media‐politics relations, and media coverage of social
movements, election campaigns, European integration, and the economic crisis.
How to cite this article: Damstra A, Boukes M, Vliegenthart R. The economy. How do the media cover it and
what are the effects? A literature review. Sociology Compass. 2018;e12579. https://doi.org/10.1111/
soc4.12579
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR?
Damian Tambini
In order to understand why so little media attention was paid to risks in the banking sector in the
run up to the financial crisis, we need to understand the framework of law, regulation, self-
regulation and professional incentives that structure the practice of financial and business
journalism. This paper focuses in particular on what role financial journalists play in the system of
corporate governance, the ways in which law and regulation recognize that role, and the extent
to which this role is accepted and understood by financial journalists themselves. The first part of
the essay reviews recent debate on financial journalism and investigates the role of financial
journalism from a systemic perspective: looking at its role in corporate governance, and its impact
on market behaviour. I develop the notion that financial and business journalists operate within a
framework of rights and duties which institutionalize a particular ethical approach to their role.
The second half of the article, which draws more extensively on interviews conducted with
journalists and editors, asks how journalists themselves understand and describe their role and
what they see as the key challenges they face as they attempt to perform it. It emerges that there
is no consensus among financial and business journalists about their ‘‘watchdog’’ role in relation
to markets and corporate behaviour, and whilst the financial journalists interviewed tended to
agree on the key challenges they face, they are uncertain how to respond to them.
Critics claim that CNBC’s on-screen personalities led the charge into the speculative
stocks of the 1990s, stocks that eventually imploded. There are professional questions, as
well, about the network’s cheerleading coverage of Wall Streeters who were extolling
stocks that those same analysts were privately calling ‘‘crap.’’ The Merrill Lynch analyst
Henry Blodget, for one example, had been a frequent guest on CNBC. His Internet stocks
all came crashing down, and eventually it was learned that he’d been recommending
stocks on-air that he privately called ‘‘junk’’ . . . Alan Abelson, the respected financial
columnist of Barron’s, comes down hard on the channel. ‘‘CNBC,’’ he says bluntly, ‘‘was a
product of the stockmarket mania. They contributed to it, and they ate off it’’. (Brady,
2003, p. 50)
Whilst questions should be asked about the complex ethical conflicts and more subtle
conflicts of interest behind this ‘‘bubble’’ journalism, most see financial journalism’s
weakness as cock up rather than conspiracy. Gillian Doyle (2006, p. 433) questions the level
of training and skill among business journalists. Many of the financial journalists she
interviewed said that as financial products become more complex it is difficult to find
journalists with the expertise to adequately understand the material they are reporting on.
Aeron Davis’ research, based on interviews with fund managers, brokers, and other
interested parties in 20022004, similarly reports perceptions of a lack of expertise and of
critical reflection by journalists (Davis, 2007, pp. 1634).
Gillian Doyle argues that a lack of skills among journalists as markets become more
complex undermines journalists’ ability to hold companies to account (Doyle, 2006,
p. 442). According to a news editor interviewed by Doyle: ‘‘financial journalists are
generally good at analysing companies and interpreting and maintaining companies at
arms length. Where they are less good, however, is in pro-actively investigating stories*in
stepping back to see the wider picture and spotting things that deserve a closer look. This
is because they don’t have the time and the opportunity and perhaps the education and
training needed to be more pro-active’’ (Doyle, 2006, p. 442). Similarly, several financial
journalists and editors interviewed for this article raised the issue of the lack of specialist
training for financial analysis. ‘‘The people that are really skilled go and make loads of
money working in the financial sector. Not writing about it’’, one respondent said.
The challenges faced by financial journalists were well illustrated during 20079
when only a very few individuals, notably Gillian Tett of the Financial Times, spotted the
crisis coming. Financial journalism is accused of giving a partial view of the business world.
But is it a distorted one? Do the financial media, as Peter Wilby (2007) asserts, ‘‘present the
world through a middle aged, middle-class prism’’? Wilby’s charge is that in reporting
financial issues, for example house prices, there is a tendency to frame issues as though
what was ‘‘good news’’ was uncontroversial. As those who wish to buy, but not sell houses
know very well, price hikes are not good news for everyone. For those journalists that
aspire to ‘‘public interest’’ coverage, just what interest should they serve is a very complex
issue: should they serve investors? Or the ‘‘rationality’’ of the market? Only exceptional
individuals will actively want to be the one that burst the bubble.
Critics of the current state of UK financial and business journalism thus tend to focus
on the problem of a skills and resources gap. And whilst the shifting relationship of power
between political journalists and politicians is much discussed (see John Lloyd, 2004 and
Nick Jones, 1999), the similar standoff that occurs between financial journalists and their
sources has been subject to less discussion. One very real problem is that interested
parties*including corporate executives and analysts*sometimes constitute the only
repositories of relevant data and employ the main experts. With the help of proactive PR,
information can be controlled despite the fact that*as we have found*ultimately the
financial system is a public matter that affects us all. Dyck and Zingales describe the
relationship between financial journalists and their sources in terms of a quid pro quo
situation: access to information is granted; but only on condition that stories are presented
in the required manner (2003, pp. 16). Sources exert their control through granting/
denying of access, the potential for treating, threat of lawsuits.
The charges levelled against current financial journalism: of capture and of
superficiality, and of lack of skills, are of course based on the assumption that financial
journalists should play an independent, ‘‘watchdog’’ role. Since this is not a consensus
160 DAMIAN TAMBINI
view, even among journalists, it is worth making this explicit. Might the problem not be
that markets are increasingly complex, or that journalists are insufficiently funded? Perhaps
business and financial journalists themselves do not see themselves as engaged in ‘‘public
interest’’ reporting in the same way that political journalists do.
The interviews conducted for this project, perhaps surprisingly, showed a consider-
able lack of consensus about whether, and to what extent, business and financial
journalists should seek to serve a wider public interest. One way of examining this
question theoretically is to ask what it is that our corporate governance structure asks of
financial journalism. Obviously there are no formal, legal responsibilities placed on
journalists; but after high-profile failures such as Enron and Northern Rock, we might ask
how financial journalism fits in to a general framework of checks and balances on business.
responsibility as being to respect the law and serve the shareholders of their companies,
not to plug gaps in the system of corporate oversight.
I will return to this disconnect between a systemic view of business journalism, and
the reality of professional practice below. In the following section I shift perspective,
looking at the direct and powerful impacts that financial news can have on market
behaviour and the implications of this for the regulation, role and responsibilities of
financial journalists.
One reason that a peculiar ethics and regulatory framework applies to financial
journalism is that business news can have a very direct and powerful impact on market
behaviour*with the ‘‘city slickers’’ case the most pungent recent reminder. On one hand,
the fact that journalists may be in a position to abuse their influence has led to detailed
regulation, some of which will be examined in detail in the next section. On the other
hand, there is a more diffuse and less researched notion that journalists should avoid
‘‘panicking’’ markets, or contributing to irrational behaviour, a notion much debated after
the Northern Rock debacle.
Measurement of the impact of news on stock prices is a well-established field of
research which involves a number of distinct approaches. The research originates mainly in
discussions about what makes markets move*rather than discussions about what impact
changing media technologies might have. And there are specific literatures on policy
issues such as central bank transparency (Connolly and Kohler, 2004; Reeves and Sawicki,
2007). Some researchers treat events (announcements for example, release of information)
as ‘‘news’’, whilst others attempt to separate out the fact of coverage in news media as the
key variable, asking whether the fact of coverage has an independent and measurable
effect (Dyck and Zingales, 2003, p. 2).
There is, however, a danger of media centrism: of prioritising the impact of media
coverage beyond the range of other factors on market outcomes (see Dyck and Zingales,
2003). Barber and Odean (2006) find that individual investors tend to be net buyers of
shares on ‘‘high attention days’’. The important finding in this US-based research is that
the tendency on such days is for institutional investors to be net sellers of those stocks
whereas individual investors buy. The authors hypothesize that this is due to the limited
information available to investors and ‘‘bounded rationality’’. Other research into the
relationship between reporting and market behaviour examined the market impact of a
survey of the ‘‘Worst Boards’’ published in Business Week in the United States. Interestingly,
the results showed positive short-term share price gains even among companies identified
as the worst boards. The short-term gains did subsequently reverse, however (Joe et al.,
2009, p. 19). Other authors concern themselves with the problem of what influences
investment decisions and the extent to which news reporting might be a factor.
It is useful to keep in mind these two systemic views of the role of financial
journalists: first in terms of their role in corporate governance and secondly in terms of
their role in relation to markets and particularly capital markets when considering the
162 DAMIAN TAMBINI
responsibilities of financial journalists. On one hand, they indicate a wider watchdog role
for journalists in the system of corporate governance; and on the other, they show that the
reflexive nature of the relationship with markets requires a particular ethical approach.
In the following sections I describe financial journalism as a combination of various
hard won rights and privileges that are granted in recognition of the social role that
financial and business journalists are seen to play. This approach draws on Osiel’s (1986)
study of the professionalization of journalism in its understanding of the relationship
between law, self-regulation and professional practices (see also Hallin and Mancini, 2004).
Whilst journalists themselves, particularly in the United Kingdom often reject the notion
that they have institutionalized professional responsibilities, I argue that such a position is
untenable as it is possible to demonstrate that the legal and self-regulatory framework
within which journalists work sets out and reinforces such responsibilities. In order to
understand current challenges in the profession, it is useful to consider the longer-term
context: business and financial journalism has evolved a clear set of professional rights and
responsibilities which reflect (1) the role of financial journalism in the broader system of
corporate governance; (2) the reflexive relationship between news and markets; and (3)
the codification of the resulting set of roles and responsibilities in law and self-regulatory
codes.
1. Insider Trading
Trading on the basis of information that is not in the public domain. Notoriously
hard to define, this impacts on journalists when they may be party to private information
prior to publication, and may at that point take part in trades that would be illegal. Under
the Financial Services and Markets Act, Market Abuse can involve
behaviour [that] is based on information which is not generally available to those using
the market but which, if available to a regular user of the market, would or would be
likely to be regarded by him as relevant when deciding the terms on which transactions
in investments of the kind in question should be effected. (s118.2.a)
2. Market Manipulation
One variant of this, known as ‘‘share ramping’’, was at the heart of the Daily Mirror
‘‘City Slickers’’ case. Because of the strong influence that certain media can have on prices,
it is possible for certain players to impact prices through recommendation and thereby
profit by selling shares on in the short term. Readers who invest do so in inappropriately
inflated stock and are likely to lose money when prices correct.
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 163
3. Conflicts of Interest
All journalism has to face issues of conflict of interest, but such issues are particularly
pronounced in relation to financial journalism. The interest of the reader, investor or
market may be in conflict with the private interest of the journalist if, for example, the
journalist or an associate has a shareholding or some other stake in a company they are
reporting. The temptation may be to withhold information that could hurt the company in
question or publish information that favours it, or engage in profit-driven market
manipulation.
4. Non-disclosure
Where journalists do have an interest, they are obliged under relevant codes (such as
the Market Abuse Directive) to disclose the identity of the producers of the recommenda-
tion, and any interests that the producer might have in the recommended investment.
Most established financial news providers operate in addition a policy of internal disclosure
whereby any stocks held are disclosed to a key manager or editor who can monitor
whether the journalist is as a result placed in conflict of interest as regards stories that are
covered by that journalist.
For each of these four key ethical challenges there are layers of overlapping
regulation and self-regulation including:
. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
. Industry codes such as the PCC Code and Guidance on Financial Journalism.
. The Investment Recommendation (Media) Regulations 2005 (Statutory Instrument 2005
No. 382).
There are, of course, many other ethical issues. Some of these (such as accuracy,
honesty) are covered by general journalism ethics codes, and some are contained within
specialist codes such as the Press Complaints Commissions’ (PCC) 2005 Best Practice Note
on Financial Journalism. In addition, most established leaders in financial news have their
own guidance and codes of conduct. These do cover issues relating to conflicts of interest,
and independence of journalists, but also deal with other issues such as whether stock
tipping is encouraged and working for other organizations.
hand, journalists do have some informal immunity (for example in terms of their ability to
protect their sources) in the light of the role they play in corporate governance.
Journalists are therefore treated as a special case, and in the United Kingdom they
enjoy a system of formal and informal regulatory and legal privileges. On one hand, because
of the particular role that news reporting plays, journalism is recognized in European
Convention on Human Rights jurisprudence as worthy of special protection (Castendyck
et al., 2008, p. 46). Whether the fact that courts tend to afford a lower level of protection to
commercial speech than political speech may be relevant to the framework for financial
journalism: it may be that journalists who are obviously fulfilling a public interest role are
more protected by free speech rights. Where issues of free speech are likely to arise, in the
United Kingdom as in the United States, is in relation to source protection (Osiel, 1986). UK
financial regulators have developed informal and formal procedures that go beyond the
protection afforded by the European Court in terms, for example, of the protection of
sources. This means that whilst non-journalists (and we might include bloggers in this
category*though this is less clear) could be obliged to reveal sources to a regulator,
professional journalists under the PCC or Ofcom regimes are much less likely to be. Research
on the historical emergence of these privileges and duties is beyond the scope of this essay,
but it is useful to note two cases which illustrate the slow formalization of one journalistic
privilege: the right to protect sources.
Following a 2006 dispute with the Wall Street Journal over a case relating to
Overstock.com, the US regulator formalized its approach to working with journalists. Policy
Document SEC 34-53638 sets out a set of rules and procedures that the SEC should follow
before they subpoena a journalist to force her to reveal her sources. SEC officials should:
try to obtain information first from alternative sources, determine if the information really
is essential to the case, and should contact the journalist’s legal counsel in the first
instance rather than the journalist directly, in order to ascertain how important the
information is, and the extent to which other sources have been exhausted. In announcing
this new doctrine the SEC director was quick to point out that the SEC strongly supported
freedom of the press. Cox argued that his agency ‘‘relies on aggressive investigative
journalism to uncover wrongdoing in companies. Therefore, the SEC should do nothing to
chill that work.’’ Cox said ‘‘Financial journalists need to understand that the SEC considers
them vital partners in our mission’’ (Orange County Register, 6 March 2006).
In the United Kingdom, the equivalent moment in which a line in the regulatory sand
was drawn was in relation to the Interbrew case, in which the Guardian newspaper found
itself in contempt of court after refusing to hand over documents relating to a leaked story
about a merger involving a large drinks company. In this case too, the regulator (UK
regulator, the Financial Services Authority) established a doctrine relating to protection of
sources, but, in the case of the United Kingdom, this remains informal and unwritten.
Both regulators, in establishing these doctrines, recognized the public interest
functions that journalists can play, such as holding companies to account and
investigating illegal behaviour. Insofar as they do provide these benefits they should be
helped by regulators rather than hindered, for example, by scaring off potential sources;
hence journalists are granted privileges of source protection.2
Protection of sources is only one aspect of the privileges that are extended to
financial journalists in recognition*and this is the crucial point*of their role in corporate
governance and the wider public interest. The majority of privileges that financial
journalists enjoy are in fact those enjoyed by all journalists, and include the notion of
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 165
The press discharges vital functions as a bloodhound a well as a watchdog. The court
should be slow to conclude that a publication was not in the public interest and,
therefore, the public had no right to know especially when the information is in the field
of political discussion. Any lingering doubts should be resolved in favour of publication.
(Reynolds vs Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] 3 ALL ER 961).
Whilst judges do tend to err on the side of free speech, the key implication here is
whether financial journalists that reject both bloodhound and watchdog roles should
enjoy privilege, and whether bloggers and others might also benefit.
So whilst interviews for this project uncovered a somewhat patchy notion among
journalists of any social or ethical responsibility to act as a watchdog, it is in recognition of
this role that journalistic privileges have been granted. Whether, and how rights and duties
might be conditional on one another, for example, is a question that is too broad to be
addressed in this short article. The interviews conducted for the project tried to elucidate
exactly how journalists viewed their role, and the challenges they faced in the attempt to
fulfil it. It is to this material that we now turn.
Speed
Pressure for increased productivity has prompted journalists to write more stories in
less time than before. Some things have got easier, such as the availability of data online
and accessibility of sources, but, on the other hand, the expectation is that material will be
published as soon as possible, regardless of print deadlines or broadcast bulletins. Most
journalists agree that this leads to intense professional pressures: both in terms of the
degree of senior editorial oversight before publication and in terms of the extent to which
additional sources can be accessed and verification standards maintained. Many
166 DAMIAN TAMBINI
respondents claimed that journalists were forced as a result to rely on a narrower range of
established news sources such as PR companies.
Our readers want information at 6.00, 7.00 or 8.00 in the morning . . . On the newspaper
the moment when a piece of news has been delivered to, say, the news editor, it’ll
go through the whole process of . . . news editing, sub editing, copy proof, whatever, go
through that process and sending to the print site, put it on the page. That’ll take two,
three hours, OK [on our site], because we’re a very small team using quick, light, web-
based technology, the production process takes about two or three minutes. So, it’s fast,
ultra-fast. That again changes the way you write.
The processes through which facts are verified, judgements of news value reached,
and reports are selected for publication are likely to have significant consequences for
individual companies, investors, employees and potentially for the broader economy.
There is a trade-off between speed and attention to ethics and it is one where financial
journalism has yet to find a new equilibrium of accepted practices. Getting the balance
wrong could lead to Financial Journalism as a profession becoming irrelevant. According
to a leading Fund Manager:
There is this . . . vicious downward circle: you have fewer journalists paid less with less
time and they don’t have the luxury of spending the time you need to come up with
information that is required. So it becomes less useful to people like me. We ignore it
increasingly and it becomes sort of marginalized.
These pressures of time are not peculiar to business journalists, but are of course
widely noted tendencies of contemporary journalism. Coupled with some of the other
trends reported by interviewees, however, the increased pressures on journalists’ time may
be undermining the ability of business and financial journalists to fulfil an effective public
interest function.
Complexity
Financial stories are more complex and specialist than ever before. In the hand
wringing following the collapse of Enron, some journalists admitted that the degree of
complexity in the structure of Enron’s business baffled them. Those covering the credit
crunch and the Northern Rock stories also required specialist knowledge if they were to form
an independent view. The lack of skills of this type among journalists adds to the reliance on
intermediaries and news professionals to ‘‘interpret’’ and explain stories for journalists.
According to BBC Business Editor Robert Peston, the financial media could have
done more to foresee some of the problems resulting from the credit crunch and
complexity is part of the problem:
The financial press has typically focused too much on equity markets and not enough on
debt markets . . . For many months, I was very concerned about the explosive growth of
CDOs [Collateralized Debt Obligations] and I tried to explain them through my reporting.
Doing so was a challenge, when even bankers creating the CDOs were unable to describe
them in terms that make sense to non-specialists.4
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 167
Strategy
Increasing pressures of speed, complexity and productivity add to the constant
challenge for journalists: namely to ensure that they are not used in the service of
someone else’s interests, but report in the public interest or at least the interests of their
readers. Business and financial PR has become much more important in the field in recent
years.
Professional strategy advice, in the form of financial PR, has become a high-margin,
rapid-growth industry in recent decades. In 1986, British companies spent £37 million on
financial PR. A decade later the annual figure had risen to £250 million (Michie, 1998, p. 26).
The evidence is that the past decade has seen similar or perhaps larger rates of growth.
Industry sources estimate that financial PR consultancies can command fees up to 1 per
cent of the bid values in merger and acquisition deals (Miller and Dinan, 2000).
The current credit crisis is considered to be the greatest challenge of the industry
and the professionals predict that the merger business will pick up only at the end of the
decade. Even so, the financial PR industry as a whole managed a revenue increase in 2007.
On PR Week’s top 150 UK PR consultancies league, listed companies’ fee income saw an
average 22 per cent increase (PR Week, 2008). The industry is dominated by a few agencies.
Brunswick tops the league in Mergermarket’s 2006 table of pan-European PR advisers after
advising on 146 deals worth £177.8 billion (Mergermarket, 2007). Brunswick, the largest
financial PR company in the United Kingdom had almost a third of FTSE 100 companies on
its books. Finsbury, Financial Dynamics, Citigate and Maitland hold the spots from the
second to the fifth, all advising on deals worth over £100 billion.
One editor with a long experience in the United Kingdom saw the rise of financial PR
as the single most important change to have taken place in recent years:
In the last ten, twenty years I suppose the biggest change has been the rise of the
financial intermediary, financial public relations services. They are putting up barriers to
information. I think they were always around but they’ve developed and become much
more sophisticated. When I first came across them they were really kind of press cutting
services. But now they are really strategy advisors. And there are some company directors
that do not talk or answer phone calls without consulting them. And they have
enormous power. In many ways, they set the agenda. They are the access point. They are
making these people available for interviews or they don’t make them available for
interviews. They release information in a, what’s the word, in a way which is carefully
orchestrated to happen . . . Things are very controlled in a way compared with the way it
used to be . . . the free flow of information has been interrupted and the kind of
information we get can be very sanitized. It’s very hard getting to the bottom of a story.
One former financial PR professional claimed that there was increasing co-
dependency between PR and journalists, as journalists are under time pressure to get
stories, and PR now controls access to the larger companies that control most of the larger
168 DAMIAN TAMBINI
stories: ‘‘the papers couldn’t exist without financial PRs pushing stories to them everyday
because they just don’t have many stories’’.
Journalists are, of course, aware of such strategies. The business editor of a national
newspaper admitted: ‘‘I love the leaks. Some of the leaks are obviously done to protect
insider shares or to manipulate the share price. There is no question in my mind about
that. But it is much more difficult to do today than 10 years ago’’. There is a clash here
between different aspects of professional and ethical responsibility on the part of the
journalist. The journalist must get the story, and the leak is great news from that point of
view. Presumably, if the story is big enough, who cares that the journalist is being put to
instrumental use. In that context, the journalist may reason, perhaps the fewer questions
asked about why the leak has been made, the better.
The more seasoned journalists reveal a distaste for dealing with PR when pressed on
the matter.
Because if PR give it to you it means they want something. I don’t particularly like it. If
people give me stories I will be happy but I will stand them up. I try not to be used or
manipulated. I don’t want to be used. A lot of PR companies try to trade with journalists
so it is always very subtle. They say ‘‘we will give you this now’’ then they might want
something nice written about their clients. It does happen. But I don’t like it.
According to one former editor of a national newspaper: ‘‘some financial PRs simply
tell whoppers . . . Friendship is a potential corruptor so PR must be kept at arms’ length’’.
London financial news is particularly susceptible to capture by PR according to one
financial journalist who had worked in several countries ‘‘people are spoon-fed here in
London. The financial PR industry is very developed. In Hong Kong journalists have direct
access to people operating in the market’’, ‘‘PR can be a big problem for journalists. They
[PR] selectively release information and then can block any further access. They can deny
access to company briefings, AGMs and profit warning briefings’’.
This would seem to support Gillian Doyle’s description of business news production
according to which ‘‘corporations vie with each other for the attention of a target audience
mostly composed of investors. In so doing, they dominate or ‘capture’ business and financial
news agendas to the exclusion of all other interests’’ (Doyle, 2006, p. 435; see also Davis, 2005).
Whilst problems of spin and bias do create challenges for journalists; one very real
problem is that interested parties*including corporate executives and analysts*do
sometimes constitute the main repositories of data and the main experts. Dyck and
Zingales describe the relationship between financial journalists and their sources in terms
of a quid pro quo situation, and one analogous to recent critical views of political
journalism: access to information is granted; but only on condition that stories are
presented in the required manner (Dyck and Zingales, 2003, pp. 16).
The combination of increasing complexity and increasing impact of communications
professionals is a powerful double whammy for financial journalists. According to a
leading business editor:
Editor: Well, I think, you know, there is a risk that any journalist can swallow lines from
the . . . public relations people and so on but you need to be sceptical. But you know it’s
about picking all the information hopefully from the source, and not to take it all so
seriously.
Interviewer: With all the complexity you talked about, has it become more difficult to do
that?
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 169
Editor: It is more difficult. Yeah. But, you know, there is a lot of going on which you don’t
understand and which we can’t get at because of that complexity. That does make it a bit
harder. But you know, what we are reporting on most of the time is takeovers, and
companies’ results, regular trading statements, and so on. We are all writing about the
same statement. You need to ask all the right questions.
The huge investment of energy and uncertain outcome associated with investigative
reporting means that, for most financial media in the UK at least, this is supported only
on an occasional basis rather than as a routine activity. So long as this remains the case,
the opportunities for media to play a role in uncovering frauds such as Enron will be
limited. (Doyle, 2005, p. 443)
Putting two or three people onto a project for a month where at the end of it you might
get nothing in terms of material is something that we would think very hard about doing,
because it is expensive . . . We used to have a small investigative unit, we don’t really
anymore.
A lack of resources would seem likely to impact on quality and, in particular, accuracy.
Standards of verification and sourcing vary outlet by outlet. Very few outlets will commit
to the industry gold standard of two named sources for each story*for the simple reasons
that sometimes one person in the right position is enough to verify a story, particularly if it
involves that person*and time is scarce. It appeared that journalists are aware of the
market impact of their reporting*both its impact on individual companies and on market
170 DAMIAN TAMBINI
sentiment more broadly. When journalists were questioned about whether this would
affect their verification of a story there was a mixed response. Some indicated that they
might be less inclined to publish a story at all until they were very sure of its veracity if
they thought it may have an immediate impact on job losses, for instance. Others
admitted that they might be inclined to adopt higher verification standards if the story
was likely to have an immediate market impact.
Editor: There are rumours of private equity interest in a company called X. Now if it was
true that the private equity group was going to buy X it would be on the front page of
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 171
the newspaper because it would be confirmed, checked news. It would be a big story.
But at the moment it is just among the market chatter. So, traditionally, this sort of
information would be within the market reports . . . Because we are working online in
this instant messaging format, we print the same material but it HAS instant effects.
Normally, the story which comes to the newspaper is printed in the middle of the night,
turned over by the news wires. By the morning, people can take a view, a quite leisurely
view on whether it’s true or not true. Or the story might have moved on in some way.
When you print it live in IM conversation, nobody has any time to check. And so the story
can have a sort of exaggerated effect in terms of moving the prices. That brings with it
huge responsibilities. Because if the story is wrong you can be moving prices falsely. If
you say something is true which is not true . . . And it means you have to be 100 per cent
squeaky clean. Because people automatically believe you can be guilty of manipulating
the stock market. So you have to be completely open. You have to write your doubts of
the story . . . You have to be make it very clear to the reader what sorts of information
you are talking about, how firm the information is and literally you have to tell the reader
everything you know. If there’s any sense you’re holding back the information you
immediately look like you are manipulating the market in some way. You might not
actually doing anything bad but the perception would still be there. That means we
could never be seen to have any investment of our own.
Interviewer: So you have to be very clean.
Editor: One hundred per cent, squeaky clean.
Interviewer: That means you don’t own any stocks.
Editor: No. I only have debts.
The site being discussed is in fact subject to the PCC code as it is operated by a
national newspaper. Others are not, and as the interviewee acknowledges, this could lead
to pushing the regulatory and ethical boundaries. ‘‘We abide by all the values which go
with this newspaper . . . Yet at some point, somebody . . . if [the site] sat under someone
else’s umbrella, we could be abused because the technology allows you to speak to a lot
of people’’. The implicit assumption here is that the (self)-regulatory framework that
professional print and broadcast journalists are subject to is an effective foil against abuse
of journalistic power, for example through market abuse. There is a need for more clarity
about who is operating within the professional and ethical framework of financial
journalism, particularly with regard to Internet content.
Conclusions
Financial and business journalists, like other journalists, sometimes deny that they
are part of an organized ‘‘profession’’. But this paper has sought to show that whilst
financial journalists are reluctant to accept it, they do have a clear institutional role in the
broader financial system. A simple way to understand this role is to see it as a framework
of rights and duties that have been developed in the context of legal and regulatory
disputes and which form the institutional framework which governs and shapes
professional practice. In return for the social function they perform, financial journalists
are granted professional privileges.
Interviews conducted for this research support the view that many financial and
business journalists lack awareness about the professional and institutional framework
within which they operate. They hold a range of opinions about their ethical responsibilities
172 DAMIAN TAMBINI
and broader governance role. Interviewees’ responses also show that financial journalism is
under intense pressure because of the challenges of increased complexity of financial and
business news, together with industry changes that put pressure on the funding of
investigations and the time available to professionals in fulfilling their duties. The powerful
role that strategic PR has come to play in the financial and business journalism sector
constitutes another key challenge. And in addition the profession faces two key strategic
questions. One is how to respond to the question of professional closure as bloggers
and other new media services compete with established financial news sources. Another is
the question of what role financial news journalism seeks in the broader settlement for
corporate governance. As the regulatory response to the financial crisis of 20079 is
designed, debate on the appropriate balance between legal and extralegal enforcement will
entail a debate about the role of public*and therefore journalistic*oversight. The
privileges extended to financial journalists, and the duties that are expected in return,
should be part of that debate.
This could be an opportunity to revisit a broader debate about what role journalists
should play in the overall framework of corporate governance: not only unearthing cases
of fraud, but providing the balanced and sceptical news and comment that deflates
bubbles and helps avoid market irrationality. In the current environment, pressures of time
and resources are in danger of undermining business journalism in general, and the ability
of financial journalists to find a way through the current impasse. The long-standing
pressures on business journalism, such as sustainability, source dependency and pressure
from PR, are exacerbated by the economic pressures that undermine risk taking, together
with the increased complexity of financial markets and the pressure for rapid publication.
The response to this impasse was beyond the scope of the interviews conducted for this
phase of the research, but we might speculate about possible ways forward. Journalists
could respond by seeking regulatory support to enable them to fulfil their role, for
example by reducing defamation risk. Radical solutions are being discussed about new
ways of funding journalism, and these will inevitably entail judgements about what
constitutes good journalism, and whether business journalism qualifies. Given the range of
the challenges they face, journalists will need to work together and pool resources if they
are to strike a new compact about their rights and duties in the new environment, and to
whom these rights and duties should be extended.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
An earlier version of this essay was published as a pamphlet by Polis/London School of
Economics in December 2008. I am grateful to Charlie Beckett, director of Polis, and the
participants in two workshops organized by Polis for comments. I am also grateful for
Isabelle Cao Lijun, Terence Kiff, Eva Knoll, Judy Lin and Gladys Tang for research
assistance.
NOTES
1. Interviews were carried out with the PCC director and data on official complaints reveals
a lack of complaints against this article of the code. In the first 10 months of 2007, there
were two complaints: one did not breach the Code and the other was dropped by the
complainant. In 2006 there were three, of which two did not breach the Code and one
WHAT ARE FINANCIAL JOURNALISTS FOR? 173
was dropped. In 2005 there were four, two of which were not pursued by the
complainant while two accepted some offer of action by the editor (information supplied
by the PCC).
2. I am grateful for information provided by former Wall Street Journal general counsel
Stuart Karle and Howard Davies, Director LSE and former Director, Financial Services
Authority.
3. Methodological note: semi-structured interviews were conducted mainly by the author,
and some were conducted by researchers working with him according to a semi-
structured interview guide focusing on the role of the business journalist and challenges
faced in performing that role. They lasted between 30 and 65 minutes and were recorded
and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed for the main themes they focused on, and the
key challenges identified form the structure of the following report. Interviewees
consisted of the most senior financial and business journalists in the United Kingdom,
some of whom requested anonymity which has been granted to all interviewees for
consistency. The list of interviewees is available from the author. (Additional comparative
material has been provided as background from interviews conducted with financial
journalists in New York and Hong Kong which will be published separately.)
4. Robert Peston quotes are from an interview conducted by Terence Kiff for an MSc
dissertation, Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics,
July/August 2008. I am grateful to Terence for supplying the transcript.
REFERENCES
BARBER, BRAD M. and ODEAN, TERRANCE (2006) ‘‘All That Glitters:the effect of attention and news on
the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors’’, EFA 2005 Moscow Meetings,
http://ssrn.com/abstract460660.
BORDEN, MICHAEL J. (2007) ‘‘The Role of Financial Journalists in Corporate Governance’’, Fordham
Journal of Corporate and Financial Law XII, pp. 31270.
BRADY, RAY (2003) ‘‘Makeover; CNBC Fell from Grace When the Bubble Burst. How does it look
now?’’, Columbia Journalism Review November/December.
CASTENDYCK, OLIVER, DOMMERING, EGBERT and SCHEUER, ALEXANDER (2008) European Media Law,
Dordrecht: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business.
CONNOLLY, E. and KOHLER, M. (2004) ‘‘News and Interest Rate Expectations: a study of six central
banks’’, Research discussion paper 2004-10, http://www.rba.gov.au/rdp/RDP2004-10.pdf.
DAVIS, AERON (2005) ‘‘Media Effects and the Active Elite Audience: a study of media in financial
markets’’, European Journal of Communication 20(3), pp. 30326.
DAVIS, AERON (2007) ‘‘Economic Inefficiency of Market Liberalisation: the case of the London
Stock Exchange’’, Global Media and Communication 3(2), pp. 15778.
DOYLE, GILLIAN (2006) ‘‘Financial News Journalism: a post-Enron analysis of approaches towards
economic and financial news production in the UK’’, Journalism 7(4), pp. 43352.
DYCK, ALEXANDER and ZINGALES, LUIGI (2003) ‘‘The Media and Asset Prices’’, Working paper, Harvard
Business School.
HALLIN, DANIEL C. and MANCINI, PAOLO (2004) Comparing Media Systems: three models of media and
politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JOE, JENNIFER, LOUIS, HENOCK and ROBINSON, DAHLIA (2009) ‘‘Managers’ and Investors’ Responses to
Media Exposure of Board Ineffectiveness’’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
44, pp. 579605.
174 DAMIAN TAMBINI
JONES, NICK (1999) Sultans of Spin. The media and the New Labour government, London: Orion.
KLAUSNER, MICHAEL (2005) ‘‘The Limits of Corporate Law in Promoting Good Corporate
Governance’’, in: Jaw W. Lorsch, Leslie Berlowitz and Andy Zelleke (Eds), Restoring Trust
in American Business. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 9198.
LLOYD, JOHN (2004) What the Media Are Doing to Our Politics, London: Constable and Robinson.
MERGERMARKET (2007) ‘‘Press Release: Mergermarket’s Year End 2006 House League Tables of
Financial PR Advisers to European M&A’’, http://cnc-ag.com/pdf/en/Press-Release-for-PR-
Advisers-Q4-2006-Europe.pdf.
MICHIE, DAVID (1998) The Invisible Persuaders: how Britain’s spin doctors manipulate the media,
London: Bantam.
MILLER, DAVID and DINAN, WILLIAM (2000) ‘‘The Rise of the PR Industry in Britain 19791998’’,
European Journal of Communication 15(1), pp. 535.
OSIEL, MARK J. (1986) ‘‘The Professionalization of Journalism: impetus or impediment to a
‘‘watchdog’’ press?’’, Sociological Inquiry 56(2), pp. 163282.
PR WEEK (2008) ‘‘2008 Top 150 PR Consultancies’’, 24 April.
REEVES, RACHEL and SAWICKI, MICHAEL (2007) ‘‘Do Financial Markets React to Bank of England
Communication?’’, European Journal of Political Economy 23, pp. 20727.
STARKMAN, DEAN (2009) ‘‘A Timely Academic Study Asks the Right Questions’’, The Audit. A Blog of
the Columbia Journalism Review, January, http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/post_153.php.
WILBY, PETER (2007) ‘‘How to Play Footsie With Younger Readers’’, MediaGuardian, 19 March.
Damian Tambini, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London
WC2A 2AE, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
THE NEW BREED OF BUSINESS
JOURNALISM FOR NICHE GLOBAL NEWS
The case of Bloomberg News
than writing news for local markets they produce for a global professional readership. This paper
interrogates the nature of this global news style through linguistic analysis, supported by
interviews with journalists. The paper raises questions about the continued efficacy of
‘‘traditional’’ models of journalism practice and notions of audience.
Introduction
While many observers are now in agreement that traditional forms of news and
journalism are in downturn due to a combination of factors*advertising, market
pressures, deregulation, new technologies and changing audience culture*there are
exceptions as in the case of the global finance and business news agency Bloomberg.
Bloomberg appears to be particularly attuned to these new pressures and is producing
a growing quantity of general news that is specifically targeted at a global business
community. Bloomberg’s subscriber-based model for financing its business service has
secured enough revenue to enable the company to expand its general news operation. It
is now providing tailor-made news for a growing range of mainstream outlets, filling some
of the gaps in content created by the downturn in revenue. This paper’s main focus is on
Bloomberg’s general news-writing approach, not its business and finance service. We
compare Bloomberg general news stories with content from mainstream outlets, including
Thomson-Reuters and the British Guardian, and we identify a marked difference. In the
stories we analysed, we found Bloomberg’s approach to be much clearer, fact-based,
multi-sourced and without ‘‘local’’ subjective inflections. We interviewed Bloomberg staff
and studied a recent copy of their style guide, and found that their new writing approach
is carefully orchestrated to appeal to a global readership. Although we question the
implications of news produced for a business audience. The emergence of news agencies
was intertwined with the market. Therefore we wished to delve deeper into Bloomberg
News to see whether applying its global business news style to general news is as positive
as it seems.
Methodology
In December 2009, Bloomberg’s chairman Peter Grauer told ft.com of the company’s
mission to be the world’s most ‘‘influential source of news’’.1 We have chosen to analyse
Bloomberg specifically because of its relatively rapid rise to prominence and its detailed
attention to news style. We examine Bloomberg’s public website, as opposed to its
subscriber-only service, for reasons of feasibility and to allow us to examine breaking news
in real-time. For our textual analysis, we chose a major breaking news story of global
interest*the death of musical artist Michael Jackson*to compare how different local and
global news providers culturally locate the story to cater for their different target
audiences. We felt this story best illustrated the extent to which mainstream UK, US and
global news ‘‘brands’’ apply a degree of value judgement and interpretation to news
stories whereas Bloomberg runs them very straight and does not assume prior knowledge
or opinion on the part of their readers, who could live anywhere in the globe. As the
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
Jackson story was US-based, we were interested to see whether this US-based company
appeared to be catering for a largely US business community. We also compared coverage
of another global story, the predicted swine flu H1N1 pandemic, and found similar
patterns emerging. Finally, we look briefly at two other texts in order to show the way that
business imperatives can influence the way that stories are prioritised and which elements
are emphasised.
To carry out our textual analysis we draw on Halliday’s (1985) outline of clause
relations, basic lexical analysis (Fairclough, 2000) and appraisal theory (Martin and White,
2005). The first assesses the degree of complexity in writing style, specifically the linkage
and ordering information with ideas. The second draws attention to applied generic
discourses such as information or entertainment. The third indicates levels of journalistic
interpretation in texts.
Examining the products of news providers simultaneously demands an exploration
of the processes and practices that make that news (Machin and Niblock, 2006). Textual
analysis alone is not sufficiently revealing. We contacted Bloomberg editorial staff to
gauge their reflections on our observations. These interviews, coupled with examination of
Bloomberg’s reflexive approach to house style, were revealing in that they exposed the
global branding imperative lying beneath this carefully formulated editorial strategy. All of
our interviewees wished to remain anonymous.
Accordingly, our route through the material is interdisciplinary. First, we analyse the
context, both historic and current, of the emergence and power of news agencies in order
to situate Bloomberg against its rivals such as Thomson-Reuters. Then we explore
Bloomberg itself, the working environment for journalists and its driving editorial
imperatives which are revealed through style book analysis and interviews. Finally, we
undertake our comparative linguistic analysis of Bloomberg’s coverage to illustrate how
‘‘process drives content’’ (Machin and Niblock, 2008).
redundancies and much smaller news teams (Machin and Niblock, 2006). Remaining
editorial staff have far fewer resources for gathering their own material or even for routine
checking. The situation has been compounded by a significant downturn in advertising
revenue as companies turn to alternative, cheaper promotion routes through the Internet.
There has been a corresponding growth in press offices and public relations departments
which now feed reporters and news rooms with pre-packaged material. There has also
been a similar growth in news agencies which operate to repackage and recycle news
which they then sell on (Machin and Niblock, 2006).
News corporations are seeking ways to salvage titles with targeted news. Machin
and Niblock (2008) looked at the way one title, the UK regional morning newspaper
Liverpool Daily Post, had re-launched and re-branded, to seek out specific smaller
advertising niches. In 2009 another UK regional title, the Birmingham Post, shifted away
from addressing a wider public to targeting the business sector. The success of targeted
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
news, at least in the United Kingdom, is evident in a report published by OC&C Strategy
Consultants in November 2009. The list of the country’s largest media groups ranked by
revenue is dominated by companies that charge their customers. Those whose profits
depend primarily on advertising*including broadcasters such as ITV and Channel 4*
have fallen down the league table during the worst recession in the industry for a
generation. At the top of the list is Bloomberg’s UK rival Thomson-Reuters, which until
recently was the leading provider of global finance analysis and news. In the United
Kingdom, The Economist magazine has had a slow but steady increase in circulation
according to the Audit Bureau of Circulation (July to December 2009) in sharp contrast
with mainstream newspapers. In the United States, the situation for print outlets has been
tougher, with a Conde Naste launch, Portfolio, closing soon after it opened. But the online
business-targeted sector appears to be growing in prominence, with Bloomberg leading
the way.
Bloomberg News is the rapidly expanding arm of the established US Bloomberg L.P.
(Limited Partnership) financial data company. It comprises a global text-based news
service, a television station, radio and podcast service, an Internet site and printed
publications including a magazine and books. Founded in 1981 by the current Mayor of
New York City Michael Bloomberg, the company provides financial data, analysis and news
to financial and business organisations globally through the Bloomberg Terminal.
Bloomberg Professional subscribers pay a set monthly fee to receive Bloomberg’s services
via a dual-screen desktop terminal ‘‘Native Client’’, referred to as ‘‘The Bloomberg’’ by staff.
The machine comprises a bespoke colour-coded Bloomberg keyboard that enables instant
access to global business data. Subscribers are also provided with a username and
password that enables them to log-in to the service remotely wherever they are in the
globe over smart phone handsets.
The Bloomberg news operation was launched in 1991 to compete fully with the
Dow Jones News Service and Reuters, as it was before it merged with Canadian media
giant Thomson. Bloomberg states:
Even in its embryonic state, the Bloomberg system was already a news machine.
Although it provided only numbers, graphs and charts, it delivered the most valuable
news a money manager could use: process, relative values, and trends. And that news
wasn’t coming second-hand from any wire service, newspaper, magazine, or electronic
broadcast. It was presented as it happened. By contrast, by the time anyone read
a newspaper report on the price and yield discrepancies that create investment
786 DAVID MACHIN AND SARAH NIBLOCK
possibilities, it was too late. The buying or selling opportunity had probably vanished.
(1997, p. 75)
Bloomberg reports more than 100,000 users in North America, and more than
150,000 in the rest of the world. In July 2008, Merrill Lynch agreed to sell its 20 per cent
stake in the firm back to Bloomberg, for a reported $4.43 billion, valuing the firm at
approximately $22.5 billion.2 With 2300 people, Bloomberg News employs one of the
largest editorial staffs in the world. The journalists work out of 135 bureaus, 30 of which
are located in the Asia-Pacific region alone to reflect the growing economy in that area.
At the time of writing, 10 papers around the world, including the Spanish-language
edition of the Miami Herald and Tages-Anzeiger, the second-largest daily in Switzerland,
run branded Bloomberg News pages. Interviews we conducted with senior staff from the
BBC World Service and BBC News pointed to their own retreat from attempting to cover
international events due to the need to control costs and the ability of competitors such as
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
Bloomberg to provide this much cheaper. In this way, the Bloomberg news service is
growing in status off the back of a failing mainstream newspaper and news industry. While
‘‘traditional’’ corporations, such as News Corp, have been exploring methods of charging
for online content, Bloomberg already has a profitable business model that does not rely
on charging for content or competing for advertising revenue which has provided the
biggest challenge for existing news outlets.
Wall Street Journal reporter Matthew Winkler was handpicked by Michael Bloomberg
to devise the service and its driving ethos, The Bloomberg Way. Here the particular style of
news delivery, one which emphasises fast delivery of core information, was to be part of a
marketing strategy to attract further uses to the core financial services. Bloomberg wrote:
Our purpose was to do more than just collect and relay news; it should also, ethically,
advertise the analytical and computational powers of the Bloomberg terminal by
highlighting its capabilities in each news story . . . More retrievals meant more rentals,
which meant more revenue, which in turn meant we could afford more reporters and
have more news, and so on. Accordingly, every initiative*the magazine, television,
radio*is valued not for the revenue it brings in but for its contribution to making the
core Bloomberg product, the terminal, more indispensable. (1997, p. 83)
opening and closing prices of the stock exchanges as swiftly as possible, to enable them
to keep ahead of their competitors. The news agencies of today have not changed
considerably in this respect (Boyd-Barrett and Rantanen, 1998, p. 62). In the late 1990s
more than 90 per cent of Reuters’ revenue came from financial services.
In 2000 Reuters was operating at twice the revenues of Bloomberg whereas by 2006
they were roughly the same (Loomis, 2007). While Reuters merged with Thomson in 2008,
Bloomberg continued with its own strategic acquisitions, buying up Business Week in 2009
with the precise plan of expanding its terminal users and website subscribers. One of our
interviewees pointed to this as clear evidence of the Bloomberg vision that the future of
news provision would be on the Web and for the niche rather than general market.
environment, science, sports, arts and culture. There is inbuilt competition amongst each
team as journalists strive to achieve the lead story in each section. Each new recruit
undergoes a period of training in the in-house protocol The Bloomberg Way. This style
guide was written by the founding editor-in-chief Winkler to govern every minute detail of
the crafting of copy, and is not publicly available.
Amongst our interviewees were two Bloomberg financial reporters, who could not
be named to protect their identities. A direct request to interview the head of training had
earlier been declined. The reporters, who underwent full training in the Bloomberg Way,
identified the abiding principles that are constantly reinforced in the workplace. We look
at these closely as they help us to understand the nature of the news texts that we analyse
in the next section:
. Accuracy.
. The importance of real time.
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
. Control of editors.
. Preparation.
. Internal competition.
. Audience monitoring.
. Precise use of language.
Our interviewees said that factual accuracy was drilled into trainees as being of
paramount importance. All stories needed to be referenced by two named sources which
were to be placed in the first two paragraphs. This meant that often stories would not be
run by Bloomberg that other outlets might carry. The interviewees said that they found
this frustrating as they would often have trouble finding a second source prepared to go
on record. Veracity was, they were drilled, crucial to the brand image. But on the other
hand, they admitted that this added to a sense of veracity and reliability of the stories that
Bloomberg carried.
Bloomberg, in keeping with most newsrooms, maintains a calendar of future,
predicted events, such as company annual reports. The interviewees said that it was
practice to draft two stories to have on hold for the announcement of event outcomes;
one to be used if it was positive the other if it was bad, each including interviews from
experts that explained each eventuality and why it had happened. This was important in
order for the up-to-date nature of Web news. One interviewee who had since moved on
from Bloomberg to a rival agency said that Bloomberg appeared to be ahead in
the realisation that news production had to be geared to needs of the Web for up-to-date
material. Much of their daily work involved the continual update of their stories. One
interviewee who had worked for a number of other agencies beforehand commented that
it was only possible thanks to the heavy resourcing and staffing of the Bloomberg news
operation.
Internal competition is maintained at Bloomberg through reporters striving to have
their work in the main top 10 headlines on the portal at any one time. But one interviewee
explained: ‘‘Stories that get into the top 10 get much more attention from editors and you
will see these change a lot on the terminal, having frequent updates’’. Bloomberg uses
users’ accounts to the terminal to observe which stories people are reading, and will
develop or repeat these stories. Several interviewees pointed quickly to the way that
Bloomberg had also realised that the Internet provided the opportunity to observe what
clients want, and adapt to this in real-time. One interviewee, who had worked for other
NEW BREED OF BUSINESS JOURNALISM 789
agencies, did mention that this attention to client needs, for him, raised the issue of news
being written and developed not in the first place for citizens, but rather for niche groups.
This is a trend we have observed elsewhere through research into branding newspapers
and radio news (Machin and Niblock, 2006, 2008). One interviewee marked this as a key
difference between writing for Bloomberg and for other agencies he had later worked for.
He said that the Reuter’s style was very different for the financial and general news, where
the latter was aimed at a broad range of clients, such as radio, tabloids and broadsheets.
Bloomberg, he viewed, had been the first to adapt to the trend away from clients being
willing, or having the finances, to simply opt into feeds as characterised the former
‘‘wholesale’’ pattern of agency operation.
The international nature of Bloomberg is key to explaining the massive control of
editors over all details of stories. One reporter told us that his completed story would be
first filed to his own bureau editor who would text-edit where appropriate and return it to
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
him to check the changes. The story would then be filed to the editor of the region’s main
bureau who may make further changes. If the story was likely to make a lead, then there
might be a phone conference with editors across the region. The control of editors over
reporters’ copy became even more acute when preparing drafts for features. One reporter
said: ‘‘Everyone dreaded this’’. He would draft a number of paragraphs of a story. Then it
would go out to regional editors in two bureaus before being sent for inspection to the
head office in New York. At each point it would be sub-edited and requests for additional
reporting were made to the journalist. The absolute precision required meant that the
reporter had to even go back to interviewees to ask them to rephrase terms like ‘‘drab’’
which were too vague for a global audience: ‘‘And at each stage it goes back through all
the editors who rewrite’’.
Bloomberg texts have trademark specificity of information. They also tend to avoid
clichés and stereotypes as these too are culturally specific. One interviewee told us: ‘‘If I
was a foreign correspondent in for a British newspaper working in, say, Sydney, I would
always look for stories that fitted the stereotypes held by the British, such as the idea that
people in Australia drink a lot or get eaten by crocodiles. But in the Bloomberg universe
these clichés cannot be relied upon as a person in Malaysia, or a Malaysian person working
in a bank in London may not share the same reference points’’.
Economics, markets, companies and industries are subjects little understood, much less
appreciated. The public*our readers, viewers and listeners worldwide*suffers the
consequence of journalism’s traditional ignorance of these subjects and journalism’s
arrogance in reveling in its ignorance. The reporter who hasn’t covered economies,
markets, companies and industries is deficient in knowing the ways of the world.
790 DAVID MACHIN AND SARAH NIBLOCK
The use of the word ‘‘but’’ was allegedly banned by Winkler, along with ‘‘however’’
and ‘‘despite’’ as it forces readers to deal with conflicting ideas in the same sentence.
Winkler elaborates in The Bloomberg Way:
Determine the key piece(s) of information. Failing to include the most important facts in
the theme, or including too many facts, makes it difficult to attract readers’ attention.
Include the ‘‘why’’ along with the ‘‘what.’’ Without providing the explanation as part of
the theme, the quotation and details don’t help the story.
from other mainstream news services, specifically Reuters and the British Guardian,
according to our analysis. The comparison with the other major news brands identifies
Bloomberg’s specificities as well as highlights the local inflections in other brands’
respected for their neutrality. For this we draw on three approaches from linguistics:
Halliday’s (1985) categories of clause relations are used in order to measure degrees of
grammatical complexity in the stories; Fairclough’s (2000) Critical Discourse Analysis is
used for basic lexical analysis; Appraisal Theory (Martin and White 2005) allows us to
show levels of journalistic interpretation in texts. The Jackson story allows us to best
illustrate the extent to which many news ‘‘brands’’ apply a degree of value judgement
and interpretation to news items. Conversely, Bloomberg’s treatment does not assume
prior knowledge or opinion on the part of their readers, who could live anywhere in the
globe. It assumes readers may not have heard of Jackson. In addition to copy text, we
analyse headlines, clause structures and lexical content in comparison with other news
providers.
Bloomberg Version
Michael Jackson Pronounced Dead at Hospital, L A Times reports
Singer Michael Jackson was pronounced dead at a Los Angeles hospital today, the Los
Angeles Times reported, citing city and law enforcement sources.
The singer wasn’t breathing when paramedics arrived at his home in the wealthy
neighborhood of Bel Air at about 12:26 p.m., the newspaper reported on its Web site,
citing Captain Steve Ruda. Jackson was taken to UCLA Medical Center.
Jackson, 50, became a musical icon as front man for the Jackson 5 family music act
in the 1960s and later was a top-selling solo performer with hits such as ‘‘Thriller’’ and
‘‘Billie Jean.’’ He is as well-known for his highly publicized trial and acquittal in 2005 on
child molestation charges.
The singer was attempting a comeback and had been rehearsing for sold-out
shows at London’s 20,000-seat O2 arena scheduled, starting in July. In May, the
organizers delayed some of the 50 performances to give the singer more time to
prepare.
NEW BREED OF BUSINESS JOURNALISM 791
Headlines
Bloomberg headlines are highly descriptive and always appear as information rather
than the promise of a narrative or a teaser. On the same day the Guardian used ‘‘Michael
Jackson Dies’’. Reuters used ‘‘King of Pop Michael Jackson is dead’’ and the Washington Post
‘‘Michael Jackson, ‘King of Pop,’ dead at 50’’ which it took from the Associated Press feed.
Many of these treatments use pop culture honorifics (‘‘King of Pop’’, for example) in
headlines serving to place the stories into the ‘‘entertainments’’ genre. Bloomberg simply
states factually ‘‘Michael Jackson Pronounced Dead at Hospital’’. Only the Guardian is
equally as directly informative although its ‘‘Michael Jackson Dies’’ does suggest something
more of a teaser with its simple single noun/verb clause lacking in further detail.
Opening Sentences
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
The Bloomberg report begins with a clear opening theme explaining what is at
stake, backed up with support. As stated by Winkler, the first paragraph should state the
most important detail up front without delay. Bloomberg places great store on opening
sentences as providers of core information rather than setting up narratives. The simplicity
of Bloomberg’s opening sentence can be seen through comparison with the Guardian
opening paragraph:
American pop music legend Michael Jackson died of a heart attack in a Los Angeles
hospital today, just weeks before he hoped to resurrect his four-decade long career with
a series of sold-out shows in London.
This sentence is much more complex. Drawing on linguist Michael Halliday (1985,
pp. 2002219) who was interested in clause relations in language we can explain the
difference between these two sentences and how these influence the relative ease of
readability and pace of information. Halliday was interested in the way that clauses follow
on from each other in order to build on information provided in those before them in
different ways. He offered three ways in which subsequent clauses can do this:
elaboration, extension and enhancement. He later developed on these, but they are
sufficient for our purposes here:
. Elaboration restates, providing equivalent information. We learn no additional informa-
tion. Such clauses often start with ‘‘for example’’, ‘‘for instance’’, ‘‘in particular’’, ‘‘at this
moment’’.
. Extension adds or varies the meaning of the first clause by providing extra information.
Here the meaning of the first clause can be modified. So a first clause might tell us a
person has died and the second that he was bizarre, or innocent. This therefore varies
how we read the first clause. The meaning of the death is modified. Such clauses often
start with ‘‘and’’, ‘‘but’’, ‘‘alternatively’’.
. Enhancement is where circumstantial information that is relevant to the first clause is
given in the following clause. So this is to do with time, place, condition etc. Such clauses
often start with ‘‘then’’, ‘‘before that’’, ‘‘soon’’, ‘‘in other respects’’.
The first sentence of the Bloomberg text contains the first clause: ‘‘Singer Michael
Jackson was pronounced dead’’ which is then followed by the subordinate clause ‘‘at a Los
792 DAVID MACHIN AND SARAH NIBLOCK
Angeles hospital today’’ that provides enhancement telling us where this took place. It is a
pretty simple clause structure. The first sentence of the Guardian text above is different.
We have a longer ‘‘head’’, which is the noun group, ‘‘American pop music legend Michael
Jackson’’ compared to Bloomberg’s shorter and less evaluative, ‘‘Singer Michael Jackson’’.
This longer head is placed into the opening clause ‘‘American pop music legend Michael
Jackson died of a heart attack’’ telling us he has died, then an enhancement clause ‘‘in a Los
Angeles hospital today’’ telling us where this happened and when, followed by another two
extension clauses ‘‘just weeks before he hoped to resurrect his four-decade long career’’, and
‘‘with a series of sold out shows’’ and further enhancement, ‘‘in London’’. This is a much
more complex clause structure than in the Bloomberg case, bringing in more information
through both extension and enhancement that Bloomberg would save for later
paragraphs, specifically paragraph four.
The opening sentence of the Reuters text shows even more complexity in its clause
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
relations:
Pop giant Michael Jackson, who took to the stage as a child star and set the world
dancing to exuberant rhythms for decades, died on Thursday after being taken ill at his
home, the Los Angeles Times said.
There are three embedded clauses ‘‘who took to the stage as a child star ’’, ‘‘and set
the world dancing to exuberant rhythms ’’ and ‘‘for decades’’ within the dominant clause
‘‘Pop giant Michael Jackson . . . died on Thursday’’. The embedded clauses are linked by
extension where the second of these ‘‘and set the world dancing to exuberant rhythms’’
brings additional information after the conjunction ‘‘and’’. Following the completion
of the dominant clause we have another enhancement ‘‘after being taken ill at his home’’.
This is a far more complex clause structure and presents much more enhancement and
additional information. Halliday’s categories help find evidence for Bloomberg’s own
assertion that opening sentences should be simple, providing a direct opening theme.
Moving on to the second paragraph, Bloomberg’s style book guides that here we
should find quotation from an authority on the subject who gives credence or validates
the first paragraph. In the Jackson case we find precisely this:
The singer wasn’t breathing when paramedics arrived at his home in the wealthy
neighborhood of Bel Air at about 12:26 p.m., the newspaper reported on its Web site,
citing Captain Steve Ruda. Jackson was taken to UCLA Medical Center.
Reuters also carries a quote but includes the basic information that Bloomberg
placed in the first paragraph:
‘‘Pop star Michael Jackson was pronounced dead by doctors this afternoon after arriving
at a hospital in a deep coma, city and law enforcement sources told The Times,’’ the
newspaper reported on its website.
The Guardian does something similar, producing a more elaborated version of what
Bloomberg placed in its first paragraph:
Jackson was taken to the University of California at Los Angeles medical centre, and
paramedics administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ambulance. He arrived at
the hospital in a coma and was reported dead about three hours later.
NEW BREED OF BUSINESS JOURNALISM 793
Bloomberg avoids placing any broader contextual information at the start of the
story. It is only specifically what has happened as the news event that appears in the first
paragraph and a substantiation of this in the second.
The importance of the third paragraph in the Bloomberg style book is to spell out
the significance of the information that has been imparted in paragraphs one and two,
while paragraph four provides further illuminating factual detail. Looking to the third and
fourth paragraphs of the Jackson text above, what we find is that paragraph three
provides a short summary of who Jackson was in simple sentences without embedded
clauses. There is also an assumption that the reader may not have extensive previous
knowledge of Jackson. This same information was placed much higher up in the Guardian
and Reuters texts. Only paragraph four of the Bloomberg text places the events of his
death in the narrative of the come-back tour.
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
Entertainment Lexis
There are other important stylistic differences between the three texts. We find
difference also in basic lexical choices in the writing. The Bloomberg text refers to Jackson
as ‘‘Singer Michael Jackson’’ and ‘‘Jackson’’. In contrast Reuters use pop honorifics/cliches
in the form of ‘‘Pop star Michael Jackson’’, ‘‘Pop Giant’’, ‘‘King of Pop’’. The Guardian uses
‘‘American pop music legend’’ and ‘‘King of Pop’’. Bloomberg avoids these ‘‘entertainment
and lifestyle’’ style terms.
Language of Evaluation
In the Bloomberg text we find an absence of what linguistics have called the
‘‘language of evaluation’’ (Iedema et al., 1994; Martin and White, 2005). These writers
sought to provide a framework for the analysis of the evaluative aspect of news reporting.
This draws on a paradigm known as ‘‘appraisal theory’’ and aims to account for the
variation in the mechanisms by which attitudinal positions can be conveyed and by which
the reader can be positioned to favour or disfavour a particular viewpoint. These features
are often less evident to the reader as they do not appear as obvious opinion. Such
techniques are common in creating drama and human interest.
In tabloid-style reporting, emotional reactions to events are used to evaluate a
person positively or negatively. The Guardian notes Jackson’s death came ‘‘just weeks
before he hoped to resurrect his four-decade long career’’. The evaluations here are ‘‘hoped’’
and ‘‘just’’. Additionally, giving readers access to a person’s mental world also has an effect
of humanising a story. The fact of ‘‘hoping’’ adds human feelings and tragedy. The term
‘‘just’’ is therefore also an important evaluation, implying the sad timing. This also allows
the journalist to link in other events to create a narrative of failure and hopes of renewal of
which this story is just one part.
We also find language of evaluation in the following sentence from the Guardian:
‘‘Although in the last two decades his reputation was sullied by accusations of child
molestation and his bizarre public behaviour’’. The words ‘‘sullied’’, and ‘‘bizarre’’ are what
appraisal theorists term ‘‘appreciation’’ and are the more obvious ways that journalists
provide assessments of states of affairs and processes in terms of their social significance.
Such evaluative terms are absent from the Bloomberg text. It does mention the child
794 DAVID MACHIN AND SARAH NIBLOCK
molestation but refers to it in the sentence ‘‘well-known for his highly publicized trial
and acquittal in 2005 on child molestation charges’’. The text makes no attempts at
dramatization and clearly mentions the acquittal from the charges. Likewise in the Reuters
text we find the use of hyperbole and rhetorical tropes as in the sentence he ‘‘set the world
dancing’’. Again such techniques are avoided by Bloomberg.
As we were told by our interviewees, all of these evaluations cannot be used in
Bloomberg texts. In the first place they cannot be specified or justified. A phrase like ‘‘set the
world dancing’’ would have to be described in terms of concrete record sales. In the second
place such evaluations can carry cultural inflections and values that may not be recognised
across all the Bloomberg users. During training, reporters were continually told to check if
their stories contained any word that might be culturally specific and if so to remove it.
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
Bloomberg Version
Swine Flu Dominates in U.S. Where 98% Test Positive (Update1)
Swine flu is responsible for about 98 percent of the influenza cases tested in the U.S.,
overshadowing other strains in a population with little natural resistance to the new
virus, a U.S. study found.
The new flu, H1N1, is widespread across 11 states and circulating in parts of 19
others, according to a report by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists
presented today in Atlanta. The number of seasonal flu cases has declined as swine flu
spread after it was first identified in April.
Scientists have used laboratory tests to confirm 27,715 cases of swine flu in the
U.S., and as many as 1 million people may have been sick and not had testing, the CDC
said. Widespread flu is unusual in the U.S. at this time of the year.
‘‘We’re all tightening our belts*there isn’t anybody that does not anticipate that
we’re going to be dealing with this virus in a serious way this fall and winter,’’ said
William Schaffner, an influenza expert at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in
Nashville, Tennessee, in an interview at the conference.
The Bloomberg formula is again carefully followed. The headline is direct and
provides full information. The opening sentence is a simple clause structure and highly
descriptive as will become clear when we look at the other news treatments. The second
paragraph provides the sourcing of the information and the third and fourth paragraphs
expand on these.
Looking at the headlines and opening sentences from Reuters and the Associated
Press feeds we find something very different.
NEW BREED OF BUSINESS JOURNALISM 795
Reuters
New H1N1 flu not going away: U.S. health agency
More than 1 million people in the United States may have been infected with the new
H1N1 swine flu, U.S. health officials said on Friday, and infections continue to rise.
Associated Press
US swine flu cases may have hit 1 million
Health officials estimate that as many as 1 million Americans now have the new swine flu.
Lyn Finelli, a flu surveillance official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
Both of these feeds use sensationalist headlines or opening lines which suggest the
disease is now reaching epidemic proportions. The Associated Press uses a metaphorical
trope in the form of ‘‘hit’’ which suggests something that possesses momentum and which
has collided. Reuters adds a menacing subordinate clause ‘‘and infections continue to
rise’’, for which they give no evidence but which invites less attention as it is placed in this
way in the sentence. Linguists have observed that this is a typical rhetorical strategy for
downplaying some facts while foregrounding those that are placed at the start of the
dominant clause (van Dijk, 1985). The Associated Press qualifies the nature of the facts
with ‘‘voiced the estimate at a vaccine advisory meeting Thursday in Atlanta’’, again using
the subordinate clause to ‘‘bury’’ this information at the end of the long sentence. Reuters
also use the modal verb ‘‘may have been’’ to indicate that the level of infection is not a
hard fact. So both Reuters and the Associated Press eventually come around to telling us
what the Bloomberg text places right at the top; that this is an estimate and that it appears
that swine flu is replacing other strains of flu. Bloomberg does not overplay the drama.
Interviewees said that both these other feeds would simply be rejected by the Bloomberg
editorial process.
Mail Job Cuts’’. The first paragraph states: ‘‘London postal workers began a three-day strike in
a dispute over workforce reductions at state- owned Royal Mail Group Plc.’’ which, true to
Bloomberg style, relays the key factual angle of the story, although one of our interviewees
pointed out that this was clearly a first draft as the word ‘‘postal worker’’ would have been
changed to ‘‘mail workers’’ as indeed it quickly was as postal was too locally specific. The
story gets a very low billing on the BBC website, appearing as a minor story on the UK-
wide section of their website. Reading further into the story, it could be deduced that the
news selection criteria applied when giving this story top billing are to do with its status as
a business story. In paragraph six, Bloomberg continues:
The U.K. government last week postponed a plan, opposed by unions, to sell a stake in
Royal Mail to an investor to help improve competitiveness. The company has suffered
a 10 percent decline in annual postal volumes, while in London 20 percent fewer items
are being delivered daily than two years ago.
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
A London auction ended with the sale of 20.3 million pounds ($32.7 million) of art last
night as the market for traditional paintings continued to shrink.
The selection of this as the leading arts story also coheres with the business
imperative of Bloomberg’s global branding of news. The lead story is as much news
because of the scale of the money involved. This angle is emphasised over and above the
nature of the art itself. The unifying global angle is, therefore, the financial aspect of the
story rather than the cultural. By the end of the day in London, as the New York business
day was well under way, the story order had shifted to lead on an interview with a Harvard
scientist-turned-author. Most of the stories that were around that morning were still on
the list at the end of the day, but displayed with a different running order that caters more
to a US market. The interest in the Michael Jackson story quickly moved on to issues of the
value of his estate and the matter of his inheritance and the related legal issues.
Our interviewees confirmed our observations that stories had in the first place to be
Downloaded by [University of Pretoria] at 19:44 15 November 2012
thought about in terms of the business audience. One said ‘‘we are only interested in
the occupation of Palestine, for example, if it might be of interest to the financial markets’’.
He acknowledged that this raised serious issues about the growing power of Bloomberg
as a global provider of news. And particularly this global ‘‘community’’ of users of the
terminal, holding much power over the flow of wealth around the planet, are experiencing
the world of events only in terms of the interests of making money.
Conclusion
Bloomberg’s model of news production has allowed it to continue to grow while
many other news outlets look to slim down and are losing money. Bloomberg has been able
to embrace shifts in technology and changing cultures in both news consumption and news
agency/client relations, giving it a market advantage over its competitors. If the Bloomberg
model is the future of news then this calls us to reconsider the existing work on news values.
In earlier papers we have considered the shift away from news for citizens to news for
consumers (Machin and Niblock, 2007) and for niche markets. In each case it was clear that
earlier models of news values had to be reconsidered. With the shift from print-based
journalism to the Web there will be the broader need to address less localized and more
niche markets who are task driven rather than entertainment driven and who may indeed
not have entered through the ‘‘front door’’ but through search engines. This will have
implications for news style and content. Along with the business imperative these are new
challenges to our models of journalism that certainly require our increased attention.
NOTES
1. See http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b18d45e0-e296-11de-b028-00144feab49a.html.
2. See http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jul/18/merrilllynch.jpmorgan.
REFERENCES
and VAN LEEUWEN, THEO (1994) The Media Interview, Kensington: New South Wales
BELL, PHILIP
Press.
BLOOMBERG, M. R. (1997) Bloomberg by Bloomberg, London: Wiley.
798 DAVID MACHIN AND SARAH NIBLOCK
historical analysis of the language of the radio’’, International Journal of the Sociology of
Language 26, pp. 75100.
LOOMIS, CAROL J. (2007) ‘‘Bloomberg’s Money Machine’’, Fortune, 5 April, http://money.cnn.com/
magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/04/16/8404302/index2.htm.
MACHIN, DAVID and NIBLOCK, SARAH (2006) News Production: theory and practice, London:
Routledge.
MACHIN, DAVID and NIBLOCK, SARAH (2007) ‘‘News Values for Consumer Groups: the case of
Independent Radio News, London, UK’’, Journalism 8(2), pp. 184204.
MACHIN, DAVID and NIBLOCK, SARAH (2008) ‘‘Branding Newspapers: visual texts as social practice’’,
Journalism Studies 9(2), pp. 24459.
MACHIN, DAVID and VAN LEEUWEN, THEO (2007) Global Media Discourse, London: Routledge.
MARTIN, JAMES and WHITE, PETER (2005) The Language of Evaluation: appraisal in English, London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
VAN DIJK, TEUN A. (1985) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 4 vols, New York: Academic Press.
BY GENEVA OVERHOLSER
I
f our focus on social National Association of Hispanic
Geneva Overholser # kdmcmeet Bill Gannon speaking of "the super-lisa's" -
Lisa Stone and Lisa Williams. Cooll
media is primarily about Journalists convention, a young
July 27 dt 2:32pm • vU Twitter • Comment - Ulce how to use them as woman cried out: "Michael Jack-
l a C4tter-Ann M«hd4vi likes this. "tools" for journalism, we son died!" Using my iPhone, I
I Write a comment.,. | risk getting it backward. Googled "Michael Jackson died."
Social media are not so Several reports showed up—all
Geneva Overholser Text works better than audio and video because we deal
in soundbites and want it quickly searchable: paidcontent's Rafat Ali #kdmcmeet much mere tools as they from years long-gone. His was
July 27 ât l:4&pm • via Twitter - Comment - like
are the ocean we're going a much-rumored death. So I
/"A^
^ ^
Mary Wennersrrum Ask them how a non-proñt like us
can really use social media as «ffectivety as they? Tell
to be swimming in—at checked Twitter, and found the
^ '^ them the economy is killing us!
July 27 at 2:32pm
least until the next chapter TMZ report—couched in some
I Write a comment...
of the digital revolution skepticism from my tweeps. On
comes along. What needs to the Los Angeles Times, where
Geneva Overholser RaFat Ali at kdmc bd mtg: to write for us, journalists have
to speed It up. And bring in international news! #kdmcmeet
our attention is how we're Jackson was still in a coma. Now
Jyly 27 «t li-Öpm • v i * Twitter • Comment • Like going to play roles that the flight was leaving. Not until I
Geneva Overholser Paidcontent's Rafat All at KDMC board meeting: I just got bring journalistic values landed did I get the confirmation
on Twitter #omnimeeting
July 27 n l:3Sprn • via Twitter • Comment ' Like
into this vast social media I itched for: the Times, quoting
territory. the coroner.
Geneva Overholser Lisa stone at knight dig media center bd mtg sez blogher
folks are overwhelmingly interested in hard news # omnimeeting It is essential to begin But what if TMZ had quoted
July 27 A l;33pm • via Twitter • Comment • like
by understanding various the coroner? Would I have
Myla Reson loundi accurate
July 27 at 1:37pm
social media sites and the stopped there?
ways they can enhance This raises questions about
I Write a comment...
the work journalists do. what verification means in this
Geneva Overholser #omnimeeting with great group of knight digital media A regular perusal of sites age of social media. And what is
center board members. Hearing what Berkeley and we at use annenberg are
doing like lOOOOwords.net and journalism's role in making sure
July 27 at 1:06pm • via Twitter • Comment * like savethemedia.com is a information is verified? It strikes
Ú Thomas GoflF likes this.
great way to do this. But me that most people don't care
tAfrite a comment...
how do we move beyond as much about who publishes
acquainting ourselves with news (or what are often rumors)
^ Geneva and Riyadh iNytimes are now hiends. ccrrrxn:
this world and actually fig- first these days as they do about
¿¡^ Geneva and Ruth Kevess-Cohen are now Brends. ure out how to "use" it for whether the sites they rely on
2 more simdar stories journalism, which requires have it right when they want it.
^ Geneva commented on her own status.
understanding its nature Now, as we all know, news and
Joe Saltzman Thanks for kind words today. It's been a trying few weeks and and impact on participants information need to be on the
it's nice to know it's appreciated. See you in Boston if not before. (Our panel is
and on public life? platform we're checking, wher-
What does it mean to ever we are.
journalists, for example, Being there and being accurate
Geneva Overholser's Facebook page. that people are in large are how journalistic credibility is
measure obtaining, and brought to the social media ocean.
shaping, their informa- Yet many legacy media have fallen
tion so differently than behind in delivering this one-two
they have in the past? punch combination. While it's a
In June, as I got on the given that there will always be
plane to fly back from the a need for reliable verification.
what must be better understood is hov^^ ourselves. Our job is to keep an eye practice—the new sensibilities required
people seek out news and information on the public interest. Bringing our of them now that they will swim there
and how they learn through their use journalistic values to these environ- as journalists.
of social media. ments that have captured the imagi- Integrating the questions and issues
Recently, the MacArthur Foun- nation of millions is one of the most and tools into everyday classroom dis-
dation's John Bracken and I talked promising ways we have of serving cussion is critical. When the focus is
about the process by which an online that interest. on journalistic ethics, the geopolitical
community or group digests an event Too often, it seems, those of us implications of social networks' role
and comes to an understanding of it who've been about building commu- belong in that discussion. In lessons
in real time. This happens among Fa- nity through our journalism seem to revolving around entrepreneurial
cebook friends or people whose tweets assume a kind of "how dare they?" journalism, there needs to be woven
we follow or folks who create new attitude toward those who construct into the conversation the issue of
records of events on Wikipedia. The communities through social media. how journalists handle their personal
question well worth asking is where We've got to get over that. People are engagement in social networks. Along
journalism fits in this fast-emerging vastly more powerful now as consumers with this would come discussion of
and ever-changing social media and and shapers of news. The less loudly how they "brand" themselves for a
digital ecosystem. journalists applaud this development, future that is likely to include a lot
During a June conference, "Beyond the further behind we'll be left until of independent activity.
Broadcast 09,"' held at the University we fade to irrelevance. At Annenberg, we've now hired
of Southern California's Annenberg Accuracy, proportionality and fair- digital innovators and observers—
School of Journalism, conversations ness, as time-honored journalistic val- Andrew Lih, author of "The Wikipedia
ranged from the information needs ues, are well worth adoption by those Revolution," Robert Hernandez, who
of communities to democratizing conversing through social networks. executed the vision for The Seattle
the language of online storytelling, Useful, too, would be journalism's Times' Web site, and Henry Jenkins,
from maintaining editorial quality (albeit imperfect) emphasis on includ- who directed MIT's Comparative Media
to enabling dialogue and the future ing a broad range of voices. Cool as a Studies program. Using their ability
of public service media. Each topic lot of these social networks are, they to weave experiences and knowledge
discussed was central to the future of can be extremely cliquish. Witness the into our curricula, we know that social
journalism. Yet, never in the three days prevailing Twitter discussions about media will become integral to what
we were together did I once hear the whither journalism, often filled with is taught in our journalism classes.
word "journalism" mentioned. From more strut than substance, lacking both Timely discussions of emerging ex-
there I went to a conference at MIT, historical and international context and amples of social media's influence
where the organizing theme was "civic begging the question: If the Web is on journalism and vice versa must
media." In many of these situations, all about democratization, how come continue, as well.
I find myself using the term "infor- everybody in the debate sounds like The journalism academy has another
mation in the public interest." In all a 19-year-old privileged male? important role to play. It's the natural
these cases, however much journalistic home for substantial analysis and re-
values and practices might be evident, In the Classroom search exploring the impact of social
the term itself is absent. media on learning, on the processing of
Finally, how do we bring social media information, and on the civic dialogue.
Journalism: The Missing into the academy? So far, we at An- As journalists come to understand the
Ingredient nenberg have done it patchily by bring- nature and value of information being
ing in folks to do series of workshops gathered and conveyed through vari-
I'm not suggesting that journalism—as for students and faculty. We've had ous social networks, they will not only
a word, a concept, and a craft—has regular discussions with digital media act more effectively in this new and
gone away or is no longer important. innovators throughout the year. One vital world. They will also enhance the
I'm saying that those of us who ground challenge, of course, is that people's prospects for journalism's long-term
ourselves in what we know to be an level of understanding and comfort is survival. •
ethically sound and civically essential all over the place. Moreover, when the
mode of information gathering and students learning about social media Geneva Overholser, a 1986 Nieman
information dissemination have to find are 18-year-olds, most are already Fellow, is the director of the University
a way to be in these conversations- swimming comfortably in these wa- ofSouthern California's Annenberg
whatever we call the conversations or ters. Yet, they do need to ponder—and School of Journalism.
W
hen the history of online
To Join tha unvBnaUon, log In with Facebook Connactl
journalism is written, it uill
be hard to ignore the biggest newsmixer
mistake made by news organizations
and media companies: thinking of
the World Wide Web as primarily a
one-way broadcasting or publishing L. Letters to the Editor
medium. Add your voice to tbe marketplace of ideas. Offer a thoughtful point of view is 250 words or less.
Back in 1996, when I was the first
online director for The Miami Herald
Publishing Company, I was as guilty of
this misperception as anyone. Our team Editor Highiights
created discussion boards but hoped
Let the acquisition happen VeraSun should resist th^ temptation of
they'd require no attention from our in reply to: VeraSun should resist the temptation of
staft". We didn't think that cultivating byKyanMul
by Brim Boysr The authors make the foDowing statement in their
community or moderating discussions I Most Ingram Managers hold a rainy day fund. artide. "But the processes, methods and tools for
were appropriate or necessary roles for ' and il would be great to hedge against aS bets, but developing flexible strategic plans and adapting to changes
the best of option theory will not forecast or protect against have not been operationalintd adequately to be applied to
a journalist. And we ignored evidence uncerUintie« such et iabor unrest, subcontractor maBagement of dynamic project uncertainty. Project
right in front of us—our own behavior bankrupt^, acts of God... planning,...
as online users—that the most powerful 7 iDomhi, 3 wnla 1(0
News Mixer
I
'
XI.
I can't pretend to know how all this
will evolve, which social interaction
Email: tools will become the most popular,
and whether social networks will ever
Password: really become "like air" online. But
some of the implications are becom-
ing clear: i
By proceeding, you are allowing News Mixer to access your information and you are
agreeing to the Facebook Terms of Use in your use of News Mixer. By using News
Mixer, you also agree to the News Mixer Terms of Service. • Web sites that have built their audi-
ences by enabling user participation
have new opportunities to do so by
Sign up for Facebook Connect Cancel leveraging social networks people
have established elsewhere.
• Social network IDs—typically based
onreal names—might enable higher-
Using Facebook Connect, anyone with a Facebook account can log onto newsmbccr.us and
quality interaction than we've seen
post questions, answers, quips and letters to the editor.
on news sites where the identity of
those who comment is often shielded
by anonymity.
social." At the time, it wasn't easy to The revolutionary idea behind • Content sites may find themselves
find the evidence that Li's prediction Facebook Connect is this: Facebook challenged in growing audience
would come true any time soon. Bnt is encouraging other sites to cre- engagement becanse their users are
now, changes at Facebook and Twitter ate more engaging nser experiences interacting mostly through their so-
are bringing the future more clearly by leveraging the Facebook "social cial networks instead of on separate
into focns. graph"—without needing to visit Face- Web sites.
Facebook officially launched Fa- book.com. This approach is completely • An increasing amount of content
cebook Connect in December, after counter to the thinking of traditional shared on Facebook and Twitter con-
several months in wbich a few sites news organizations, which have been sists ofWeb links that search engines
were invited to test it. Today, Facebook reluctant even to link to other sites cannot see or index. This poses for
says more than 15,000 sites have for fear that users will click away and Google the most serious threat yet
implemented the service, including not come back. to achieving its corporate mission:
YouTube, CNN, Digg and Microsoft's Meanwhile, Twitter has become a "to organize the world's information
XBox Live service for gamers. While widely recognized (and sometimes and make it universally accessible
this means online users are becoming ridiculed) phenomenon not because of and useful."
accustomed to being offered the option Tv\itter.com,asite experienced through • As Facebook and Twitter increase
of logging in with their Facebook ID, a Web browser, but because of add- their ability to understand users and
they might not grasp just how novel ons such as Twhirl and Tweetdeck. their behavior, they could become
this service is by the standards of This software for personal computers formidable advertising platforms-
traditional media thinking. manages people's Twitter experience, competing with original-content
The students—Brian Boyer, Ryan Mark, Angela Nitzke, Joshua Pollock, Stuart
Tiffen, and Kayla Webley—documented their experience and findings in a blog and a
comprehensive report available at www.crunchberry.org.
J
udging from their widespread
adoption, it's hard to find a tech- decisions reached will vary for differ- interactions that strengthen the brand
nology that news organizations ent news enterprises based on their and form and maintain relationships
don't embrace. Read the Los Angeles circumstances and needs. that bond users of various platforms
Times on Kindle. Watch ABC News on to news organizations. If these are
YouTube. Leave a comment on a blog Determining Technology's the primary benefits of contemporary
about media and marketing from the Value technologies, news organizations must
Chicago Sun-Times. Listen to apodcast become much more sophisticated in
of "On Science" from National Public News organizations are operating with their thinking about them and how
Radio. Participate in adiscussion board constrained budgets in highly dynamic to achieve those benefits.
hosted by The Washington Post about markets.' Clear strategies must govern Each platform requires clear and
college admissions. Receive SMS news all uses of journalistic, financial and distinct strategies, as does the overall
about the Dallas Cowboys from The human resources allocated for these use of multiple platforms. If interac-
Dallas Morning News. Get features technologies. Merely because a tecb- tions are the goal, the reason for each
from Time on a PDA and tweets of nology is popular with some users interaction needs to be clearly delin-
breaking news from CNN. and journalists does not mean that eated. And what should it accomplish?
The mantra for news organizations its use will be beneficial to the news What messages and images should it
is to be anywhere, anytime, on any enterprise as a whole. project of the news organization? How
platform. But is this strategy really a Here's a sensible first question to are the benefits of those interactions
good idea? In an era when the busi- raise: How will the use of a given to be measured?
ness models for news are stressed, technology generate money? Even if the value turns out not to
hard thinking should be done in as- And if its uses don't generate be measured in financial terms, clear
sessing the opportunities that various money—or, at the very least, pay for goals ought to be set fortb in terms
technologies present. It isn't the time their full costs—one needs to have an of return on the investment—such as
merely to be copying what others are exceptionally clear answer as to why the effect on brand equity, number of
doing. it is being used at all. Reasons can be unique users served, and the move-
Tough questions must be asked to found to use some without full cost ment of nonusers to paid products.
figure out which of the new technolo- recovery, but those should be based These goals should be articulated and
gies is beneficial for journalism and on strategic thinking and informed pursued, and performance in reach-
the business of journalism. Is each choice, not on technological hype and ing them measured. When forming
one equally useful? What are the real exuberance. stronger relationships is the goal,
costs in staff time and the operating In the decade and a half since the clear strategies need to be stated. How
costs to be on the various platforms? Internet emerged as a viable medium, personalizing communications across
What is actually achieved for the news and the decade since mobile communi- platforms will happen also needs to
organization in beingthere? Does every cations became practicable, questions be considered.
news organization need to be active on ofhow content providers can effectively Methods for measuring and evalu-
all of the platforms? Finally, how can earn money from either have remained ating performance have to be devel-
a news organization achieve optimal prominent. The lack of truly effective oped. These should be used to track
benefit across platforms? revenue models to support the gather- the effectiveness of any of these new
The answers we find might lead ing and distribution of news has led approaches to determine whether
to deciding which of these technolo- many to argue that providing this serves the money spent and other resources
In the Winter 2006 issue of Nieman Reports, Picard wrote an article entitled "Capital
Crisis in the Profitable Newspaper Industry," in which he observed that this crisis had
arrived "at a time when the newspaper industry is struggling, too, to respond to changes
in technologies, society and in how consumers use media." His article can be read at
www.niemanreports.org.
F
or the longest time, whenever I after day I'd fruitlessly comb through tainable only through years of reading
read the news, I've often felt the the stories for an explanation of their news stories and looking for patterns,
depressing sensation of lacking relevance, history or import. Nut grafs accumulating knowledge like so many
the background I need to understand seemed to provide only enough infor- cereal box tops I could someday cash
the stories that seem truly important. mation for me to realize the story was in for the prize of basic understand-
Day after day would bring front pages out of my depth. ing. Meanwhile, though, with the
wath headlines trumpeting new de- I came to think of following the advancements of the Web and cable
velopments out of city hall, and day news as requiring a decoder ring, at- news, the pace of new headlines was
A
ll of us icarn to write in the second grade," basketball
coach Bobby Knight once quipped, "but most of us
go on to other things." UTiile aimed at sportswriters,
knight's insult likely evokes empathctic laughter from exec-
utives, many of whom think much the same of journalists
attempting to cover their company or industry. As someone
who earns a living in the discipline of writing—and who in the
past endured plenty of rants from high-school and college bas-
ketball coaches—I'm less amused.
The dynamics behind Knight's remark, however, are fas-
cinating. Americans may be reading fewer daily papers, and our
attention spans may be shrinking, but we continue to rely on
writers.
Along with supplying citizens with useful information on
vita] issues, news organizations serve as a check on abuses of
power that law enforcement might overlook, including mis-
deeds in government, by the clergy, and, of course, by busi-
ness. An upbeat CNN spot about a new product can boost a
company's reputation with customers and investors, while
a Bloomberg exposé about toys colored witb lead paint—or a
revelation of suspicious disclosure as
Even well-trained Well, it might be someone who learned to write in the sec-
ond grade and failed to go on to other things—which would be
reporters get just worth a chuckle were it not for the fact that business is now
front-page news. After all, it was a young Fonune magazine
writer named Bethany McLean who, back in 2001, began
as excited—and as poking around the numbers of a high-flying Houston-based
corporation and at first thought it inconceivable that the com-
blinded—by novel pany's executives would engage in fraud. But when she wrote
a feature headlined, "Is Enron Overpriced?", that corporation's
trends as any entre- subsequently spectacular, criminal, and now iconic flameout
not only dominated business reports but resonated through-
out North American culture and beyond.
preneur or investor. The thing is, we are not only a nation of investors but ac-
tive participants in a highly competitive global economy that
in some dimensions seems to be running askew. We're acutely
quantity and brevity compromises understanding. Has society aware that the fortunes of an individual industry matters to
and the profession unraveled to the point where Mad Money's far more people than its employees, since the ripple effect of,
manic Jim Cramer—arguably perched at a far end of the jour- say, a mortgage crisis cuts deep across economic sectors and
nalistic continuum—has an influence equa! to that of the lat- through entire regions. Moreover, there's a pervasive dread
est issue of Foitiim-} These are frightening thoughts indeed. concerning what will happen next, and a hunger for someone
Boo-yah, as Cramer might say. prescient to hand out clues.
Unfortunately, the press hasn't done well in the early-
"Who'll Protect the Public?" warning department. After all, why didn't the business press
In an attempt to offer informed perspective on questions catch on to the dotcom bubble before it popped? Where was
that probably have few concrete answers, this article incor- the reporting on the risks of subprime lending, which in ret-
porates two somewhat different stories wrapped into one. The rospect seem obvious? Why didn't journalists ask whether
first deals with the state of business journalism in America, a diverting corn crops to motor fuels might hit global food sup-
field that is fragmenting like Pangaea, only in accelerated rather plies harder than any climate change? The truth is that even
than geologic time. 1 he second part addresses the often-con- well-trained reporters get just as excited—and as blinded—
tentious relationship between businesses and the media. by novel trends as any entrepreneur or investor.
I was asked to write this assessment mainly because of a ca-
reer that includes more than thirty years in corporate com- An Entropie Devolution
munications, mostly at Chevron. That experience allowed me Was it ever different? Was there ever a Golden Age of
to see and craft features about operations around the world, business journalism, perhaps when Peter Drucker and Ed Mur-
write speeches for the chairman of the board, deal with out- row combined to deliver timely reports replete with truth,
side journalists, and eventually sit on the leadership team of an justice, and the American Way of earning an honest profit?
operating company with 26,000 people and about $8 billion in Not in this part of the known universe.
capital employed, an exposure to the w hite-hot innards of the "But there was a time in the 1980s when business journal-
business. Over the same three decades, 1 spent nights, week- ism in the United States was a growth area," says Tom Rosen-
ends, and vacations writing articles on a wide range of topics stiel, a former Lo.r Angeles Times media critic who now beads
for the likes oi Playboy, Smithsonian, Reader\f; Digest, Aiidulmn, the Project for Excellence in Journalism, affiliated with the
and this magazine. I even co-authored a book on the business Pew Research Center. "The business sections ot newspapers
of the wine industry. were profitable and growing. Journalism schools were packed
U^en it comes to business and the press, I've been on and with students who wanted into the field, and for a time the
appreciate the viewpoints of both sides. profession flowered. And then things stagnated."
And it's critical that business reporting be both better and The 2001 recession put a huge crimp in the personal-finance
better-understood than ever before. As Northwestern Uni- field, which had funded advertising that supported newspa-
versity journalism professor George Harmon pointed out in pers and business mag-azines, suggests the University of Mis-
a post on the website of the Donald W. Reynolds National souri School of Journalism's Martha Steffens, who holds the
Center for Business Journalism: "Sixty percent of the voters school's Society of American Business Editors and Writers
are now investors. They must manage their own retirement chair in business and financial journalism. As online services
nest eggs. If companies' books are deceptive, if analysts are and T V channels devoted to business developed, the need for
compromised, if mutual funds are sneaky, if the Securities stock listings in newspapers faded, eliminating a major com-
and Exchange Conunission is undermanned, who'll protect ponent of the section's reason for being. "The entire business
the public?" model for newspapers changed," Steffens explains. "Reporters
company is not shown in a completely positive light, then they ence analysts, investors, consumers, and even the price of a
want retribution." public firm's stock. Just ask the owner of a new restaurant,
Or there's an implicit threat that a reporter just might not or the producer of a Broadway show, what a bad review does
get an invitation to a company's next big product release— for business. And it's plainly evident to me that news organi-
something that, when issued by a rock-star firm such as Dis- zations all too often headline stories critical of a company or
ney or Apple, a tech reporter can't afford to miss. ''I find it industry with an assertion made by a plaintiff's lawyer or
completely frustrating when public-relations people attempt activist group, while burying tbe company's response many
to control every message and the direction of every story you paragraphs below. VVbetber the charge is real or manufac-
attempt to do about their employer," says another friend tured—and make no mistake, there are cases in which flimsy
who is a veteran T V reporter in the San Francisco Bay Area, claims are no more than organized shakedowns—the fall-
a crack general-assignment journalist who brings a fresh and out is real.
fairly well-informed mind to business stories. "Some are worse In turn, corporations continually court media attention in
than politicians. And tbey don't really know wbat constitutes an attempt to get the kind of coverage that serves as a third-
a legitimate news story. If you offend tbeir superiors, there's party endorsement of the firm's product or service. W^Tiile
always the possibility that they'll cut off access, which puts serving as executive editor of the now-defunct Culifornia CEO,
the reporter in an awkward position. If people at these cor- I received dozens of press releases each week from PR firms,
porations only understand the concept of takeaway value— asking that we interview this or that CEO or write about
which is the general feeling a viewer holds, and is much dif- a project or product. Tbere probably isn't a company of any
ferent from the one or two facts upon which executives an- size out there that doesn't have someone tracking its media
grily fixate—they'd interact with media with much more coverage. And it's the rare executive who doesn't regularly
equanimity." read The Wall Street Journal^ several oí the major magazines,
and a daily clip file with copies of stories about her company
Public Engagement or industry, information that's essential for running a busi-
Companies are understandably sensitive about their treat- ness. Ignoring press coverage is like failing to brush your teeth
ment by journalists, since media reports can xiltimately influ- before a date.
FEI@75 ence for business news than ever before, and a greater capac-
ity to deliver it. Financial executives, especially public com-
pany CFOs, are often in the forefront of those supplying infor-
: Business
business, perhaps greater than ever. Sometimes the influ-
ence is overt, as happened earlier this year when press cov-
erage of a professor's research into backdated options
spurred intensified regulatory interest and a stock market
Takes Off with information about companies that had defaulted on their
loans, auditors were more likely to issue a negative opinion
if the press had cov-
ered the default.
"What was startling
about this research is
reader of the business nev^sfrom the 1930s in a time Technology, public that there was no new
capsule and spirit him to today's world, and his head would information in the
truly be spinning. A world of gray type and subdued cover- appetite and far more press, just a repeti-
age has evolved into splashes of color everywhere, charts tion of information
^nd graphs, talking or even shouting heads on cable TV (think sophistication in available in the audit
Mad Money's Jim Cramer on CNBC) and dramatically more delivery have conspired work papers, yet audi-
attention on the world of business and commerce. Even that tors were more con-
bastion of literary excellence, The New Yorker, has a regu- to radically transform servative once they
iar business column. saw an article," says
Like virtually everything else, business journalism has been
the face of business
Jennifer Joe, assistant
transformed by technology. Computers replaced lead type; journalism in recent professor of Account-
color presses created whole new palettes. Television evolved ing at the Georgia
from a small, gray box to high-definition and plasma. Cor- decades. That's been State University's
respondents, many hired less for their knowiedge than their
looks, now chatter with executives and analysts on cable TV
both good and bad, Mack Robinson Col-
lege of Business.
programs. Even now, the Internet now seems to be the future with many in the Sometimes the
of much of communication in an attention-deficit world in
influence shapes how
which depth is often disappearing. profession itself business people see
That's not to say, however, that serious and important sto- bemoaning a focus on themselves and their
ries about business aren't being done. They remain a staple businesses, and lasts
of major newspapers like The Wall Street Journal and The entertainment instead for years. George
New York Times, as weli as the major business magazines
like Fortune, Forbes and BusinessWeek. There's a bigger audi- of information.
Gendron, who edited
Inc. magazine through
October 2005 19
th
Anniversary
Disclosure, and the growing demand for corpo- Yet in the U.S., a different model of the busi-
rate information, were reviewed in a June 1980 ness press is ascendant. Robert Dilenschnelder,
article, "Corporate Disclosure in the 1980s." The author founder of the PR and investor relations firm
noted that "the historical pattern of 'more and The Dilenschneider Group, says, "I think the
more' — which some seem to equate mistakenly business media are less influential today."
with 'more is better' — can be illustrated by com- Marshall Loeb adds, "Surely much of the
paring the space used for financial disclosure in a business press is spending less of its
typical 1970 annual report, as opposed to the space resources getting to the deep and compli-
used for a 1979 annual report. That space has proba- cated stories."
bly doubled or more."
Media critic Marek Fuchs of
In the March/April 1992 issue of Financial
theStreet.com faults business journalists
Executive, Joe Rodgers, executive vice president and
CFO of Quantum Corp., related how the role of for their lack of business experience,
investor relations had grown at his company and business understanding or even interest
become structured so that the company could send a in business, "Very few grow up with any
consistent message to investors. Rodgers confessed interest in business, and it shows all over
that he was spending 40 to 50 percent of his time on the place," he says. Yvette Kantrow. who
various elements of investor relations, including writes a closely watched column on media
meetings with individual institutions and analysts. matters as executive editor of The Deal,
By late 2000, even as a red-hot stock market points out that after the experience of
began to cool, clamor erupted over the perception Enron, "You would think that people would
that some analysts were getting privileged informa- Second-Lien
want the business press to be more serious,
Lending
tion from companies. A new rule. Regulation Fair '
Rides a to crunch numbers. But nobody wants to
Disclosure, or Reg FD, required that all investors be Gusher read it, unfortunately, or not a big enough
made equally aware of potentially market-moving
information. audience. A lot of people bemoaned the state
of business journalism, but it went farther,
Jim Davis, senior vice president and CFO of Tul-
sa-based Parker Drilling Co., told writer Gregory fluffier."
Millman in Financial Executive early in 2001 that Jim Michaels, editor emeritus of Forbes,
compliance with the rule may expose companies to oth- sees in the move to the Web not only a threat to adver-
er legal risks. "If you put out a forecast, whether in a tising dollars but also a force in the dumbing down of jour-
press release or webcast or whatever, if you don't caveat nalism. "In a magazine, you have to give readers what they
every statement you make, you run the risk that some want or they won't take it, but you also give them things
enterprising shareholder or attorney is going to compare
they may not be passionate about but ought to know,
actual results with forecasted results and sue you if actu-
al doesn't meet forecast," Davis said. "On the Web, everything is driven by hits, and if It does-
n't get hits, you won't run it. So what are they hit on? Look
Fortunately for CFOs, that blizzard of suits has never
materialized. at anybody's website, and usually they'll list the five or 10
— Jeffrey Marshall
October 2006
most popular stories of the day. ings on corporate finance. However, in the 1970s, he turned
Look at what they are: women are his attention to the press, arguing that it is economically
sexier than men, new study rational for people to merely tolerate information as an acci-
shows; eating tomatoes protects dental by product of the entertainment they seek in the press.
you from breast cancer; some Jensen drew heavily on the work of the jaded Sage of Bal-
movie star and her husband go to timore, H.L- Mencken, who in the early decades of the 20th
Namibia to have a baby. I'm not century wrote that the newspaper with aspirations to prof-
kidding you!" itability should pander to the simple minds and baser
George Gendron notes, instincts of the masses, scaring them with threats and then
"There are hugely significant reassuring them with simpiistic and unchallenging remedies.
St)c ^Vur jjork <Bmt» scoops that highly ambitious Jensen's analysis suggested that it would be economically
journalists in the past would have irrational for people to seek anything but entertainment from
ioved to tackle, and they're not even the press. After all, a rational economic actor would recog-
being done. It's not a question of nize that nothing he or she did as an individual could affect
being done badly — people don't the outcome, so investing resources in a serious considera-
bother pitching them any more." tion of issues doesn't pay.
"In addition," Jensen wrote, "Peoples' intolerance of ambi-
Medicine and Sugar guity causes them to demand answers to questions; includ-
One high-minded view of business ing those that are unanswerable. As a result, the media is
journalism sees it as making some generally in the business of providing simple answers to com-
compromise with such public tastes plex problems whose answers are unknown, and it must do
by offering the medicine of infor- so in an entertaining way."
mation in a sugar coating of enter- Although Jensen published his articles on the press in the
tainment. Now that the Web makes '70s, they were prescient. Indeed, his analysis neatly accounts
it possible for readers to take the for every great business scandal story of the past few decades.
sugar without the medicine, serious "Michael Milken, what he did for the economy and the world
journalism is under threat. But
of finance was remarkable, and he ended up being pilloried
what if serious journalists were
as a crook, which he isn't," says Jensen. "You see what's
kidding themselves all along?
being done with Wal-Mart. Here's a company that has con-
What if providing information
tributed more to consumers getting low prices and an amaz-
wasn't ever their real job? There's
ing selection of goods, even in the boondocks, and provid-
some dispassionate econom-
ing work for people on the margin of the labor force. Now,
ic analysis to support the
they've become a national icon of evil."
argument that the public nev-
People will get the kind of press that they demand, or settle
er looked to the press for
nformation. for. If people are really looking for entertainment, it makes sense
when the press stokes and strokes the public mood instead of
Michael C. Jensen, Jesse digging and prodding to get obscure, difficult, expensive-to-
Isidor Straus Professor of Busi- unearth but momentous facts. If people are really looking for
ness Administration, Emeritus, entertainment, it maizes sense that journalists
it the Harvard Business
don't invest time in learning to read financial
:>chool, is best
reports or understand the trade-offs involved in
known for his writ-
a free market economic system.
October 2006
It even makes sense if the press spends one decade build- aged to weather the industry storm by focusing on a nar-
ing up celebrity CEOs, and the next decade attacking CEOs row audience that does demand quality, competence and seri-
who get paid like celebrities. That's a game H.L. Mencken ousness of purpose. If such audiences expand or multiply,
would have understood perfectly well — indeed, he wrote it's reasonable to expect that one way or another the press
the playbook. will be there to serve them.
It's hard to find much justification for a noble view of the And in the larger sweep of history, business coverage has
press's role, or for optimism that business journalism will raise improved in many ways. Loeb says it is "a hell of a lot bet-
its standards. Yet, it's not impossible. Author and historian ter than it was 50 years ago or even 25 years ago." That may
W, Joseph Campbell, author of the new book. The Year that be one of the few points on which Loeb and his former Forbes
Defined Journalism: 1897 and the Clash of Paradigms, sees archrival, Jim Michaels, agree. "I joined Forbes in June of 1954,
grounds for encouragement. and business journalism was very much a backwater,"
Michaels says. "Newspapers would put their drunks and
Events in that pivotal year, Campbell says, defined jour-
burned-out cases on the business page. The New York Times
nalism for the next century; newspapers were struggling
would almost never put an economic or investment story on
against a background of new communication technologies
the front page — you could go weeks and weeks without
and fickle public tastes. Scrambling for solvency, newspa-
seeing it. The business media was pretty small."
pers were laying off reporters in droves. Out of the turmoil,
a new model of journalism emerged. "The rip tide of That's no longer true, of course. It's much larger, and more
change has swept American journalism in the past, and we've fragmented as well, with the growth of investor-oriented mag-
emerged the better for it," he concludes. azines like Money and Smart Money, and the slew of tech-
nology titles (like Wired) that have sprung up in the past
A New Form of Creative Destruction? decade. Trade magazines, too, have emerged and grown to
That could happen again in the new century. Creative fill perceived voids in specialty subjects.
destruction at the beginning of the 20th century resulted in And then there is television. Channels like Bloomberg and
industry consolidation and the formation of great media CNBC haven't been with us that long, but they are filling
empires. Creative destruction in this century may result in the airwaves will all kinds of data, much of it arguably short-
their dissolution, but it's possible that breaking up media con- lived. Some of the analysis that used to appear only in print
glomerates could lead to a more efficient and effective jour- has now moved to the Web, where it has far more immedi-
nalism industry. acy. The Web has also abetted the emergence of journalists
Meanwhile, the school of hard knocks may already have as quasi-celebrities, as authorities whose views you can call
begun the job of educating the audience to greatness. A pub- up with a quick click of a mouse.
lic shocked to discover that it couldn't believe what it read During the technology bubble, CEOs and CFOs were lin-
in the papers about Enron and WorldCom and tech stocks ing up to tout their stories, and their stocks, on cable. That
may simply have turned to entertaining fluff in a transient phenomenon has cooled, but surely there will be another
fit of pique, as a respite.^ to forget, the way an adolescent wave of business information, another surge of excitement
turns from a heartbreaking summer romance. — perhaps from somewhere we can't even yet envision.
Any day now, the audience may return, more mature and For financial executives, the challenge will be to sort out
wiser, to demand and reward incisive, competent, deep and the noise and the chaff, and understand the best ways to
challenging business journalism, the kind that requires mas- glean information they need and to communicate their sto-
sive investment of time and money and the willingness to ries to stakeholders.
risk legal challenges. Readers may be on the verge of toss-
ing the sugar aside to go straight for the medicine. Gregory J. Millman ([email protected]) is a freelance writer
A few business publications, such as The Deal, have man- in New Jersey and a frequent contributor to Financial Executive.
October 2006 23
LIONEL BARBER 146
APRIL 2010
147 VITAL SPEECHES international
an international economic actor on the rest of the world. base, not just through procurement but also through tax
This impact ranges from the contest for commodities in policy. The danger for the UK is that we continue to oper-
resource-rich Africa and Latin America, to the rise of mul- ate a hands-off policy regarding foreign bids and takeovers
tinational Chinese companies looking for foreign acquisi- while at the same time adopting fiscal measures which ei-
tions, and the establishment of a maritime navy with the ther discourage inward investment or damage prospects for
ambition to the secure control of sea-lanes in the Pacific start-ups or mature companies which operate in the UK.
and Indian oceans. Sir John Rose of Rolls-Royce, one of the few world class
China is now the world’s largest exporter, supplant- manufacturers in this country, has spoken eloquently about
ing Germany; China is the world’s largest importer of raw this risk. Many other leading businessmen see things the
materials; the Chinese consume more cars than the Ameri- same way. There is no point in putting up a “For Sale” sign
cans. On IMF data, the share of China and India in world in Britain, if there is little or no prospect of replacing those
GDP at purchasing power parity will rise from 7 per cent to companies with our own.
18 per cent between 1992 and 2010. The US share in the Let me now turn to the financial services industry. Now
latter year is 19.6 per cent. as one of my FT colleagues remarked impishly the other
In London, we are slowly waking up to the new power- day: it may seem strange for Britain to seek comparative ad-
shift. The Pru’s bid to acquire the Asian assets of AIG, the vantage in the world’s most irresponsible industry. But the
fallen American insurance behemoth, is testimony to the serious point is that the financial services sector is still enor-
untapped potential of the Asian consumer. HSBC’s decision mously important to the economy. It employs vastly more
to relocate its chief executive Michael Geoghegan to Hong people outside London than inside the City. A host of other
Kong is another hint of things to come. So is the decision services industries such as lawyers and accountants rely on
of legendary investor Anthony Bolton to step out of retire- the financial services eco-system for their well-being.
ment and move to Hong Kong to set up funds specialising Equally, it seems fairly obvious that we allowed the
in Chinese equities. financial services sector to become too large relatively to
So what do these trends mean for the British economy? the rest of the economy. So while banking and financial
In my view, they make it imperative that we identify those services accounted for 27 per cent of all corporate tax take
sectors and industries where we can make a difference in for government at the height of the boom in 2007, the
the global market place. Once we have identified these “an- cost of the ensuing bust to the taxpayer is now close to
chors”, both private equity and venture capital have impor- £100bn. Although some of that money will eventually be
tant roles to play as growth engines. recouped as the government disposes of its equity stakes in
What might those anchors be? Here are five suggestions, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland, it is still a terrible price
none of which is particularly original but which nonethe- to pay—and it accounts for the political backlash against
less constitutes areas where the British can aspire to excel- bankers and the fat target of bonuses.
lence: financial services, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, the However, there is a real danger of the backlash going too
low carbon economy, and higher education. far. The FT supported, reluctantly, the special tax on bonuses
Incidentally, I have deliberately left out the creative in- on the grounds that banks’ profits were benefiting from an
dustries, on the grounds that I am, so to speak, parti pris. implicit government guarantee and extraordinarily favour-
In our own modest way, the FT has sought to achieve a able trading conditions based on record low interest rates.
leadership position, building a brand with the authority But this last levy must be a one-off. Governments will be
and sweep to challenge other global media organisations, tempted to take further measures, if only because of the dire
albeit in a niche at the top of the end of the market for state of public finances. They do so at their peril. More un-
business and financial information and analysis. predictability is likely to lead to a slow exodus from the City.
Now talk of “anchors” may prompt accusations of London does enjoy unique advantages because of its
“Bennery”, picking winners in a 1970s-style industrial geographical location in the centre of the world’s time
policy. But it is surely time to move beyond such carica- zone, the supremacy of the English language and the rule
tures. Having worked as a journalist for 10 years in the US, of law. But other financial centres—New York, Dubai, Sin-
I have witnessed first-hand how the US government exerts gapore and Shanghai, let alone Paris and Frankfurt—are
a profound influence over industry. Look at government competing for similar business. This government—and the
procurement and its impact on the defence and aerospace next—should avoid taking any unilateral measures which
industry. Not for nothing did Dwight Eisenhower invoke put Britain at a disadvantage.
the phrase of the military-industrial complex. Look at the So where does that put private equity? First, the indus-
role of the Small Business Administration. Look at sundry try should be congratulated for improving their communi-
legislation such as the Jones Act which protects merchant cation to the general public. Now that wasn’t too difficult,
shipping. I could go on. was it Simon? Let’s be clear: private equity has undoubtedly
Other governments in emerging market countries have served as an engine of growth. The industry’s reputation
equally understood how they can shape their economic rests on the claim to be good corporate citizens enjoying
VITALSPEECHESINTERNATIONAL.COM
148
a superior operating performance to publicly listed com- achieved global scale? Where are Britain’s Googles, Yahoos
panies. But if I may engage in provocation, the question and Twitters. OK, we had Bebo—but they just sold out, ad-
remains, how far are you prepared to go? mittedly at a handsome price.
If deals, especially at the big cap end, involve piling The obvious answer is that the US market alone offers
companies high with debt which weakens them in good scale. But we should also look at other factors, starting
times, inhibits their ability to invest in growth, drains the with our universities, the hubs of innovation. By my count,
public purse of corporation tax by substituting debt for only two of the top 20 universities in the world are British,
equity, then that claim is in jeopardy—(especially if the exit America is home to 17 of the others and California alone
involves a sale through Swiss holding companies without has three of the top ten. Our top universities have long
payment of tax). been wary of incubating commercial innovation or promot-
The second, related challenge is to demonstrate that ing world class business schools. And while there are signs
private equity’s claim to superiority rests on operational of attitudes changing, there is a genuine need to forge clos-
performance rather than financial engineering based on er relationships between business and our universities to
favourable debt and capital markets. Given the dramatic stimulate the development of intellectual property, properly
fall in global fund-raising in 2009 compared to 2008, and and efficiently enforced through patent law.
the overall decline in deal value (despite signs of an up-tick In this respect, I look forward to the results of the
in the fourth quarter), the industry still has something to Browne review of higher education funding which should
prove. The third challenge is succession: we have seen one help to strengthen the independence of universities. I
or two tensions as founding partners have either exited or also welcome the pre-Budget’s adoption of a “patent box”
been “exited”. The fourth challenge will be to manage rela- which ringfences incomes derived from patents and gives
tions with stakeholders ranging from trade unions, sover- them more favourable tax treatment. The arrangement has
eign wealth funds and pension fund trustees in a post-crisis already been introduced in Belgium, the Netherlands and
world in which the financial services sector faces greater Switzerland and could be an important stimulus for invest-
scrutiny. And the fifth and final challenge will be to deal
with a tougher regulatory framework.
In this context, the EU’s Alternative Investment Directive
is profoundly misguided, if not vindictive. It targets private
equity and hedge funds which, despite dire predictions on
the European continent, were not responsible for the global
financial crisis. The causes, as any reader of the FT will
know, were a toxic combination of leverage, lax regulation,
conflicted ratings agencies, and global imbalances, notably
between excess spending in the US and excess savings in
China and other Asian countries. While this directive is still
subject to modification, it is still onerous. In the words of
one private equity boss: a headache rather than handcuffs.
Let me now turn to the venture capital industry which,
if properly harnessed could and should play a vital role in
the revival of the British economy. No doubt there is much
to be done in terms of tax breaks to encourage investors to
back young and growing companies. More generous treat-
ment for research and development, say; or raising Enter-
prise Investment Scheme allowances to a 50 per cent tax
write off with the upper limit raised to £1m per annum.
But to engage (again) in a bit of provocation: why is
it that Britain has produced few start-ups which have
APRIL 2010
150 VITAL SPEECHES OF THE DAY
VSOTD.COM
152 VITAL SPEECHES OF THE DAY
Baghdad bureaus, as we at the FT among other news catching innovation compared to their stodgy US rivals.
organisations know, are very expensive. But so are Beijing, But they have essentially applied 20th century solutions
and Washington, and Moscow, and Berlin, and Paris, and such as new design, formats and aggressive marketing—to
Johannesburg. For the FT, which has more than 100 staff a 21st century problem, primarily fragmented audiences,
foreign correspondents, these bureaus are essential. They new advertising platforms, and massive digital storage ca-
are part of the DNA of our news organisation. pacity through so-called cloud computing.
For others, they were once a vital source of news. Now, In the age of the personal computer, the Mac or the
because of financial pressures and relentless cost cutting, iPad, people are more likely to identify themselves as en-
they can be no longer for many sections of the mainstream abled consumers rather than as passive readers of a daily
media. So the foreign bureaus go—and a window on the newspaper. So what is the way forward for the news busi-
world slams shut. ness and how has the Financial Times managed this perilous
In the summer of 2009, I modestly predicted that most transition from print to digital?
major news organisations would be charging for content Ever since its foundation in 1888, the FT, with its roots in
within 12 months. Charging, I argued, would not only the City of London, has been a specialist newspaper not a gen-
plug the revenue gap; it would also help to re-establish eral newspaper. Sir Gordon Newton, our greatest editor, who
value in their news product. sat in the chair from 1949 to 1972, once defined the FT’s mis-
This past year, pay walls have gone up around content sion as reaching those people who influence or seek to influ-
that was previously free. News International has been a no- ence decisions in business, finance and public affairs around
table convert. This year, pay walls will appear around the the world. This is indeed the essence of FT journalism.
content of the New York Times and, as the FT has reported, As our coverage of the global financial crisis shows, we
the Daily Telegraph too. connect the dots, between the sheikhs in Dubai, to the oli-
The hope in this is that people will wish to continue to garchs in Russia, to the central banks in Beijing, Frankfurt,
read the content that these organisations provide—and will London and Washington.
subscribe. The risk is that they will simply go elsewhere— Now, we do not always hit the ball out of the park. Like
to a free news site, like the BBC—or indeed, any major many other news organisations, we were, with two notable
broadcaster. exceptions, too slow to highlight the risks ahead of the
For the BBC and others, a free website is an obvious and bursting of the credit bubble. Commentators such as Mar-
relatively cheap addendum to their main purpose of stream- tin Wolf and Gillian Tett correctly identified the dangers
ing news and entertainment on screen to a mass audience. in global financial imbalances and exotic debt instruments
In this respect, I was pleased to see that the BBC has at such as credit default swaps. But we did not always give
last begun to recognise the economic threat that BBC on- them quite the front or full page exposure they deserved.
line poses to newspapers, particularly those in the regions. Overall, the challenge for all news organisations is to ex-
The sharp cuts in the BBC’s online budget go some, if not ploit the power of the brand across all platforms, from print
all the way, towards redressing the balance. Further steps in to digital. The FT’s strategy can be summed up in five points.
this direction, including relaxing restrictions on cross me- First, we doubled the price of the newspaper on the
dia ownership in the provinces outside London, should be retail stand in Britain and raised cover prices elsewhere
considered by the government. around the world. The price hike had little impact on sales,
For those publications adopting pay walls, the strategy but generated substantial extra revenue. More important, it
represents a big leap into uncharted territory. Those which sent a powerful signal to the market and to our own jour-
remain free or substantially free, have another kind of nalists that the FT was a premium product.
hope: that the very large audiences they are able to garner Second, we rapidly developed our subscription busi-
through freely available content will boost sales—or at least ness, both digitally on ft.com and in newspaper form. That
slow the decline of the print edition. The other gamble for way we reduced our dependence on the casual purchaser
the free content camp is that they can gather sufficient ad- in favour of the loyal subscriber. Coincidentally, we shifted
vertising to provide the editorial budget which they need the terms of debate here in the UK away from the febrile
to sustain a major newspaper. New offerings such as online confines of the monthly ABC circulation figures to a broad-
dating services may also boost the bottom line. Now it is er and more meaningful definition of audience, based on
true that digital revenues are increasing rapidly, albeit from both print and digital consumers.
a relatively low base. The question is whether the migra- Third, we swung firmly behind the principle of charg-
tion will occur in sufficient volume and at sufficient pace to ing for content. At the height of the dotcom bubble, we
compensate for the decline in print. havered between charging for business news while offering
For all these extenuating factors, the broader criticism general news for free. In practice, the distinction, at least
is that the British newspaper industry has mismanaged its for FT readers, was meaningless. So we came up with an
own decline. ingenious compromise.
Yes, British broadsheets and tabloids have displayed eye- From 2007, we started charging for all content, albeit
VSOTD.COM
LIONEL BARBER 153
based on a meter model. Users would be given a limited ment, the new balance of power between the mainstream
number of free articles to entice them into first registering journalist and other non-traditional aggregators of news,
and later signing up for subscription. analysis and commentary?
Four years on, the meter model has proved to be an Now there may be some in the audience who find it
industry pioneer and an unequivocal success. FT.com now surprising for a newspaper editor to dwell so long on the
has more than 3.2m registered users and more than business side of the news business. But in my judgement
200,000 paid subscribers. Other publications, including newspaper editors need to be actively involved in strategic
the New York Times, are now adopting or about to adopt decisions affecting the business. Many on the commercial
similar meter models. side would appear to agree.
Fourth, we abandoned or revised arrangements which In the past decade or more, many journalists with a
allowed other news providers or aggregators to sell our background in business journalism have gone on to be
content to third parties in return for a fee. In future, we national newspaper editors. Peter Stothard and Patience
determined, we would sell direct to our customers. And we Wheatcroft, my old colleagues from the Sunday Times
would aggressively pursue any party seeking through cook- Business News section, as well as James Harding, Will Lew-
ies or sharing of password to gain access to our content for is and Robert Thomson from the Financial Times.
free. Yes, believe it or not, some people do still think there I am tempted to suggest that the FT should henceforth
is free lunch with the FT. be renamed the GE School of Journalism given the number
Fifth and finally, we made significant changes in the of first-rate former FT journalists now occupying the com-
newsroom which complemented our commercial strategy. manding heights of British journalism.
Back in 1999, the FT pioneered the concept of the inte- Of course, there will always be thick red lines between
grated newsroom. We put all web journalists on the same editorial and commercial. We at the FT are more than mind-
contracts as print colleagues. And we required all journal- ful of anything which could compromise the integrity of our
ists to work both for the print and digital channels. More journalism or our reputation, our most valuable asset.
than a decade later, we have a fully flexible and integrated The case for close co-operation remains unanswerable.
news operation in which reporters and editors work seam- In these revolutionary times, I am tempted to quote Ben-
lessly in print and online. jamin Franklin on the signing of the Declaration of Inde-
These changes have put us in the best possible position pendence. “We must all hang together or assuredly we will
to develop new niches, with more depth and focus to at- hang separately.”
tract new audiences such as FT Alphaville, our award-win- Let me now turn to more current sources of controversy,
ning financial blog or FT Tilt, our new emerging markets notably the WikiLeaks phenomenon and the phone-hack-
service, or our prize-winning iPad application which has ing scandal. While each is very different and each raises
brought in extra revenue and subscriptions. And, inciden- important questions for public policy, there is a single
tally, I believe the tablet is the most exciting technological common thread: the transformational power of technology
development in recent years, a game-changer because it which is rendering media laws and practice obsolete.
has all the feel of a newspaper and the advantages of being First, a few words on the WikiLeaks affair. The two
a dynamic interactive device. industrial scale data-dumps included vivid, if partial US
Let me be very clear: The FT approach does not neces- military dispatches from the front-line in Afghanistan and
sarily lend itself to being adopted by others. We have a Iraq followed by 250,000 classfied diplomatic cables from
distinct advantage because we are both a high-end niche US embassies around the world. Set alongside each other,
product but with weight, global reach, and tradition. they look like the scoops of the century. But as both Alan
We live in a time of great experimentation. There are no Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian and Bill Keller, editor
universal media models, let alone silver-tipped bullets. Each of the New York Times, have recounted: managing the story
news organisation must determine how to distinguish itself and Mr Assange was far from straightforward.
in an increasingly fragmented market, where the consumer Keller describes Assange as a character out of a Stieg
is far more discerning and powerful than ever before. Larsson novel who was “elusive, manipulative, volatile and
Technology cuts both ways. It allows third parties and ultimately openly hostile to the New York Times and Guard-
journalists to slice and dice content to better fit the de- ian.” That will not surprise too many journalists accus-
mands of the consumer. Technology allows the use of con- tomed to dealing with tricky sources, but in this case, other
tent to be measured according to traffic generated. This in equally challenging ethical, legal and practical problems
turn means journalistic supply and, crucially, demand can presented themselves.
be measured in real time. These included how to deal with a US government com-
In theory, these advances threaten to undermine the tra- mitted to protecting classified information; how to conduct
ditional role of journalist as gatekeeper and arbiter of what a cross-border investigation encompassing other media
constitutes news. In practice, the pass has already been organisations; and how to disentangle the newsworthy and
sold. The question is what are the new terms of engage- compelling from tens of thousands of computer-stored
APRIL 2011
154 VITAL SPEECHES OF THE DAY
VSOTD.COM
155
Indeed it took a foreign newspaper—the New York There is a case for rebalancing the right to privacy and
Times—to break fresh ground after an investigation lasting the protections offered by Britain’s overly onerous libel laws
many months. For all that period and more, a conspiracy which are weighted in favour of the well-heeled plaintiff.
of silence ruled Fleet Street. But Westminster should also tread carefully with regard to
As for News International itself, the management failed privacy, lest the rich and famous, on and off the football
to follow the advice its newspapers would have given busi- field, become untouchable.
ness or any other public figure in similar circumstances: More interesting, perhaps, would be to consider wheth-
own up rather than cover up, come clean rather than sur- er it is feasible to introduce curbs on newspaper bribery
reptitiously paying off aggrieved celebrities such as the of employees or other institutions and organisations. This
publicist Max Clifford. may not be unreasonable given the strictures on corporate
The suspicion must remain that News Corporation as- behaviour laid down in the new Bribery Act, though I see
sumed that it enjoyed enough power and influence in Brit- tonight that the government is delaying enactment after
ain to make the phone hacking controversy go away. lobbying by business.
Now, thanks to the overwhelming opposition of its news It would be infinitely more preferable, of course, for the
industry rivals to its bid for BSkyB, that influence is under profession to conduct a rigorous collective self-examina-
threat as never before. tion. Journalism is not perfect, nor was it ever meant to be.
News Corporation can argue, with some justification, But we have allowed our standards to lapse. Let us hope
that opposition to its BSkyB bid is motivated by base com- we have not left it too late.
mercial interests rather than a high-minded concern over Ladies and Gentlemen, whatever its current difficulties,
media plurality. the mainstream media in Britain has much to be proud off.
Yet the concentration of broadcast and print power Despite its preponderance of power in this country, the
which would result from a fully combined BSkyB and BBC remains a world-class brand. Its journalism is rightly
News International’s titles is troublesome, especially in ranked among the best.
the light of still unresolved questions about the extent of Rupert Murdoch remains one of the leading innovators
phone hacking at the News of the World. The bid deserves in the news business. His drive to establish a new paid-for
proper scrutiny by the authorities. Promises about editorial culture in the UK digital business deserves applause.
independence for Sky should be judged in the light of re- And while Britain’s popular press may be gossipy, raucous
peated assurances that the phone hacking was the work of and sensationalist, it reflects at its best, the national mood
a lone actor at the News of the World. and the aspirations of the majority of its readers, as Paul
In the final resort, failure to clean house at all news or- Dacre, one of Britain’s most successful editors (and most in-
ganisations would leave the mainstream media in Britain fluential moral arbiters) noted in an earlier Cudlipp lecture.
at risk of retribution in the form of statutory regulation. Finally, as I mentioned at the beginning of this lecture,
Many MPs are itching to retaliate for the humiliation of media companies across the emerging world are either be-
the expenses scandal, but statutory regulation would be a ing formed or are growing rapidly.
grave step in the wrong direction. Press freedom is woven British media companies could be exporting their brands,
into the fabric of our nation. We do not want to go down insights, talent and technology, just like the advertising busi-
the same road as countries such as Argentina, Hungary and ness before them. As the FT discovered more than a century
South Africa which have adopted or are about to adopt ago, there is a whole world out there to be explored.
new laws curbing press freedom. Democracy, it should be That’s the new frontier in the business of journalism.
remembered, is not just about holding elections. Let’s go for it!
APRIL 2011
Adrianna Kezar and Hannah Yang argue that financial literacy is both an important life skill
and a critical intellectual competency.
THE IMPORTANCE
OF FINANCIAL LITERACY
J
AMES was a university sophomore who thought to citizenship, and as a critical intellectual competency,
he had his finances in order. But the credit is an essential component of a college degree.
card he had opened the preceding year was The President’s Advisory Council on Financial
maxed out and he could only pay the mini- Literacy advocates that postsecondary students learn
mum balance, if that, each month. He had about finances as basic knowledge for citizenship.
already spent the money his parents gave him The council defines financial education as “the pro-
for the month, and the month had just begun. cess by which people improve their understanding of
These stresses began to weigh on him every day; they financial products, services and concepts, so they are
affected his mood, his energy, his motivation, and his empowered to make informed choices, avoid pitfalls,
studies. He started to sleep in and miss his classes. Soon, know where to go for help and take other actions to
he was too far behind in his classes to pass them, and improve their present and long-term financial well-
worse yet, he didn’t care. James ended up withdraw- being” (p. 35). Financial literacy, the council argues,
ing from his classes, losing his financial aid, and going should be part of a complete liberal arts education.
deeper into debt. By engaging in financial literacy activities, students
What is educators’ responsibility for students like hone critical thinking, judgment, and other skills of
James? In this article, we argue that campus communi- a responsible citizen. These activities reach beyond
ties must play a more active role in developing finan- acquisition of basic skills, such as balancing a check-
cial literacy than they currently do—and not just by book, to involve complex understandings of credit
providing counseling in moments of emergency. We and debt, philosophical decisions about appropri-
argue that financial literacy, as a life skill, as a requisite ate risk, and judgment in making consumer choices.
15
ABOUT CAMPUS / JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2010
By engaging in financial literacy activities, students hone
critical thinking, judgment, and other skills
of a responsible citizen.
During college is typically the time when most stu- lege students confessed to making mistakes with their
dents take their first key financial actions, including finances. Also, about one-third of responding first-
applying for loans, choosing among financial lenders, year students said that they were financially unpre-
understanding interest rates, budgeting for tuition and pared to manage their money at college. According to
living expenses, choosing whether to work and how Angela Lyons in 2004, low-income students are even
much money to save, and whether to acquire a credit more at risk to drop out for financial reasons because
card. In some academic disciplines such as economics they have no safety net. And as William Tierney, Zoë
and business and some cocurricular experiences such Corwin, and Julia Colyar discuss in Preparation for Col-
as entrepreneurship clubs, higher education has taken lege, low-income students typically grow up having
a role in financial literacy. But delivery of this educa- less access to financial knowledge than their higher-
tion is uneven and unsystematic. We believe that stu- income peers. Financial education may help some of
dents like James can benefit from receiving education these students better manage their money, provide
about personal finances through a first-year seminar, them with important financial tools, and help them
a money management office, or workshops offered stay in college.
through a financial aid office. If one accepts that financial education can be a
While many educators may believe that colleges key component of learning in college and that stu-
already address financial literacy or that students learn dents who possess practical competence in personal
about these issues at home or in high school, the evi- finance are more confident and academically success-
dence is overwhelming that most college students ful, what kind of financial education is available to
are financially illiterate and continue to score low on them? How is it offered, and is it provided to at-
financial literacy surveys. For example, Haiyang Chen risk populations, particularly those from low-income
and Ronald Volpe tested 924 students from fourteen backgrounds?
college campuses across the nation on financial literacy In the remainder of this article, we explore
and only 53 percent answered the questions correctly. current financial education practices on college
The survey explored topics such as saving, borrow- campuses, make recommendations to educators on
ing, investing, and insurance. When presented with developing financial education on their own campus,
hypothetical scenarios, the least knowledgeable college and conclude with a review of best practices in finan-
students made incorrect decisions. The authors hypoth- cial education.
esize that college students who did not do well on this
test will most likely make similar mistakes in their daily
lives. More recently, Brenda Cude, Frances Lawrence, Adrianna Kezar is an associate professor at the University of
Angela Lyons, Kaci Metzger, Emily LeJeune, Loren Southern California and associate director for the Center for
Marks, and Krisanna Machtmes used quantitative and Higher Education Policy Analysis. Her research specializes in
qualitative methods to assess the financial management diverse students, faculty and staff, leadership, governance, and
organizational issues on college campuses.
skills of college students. They confirmed the finding
that college students are not managing their finances Hannah Yang is a research associate at the University of
well and recommended that college campuses address Southern California with the Center for Higher Education
Policy Analysis. She has worked in academic advis-
student deficits in this area. ing and received her Masters in Education specializing
As well as being an intellectual competency, in postsecondary education and student affairs from the
financial literacy can increase the odds that students Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern
will stay—and succeed—in college. A 2007 study at California.
Buffalo State College found that college students have
an average of $1,000 in credit card debt. A 2006 study We love feedback. Send letters to executive editor Jean M.
commissioned by KeyBank and conducted by Har- Henscheid ([email protected]), and please copy
ris Interactive found that 75 percent of first-year col- her on notes to authors.
16
ABOUT CAMPUS / JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2010
C URRENT P RACTICES use a locally developed curriculum to provide most
IN F INANCIAL E DUCATION
of the financial education in TRIO programs. They
deliver the financial education in an in-person group
18
ABOUT CAMPUS / JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2010
“Get Financially Fit: A Financial Education Toolkit for about/press_release/rs_press_release/061120_gl_uw_
College Campuses,” available at http://www.newy- financial_education_report.html).
orkfed.org/regional/Fin%20Ed%20Toolkit%20for%20 Cocurriculum. Some campuses incorporate
College%20Campuses.pdf. This tool provides easily financial education in their cocurriculum by including
accessible information on building a successful finan- it in first-year student orientation or as a workshop in
cial education program, from choosing an appropriate residence halls, a women’s resource center, or student
type of program to marketing the program effectively. support services. For example, the Office of Student
It also provides institutions with important financial Services at Boston College created Successful Start,
education topics to include in their program. The tool a financial literacy program that offers workshops on
provides models and best practices of programs to help all aspects of financial management (see http://www.
team members begin their discussion. bc.edu/offices/stserv/meta-elements/pdf/brochure.
In this section, we highlight some considerations pdf). Most colleges and universities that incorporate
for financial education programs in the curriculum, the financial education in freshman orientation offer it as a
cocurriculum, student services, and staff and faculty stand-alone session. Some institutions have campus fac-
development services. ulty or staff with a background in finance facilitate the
Curriculum. In its 2008 Annual Report to the workshop. Others invite off-campus financial experts
President, the President’s Advisory Council on Finan- from local banks or private companies to speak to stu-
cial Literacy recommended that the U.S. Depart- dents and parents about a financial topic—for example,
ment of the Treasury and the U.S. Department of budgeting for the first year in college.
Education work together to require a university or Services. To incorporate financial education into
college course in financial literacy. Although inte- campus services, an institution might involve the finan-
grating financial education into a curriculum may cial aid office, the on-campus credit union or bank,
seem daunting, the potential payoff is great because or the academic advising office in offering financial
financial education would allow students to apply education to students. Financial education can include
their learning and change their behaviors early in brochures, online resources, workshops, and expert
their financial life. Institutions could start small by speakers. For example, Brigham Young University
offering a financial education element in their first- (BYU) created Financial Path to Graduation, an online
year experience course and then take on larger tasks tool to help students calculate how much they expect
like offering financial education as an option in gen- to make in the future and, given this information, what
eral education requirements or integrating the intel- debt burden seems safe to assume. While this software
lectual competency of financial literacy into existing is not available to the public, other campuses that are
courses. The University of Wisconsin–Madison and considering creating a similar program can view the
Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corporation BYU model at http://saas.byu.edu/depts/finaid/docu-
developed a three-credit-hour financial education ments/fp2g.pdf. For more examples of online financial
class and pilot-tested it during the spring semester education programs, see the University of South-
of 2006. According to the programs’ assessments, ern California’s financial education resources list at
students exhibited a marked and sustained improve- http://www.usc.edu/dept/chepa/IDApays/resources/
ment in two cash management behaviors: creating financial_resources.pdf.
a budget and keeping a spending diary. Budgeting Faculty and Staff Development. A campus-
and tracking spending require students to do more wide financial education team can also help develop
long-range thinking and reflection about their activi- and deliver training for staff and faculty in order to
ties, which enhances critical thinking and judgment. give them the necessary resources to incorporate
The curriculum has been made available for use financial education into the curriculum, cocurriculum,
by other educational institutions in various formats and services of their institution. Professional develop-
(see https://www.mygreatlakes.org/about/content/ ment may also involve presentations on the various
21
ABOUT CAMPUS / JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2010
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999. All rights reserved.
Here's How To Use The News
And Tune Out The Noise
By Jason Zweig
Money, 27 no7 63-4, July 1998
I hate to seem as if I'm raining on my own parade, but recent events have me wondering: Is there
such a thing as paying too much attention to the financial press? Are investors today better informed
than they used to be--or have they become too well informed?
Last December, Warner-Lambert stock lost 18.5% of its value, or $7 billion, in a single day when a
British company said it would stop selling a Warner-Lambert diabetes treatment. But over the next
three months, Warner-Lambert sold $138 million worth of that drug--plus $1 billion worth of others--
and the stock gained a third, outperforming the market by nearly three to one.
In May, the stock of Entremed, an obscure biotech company, shot from $12 to $85 in a day when
the New York Times reported that two of the firm's drugs showed promise as cancer cures. Fidelity
Select Biotechnology, a fund that specializes in similar stocks--but didn't hold Entremed--jumped 1%
that day as its holdings rose in sympathy. Then the reality sank in that the drugs have worked only on
mice; the stock shrank back below $30, and the Fidelity fund lost value for the week. Only a few days
after it broke the front-page news, the New York Times ran two articles scolding investors for not
realizing that Entremed's prospects were not that bright after all.
In both cases, traders who acted on the first burst of news ended up kicking themselves. Why?
Because these days, news reaches everyone so swiftly that it's almost impossible to beat the
stampede. It wasn't always this way.
Back in 1790, as soon as Alexander Hamilton released his plan to reorganize U.S. debt, crafty bond
speculators sailed south from New York in sleek ships that outraced the good news on land. Those
speculators snapped up bonds from uninformed small investors at 20{cents} to 25{cents} on the
dollar, and within days, they were able to double their money. Likewise, in 1815 financier N.M.
Rothschild made a fortune buying English bonds after his elite private couriers slipped him the first
word that the British had defeated Napoleon at Waterloo.
In Hamilton's and Rothschild's time, news took days to travel from Paris to London or New York to
Philadelphia, giving clever investors a chance to get the word and act on it before anyone else. But
today, over the Internet and CNBC, news flits from Jakarta to Chicago in nanoseconds--and
professional and amateur investors alike can follow every twitch in a stock as closely and easily as
intensive-care doctors monitor changes in a patient's pulse.
Mind you, it's still possible to get wind of big news before most people do. This May, the Internet
chat rooms were rife with rumors that Tyco International was about to acquire U.S. Surgical. If you'd
pounced on U.S. Surgical when the rumors first surfaced, you could--in theory--have earned more than
25% in just 12 trading days.
But in truth, investing is rarely that easy: First, the Tyco rumor was fueled by what appears to be
inside information--not the kind of thing you often can get hold of legally. Second, for every online
rumor that turns out to be true, there are scads of them that turn out to be false. Datek, the Internet
brokerage firm, says in its ads: "Big newsnity. Points 779 brobe bromade in a
the financial media tend to isolate recent changes, rather than put them in context. In fact, the flow of
the news makes trends seem likely to persist just when they are most likely to reverse. Think, for
example, of the glowing media coverage that Iomega, Oxford Health and Cendant got as their stocks
were shooting almost straight up--and how, once the stocks stumbled, nobody in the press could find
anything good to say about them anymore. Or consider fund managers Gary Pilgrim of PBHG and
Garrett Van Wagoner of the Van Wagoner funds: After huge gains in 1995 and early 1996, they were
written up as if they could walk on water wearing lead boots. Now the media often treat Pilgrim and
Van Wagoner as if they're simply all wet.
That's because reporters, like most humans, fall into the trap of assuming that we can predict future
results by analyzing recent patterns. Thus we tend to reinforce the notion that "when you're hot, you're
hot--and when you're not, you're not." Unfortunately, a stock is no more certain to keep rising just
because it has been going up lately, nor is a mutual fund more likely to beat the market this year
because it did so the past few years. In fact, finance professors have amassed overwhelming evidence
proving the opposite.
Also, the press usually focuses on the numerical amount of a price change, rather than on its value
in percentage terms (which is what really matters). Thus a TV reporter may exclaim: "The market is
dropping--the Dow is down 100 points!" even though, at the recent 9000 level of the Dow Jones
industrial average, that's barely a 1% drop.
Now think how odd it would sound if the weatherman on the same TV station hollered, "It's getting
colder--the temperature has fallen from 91{degrees} to 90{degrees}!" That too is roughly a 1% drop.
When we watch the market, much of what seems like news turns out to be nothing more than noise.
A year ago the press was nearly unanimous in declaring Southeast Asia to be one of the world's best
long-term investments; next, when the Asian Tiger markets collapsed last fall, you were advised to bail
out; then, when those markets bounced up early this year, the coverage waxed bullish again; and now,
with Asia in retreat, the news is back to bearish. Trying to follow all this is enough to give you whiplash-
-and to distract you from the key question: If Asia was a good long-term investment a year ago, isn't it
an even better value today at half the price?
Listen to Charles Ellis of Greenwich Associates, the distinguished investment management
consultant: "The typical stock price changes by at least 4% between its high and low each day. Since
there are roughly 250 trading days per year, that implies a total price change of 1,000% per year. But
the price of most stocks actually changes less than 15% per year on average, which means that more
than 98% of all the movement is just flutter, or noise."
So how can you tune out the noise?
Stop checking your watch. Many people would panic if they did not know, day by day or even
moment to moment, the exact prices of their investments. This impulse is understandable: It's your
money. But the more you check your investments, the more they'll seem to bounce up and down.
By contrast, you probably don't check the value of your biggest investment, your house, on a daily or
weekly basis. Does that prevent your house from rising in value over time? Does it make you a poorly
informed real estate investor? Of course not. And you should think of your portfolio the same way.
Personally, I check my mutual funds four times a year--no more, and no less.
How much trouble can you get into by obsessing over short-term price changes? Plenty. Recent
research by a team of economists and psychologists compared allocations between one stock fund
and one bond fund among two groups of investors: those who evaluate their portfolios monthly and
those who look at their accounts once a year. The monthly group watched the stock fund heave up
and down 12 times, while the yearly group saw it change only once, at year-end.
The monthly group, fixating on the interim volatility of the stock fund, moved money into the lower-
earning bond fund; the yearly group stuck with the stock fund, ending up with twice as much money in
equities. "The {investors} with the most data did the worst in terms of money earned," wrote
researchers Richard Thaler, Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman and Alan Schwartz in the Quarterly
Journal of Economics last year. The lesson: Stop checking your watch so often.
Investing is a marathon, not a sprint. Entremed, that little biotech company with the promising
cancer cure, may well be the next Pfizer. But history shows that the company that comes up with a
breakthrough is not always the one that profits. After all, the fax machine was pioneered by Western
Union, commercial air travel by Pan Am, the VCR by Ampex and the personal computer by Commodore.
31
All of these innovative firms lost out to the copycat companies that followed them. That's why you
should never rush to buy a stock "on the news"; if the breakthrough is that great, the company has
years of growth to come, and you can take your time evaluating it. And that's where the press can
come in handy.
Finally, remember the difference between the weather and the climate. On any given day, it can be
warm and sunny or dark and rainy. But in the long run, the climate is more predictable. Investing is like
that too: Just as June tends to be warmer than January and August sunnier than April, over longer
periods investment fluctuations smooth themselves into more foreseeable patterns. Although the
market news can be alarming on any day--or, as in the 1970s, awful for several years--over time it will
turn more comforting as the value of your investments grows.
32
A Catechism of Economic Cliches
By Rob Norton and Trishia Welsh
Fortune, January 13 1997, Vol. 135, Issue 1
Make no mistake: When Journalists pen screeds about markets and the economy, trite phrases
abound
We process a lot of financial and economic journalism here at FORTUNE. For starters, there's the
stuff we write--page after page of it. Then there's the stuff we read: cubic yard upon cubic yard, arriving
around the clock via E-mail, snail mail, and all modes in between. As we look back on each year's
worth, a question suggests itself. Are there as many cliches in business journalism as we suspect? The
answer: There are cliches aplenty. To wit:
How many economists agree with the journalist? Most economists.
What kind of economists agree with the journalist? Mainstream economists.
What words often precede a journalist's main thesis? "No one is suggesting that..."
What kind of men decline to be interviewed? Deeply private men.
Who will be affected by our failure to address whatever looming fiscal crisis is being written about?
Our children and our children's children.
How do companies get higher returns? Companies rack up higher returns.
How do they get money? They rake in money.
Into what do they rake it? Into their coffers.
How do companies spend money? They shell it out, fork it over, or pony it up.
How do companies prepare for increased sales? They ramp up for increased sales.
How do sales decrease? Sales slump.
What kind of returns get written about? Eye-popping returns.
What kind of returns do good companies earn? Fat returns.
What kind of returns do bad companies earn? They earn pitiful returns.
What kind of moves do newsworthy companies make? Stunning moves.
What kind of wrinkles do journalists like best? New wrinkles.
How are agreements made? Agreements are struck or hammered out.
What about strategies? Strategies are mapped out.
What kind of tech stocks get written about? Highflying tech stocks.
Who are the most admirable investors? Sharp-eyed investors.
What do sharp-eyed investors do? Sharp-eyed investors clean up.
What kind of investors sell their stocks? Skittish investors.
What kind of spirits do investors possess? Animal spirits.
What wagon do investors climb onto? The bandwagon.
What kind of ride does the market take? A wild ride.
What kind of declines happen to markets? Steep declines.
Into what kind of funk does the market fall? Into a deep funk.
What's wrong with consumers? Consumers are strapped.
How do prices increase? Prices soar.
How else? They skyrocket.
How do they decrease? They plummet.
How else? They nose-dive.
Where is inflation these days? Inflation is nowhere to be seen.
Where is the Fed? The Fed is on hold.
Between which two hazards must the Federal Reserve chairman steer the ship of monetary policy?
Between the Scylla of inflation and the Charybdis of recession.
Will FORTUNE writers in general, or this writer in particular, use any of these cliches in the coming
year? To be sure.
33
Media History, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003
On Wednesdays the thoughts of Daily Mirror readers turn to money. A weekly feature,
‘Mirror Money’, sometimes running to eight pages, sits at the very heart of the
newspaper. It exhibits the key characteristics of contemporary popular financial journal-
ism. The edition published on 26 January 2000 was fairly typical. John Husband, the
Mirror’s City editor, was identified at the top of the first page of what was, in effect, a
weekly financial supplement. ‘HERE’S TO A BONNY Y2K’ ran the headline over his
by-lined article, alongside an appealing colour photograph of a baby. The approach was
brisk and businesslike: ‘Let’s kick off with our nine-point plan to get your finances in
order.’ Stories were heavily personalized. Another article by Husband in the same issue,
designed to alert readers to the advantages of the tax-free Individual Savings Account
(ISA), featured Maureen Millward, 24, from Bolton, a recently promoted process analyst
working for Kelloggs, who had ‘stepped up her savings with a shares ISA’. There was
also a celebrity angle supplied by Andy Robinson, former England rugby international,
who had done rather well with an ISA managed by Jupiter. A nice balance was struck
between championing the interests of Mirror readers and alerting them to investment
opportunities. ‘Our campaign to ban endowment mortgages is gathering pace’, it was
claimed, on reports that Lloyds TSB, NatWest and Barclays were dropping this
controversial financial product. Elsewhere a stockbroker, Justin Urquhart Stewart,
advised readers to buy shares in Kingfisher, the UK’s largest non-food retailer. Three
years later, despite the dramatic transformation in the investment climate since 2000, the
‘Mirror Money’ formula remains largely unchanged.
But the Mirror’s financial coverage at the millennium was not confined to Wednes-
day’s centre pages. Apart from intermittent stories supplied by Husband and others for
the news columns, the paper offered a page of City news and comment each day. From
May 1998 to February 2000, when it was replaced by the relatively sober ‘Financial
Mirror’, this was the domain of the ‘City Slickers’, Anil Bhoyrul and James Hipwell, the
latter pictured replete with red braces, who relayed share tips and insider gossip, urging
Mirror readers to ‘pile in’. A short item published on 7 April 1999 is indicative of their
style.
Slicker hears that Monument Oil & Gas could soon be taken over … Our
friends in the City think so too, and have pushed up the shares 5p to 47p. It’s
not too late to get in—they could go to 60p soon.
The implications were clear: Bhoyrul and Hipwell were on familiar terms with insiders,
with people who counted. As far as stocks and shares were concerned they were ‘in the
know’ and well placed to supply readers with information that would enable them to give
ISSN 1368-8804 print/ISSN 1469-9729 online/03/020137-16 © 2003 Taylor & Francis Ltd
DOI: 10.1080/1368880032000105906
138 D. Porter
the City gents a run for their money. On 11 February 2000, with the techMARK-100
index reaching heights that conventional market wisdom suggested could not be long
sustained, the Slickers reflected in characteristically gung-ho fashion on their ability to
pick winners in the new technology sector.
SLICKERS SAY: We’ve been banging on about these companies for 18
months and anyone who has followed our advice has done very well—despite
what the moronic Sun and newspaper for bores, The Guardian, say.
Anticipating the downward adjustment that was to take place shortly afterwards they
continued to exude confidence, predicting that any correction would be ‘a minor blip not
a market crash’. In the very short term, as indicated in an earlier version of this article,
written in July 2000, this proved correct, though any reader holding on to shares bought
on their advice at the height of the dot.com boom would since have had good cause to
question their judgement [1]. It soon became clear, however, that there were other causes
for concern relating to the Mirror’s City Slickers. The most important of these was their
apparent disregard for those provisions of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC)
Code of Practice that were designed ‘to ensure that readers receive disinterested advice
and information and that (financial) journalists and those connected with them do not
profit as a result of publication’ [2].
The Mirror’s financial coverage thus stood at a point where old-style City journalism,
first featured during the nineteenth century as a daily ‘money article’ written by a
specialist ‘City editor’, merged with the tradition of popular journalism derived from
Alfred Harmsworth’s Daily Mail of 1896. The intention here is to set ‘Mirror Money’
and ‘City Slickers’ in this wider historical context. At the same time the burden of
responsibility falling on the shoulders of journalists who write about money for a
relatively unsophisticated audience will be explored. Financial journalists, as any reading
of the Mirror confirms, do not merely report and comment; they also advise people on
what to do with their money. This brings expert journalists and inexpert readers into a
special relationship which, as far as the Mirror is concerned, had been developing since
Derek Dale became its first post-war City editor in March 1960. Dale’s brief was ‘to give
guidance’ and ‘to translate the jargon of the City into language that all will understand’
(4 March 1960). His successors, Robert Head and John Husband, appeared to take the
same view of the City editor’s role. In the late 1990s, ‘City Slickers’, the Mirror’s first
venture into what has been called the ‘fill your boots’ style of financial journalism,
seemed to break with this combination of accessibility and prudence. After he had been
dismissed in February 2000, Bhoyrul recalled that when he and Hipwell had first joined
the Mirror, the editor, Piers Morgan, ‘told us the opportunity was there to reinvent
business journalism and I think we did that’ [3]. The outcome of a subsequent PCC
adjudication, indicating a number of instances in which its code had been breached,
suggested that this reinvention, if that is what it was, was highly problematic. A
preliminary assessment of the Slickers and their niche in the history of the popular press
seems justified.
aware of an ethical dimension to their work [10]. The journalist determined ‘to write his
own book’, seeking to inflate the price of shares he wanted to sell or to deflate the price
of shares he wanted to buy, remained something of a problem. A growing sense of
professionalism, however, appears to have kept this tendency in check and over the
course of the twentieth century readers came to trust the integrity of the experts who
brought them news from the City or advised on finance generally. The financial
journalist, as Paul Bareau, then editor of the Statist, observed in the 1960s, was ‘always
in a position in which he could profit by speculative operations based on the views he
expounds’. From time to time some had failed to maintain the required standard of
integrity; ‘they have been the very rare exception’ [11].
The New Financial Journalism, progressively adapted to fit in with changes in the
layout and house-style of the more popular dailies, shaped the development of financial
journalism at this level through to the late 1950s. Middle-market titles, like the Mail, the
Express and the News Chronicle, with a significantly higher proportion of small investors
in stock market securities among their readers than the Mirror and the Sketch, gave City
editors more scope to be innovative in terms of style and presentation. By the end of the
1930s headlines had become more arresting, economic analysis more accessible, market
reporting more concise and share tipping more blatant and ubiquitous. As the convention
of anonymity was progressively abandoned a City editor, like Oscar Hobson at the News
Chronicle, could become a newspaper personality in his own right, developing a
distinctive style and rhetoric. Financial journalism was less important in the more
downmarket titles and it changed more slowly. Typically, in the Daily Mirror of the late
1930s, a six-paragraph article by ‘Our City Editor’ would appear at page 24 or
thereabouts along with a selection of Stock Exchange closing prices. This would take up
less than half the space on a page that was often shared with racing news and selections
supplied by ‘Bouverie’, the paper’s resident tipster. The uneven distribution of personal
wealth among the readerships of the various newspapers probably constrained the
development of the Mirror’s money article in this period. Its City coverage was one of
the first casualties of war in 1939. In a newspaper bought by countless small savers but
few small investors this was only to be expected. As war transformed news values
virtually overnight it was enough to advise readers facing an uncertain future: ‘LOOK
AFTER YOUR SAVINGS BOOKS’ (6 September 1939).
‘Keeping Up with the Joneses’: post-war affluence and the money page
The apocryphal 1930s story about the clerk on a weekly wage of £5 retiring with £5000
in the bank is relevant here. His enviable position could be accounted for, it seemed, by
a lifetime of thrift and sobriety and his wife’s prudent housekeeping. And, oh yes, … an
aunt had died recently and left him £4957 [12]. The chances of a clerk or a manual
worker amassing a significant lump sum for investment were slim. Even though average
real incomes were rising in the inter-war period there was often little to fall back on
when the proverbial rainy day arrived. By 1960, when the Daily Mirror resurrected
regular and systematic coverage of City affairs for the first time since 1939, 15 years of
full employment and rising real incomes had transformed this situation. This had fuelled
an unprecedented boom in consumption in the late 1950s as goods once categorized as
luxuries—cars, televisions, refrigerators and washing machines—became more afford-
able. As a recent historian of consumption has observed: ‘In the long haul from poverty
to affluence, this was the great leap forward’ [13]. Financial institutions, with unit trusts
like M&G and Save and Prosper to the fore, competed vigorously to attract the attention
‘City Slickers’ in Perspective 141
and savings of the newly affluent worker. The expansion of financial product advertising
in the press created a greater incentive for newspapers to address readers as potential
investors. In this new climate popular financial journalism ‘provided a sympathetic
editorial background to the financial institutions’ campaigns to tap the growing savings
of the nation’ [14].
Adjustment to the new conditions of affluence was easier for newspapers that leaned
politically to the right. But the left-of-centre Mirror, selling around 4.5 million copies
each day, was the UK’s largest circulation newspaper by a considerable margin and
especially well placed to assist financial institutions anxious to establish market share
among working-class savers. The absence of City coverage after 1945 suggested editorial
acquiescence in the notion that stocks and shares were not for the likes of those that read
the Mirror. ‘IF I HAD A FORTUNE’, a feature based on readers’ letters in 1950, was
indicative.
Thirty thousand pounds! (wrote Mrs B. of Wealdstone) I should be scared stiff
if I had half that. I don’t think I could sleep or eat. What a worry! No, just give
me father’s fiver on Fridays as always and I’ll be satisfied. [15]
But, by the end of the 1950s, even the Labour Party was beginning to recognize that
something had changed. ‘Daily newspapers’, noted the Labour Research Department in
1959, ‘devote considerable space to news from the City and recently there has been a
lot of talk about “encouraging the small investor” and “creating a shareholder’s
democracy”’ [16]. The Mirror, competing daily for circulation and advertising revenue
with newspapers that were already cultivating the small shareholder, did not simply
acknowledge the significant socio-economic shift that had occurred; it embraced it with
enthusiasm. On 4 March 1960 the decision to appoint Derek Dale as City editor to write
every Wednesday about stocks and shares was explained thus:
The Mirror recognises that there has been a revolution in the savings habits of
Britain. No longer is The City the exclusive domain of Big Money.
Press commentators were quick to recognize the significance of the Mirror’s new
commitment to financial journalism. Granada’s influential What the Papers Say, accord-
ing to a report in the Mirror, attributed it to ‘the evidence that more and more people,
many of them factory workers and clerks, are buying stocks and shares’ (11 March
1960). Perhaps the most novel aspect of the Mirror’s coverage was the use of a strip
cartoon, ‘Keeping Up with the Joneses’, featuring a married couple, ‘Joe and Prudence
Hope’, and their self-appointed financial adviser, ‘Uncle Forsyte’. Its first appearance so
soon after the departure of the scantily attired ‘Jane’, so popular with the Mirror’s
readers in the armed forces during the Second World War, seemed to suggest the passing
of an era. The coincidence, according to Paul Bareau, was ‘highly significant given the
faithful reflection of popular taste which that newspaper provides’ [17].
Dale’s weekly feature, simply headed ‘Stocks and Shares’, spread over three or four
columns in the Mirror’s centre pages. Readers were drawn in by a headline leading them
into Dale’s opening paragraph. This often consisted of advice for the inexperienced or
nervous small investor delivered in plain words and short sentences. News that a falling
stock market had prompted some small investors to cash in prompted the headline ‘MY
ADVICE TO UNIT-TRUSTERS—DON’T SELL’, and a string of supporting points. ‘Far
from thinking of selling, the sensible unit trust investor should be BUYING at the
present moment’ (11 May 1960). Company news, wherever possible, had a human-
interest angle. A story offering readers ‘A PEEP INSIDE BOSSES’ PAY PACKETS’
focused on Frederick Donner, chair of General Motors (owners of Vauxhall), whose
142 D. Porter
salary, calculated at £3800 a week, was 5 times more than President Eisenhower’s and
20 times more than Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s. It was a mark of Dale’s
confidence in the moderation of the newly affluent British worker that he felt able to
advance a case for reducing taxes on high earnings in order to retain the services of ‘the
men who make British industry tick’. Acknowledging that ‘the chap earning £8 a week
won’t have much sympathy for the “plight” of a top director earning £8,000’ he argued,
nevertheless, that ‘it is the workers who suffer if inferior men are making decisions at
the top’ (25 May 1960). Some £8-a-week Mirror readers might have allowed themselves
to be distracted at this point by the large photograph of pop star Adam Faith’s first screen
kiss on the adjacent page.
Dale did not ‘talk down’ to his readers but he sensed that many of them required some
fairly basic information. An article headed ‘HOW TO SHOP FOR YOUR SHARES’
explained how the Stock Exchange worked and advised readers who had not bought
shares before on how to get in touch with a stockbroker (18 May 1960). A particular
strength of Dale’s journalism was his ability to make links between the remote science
of investment and the everyday experience of Mirror readers. His very first article
incorporated an item headed ‘Nothing Like a Cuppa’ recommending Brooke Bond shares
at 15 shillings as ‘a first class investment for the man, or woman, prepared to buy—and
hold’ (9 March 1960).
Here goes your first lesson in investment.
DON’T TRY TO BE TOO CLEVER.
There is always a profit to be made from the thing that is fundamental.
And there is nothing more basic to the national character than—a ‘cuppa’.
A few weeks later the thought that many readers had spent Easter Monday ‘getting
stuck in to the back lawn with a mower’ prompted a plug for Qualcast.
The Englishman’s pride is his lawn … The average life of a lawn-mower is ten
years. Five million lawns—a new mower every ten years—that means a market
for 500,000 lawn-mowers a year.
And the biggest part of that business goes to Qualcast of Derby—the largest
manufacturer of lawn-mowers in the world …
It was important to demystify finance, to convince Mirror readers, male and female,
that the City was for them. An item in the same edition on the Thomas Tilling Group,
makers of Pyrex and Pretty Polly nylons, pointed out that it had more women than men
shareholders. ‘Women are shrewd investors and I endorse their faith in the Tilling
company’ (20 April 1960).
The Mirror went to some lengths to promote an active two-way relationship between
its City editor and his readers. Part of Dale’s article each week, ‘You Ask’, was devoted
to answering queries. Simultaneously the Mirror established an Advice Bureau: ‘What-
ever the amount—whatever the problem—we will do our best to help you.’ Readers
were assured that experts would answer letters ‘in language you can understand’ (16
March 1960). By 1968 the bureau was dealing with almost 25,000 letters a year [18].
There was a link here with mainstream financial journalism where it was a long-
established tradition for City editors to give investment advice to individual readers. The
Financial News of the 1880s found space daily to publish ‘Answers to Correspondents’
and had invited readers who sought a personal reply from the editor to apply enclosing
a postal order for 2s. 6d. Though some published queries were undoubtedly spurious and
the advice given not always disinterested the idea caught on; both the Mail and the
‘City Slickers’ in Perspective 143
Express at the turn of the century had encouraged readers to write to the City editor. The
free service offered by the Mirror after 1960 helped to keep successive City editors and
their staff in touch with the everyday concerns of readers in so far as they related to
money. Financial journalism in the Mirror has been shaped by a sharp awareness of the
particular concerns and interests of its predominantly working-class readership. ‘The
Daily Mirror’, it was noted in a review of financial journalism in the 1960s, ‘remember-
ing its sense of responsibility to the masses, is rather reminiscent of Dorothy Dix and
those other columnists famous for emotional problems’. Not only was news and advice
conveyed in simple language, there was also ‘a strong sense of guardianship of the
purses of the readers’ [19].
By the 1970s the emphasis was changing. ‘Your Money’ now often appeared more
than once a week and its focus began to shift from the City to more mundane
preoccupations. At the start of the decade City news predominated; it was very much the
first duty of the City editor to explain ‘How Prices are Moving’ and to offer some
explanation for the state of the market. ‘Shares started the week with a bang … mainly
because an outfit called the National Institute of Economic and Social Research has
called on the Government to pump some more inflation back into the economy’ (3 March
1970). Some traces of the speculative fever of the late 1960s survived but Head was not
slow to remind readers that City punters who chose to ride on the back of the Australian
nickel boom that it would eventually collapse. Shares in Tasminex, ‘which boomed to
£45 a month ago when workmen digging a cellar nearby claimed to have found nickel
were looking very tarnished yesterday’ (4 March 1970). With the company’s shares then
standing at just over £3 it seemed that little had changed since the late nineteenth century
when the City’s definition of a gold mine had been ‘a hole in the ground owned by a
liar’.
After the watershed year of 1973, when an economy already overheating as a result
of Anthony Barber’s expansionist budget of 1971 was subjected to the massive external
shock of rising oil prices, there was a change of tone. With inflation running at 25% by
the end of 1975 and the IMF knocking at the door the Mirror’s financial coverage
reflected the prevailing gloom. ‘Your Money’ was now set in a broader editorial context
where features on the stretched budgets of working-class families were commonplace.
‘YOUR SHRINKING POUND’ (10 March 1975), focusing on the Attewell family from
Barking, was fairly typical.
On paper, the Attewell family are better off than a year ago. Their income has
gone up by more than their household expenses.
That is in line with Government figures which show average earnings up 29
per cent and the cost of living up by just 20 per cent.
But statistics seldom tell the full story …
The full story was that Barry’s overtime had been cut, thus the Attewells ‘had to make
changes in their lifestyle—just to keep pace with inflation’. With unemployment levels
reaching over 1 million for the first time in the post-war era the activities of movers and
shakers in the golden square mile probably seemed increasingly remote and irrelevant as
far as many Mirror readers were concerned. Some contemporary observers perceived a
gaping chasm that would have made life especially difficult for the City editor of a
popular left-of-centre tabloid. Unemployment touched 1 million in January 1972, the first
time it had reached that level in the post-war era. It seemed odd, when these figures were
announced, that the Financial Times ordinary share index should surge to 500, its highest
point for 3 years. ‘The otherwise arid statistics seemed to say a lot about how important
values within a capitalist society tend to diverge’ [20].
Though share prices collapsed for a time in the mid-1970s, those who had wealth were
still better placed to protect their capital than most Mirror readers. Inflation might have
been, as Home Secretary Roy Jenkins argued in 1975, ‘Britain’s greatest menace since
Hitler’ but it was not so bad if one could afford to invest in Krugerrands. These could
be stashed away in order to avoid Denis Healey’s projected Wealth Tax. Writing in
March 1975, Head reported ‘strong demand for gold coins’ along with the intelligence,
derived from the manufacturers, that ‘private people are buying more safes’. He assumed
that readers of ‘Your Money’, who had every reason to be concerned by the erosion of
their own small savings, would make the connection, especially when the interest on
‘City Slickers’ in Perspective 145
building society accounts was subject to a 7.5% ceiling (7 March 1975). In the meantime
the Dorothy Dix side of Mirror financial journalism came to the fore with an emphasis
on the advantages of inflation-proofed securities, like ‘Granny Bonds’, available to
old-age pensioners, and on explaining the real cost of personal loans touted by finance
companies. ‘Some people may be happy to borrow money at 42 per cent … But I still
urge you to think three times before doing so’ (4 March 1975). As economic policy
issues came to dominate the political agenda Head’s skill in exposition was often utilized
in general news coverage or special features. The complexities of Monetarist and
Keynesian economics were addressed in typically common-sense fashion with a glossary
designed to cut through the jargon. A recession was defined simply as ‘when you lose
your job’ (5 March 1980).
It was significant that the Mirror should look to Head to guide readers in this way.
By the 1980s a special report by the paper’s City editor carried real weight. It was not
simply that he possessed expertise in a specialist subject recognized as increasingly
important in terms of news value. What also counted was the City editor’s special
relationship with the paper’s readers. Financial journalists over the years have often
alluded to this relationship and to the burden that comes with it. For Kenneth Fleet, chief
City editor for Express newspapers, writing in 1983, the faith that readers invested in
Fleet Street’s leading financial writers was ‘remarkable’; it merited ‘a corresponding
responsibility and complete integrity’ [21]. In the context of popular financial journalism
building this relationship has involved empathizing with readers, developing a working
knowledge of their particular requirements and servicing them accordingly. Head,
interviewed in 1988, was strongly motivated by this aspect of his work, explaining that
he had once turned down a move to the Daily Telegraph on account of a phone call from
a Mirror reader in Bradford.
She had just inherited £2,000 and did not know what to do. She did not even
know the name of a bank, not even the Halifax Building Society. I couldn’t
believe it and I thought, bloody hell, if that’s the job that needs to be done,
then the hell with traditional City journalism, P/E ratios and tycoons. The lady
from Bradford is the reason I have stayed here so long. [22]
It is important to note that adult financial literacy, embracing ‘a working knowledge
of financial institutions, systems and services’, continues to give cause for concern.
According to Ron Sandler, former chief executive of Lloyds and author of a recent
government-sponsored report on the savings and investment industry, ‘the standards of
financial literacy in this country are woeful’ [23].
Some evidence is available that allows historians to explore the nature of this special
relationship. Letters from Mirror readers to Robert Head, along with copies of his
replies, have survived and are accessible to researchers. This collection, held at the
Mass-Observation Archive, covers only January–June 1981, but even a small sample of
the thousands of letters it contains is sufficient to illustrate the two-way relationship
between Head and his readers, the high regard in which he was held, and the care taken
to justify their trust in his judgement. Herein lies a fragmented but compelling picture
of the lives of working-class people in Britain on the edge of the great shake-out of
industrial labour that occurred in the 1980s, of people characterized by ‘an uneasy sense
that changes outside their personal world will not match the comforts within it’ [24].
Head found himself dealing with the queries of those already redundant and those made
anxious by the threat of redundancy, of the elderly widow wondering how best to cope
on her pension, of those with some savings who had been offered the chance to buy their
146 D. Porter
council house, and of parents anxious to put something away for their children. Their
personal worlds were some distance from the City but through Head, to whom they often
confided intimate details of their lives, it was possible to make a connection. Head’s
replies, and those of John Husband who assisted him, offered humane and practical
advice appropriate to the reader’s particular circumstances, dignifying their fears and
hopes through the application of expertise in finance. This evidence, in short, suggests
that the idea of a special relationship between the Mirror’s City editor and his readers
has real substance [25].
Online and telephone stockbroking operations cut the cost of access to a market where
highly fashionable dot.com stocks offered the prospect of quick and substantial profits.
These simultaneous developments appear to have attracted a new wave of small
investors while modifying, to some extent, the attitudes of the ‘Sids’, previously content
simply to hold their shares in privatized utilities or to sell them quickly for a windfall
profit, but now inclined to trade more actively. At the same time there was an expansion
in media activities related to financial services. ‘Everywhere you look’, noted Emily
Bell, business editor of the Observer, ‘there are new media aimed at this market, all
striving to capture the attention of Britain’s burgeoning share-trading community’ [31].
Having hosted a Channel Four series unblushingly entitled Dosh, Adam Faith went on
to launch the Money Channel in February 2000, available 24 hours a day to cable and
satellite television subscribers, its declared intention being ‘to demystify the subject for
the ordinary punter’ [32].
Throughout this period of social change the Mirror’s weekly money article maintained
its reputation for giving careful and prudent advice. ‘Your Money’ could hardly ignore
privatization and encouraged readers to buy shares on the favourable terms offered at
flotation. When the share price almost doubled on the first day of trading the Mirror
greeted the dawning age of the small shareholder with a smile: ‘TELECOMMANIA!
Investors ring up big profits’. Acknowledging that ‘owning shares means taking risks’,
Head continued:
The courage to take risks, however, is one of the things that could make Britain
great again.
I advised readers to buy Telecom shares. Now I tell you to hold on to them.
Over the years they’ll do you proud.
In tone and content ‘Your Money’ trod a fine line between enthusiasm and circum-
spection. A paragraph alerting readers to the forthcoming privatization of British
Airways was followed by another commenting favourably on new unit trusts available
from the Equitable, ‘Britain’s oldest life insurance company’, then considered to be one
of the safest places in which to invest regular savings. ‘If they are as good as their
Pelican Trust, which has more than quadrupled small investors’ money since it was
launched in 1969, the new ones will be worth backing’ (4 December 1984). For those
tempted to join the gold rush there were safer and more reliable vehicles than ordinary
shares.
This message was underlined when the stock market crashed in October 1987, an
event prompting the Mirror to give its City editor a full page to reassure small share
owners on the morning after ‘THE DAY THE CITY WENT BANG’. Head’s advice
maintained the steady line so evident in his replies to reader’s letters 6 years earlier.
There was no reason to panic, ‘most shares were still THREE times higher than they
were six years ago and TEN times up on the pit of 1974’. Further on in the same edition
‘Mirror Money’ was in characteristic form:
Too many people were lulled by the great Stock Exchange boom of the 1980s
into thinking that buying shares is a one way ticket or gravy train.
But as I’ve warned repeatedly, shares are a risk. And nobody should buy until
they’ve bought their own home, have loads of life insurance, a decent pension
plan and at least three month’s wages safely tucked away in a bank, building
society or National Savings.
The small features in that day’s ‘Mirror Money’ underlined the point—‘Make that
pension work’, ‘Get in on a council house deal’, ‘Trust in your units’ (21 October 1987).
148 D. Porter
Bhoyrul cheekily ‘expressed dismay’ when he was not listed amongst the UK’s 200
richest Asians (7 April 1999). The first ‘Slickers’ page of the new millennium was
perhaps the high point of its brief but spectacular career. Under the headline ‘SLICK-
ERS. . 159% SLACKERS. . 59%’ they awarded themselves ‘the silver medal’, claiming
that their 1999 share tips had outperformed all but those recommended by the Sunday
Times; ‘the bronze went to the Sunday Telegraph with a workmanlike 75 per cent gain’.
There was some fun to be had at the expense of their former employer, Sunday Business,
with a portfolio ‘made up of some of the worst dogs that have ever been allowed to bark
in the stock market’. Its 50,000 readers, they concluded, ‘would almost have been better
off getting burgled’. Underlining the message that the Slickers were on familiar terms
with people who counted, Alan Sugar and Richard Branson were congratulated on the
knighthoods they had been awarded in the New Year honours list. ‘What do we call you
guys now? Sir, Sir Al, Sir Dickie? Let us know mateys’ (5 January 2000).
The demise of ‘City Slickers’ in the Mirror a few weeks later and the decision to sack
Bhoyrul and Hipwell brought this episode in the history of financial journalism to a
dramatic conclusion. Stock Exchange surveillance appears to have prompted inquiries
into shares bought by Piers Morgan in Viglen plc, Sugar’s computer hardware company,
in January 2000. Though the Mirror’s editor subsequently denied that he had bought
Viglen knowing that Slickers were about to tip them for a rise and was cleared by an
internal inquiry he was sufficiently embarrassed by the allegations to sell the shares and
donate his profits to charity. This episode appears to have drawn attention to the Slickers
themselves and allegations regarding further breaches of the PCC Code of Practice. More
specifically, it was alleged that price-sensitive information had been passed on privately
in advance of publication to both Morgan and, on an earlier occasion, to Tina Weaver,
his deputy editor. A second set of allegations related to purchases of shares by Bhoyrul
and Hipwell just prior to the publication of favourable comment in ‘City Slickers’,
enabling them to profit from an upward movement in prices. If true, these represented
a further breach of the code which advised that it was inappropriate for financial
journalists to buy or sell shares or other securities ‘about which they have written
recently or about which they intend to write in the near future’ [35].
As rumours circulated, the Mirror was subjected to a barrage of embarrassing
publicity, much of it coming from its red-top rival, the Sun.
Tell your friends … tell your family. If you’re standing in the pub reading this
tell the bloke next to you: YOU CANNOT TRUST THE MIRROR.
They are a bunch of SPIVS.
The Mirror is a paper that rips its readers off by tipping stocks which have
already been bought by its staff.
David Yelland, the Sun’s editor, could not resist the opportunity to claim the moral
high ground: ‘Encouraging readers to buy low-worth shares at sky-high prices is robbing
them of hard-earned cash’ [36]. Morgan’s counter-attack, utilizing the front page to
accuse the Sun of ‘rank hypocrisy’, quickly ran out of steam (6 February 2000). ‘City
Slickers’ gave way albeit temporarily, to ‘Financial Mirror’, edited by Clinton Manning,
a safe pair of hands who was unlikely to trouble the PCC. The Mirror added an ironic
twist to its own tale of misfortune by publishing an article by Sir Alan Sugar, no less,
‘on why the crazy dot.com bonanza has to end soon’ (15 March 2000). By this time an
inquiry conducted by the paper’s owners, Trinity Mirror, had already concluded that
action was required and the company had revised its procedures to ensure compliance
with PCC guidelines. This was described in a statement issued later by the company as
150 D. Porter
a ‘rigorous internal regime relating to sharedealings which goes much further than the
Code of Practice’ [37]. As if to underline the point that a lesson had been learned the
Mirror’s daily City coverage was, within a few months of the Slickers’ demise, being
supplied by Suzy Jagger, the journalist who had first broken the story of Morgan’s
Viglen shares in the Daily Telegraph [38].
The PCC adjudication acknowledged the steps taken by Trinity Mirror to set its own
house in order. Morgan was found to have breached the code twice in relation to share
purchases, though only on a technicality in relation to his stake in Viglen; it was also
indicated that he had failed to exercise adequate supervision over ‘City Slickers’. There
was no finding against Weaver, though Bhoyrul and Hipwell were judged to have
departed from PCC guidelines when they had spoken to her about shares in Booth
Industries, tipped in July 1998. As to shares purchased by Bhoyrul and Hipwell
themselves and subsequently given favourable publicity in ‘City Slickers’, the PCC
concluded ‘that there were repeated and flagrant breaches of the Code’. This sorry saga
had cast a shadow over financial coverage in the Mirror, previously regarded as ‘an
operation of extreme probity’. Sought out by the Sun, a dismayed Robert Head had
commented: ‘When I was there the rule was that no one in the city office could buy, sell
or own shares’ [39].
Meanwhile Bhoyrul and Hipwell, parodied in Private Eye as ‘Anil Wind’ and,
inevitably, ‘James Tipwell’, had resurfaced in Mohamed Al Fayed’s Punch [40]. Their
‘City Slickers’ page, aimed at young, Internet-wise investors looking for a quick return
on glamorous high technology stocks, had sat uneasily with the more circumspect style
of popular financial journalism with which the Mirror had been associated for 40 years.
‘We had created a monster that was out of control’, Bohyrul subsequently admitted, in
a statement quoted in the PCC adjudication. On 1 December 1999 the Slickers, with
characteristic brass-neck, had commented in the Mirror on the shares of Pacific Media
in which dealing had been temporarily suspended.
We could give you a really technical explanation of why this happens but we
can’t be bothered—the bottom line is you’ll make loads of wonga. What the
hell more do you need to know?
A week later, on 8 December, ‘Money Mirror’ was congratulating itself for the part
it had played in saving the Leek United, a small building society, from ‘carpet-baggers’
and alerting Co-op customers to their £10.5 million Christmas dividend. Readers were
invited to draw the conclusion that ‘mutuality pays’. They had every reason to be
confused. In the end the Mirror could not have it both ways.
NOTES
* The author wishes to acknowledge the support of the Wincott Foundation for his research into the history
of financial journalism.
[1] See Dilwyn Porter, ‘Play it Safe or Think Big?: the Daily Mirror, its readers and their money,
1960–2000’, London School of Economics, Business History Unit, Occasional Paper, No. 1 (2000).
[2] http://www.pcc.org.uk/adjud/press/pr150402.htm, Press Complaints Commission (PCC), ‘The Mirror
Adjudication’ (15 March 2000).
[3] ‘We’re History’, Guardian (21 February 2000).
‘City Slickers’ in Perspective 151
[4] For popular financial journalism before 1960 see Dilwyn Porter, ‘Where There’s a Tip There’s a Tap:
the popular press and the investing public, 1900–60’, in Peter Catterall, Colin Seymour-Ure and Adrian
Smith, eds, Northcliffe’s Legacy: aspects of the British popular press, 1896–1996 (London: Macmillan,
2000), 71–96.
[5] Financial and Mining News (24 April 1884).
[6] Charles Duguid, How to Read the Money Article (London: Pitman & Sons, 1901), 2–3.
[7] Charles Duguid, ‘City Editing’, Sell’s Dictionary of the World’s Press and Advertiser’s Reference Book
(London: Sell and Co., 1903), 132–33.
[8] Daily Mail (4 May 1896).
[9] Karen Newman, Financial Marketing and Communications (Eastbourne: Holt, Reinhart & Winston,
1984), 62–64.
[10] See Dilwyn Porter, ‘City Editors and the Modern Investing Public: establishing the integrity of the new
financial journalism in late nineteenth-century London’, Media History, 4 (June 1998), 49–60.
[11] Paul Bareau, ‘Financial Journalism’, in Rodney Bennett-England, ed., Inside Journalism (London: Peter
Owen, 1967), 160.
[12] Tony Mason, ‘Hunger … is a Very Good Thing: Britain in the 1930s’, in Nick Tiratsoo, ed., From Blitz
to Blair: a new history of Britain since 1939 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997), 11–12.
[13] James Obelkevich, ‘Consumption’, in James Obelkevich and Peter Catterall, eds, Understanding
Post-war British Society (London: Routledge, 1994), 141.
[14] See Newman, Financial Marketing, 146–53, 185–93.
[15] Daily Mirror (10 January 1950). An Edinburgh reader, in the same edition, wrote that he would use his
hypothetical fortune to buy houses for ex-servicemen and their families ‘who, like mine, have been
compelled to live in one small room’.
[16] The Poor Man’s Guide to the Stock Exchange (London: Labour Research Department Publications,
1959), preface.
[17] Bareau, ‘Financial Journalism’, 153.
[18] Jeremy Tunstall, Newspaper Power: the new national press in Britain (Oxford: OUP, 1996), 359.
[19] Sheila Black, ‘In the City’, in Vernon Brodzsky, ed., Fleet Street: the inside story of journalism (London:
MacDonald & Co., 1966), 143.
[20] Richard Spiegelberg, The City: power without responsibility (London: Quartet Books, 1973), 1–2.
[21] Kenneth Fleet, The Influence of the Financial Press (London: Worshipful Company of Stationers and
Newspapermakers, 1983), 7.
[22] Mihir Bose, ‘Fallen Stars of the City Pages’, Business (March 1988).
[23] See Sandie Schagen and Anne Lines, Financial Literacy in Adult Life: a report to the NatWest Group
Charitable Trust (Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1996). For Sandler see ‘Ron’s
Going Back to School’, Guardian (15 March 2003).
[24] Philip Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall: Britain in the seventies (Michael Joseph/Channel 4, 1985),
413.
[25] Mass-Observation Archive (University of Sussex), Large Collections, Daily Mirror Letters, Financial and
Investment Advice (January–June 1981).
[26] Benjamin Calvert, The popular financial press, privatisation and popular capitalism in Britain during the
1980s, PhD thesis (Coventry, 2000), 211.
[27] Adam Faith, Acts of Faith: the autobiography (London: Bantam Press, 1996), 246–53. Faith later
operated as a financial consultant with a number of high-profile clients. When his business failed in the
late 1980s, Michael Winner, a dissatisfied client, commented ruefully that ‘Adam Faith is to financial
advice what Frank Bruno is to English literature’. See Faith’s obituary, The Times (10 March 2003).
[28] Neil Ascherson, Games with Shadows (London: Radius, 1988), 101–102.
[29] ‘Suddenly Britain has Become a Nation of Exuberant Shareholders’, Independent (11 December 1999).
[30] Calvert, The Popular Financial Press, 214.
[31] ‘Slickers Fuel the Casino Culture’, Observer (6 February 2000); for the new media see also ‘Take a
Tip—and steer clear of the wide boys’, Guardian (12 February 2000).
[32] ‘A Nice Little Earner’, The Express: get up and go! (February 2000). When the Money Channel folded
in May 2001 Faith was reported to have suffered a loss of £32 million. See The Times (10 March 2003).
[33] For the demise of the ‘Faith in a Million’ investment fund promoted by the Mail on Sunday see Faith,
252–53. Faith claims that ‘the boys in the City got cold feet’, causing the project to be abandoned 2 days
before it was due to be launched.
[34] For the ‘Romford Scholar’ see Ian Dury’s ‘Futures Song’ in Caryl Churchill, Serious Money (London:
Methuen, 1987), 61–62. ‘How hard I dredge to earn my wedge, I’m sharper than a knife …’
152 D. Porter
[35] For details of these allegations and the outcome of the PCC investigation see PCC, ‘Mirror Adjudication’.
[36] ‘Scandal that Taints Mirror’, Sun (5 February 2000). For an account of the tabloid war between the Sun
and the Mirror see ‘Are These the Most Deranged Men in Britain?’, Independent (9 February 2000); see
also ‘In the City’ and ‘Mirror Mirror on the Make’, Private Eye (11 February 2000).
[37] See ‘Morgan Stays Despite PCC Censure Over Share Dealing’, Press Gazette (12 May 2000).
[38] ‘Morgan to Offer Jagger Financial Mirror Editorship’, Press Gazette (2 June 2000).
[39] Tunstall, Newspaper Power, 359; for Head’s comments see ‘Mirror Editor’s Share Deal Raised in the
Commons’, Sun (3 February 2000).
[40] Private Eye (11 February 2000). For an update on Bhoyrul and Hipwell see ‘The Insiders’ Story’,
Guardian (26 July 2000).
Chapter Nine
Introduction
Economic globalization and market liberalization have challenged national
politics and political imaginaries during the last 20 years. With the rise of the
market liberalization and market-oriented policies the faith of the nation state
has become a matter of intense discussions (e.g. Hirst and Thompson, 1996;
Strange, 1996; Habermas, 1999; Hardt and Negri, 2000).
In the new globalized condition, states are seen as competing on the
‘hypermobile’ capital (Warf, 1999) and tackling the increasing power of the
multinational corporations as transnational multinationals and international
finance capital have become increasingly influential in politics (Schmidt, 1995;
Sklair, 2002). The state has been seen to evolve to a competition state (Cerny,
1990: 220–47) or an entrepreneurial state (Harvey, 1989: 178; Warf, 1999: 239),
which tries to appear as an appealing place for investments by lowering taxes,
providing cheap, flexible, or skilful labor, industrial sites or parks. The new global
condition for the state and national democracies has been labelled for instance as
flexible capitalism (Harvey, 1989, 2001), supermodernity (Auge, 1995) or
hyperglobalization (Hay, 2004: 520).
With regard to democracy, the greatest worry has perhaps been whether a
progressive separation of power from politics will take place (e.g. Bauman, 1999:
24–31, 120; Habermas, 1999). These worries have been enhanced by the problems
of politics and public communication (Blumler, 1995; Franklin, 2004; Louw, 2005).
These processes might mean that representative democracy and its institutions
are weakening. Or to be a little more cautious, at least it seems like the scope
and spaces of democratic politics and processes are currently under negotiation
due to the processes of globalization (e.g. McNair, 2000; Dahlgren, 2001).
The aim here is to examine the role of journalism in these processes. As it is
well known, journalism has a crucial role to play in modern mass democracies.
Journalism offers information on political issues, gives an opportunity to bring
up new political issues, creates opportunities for an ongoing dialogue and acts
as a watchdog of the decision-makers. Moreover journalism contains a view of
the world, a social cosmology or a political imaginary by which our societies and
life are imagined (Anderson, 1983; Gonzaléz-Veléz, 2002; Taylor, 2004: 50). As
Benedict Anderson (1983: 14–49) has pointed out, modern polities are to a
certain extent imagined communities. Polities and political life are maintained
192
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
through public arenas where the citizens of the polity do not actually meet, but
rather imagine themselves belonging to a common community. Journalism can
thus be understood as an imaginative exercise, which formulates social and
political imaginaries. Modern polities are imagined through the endless stream
of everyday journalistic texts; by the news, articles, columns, comments, and
leaders which describe, analyze, interpret, debate, and contest the political.
Historically, journalism has had a particularly central role in building up
national imaginaries by having tight connections with national imaginaries and
democracies. As the global economy has been liberalized and the premises of the
nation state have been questioned, journalism has a role to play in this process as
well. As political imaginaries are changing and globalized political imaginaries
are created (Cameron and Palan, 2004), it can be assumed that these global
imaginaries are reflected also in journalism and, moreover, that journalism has a
role in their construction.
In his sense, especially the role of financial journalism, and the role of the
Financial Times (FT) in particular, form an interesting subject of study. Most
on the media as well as on journalism is still very much nation-based and
directed to national readership. There are, however, also media, which have been
increasingly internationalized and can be seen as a constitutive for the new global
imaginaries. International financial journalism can be seen as reflecting these
new political forces and imaginaries of mobile finance capital. The aim here is to
understand the role of international financial quality journalism by describing
the political rationality of the FT. The analysis concentrates on the ways the FT
apprehends national democracies. How does international financial journalism
treat national democracies? How are the national imaginaries rewritten by
internationally oriented financial journalism?
Forerunner of globalization
The FT has its roots firmly in the United Kingdom but the international scope
has been a central one for the paper right from the start. The paper was founded
in the late 1880s together with the Financial News, as London was emerging as
the financial capital of the world markets and the enhancing Stock Exchange
of the British Imperium provided a promising potential readership as well as
advertisers for a financial newspaper (Kynaston, 1988: 1–2.). The birth of the
paper thus took place in the heydays of British imperialism and colonialism,
which has had a strong impact on the paper. The scope of the paper was global
as the FT – already in the early twentieth century – boldly announced having ‘the
largest circulation of any financial newspaper in the world’ and the emphasis on
the global view was substantiated in for instance the ‘Empire Section’, published
weekly from 1910 (Kynaston, 1988: 61–5).
During the twentieth century, the FT has been a forerunner of contemporary
financial globalization by paying increasing attention to the internationalization
193
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
194
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
A great body of readers, men and women in every walk of life, find that, in this
difficult mid-twentieth century world, questions which used to be the exclusive
concern of the economist and the business man exert a profound influence on
their daily life. Never have readers been do avid for guidance on everything
bearing on full employment, inflation, taxation, the future of Government
controls and similar problems. (Cited in Kynaston, 1988, 153.)
The study of the election coverage of the FT from 2000 to 2005 shows that
the paper covers national politics widely around the world. Albeit the paper was
interested in the financial issues, but also issues such as welfare, taxation,
healthcare, unemployment, immigrants, populism, wars, and civil unrest, voting
practises and frauds as well as the individual politicians were covered. In the
election stories analyzed the main themes were:
Reporting democracy
When looking at the election coverage stories, it became clear that the FT
often positions itself in favor of democracy and calls for enhanced democracy.
The countries and elections are evaluated by standards of democracy. In the
more ‘consolidated’ democracies of Western Europe, the FT’s most important
indicator of democracy is the voter turnout. For instance, in Italy the turnout of
195
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
80 per cent is greeted and framed positively in the name of democracy as ‘a great
day for democracy in Italy’ [2]. Democracy is also in the Dutch elections
presented in a positive light as the election result is endorsed ‘The old arrogant
style of the main parties has been forced to give way to more democracy. That is
a positive benefit’ [3].
The non-western countries are often assessed by their ability to conform to
the western standards of democracy. India is praised in a leading article on its
2004 elections ‘The sheer size of an election in India, with all its chaos and
exuberance, is a magnificent and humbling spectacle, which rightly commands
respect across the world’ [4].
The Mexican election results in 2000 are greeted as a revolution, as ‘a
transition from one-party rule to pluralist democracy’ which ‘completes
Mexico’s long transition from one-party dominance to pluralist democracy,
adding political maturity to a more competitive market economy’. The defeat of
the leftist Institutional Revolutionary Party is greeted with satisfaction as a step
towards ‘political maturity’, i.e. the western style of democracy of changing
governments [5].
Democracy and elections are also celebrated in the case of Japan in 2005 as
an enthusiastic voter is interviewed in an analysis story:
‘We needed a clean-out of the old system,’ said Behic Ozek, 50, a businessman.
Candan Ersoy, a 28-year-old child-minder, agreed. ‘The best thing about this
196
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
election is that we won’t have to see the same ugly old faces any more, and that
the new government, at the end of its term in office, will not be able to say ‘oh
we were not able to keep our promises because we lacked a parliamentary
majority’ [8].
In the Russian elections, the election story describes the dismal state of
the Russian democracy with a worried tone:
On the whole, Russians probably did freely express their choices on Sunday.
But the system they voted for remains far removed from a western-style idea
of democracy centred around a strong parliament that counters the power of
the executive. Low voter turnout of barely 50 per cent coupled with a sharp
rise in protest votes ‘against all’ to 5 per cent show that a significant proportion
of the Russian electorate feels disenfranchised. Voters are increasingly
disengaging from the political process little over a decade after totalitarianism
collapsed [9].
In a leader on the Russian, elections the worries over democracy are expressed
in a clear way:
Thus the FT clearly carries the flag of western democracy when assessing
the elections. The ideals of the western democracy are used when analyzing the
election results and the principles and practises of the western democracy are
supported and recommended for the non-western countries.
197
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
idea of revolution. The old system has to be dismantled and a new system
introduced. This seems to be the case also with the political imaginary of the
FT. Twenty-first century financial journalism joins the modern political
programs of reform.
The notion of reform appears in the research material over 300 times, and it
is the most common theme related to politics and elections. The political
communities are assessed by their ability and readiness for reform and change.
The politicians are classified as pro-reform or anti-reformist, and their actions
are evaluated by their readiness for reform or alternatively by their capability for
reform [11]. The news stories and commentaries are posed from the point of
the necessity of reform. Are the parties reformative or anti-reformative? Will
the election result help the reformers? Are the reformers winning? Can the
anti-reformative winners still become reformers?
As a new government faces its new term, the commentaries are often framed
as summing up a list of reform or change challenges [12]. Politicians are evaluated
by their capability to enforce reforms as well in Mexico as in Germany [13].
Often the reform is a given, an unquestionable key for solving large-scale
societal, political, and economic problems. For instance, when Silvio Berlusconi
wins the Italian elections in May 2001, his main challenge is formulated in an
analysis story by pondering ‘Berlusconi’s commitment to reform’ and by
framing his first task, backed by the authority of international economists:
198
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
For all the talk of reform and smaller government, the state reaches into much
of Japan. Government fingerprints are on everything from the lottery to
universities, telecoms to railways. The government has slashed funding to
special public corporations – essentially subsidised entities – but will still
channel $35bn their way this year. These groups waste resources and their
management is hobbled by the practice of amakudari, whereby government
officials ‘descend from heaven’ into cushy pre-retirement postings [16].
199
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
However, when the election result is in conflict with the economic reformers,
financial journalism becomes a tricky task and the reasonable voice of journalism
is used to establish the order between the discourses of economy and democracy.
The most common way of positioning the economic reform as primary over
democratic discourses is to present the economic reform program as an
inevitable and unquestionable ‘task’ or ‘sole option’ for politics. This task or
challenge is stated as a matter of fact in similar ways in both the news stories
and the more opinionated leaders and columns.
The journalistic voice of the FT seems also to have a clear sense for ‘right’
policies and a clear conception on what is to be done in different countries –
despite the election result or the voters’ will. The economic reform is the
premier issue that has to be taken care of, and only after that there is space for
democracy and politics. For instance, in Slovakia in a 2002 news story, the major
task of politics is claimed to be ‘in the fiscal area which will not be very popular’.
Thus ‘there will need to be a consensus on economic reform’ [22].
In many cases the election result is openly questioned, and in some cases the
FT even seems to invalidate the election results by maintaining that the policy
programs, which have been defeated in the elections, should still be
implemented. For instance in India, the problems start with the outcome of the
2004 election, which wipes out the reformers [23] and their ‘genuinely liberal
200
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
Also Sweden needs to rethink its policies. Social Democrats have won the
elections with a clear anti-reformative program, as the FT describes:
Despite the election results and Persson’s victory, Sweden is getting a clearly
contradictory piece of advice. In a rather definitive and even threatening tone,
the FT concludes that the new prime minister should implement policies that
have just been defeated in the elections. The FT picks up the loosing agenda of
tax cuts and recommends the prime minister to move on with them despite the
election results:
But he [Mr. Persson] needs to do more if Sweden is to reverse its long slide from
near the top to the middle of the world prosperity league. He should cut taxes -
among the highest in Europe - to stop the corporate exodus and to foster small
business. He could pay for this by streamlining public services and pruning
welfare abuse. These moves should be on the agenda for his new term [28].
The new government must recognise that sound public finance comes first,
followed by further economic restructuring. Otherwise the gains of the past few
years will be lost, as will recent success in attracting foreign investment [29].
201
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
After the German red-green victory in 2002, it is warned that if the government
should fail to make economic reforms its priority, the poll’s result could have an
adverse effect on growth. Ludwig Georg Braun, president of the assembly of the
German Chambers of Commerce calls for a reform ‘master-plan’ focused on
higher labor market flexibility, lower non-wage labor costs, modernization of the
social security system, and a working education system [30].
This idea of economic reform as a master plan of politics is a central element
in the political imaginary of the FT. The political community is described as a
primarily economic community, and the complicated political issues are
simplified and presented as having simple economic answers. The actual
contents of these reforms are, however, often discussed vaguely. Rather they are
thrown into the text as black boxes, reasonable solutions that float over the
struggling polity as if the problems of society had a simple economic solution
and as if there was a uniform and unquestionable understanding of the laws and
functions of the economy. The question is not how to make an economy
successful, but rather whether a society is willing to make the economy
successful as the way to economic prosperity consists of a clearly delineated and
well-known package of actions. The task of journalism is not to describe or
discuss the various alternative solutions to a given country’s problems but
rather to assess whether the voters and politicians are bright enough to adopt
the reasonable solution entitled economic, liberal, or fiscal reform.
202
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
Besides being ‘angry’, voters are ‘against change’ [33], ‘instinctively reform-
shy’ and ‘alarmed’ [34], ‘taking revenge’ [35], ‘venting their anger’ [36], ‘spoilt’
[37], their ‘fears are exploited’ [38], and, in the French case, they have ‘superficial
distrust’ of global capitalism [39].
In France, the FT leader formulates a clear recipe challenging the voters’
priority:
The government may be tempted to pour its energies into law and order – the
voters’ priority – and do little else. That would be a mistake. Consequently the
leader lists a variety of ‘unavoidable’ reforms such as tax cuts, the reform of
the ‘bloated’ bureaucracy and privatization [40].
The problems of the political system are often seen to lie within the irrationality
of the electorate and framed in terms of irrational populism and nationalism.
Alongside with the problems of populism [41] and ‘hard-nosed’ nationalism [42],
the notion of xenophobia is mentioned as a problem, at least in Italian, Danish,
Swedish, Russian, Austrian, Turkish, and Indian political life [43]. Sometimes,
especially in the rare stories where voters are interviewed – thus including the
‘real voice’ of ‘the man on the street’ – they are described as passive bystanders,
not interested in politics [44] and dissatisfied with politics in general.
In many cases, the inevitable reforms and the voters are seen as oppositional.
In Russia ‘the biggest problem for Putin is that modernization has to enter a stage
where reforms really hurt’ [45]. In an US election story, it is stated that the true
problems of the economy cannot be discussed in elections, as the solutions would
see Americans worse off and ‘this is the problem with the democratic process’
[46]. In Germany, the problem of the unreasonable and also morally suspect
voters is clearly delineated in an analysis story on the 2005 election. The article
takes off by saying ‘no one doubts that Germany needs radical tax reform’, but:
There lies the great dilemma. It seems that you cannot win a German election
if you promise too much reform, even if all the party leaders know that pensions,
the health service, the labour market and tax system need radical action [47].
The voters are criticized for being troubled by self-interest and for not
warming up to the idea of a flat tax:
Yet Prof Kirchhof’s flat tax solution is too radical for German voters to
swallow. Most benefit from tax breaks and they do not want to lose them.
Mr Schröder and his allies have exploited the fears by portraying the professor
as a threat to the entire German social contract [48].
Voters are, thus, depicted as self-interested economic men, who are not
capable of understanding the reasonable logic of reform. The real issues cannot
203
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
be discussed in the public election debate, as voters would not back them up.
Democratic politics are thus caught in the gridlock of the unreasonable voter.
Consequently, in some cases it is made clear that the government has to act
despite the ‘will of the electorate’. For instance, the analysis story as well as the
leading article on the 2002 Czech elections suggest that economic reforms should
be implemented even when they are adverse to the election-winning manifestos.
As the reforms do not pass in elections, they need to be implemented just after
the new government has been elected and well before the next elections.
The Prime Minister Spidla is recommended to immediately go on with an
unpopular reform well before the next elections, as the ‘main challenge’ of the
new prime minister is to cut the budget deficit and ‘to reform the welfare state,
particularly the loss-making state pension system’. The immediate pension
reform is urged by a US think tank professor concluding ‘[t]he only time a new
government can do it is one to two years after the election’ [49].
The primacy of economic reform thus rolls over democracy. If the voters do
not back the reform, it is to be implemented long before new elections take place
and the elected politicians are to act against their election promises. In cases
where the election results are in discrepancy with the ideas of the economic
reform, the former gives way. The perception of voters is formulated by the
financial journalistic discourses in ways, which do not hamper the primacy of the
economic reform.
While fitting for a morning-after speech, such flowery language gives few
answers to the key question hanging over Germany’s new government: whether
the chancellor will use his renewed mandate to introduce the far-reaching
reforms needed to kick-start the weak economy and restructure the country’s
creaking pension, health and social welfare systems [50].
Most often the suspicion with politics seems to be linked with the national
element of politics. The logics of globalizing capital and weakening of the nation
state seem to be reflected in the discourse of the FT and its suspicion towards
national politics. Politics often gets a somewhat dubious sound, as a way of dealing
204
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
with things. There is lots of suspicion with regard to the ‘old’ national interest
groups. This is related to the perspective of the global investor, who favors the new
globalizing economy:
From the point of view of foreign investors, the crucial point is that economic
reform, deregulation, privatization and the opening up of India to the world
through lower tariffs and fewer trade barriers are likely to continue [51].
This point of view seems to contribute to the rather negative tone towards
nationally based politics and economies. The post-war national systems are
seen in a negative light. The old nationally based politics are often depicted in
a negative tone and seen as opposed to economic reform. In the Turkish case, a
tough fiscal policy and the ‘cleaning up of the banking system’ are seen as
foundation for a much ‘healthier’ economy. However it is warned that ‘There is
a danger that partisan politics might again be allowed to subvert transparency
and genuine competition in the marketplace’ [52]. In Japan, the pro-market
reform, the ‘lionheart’ Prime Minister Koizumi is seen battling against the
‘political machine’ [53].
In the coverage of the Mexican elections in 2000, the until-then hegemonic
Institutional Revolutionary Party is characterized as ‘the world’s longest-ruling
political dynasty’ [54]. Mexican society is hampered by ‘oligopolists’ and ‘special
interest groups’ [55]. The German interest groups are described as ‘antediluvian’
[56]. Japan is hampered by ‘pork-barrel’ politics [57]. Politics, still very much a
national activity, is characterized as ‘partisan’, as an antidote to something
unpartisan and neutral. Politics incline towards ‘political horse trading’ [58] and
‘ideological zigzags’ [59].
After the German election 2005, the unfortunate election result is seen in
terms of an opposition between politics and economic sensibility: ‘As of today, the
politically most likely and economically least sensible option is a grand coalition
of some sort’ [60].
Junichiro Koizumi is the type of leader markets love: one with overwhelming
public support and a mandate for reform. Japan’s stock market yesterday
added its vote of approval to his landslide election victory, hitting a four-year
high [61].
205
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
In another story, the following comment is made: ‘many voters find attractive
the idea of a leader standing up for what he believes in and daring to take on the
sacred cows of the LDP’. The analysis is enhanced by quoting an informant:
‘Koizumi is taking on the ancien régime,’ says one person who has worked
closely with the prime minister. ‘He’s the only one with the guts to do it. People
like him for that’ [62].
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown forged a powerful alliance in the election
campaign in order to put Labour back in power. The central question in British
politics now is whether that co-operation will continue – or whether we will soon
be back to the old squabbles of the past. If co-operation between the prime
minister and the chancellor carries on with the same intensity seen recently, then
Labour has a chance of pushing through a third-term reform programme [64].
The idea is not about respecting the views of the elected MPs but rather about
hoping that opposing voices are silenced in the face of the ‘united front’.
In the case of Mexico, the Mexican president is compared unfavorably with
the determinate leadership of President Reagan:
Mr Reagan set an agenda with a limited number of clear priorities and hired
effective ‘enforcers’ to work for him. Mr Fox appointed a politically diverse yet
inexperienced cabinet with no clear ‘enforcer’ and failed to lay out a clear
agenda [65].
206
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
207
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
which belittle the democratic principles and practices. Moreover, the FT often
takes clear political stances and maintains the need for the implementation of
liberal economic reforms notwithstanding their poor performance in elections.
The market reforms are seen as unavoidable, despite contradicting election results.
In order to maintain the reasonability of its own political stance, the paper labels
the voters as emotional or self-interested, national politics as morally questionable
and calls for strong leaders.
The political imaginary of the FT can perhaps be understood as an element
of the political regime of globalization as an attempt to re-imagine and redefine
the national polis at the age of internationalized capital. This global imaginary
questions the reasonability of national democracies and sees them as secondary
to the primary aims of economic liberalism. The mobile capital has a need for a
political language, which reduces the local meanings and co-ordinates them in a
standardized way. David Harvey (1989: 284–307; 2001: 121–7) speaks of the
time–space compression entailed in capitalism. Capital accumulation has always
thrived for the speeding and widening up of action. It thus reduces and brings
down temporal and spatial barriers that flexible capitalism does not need and
only tolerates localized identities and polities. The early twenty-first century FT
seems to be contributing to this globalizing discourse of the liberalized economy
by questioning the premises of the nation state, national politics, and elections.
The FT seems to carry on the interest of the internationalized investor and
finance capital by trying to promote democracy and market economy in order to
open up the national economies for international finance.
The practises and discourses of modern journalism have a role to play here.
Modern journalism, which includes the financial journalism of the FT, has been
characterized by strives for autonomic professionalism, for impartiality, as well as
for independence and freedom from external control. The Anglo-Saxon press
adopted these ideals of the news paradigm first during the nineteenth century,
and their birth has been linked with the historical and economic conditions of
news production as well as with attempts to create professional integrity and to
legitimize journalistic work (Barnhurst, 2005; Pöttker, 2005a; Schudson, 2005).
This tradition of impartial professionalism should however not be understood as
the only constitutive element of journalism. In many cases, its importance might
even be exaggerated. For instance, Michael Schudson argues that the norm of
objectivity was never adopted with such fervour in British journalism as in the
case of North American journalism (Schudson, 2001: 165–7). Thus rather than
being only a fact-finding mission, journalism is a mixture of various elements
(Carpentier, 2005; Deuze, 2005; Pöttker, 2005b), and this indeed also seems to
be the case with FT’s financial journalism. Covered by the language of impartial
journalism, the paper takes strong political stances.
From the point of the democracy, the political imaginary of the FT has a
questionable element in its cynicism towards politics, voters, and democracy. The
208
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
209
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
210
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
[20] Companies International: India emerges as the new star of Asia: Democracy –
and growth, Daniel Bogler, 10 May 2004.
[21] Europe: Centre-right poll win boosts Slovakia’s EU chances, Robert Anderson
in Bratislava, 23 September 2002.
[22] Europe and International Economy: European Union hails centre-right victory
in Slovakia, Robert Anderson, 24 September 2002.
[23] Asia-Pacific: Election setback for Indian reformers, Edward Luce in New Delhi,
12 May 2004.
[24] Leader: Indian vote signals, 3 May 2004.
[25] Asia-Pacific: Election setback for Indian reformers, Edward Luce in New Delhi,
12 May 2004. Leader: India’s challenge, 19 April 2004.
[26] Asia-Pacific: Voters take revenge on India’s leading symbol of reform, Edward
Luce, 12 May 2004.
[27] World News: Jubilant Persson increases his vote, Nicholas George and
Christopher Brown-Humes in Stockholm, 16 September 2002.
[28] Leader: Same Swedes, 17 September 2002.
[29] Leader: Czech chance, 17 June 2002.
[30] German elections: Business gloomy on growth prospects, By Bertrand Benoit
in Berlin, 24 September 2002.
[31] Inside track: Colors of coalition, Daniel Bogler, 27 September 2002.
[32] Leader: Czech chance, 17 June 2002.
[33] Political gridlock in Germany reflects a vote against change, Wolfgang
Munchau, 20 September 2005.
[34] Radical reform alarms German voters, 15 September 2005.
[35] Asia-Pacific: Voters take revenge on India’s leading symbol of reform, Edward
Luce, 12 May 2004.
[36] Leader: Poll Shock, 25 September 2001.
[37] World News – Europe: Norwegian electorate set to abandon party loyalties:
There is uncertainty about which will emerge as biggest party, Christopher
Brown-Humes and Valeria Criscione, 6 September 2001.
[38] Radical Reform alarms German voters, 15 September 2005.
[39] Comment and Analysis: France goes on sale, Victor Mallet, 18 June 2002.
[40] Leader: French lessons, 18 June 2002.
211
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
212
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
213
RECLAIMING THE MEDIA
214
ON THE DARK SIDE OF DEMOCRACY
215
Journalism
ARTICLE
䊏 Gillian Doyle
University of Stirling, UK
ABSTRACT
The collapse of Enron and other corporate scandals have raised concerns about the
efficacy of financial journalism. Based on research on where reporters get their ideas for
stories and how they approach their work, this article explores the particular
circumstances in which production of financial and economic news takes place. The
author argues that, while reporters are generally highly sceptical about ‘spin’ and
strongly inclined towards highlighting instances of corporate underperformance
and mismanagement, the circumstances and constraints they work within nonetheless
make it unlikely that financial irregularities obscured within company accounts will be
detected on a routine or consistent basis. Moreover, the way in which the commercial
sector is organized (with in-depth analysis generally confined to specialist media whose
audiences are already financially literate) means that the task of facilitating a sound
public grasp over the significance of financial and economic news developments is
largely being neglected.
KEY WORDS 䊏 agendas 䊏 corporate influence 䊏 economic journalism 䊏 financial
journalism 䊏 financial press 䊏 news decisions 䊏 sources
Introduction
The processes through which financial news stories are identified and selected
for coverage typically involve some degree of interplay between a news editor
and a reporter or reporters. Journalists are expected to bring forward ideas and
more weight is given to those generated by specialists and experienced corres-
pondents. In terms of where financial journalists get the ideas that they bring
to their editors, some are self-generated but most stem from scanning other
media (especially newswires) and sifting through official releases (e.g. com-
pany or government announcements) or semi-official data (industry surveys,
etc.) that routinely flow through to the news desk.
Thus, news selection procedures are not dissimilar from many other areas
of journalism. However, judgements amongst financial reporters about news-
worthiness are very strongly governed by perceptions about utility and levels
of financial literacy amongst target audiences. A reporter working for a
specialist publication such as the FT or the Investors Chronicle (IC) may well
have a quite different sense of what is newsworthy from a financial corres-
pondent working, say, for a mainstream Sunday newspaper or at CNN.
The readership for specialist financial publications is perceived by those
constructing news on its behalf as being educated, informed and relatively
literate on issues related to the economy. According to an FT journalist:
We’re very conscious of who we are writing for. We’re writing for investors such
as city fund managers. Our role is to inform educated, professional investors.
implication, its share price. At the FT, reporters rely heavily on routine
company announcements to the Stock Exchange (e.g. about results) to
generate initial ideas. In addition, self-generated ideas may emerge from
something a journalist picks up in the course of investigating routine or ‘diary’
stories or when a sector specialist spots an emerging pattern affecting com-
panies within their ‘beat’.
Within mainstream daily newspapers, selection of stories for the business
pages also relies to a large extent on ‘diary’ events – ideas drawn from the
routine flow of daily announcements of company results, news of mergers or
acquisitions, etc. Here, however, judgements of newsworthiness reflect a
different understanding of what readers hope to get out of looking at business
news and in which investment information is by no means seen as the main
angle. Typically, one of the main drivers underlying choice of stories is
whether a lay audience (i.e. a mixed readership including many who are not
investors) will recognize the players involved. Another consideration is the
scale of the financial events involved and whether this is likely to captivate a
non-specialist audience. One daily journalist describes the process of sifting
ideas for news stories as follows:
You tend to think about the size of the deal involved – numbers. When you’re
talking about multi-billion pound deals then that is considered very sexy indeed.
The other thing that would be considered of great value is if the companies
involved are household names. And that’s why retail companies get an awful lot
of coverage – because everyone knows them . . .
If there is a personal aspect – directors and pay-offs – then that can be helpful.
People have been interested over recent years in reward for failure and ‘fat cat
pay’ stories.
Companies as sources
require two and ideally three independent sources for each story. Nonetheless,
at least one attribute is widely shared amongst financial journalists whose job
it is to report, explain and comment on corporate performance – that is,
scepticism about corporate ‘spin’.
The relentless drive towards positive self-portrayal by companies is widely
acknowledged by financial reporters as endemic to their field. The growth of
corporate and financial PR over recent decades may be seen as part and parcel
of the wider ascendancy of ‘spin culture’ (discussed by, for example, Davis,
2002; Franklin, 1994; Jones, 2000). A variety of methods are deployed by
journalists in order to maintain an independent and critical stance. According
to one financial correspondent: ‘You start with the assumption that the press
release is not telling you the whole story.’
To arrive at a more fully informed understanding of whatever event has
taken place, a series of discussions or interviews with company and other
‘expert’ sources is needed to gather follow-up information. That the motives
which lie behind any source choosing to speak to the press need to be
considered is widely appreciated. Being well informed, building up good
relationships (though not too good) and retaining one’s cynicism are seen as
important tools for extracting useful and ‘truthful’ information from corporate
contacts. All the reporters interviewed in the course of this study were
emphatic about the need to retain a critical distance in relation to corporate
sources. As one explains:
We know we’re being spun to, but we do bring our own judgement to it . . . You’re
not going to be captivated because of a few freebies or a nice lunch.
[T]he prospect of losing access because you take a critical stance is more of a
threat to analysts than to journalists, at least at the FT. There have been cases of
equities analysts being sacked because of writing unfavourable reports about
companies . . . Companies can write to the editor and complain that I’m an
asshole and that would be embarrassing. But they don’t have the power to make
a journalist lose his or her job.
Many regard cutting through spin and criticizing, where criticism is due,
as precisely the essence of their job. They see themselves as performing a
‘watchdog’ role in relation to corporate performance and conduct and are
therefore innately disposed towards identifying and bringing to light any
problems and instances of poor management or failure within corporations.
Even so, one or two acknowledge that, since hostile coverage of a company
may jeopardize future access, relationships with useful corporate contacts need
to be ‘managed carefully’.
Some companies and individuals try to deter unfavourable press coverage
by, for example, harassing journalists and/or striking up an aggressively
libellous stance:
The FT obviously has a huge advantage in that, by and large, they’ve got to speak
to us. So you can be fairly robust really. But [journalist A] who covered the whole
[company X] thing had a terrible time with them because they were always trying
to deny that things were going wrong. She knew things were bad. She would
write things and they would ring up and complain and bully. They really did try
very hard. And of course she was right. And in the end they all had to get the
sack. But that’s the sort of thing that can happen.
Robert Maxwell for example . . . had a complete system of bullying. . . [a]nd for
years got away with it. People were too terrified to write things about him
because he would sue.
And at the moment [company Y] are suing people right, left and centre. They’re
suing us. There is this fear.
Analysts
Journalists certainly rely on analysts quite a bit to do the interpreting for them of
the performance of companies and of economies . . . [and] for off-the-peg
opinions and quick reactions to the things where we feel they are better briefed
than we are.
Although the Enron episode and other recent financial scandals have given
rise to criticism of journalists (and, even more so, auditors and analysts who
failed to register any irregularities), it is not clear that the prevailing order
encourages or equips reporters to recognize and pursue instances of deliberate
and well-disguised impropriety (Oborne, 2002: 55). As discussed above, what
passes for business or financial journalism can vary widely. Those who put
financial news together draw on a wide variety of methods of sourcing and
investigation including, in some but not all cases, elements of financial
analysis.
Serious investor-oriented financial journalism requires corporate reporters
not only to comment on events as they unfold but also to reflect on whether,
on the basis of whatever information is readily accessible about a company’s
finances and operating environment, the market valuation of its shares looks
appropriate. Many reporters who operate successfully in this particular do-
main have both an aptitude for and interest in disentanglement of complex
financial information. The need to subject all business models and espoused
managerial virtues to critical and independent examination is widely acknowl-
edged. Even so, time pressures being a commonly cited problem, it appears
doubtful whether routine analysis by journalists is liable to result in consistent
detection of financial irregularities that have been deliberately obscured
within company accounts.
According to one news editor:
Lack of time for reflection on ‘things that deserve a closer look’ is one
difficulty, but, even when a situation is spotted (say, with the help of a whistle-
blower) where the financial success of a business appears questionable or
unconvincing, journalists may still face many additional hurdles. Most jour-
nalists spoken with take the view that, even when armed with well-informed
suspicions, gaining support for the sustained investigation needed to compile
a credible body of evidence for the story is likely to prove highly challenging.
One business reporter stated that the failure of journalists to detect financial
problems at Enron:
. . . is not surprising and it would not be surprising to see this happen again.
I would always see this as being about resources. It’s not that there is any
disinclination to do stories like this. People at a morning conference are going
to get far more excited about the story of an Enron collapse than Enron new
figures . . .
But if I got a tip-off that [Company X] was massively cooking the books and
asked for a week off to follow it up then it would be very hard – people would be
highly sceptical.
Although such biases are recognizable, the problem remains that self-
interested parties are sometimes the main or sole repositories of relevant data
– it is they who generate and control access to the expert knowledge that
economics reporters rely on.
Some of the sources that economics reporters rely on are prone to extreme
and/or deeply entrenched viewpoints, based not on motives of self-interest but
on genuine professionally informed beliefs about how the economy works.
Economics is, by its nature, a site for differing and disputed impressions of the
same reality by ‘experts’ (as evidenced, for example, by the differing pre-
dispositions of individual members of the Monetary Policy Committee who
advise the Bank of England ahead of each monthly decision on interest rates).
So, even where self-interest is not present as a concern, economic news
coverage that aims to be even handed demands of journalists an approach that
is sufficiently well informed and critical to negotiate a panoply of differing
professional interpretations of events past and future.
It is widely acknowledged that there is a strong political dimension to
economic reporting, not least because governments are generally seen as
responsible for the health and ‘stewardship’ of the economy (Goddard et al.,
1998). Susceptibility to political prejudice is an obvious pitfall that economics
journalists need to be aware of, albeit that, in the UK at least, political
partisanship is an accepted aspect of mainstream newspaper journalism and
one that spills over into the business pages. For specialist financial publica-
tions, the general aim is usually to achieve neutral and objective economic
reportage. Whether or not neutrality is an aim, journalists who report critically
about the handling of the domestic economy are liable to experience
a backlash.
According to one UK economics reporter:
. . . we see this, for example, in the way that our relationship with the Treasury
develops. Public finances and public borrowing are a big deal in the UK. We see
that if we report this critically, we get loads of phone calls from the political
people in the Treasury. Not only the political people but also the official press
officers and civil servants who shouldn’t have a political outlook on things but
do. They say why are you reporting us so critically and aren’t we doing well.
There is, immediately, a [sense that] you’re attacking the government. So politics
is always present.
Pressure against negative reportage can take many forms – journalists and
publications whose views are critical may, for example, find they receive less
favourable treatment in terms of access to leaked data about the economy or to
exclusive interviews with ministers. Whilst such pressure may be seen as an
occupational hazard, the consequences of it in terms of an informed citizenry
and democracy are worthy of further research and analysis.
Thus, the specialist knowledge that may be required to succeed as an
economics reporter is not necessarily confined to that concerned with the
technical workings of the economy. Whilst a degree of expertise in this respect
is obviously conducive to effective economic news analysis, it is worth noting
that, within some mainstream media, little or no special distinction is made
between economic and other business news, and financial journalists are
expected to cover both. Relevant knowledge and experience is, however,
highly important in sensitizing reporters to the agendas of relevant economic
players and sources.
A pro-business agenda?
Some studies that have considered financial news coverage have argued that
journalists are, in a sense, ‘captured’ by corporate and pro-business agendas
(Davis, 2002). The findings presented here confirm that specialist financial
news coverage is primarily investor-driven in emphasis, but whether the
overall agenda is so narrow as to preclude all interests other than corporate
ones from finding expression is questionable.
Company news is, most certainly, a central concern within financial
journalism. Even so, the findings of this study suggest that reporters generally
believe that investors want and need the performance of business entities and
the competencies of their managers to be dissected critically – something
which most pride themselves as being good at, notwithstanding corporate
resistance to critical coverage. As previous research has identified (Tumber,
1993), much financial news coverage is negative, pointing to failures of
management, results that have disappointed, contracts that have been broken,
deals that have not worked out, etc. Thus, the picture painted of the corporate
world by specialist financial media is often far from rosy.
Many financial journalists recognize corporate performance as being a
multi-dimensional concept. Whereas some unquestionably see their own
remit as centred purely around providing investment information, others,
especially those addressing more generalist audiences, interpret their role
more broadly. Those in the latter category are, to some extent at least, trying to
cater to the fundamental shared appetites that audiences have for a more
rounded knowledge of the world around them, including in respect of the
economy and financial markets.
Financial journalism does, therefore, at least sometimes turn a critical gaze
towards aspects and consequences of how business is conducted that extend
beyond the concerns of investors. Entertaining stories about superhero CEOs,
boardroom coups and unwarranted salary increases form part of this fare. So
too do more weighty news items examining corporate governance, employ-
ment practice, regional development, consumer and environmental issues.
One business news editor explains:
There are a lot of business reporters in print and in TV as well who allow
themselves to take the line of least resistance and whose journalism will reflect
being pushed and pulled by different corporate interests. But there are other
interests trying to make their voices heard and that do get heard in the [business]
media. TV manages it sometimes and print manages it a lot of the time very well.
They include academics who we bring in to comment on economic, financial
and political and other news we cover. Interest groups like environmental groups.
Consumer representatives. And a lot of times we are responding to and seeking to
get the input of groups that are speaking against the message that the corporate
world is giving. For example, stories reflecting doubts about how much integrity
there is within drug companies resisting revealing the results of their research
when it may prove detrimental to the fortunes of their own drugs being sold. So,
I think a lot of my colleagues are aware that there are alternatives to the lines
being peddled by companies. There are definitely examples where those other
voices get to be heard in the debate about whatever is the business story of
the day.
ought to be aware that in fact there may be people who would disagree that a step
towards the WTO (and towards embracing a market economy system and a sort
of US-based model of economics and, in some sense, politics) was a step in the
right direction for that country. And she agreed that that was not an assumption
that we should embody in the way we write about it.
We operate within a system. We are critical of certain things within the system
but we never challenge the parameters of the system as a whole. In terms of
economic development, we write about, say, whether countries have been
successful in reducing their debt level but we don’t ask why we have a system
whereby countries have debts in the first place. We don’t challenge – but I’m
afraid that’s the deal. If I wanted to be a campaigner I wouldn’t be here. . . [and
wouldn’t have this platform]. I’m aware of this and sometimes it is frustrating
but, on the other hand, I still think we do a good job in terms of highlighting
certain things. We are not campaigning but we are working within the con-
straints of reality.
Financial reporters, like those in any other sector, are subject to the
‘constraints of reality’ – the guiding confines embodied by, for example,
assumptions about newsworthiness and what readers want or about appro-
priate presentational formats or standard practices for newsgathering – that
make production of news on a daily basis a more possible task. As previous
research has indicated, shared conventions about newsworthiness, while help-
ing to transform ‘difficult decisions into routine choices’, also serve to mini-
mize the role that the preferences and judgements of individual journalists
might otherwise play (Tiffen, 1989: 66–7). That this is ‘the deal’ may be widely
accepted. But institutionalized routines and shared norms do not altogether
extinguish the ambition and possibility for individuals to ‘highlight certain
things’ and, in so doing, to re-shape accepted contours for public discourse
about finance and the economy.
Conclusions
This exploratory study of financial journalism has centred around the ques-
tion of where reporters get their ideas for stories. The answer, in most cases, is
that a few ideas are self-generated thanks to coming across an interesting piece
of information or a trend or discrepancy from a trend but the majority of ideas
considered newsworthy will be drawn from the routine flow of corporate and
economic news releases and through ‘cribbing’ from other media. Not surpris-
ingly, one of the main drivers underlying choice of stories is the perceived
interests of audiences. On this account, a fairly sharp contrast is discernable
within financial news coverage. News selection within outlets that are primar-
ily concerned with servicing the informational needs of investors is governed
by a relatively clear shared understanding of what is newsworthy – i.e. issues
with potential to impact on the landscape for investment. For business
segments within mainstream media, conceptions about newsworthiness are
more fluid.
Financial news selection decisions within mainstream media are strongly
determined by the need not to lose the interest of lay audiences. So, although
news choices tend to reflect a general aim to keep audiences abreast of
significant developments in the realm of business and the economy, the
emphasis of what is judged newsworthy differs from specialist publications
in at least two important respects. First, attention is focused primarily and in
some cases almost exclusively on large corporate names, well recognized
brands and, in economic news, on a handful of topics perceived to be
understood by and of interest to the public at large. Second, in terms of points
of engagement offered to audiences, a somewhat more varied range of con-
cerns and issues may find representation and, in particular, entertainment is
likely to feature far more strongly. Indeed, so-called financial and business
news is, in some cases, so centred around personal dramas (e.g. the struggles
and showdowns of ailing or arrogant CEOs or the anguish of fans in relation to
acquisition of UK sports clubs by foreigners) it is difficult to be sure whether
what is being offered is financial news in the guise of entertainment or
vice versa.
Financial journalism is sometimes stereotyped as involving a pro-
corporate bias, as though choices made about the content and framing of
financial news are governed by a deliberate wish to portray corporations and
their activities in a positive light. This conception is flawed. In covering
corporate news, financial reporters tend to be extremely sceptical in their
approach to how reliably companies account for themselves. Indeed, some
journalists see corporate reportage as prone to favour negative over positive
news – a point which reinforces findings highlighted in earlier research work
(Tumber, 1993). Stories of competent management and stable performance,
when compared with other news media is quite exceptional in the ambition of
its analytical depth and range. Financial news segments within mainstream
media do not share the same ambitions, in deference to the perceived resist-
ance of lay audiences to technical analysis, but nonetheless contribute to an
increasingly rich and varied infrastructure of news provision via which the
public at large now enjoys ready access to commentary about all major
financial and economic developments.
Financial journalists are not oblivious to their own power to shape the
way that news events are accounted for. Notably, however, most spoken to in
the course of this study would not immediately recognize their role as
embodying any broad public responsibilities. Some refer to the ‘watchdog’ role
reporters play in relation to corporate behaviour. Others express a sense of
duty to get at the truth – to avoid being manipulated by corporate or other
sources and, within economic reporting, to try to provide objective reportage
on politically sensitive issues. One or two suggest they might feel differently
on this question if they worked for the BBC.
A burning desire to facilitate an improved grasp on the part of the general
public over business and economic issues does not appear to factor highly in
the conscious understanding that financial journalists in the commercial
sector have of what purposes their professional activities serve. The need for
comprehensible exposition of any given story is, of course, well recognized.
But this is not the same as an active sense of responsibility in relation to
bringing about a citizenry that is widely informed as to the meaning and
significance of business and economic events.
Previous research has emphasized the importance of the audience’s ability
to comprehend economic news. A good grasp of the workings of the economy
and of how it is or ought to be managed is needed by the public in order to
make an ‘informed appraisal of politicians and government actions upon
which the democratic process depends’ (Goddard et al., 1998: 33). The secrets
and implications of how businesses create wealth are of concern to all rather
than a few. Be that as it may, the findings of this initial survey suggest that
financial journalists, at least in the commercial sector (which is where the
activity is predominantly located), are largely unaware of responsibilities they
might perform in relation to civic empowerment and democracy.
Moreover, this research has found that the way that the sector is organized
means that the task of securing a sound public understanding of financial and
economic news issues is overlooked because, in a sense, it falls between two
stools. Financial media that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage are
aimed at audiences who are already knowledgeable about business and the
economy and whose interests are typically professionally driven. On the other
hand, segments devoted to business news within mainstream media, fearful of
deterring lay audiences, are generally unable to do penetrating and forensic
Acknowledgements
With thanks to all interviewees who participated in this research and especially Dan
Bogler at the Financial Times and Adrian Bowden at CNN. Thanks also to two
anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. The author has previously worked as an
equities analyst and in financial journalism.
Notes
References
Davis, A. (2000) ‘PR, Business News and Corporate Elite Power’, Journalism 1(3):
282–304.
Davis, A. (2002) Public Relations Democracy: Public Relations, Politics and the Mass Media
in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dreier, P. (1982) ‘Capitalism V the Media: An Analysis of an Ideological Mobilization
among Business Leaders’, Media Culture & Society 4(2): 111–32.
Galbraith, J. K. (2004) The Economics of Innocent Fraud: Truth for Our Time. London:
Allen Lane.
Franklin, B. (1994) Packaging Politics: Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democ-
racy. London: Arnold.
Glasgow University Media Group (1976) Bad News. London: Routledge.
Glasgow University Media Group (1980) More Bad News. London: Routledge.
Goddard, P., J. Corner, N. T. Gavin and K. Richardson (1998) ‘Economic News and the
Dynamics of Understanding: The Liverpool Project’, in N. T. Gavin (ed.) The
Economy, Media and Public Knowledge, pp. 9–37. Studies in Communication and
Society Series, R. Negrine and A. Hansen (eds). London: Leicester University
Press.
Biographical notes
Chrystia Freeland offers advice for print journalists working in business journalism in the current market
for print news...and in light of the tightly-controlled media relations of companies facing financial crises.
These are grim days for print journalists: we are the auto workers of the white-collar class, toiling in an
industry in structural decline (see: sale of Newsweek for $1). But this summer's best-seller list offers
some relief for the world's inky-fingered wretches. The hero of our collective imaginations is a middle-aged
print reporter named Mikael Blomkvist, the Swedish muckraker who co-stars in Stieg Larsson's Millennium
trilogy, which is dominating beaches and airport lounges this season.
For business scribes, Blomkvist's celebrity is especially satisfying. Business journalists are the high
school nerds of the newsroom, lacking the dangerous glamour of the war correspondents, the proximity to
fame of the sports and entertainment writers, and the alpha-dog swagger of the political press corps.
Blomkvist offers the business press hipness by association. His investigations take him beyond the
ascetic world of balance sheets and offshore bank accounts to showdowns with former K.G.B. sadists.
Better yet, although he is the divorced father of an adult daughter, and a smoker who runs mostly to keep
his paunch in check, he is catnip to women. If James Bond were reincarnated as a crusading Swedish
feminist, he would be Mikael Blomkvist.
There's just one catch: Blomkvist despises the mainstream business press almost as much as he
loathes the corrupt businessmen who are his chief targets. Blomkvist, who writes for an independent
magazine he helped found, accuses establishment business journalists of getting too close to the
magnates they cover. They have access, he complains, but they fail to do the "real" work of uncovering
corporate malfeasance.
Larsson, himself an investigative journalist, died in 2004, before the financial crisis. But if he were
reviewing the books inspired by the meltdown, he would surely reiterate his protagonist's dyspeptic
critique of business reporting. The best writing on the crisis has been from the inside out, starting with
Andrew Ross Sorkin's "Too Big to Fail" - a vivid, nearly instantaneous account of Wall Street in 2008 that
stands as that pivotal year's first draft of history.
Michael Lewis does something even smarter and more original in "The Big Short," recounting the crash
from the perspective of a small tribe of investors who had the insight and the audacity to foresee the
crisis and profit from it. But while Lewis writes about iconoclastic outsiders, he profiles their lives and
trades very much from the inside. "I've found it impossible to write a decent nonfiction narrative without
unusually deep cooperation from my subjects," Lewis explains in his acknowledgments, thanking his
traders for allowing him "to enter their lives."
Lewis is "eternally grateful" to his subjects for their cooperation. Sorkin, a reporter and columnist for The
New York Times, is "truly grateful" to his. One can imagine Blomkvist sputtering with rage, but you don't
have to be a fictional Scandinavian social democrat to wish that business journalism in the United States
was more about afflicting the comfortable and less about cozying up to them. In the spring, the high
priests of American journalism at the Columbia Journalism Review published a tough critique of Sorkin by
Dean Starkman, who argued that "Too Big to Fail" was on one side - the wrong side - in the "mini-
struggle" between "deal journalism and the work of accountability-oriented reporters."
That article rightly highlighted the important investigative work done by reporters with a "more
confrontational approach," like Gretchen Morgenson and Don Van Natta Jr., both of The Times, and Mark
Pittman of Bloomberg News, who wrote a 2007 series predicting the collapse of the banking sector. But
the bigger, more complicated truth about the financial crisis is that it wasn't caused by evil businessmen.
The overarching story is one of systemic failure, not individual wrongdoing. It wasn't the Bernie Madoffs
who plunged the world into recession. It was low capital requirements, weak limits on leverage, over-the-
counter traded derivatives, soft rules on mortgage lending and global financial imbalances.
If your attention wandered as you read that list of abstract terms, you are not alone. A growing body of
cognitive research is demonstrating something schoolteachers and entertainers have known for a long
time: Most of us respond better to personal stories than to impersonal numbers and ideas. That cognitive
bias is so pronounced that Deborah Small, a professor of marketing at the Wharton School, has found
that charitable giving actually goes down if too many statistics are included in individual tales of need
(and if we get only statistics and don't learn any personal stories, giving is even lower). Forget "just the
facts, ma'am." Actually, forget the facts altogether.
1
For readers, that same bias means we are drawn to stories about people, not systems. When it comes
to the financial crisis, we want heroes and villains and whathe-had-for-breakfast narratives; we are less
enthralled by analytical accounts of the global financial system and the cycle of boom and bust. The
Columbia Journalism Review - and Blomkvist - juxtapose the approaches of "access" and "investigative"
journalists. But the real divide may be between storytellers and system analysts. (This is one of many
reasons that anyone interested in the financial crisis and its causes should venture farther down the best-
seller list and dip into "This Time Is Different," a lucid and unapologetically dense study of eight centuries
of financial crises by the economists Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff.)
This dichotomy goes beyond writers and newspaper front pages to our legislatures and even the
campaign trail. Financial reform legislation didn't become sexy until the Securities and Exchange
Commission unveiled its case against Goldman Sachs. The "fabulous Fab," as Fabrice Tourre, the
Goldman trader who bet against subprime mortgages, called himself, and his colorful e-mails were a story
right out of Small's research. It packed such a viscerally powerful punch that almost no one, apart from
the great vampire squid's P.R. team, bothered to note that because of the firm's fine culture of risk
management, Goldman was probably less culpable in the 2008 crisis than any other investment bank.
Fabulous Fab's shenanigans (and great name!) not only helped pass the financial reform bill, they cost
Goldman $550 million, the biggest settlement ever paid to the S.E.C. Score one for the storytellers. But
that is likely to be a temporary triumph, and not only because Goldman now prohibits its employees from
using vulgar language in e-mails, presumably to ensure that the next documents the bank is forced to
disgorge aren't quite so vivid.
We are living in the age of number-crunchers, not narrators. On Wall Street, in Silicon Valley, in
Bangalore and in Shanghai, the new technologies and the capital flows that are reshaping our world are
dominated by the people who master data dumps. This split - more than geography, more than gender,
more than what your parents did for a living - may be the real class divide of our time.
Even Larsson, who created Blomkvist at least partly in his own image, knew this. That's why the more
eye-catching partner in his crime-busting duo is the quasiautistic number-cruncher extraordinaire Lisbeth
Salander. Female readers may be dubious of the 20-something Salander's not-totally-requited passion for
Blomkvist, but what really rings false in their relationship is the idea that Blomkvist would be Salander's
boss, and not vice versa. There have been reports that Larsson once told a friend that the fourth novel in
the series, left unfinished at the time of his death, would follow the pair to a remote island town in
Canada's Northwest Territories. But a more plausible plot would involve Salander's move to Palo Alto and
the start-up of her global data mining and security firm.
Will ___ save journalism? Lately it seems easier to find ruminations on that subject than to find
journalism itself. With advertising down and the Internet making information seem free and easy, anxious
journos (for whom "save journalism" equals "save my job") have suggested numerous white knights for
their profession, including Amazon's Kindle, philanthropists, micropayments, the government and the new
iPhone. (Is there an app for that?)
Or coffee! Maybe coffee will save journalism! In June, MSNBC signed a deal to make Starbucks the
official caffeinated beverage of its talk show Morning Joe. In 2008 a chain of TV affiliates cut a deal to
place McDonald's iced coffee on anchor desks.
Those who can't sell coffee can try to sell Kaffeeklatsches. The Washington Post was embarrassed this
month by a leak of its plans to charge up to $25,000 for lobbyists and executives to sponsor "salons" with
public officials and the reporters who cover the fields they work in, like health care. "Spirited? Yes," a flyer
said of the promised talks. "Confrontational? No." Journalism? Someday it just might be.
Some of these experiments may seem ethically dubious or just icky, but they're also examples of a
simple truth: whether you read it online or watch it on TV, there's no such thing as free news. Someone,
somewhere, is paying for it, be it in money or in time. And journalists are under pressure to become more
creative in paying that bill.
Once, said payment came from the audience or from advertisers. Now the Internet offers all-you-can-
eat info, yet advertisers are unwilling to pay anywhere near the same rates for online ads as they do for
print or TV ads, and the Web has all but supplanted newspaper classifieds.
2
The New York Times is reportedly readying plans to start charging for online access, while a group of
newspaper execs has been looking into the legality of banding together to do the same. News outlets are
selling software, merchandise, club memberships--anything that people are more willing to pay for than,
well, news.
It's possible, though, that nothing will save the journalism business--at least as we know it and pay for it
today. That doesn't mean journalism will go away. Reporting won't go away, though foreign bureaus might.
Information won't go away. Opinion certainly won't.
But somebody will have to pay--even, or especially, for the free stuff. Some journalism could become a
kind of volunteer work, performed by eyewitnesses, passionate amateurs or professionals in other fields
who use journalism as a loss leader to sell their books or build their brands. (That's the model of the
legion of unpaid writers at the Huffington Post.) Even if you filter your own news from Twitter, you're
paying in time and effort.
Those seeking to pay the bills through full-time journalism could find different paymasters. The
Associated Press recently started taking investigative reports from four nonprofit journalism groups. And if
newspapers can't afford investigations, advocacy groups and think tanks--which already hire research
pros--could do their own: a kind of piecemeal return to the old partisan press.
Meanwhile, the advertisers who are loath to pay for banner ads at websites have shown interest in, as
they say, more "integrated" forms of product-plugging. Some news sites sell companies "sponsored
content" mentioning their products, while independent blogs collect payoffs for posts--positive ones only,
please--about merchandise. (Where did I learn about that? From the New York Times, which had to report
the story without sponsorship from Healthy Choice.)
The media of the future may be a combination of all this, plus old-school outlets that survive. They
could produce good journalism. (After all, traditional news outlets aren't without potential conflict either; I
review HBO series even though HBO's owner owns TIME.) But they may include funding models far
different from the old church-and-state separation of content-making and money-raising.
Journalists would be foolish, though, to think we can guilt people into buying our work in part to
preserve our uniquely holy calling. (Try arguing that to a laid-off factory worker.) As with any other service,
people will buy it or they won't. Yes, news audiences will have to recognize that "free" information may
mean more sponsorships and piper payers calling the tune. But journalists will have to accept that some
members of our audience are, in fact, willing to make that trade-off, just as they live with product
placement in movies.
We may not like it, but there it is. Producing something that someone is willing to pay for--while not
selling out--may make our work possible. Whereas moralizing, plus a buck or so, will buy you a cup of
robust, piping hot Dunkin' Donuts coffee. That one was free, fellas.
~~~~~~~~
In this first article in Personal Finance's new Scrapbook series Bruce Cameron deals with split
investment products. There is a wide range of these complex products. This week we set the scene by
describing the various types of split investment products available. In the following weeks we will deal in
more detail with the particular choices you have.
What are they? Split investment products go under many names and come in many forms including
linked products, multi-manager funds, fund of funds unit trusts, and wrap funds.
What happens is: One company will offer you a single investment product in which to place your money;
and with the product you will be offered a variety of investment choices, sometimes only provided by one
company but increasingly provided by other companies. For example you could choose from the full range
of unit trust funds available.
The first of these options was offered by linked product companies about 10 years ago. These
companies offer a range of unit trust investments, often wrapped up in an embracing mother product,
such as a living annuity.
3
Business journalism ethics in Africa:
A comparative study of newsrooms in
South Africa, Kenya and Zimbabwe
By Admire Mare and Robert Brand
Abstract
This article aims to provide an insight into the state of business journalism ethics
in Africa, firstly, through an examination of newsroom ethical policies and secondly
through an exploration of the way in which African business journalists negotiate
ethical decision-making in their day-to-day news processing practices. The
researchers employed document analysis and semi-structured interviews to examine
Business Day in South Africa, Business Daily in Kenya and Financial Gazette in
Zimbabwe. In these African countries, business journalism has been steadily
growing since the late 1960s, fuelled by the presence of robust stock exchanges and
increasing debate on the issue of business journalism ethics. The research found
that while all three newspapers had clear ethical guidelines in place and editors and
journalists recognized the importance of ethical behavior, ethical practice did not
always follow. This is largely due to the precarious economic basis of news
organizations, lack of effective monitoring, and a pervasive culture of unethical
behavior at some sites.
Introduction:
Conceptualising business journalism
Economics, business and financial journalism are “closely related
forms of journalistic endeavour and the terms are often used
interchangeably, even though there are distinctions between them”
(Kariithi, 2003). This study uses the term “economics journalism” to
refer to journalism about business, financial markets and economics,
and uses the terms “business journalism”, “economics journalism” and
Author biographical note
Admire Mare ([email protected]) is an MA candidate at the School of Journalism
and Media Studies, Rhodes University, South Africa. This article is based on his thesis research,
funded by the Centre for Economics Journalism at Rhodes University.
Robert Brand ([email protected]) (M.Phil, University of Stellenbosch; PGDHE, Rhodes
University) is a Senior Lecturer in the Pearson Chair of Economics Journalism at the School
of Journalism and Media Studies, Rhodes University, South Africa.
AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Terje S. Skjerdal for his valuable
input, and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on this article.
407
Admire Mare and Robert Brand
408
Business journalism ethics in Africa
ethics (Tambini, 2009, p. 2). It has brought into sharp focus the
intricate relationship between business journalism and the operations
and behavior of financial and economic markets, and also the need for
ethical journalism within the genre. The notion of business journalism
ethics, like general media ethics, arguably has an Anglo-American
ancestry (Ward, 2006; Schudson, 2001). Underpinning the notion of
journalism ethics is the belief that the media have a role to play in
society. As a result, debates on journalism ethics and self-regulation are
often informed by a normative approach, centred on the social
responsibilities of the media.
Business journalism ethics is located within the broader ambit of
media ethics. Thinking around business journalism ethics therefore
needs to be underpinned by a philosophy of the role of business
journalism in society, including the relationship between business
journalism and the market economy. Tambini (2009) has developed a
conceptual model for understanding the rights and duties of financial
journalists. At the core of this model is the understanding that the
financial media, in addition to their informational and monitoring role,
have the power to influence the prices of individual securities such as
bonds and stocks. Whereas the broader discourse of journalism ethics
focuses on the relationship between society and the media, business
journalism ethics is, in addition, concerned with the relationship
between news and markets.
Business journalism ethics addresses questions such as: What
responsibility do journalists have when their stories can have direct
impacts on market behavior? Should the ethical and professional
standards of business and financial journalists differ from those of
others such as political journalists? Should journalists avoid “panicking
the markets”? What about direct conflicts of interest? How can
journalists deal with conflicting responsibilities in relation to their
various overlapping constituencies – to readers, investors, to
corporations, to governments and to national economies? What
happens when journalists themselves, or those close to them, hold
shares in a company?
There is a large body of research on media accountability and
professionalism globally and in some African countries which argues
that the quality of media content is deteriorating (Chari, 2007;
Nyamnjoh, 2005; Mfumbusa, 2008). A spike in ethical transgressions
comes at a time when regulation of the media by the state has become
a discredited practice (Duncan, 2010), yet many media systems
African Communication Research, Vol 3 , No. 3 (2010) 407-430
409
Admire Mare and Robert Brand
410
Business journalism ethics in Africa
412
Business journalism ethics in Africa
Accuracy
The three codes are remarkably similar in the way they address
business journalists’ fundamental obligation to be truthful and report
the news accurately, and what should be done in the event of
inaccurate reporting. There is a clear recognition of the importance of
accuracy in business journalism, where news can have an immediate
impact on markets by moving the prices of securities. All three codes
also recognize the importance of fairness in reporting, and include the
responsibility to correct mistakes promptly. Business Daily’s code of
conduct and ethics states the following with regard to accuracy: The
fundamental objective of a journalist is to report fairly, accurately and
without bias on matters of public interest. All sides of a story should be
reported. It is important to obtain comments from anyone mentioned
in an unfavorable context. Whenever it is recognized that an
inaccurate, misleading or distorted report has been published, it should
be corrected promptly. Corrections should report the correct
information and not restate the error except when clarity demands.
Business Day’s code operationalizes the quest for accuracy and fairness
as follows:
Take every possible step to ensure that both praise and criticism
are backed up by knowledgeable, independent sources, ensure
that anyone who is criticised is given an opportunity to respond,
make an active attempt to seek out and highlight the independent
view, and written editorial policy for each publication that is
distributed to all employees. (Code of ethics, BDFM, South Africa).
414
Business journalism ethics in Africa
Bribery
Bribery of journalists has become ubiquitous in some African
countries (Ndangam, 2006; Chari, 2007), and business journalists are
not immune to temptation. It was clear that all three codes consider
bribery as a threat to journalistic integrity which compromises the
credibility of the media organization. The codes also recognize that the
corrupting effect of bribery does not depend on a quid pro quo by the
journalist, but that a gift or “freebie” may also compromise the
independence and integrity of a journalist. The Nation Media Group
code of ethics exemplifies the zero-tolerance approach to bribery:
This extract reflects that the organization would like its business
journalists not only to avoid conflicts of interest but also the
appearances of such conflicts. All situations capable of creating undue
familiarity are expected to be avoided or handled cautiously. The
BDFM code of ethics calls upon business journalists to desist from
accepting gifts and bribes. It cautions:
any other story, anyone taking a trip should make a point of seeking
out opinions other than those of the sponsor, e.g. competitors, analysts,
other governments. Paid accommodation and transport while on
assignment may be accepted on the sole criterion of whether it benefits
the publication. All invitations must be routed in writing through the
editor or whoever the editor delegates. (Code of ethics, BDFM, South
Africa).
Conflicts of interest
Two of the codes – those applying at the Business Daily and the
Business Day – include rules regulating coverage of companies in which
the journalist owns shares. Such rules are a near-universal feature of
business journalism ethics codes in the Anglo-American tradition
(Tambini, 2010), and are instituted in addition to legislative measures
designed to prevent insider trading or market manipulation. However,
while recognizing the need to regulate share ownership by business
journalists, ethics codes deal with the issue differently. Some require
share ownership to be disclosed to editors or to readers, while others
prohibit journalists from owning shares in companies they cover. The
Business Daily code requires business journalists not to write about
shares in whose performance they know that they, their close families
or associates have significant financial interest, without disclosing the
interest to the editor:
Even where the law does not prohibit it, journalists should not
use for their own profit financial information they receive in
advance of its general publication nor should they pass that
information to others. They should not buy or sell, either directly
or through nominees or agents, shares or securities about which
they intend to write in the near future. Utmost care should be
exercised by journalists in giving any interpretation to financial
information. (Code of conduct, Business Daily, Kenya).
Business Day’s code of ethics, on the other hand, does not restrict share
ownership by its journalists, but requires disclosure: “Where a
journalist has an interest and/or is a player in an industry, he/she
should request the newsdesk to disclose this at the bottom of the
article, or to assign the story elsewhere.”
416
Business journalism ethics in Africa
Pressure or influence
Pressure refers to any force or influence which causes a journalist to
feel strongly compelled to act in a manner desirable to the source of the
force or influence (Oloruntola, 2007). The three codes address this
ethical dilemma in different ways. The Financial Gazette’s code cautions
journalists to be wary of advertizers’ and politicians’ influence on news
reports:
Media practitioners and media institutions must not suppress or
distort information which the public has a right to know because
of pressure or influence from their advertisers or others who have
a corporate, political or advocacy interest in the media institution
concerned. (Code of ethics, Financial Gazette, Zimbabwe)
418
Business journalism ethics in Africa
At times you meet cunning CEOs who try by all means to push
their corporate news angles. In this work of ours if you refuse to
budge then he or she will approach the next guy on the line. He
can be strategically located above you, which means if he
manages to influence that one you have no choice but to run the
story. The whole process of news production is infested with
power dynamics which CEOs know how to manipulate to their
advantage. Some CEOs bargain at the top level with your CEO
before you are assigned to cover the story. Most of these
executives have honed these social capital and networks over the
years, hence they can always scratch each other ’s backs without
you understanding the dynamics of source cultivation. They
won’t endanger those social relations for anything”. (Business
reporter, Business Daily, Kenya)
Insider trading
Most codes of ethics on business journalism, especially in America
and Europe, include strict rules to prevent insider trading (Tambini,
2010). Insider trading refers to the practice of using information that is
not in the public domain to invest in securities such as shares for
individual gain. In many countries, including South Africa, this is
against the law and in breach of stock exchange regulations.
Respondents in this study stated that insider trading cannot be ruled
out, even where ethics codes have rules on share ownership and
trading by journalists. An interesting case is that of the Business Daily in
Kenya, which is situated in the same building six floors above the
Nairobi Stock Exchange. Journalists are well aware of the potential for
unethical behaviour created by this close physical proximity with the
market they cover:
We have not received any complaints thus far. However, I can say
there is no concerted programme group-wide to monitor business
journalists. I must hasten to say that not receiving complaints
doesn’t mean it’s not happening and will not happen in future.
(Business Editor, Business Daily). The Nairobi Stock Exchange is
located in the first floor of the Nation Media Centre. We know the
results ahead of everyone because we are strategically located
close to the stock exchange and also due to our journalistic
privileges. (Business reporter, Business Daily, Kenya)
Market manipulation
Market manipulation, also known as “share ramping”, is one of the
strands of business journalism ethics which is not specifically addressed
in the codes of ethics from the three media organizations. Financial
journalists can have impact on share prices through recommendation
and thereby profit by selling shares on in the short term. During
interviews with business journalists, it was clear that most of them are
420
Business journalism ethics in Africa
aware about the influence financial media can have on the prices of
stocks and bonds:
Conflicts of interest
While all genres of journalism face issues of conflict of interest,
research has shown that such issues are more pronounced in relation to
financial journalism (see Banda, 2010; Rumney, 2009; Tambini, 2010).
The intercalary position of a business journalist in relation to the
interest of the reader, investor or market makes such conflicts
unavoidable. On the one hand, business journalists see themselves as
information providers for market participants; and on the other hand
they have a watchdog role over those very market participants
(Tambini, 2010). One such conflict, already mentioned, concerns
ownership of shares of companies which a journalist covers, a situation
which may nurture the temptation to withhold information that could
hurt the company or publish information that favors it, or engage in
profit-driven market manipulation (Tambini, 2010).
While respondents were aware of the potential conflict of interest
created by owning shares, some thought it did not constitute a serious
problem. The economic condition of journalists in Africa was cited as a
justification for investing in shares and profiting from inside
information: “The paradox which business journalists are faced with
everyday is whether to give market intelligence to others to benefit
while I remain mired in poverty?” (business reporter, Business Daily,
Kenya).Other respondents, however, believed that the poor salaries of
journalists eliminated the possibility of market manipulation and
insider trading: “Most of us have access to market intelligence in terms
of the local stock exchange, but lack the capital base to use that
information to our advantage” (business reporter, Financial Gazette,
Zimbabwe).
Disclosure
A related question is whether journalists should disclose their
financial interests, for example ownership of shares in a company they
cover. Most business journalism ethics codes, if not banning share
ownership outright, require that journalists disclose their interests
either to editors or, in some cases, to their audience (Tambini, 2010). In
the case of codes of ethics analyzed for this study, journalists are
expected to declare only gifts received at corporate functions. Most
codes are silent on the issue of share ownership except the Business
Daily, which bans share ownership. Business Day requires journalists to
disclose share ownership to readers at the bottom of an article.
Respondents felt, however, that disclosure rules would be ineffective
because they are difficult to police:
422
Business journalism ethics in Africa
424
Business journalism ethics in Africa
Conclusion
While each of the financial newspapers in this study had ethical
policies in place, and journalists and editors recognized the importance
of ethical behavior in the field of business journalism, there was, in
some respects, a disconnect between policy and practice. Ethics codes
reflect the aspirations of newspaper publishers and journalists, rather
than actual practices. While journalists were aware of the existence of
ethical policies, they were not always familiar with the details of those
policies, and in some cases, such as restrictions on share ownership, not
always in agreement with them. All three ethics codes included
measures to prevent bribe-taking, but in two of the countries –
Zimbabwe and Kenya – it seemed that brown envelope journalism is
an accepted practice, and in South Africa, related practices such as
freebies and sponsored travel are ubiquitous. This is due to the
precarious economic basis of the news organizations, which do not
have the resources to pay journalists competitive salaries or to fund
travel for journalistic purposes. The link between economic
circumstances and ethical behavior is illustrated by the fact that
journalists in Zimbabwe and Kenya seemed more tolerant of brown
envelope journalism and related practices than their counterparts in
South Africa, where media organizations are far more profitable and
journalists, as a consequence, better remunerated. Unethical journalism
cannot be justified by economic circumstances, but neither can it be
addressed without addressing the economic basis and status of news
organizations and journalists.
A second aspect that needs to be addressed in order to improve
ethical behavior in the business media is monitoring and policing of
ethics rules. At all three newspapers in this study, respondents admitted
that monitoring was not taking place and that editors relied on the
integrity and honesty of journalists. Experience has shown, however,
that unethical practices thrive when ethics rules are not monitored and
enforced (Chari, 2009; Ndangam, 2006). Lack of resources was again
cited as the main reason for the absence of effective monitoring.
Lack of enforcement of ethical rules, together with the economic
circumstances of journalists, result in a pervasive and tolerated culture
of unethical behavior, even among senior editorial executives. This was
evident to some extent from responses of journalists in Kenya and
Zimbabwe, and, to a lesser extent, in South Africa. Incidents were
cited, for example, of pressure being brought to bear by senior editorial
executives on behalf of advertisers; share ownership rules being
426
Business journalism ethics in Africa
References
Banda, F. (2010). When journalism is a blunt knife. Rhodes Journalism
Review, 29, 10–12.
Brand, R. (2010). The business of business news: South Africa’s
financial press and the political press. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism
Studies, 31(1), 24–41.
Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis.
In D. Berkowitz (Ed.) (1997), Social meaning of news (pp. 107–22).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chari, T. (2007). Rethinking ethical issues in African media. African
Identities, 5(1), 39–60.
Chari, T. (2009). Ethical challenges facing Zimbabwean media in the
context of the Internet. Global Media Journal: African Edition, 3(1).
Retrieved on 22 November 2010, from http://sun025.sun.ac.za/
portal/page/portal/Arts/Departemente1/Joernalistiek/
Global%20Media%20Journal/Global%20Media%20Journal%20-
%20Files/8C985F826DA95119E04400144F47F004.
Duncan, J. (2010). Media accountability systems in Africa.
Unpublished report, UNESCO/Highway Africa Website
Development Project.
Gavin, N.T. (Ed.) (1998). The economy, media and public knowledge.
London: Leicester University Press.
Harber, A. (2010, July 7). It’s up to the ANC and the media to stop the
rot, Business Day. Retrieved on 22 November 2010, from http://
www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=114003.
Hydén, G. (2006). African politics in comparative perspective. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kareithi, P., and Kariithi, N. (Eds.). (2005). Untold stories: Economics and
business journalism in African media. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand
University Press.
Kariithi, N. (2002, summer). Economics and business journalism in
Africa. Nieman Reports, pp. 26–27.
Kariithi, N. (2003). Business and economics journalism. In
Encyclopaedia of International Media and Communications (pp. 153–
61). San Francisco: Academic Press.
428
Business journalism ethics in Africa
Roush, C. (2006). Profit and losses: Business journalism and its role in
society. Illinois: Marion Street Press.
Rumney, R. (2009, September). Caught in a blamestorm. Rhodes
Journalism Review 29. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism.
Journalism, 2(2), 149–70.
Steyn, L. (2010). TV channel gets R50 million from Gauteng. News
article, Mail & Guardian Online. Retrieved on 24 August 2010, from
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-04-01-tv-channel-gets-r50m-from-
gauteng.
Tambini, D. (2009). What is financial journalism for? Ethics and
responsibilities in a time of crisis and change. London: Polis.
Tambini, D. (2010). What are financial journalists for? Journalism
Studies, 11(2), 158–74.
Thompson, T. (Ed). (2000). Writing about business: The new Columbia
Knight-Bagehot guide to economics and business journalism. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Ward, S.J.A. (2006). The invention of journalism ethics: The path to
objectivity and beyond. New York: McGill Queens’s University
Press.
White, R.A. (2010). The moral foundations of media ethics in Africa.
Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 31(1), 42–67.
Abstract
In the past few decades, the proportion of business news compared to general news has increased tremendously
across all media platforms in Africa. While the critical role played by business journalism is recognised, little is
known about the people who write and report such news. Most studies on business journalism have tended to
focus on analysing the content of business news, rather than the specific processes through which business
journalists are socialised and trained. The findings of this study are drawn mainly from in-depth interviews with
business reporters and editors at two leading newspapers in Malawi, The Daily Times and The Nation. Two
major findings emerge from the study data. First, business journalists vary in their educational and professional
backgrounds, as well as the reasons for working on this beat. Second, the majority of them have no prerequisite
formal education and training in business journalism. The study recommends that business reporting should
become an integral component of journalism education and training programmes in order to adequately prepare
journalists for effective coverage of business issues.
Key words: business journalism, education, mentoring, training, socialisation, specialisation,
Introduction
The professional socialisation and training of business journalists remains an underdeveloped area of research in
Africa. A lot of studies conducted so far have tended to devote more effort to content analysis, examining how
the business press report specific issues and events. For example, Kariithi and Kareithi (2007) did a critical
discourse analysis of media coverage of the anti-privatisation strike of 2002 in South Africa, Kula (2004)
investigated the coverage of inflation news by the South African print media while Manda and Chirwa (2007)
examined budget reporting trends in Malawian media. Considering the increased growth and importance of
business reporting across media platforms in Africa in the last decade and the contributions business journalists
make to the debate surrounding the political economy of host nations, research on the professional socialisation
and training of such group of specialised reporters remains a worthwhile area of inquiry.
The present study explores the professional socialisation and training of business reporters in Malawi. The
objective is to understand the process by which people become specialised business news reporters. The study
addressed the following key questions:
1. What motivates journalists in Malawi to venture into business reporting?
2. What processes do the journalists follow to become specialised reporters?
3. What mentoring process do they undergo?
4. What education and training do the journalists possess?
5. What education and training do the reporters believe is needed to effectively report about business?
Business journalism as a sub-field of news reporting
Business journalism refers to all reporting that is written not only about businesses but also on the economy
(Roush 2006: 8). According to Kariithi (2003), three closely related forms of journalistic endeavour; business,
economics and financial journalism are often used interchangeably even though there are distinctions between
them.
181
© Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijbssnet.com
Economics journalism refers to the coverage of national and international economic events and issues, business
journalism comprises the coverage of local economic issues in an in-depth fashion while financial journalism
provides a micro level perspective into financial markets (Kariithi, 2003:153). In this study the term business
journalism is used to refer to all the three.
Roush (2004:2) observes that there is no more important work in today’s media than that of a business journalist
and as such vibrant business reporting is being encouraged in emerging democracies and emerging economies.
Welles (2001:18) contend that this genre of journalism has acquired special status, as manifested in special
newspaper sections, television and radio programmes as well as specialised publications and special editorial
teams tailored to business. Business journalism has thus emerged as a distinct and legitimate news reporting sub-
field with a number of specific practices and norms of its own (Kjaer and Slaata, 2007:38).
Business journalism in Malawi
Although business news has been a main offering of Malawian news media for many years, the institutionalisation
of business reporting as a specialised area of journalism practice is a relatively new development. It dates back to
just about twenty years ago. As Chimombo and Chimombo (1996) put it, the defunct The Malawi Financial Post
and The Malawi Financial Observer emerged in the early 1990s as potential business news outlets, but they
contained more political than financial news. Thus, to date Malawi does not have a free-standing business
newspaper. Instead, business news is carried as a section in a general newspaper or as a supplement or pull out
The prominence of business reporting in Malawi emerged following the adoption of liberal politics in 1994. Since
the end of one-party rule, issues of the economy and people’s welfare have dominated political and civic debate.
People have become more conscious of the performance of the economy and how it affects their livelihood and
survival. In national elections, for example, sound economic management and improvement in living standards
have become dominant campaign themes of various political parties and candidates. Manda and Chirwa (2007:2)
argue that business reporting creates space for public debate on the national economy through the involvement of
citizens in matters of formulating, implementing and monitoring of the national budget. Besides focusing on the
national budget, business reporting in Malawi has been equally concerned with public accounting, corporate
governance and economic performance of the private sector among other issues.
Nevertheless, Malawi, like many other African countries, lacks a well developed business journalism practice.
This could be attributed to two major factors. Firstly, the one-party rule which prevailed for 30 years after
independence did not allow any journalism schools to operate (Chimombo and Chimombo, 1996:6). Formal
journalism education and training was only introduced after the adoption of multi-party politics in 1994.
Secondly, the existing journalism education models emphasise training for general reporting (Jamieson, 2005:
29). Since there had been no formal training and education for business reporting, general reporters routinely
transform into business journalists. This situation called for an investigation into the socialisation and training of
business reporters considering that business journalism poses its own unique and complex challenges.
Business reporting at The Daily Times and the Nation newspapers
The Daily Times and The Nation are the only two daily newspapers in Malawi. The Daily Times is the oldest
newspaper in Malawi. It was established in the early 1960’s by the family of the country’s first post-
independence president, the late Dr. Hastings Kamuzu Banda. The Nation, owned by late veteran politician, Aleke
Banda, was established in 1993 during the transition from single party to multi party political dispensation. The
Daily Times and The Nation define and dominate business reporting in Malawi. The two newspapers were
appropriate for the study because they covered more business issues and in greater detail than other media
organisations in Malawi. Furthermore, they were significant as they had set up business desks alongside other
regular news beats such as politics, entertainment and sports.
The papers had deployed full time staff for the business desks both at their main offices in the commercial city of
Blantyre and at regional bureaus in Lilongwe and Mzuzu. They also enjoyed the highest circulation and
readership in Malawi. At the time of the study, The Daily Times and The Nation had a circulation of 12,000 and
15,000 respectively (MISA 2012:47). The business desk at The Nation was set up in 1995 and in 1996 for The
Daily Times. The Daily Times has a four page section of business news daily with a sixteen page The business
Times pull out on Wednesday. The Nation on its part carries four pages of business news daily except on Sunday
and publishes its eight-page supplement on Thursday.
182
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5 No. 3; March 2014
183
© Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijbssnet.com
“Recruiting staff for the business desk is a challenge because most of the media training institutions do not offer
specialised training for business reporting. So usually most of the people that we have hired are those that got
basic training in journalism then probably had chances later on for further studies specifically in business and
economics news coverage. Most of the time we target those who have had training outside their normal or basic
journalism training, and also had opportunities to do short courses in business and economics reporting. In
addition we usually also look for some work experience, those who have been on the business desk before.”
(Interview, October, 2012)
On the other hand, editor of The Nation said for business reporting the paper usually targeted people with a
relevant first degree and at least with some knowledge of economics or business. The editor observed that it was
ideal to target those with an economics degree in economics because this knowledge was vital, citing an example
of one of the paper’s business reporters who was an economics graduate from Chancellor College, a constituent
college of the University of Malawi. Editor of The Daily Times said his organisation had tried the approach of
recruiting economics or business studies graduates since it would have been the best option. But he pointed out
that such graduates were usually not settled because they could get more competitive salaries elsewhere. He said
economics and business studies graduates found lucrative jobs elsewhere rather than in the media. He said, when
they came to the media, it was because they had nowhere to go at that particular time. This editor observed that
unless remuneration and work conditions in the media improved to become competitive as those offered by the
corporate and financial sector, the chances of maintaining economics and business studies graduates were
minimal. Editor of The Nation agreed with his Daily Times counterpart that it was not achievable to get
economics and business graduates as they were mostly unwilling to work in the newsroom but instead preferred
the corporate world where salaries and conditions were attractive. He added that it had to be understood that these
economics and business graduates were not in principal professional journalists by training but just happened to
be suited to journalism, hence their primary target was the financial, business and corporate sectors.The editor’s
advocating for economics or business graduates as the most ideal for business reporting was contradicted by a
very experienced business reporter at The Daily Times who argued that he would give priority to an experienced
reporter to learn on the job over an economics graduate turned business reporter. To him, the economics or
business graduate would fail to communicate information to the masses. He added that the experienced journalist
would look at issues with the eye of an ordinary person. Another reporter at The Nation supported this position
that economists or business studies graduates were not best suited for business reporting noting:
“It is true that some people who are economists have ended up being good business journalists. But you also have
got cases around where you find people who have never been trained as economists ending up being good
business journalists. I think we should first understand who a journalist is; a journalist is a communicator whether
it be in science or politics. So in the case of business reporting, it is anybody else who is interested in reporting
business news, what is important is to equip them to understand the issues. To me, it is better to have an
experienced journalist rather than a graduate economist to report on business. Even if one does not have a
background in economics or business studies but if you have an interest in that particular sector then you can turn
into a good communicator of those issues. What is important is to be good communicators and interpreters of the
issues.”(Interview, October, 2012)
From the sentiments of the two reporters, it can be argued that the position of editors on recruiting business and
economics graduates for business reporting seems idealistic. What was more practical and manifested on the
ground was that journalism experience surpassed all other considerations. Of the nine business reporters
interviewed during the study only one had a degree in economics. This indicated that while economics or business
qualification was preferred, it was not attainable and that journalism experience was the most used criterion for
recruiting staff for business reporting. The situation at the two Malawian newspapers seemed to agree with Reed
and Lewin (2005: 14), who noted that it helped if the reporters had experience covering other types of stories
before moving over to business, as experienced reporters needed less direction while greener reporters required
more mentoring. Nearly four decades ago, Turnstall (1971:24) also made similar observation that in specialist
reporting preference had always been on general experience and competence rather than specialised knowledge.
Induction and mentoring newly recruited business reporters
Editors of the two newspapers under study agreed that mentoring for newly deployed reporters on the business
desk was an important requirement to have the people orientated to the expectations and mode of operations on
that particular desk.
184
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5 No. 3; March 2014
Editor of The Daily Times however observed that sometimes formal mentoring was not always possible,
especially if the new person came to the desk when more experienced reporters were busy. In that situation, he
confessed, de-briefing and mentoring was sometimes overlooked and the new person was left to swim on their
own. He said what would be done instead was to constantly give feedback to the concerned person. He noted for
example that if there was something which could be improved on, they would be advised accordingly. The editor
said the responsibility of mentoring would be left to the business editor because he possessed specialised
knowledge in that field. Editor of The Nation said the process of mentoring on the business beat was the same for
reporters on other desks The only difference was that as part of the mentoring process they were encouraged to
read widely literature on business and economics to keep themselves abreast with latest developments. The two
editors admitted that induction and mentoring of new recruits was compromised because they were not governed
by any written rules but carried out as routine practices when necessary.
However, most reporters expressed concern over lack of mentoring and socialisation at the time they joined the
business desk. One reporter of The Nation explained that he was not mentored or inducted in any way on business
reporting as the experienced reporters were then not available to do so. A reporter of The Daily Times said in the
absence of formal mentoring in the early days, he familiarised himself through reading articles in international
business newspapers and magazines. Two reporters of The Daily Times who had the privilege of being inducted
and mentored admitted it was a useful process that nurtured and sharpened their skills.
These findings revealed that while mentoring was an essential process in the professional socialisation of business
reporters, it had not been carried out to the expected levels or in some cases not at all. Most reporters interviewed
lamented how they had struggled to cope with demands of the business desk and ended up making mistakes in
their writing which could have been avoided if they were formally and properly inducted and mentored. Most
newly recruited reporters on the business desk said they had been left to find ways of doing things on their own.
Education and training of business reporters
In this study, education was used to refer to academic qualification that emphasise theoretical aspects while
training denoted qualification that focussed on practical elements of a profession. Within training, a distinction
was also made between short term courses pursued at workshops and seminars, and long-term courses leading to
award of a certificate, diploma or degree. In terms of their formal education, findings revealed that the highest
academic qualification for two reporters of The Nation and three of The Daily Times was The Malawi School
Certificate of Education (an equivalent of British GSCE O-level certificate). One reporter of The Daily Times had
a diploma in journalism, one reporter of The Nation possessed a bachelors degree in economics while two
reporters (one for each paper) possessed bachelors degree in journalism.( Refer to Table 1)
Table 1: Academic Qualifications
Qualification Number of people
(a)M.S.C.E. (British GSCE O- level equivalent) 5
(b) Diploma 1
(c) Bachelors degree in journalism 2
(d) Bachelors degree in economics 1
The academic qualifications as shown by table above indicate that most business editors ventured into business
reporting unprepared without any pre-requisite knowledge and expertise.
Professional Qualifications
All the journalists interviewed indicated having no initial exposure or background knowledge in business or
economics except one who had a bachelors degree in economics. The rest only possessed qualifications in general
journalism ranging from certificate to a bachelors degree (Refer to Table 2).
Table 2: Professional qualifications in business/economics
Qualification Number of people
(a) Certificate in business /economics 0
(b) Diploma in business /economics 0
(c) Bachelors degree in business /economics 1
(d) Masters degree in business/economics 0
185
© Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijbssnet.com
It was because of knowledge gap in business and economics as depicted by the table above that most reporters
indicated that short term business reporting courses were critical for them to meet the demands of the beat.
Professional short courses
All reporters interviewed indicated that they had attended short-term professional training at either a workshop or
seminar. Topics covered during such training included the following: reporting corruption, corporate governance,
budget reporting and analysis, reporting business news, globalisation, understanding the global financial crisis,
and reporting the national economy. Most of the workshops and seminars, it was observed took place locally and
organised by institutions such as the University of Malawi, the Reserve Bank of Malawi, National Bank of
Malawi, Standard Bank, Malawi Revenue Authority, Office of the Director of Public Procurement, Economics
Association of Malawi, Malawi Confederation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Malawi Stock Exchange,
Malawi Economic Justice Network and Institute of Internal Auditors, and the local offices of international
institutions such as the World Bank, Canadian International Development Agency and the United States Agency
for International Development ( USAID). Some reporters indicated to have attended such short term courses
outside the country organised by international institutions such as the Reuters Foundation, European Union,
African Development Bank, Reserve Bank of South Africa, and Johannesburg Stock Exchange among others.
The two editors admitted that due to cash flow problems it became difficult for the media institutions to sponsor
reporters for professional training in Malawi or outside the country. They instead encouraged reporters to seize
opportunities of fully-funded training. They said in some cases their organisations would meet part of the costs
such as transportation expenses when the tuition and other costs were paid for. But they emphasised that the
initiative had to be with the reporter to identify and apply for a course and only inform management should they
needed support.
In-house training
Editor of The Daily Times added that apart from training offered by other institutions within and outside the
country, in-house training is sometimes organised. This usually involved inviting officials of business and
economics institutions who would make presentations to the business reporters. He said such presentations
supplemented the mentoring and socialisation that took place on the desk and had proved very useful. He
explained how it was done:
“We have in the past tried to call people and organisations to come and make presentations on particular areas of
business and economics as one way of improving the performance of our business reporters. For example the
Economics Association of Malawi would do some training for journalists on specifically how they want people to
cover economics issues, the Bankers Association of Malawi would give a briefing on how to handle issues
concerning banks, the Malawi Stock Exchange would also hold a training session specifically on how best they
could be covered. So business reporters benefit from such presentations” (Interview, October 2012)
The above explanation showed that the media organisations complemented efforts of external organisations in
providing training to business reporters. All reporters were unanimous in acknowledging the significance of long
and short term professional courses to their business reporting careers. One reporter of The Nation put it that:
“When I was going into business reporting I did not have the much needed knowledge and experience, therefore
such training have been like eye openers because they helped me understand issues in business and I think they
have helped to shape me to where I am now” ( Interview, October 2012)
Most reporters said the courses exposed them to new business knowledge, and provided new insight and helped
them gain confidence. In one unique case, as part of professional training, one reporter of The Daily Times said he
had benefited from a six month internship at the business desk of The Chicago Tribune in the United States of
America
Membership to professional organisations
Socialisation and training through membership to professional association was also mentioned by the business
reporters as another useful intervention. One such body was the Association of Business Journalists (ABJ). In the
words of a reporter of The Nation who claimed was a founding member of ABJ had contributed tremendously to
the quality of business reporting:
186
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5 No. 3; March 2014
“The association has done an incredible job to enhance the professionalisation of business journalists through
exchange of ideas and public talks where professionals in economics, business and financial sectors present
working papers and discuss issues. In addition members have benefited from the association as a forum for
networking, interaction, knowledge sharing and discussion of issues to develop business journalism profession,
lobbying and negotiating with organisations for training.” (Interview, October, 2012)
In addition to the local organisation, other reporters said they were members of international professional bodies
such as the African Economics Editors Network through which they had benefited in form of training, networking
and sharing of knowledge and skills with other reporters across the African continent.
Education and training the reporters needed
Despite benefiting from short and long term professional training, the reporters explained that they wished they
could undergo more training to enhance their skills especially in aspects they faced challenges. The areas
identified included: monetary policy, international financial market systems, globalisation, interpreting national
budget, bond and commodity markets, interpreting statistics, and analysing company financial statements. This
showed that while the business reporters had undergone some professional training, there existed knowledge gap
that required more exposure and training. In a study of 18 west coast newspaper editors and reporters in the
United States of America carried out over a decade ago, nearly all agreed that business journalists needed classes
or training in business and economics to do their jobs well (Ludwig 2002:129). Going by the study findings, the
scenario in the United States appear to hold true to the Malawi situation. As articulated by reporters of the two
newspapers under study, their exposure to different forms of professional training had significantly improved their
capacity to cover business. They indicated that they needed to take classes in business and economics to provide
them with tools necessary to do their work properly, although they were mixed responses on what form the
courses should take and the specific areas or topics.
Discussion of Findings
Findings of the study established that for most business journalists at the two daily newspapers, there was no
initial motivation to venture into business reporting. Most of them began their careers as general reporters and few
had considered the choice of business journalism as a career option as there was no initial passion and inspiration.
For some it was a matter of moving away from their usual routines especially political reporting while others were
forced by circumstances, for example shortage of personnel on the desk. This showed that most of them were to
say the least dragged into it for various reasons. The study also revealed that the business reporters had different
educational and professional backgrounds and experiences. Although the editors of the two daily newspapers
under study said they preferred business or economics graduates, most of their business journalists at that time did
not possess those qualifications. The majority of them had no formal training in business or economics and had to
be exposed to the field through short and long term on the job training.
An essential outcome of the study was the recognition that training was one of the central pillars of the
professional socialisation of business reporters. Kariithi (1995:376) puts it that studies of how African journalists
cope with demands of business journalism have found that even without considering the impact of other factors,
the writers lacked technical skills for comprehensive reporting and analysis of business issues. The way the
business reporters were socialised was reflected on the kind of content they produced. Since an understanding of
business and economics issues is a pre-requisite for effective dissemination and interpretation of information to
the public, business journalists required to be trained. The study revealed that there were a handful of trained
business reporters, hence the added need for more training. However, specialisation in business reporting had not
fully taken root among Malawian journalists. It was noted that lack of adequate specialised training was
particularly cardinal. Local institutions that offer journalism education and training did not have specialised
programmes targeting business reporting and therefore most of them became business reporters by need other
than ability.
To this effect, the Department of Journalism and Media Studies at the Polytechnic, a constituent college of the
University of Malawi, as a key journalism education and training institution, needed to strengthen its curriculum
to accommodate the training of business reporters. The department’s revised curriculum of 2010 which
incorporated some business journalism modules was a move in the right direction. As Pardue (2004) observed,
until specialised training in business reporting was integrated into journalism programs, a gap would remain
between what editors needed and what poorly prepared graduates would deliver.
187
© Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.ijbssnet.com
But more could be done by the University of Malawi and other private journalism and media training institutions
by either introducing a speciality programme in business reporting or by allowing specialising from third year of
the current general degree programme. Meanwhile, the two daily newspapers in Malawi should continue to
provide professional training opportunities through which their business reporters could hone their skills. Also not
to be underestimated would be the value of what journalists could learn on the job. As the study showed, most of
the business journalists joined the beat without any previous knowledge. Therefore induction and mentoring
needed to be given special priority. Interviews with reporters and editors attested that on the job training remained
a neglected aspect. Therefore induction and mentoring needed to be strengthened and encouraged. Further, the
media organisations should hire economists or business studies graduates and train them as business journalists.
In the process, their in-depth knowledge of economics and business coupled with an understanding of news
reporting would combine to making business news more interesting to the public.
Areas for Further Research
This study was an exploratory enquiry into the socialisation and training of business reporters in Malawi. The
findings and interpretations presented in this paper are only the beginning of an important area of study worth
pursuing. A lot of questions still exist about business journalism in Malawi and these could be answered by
embarking on further studies within the sub-field. While this study provided a good snapshot to understanding
socialisation and training of a group of specialist reporters at the two daily newspapers, it was narrow in scope. A
broader enquiry could be undertaken nationwide targeting business journalists in other newspapers, radio and
television stations, as well as magazines. Also an audience reception study could be conducted to investigate
public engagement with business news. Such an enquiry would seek answers to the following questions: how does
the Malawi public understand and use business news? How is business news evaluated by the audience? How
much does it contribute to the formation and development of public opinion on the economy? How does it
influence civic discussion on other issues affecting society?
Conclusion
A lot of studies have been conducted on business journalism but mainly analysing the content of business
reporting. There is however dearth of research targeting people responsible for writing and producing business
news. This study is but a small contribution in that regard as it examined the professional socialisation and
training of business reporters at two leading newspapers in Malawi. It has provided a rich picture of how such
reporters became what they are. Findings of this study would be useful to editors in needs assessment process for
hiring and training business reporters, and for journalism schools in the training of such reporters. It is also hoped
that this study would contribute to a knowledge base journalism scholars can draw from when understanding and
interrogating the socialisation and training of business journalists in an African context in general and Malawi in
particular.
188
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5 No. 3; March 2014
References
Chimombo, S. and Chimombo, M. (1996) The Culture of Democracy: Language, Literature, the Arts and Politics
in Malawi, 1992-1994. Zomba: WASI Publications.
Jamieson, R. (2005) ‘Business Reporting in Malawi Media’, in Kareithi, P. and Kariithi, N (eds) Untold Stories:
Economics and Business Journalism in African Media, pp 29-31. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
Kareithi, P. (2005). ‘Rethinking the African Press: Journalism and the Democratic Process’, in Kareithi, P. and
Kariithi, N (eds.) Untold Stories: Economics and Business Journalism in African Media. pp 2-15.
Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
Kariithi, N. 1995. “Questioning the Policy maker: The Role of Mass Media in Shaping Africa’s Economic
Future”, in Okigbo, C. (ed.) Media and Sustainable Development in Africa.pp 140-166. Nairobi: African
Council for Communication Education.
Kariithi, N. (2003) ‘Business and Economics Journalism’, Encyclopaedia of International Media and
Communications. Vol.1. pp 153-161. San Francisco: Academic Press.
Kjaer, P. and Slaata, T. (2007) Mediating Business: The Expansion of Business Journalism. Copenhagen:
Copenhagen Business School Press.
Kula, M. (2004) How the South African Print Media Cover Economics News: A Study of Inflation News in Four
Newspapers, 1999-2001. MA Thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
Ludwig, M. (2002) ‘Business Journalists Need Specialised Finance Training’, Newspaper Research Journal, Vol.
23 (2): 129-141.
Marchette, D. (2005) ‘Sub-fields of Specialised Journalism’, in Benson, R and Neveu, E (eds.) Bourdieu and the
Journalistic Field, pp 64-79. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Manda, L. and Chirwa, W. (2007) Whose Voice Matters: Trends in Budget Reporting in Malawi. Lilongwe:
Canadian International Development Agency-CIDA
Media Institute of Southern Africa, (2012) So This is Democracy: State of Media Freedom in Southern Africa.
Windhoek: MISA
Pardue, M. (2004) ‘Most Business Editors Find News Reporters Unprepared’, in Newspaper Research Journal,
Vol. 25(3): 66-76.
Reed, R. and Lewin, G. (2005) Covering Business: A Guide to Aggressively Reporting on Commerce and
Developing a Powerful Business Beat. Illinois: Marion Street Press.
Roush, C. (2004) Show Me the Money: Writing Business and Economics News for Mass Communication.
London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Roush, C. (2006) Profit and Losses: Business Journalism and its Role in Society. Illinois: Marion Street Press
Stake. R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Sparks, C. and Splichal, S. (1989) “Journalistic education and professional socialisation”. Gazette( 43): 31-52
Turnstall, T. (1971) Journalists at Work: Special Correspondents; Their News Organisations, News Sources and
Competitor Colleagues, London: Constable and Company
Welles, C. (2001) ‘Writing about Business and the Economy’, in Thompson, T (ed) Writing about Business . pp
1-12. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wimmer, R and Dominick J, (2003) Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing
Company.
189
554167
research-article2014
JOU0010.1177/1464884914554167Journalism
Article
Journalism
Antonis Kalogeropoulos
University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Claes de Vreese
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Erik Albæk
University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Abstract
In the wake of the financial crisis, journalists were criticized for failing in their coverage
of the economy: The claim was that they had failed in their duty as watchdogs. The aim
of this article is to examine to what extent journalists fulfill their role as watchdogs
when covering business news, in light of this criticism. Given the prevalence of the
watchdog ideal in journalism and the lessons learned during the financial crisis, we
expect journalists to act equally critically toward business and political news. Based on
a systematic content analysis of business and political news in the five largest Danish
newspapers, we find that politicians and business actors are covered with a similar
tone. We conclude that journalists do fulfill their watchdog role when it comes to both
business and politics. The differences in coverage and the implications of this adherence
to the watchdog ideal are also discussed.
Corresponding author:
Antonis Kalogeropoulos, Center for Journalism, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230
Odense M, Denmark.
Email: [email protected]
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
2 Journalism
Keywords
Business coverage, business news, content analysis, economic news, financial crisis,
watchdog journalism
Introduction
Ever since the dawn of the international crisis in 2008,1 the media worldwide have been
criticized for failing to exercise skepticism about what was done by those in political and
financial power and therefore failing, as the fourth estate, in their duty to the public
(Marron et al., 2010). For example, Manning (2013) claims that financial journalism
failed to alert for the sings of the crisis by practicing a simplistic model of monitoring.
He also argues that public relations (PR) consultants made financial institutions more
competitive in exercising control in information flows. Empirical studies that analyzed
media content before the 2008 crisis have shown that the media were paying attention
only to some sectors of the economy (which did not include debt and derivative markets)
and that their evaluation was not very critical (Starkman, 2009; Tett, 2009). Other schol-
ars have criticized financial journalists for being unaware of the institutional framework
in which they operate (Tambini, 2010b) for not being trained and knowledgeable enough
(Davis, 2007; Doyle, 2006) or paying too little attention to economic details (Schiffrin
and Fagan, 2013). Starkman (2009), in his study on American newspapers, found that
although financial journalists did give some warnings about investment and banking
issues between 2000 and 2003, after 2004 such warnings and investigative stories were
missing. In Denmark, it was argued that the media did not function as watchdogs during
the financial crisis because there was no political conflict between the government and
the opposition (Andersen, 2011).
The aim of this article is to determine to what extent journalists lived up to their role
as watchdogs when they covered economic news in 2012. In this way, we will be able to
assess if this ‘failure of the watchdog-critique’ that was expressed toward journalists at
the onset of the crisis is legitimate in times of a full blown crisis. We do not expect this
to be the case – in fact, we expect journalists to act as watchdogs within the field of busi-
ness news to the same extent they do when they cover political news. Lessons taught by
the financial crisis clearly amplified the need for journalists to be alert and cautious of
the acts of not only politicians but also business actors – the major Icelandic banking
collapse and the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy are only two examples where journalists
could have exerted more critique vis-à-vis power holders. These lessons, combined with
all the criticism journalists have been exposed to and the importance that they attach to
the watchdog ideal, make us believe that journalists of today operate as watchdogs when
they cover both economic news and political news.
What is a watchdog?
The watchdog metaphor implies that the journalists act as guards toward those groups in
society who have power. At all times, watchdogs should represent the citizens, be suspi-
cious of potential threats and hold the powerful elites such as government and public offi-
cials accountable (Berry, 2009; Donohue et al., 1995; Franklin et al., 2005; Wahl-Jorgensen,
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 3
2007). Franklin et al. (2005) specifies the watchdog role more clearly by referring to three
assumptions:
First, the media are essentially autonomous; second journalism acts in the public interest
looking after the welfare of the general public rather than that of society’s dominant groups; and
third, that the power of the news media is such that they are able to influence dominant social
groups to the benefit of the public. (p. 274)
According to these assumptions, the watchdog is autonomous, represents the public and
has the power to challenge those in power (Patterson, 1998). Watchdogs are also critical
and adversarial in their coverage, critical in a context of political competitiveness where
actors are open to evaluation (Norris, 2000: 29). Additionally, watchdogs are per defini-
tion objective; they do not represent any specific interests, but instead, they present dif-
ferent interests and opposing views in a news story in order to be as unbiased as possible
(Skovsgaard et al., 2012). The importance of fulfilling the objective watchdog role is
underlined by the dedication journalists express toward it. In a research conducted by
Skovsgaard et al. (2012), 45 percent of Danish journalists agree that it is ‘very important’
for journalists to be as objective as possible and not to take a stand on who is right in a
conflict. They also believe that they should be equally critical toward both sides in a
dispute (Skovsgaard et al., 2012).
But how does the watchdog operate in economic news – are watchdogs as fierce when
it comes to chasing business actors as they are when chasing politicians? We believe it is
crucial that journalists sound the alarm when some potential dangers toward society are
rising in the world of business – in exactly the same way they do when politicians jeop-
ardize the well-being of society. That is also why we adhere to the watchdog ideal as a
standard that should belong in business too. It has been argued that political journalists
face less pressure for PR, thus are more critical toward their actors (Reich, 2011). That is
why the coverage of politicians can serve as a standard to which the coverage of business
actors can be compared. This question seems more important than ever, since the power
of business actors has become very clear in the wake of the financial crisis. For such a
comparison to be made, it is desirable to distinguish between economic news focusing on
either ‘political news’ or ‘business news’,2 in order to see how the journalists fulfill their
role as watchdogs when it comes to, for instance, actors and issues covered.
Prior research on how business news is covered is ambiguous. It has been claimed that
the American news media have a pro-market bias (Herman, 2002). Likewise, in a case
study of how business crime is framed in the British media, Allen and Savigny (2012)
demonstrate that the media favor business interests over the public interest – business
actors had the voice in 45 percent of the articles analyzed, whereas government politicians
only had the voice in 7 percent of the cases. Furthermore, they argue that the media envi-
ronment is generally supportive of business interests and that those responsible for finan-
cial wrongdoings are able to get away with it (Allen and Savigny, 2012). Miller (2006)
also found that the American press preceded a public admission or an investigation in
exposing ‘accounting irregularities’ of companies in only less than a third of the cases.
Contradictorily, and based on observation and in-depth interviews, Doyle (2006) claims
that financial journalism is sometimes falsely stereotyped into using a pro-corporate bias
with the aim of portraying corporations and their activities positively. He also found that
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
4 Journalism
Hypotheses
Our first set of hypotheses is based on the expectation that journalists learned the lessons
from the early phases of the financial crisis, which demonstrated that both political deci-
sions on the economy and the behavior of business actors can have a great impact on citi-
zens’ lives. In addition, since journalists consider their watchdog function as very
important and are aware of their responsibility to keep a close eye on the power holders
in society, we find no reason why journalists should differentiate in their watchdog duty
when covering business actors or politicians. We believe that the basis of watchdog jour-
nalism is the similarity and balance in the coverage of different power holders in news
articles. A very positive and optimistic coverage of important business actors before and
during the first signs of the ongoing financial crisis has been claimed to be one of the
reasons behind it (Dickinson, 2010; Tambini, 2010b). The role of financial journalists
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 5
should contain not only ‘unearthing cases of fraud, but providing the balanced and skep-
tical news and comment that deflates bubbles and helps avoid market irrationality’
(Tambini, 2010b: 28). This would influence the way the economic climate is evaluated
in economic news, both political and business.
Thus, following our expectations and past research suggesting that the visibility of an
issue, the visibility of actors and its tone influence perceptions (De Vreese et al., 2006),
we focus on these aspects of the coverage and we build the following hypotheses:
H1a. The economic climate is evaluated similarly in economic news articles where
the main issue is a political issue as in articles where the main issue is a business
issue.
H1b. The economic climate is evaluated similarly in economic news articles where
the main actor is a politician as in articles where the main actor is a business actor.
H2. Politicians and business actors are evaluated in a similar manner in economic
news articles.
Our second set of hypotheses concerns the frames of the news stories in political and
business news. We base these two hypotheses on the assumption that a focus on conse-
quences implies a more interpretative and proactive view on news (De Vreese et al.,
2001; De Vreese, 2005). This is in accordance with the theory on the watchdog function
of journalism, since the whole point of alerting the public is to make the public aware of
the possible consequences of the actions of the political or financial power holders.
Moreover, we believe that the importance of the news criteria conflict (Galtung and
Ruge, 1965) is tied closely to watchdog journalism because the objectivity norm enhances
a focus on all sides in disputes. Again, since both political and business actors are power-
ful groups that work in very competitive environments, we expect similarity in the pres-
ence of both consequence frame and conflict frame:
H3. The presence and the evaluation of economic consequence frame is similar in
economic news articles where politicians and business actors are the main actors.
H4. The presence of conflict frame is similar in economic news articles where politi-
cians and business actors are the main actors.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
6 Journalism
Denmark. Thus, we expect this to be the case in the countries belonging to the Democratic
Corporatist model and not necessarily in countries which, for example, belong to the
polarized pluralist model where the professionalization is weaker between journalists
(Hallin and Mancini, 2004).
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 7
Measures
First, the main issue of each article was coded. If a story had more than one main issue,
then coders were asked to code first the one which was mentioned first. The issue catego-
ries were as follows: employment/unemployment, inflation, state debt and deficit, busi-
ness news and imports/exports, taxation, housing market, investment issues, interest
rates, individual economic stories, growth/recession (in a country), and others. These
categories were inspired by a similar study by Sanders et al. (1993).
Second, articles were classified as having ‘no evaluation’, ‘positive evaluation’, ‘neg-
ative evaluation’, and ‘mixed evaluation’ toward the economic climate. By mixed evalu-
ation we mean balanced exposure of favorable and unfavorable evaluations of the
economy. The coders were asked to measure the tone of the headline and the subheading
of the article when in doubt.10
Third, for each article, we coded the appearing actor. These could be specific persons,
institutions, a government, an organization, or a country. Up to five actors per article
were coded. By definition, actors needed to appear twice in the article in order to be
coded (verbally mentioned twice, verbally mentioned once and quoted once, verbally
mentioned once and depicted once). The actors in each article were coded by order of
appearance. Actors with several roles like ‘President of the euro group/Prime minister of
Luxembourg’ were coded according to how the journalists or the sources named them.
Broad categories of actors were ‘Business actors’, which included companies, business
people, and CEOs, ‘Political Actors’, which included Danish and international politi-
cians as well as governments and the European Union (EU) used as actors, ordinary citi-
zens, experts and credit-rating agencies, and interest organizations.
Fourth, coders were asked to code whether the actors were evaluated by anyone in the
story, a journalist or a source. Possible responses were ‘there is no evaluation of the
actor’, ‘there is a dominantly favourable evaluation of the actor’, ‘there is a mixed evalu-
ation of the actors’, and ‘there is a dominantly unfavourable evaluation of the actor’.
Fifth, coders were asked to evaluate whether a news article reports an event, a prob-
lem, or an issue in terms of the consequences it will have economically on an individual,
group institution, region, or country. Sixth and finally, coders evaluated whether a news
article put emphasis on disagreement between arguments, people, or institutions. These
framing items stem from De Vreese et al. (2001).
Results
The first part of this section covers the descriptive analysis of this study. During the ana-
lyzed period, we coded the issues discussed in economic news. Figure 1 shows that
corporate news was the most prevalent issue (21.5%) followed by unemployment and
employment (11.2%), and taxation (11.2%).
We merged (un)employment, debt/deficit, taxation, and growth/recession stories into
political issues. For business stories, we used housing market, investment issues, interest
rates, and corporate news. Others include Energy, Personal Economy, and other items not
counted in the first analysis. When combining the issues into two general categories,
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
8 Journalism
25
20
15
10
political issues and business issues, the presence of political issues and business issues in
the articles is similar (31.3%–34.8%), as seen in Figure 2.
Figure 3 shows the actors mentioned in the articles. In sum, business actors and com-
panies are the most present actors (27.2%), followed by international actors such as for-
eign politicians, EU or leaders of financial institutions like the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (20.3%), and Danish politicians (13.6%).
As far as the evaluation of the economic climate in the articles is concerned (Figure
4), 37.6 percent of the articles covered the economy negatively, as opposed to 20.7 per-
cent who were positive towards it. Of the articles, 29.7 percent did not contain any evalu-
ation of the climate.
In order to compare to what extent journalists act as watchdogs in both politics and
business news, we turn to the hypotheses. The first hypothesis (H1a) concerns the evalu-
ation of the economic climate in articles with different issues and expects that the eco-
nomic climate is evaluated similarly in articles where the main topic is either about
political issues or business issues (Table 1). This hypothesis is supported because no
significant differences are found in the presence or in the direction of the evaluation of
the economic climate across the two issue categories: χ2 (1, N = 325) = 1.109, p > .05 and
χ2 (2, N = 241) = 5.443 p > .05, respectively. In both political issues and business issues,
unfavorable coverage of the general economic climate is most prevalent.
The next hypothesis (H1b) concerns the evaluation of the economic climate when the
first actor is either a politician or business actor (Table 2) and expects that the evaluation
of the economic climate is evaluated similarly across these actors. This hypothesis is
supported because no significant differences are found in the presence or the direction of
the evaluation of the economic climate: χ2 (1, N = 301) = 0.340, p > .05, and χ2 (1,
N = 238) = 0.399, p > .05.
The second hypothesis (H2) predicts similarities in the way politicians and business
actors are evaluated by other actors or journalists in the article (Table 3). This hypothesis
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 9
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Business News Polical News Others
Figure 2. Main issue of the news articles divided into broader categories.
30
25
20
15
10
is partly supported because significant differences are found in the presence of evalua-
tions of different actors: χ2 (1, N = 301) = 3.957, p < .05, and no significant differences
appear when measuring the direction of the evaluations of actors: χ2 (2, N = 188) = 2.853,
p > .05.
The third hypothesis (H3) predicts similarities in the presence and the evaluation of
economic consequences frames when different actors appear in the articles. According to
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
10 Journalism
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
No Evaluaon Unfavourable Mixed Evaluaon Favourable
Evaluaon Evaluaon
Table 1. Presence and direction of the evaluation of the economic climate according to
different issues.
Articles including issues that did not fit into these categories were excluded from this analysis and this
explains the lower number of articles.
Table 2. Presence and direction of the evaluation of the economic climate according to
different actors.
No (%) Yes (%) Total (%) Unfavorable Mixed Favorable Total (%)
(%) (%) (%)
Political 22 78 100 (n = 167) 55 15 30 100 (n = 130)
Business 19 81 100 (n = 134) 52 17 31 100 (n = 108)
Chi square p-value: 0.56 p-value: 0.84
N = 301 N = 238
This analysis is based on 301 articles, because actors not belonging in either of these two categories are left
out.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 11
Table 3. Presence and direction of actors’ evaluations in political and business actors.
No (%) Yes (%) Total (%) Unfavorable Mixed (%) Favorable Total (%)
(%) (%)
Political 43 57 100 (n = 167) 53 22 25 100 (n = 96)
Business 31 69 100 (n = 134) 48 16 36 100 (n = 92)
Chi square p-value: 0.047 p-value: 0.24
N = 301 N = 188
This analysis is based on 301 articles, because actors not belonging in either of these two categories are left
out.
Table 4. Presence and direction of evaluations in economic consequence frame in articles with
different main actors.
No (%) Yes (%) Total (%) Unfavorable Mixed Favorable Total (%)
(%) (%) (%)
Political 37 63 100 (n = 167) 44 15 41 100 (n = 105)
Business 54 46 100 (n = 134) 38 19 43 100 (n = 62)
Chi square p-value: .004 p-value: 0.64
N = 301 N = 167
This analysis is based on 301 articles, because actors not belonging in either of these two categories are left
out.
Table 4, this hypothesis is partly supported. There were significant differences in the
presence of the economic consequences frame when politicians and business actors are
compared : χ2 (1, N = 301) = 8.300, p < .05. The economic consequence frame was present
in 46 percent of the articles with business actors as actors, while it was significantly more
present in articles with politicians as actors (63%). On the other hand, no significant dif-
ferences appeared in the evaluation of the economic consequences: χ2 (2, N = 167) = 0.882,
p > .05.
The last hypothesis examines the presence of conflict frames in articles with different
actors. According to Table 5, the hypothesis is not supported because significant differ-
ences are found: χ2 (1, N = 301) = 28.207, p < .05. A conflict frame was present in 53
percent of the articles with politicians as main actors, while it was present in 23 percent
of the articles with business actors as main actors.
Discussion
What do these results tell us about the watchdogs barking equally loud within the eco-
nomic and business news coverage? The descriptive analysis showed that corporate
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
12 Journalism
Table 5. Presence of conflict frame in articles with different main actors.
This analysis is based on 301 articles, because actors not belonging in either of these two categories are left
out.
news was the most covered issue followed by political issues such as (un)employment
and taxation. When looking at political news and business news, the difference between
the issues was more balanced and showed that journalists cover political and business
issues almost equally as far as the amount of the stories is concerned. This is a first indi-
cator that the media portray political and business issues in a similar manner. Likewise,
when it comes to actors present in the coverage, business actors are actually more visible
than politicians. What happens in the business world is by no means left unnoticed –
journalists do in fact pay a lot of attention to and give a lot of space in their columns to
what is at stake in the business world. These results are in line with Kjær’s et al. (2007:
146) findings which demonstrated that during the past decades, business and industry-
themed news and actors are gaining prevalence over economic news on governmental
policy in Nordic countries.
In terms of content, we find more similarities than differences in the coverage of
political news and business news. The economic climate was evaluated similarly across
articles about political and business issues, although the more favorable evaluations of
the economic climate were found for business issues (Table 1). This similarity might not
be surprising since the poor state of the economy favors a poor coverage of the economy
(Tumber, 1993). In terms of actors, we also found that the evaluations of the economy are
similar in the articles where business actors and politicians are main actors. In addition,
when we tested for potential differences between tabloids and broadsheets, we did not
find any significant differences in the direction of the coverage.
Differences were also found in the frames used. The ‘economic consequences’ and the
‘conflict’ frame were more present in politicians than in business actors. The differences
in the economic consequences frame are surprising, considering that both politicians and
business actors are powerful actors whose actions are potential threats to citizens and
need to be watched and scrutinized carefully by journalists. On the other hand, the fact
that journalists use the conflict frame more when it comes to politicians could be
explained with the obviousness of the other side in the dispute – it is easy for the journal-
ists to identify different views because clearly defined oppositions appear within politics
in terms of opposition parties, especially in a country with a multiparty coalition govern-
ment (Semetko and Valkenburg, 2000). This is more blurred within business.
But together, all the results suggest that journalists do keep a watching eye on the busi-
ness and evaluate them in a critical way which is a first indicator of a change of patterns.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 13
According to Tambini’s (2010a) findings, during the crisis financial journalists were not
dedicated to the watchdog role as much as their political counterparts. This was because
they were responding to what the audience or investors wanted to hear or because of con-
flicts of interest (Stein and Baines, 2012). We believe that this change is due to the finan-
cial crisis which served as a ‘critical juncture’ for media coverage. According to historical
institutionalists, a critical juncture or a crisis serves as an abrupt institutional change
(Hogan and Doyle, 2007). This can be a change in policies or patterns.
Since the financial crisis has led governments and corporations to reform, these
changes will be evident in the patterns of the media as an institution which played a
major role in the crisis too. The public discussion and demand for reform that followed
the financial crisis involved the role of the media in the society as a major player in this
crisis (Marron et al., 2010; Starkman, 2009; Tambini, 2010a, 2010b), and this has
alerted the field about its own responsibilities. We cannot be certain on whether this is
a temporary or a lasting change. On the one hand, other critical events such as the
Vietnam War or the Watergate scandal set a journalistic example as mentioned earlier
(Zelizer, 1992). On the other hand, the pressure of the companies’ public relations will
persist to push the journalists. Possible consequences of this change, if it is a lasting
one, could include changes in the audience and in the market. A more critical eye
toward business and the whole financial system may increase cynicism and distrust
(Cappella and Jamieson, 1997), but it would also protect the society from irregularities
(Tambini, 2010a). Finally, the Danish journalists did live up to our expectations accord-
ing to the Democratic corporatist model and showed professional standards of looking
at both sides of the story with a similar manner. These results may apply to Denmark
and to other countries belonging in the same media system model, but this may not be
the case for other countries. In countries of the Liberal model, such as the United
Kingdom, where the system is very competitive (Strömbäck and Shehata, 2007), more
commercial pressures apply. In countries of the polarized pluralist model, such as
Spain, it is common for media owners to use the media for their interests (Hallin and
Papathanassopoulos, 2002).
Last but not least, limitations may include the small time period of research or the sole
use of press (online and offline) and the large number of unidentified items in the issue
and actor identification questions. Future research needs to include a broader time period
so that a connection with the real world indicators will provide deeper insights between
businesses. In addition, TV and radio economic news should be included as well in order
to examine a more comprehensive image of the media coverage of the economy.
Funding
The study was funded by the independent research foundation of VELUX.
Notes
1. By crisis, we mean the financial crisis 2007–2008 which led to the collapse of financial insti-
tutions and of stock markets around the world. We believe that this crisis has consequences
until today through the European sovereign debt crisis.
2. For the purpose of this study, we understand political news as economic news which is focus-
ing on politically regulated issues such as taxation and employment, whereas business news is
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
14 Journalism
news focusing on issues that concern business actors like companies and business representa-
tives such as investment issues.
3. Infomedia is a database that archives all news articles from printed newspapers published by
different media outlets. The specific search in Infomedia is conducted by using search criteria
such as search words, date, and media outlet.
4. BERTA is a new archive of all news articles published online by different media outlets.
When using different search criteria such as search words, date, and media outlet, BERTA
will, like Infomedia, show the population of articles fulfilling these criteria.
5. The search words used were as follows: economy, balance of payments, gross domestic
product (GDP), inflation, housing market, taxation, debt, investment, interest rate, stock,
bank, consumption, savings, salary, loan, export, import, state of the market, employment,
unemployment, growth, recession. These words were chosen because an elaborative pretest
revealed that these words often appear in financial journalism.
6. This was tested through BERTA: An identical search was made with the following words
added: surplus, improvements, balance, upturn, hire, progress, deficit, decline, worsening,
imbalance, sack, downturn. This search resulted in 19,807 news articles.
7. We sampled randomly by using the software system http://www.random.org.
8. Eight articles were deleted from the sample because after the coding they appeared not to be
about economic news.
9. For the variable issue, percentage agreement is 78.2. For the variable actor, percentage agree-
ment is 61. For the evaluations (actor and climate) percentage agreement is 55.4. For the
variable economic consequence frame, percentage agreement is 71. For the variable conflict
frame percentage, agreement is 82.6.
10. If the tone of an article was absent or unclear from the heading or subheading or if the article
has an opposite tone than the header and subheading, the coders needed to count and compare
the number of different evaluations in the article.
References
Allen H and Savigny H (2012) Selling scandal or ideology? The politics of business crime cover-
age. European Journal of Communication 27(3): 278–290.
Andersen JG (2011) From the edge of the Abyss to Bonanza – And beyond. Danish Economy and
Economic Policies 1980–2011. Comparative Social Research 28: 89–165.
Arlen MJ (1969) Living-Room War. Peabody, MA: The Viking Press.
Berry SJ (2009) Watchdog Journalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappella JN and Jamieson KH (1997) Spiral of cynicism. The Press and the Public Good. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Davis A (2007) The economic inefficiencies of market liberalization. Global Media and
Communication 3(2): 157–178.
De Vreese C (2005) News Framing and typology. Information Design Journal + Document
Design 13(I): 51–62.
De Vreese C, Banducci SA, Semetko HA, et al. (2006) The news coverage of the 2004 European
Parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics 7(4): 477–504.
De Vreese C, Jochen P and Semetko H (2001) Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-
national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication 18(2): 107–122.
Dickinson M (2010) Where were the media in the financial crisis of 2008, and have we seen this
trend before? Honors Projects in Communication 7. Available at: http://digitalcommons.bry-
ant.edu/honors_communication/7
Donohue G, Tichenor PJ and Olien CN (1995) A guard dog perspective on the role of the media.
Journal of Communication 45(2): 115–132.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 15
Doyle G (2006) Financial news journalism: A post-Enron analysis of approaches towards eco-
nomic and financial news production in the UK. Journalism 7(4): 433–452.
Franklin B, Hamer M, Hanna M, et al. (2005) Key Concepts in Journalism. London: SAGE.
Galtung J and Ruge MH (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo,
Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research 2(1):
64–90.
Hallin DC and Mancini P (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallin DC and Papathanassopoulos S (2002) Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe
and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society 24(2): 175–195.
Herman E (2002) The media and markets in the United States. In: Alisa Clapp-Itnyre, Roumeen
Islam and Caralee McLiesh (eds) The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic
Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 61–82.
Hogan J and Doyle D (2007) The importance of ideas: An a priori critical juncture framework.
Canadian Journal of Political Science 40(4): 883–910.
Kier C (2012) Har finanskrisen sparket liv i kritisk erhvervsjournalistik. Master’s Thesis,
University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Kjær P, Erkama N and Grafström M (2007) Transforming business news content. In: Kjær P
and Slaata T (eds) Mediating Business: The Expansion of Business Journalism. Copenhagen:
Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 131–158.
Manning P (2013) Financial journalism, news sources and the banking crisis. Journalism 14(2):
173–189.
Marron MB, Sarabia-Panol Z, Sison MD, et al. (2010) The scorecard on reporting of the global
financial crisis. Journalism Studies 11(2): 270–283.
Miller G (2006) The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research
44: 1001–1033.
Norris P (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patterson TE (1998) Political roles of the journalist. In: Graber D, McQuail D and Norris P (eds)
The Politics of News: The News of Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 17–32.
Reich Z (2011) Different practices, similar logic: Comparing news reporting across political,
financial, and territorial beats. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17(1): 76–99.
Roush C (2006) Profits and Losses: Business Journalism and Its Role in Society. Oak Park, IL:
Marion Street Press.
Sanders D, Marsh D and Ward H (1993) The electoral impact of press coverage of the British
Economy 1979-87. British Journal of Political Science 23(2): 175–210.
Schiffrin A and Fagan R (2013) Are we all Keynesians now? The US press and the American
Recovery Act of 2009. Journalism 14(2): 151–172.
Schudson M (1993) Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct
the Past. New York: Basic Books.
Semetko HA and Valkenburg PM (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press
and television news. Journal of Communication 50(2): 93–109.
Skovsgaard M, Albæk E, Bro P, et al. (2013) A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions
impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism 14(1): 22–42.
Starkman D (2009) Power problem: The business press did everything but take on the institutions
that brought down the financial system. Columbia Journalism Review 48(1): 24–30.
Stein J and Baines D (2012) Myth making on the business-pages: Local press and global crisis.
Ethical Space: The international Journal of Communication Ethics 9(1): 52–59.
Strömbäck J and Shehata A (2007) Structural biases in British and Swedish election news cover-
age. Journalism Studies 8(5): 798–812.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
16 Journalism
Tambini D (2010a) Beyond the great crash of 2008: Questioning journalists’ legal and ethi-
cal frameworks. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics 7(3):
1–14.
Tambini D (2010b) What are financial journalists for? Journalism Studies 11(2): 158–174.
Tett G (2009) Icebergs and Ideologies: How Information Flows Fuelled the Financial Crisis.
Anthropology News 50(7): 6–7.
Thelen K (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political
Science 2: 369–404.
Tumber H (1993) Selling scandal: Business and the media. Media, Culture & Society 15(3): 345–
362.
Van Dalen A, De Vreese C and Albaek E (2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country
comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism
13(7): 903–922.
Wahl-Jorgensen K (2007) Journalists and the Public: Newsroom Culture, Letters to the Editor,
and Democracy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Zelizer B (1990) Achieving journalistic authority through narrative. Critical Studies in Media
Communication 7(4): 366–376.
Zelizer B (1992) CNN, the Gulf War, and journalistic practice. Journal of Communication 42(1):
66–81.
Author biographies
Antonis Kalogeropoulos is a PhD student of Political Communication in the University of Southern
Denmark. His main interests include political communication, framing effects, and far right wing
coverage.
Helle Mølgaard Svensson is a PhD student at the Center for Journalism at the Department of
Political Science at University of Southern Denmark. Her main interests are news coverage, news
bias, public opinion, and attitude formation. The purpose of her project is to examine how the
Danish news media cover the economy and how this news coverage influences people’s perception
of the economy.
Arjen van Dalen (PhD) is Associate Professor at the Centre for Journalism at the University of
Southern Denmark. He wrote his PhD dissertation on Political Journalism in Comparative
Perspective. His research interests are in comparative communication research, particularly jour-
nalistic cultures and the relations between journalists and politicians. He has published about these
topics in The Global Journalists in the 21st Century (edited by David Weaver and Lars Willnat,
2012) and journals such as the European Journal of Communication, Political Communication,
The International Journal of Press/politics, and Journalism Studies.
Claes de Vreese is Professor and Chair of Political Communication and Scientific Director of The
Amsterdam School of Communications Research ASCoR in the Department of Communication
Science at the University of Amsterdam. He is also Adjunct Professor of Political Science and
Journalism at the University of Southern Denmark. He has published more than 60 articles in
international peer-reviewed journals, including Communication Research, Journalism Studies,
Political Communication, Journal of Communication, International Journal of Public Opinion
Research, Public Opinion Quarterly, Scandinavian Political Studies, European Journal of
Communication, West European Politics, EU Politics, Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, Mass Communication & Society, and European Journal of Political Research.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Kalogeropoulos et al. 17
Erik Albæk is Professor in the Centre for Journalism at the University of Southern Denmark.
Professor Albæk has been visiting professor at MIT, Harvard University, Vilnius University
(Lithuania), Potsdam University (Germany), and the University of Amsterdam. He has been chair-
man of the Danish Social Science Research Council and the Nordic Political Science Association.
He has published articles in journals such as Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
Journalism, Political Communication, Journal of Communication, and Party Politics.
Downloaded from jou.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on July 27, 2015
Trade Facilitation
Capacity Needs
Policy Directions for
National and Regional
Development in West Africa
Edited by
Gbadebo Odularu
Philip Alege
CHAPTER 1
Gbadebo Odularu
G. Odularu (*)
Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, School of Business and
Technology, Marymount University, Arlington, VA, USA
Cross-Border Education Research Division, American Heritage University of
Southern California (AHUSC), Ontario, CA, USA
Centre for the Research on Political Economy (CREPOL), Dakar, Senegal
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
In June 2007, the ECOWAS Authority adopted ECOWAS Vision 2020, which is aimed
1
at setting a clear direction and goal to significantly raise the standard of living of the people
through conscious and inclusive programs that will guarantee a bright future for West Africa,
and shape the destiny of the region for many years to come – http://www.ecowas.int/
about-ecowas/vision-2020/.
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 3
2
Odularu 2013, as part of the dissertation submitted to the School of Law and Business,
University of Sunderland, United Kingdom.
3
UNECA/AUC/AfDB’s Assessing Regional Integration in Africa (ARIA) IV – Enhancing
Intra-African Trade, 2011. Available online at http://www.uneca.org/aria4/ARIA4Full.pdf.
6 G. ODULARU
4
The Sahel and West Africa Club (SWAC) comprises a group of West African regional
organizations, countries, and international organizations that work together towards the
development and integration of the West African region.
5
ECOWAS covers all the 15 West African countries. However, Mauritania withdrew in
2000. For an extensively detailed account of the efforts targeted at regional integration in
West Africa, see Yakubu, Gowon. 1984. ‘The Economic Community of West African States:
A Study in Political and Economic Integration’. 3 Volumes, 793 pp., University of Warwick,
United Kingdom. The electronic version of the doctoral thesis is available at http://wrap.
warwick.ac.uk/4397/1/WRAP_THESIS_Gowon_1984.pdf.
6
UEMOA covers the eight French-speaking West African countries, which include Benin,
Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Togo, and Senegal.
7
CILSS covers the Sahelian countries in West Africa.
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 7
8
The quest for regional integration stems from a desire to minimize the cost of trade
between nations and facilitate market access and growth for the region’s industries, as well as
to strengthen the economic power of the combined member states vis-à-vis third parties.
Further, it is a developmental necessity in relation to trade, economic performance, and
strengthening of policy credibility and effectiveness. In other words, strong organizational
and institutional initiatives, which are targeted at regional integration will expand the scope
of increased intra-regional trade, improved regional infrastructure, more efficient administra-
tive systems, higher levels of investment and industrialization, and reduced political contami-
nation of macroeconomic policies and programmes.
9
ECOWAS was founded on May 28, 1975, when the geopolitically related Anglophone,
Lusophone, and Francophone countries signed the Treaty of Lagos. It comprises 16 member
countries. These member countries are Cape Verde, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia,
Nigeria, and Sierra Leone (Non-CFA countries) and Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire,
Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo (CFA countries) as well as Mauritania.
10
The achievement of these goals will be driven through the implementation of a free trade
area and a custom union (elimination of custom duties, quantitative and administrative
restrictions to trade, establishment of a common external tariff), the creation of a common
market (elimination of all obstacles to the free movement of persons, capital, and services),
and the creation of an economic union (harmonization of economic, agricultural, industrial,
and monetary policies, and the establishment of a fund for cooperation and development).
11
The CFA franc is the name of two currencies used in parts of West and Central African
countries which are guaranteed by the French treasury.
8 G. ODULARU
enhance economic stability in the region. The key elements of its policy
include eliminating all tariffs and other trade barriers between the mem-
ber states and establishing a customs union, a unified fiscal policy, a com-
mon currency, and coordinated as well as harmonized regional policies in
transport, technology, communications, energy, and other infrastructure
facilities (CDD 2002).
In terms of population size, it represents the biggest organization for
regional integration on the African continent.12 ECOWAS exists alongside
other distinct sub-regional integration arrangements and inter-
governmental organizations (Table 1.1). The CEAO was created in 1973
with the establishment of a joint central bank, the Central Bank of West
African States (BCEAO). The Mano River Union was also established in
1973. Further, another community in the West African region is a group
of the distinct eight countries of the UEMOA, the eight constitute a mon-
etary and customs union. The other seven non-UEMOA countries may be
considered as a second group, each with its own national currency.
12
However, this may change with the current Tripartite Agreement between EAC,
COMESA, and SADC.
10 G. ODULARU
13
Regarding its procedures for accepting and implementing decisions, UEMOA responds
to requests from states who want greater regional coherence on particular policy issues. If the
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 11
decades. One of these includes all UEMOA members belong to the CFA
franc monetary zone, which is pegged to the Euro, and convertibility is
assured by the French Treasury. It is generally perceived that UEMOA
operates more successfully than ECOWAS. According to a former
ECOWAS Executive Secretary, only 45 per cent of ECOWAS programmes
has ever been implemented by its member states while the corresponding
figure for UEMOA is about 68 per cent. For instance, the UEMOA’s trade
liberalization scheme became effective in January 2000, resulting in the
abolishment of all tariffs on goods produced within the member states, the
adoption of a common external tariff (CET), and the standardization of
business laws.
request is accepted, UEMOA engages in a series of workshops at the national and regional
levels to ensure the harmonization of texts specific to the policy area. The executing organ—
UEMOA Commission—then passes the finalized text to the Council of Ministers, which
examines how to finance the activity in a manner that does not jeopardize the region’s mac-
roeconomic stability. This Council consists of two ministers from each member state, one of
whom is always the Minister of Finance, and meets at least twice a year. The decisions of this
Council are determined according to the principle of unanimity and are subsequently
imposed on the member states. If, however, a unanimous decision is not possible at this level,
the issue is presented to the Conference of Heads of States, which consists of the presidents
of the eight member states. This organ meets at least once a year and needs to abide by the
principle of unanimity before a decision can be taken. Once a decision is made, it is binding
on all member states. By contrast, the ECOWAS Executive Secretariat, which is the equiva-
lent to the UEMOA Commission, must submit all decisions, acts, and protocols to a highly
involved ratification process that ultimately decreases the number of programmes that are
actually implemented (Odularu 2013).
12 G. ODULARU
14
During the last four decades, ECOWAS has made quite considerable strides towards the
achievement of its goals – tariffs on intra-regional trade have been consistently reduced; free
movement of designated goods; and reduction of customs duties and adoption of ECOWAS
passport/travel documents.
15
The classification used for these statistics follows the ISIC Rev. 2 industrial classification,
which categorizes refined oil as a manufactured product while crude oil is classified as a min-
ing product.
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 13
• For Burkina Faso, exports to all regions are dominated by one agri-
cultural product, cotton. Export to West Africa also comprises a few
food and tobacco products (Cigarettes, sugar, and vegetable oil)
while hiOECD also contain some semi-processed gold.
• Guinea has very low regional exports, about half of which are of fish.
Exports to other regions are dominated by aluminum and gold in
different degrees of processing.
• For Mali, agricultural products (live animals) are the main export
items to West Africa. Agricultural products (in this case, mainly
cotton) also play an important role in its export portfolio to BRIC,
hiOECD, and RoW. The main export item, however, is semi-
processed gold, which is exported to South Africa and hiOECD.
16
The full implementation of the TFA is estimated to reduce global trade costs by an aver-
age of 14.3 per cent, with African countries and least developed countries (LDCs) forecast
to enjoy the biggest average reduction in trade costs. Full implementation has also been
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 15
Source: WCO, 2017. ‘Building a Single Window Environment’. Available online at: http://www.
wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/facilitation/instruments-and-tools/tools/sin-
gle-window/compendium/swcompendiumvol1all-parts.pdf
found to potentially reduce the average time needed to import by 47 per cent. Cuts in export
time will be even more dramatic with estimates predicting a 91 per cent reduction of the
current average.
17
The WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) was adopted in December 2013 at the
WTO’s Ninth Ministerial Conference, held in Bali, Indonesia, under the Doha Development
Agenda (DDA). The TFA entered into force on February 22, 2017.
18
Formalities connected with Importation, Exportation, and Transit.
16 G. ODULARU
19
Paperless trade allows for the coherent flow of trade activities on the basis of electronic
rather than paper documents. In other words, it provides the ecosystem where regulatory,
legal, and technical tools enhance paperless trade transactions via an electronic single window
facility, electronic port management systems, electronic certificate of origin, electronic cus-
toms declaration, document simplification and data harmonization, and so on.
20
A facility that allows parties involved in trade and transport to lodge (once) all the stan-
dardized information and documents with a single-entry point to fulfil all import, export,
and transit-related regulatory requirements. From the traders’ viewpoint, it results in
increased integrity and transparency, reduced costs and delays, efficient allocation of
resources, predictable rules, and faster clearances.
21
Cross-Border Regulatory Agencies (CBRA) includes inter alia ministries focusing on
trade, industry, tourism, agriculture, finance, mines, parks and wildlife, pharmacy, roads,
immigration, border police,
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 17
22
Non-tariff measures (NTMs) capture all government measures, other than tariffs or cus-
toms taxes, which restrict international commerce between domestic and imported goods
and services. NTMs can be described as policy measures that are outside the usual Customs
tariffs but still have an economic impact on trade internationally. There are the traditional
trade instruments, like quotas or trade defence measures. These measures can be said to be
non-tariff barriers (NTBs) because of their discriminatory and protective nature. Very impor-
tantly, NTMs are made up of policies that arise from non-trade objectives and are applied to
both foreign and domestic producers in an effort to protect against health or environmental
risks. Since such measures may affect trade, their application is regulated in WTO
agreements.
23
With Phase One almost concluded, Phase Two negotiations are expected to begin in late
2018 and focusing on provisions for investment, competition policy, and intellectually prop-
erty rights.
18 G. ODULARU
right to residence, and rights to establishment. The NTBs are some of the
most prominent barriers to intra-Africa trade. A significant progress will
be achieved by the AfCFTA in increasing intra-Africa trade, the facilitation
of trade through limiting the number of barrier traders are faced with
before their goods (as well as services) are allowed to go across the bor-
ders. Though the AfCFTA prioritizes five services sectors—communica-
tion, financial, tourism, transport, and business services, the barriers
hindering intra-Africa trade continuously and basically remain issues
around regulation, customs, and documentation at the border posts, pre-
shipment inspection, sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS), and the
technical barriers to trade (TBTS). The negative effect of these measures
on intra-regional trade is crucial but regional economic communities have
failed to address the challenges.
According to UNECA (2018), the establishment of the AfCFTA would
provide a strong basis for the industrialization and transformation of the
African continent towards deepening regional integration and boosting
intra-African trade.
A good number of the countries whose economies are doing well in the
past decades have been driven by trade-led growth. For most developing
countries, economic growth has been based on revenues from commodi-
ties. The SDGs post 2015 have, as part of their objectives, the transforma-
tion of mineral resources that can drive the economy, thereby reducing
poverty. Employment opportunities are created through trade, women are
empowered, entrepreneurs make more money, and there are massive
investments in infrastructural development. The development of trade
relies on an enabling environment, the ease of doing business, and other
policy and non-policy factors. If trade must have a significant effect on
poverty reduction, the underlying conditions must support favourable
sectorial growth patterns and inclusive employment and social policies. It
is crucial to combating increased inequalities from trade. Since there is a
drop in traditional tariffs, NTMs have become an important topic of dis-
cussion on sustainable global trade patterns.
There are positive indicators of a gradual but steady growth of econo-
mies in West Africa in the first half of 2018. As the global trade talks
continue in many parts of the world on how to reduce tariffs, NTBs
among trading countries may enhance the expansion of regional trade and
development networks. For instance, the current agreements in South
America and Africa, as well as talks by the EU and Mexico in April, 2018
show the seriousness of the NTMs.
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 19
Some of the challenges that West African RECs face in their efforts to
facilitate trade, as well as address NTBs, include inter alia:
24
Though the US-China trade war has been looming since March 2018, the trade dispute
effectively started on July 6, 2018. The cause of the dispute is due to ‘Made in China 2025’,
which aims to greatly improve the competitiveness of the Chinese manufacturing industry
and enable China to become the world’s manufacturing powerhouse (Lui 2018).
INTRODUCTION: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF TRADE FACILITATION… 21
References
Adekunle, B. (2018a). Digital Payment, Ethnocultural Food and Alternative
Agriculture [Blog]. Available at: http://evcontario2011.blogspot.com/2018/
06/digital-payment-ethnocultural-food-and.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2018.
Adekunle, B. (2018b). Asymmetric Information in the Halal Food Market – A
Research Project Understanding Halal Food: A Glimpse ... [Blog]. Available at:
http://evcontario2011.blogspot.com/2018/09/asymmetric-information-in-
halal-food.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
Aryeetey, E. (2001). Regional Integration in West Africa (Working Paper No.
170). OECD Development Centre.
Asenso-Okyere, K. (2005). Reflections on Economic Development Policy in West
Africa. Paper Presented at a Seminar at the International Food Policy Research
Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC.
22 G. ODULARU
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2017). Paperless Trading: How Does it Impact
the Trade System. Available online at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/
WEF_36073_Paperless_Trading_How_Does_It_Impact_the_Trade_System.
pdf
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2015). Agreement on Trade Facilitation.
Preparatory Committee on Trade Facilitation, W/L/931, July 15, 2015.
https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/20y_e/wto_tradefacilitation_e.pdf
Yakubu, G. (1984). The Economic Community of West African States: A Study in
Political and Economic Integration. 3 Volumes, 793pp, University of Warwick,
United Kingdom. The electronic version of the doctoral thesis is available at:
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/4397/1/WRAP_THESIS_Gowon_1984.pdf
Introduction
Paul Collier
This is a timely book. Although for Africa the past decade has been economi-
cally benign, attention in the international business media has been narrowly
focused. International investors have concentrated on the natural resource
sector, due to high prices for its exports, and international consumer busi-
nesses have been attracted by the consequential scope for expanding imports
of consumer goods. Yet Africa’s economies have huge potential for growth
that is more widely diffused across many sectors. Despite softer commodity
prices, during the coming decade Africa will continue to catch up with the
world economy.
Even in the natural resource sector, lower prices will be more than offset
by the expansion in the volume of resources extracted, reflecting a decade
of investment in prospecting. But the process of attracting further invest-
ment into the sector has become much more challenging now that the
sector is on the wrong side of the super-cycle. Africa now has its own signifi-
cant companies and these will more naturally continue to be focused on
the region. Especially for these companies, as Chapter 12 discusses, govern-
ments will need policies that make investment secure and attractive, while
ensuring that resource rents accrue as revenue.
From now on much of Africa’s growth will come from harnessing the
opportunities for investment and productivity across the economy. Sector
by sector, this book discusses those opportunities and the constraints that
will need to be overcome. To begin with a seemingly mundane example,
as the income of more Africans rises above subsistence levels, discretionary
consumption will increase disproportionately. This creates opportunities to
revolutionize retail distribution, which in much of the region remains domi-
nated by small scale and informality. The productivity gain from reaping the
economies of scale and specialisation that come with malls, supermarkets
and retail chains is enormous. This transformation is now happening across
Africa, but, as Chapter 9 makes clear, it faces significant policy impedi-
ments. The successful management of scale and specialisation in retailing
depends on professional expertise, and this is currently concentrated in
1
2 Paul Collier
relatively few African organisations. Yet as they bring their capabilities to new
markets, they often meet resistance from politicians and bureaucrats who are
suspicious of non-national companies. They also face logistical problems of
moving products across borders: barriers, costs and delays can eliminate the
potential productivity gains from organising supply chains regionally.
Further, with discretionary expenditures comes consumer concern for
product quality and variety. Firstly, consider the need to respond to the
demand for quality. Not only are informal modes of production and distri-
bution unable to harness the gains of scale and specialisation, they are
unable to build reputation with consumers. Informal products are not suffi-
ciently standardised for consumers to be able to trust a product based on a
past purchase, nor are good informal products legally protected from imita-
tion by look-alike inferior ones. As discussed in Chapter 5, branding offers
the solution to these problems, providing the scope for retailers and produ-
cers to build reputation with consumers free of the threat of imitation. But
African firms are latecomers: international firms can offer African consumers
established reputable brands and have the legal capacity to protect them
through patents and copyrights. Establishing equivalent African brands
urgently requires a phase of investment in advertising and legal expertise:
without it, African business will miss the boat as new consumers, in their
quest for quality, bond with international brands.
Probably the most important product whose quality urban African
households want to upgrade is their housing: except in South Africa, years
of neglect in housing investment have left most people living in shacks.
People are often physically capable of improving their housing with their
own labour, but the key input they need is cement. For decades, little
cement was produced locally, and tapping into international supply was
stymied by inadequate transport logistics, which are evidently particu-
larly important for cement due to its low value-to-weight ratio. In the
past decade, there has been a major expansion in African supply, but
demand, driven by the desire for better housing, is also rocketing. As
discussed in Chapter 8, it is important that the supply of cement is turned
from a bottleneck to a driver of growth.
Now consider the quest for variety. People in poverty make their own
entertainment, but one important use of discretionary spending is to widen
horizons. The media provide the window onto the limitless emporium of
modernity. But far more than in respect of products, the interface between
people and information is mediated by culture, and cultures are specific
to societies. A Chinese bicycle can be marketed to an African household
more readily than a Chinese soap opera, let alone a Chinese newspaper. The
expanding demand for information, discussed in Chapter 11, is a huge oppor-
tunity for an indigenous African media. On the base of meeting domestic
demand, the industry can also meet the previously latent demand in the
large African diaspora.
Introduction 3
28
Why Governance Matters for Investment 29
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
-
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2013
Figure 2.1 Per capita incomes in Sub-Saharan Africa (in US$)
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org.
income for the state coffers, formalisation also allows statistical offices to
gain a more accurate understanding of economic activity in the country.
Although empirical evidence suggests that formalisation correlates with
higher per capita incomes, there is a risk in poorly governed countries
that tax revenues go straight to corrupt officials rather than to the state
coffers, as well as opening up more scope for kickbacks or extortion.10
For informal enterprises, getting caught in the net of state surveillance
and taxation may seem like a bad deal, but it has its upside: informal
businesses are often destined to remain small because they have to
remain inconspicuous to avoid the state’s attentions and because they
find it harder to access funding for expansion from banks and investors.
Becoming formally registered removes these impediments, allowing
enterprises to grow to much larger sizes. Larger enterprises are able to
benefit from economies of scale and greater division of labour, making
them more efficient and able to offer better products and services to
consumers.11
Although most people detest being coerced into making involuntary
contributions to the state coffers, taxes have an important role to play
in governance. The more a state depends on taxes from individuals and
companies, the more accountable it has to be to both. Those paying the
bill are more likely to question what is being done with the money when
they are citizens than when they are foreign governments (in the case of
development aid) or large concerns exploiting natural resources, eager
to maintain friendly relationships with the host country government.12
Africa still faces enormous challenges. Corruption is pervasive, phys-
ical infrastructure lacking or insufficient and states appear incapable
of delivering the services that many citizens need or desire.13 Poverty
remains shockingly high and the high population growth rates raise the
spectre of enormous masses of young, frustrated people finding ways to
express their outrage destructively. Violent extremism is on the rise in
east and west Africa, and some regions, like South Sudan and the Central
African Republic, are descending into violent anarchy.
Yet many of these problems have existed, in one form or another, for
decades. It is only in the past 10–15 years that the prospect has emerged,
however slim its chances, of a change in this situation. It is not just
because there has been some economic growth where previously there
was very little. It is also because all African countries now conduct elec-
tions, most allow multiple parties to participate (or at least pretend to)
and several have experienced a change of leadership by means of elec-
tions. Governance, though far from perfect, is beginning to improve.
International relations do not need to focus inexorably on the former
colonisers in the Western world, but can be built with countries such as
Brazil, China and India in the global south.
Why Governance Matters for Investment 33
Notes
1. World Bank, World Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org
(accessed 27 August 2014). Figures are constant 2005 US dollars, corrected for
the effects of inflation.
2. Forbes, How Dictators Manage Their Billions, http://www.forbes.com/2000/06/
22/feat.html; Who Were Africa’s Richest Dictators?, http://www.forbes.com/
sites/mfonobongnsehe/2011/11/08/who-were-africas-richest-dictators/;
Daddy‘s Girl: How an African ‘Princess’ Banked $3 Billion in a Country Living
on $2 a Day, http://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2013/08/14/how-
isabel-dos-santos-took-the-short-route-to-become-africas-richest-woman/ (all
accessed 27 August 2014).
3. Global Financial Integrity, Illicit Financial Flows from Africa: Hidden Resource
for Development (March 2010), http://www.gfintegrity.org/storage/gfip/
documents/reports/gfI_africareport_web.pdf, p. 5.
4. World Bank, World Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org
(accessed 27 August 2014). The figure given is in current US dollars. Africa’s
GDP was given as $2.3 trillion in 2013.
5. Global Financial Integrity and African Development Bank, Illicit Financial
Flows and the Problem of Net Resource Transfers from Africa: 1980–2009
(March 2013), http://www.gfintegrity.org/storage/gfip/documents/reports/
AfricaNetResources/gfi_afdb_iffs_and_the_problem_of_net_resource_transfers_
from_africa_1980-2009-web.pdf, p. 1. Quote: ‘Results indicate that Africa was a
net creditor to the world, as measured by the net resource transfers, to the tune
of up to US$1.4 trillion over the period 1980–2009, adjusted for inflation’.
6. Forbes, Number of African Billionaires Surges to 27, http://www.forbes.com/
sites/kerryadolan/2013/11/13/number-of-african-billionaires-surges-to-27-up-
two-thirds-from-2012/ (accessed 27 August 2014).
7. World Bank, Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://info.worldbank.org/
governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (accessed 27 August 2014).
8. Deloitte University Press, The Boom and Beyond: Managing Commodity Price
Cycles, http://dupress.com/articles/global-economic-outlook-q1-2014-the-
boom-and-beyond-managing-commodity-price-cycles/ (accessed 27 August
2014).
9. Mushtaq H. Khan, Governance, Economic Growth and Development since the 1960s,
http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/9921/1/DESA_Governance_Economic_Growth_
and_Development_since_1960s.pdf.
34 John Endres
10. Christopher Woodruff, Registering for Growth: Tax and the Informal Sector
in Developing Countries (July 2013), http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/
economics/research/centres/cage/onlinepublications/briefing/chj854_cage_
woodruff_bp_09_07_13_web.pdf. ‘Increasing the formalization rates of small
firms is unlikely to offer governments a substantial new source of revenue in
the short run’ (p. 10).
11. On the benefits of business formalisation, see USAID, Removing Barriers to
Formalization: The Case for Reform and Emerging Best Practice (March 2005),
http://www.oecd.org/dac/povertyreduction/38452590.pdf.
12. OECD, Citizen-State Relations: Improving Governance through Tax Reform (2010),
http://www.oecd.org/dac/governance-development/46008596.pdf.
13. Afrobarometer, Governments Falter in Fight to Curb Corruption: The People Give
Most a Failing Grade (November 2013), http://www.afrobarometer.org/files/
documents/policy_brief/ab_r5_policybriefno4.pdf; What People Want from
Government: Basic Services Performance Ratings, 34 Countries (December 2013),
http://www.afrobarometer.org/files/documents/policy_brief/ab_r5_policy-
briefno5.pdf.
3
Regional Economic Communities
Jacqueline Chimhanzi
There is, arguably, no greater topical issue in Africa than that of regional inte-
gration – a concept whose time has definitely come but whose operation-
alisation is still in the making and upon which Africa’s massive unrealised
potential lies. Central to the importance of Regional Economic Communities
(RECs) is their cross-cutting nature that transcends virtually all economic
activity and sectors – from manufacturing, energy, infrastructure and finan-
cial services to tourism – underpinned by a very simple rationale – that
there is strength in numbers. Given the transformative potential of regional
integration, the integration discourse is actually best located in the broader
context of development and economic transformation – beyond merely
‘fixing borders’ as an end in itself. Marcelo Giugale, the World Bank’s Africa
Director for Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, aptly expressed it
as follows: ‘The final prize is clear: ... Africans trad[ing] goods and services with
each other. Few contributions carry more development power than that’.1
Despite this recognition of the salience of regional integration, it is
not happening fast enough and undermines Africa’s continued ‘rising’
and competitiveness. The African market is highly fragmented. With
a similar population size to China and India, Africa is, in comparison,
54 markets, China 1 and India 1, and therein lies the challenge for compa-
nies – both international and African – wanting to access African opportuni-
ties and do business on the continent. Africa’s intra-trade levels remain low
compared to other regions in the world.
The chapter opens with the rationale and context for the need for RECs
on the African continent followed by an overview of the state of play in the
development of African RECs. There will then be a focus on attempting to
understand the underlying issues accounting for low intra-regional trade.
This is followed by a specific focus on the East African Community (EAC),
deemed one of the better performing and most dynamic RECs. Justification,
along different performance metrics and indicators, is provided for with
the selection of the EAC as a focal case study. The experience of the MeTL
Group based in Tanzania and recognised as a leading East African industrial
35
36 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
Table 3.1 Six stages of the establishment of the African economic community
CEN-SAD Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Central African 1994 Tripoli, Libya
(Community of Sahel-Saharan Republic, Comoros, Côte d’Ivoire, Chad, Djibouti, Egypt,
States) Eritrea, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kenya,
Liberia, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria,
São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia,
Sudan, Togo, Tunisia.
COMESA Burundi, Comoros, Democratic Republics of Congo, 1994 Lusaka, Zambia
(Common Market for Eastern and Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya,
Southern Africa) Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Rwanda, Seychelles,
Sudan, Swaziland, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe
EAC (East African Community) Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda 1966–1977 then Arusha, Tanzania
2000–present
ECCAS (Economic Community of Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, 1983 Libreville, Gabon
Central African States) Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea,
Gabon, Republic of Congo, São Tomé and Príncipe
ECOWAS (Economic Community Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, 1975 Abuja, Nigeria
of West African States) Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger,
Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo
IGAD (Intergovernmental Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan, 1996 Djibouti, Djibouti
Authority on Development) Uganda
SADC (Southern African Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1980 Gaborone,
Development Community) Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Botswana
Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania,
Zambia, Zimbabwe
UMA Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia 1989 Rabat, Morocco
that undermine trade while non-tariff barriers refer to non-tariff related trade
restrictions resulting from prohibitions, conditions or specific requirements
that render the importation and exportation of goods difficult or expensive.23
These include red tape and bureaucracy, inefficient customs and border posts
and poor infrastructure for the movement of goods between countries. Also,
licensing rules, import permits and standards, including their implementa-
tion, fall within this category.
A key challenge militating against effective regional trade relates to the
delays in moving goods across borders within and between regions. Delays
in terms of crossing borders are, on average, longer than in the rest of the
world: 12 days in Sub-Saharan countries compared with 7 days in Latin
America, less than 6 days in Central and East Asia, and slightly more than
4 days in Central and East Europe.24 These delays add a tremendous cost to
importers and exporters and increase the transaction costs of trading among
African countries. For food and other perishable goods, such delays can be
devastating.
Regional Economic Communities 41
UMA
UMA Libya
Algeria Libya
Algeria Morocco
Morocco
IGAD
IGAD
Mauritania
Mauritania Tunisia
Tunisia Somalia
Somalia
Kenya
Kenya
Djibouti
Djibouti Uganda
Uganda
Eritrea
Eritrea EAC
EAC
Sudan
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
CEN-SAD
CEN-SAD Sudan
Egypt Tanzania
Tanzania
Malawi
Malawi Zambia
Zambia SADC
SADC
Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe
Burundi
Burundi Mozambique
Mozambique
CEMAC Central
CameroonCentral DRC
DRC
African
Congo Rep.
African
Republic
Equtorial
Republic
epublic Botswana
Botswana
Guinea Chad
had CEPGL Lesotho
Chad
Gabon Lesotho
Rwanda
Rwanda Swaziland Namibia
Namibia
South Africa
ECCAS
ECCAS South Africa
Angola SACU
o Tom and Principle
São
Mautitius
SACU
Seyehelles
Comoros
Madagascar
Burkina Faso
Benin, Gambia
Gambia
Mali Nigeria
Niger Nigeria COMESA
COMESA IOC
IOC
Senegal
Togo
Côte d’lvoire
UEMOA
UEMOA Guinea Bissau union
Réunion
MRU
MRU
Liberia
Liberia
Guinea
Guinea
ECOWAS
ECOWAS Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone
Cape Verde
Cape Verde
Ghana
Ghana
free trade area. The African REC, therefore, straddles both national and
supranational contexts and therein lies the complexity in operationalising
the regional trade mandate.
At the opening session of the 2013 African Development Bank’s Africa
Economic Conference, South Africa’s then finance minister, Pravin
Gordhan, acknowledged this collaboration/competition tension stating
that treading this fine balance requires a ‘special kind of leadership’
that appreciates sovereignty yet relinquishes aspects of it for the greater
regional good. A particularly fitting illustration of this is how African states
continue to negotiate as individual countries and not as RECs, thus losing
the opportunity to leverage scale. By mid-2010, for example, African coun-
tries had signed 748 bilateral investment treaties, 140 of which were with
other African countries.30 Whilst, for instance, a singular negotiator, the
European Commission, carries out negotiations on behalf of the European
Union, no REC Commission or Secretariat negotiates on behalf of their
member countries.
Integration continues to be viewed as threatening whereas it should be
viewed as a win-win policy and not as a zero-sum game. In similar vein,
UNCTAD31 finds it difficult to understand why countries are reluctant to
adopt common standards and regulations from which they are all likely to
gain. This points to the need to actively manage the soft side of integration.
Fears of sovereignty being undermined need to be mitigated against as they
are unfounded. Empirical evidence points to the potential benefits of inte-
gration. In a study by TradeMark Southern African, the potential benefits of
a successful TFTA were outlined in the impact study, ‘General Equilibrium
Analysis of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite FTA’. The report considered eight
TFTA simulator scenarios and found that net real income gains would accrue
to members of the TFTA generating annual welfare gains of $518 million.32 It
is perhaps due to this perceived loss of sovereignty that African governments
have not successfully managed to mainstream and integrate regional trade
mandates into national policies. It would appear that countries have not
‘internalised’ regional trade imperatives as planning for the state and for
the region continue to happen in parallel, not concurrently nor in an inte-
grated manner. On this, Rwanda’s experience is instructive. The country
is embarking on socio-economic transformation that is to be attained via
regional integration. This aspiration has, subsequently, been enshrined in
the country’s Vision 2020.
While the AU has set up the Conference of Ministers in Charge of
Regional Integration to holistically look into the implementation
of protocols, harmonisation of policies and programmes and co-
ordination between RECs, there is a ‘hearts and minds’ aspect that cannot
be addressed by policy instruments. Winning hearts and minds could be the
basis for building the necessary political will.
44 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
Poverty
Economic reduction
growth
Figure 3.2 How trade facilitation can contribute to reaching development goals
Source: Rippel, B., “Why Trade Facilitation Is Important for Africa,” in World Bank 2012:
“De-Fragmenting Africa: Deepening Regional Trade Integration in Goods and Services”.
political motivations for joining a REC, 39 per cent cited economic reasons,
16 per cent cited geographic reasons, 6 per cent historical and 8 per cent
cultural. This further supports the assertion that even for those RECs with a
trade agenda, trade is not always their overarching priority despite all their
pronouncements. While trade agreements are signed by governments, it is
the private sector that understands the constraints facing enterprises and is
in a position to take advantage of the opportunities created by regional trade
initiatives. While there are business councils, governments remain the only
active drivers of regional integration in Africa and the private sector remains
a passive participant in the process. If African governments want to achieve
their objective of boosting intra-African trade, they have to create more
space for the private sector to play an active role in the integration process.
But more importantly, the African private sector must be able to occupy that
space. Evidence, however, points to a weak African private sector with limited
capacity. For instance, most African private sector jobs are in the informal
sector with only 2–10 per cent of African workers occupying permanent/
formal wage employment. Permanent formal employment in the private
46 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
sector is highest in South Africa, Botswana and Egypt at 46 per cent, 23 per
cent and 18 per cent, respectively.41 The African scenario, as depicted, is said
to contrast sharply with that in Asia, where the private sector is strong and
plays a crucial role in shaping the integration agenda.42
The very establishment of the Scorecard itself, in the first place, and less
so the outcomes of the scoring exercise, is indicative of the EAC’s commit-
ment to a functioning REC. The Scorecard has established a starting point for
continuous improvement based on a quantifiable basis.
As mentioned earlier, the EAC is the better performing of the African RECs.
However, closer examination reveals that integration is neither consistent
nor wholesale. Rather, integration in the EAC manifests in three of the
following ways:
Achievements Achievements
Increased intra-EAC trade 55 non-tariff barriers (NTBs) resolved in 2013 compared to 36 in 2012. 10 NTBs resolved in the first five months of 2014
(according to the EAC Secre- East Africa Payment System (EAPS) launched by EAC central banks in 2013. It will enable real time money transfers without currency conversion costs
tariat, intra-EAC trade more Real time gross settlement (RTGS) systems linked by regional commercial banks in 2012. As a result, cheque clearance times have reduced from
than doubled from US$1 22 days to just one day
617,1 million in 2006 to US$3 In 2013 the East African Securities Regulatory Authorities group (the EAC’s capital markets regulators) launched a four year strategic plan aimed
800.7 million in 2010) at harmonising a capital markets regulatory and legal framework within the EAC
Challenges Challenges
Agreement on country spe- Several NTBs still remain unresolved to date
cific lists of exclusions to the Member states still retain different classification for work permits: Tanzania has 13 sub-classes; Uganda and Kenya have 9; while Rwanda and Burundi have 2
Common External Tariff (CET) Remains unlikely that all the goals of the protocol will be achieved by 2015, the initial target for full implementation
Membership of Partner States
in other regional economic
communities (RECs) that have
different CET rates
Figure 3.4 Overview of the EAC integration process: key phases and milestones
Source: Africa Practice (2014), “East Africa Integration: State of Play,” Africa Practice InDepth.
50 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
The EAC trading bloc, under the Common External Tariff system, is designed
to keep out foreign competition whilst at the same time promoting trade
within the EAC countries. To put it otherwise, it is protectionist vis-à-vis
outsiders but protective of insiders within the community. This has helped
ensure that the countries gain their competitive strength and are strong as
the building blocks of the EAC. According to Mohammed Dewji, at a time
when Africa is particularly vulnerable to cheap imports from China, certain
industries in East Africa are cushioned given the tariff regime. He confi-
dently asserts, ‘They (the Chinese) cannot compete with me in my market’.
He explains it thus: in a bid to promote local value-addition and beneficia-
tion, the Tanzanian government has recognised the job creation potential of
the textiles sector and has accorded the industry a tax relief status for local
producers whilst imposing 25 per cent import tariffs on finished goods and
18 per cent VAT for those importing into the country. Moreover, Tanzania
grows cotton and is the third largest grower on the continent whereas China
has cotton but insufficient to meet demand and has to import to address
the supply gap. Textiles accounts for 5 per cent of Tanzania manufacturing
value-add (MVP) with it being a significant exporter of textiles to other EAC
countries.60
The MeTL Group has leveraged the rules of origin to its advantage – a
regional integration policy instrument that is normally fraught with
complications. Shoprite, the South African retailer that is now Africa’s
largest retailer, prefers not to exercise its rules of origin entitlement within
the SADC region opting to pay full tariffs because it deems the process of
administering rules of origin documentation to be too cumbersome.61
The determination of the eligibility of products to EAC origin and the
granting of Community Tariffs to goods originating in the Partner States
are important processes in the implementation of the EAC trade regime.62
The MeTL Group has a different experience of rules of origin and the busi-
ness model has been structured to leverage the benefits of rules of origin.
Thus, MeTL imports wheat, not flour, and crude palm oil is imported from
Malaysia and Indonesia which is then processed in Tanzania. But to then
export the refined oil to Uganda, for example, would mean Uganda would
have to pay tariffs. However, for sunflower oil which is grown in Tanzania,
the group can process and export it to Uganda at 0 per cent tariff. Over the
years, the EAC member states have aligned their tariffs in accordance with
and support of the rules of origin regime. Tanzania, for example, migrated
towards it over a period of five years, going from 20 per cent to 15 per cent to
10 per cent, 5 per cent and then 0 per cent. Mohammed Dewji explains that
different countries have different comparative advantages and this allows
the different EAC countries to beneficiate locally while benefitting the EAC
intra-trading of goods in a complementary manner. The EAC’s approach
is consistent with a key tenet of regional integration: that ‘a continental
customs union requires that all Africa countries have a single commercial
Regional Economic Communities 55
Table 3.5 Progress towards elimination of tariffs and equivalent measures by EAC
partner states (Based on 2008–2013 Data; all values in per cent)
Compliance with 20 20 20 20 20 20
tariff schedule
Adoption of rules of 20 20 20 20 20 20
origin requirements
Use of charges of 30 30 27 24 21 18
equivalent effect to
tariffs
Recognition of 16 14.4 16 14.4 11.2 8
certificates of origin
Compliance with 7 7 7 7 0 0
EAC Council
Recommendation
about issuance of
certificate of origin by
customs authorities
Compliance with 7 0 0 0 0 0
Custom Union
Protocol Annex
III about false
documentation for
certificates of origin
100 91.4 90 85.4 72.2 66
Source: K’Ombudo, A.O., East Africa Common Market Scorecard 2014: Tracking EAC Compliance in
the Movement of Capital, Services and Goods. The World Bank, International Finance Corporation
and East African Secretariat.
(tariff) policy vis-à-vis the rest of the world while trade within Africa is totally
free, respecting the continental rules of origin’. The EAC has made formi-
dable progress on this, at least, relative to other African RECs with regards to
the implementation of a customs union.
Conclusions
● In the context of globalisation, Africa’s rising and the competitiveness of
countries such as China, there is greater urgency to expedite the regional
integration agenda. These dynamics render the issue of integration
inherently more complex and Africa finds itself in a somewhat discon-
certing and unique position where it, at once, needs to raise intra-REC
trade whilst simultaneously confronting external competition that is cost
competitive.
● In light of evidence suggesting slow progress towards the attainment of the
African Economic Community, it would appear there is a lack of urgency
or political will on the part of regional bodies in addressing regional trade
issues. This was similarly observed by Peters-Berries,68 who noted that ‘the
political will for regional integration has not been adequately translated
into action’. Despite all the pronouncements, there still appears to be a
lack of appreciation of how regional trade can truly lead to the economic
transformation of African countries. Consequently, effective integration
needs to be repositioned as a win-win for both the private sector and
governments, themselves, in helping the latter deliver on their mandates
to their people.
● The African private sector is conspicuous by its absence in the regional
integration discourse. In attempting to raise intra-REC trade levels,
regional bodies need to work with the private sector in understanding
their concerns and in co-crafting the solutions. According to the African
Development Bank,69 ‘government and the national/regional Chambers
of Commerce and Business Councils are already interacting in the region,
but the contact has to extend beyond information sharing to involve-
ment in policy making and program implementation process’ and infra-
structure building via public-private-partnership arrangements (PPPs).
The East African Exchange (EAX), a private sector initiative, is a fitting
example of how the private sector can play a lead and pivotal role in
driving the aspirations of a common market, in a manner that is mutually
beneficial to the private and public sectors.
Recommendations
● Removal of trade and non-trade barriers is a necessary but not sufficient
condition for effective regional integration. A broader integration para-
digm that addresses supply-side constraints is needed. To that end, RECs
need to identify the infrastructure gaps that hinder effective trade across
borders and attract investors, as regional bodies, to fill those gaps.
● Soft issues need to be actively managed alongside policy issues. Citizenry
awareness and education are vital to ensure buy-in into the regional trade
58 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
that says: “When you are ready, you can join. But we are not going to
wait for you”’.73 The EAC’s Coalition of the Willing has demonstrated
this by demonstrating urgency and setting the cadence and tone for
economic integration but perhaps – controversially – at the expense of
the broader political alignment of the EAC.
Notes
1. World Bank, ‘Harnessing Regional Integration for Trade and Growth in Southern
Africa’ (2011), http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPTRADE/
Resources/Harnessing_Regional_Integration_Trade_Growth_SouthernAfrica.pdf,
p. xvi.
2. J. Chimhanzi, ‘Mitigating Business Risk through Regional Integration’, Deloitte on
Africa Series (2012a).
3. L. Lapadre and F. Luchetti, Trade Regionalisation and Openness in Africa. European
Report on Development. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/54. European University
Institute, Florence (2010).
4. ‘The World’s Fastest-Growing Continent: Aspiring Africa’, The Economist
(2 March 2013).
5. Chimhanzi, ‘Mitigating Business Risk through Regional Integration’.
6. D. A. Mohammed, ‘Size and Competitiveness: An Examination of the CARICOM
Single Market and Economy (CSME)’, The Round Table (Vol. 97, No. 395, 2008),
pp. 287–303.
7. R. Kaplinsky and M. Morris, ‘Do the Asian Drivers Undermine Export-Oriented
Industrialization in SSA?’ World Development (Vol. 36, No. 2, 2008), pp. 254–273.
K. Ighobor, ‘China in the Heart of Africa: Opportunities and Pitfalls in a Rapidly
Expanding Relationship’, Africa Renewal (Vol. 26, No. 3, 2013), pp. 6–8.
8. UNCTAD and UNIDO, Economic Development in Africa Report 2011. Fostering
Industrial Development in Africa in the New Global Environment. United Nations
Publication. Sales No. E.11.II.D.14. New York and Geneva (2011).
9. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African
Trade: Unlocking Private Sector Dynamism’ (July 2013), http://unctad.org/en/
PublicationsLibrary/aldcafrica2013_en.pdf (retrieved 21 January 2014).
10. ‘A More Hopeful Continent: The Lion Kings’, The Economist (6 January 2011). ‘The
Hopeless Continent’, The Economist (11 May 2000).
11. ‘The Hopeful Continent: Africa Rising’, The Economist (3 December 2011).
12. Chimhanzi, ‘Mitigating Business Risk through Regional Integration’.
13. Jessica Pugliese, ‘Will There Be an African Economic Community?’ Brookings
Institute (9 January 2014).
14. M. Ndulo, ‘Harmonisation of Trade Laws in the African Economic Community’,
International and Comparative Law Quarterly (Vol. 42, 1993), pp. 101–118.
15. V. Ihekweazu, ‘A Proposed Framework for an Effective Africa Free Trade Area’,
Unpublished thesis, University of Pretoria, The Gordan Institute of Business
(2014).
16. EAC Secretariat, Manual on the Application of East Africa Community Rules of Origin,
Directorate of Customs and Trade, Arusha, Tanzania (2006).
17. B. Omilola, ‘To What Extent Are Regional Trade Arrangements in Africa Fulfilling
the Conditions for Successful RTAs?’, Journal of African Studies and Development
(Vol. 3, No. 6, 2011), pp. 105–113.
60 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
18. Ihekweazu, ‘A Proposed Framework for an Effective Africa Free Trade Area’.
19. African Union Commission, ‘Boosting Intra-Africa Trade: Issues Affecting
Intra-African Trade, Proposed Action Plan for Boosting Intra-African Trade and
Framework for the Fast Tracking of a Continental Free Trade Area’ (2012).
20. African Union Conference of Ministers of Trade, 6th Ordinary Session,
29 October–November 2010.
21. UNECA, ‘Assessing Regional Integration in Africa (ARIA V): Towards an African
Continental Free Trade Area’ (2012a).
22. H. Ben Barka, ‘Border Posts, Checkpoints, and Intra-African Trade: Challenges and
Solutions’, The African Development Bank (2012).
23. TradeMark Southern Africa, EAC Customs Union – Uniform Laws to Enhance
both Regional and External Trade (2012).
24. World Bank, ‘Harnessing Regional Integration for Trade and Growth in Southern
Africa’ (2011), http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPTRADE/
Resources/Harnessing_Regional_Integration_Trade_Growth_SouthernAfrica.pdf.
25. P. Brenton and I. Gözde, ‘Linking African Markets: Removing Barriers to Intra-
Africa Trade’ in Brenton, P and Gözde, I (eds.), De-Fragmenting Africa: Deepening
Regional Trade Integration in Goods and Services, World Bank Report, (Washington,
DC, 2012).
26. World Bank, ‘Harnessing Regional Integration for Trade and Growth in Southern
Africa’.
27. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African
Trade: Unlocking Private Sector Dynamism’ (July 2013), http://unctad.org/en/
PublicationsLibrary/aldcafrica2013_en.pdf (retrieved 21 January 2014).
28. World Bank and IFC, ‘Doing Business in the East African Community 2013.
Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises’ (2013).
29. E.M. Medalla and J. Balboa, ‘ASEAN Rules of Origin: Lessons and Recommendations
for Best Practice’, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Philippines
(2009).
30. African Union Conference of Ministers of Trade, 6th Ordinary Session,
29 October–November 2010.
31. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African Trade:
Unlocking Private Sector Dynamism’.
32. TradeMark Southern Africa, EAC Customs Union – Uniform Laws to Enhance both
Regional and External Trade; Ihekweazu, ‘A Proposed Framework for an Effective
Africa Free Trade Area’.
33. B. Rippel, ‘Why Trade Facilitation is Important for Africa’, in World Bank 2012:
‘De-Fragmenting Africa: Deepening Regional Trade Integration in Goods and
Services.
34. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African Trade:
Unlocking Private Sector Dynamism’.
35. Rippel, ‘Why Trade Facilitation is Important for Africa’.
36. Ibid.
37. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African Trade:
Unlocking Private Sector Dynamism’.
38. Ibid.
39. Ibid.
40. UNECA, Study Report on Mainstreaming Regional Integration into National
Development Strategies and Plans. Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa
(2012b).
Regional Economic Communities 61
41. M. Stampini, R. Leung, S.M. Diarra and L. Pla, How Large Is the Private Sector in
Africa? Evidence from National Accounts and Labour Markets, Institute for the
Study of Labour, IZA Discussion Paper No. 6267 (2011).
42. UNCTAD, ‘Economic Development in Africa Report 2013 – Intra African trade:
unlocking private sector dynamism’.
43. A.O. K’Ombudo, East Africa Common Market Scorecard 2014: Tracking EAC
Compliance in the Movement of Capital, Services and Goods. The World Bank,
International Finance Corporation and East African Secretariat.
44. E. Iruobe, ‘EAC Trade Climbed To $5.5bn In Last Decade’ Ventures Africa maga-
zine (2014).
45. UNCTAD, ‘Trade Liberalisation, Investment and Economic Integration in African
Regional Economic Communities towards the Africa Common Market’ (2012).
46. Africa Practice, ‘East Africa Integration: State of Play’, Africa Practice InDepth
(August 2014).
47. C.G. Ntim, ‘Why African Stock Markets Should Formally Harmonise and Integrate
Their Operations’, African Review of Economics and Finance (Vol. 4, No. 1, December
2012).
48. Ntim, ‘Why African Stock Markets Should Formally Harmonise and Integrate
Their Operations’.
49. Ibid.
50. Ibid.
51. Ibid.
52. Ibid.
53. Ibid.
54. ‘East Africa Exchange Launched in Kigali’, The New Times (4 July 2014).
55. Ibid.
56. M.L. Oketch, ‘Boos to Trade as Cross-Border Payment System Comes Live’, The
East African (7, December 2013).
57. Africa Practice, ‘East Africa Integration: State of Play’, Africa Practice InDepth,
August 2014.
58. Africa Practice, ‘East Africa Integration’.
59. M. Campioni and P. Noack, eds., Rwanda Fast Forward: Social, Economic, Military
and Reconciliation Prospects (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).
60. UNIDO, Tanzanian Industrial Competitiveness Report (2012).
61. World Bank Report, ‘De-Fragmenting Africa: Deepening Regional Trade Integration
in Goods and Services’ (2012).
62. EAC Secretariat, 2006.
63. N. Moyo and A. Leke, ‘Lessons Learned from the Airbus Success Story: A Template
for Regional Integration’, Unpublished (2014).
64. T. Creamer, ‘Could Airbus Revive Africa’s Stalled Economic Integration?’ Engineering
News (August 2014).
65. Moyo and Leke, ‘Lessons Learned from the Airbus Success Story’.
66. African Development Bank, ‘Regional Integration: The Importance of the Economy
and Political Will’, May 2014, AfDB Annual Meetings, Kigali, Rwanda.
67. Moyo and Leke, ‘Lessons Learned from the Airbus Success Story’.
68. C. Peters-Berries, ‘Regional Integration in Southern Africa – A Guidebook’,
Capacity Building, Germany (2010).
69. African Development Bank, Eastern African, Regional Integration Strategy Paper,
2011–2015 (September 2011).
70. K’Ombudo, East Africa Common Market Scorecard 2014.
62 Jacqueline Chimhanzi
71. Ibid.
72. Moyo and Leke, ‘Lessons Learned from the Airbus Success Story’.
73. Creamer, ‘Could Airbus Revive Africa’s Stalled Economic Integration?.
Much has been written about Africa’s lack of transport infrastructure and
the detrimental effect poor transport infrastructure has on economic devel-
opment. The Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA)
Study Synthesis1 shows that infrastructure plays a key role in economic
growth and poverty reduction and that, conversely, the lack of infrastructure
adversely affects productivity and raises production and transaction costs.
This, in turn, hinders growth by reducing the competitiveness of businesses
and the ability of governments to pursue economic and social development
policies. According to the PIDA Study Synthesis, ‘Deficient infrastructure in
today’s Africa has been found to sap growth by as much as 2 per cent a year
(Calderón 2008)’.
The Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic (AICD)2 estimated in 2009
that it would cost US$93 billion a year to raise Africa’s infrastructure endow-
ment to a reasonable level over the following decade, with the split in
expenditure being two to one between investment and maintenance. The
AICD report calculated that African countries already spend US$45 billion
a year on infrastructure and that efficiency gains could raise an additional
US$17 billion from within the existing envelope, leaving an annual funding
gap of US$31 billion.
These headline figures highlight the daunting task African countries
face if they are to take infrastructure to levels that will allow African-
based firms and businesses to become competitive both within Africa
and globally. In a lecture3 in September 2014 at the London School of
Economics, Donald Kaberuka, the President of the African Development
Bank, said that African countries are now able to spend only about
5 per cent of their GDP on infrastructure, a figure which must rise to
nearer 15 per cent. Even this figure of 15 per cent will not be enough for
some countries. For example, the AICD report estimates that the so-called
Fragile States would need to spend the equivalent of about 70 per cent of
their GDP on infrastructure to close the perceived infrastructure gap and,
without external support, this is obviously not a feasible proposition.
63
64 Mark Pearson
The shift in focus by the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) from polit-
ical liberation to economic development in the last quarter of the twentieth
century led to the design of a number of pan-African development approaches,
such as the Lagos Plan of Action (1980), the Abuja Treaty (1991), and, of
particular relevance to transport infrastructure, the adoption of the Trans-
African Highway (TAH) concept by the OAU, with the TAH first proposed by
the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) in 1971.
The TAH consists of nine main road corridors with a total length
59,100 km. As originally formulated, the proposal was to construct a network
of all-weather roads of good quality connecting Africa’s capital cities as
Transport Infrastructure 65
A sub-set of the full list of PIDA projects is the Priority Action Programme
(PAP) list of projects which, as the name suggests, are the projects in the
PIDA full list that should be developed and implemented as a priority and
before the other projects in PIDA.
A database (AID – African Infrastructure Database) for PIDA is being devel-
oped to assist in the coordination and implementation of the programme.
The Virtual PIDA Information Centre (VPIC) is the central technology mech-
anism to support monitoring and reporting of regional projects in all RECs.
Stakeholders will access the project data and related reports through the
front-end interface of VPIC, which then becomes the central information
management system for all information related to PIDA projects. With VPIC,
the NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency (NPCA) is able to facilitate
sharing of PIDA-PAP information, promote participation in PIDA implemen-
tation, enable tracking of progress in PIDA implementation, and promote
investment opportunities in PIDA-PAP projects.
VPIC can be accessed via www.au-pida.org. The VIPC software enables the
AID database to be interfaced with the COMESA-EAC-SADC regional infra-
structure database developed by TradeMark Southern Africa.14 The VPIC
also allows users to browse through, search, filter and view the decomposed
projects of the PIDA Priority Action Programme in so-called project fiches,
thus giving the users the needed information on each project and its imple-
mentation status. VPIC allows the RECs to collect information on PIDA-PAP
projects at national and regional levels and to populate AID accordingly,
thus making up-to-date PIDA project information accessible in VPIC. At the
time of writing, project information in the African Infrastructure database is
far from complete but there are a number of programmes supporting the AU
member states, the RECs and NEPAD to collect information on priority infra-
structure projects so that these projects can be prepared and hence moved
towards a stage where they can be financed and implemented.
In 2013–2014, the 51 original PIDA priority infrastructure programmes
were decomposed into 433 discrete projects. Detailed project fiches were
generated for 83 of these projects and documented in reports. In parallel,
the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite has entered just over 600 priority
projects into the Tripartite Regional Infrastructure Projects Database
(TRIPDA; see www.tripartitegis.org). Since TRIPDA offered a consolidated
dataset for four (including IGAD) of the eight RECs, with a combined
membership of 26 countries, but not yet including South Sudan or
Somalia, it made sense to build AID on the back of TRIPDA.
Recently, efforts have been made to review the pipeline of the
433 projects and the list of 83 for which project fiches were generated. These
have been rationalised and cleaned up and the process of mapping the PIDA
and TRIPDA projects has started and is well under way.
Not only have there been great strides made in the technical aspects
of the Programme for Infrastructure Development for Africa, but there
70 Mark Pearson
a soft loan, then these funds could be most usefully applied to reduce risk,
such as using these grant funds or soft loan to reduce debt repayments or as
an equity investment that would give comfort to other investors who are
either providing loans or who are also equity investors. De-risking a project
in this way can make all the difference as to whether or not the project is
‘bankable’ or not.
Building a pipeline of bankable projects is currently being addressed
through PIDA. However, in a paper entitled ‘Unlocking Private Finance
for African Infrastructure,’16 Paul Collier and Colin Meyer make the point
that ‘the combination of political complexity and the lack of African public
sector specialist teams able to prepare projects mean that there is no pipe-
line of projects ready for funding’. The authors suggest a range of strategic
uses of public money in infrastructure financing and conclude that to
generate a pipeline of bankable projects there is a need for catalytic finance
for specialist teams equipped not just with technicians but with political
entrepreneurs who can overcome veto players. There have been attempts
to establish these specialist teams as suggested by Collier and Meyer, such
as the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Task Force’s Project Preparation and
Implementation Unit (PPIU), but these attempts have been half-hearted at
best and lack strong political support from the RECs and the REC member
countries themselves.
The development banks have been developing templates for standard
contracts so, in addressing president Kaberuka’s list of ways to close Africa’s
infrastructure financing gap, this leaves the issue of the present apprehen-
sions of non-African Sovereign Wealth Funds, Pension Funds, and so on to
investing in Africa’s infrastructure. There are a number of recent initiatives
involving the use of public funds to encourage private financiers to invest in
African infrastructure projects such as the Africa50 initiative and the Private
Infrastructure Development Group (PIDG), a multi-donor organisation led
by DFID, the aim of which is to encourage private infrastructure investment
in developing countries using a range of facilities and investment vehicles
which provide varying types of financial, practical and strategic support in
order to realise this objective. Support for infrastructure under the European
Union’s Eleventh European Development Fund will also use blending and
leveraging mechanisms and instruments which should reduce risk and act as
a facility which should encourage inclusion of investments from Sovereign
Wealth Funds, pension funds and other private sector investment funds into
Africa’s infrastructure. However, as Collier and Mayer also note, the inability
of Africa to finance its infrastructure requirements is not a capacity constraint
but an institutional and organisational one and, as such, needs an imagina-
tive approach which goes beyond what has been attempted to date.
There are also other practical constraints that need to be addressed if Africa
is to develop its transport infrastructure to the levels required to support
sustainable economic development. One major issue is how African policy
72 Mark Pearson
done in 1916. The purpose was to reduce the haul distance of copper from
the Copperbelt as the existing railway line followed the watershed through
present-day Zambia and crossed into present-day Zimbabwe at Victoria Falls.
A line from the railhead at Kafue to the railhead at Lions Den would cut
hundreds of kilometres off the journey and hence save money in transport.
Another survey of the ‘short-cut’ route was done in 1932 to shorten the
proposed 1916 route even more, and yet another survey was done in 1953
(because construction of the Kariba Dam necessitated another ‘short-cut’
track realignment) and more studies and surveys have been done since
then.
This infrastructure project was first proposed almost a century ago and
yet construction has not started. The inclusion of this project into PIDA is
presumably on the assumption that there have never been sufficient funds
to construct this railway line, ignoring the fact that this line may no longer
be financially or economically viable or that this proposed route may no
longer be important for DR Congo or Zambia as alternative routes to regional
coastal ports that now exist. The Kafue–Loins Den railway project may, on
the other hand, be financially or economically viable, but there is insuffi-
cient information for this to be determined. This is the case for many PIDA
projects, and if there is insufficient information to do an economic or finan-
cial evaluation it is difficult to prioritise a project. If the project is justified
purely on political or social criteria, then it is unlikely to be bankable; and if
it is not bankable, it is unlikely to be implemented.
Most projects in PIDA are at the concept stage; hence, until there is a
feasibility study done, there is no way of determining whether these
projects are viable. Despite the finances that are being made available for
infrastructure projects, it remains the case that it is difficult to get funding
to do pre-feasibility and feasibility studies. Thus, and to avoid a situation
where NEPAD would have to carry out a multitude of feasibility studies,
NEPAD adopted the PIDA-PAP, which is a sub-set of all PIDA projects that
have been developed beyond the concept stage. Using the parlance of
PIDA, PIDA-PAP projects should be classified as being at the S2 or S3 project
preparation stage (where S1 = early concept proposal; S2 = feasibility/needs
assessment; S3 = programme/project structuring and promotion to obtain
financing; S3/S4 = financing and roll out; and S4 = implementation and
operation). If a project is classified as being in the S1 stage, it is unlikely
that it will be ready for implementation within the next five–seven years,
and if a project is in the S4 stage, it will, most likely, already have secured
financing. Therefore, by definition, projects in the PIDA-PAP have had
a feasibility study done and so have been a priority project possibly for
quite some time. However, given the rapid changes taking place in Africa,
and advances being made in engineering techniques, unless the feasibility
study has been done in the recent past, it may no longer be valid and may
need to be redone.
Transport Infrastructure 75
Conclusion
Notes
1. Study on Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) Phase III
PIDA Study Synthesis. Prepared in September 2011 for the African Development
Bank, NEPAD, and the African Union Commission by a consortium headed by
SOFRECO.
2. Vivien Foster and Cecilia Briceño-Garmendia, Africa Infrastructure Country
Diagnostic Report. World Bank.
3. http://www.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/pdf/2014-MT/20140923-Kaberuka-Transcript.
pdf.
4. R. Schiere and A. Rugamba, ‘Chinese Infrastructure Investments and African
Integration’, AfDB Working Paper 127, May 2011.
5. For a detailed analysis of the trends in external support to the African infrastruc-
ture sector, see ibid.
6. Review of the Implementation Status of the Trans-African Highways and the
Missing Links: Volume 1: Main Report. Africa Development Bank (SWECO
INTERNATIONAL/NCG/UNICONSULT/BNEDT), 2003.
7. For a map of the proposed Trans-African Highways, see: http://mapsof.net/map/
map-of-trans-african-highways.
78 Mark Pearson
79
80 Nicholas J.W. Kühne
the consumer doesn’t pay grudgingly. But this attitude is slowly changing,
and increasingly, local brands are now beginning to offer a similar degree of
confidence to consumers, thereby creating a genuine threat to established
multi-national brands.
Wunderbrand, a company dealing with branding in Africa, refers to 1950s
American style advertising campaigns when considering up and coming
consumers. A major insight discerned by Wunderbrand is the phenomenon
of ‘firsts’ in many African countries with emerging economies – the first trip
to a cinema, first microwave oven, first credit card or first restaurant experi-
ence; many of the middle class and basic needs consumers are beginning to
experience activities, products and services for the very first time.
Because new consumers require educating, education is the first and most
important element when marketing a product. A brand which understands
this clearly is Nando’s. Many years ago, Nando’s subtly promoted their
offering as a ‘first restaurant experience’ for the new up and coming middle
class in South Africa – migrating up from takeaway chicken meals like KFC
(international brand) and Chicken Licken (local).
The impact of international brands in Africa during the past hundred years
or so is clear. Unilever, Nestlé and others have cornered the lion’s share in
many consumer markets in Africa and continue to grow their footprint as
they seek new markets.
However, there are many local brands with strong positions in local
markets and more of them are beginning to expand in their local territories
while also branching out into neighbouring countries. This is resulting in a
tougher time for multi-nationals, as strong indigenous brands begin to make
their mark.
There are many positive spin-offs from this growth in African brands.
Throughout Africa there are legacy brands that form part of the day-to-day
purchases by local consumers. These include the obvious international brands
such as Coca-Cola, PZ Cussons and Unilever. In the past few decades, local
fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) brands have been actively competing
with international brands. The monopolies colonial and other foreign
interests were able to establish in the continent for most of the previous
century meant that most if not all branded products were imported or set
up by British, American, French or Portuguese companies. An example is
Lever Brothers (now Unilever) who started operations in Nigeria in 1923 and
now owns large swathes of market share in all of the sectors it operates in.
The Growth of Continental African Brands 81
An exciting aspect of this is that ‘Made in Africa’ has very limited connota-
tions. Unlike the Chinese experience of changing the perception of ‘Made in
China’ to ‘Created in China’, Africa is in the enviable position of being able
to create its own story around its products.
However, it should not be forgotten that Africa is not a homogenous conti-
nent. Kenya is known for producing splendid teas, and Ethiopia as the origi-
nator of coffee; for gold and diamonds, think South Africa, and for exotic
spices and textiles, Morocco.
The 2013 Brand Africa 100 Most Admired and Valuable Brands in Africa
report delivered some interesting results showing that African brands are
making headway at 34 per cent of all the brands nominated in the survey,
with international brands steady at 66 per cent. A further breakdown of the
African results indicate that South African brands represent 24 per cent of
the share, Nigerian brands represent 9 per cent with Kenyan brands repre-
senting the remaining 1 per cent.
Conclusion
to open up borders and ease trade restrictions. There are many advantages of
being a home-grown brand, but it does not guarantee success. There is only
a short window for smaller African companies to make the move from being
products to becoming brands. International companies who are desperate for
new markets and revenue have the skills and drive to overtake local brands,
so before this happens, a BRAND new Africa is needed.
Note
1. Deloitte, March 2013, http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-India/Local%20
Assets/Documents/Africa/Deloitte_on_Africa-(1)_rise_and_rise.pdf.
6
Is It Time for Open Borders in
Southern Africa? The Case for Free
Labour Movement in SADC
Adrian Kitimbo
85
86 Adrian Kitimbo
The debate over free movement in SADC is often hijacked by populist senti-
ments. Inter-regional labour movement tends to evoke security concerns, as
well as the fear of a ‘flood’ of migrants to major receiving countries such as
Botswana. The eruption of xenophobic attacks against Zimbabweans and
other foreign African nationals in South Africa in 2008 highlights the diffi-
culties in promoting a balanced discussion on free labour movement.
Against this backdrop, this Discussion Paper draws from interviews with
migration experts to explore some of the potential economic benefits of free
labour mobility for both sending and receiving countries in SADC. Mindful
of the possible drawbacks of increased labour movement such as brain drain
and the dampening of wages for particularly low-skilled workers, migra-
tion experts such as Lorenzo Fioramonti7 nevertheless argue that a ‘regional
governance framework’ that allows for a multilateral approach to develop-
ment can limit some of these problems. The paper also draws on the EU
experience as well as the migration policies of two other African RECs –
ECOWAS and the EAC – in an effort to draw lessons for SADC.
just unsustainable in the face of growing numbers, but also hinder economic
opportunities that are associated with free movement of persons, including
labour.
problems for SADC members. The regional SADC economy would be better
served by a coherent and implemented regional policy on labour migration
than it is with the current practice of trying to continually limit it.
sectors. Even more, societies with an ageing workforce have been able to
expand their shrinking labour force by drawing from a larger labour market.
A recent study of inter-regional migrants in EU cities shows how places such
as Turin, Italy, have capitalised on Romanian immigrants to fill gaps in sectors
that some locals consider undesirable. These include agriculture, construc-
tion and domestic work.33 Similar trends are seen in Hamburg, Germany,
where foreigners are increasingly taking up jobs in sectors including the port
industry.34 Yet the supply of labour across the EU also extends to skilled
sectors such as engineering and medicine. Germany, for example, has in
recent years hired thousands to Spaniards and Portuguese to make up its
shortfall of engineers and other professionals.35 As the examples illustrate,
because of free labour movement in the EU, countries experience less
economically stinging skills shortages. Increased intra-regional mobility in
SADC for specifically high-skilled workers can have similar resultant effects.
Companies in countries such as South Africa would struggle less to fill avail-
able vacancies as there would be a larger pool of candidates with the right
skills to select from.
Beyond tackling skills shortages, free labour movement has the poten-
tial to boost trade. In regions such as SADC, where intra-SADC trade as a
percentage of the community’s total trade has stagnated at around 15 per
cent over the past decade,36 an increase in mobile labour could enhance
trade. Migration studies suggest two ways by which the movement of
persons can improve trade. It is argued that migrants can reduce bilateral
business costs between the host and sending countries. This is achieved
through personal business connections with people from home coun-
tries.37 Secondly, the specific knowledge that migrants bring about foreign
markets can also lessen the cost of trade between countries. In cases where
the political and social institutions of a foreign state are very different
from that of the host state, the knowledge that migrants bring can prove
especially useful.38 Indeed, if a country possesses a significant number of
ethnicities, the information on markets provided by these communities
can spur trade between countries.
Another issue that is worth mentioning as part of the potential economic
gains is the ability of increased labour mobility to reduce irregular migrants.
Irregular migrants are people who enter host countries through illegal chan-
nels and without proper documentation. Presently, host countries spend
enormous amounts of money on tightening border controls and in the depor-
tation of undocumented migrants. South Africa and Botswana are perhaps
two countries with the highest influx of these migrants. Other regional
countries such as Namibia and Mozambique have also experienced a rise in
undocumented workers. It is also important to highlight that the majority
of irregular migrants in SADC are from within the region. In both Botswana
and South Africa, most undocumented migrants who enter their territories
have their origins in Zimbabwe, a country where harsh economic realities
Open Borders in Southern Africa? 91
have forced millions to look for work in other countries within the region
and beyond.39 It is estimated that since 1990, South Africa has deported
over one and a half million people, most of them back to Zimbabwe and
Mozambique.40 Yet deportations and border controls do not seem to have
the desired effect of preventing and deterring irregular migrants, as many
desperate people often find clandestine channels to re-enter destination
countries. According to Lorenzo Fioramonti,41 the lack of free labour move-
ment has facilitated the growth of irregular entry channels to host states,
which are often managed by traffickers.42 Recent reports reveal that traf-
fickers financially exploit those who use their services, as well as physically
abuse them.43 In addition, because irregular labour migrants cannot work in
formal sectors, they often take up employment in conditions where labour
standards are not observed and are paid very low wages. Additionally, skilled
labour migrants who could be of benefit in high-skilled sectors within host
countries end up in jobs way below their skill levels. A managed regional
labour migration regime that allows for the free movement of particularly
high-skilled workers can help reduce the number of irregular migrants in the
region and the problems that come with it. Furthermore, tackling irregular
migration through an increase in the mobility of workers could also reduce
‘brain waste’ by enabling un-regularised skilled migrants to move into indus-
tries where they can best employ their skills.
But the benefits of free labour movement are not just limited to host states.
An outflow of workers can reduce unemployment rates in sending countries,
and remittances sent back home can be a source of foreign exchange as well
as economically improve the lives of those left behind. In Zimbabwe, for
example, remittances from abroad are credited with staving off a complete
economic collapse in recent years. In addition, in case of return, the skills
migrants gain abroad can prove useful in the sender’s labour market.
From this, it may seem like free labour movement is a win-win situa-
tion for all parties involved. Overall, its benefits do clearly outweigh the
costs. However, it also important to highlight some of the drawbacks from
an increase in inter-regional labour mobility, as it helps in understanding
why some countries are reluctant to embrace it. The threat of immigrants
competing for jobs with locals is a real fear in host states. Joe Rispoli44 stresses
that in regions such as Southern Africa, where unemployment rates especially
among low-skilled workers are high, an increase in labour movement arouses
serious concerns over jobs. Moreover, if foreigners work for lower pay, this
may dampen the wages for local workers, creating tensions between the two
groups as a result. And while remittances are of significant benefit to coun-
tries of origin, brain drain and the possibility of losing people of the working
age could have negative economic repercussions for sending countries. It is
also possible that large outflows of labour from the least developed to the
more developed countries in SADC may create labour shortages in countries
of origin, stunting their economic growth as result. Some of these problems
92 Adrian Kitimbo
The first Draft Protocol on free movement in SADC was proposed in 1995.
It was an ambitious Protocol that sought to gradually eliminate obstacles
to free movement among member states within a period of ten years.46 It
was crafted in alignment with the African Union’s objective of eventually
building an ‘African Regional Economic Community’ where there would
be free movement throughout the continent.47 More specifically, the 1995
Protocol set out, in relation to every citizen of a member state, to ‘confer,
promote, and protect onto SADC citizens (i) the right to freely enter another
Member State for a short visit without needing a visa (ii) the right to reside in
the territory of another Member State (iii) the right to establish oneself and
work in the territory of a Member State’.48
However, this rather ambitious Protocol was never adopted, as SADC
countries, including South Africa, Namibia and Botswana, rejected it. The
idea that there would be free movement of persons in a region that was then
seen as having enormous economic disparities did not bode well with some
members.49 Also, concerns over the potential for free movement to usurp
national policies, as well as socially and economically burden receiving
countries, were a big influence on the decision by a number of members
to reject the Draft Protocol.50After successfully thwarting the 1995 Draft
Protocol, South Africa crafted a new version and titled it the ‘Facilitation
of Movement Protocol’. The new Protocol, among other things, sought to
assert national interests over those of the Region, prevent countries from
committing to an implementation time-table, as well as delay harmonisation
of policies.51 However, this version was seen as a significant step backwards
by some SADC members and was hence not adopted. Following
the rejection of the Facilitation Protocol presented by South Africa, the
Open Borders in Southern Africa? 93
secretariat redrafted the original Protocol, taking into account the concerns
of member states, but kept the name proposed by South Africa – ‘Facilitation
of Movement’.
The Facilitation of Movement Protocol seeks to progressively eliminate
obstacles to movement among and within SADC member states and facili-
tate entry of citizens into a second country visa-free for a maximum period
of three months.52 The SADC Charter of Fundamental Social Rights supports
the Protocol with regard to the free movement of labour. Article 2 of the
Charter seeks to ‘promote policies, practices and measures, which facilitate
labour mobility, remove distortions in labour markets and enhance industrial
harmony and increase productivity, in SADC Member States’.53 After being
shelved for many years, the Facilitation of Movement Protocol was finally
tabled in 2005 at the SADC Summit. Presently, thirteen SADC member states
have signed and adopted it. But only six members (South Africa, Zambia,
Lesotho, Mozambique, Botswana and Swaziland) have ratified it. For the
Protocol to come into force, it has to be signed and ratified by at least two-
thirds of SADC members.
Factors limiting the ratification of the Protocol include lack of funding
and technical expertise required to put it into force.54 Implementation
requires funding administrative practices and making policy changes. For
some SADC members, the Protocol is seen as both an extra burden and not
really a priority. This is especially the case in countries such as the DRC who
are struggling with internal conflicts among other social and economic chal-
lenges. Harmonisation of laws, which requires modifications in domestic
laws as well as subordinating national political interests to long-term regional
goals, is also not regarded as much of a priority by some SADC states. In addi-
tion, present bilateral agreements also contribute to a reluctance to ratify the
Protocol.55 Because some countries already have strong bilateral ties which
allow their citizens to move freely, the Protocol is not seen as contributing
much. The failure of SADC to implement the ‘Protocol on Facilitation of
Movement’ is also attributed to a lack of commitment and political will to
embrace policies on labour movement.56 Other African RECs, as the figures
demonstrate, have taken much faster steps toward opening up borders for
member citizens.
SADC can begin with harmonising labour movement policies among member
states. The EAC, for example, already had relatively uniform labour move-
ment policies between partner states. In SADC, current policies vary from
one country to another. One example of this is the procedures for granting
work permits which are different in every country. This lack of uniformity
makes the process of applying for work permits confusing and extremely
cumbersome for those who wish to work in another member state. The
recently adopted Regional Labour Migration Policy Framework is a step in
Open Borders in Southern Africa? 95
the right direction. If all member countries do indeed implement its objec-
tives, the Framework will ensure that national labour migration policies are
harmonised throughout the entire region.
SADC should also strive to gain the full support of its members to finally
bring the ‘Facilitation of Movement Protocol’ into force. One way of enabling
this is to pool technical expertise and resources to help those countries that
have not ratified the Protocol because they lack the know-how and resources
to domesticate its provisions.
More communication between the Ministries of Labour and Home Affairs is
also needed if the Protocol is to garner full support. Joni Musabayana, the Deputy
Director of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in South Africa, spoke
about the tension that often exists between the security concerns of Home Affairs
and the labour needs of Labour Ministries.58 These competing interests have
played a role in stifling progress toward free labour movement in the region.
Dialogue between these Ministries is significant to ensure that the security
concerns of SADC countries are addressed, while at the same time allowing for
the free movement of labour that is economically beneficial to member states.
Furthermore, unlike the EAC and the ECOWAS, SADC seems to lack the
same sense of urgency and political will to enable free labour movement
96 Adrian Kitimbo
Conclusion
This chapter illustrates that there are several potential economic benefits
from increased labour mobility within SADC. Free labour movement has the
potential to address skills shortages, reduce the number of undocumented
Open Borders in Southern Africa? 97
migrants and also enhance trade within the region. While the drawbacks
from such labour mobility including brain drain and the dampening of local
wages cannot be overlooked, these problems can be addressed through a
managed regional labour migration system that, for example, initially allows
for the free movement of workers with particular skills (e.g., high-skilled
workers).
Conditions do exist to finally establish free labour movement in SADC. A
Regional Labour Migration Framework that would allow for the harmonisa-
tion of labour migration policies across the region is already in place. It is
incumbent on member states to implement what is set out in the Framework.
A protocol to facilitate free movement, including labour, also already exists.
More political will as well as the pooling together of technical expertise
and resources are required to finally bring the Facilitation of Movement
Protocol into force. And, as stated earlier, successful implementation of the
protocol (when it finally comes into force) requires a closer working rela-
tionship between the Ministries of Labour and Ministries of Home Affairs
in individual SADC countries to ensure that the concerns and needs of both
Ministries are met. Furthermore, a united voice from the private sector and
a stronger working relationship with the public sector could also go a long
way in enabling free labour movement in the region.
If SADC wishes to strengthen its integration, as well as collectively address
the economic imbalances in the region, the migration-development nexus
cannot be forever avoided. Other African RECs, including ECOWAS and EAC,
show that even among regions where there are significant economic dispari-
ties among neighbours, free labour movement is possible and can be bene-
ficial. While SADC does have a few strong economies such as South Africa
and Botswana, most of its members have weak economies and markets. These
economies cannot grow in isolation. More regional integration, through
increased labour mobility, can generate the impetus needed to solve the socio-
economic problems this region faces.
Notes
1. See http://www.adcorp.co.za/NEws/Pages/SA%E2%80%99seconomydesperatelyne
edshigh- skilledworkers.aspx.
2. See http://businesstech.co.za/news/general/52918/south-africas-critical-skills-
shortage/.
3. See Ibid.
4. At http://sun.com.na/content/national-news/skills-shortage-biggest-obstacle-growth.
5. Bertelsmann Stiftung, ‘The Case for Harnessing European Labour Mobility: Scenario
Analysis and Policy Recommendations’ (2014), http://www.labourmobility.com/
wp- content/uploads/2014/04/HELM.pdf.
6. European Commission, ‘Evaluation of the Impact of the Free Movement of EU
Citizens at Local Level’ (2014), http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/dg_just_
eva_free_mov_final_report_27.01.14.pdf.
98 Adrian Kitimbo
38. Munz et al., ‘What Are the Migrants’ Contributions to Employment and
Growth?’
39. Crush and Williams, ‘Labour Migration Trends and Policies in Southern Africa’.
40. Ibid.
41. Fioramonti, ‘Is It Time to Take Free Movement of People in Southern Africa
Seriously?’
42. Ibid.
43. International Organization for Migration (IOM), http://www.iom.int/cms/en/
sites/iom/home/where-we-work/africa-and-the-middle-east/southern-africa.html.
44. Interview with Joe Rispoli, International Organization for Migration (IOM), 21
May 2014.
45. See http://www.opendemocracy.net/chris-nshimbi/state-of-denial.
46. Hussein Solomon, ‘Toward the Free Movement of People in Southern Africa?’,
Institute for Security Studies (1997), http://www.issafrica.org/uploads/paper_
18.pdf.
47. Solomon ‘Toward the Free Movement of People in Southern Africa?’ (1997).
48. Draft Protocol on the Free Movement of Persons in SADC, http://www.unisa.ac.za/
contents/faculties/law/docs/FACILITATION_OF_MOVEMENT_OF_PERSONS_
SADC_1996.pdf.
49. V. Williams and L. Carr, ‘The Draft Protocol on the Facilitation of Movement of
Persons in SADC: Implications for State Parties’, Migration Policy Brief No. 18,
2006.
50. Williams and Carr, ‘The Draft Protocol on the Facilitation of Movement of Persons
in SADC’.
51. Nshimbi and Fioramonti, ‘A Region without Borders?’
52. Protocol on the Facilitation of Movement in SADC, http://www.sadc.int/
files/9513/5292/8363/Protocol_on_Facilitation_of_Movement_of_Persons2005.pdf.
53. Charter of Fundamental and Social Rights, http://www.sadc.int/files/6613/
5292/8383/Charter_of_the_Fundamental_Social_Rights_in_SADC2003.pdf.
54. Interview with Joni Musabayana, Deputy Director, International Labour
Organization (ILO), South Africa, 25 July 2014.
55. Informal Interview with Zaheera Jinnah, migration expert at University of
Witwatersrand, 23 May 2014.
56. Nshimbi and Fioramonti, ‘A Region without Borders?’
57. Ibid.
58. Interview with Joni Musabayana, Deputy Director, International Labour Organization,
South Africa, 25 July 2014.
59. Interview with Loane Sharp, Labour Market Specialist at Adcorp, 23 July 2014.