Seminar Setting: Objectives
Seminar Setting: Objectives
The Philippine Association of Social Workers, Inc. in cooperation with the Japanese
Coordinating Body for the International Federation of Social Workers spearheaded a
National Seminar Workshop on Building Resiliency in the Face of Disasters on March 2-4,
2016 at Ponce de Leon Garden Resort, Puerto Princesa City, Philippines. This worthwhile
endeavor was coordinated by a team of visionaries and organizations bound by common
goals to spread awareness about disaster risk management and develop resilience among
people.
We target 100 participants from Philippines and other IFSW-AP member countries.
Participants are from different organizations including from local government units that
have experiences in working in emergency response on providing psychosocial support.
Target participants are social workers who are practitioners, lecturers, researchers and
decision makers.
Overview
Disasters continue to hit different parts of the globe. Hundreds if not thousands of
people reportedly perished or family survivors were faced with the trauma and anguish of
having lost lives, properties and livelihood. Government officials were caught unprepared
to deal with the massive destructions wrought by a disaster. Helping professionals were not
spared yet they had to continue fulfilling their mission albeit attending to their own grief
and loss.
OBJECTIVES
The Conference broadly aims to provide a venue for the sharing of experiences, lessons and
insights among the participants on how best to better prepare and deal with any type of
disaster. More specifically, it seeks to:
1. Review and get updates on global, regional and national humanitarian standards
and policies in responding to disasters;
3. Draw implications and insights on the different disaster response approaches and
strategies; and
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Prof. Noboyuki Kataoka related how Japan recovered from one of the most
devastating catastrophes in the history of East Japan. His talk focused on the
fundamental importance of people’s resilience in disasters. According to him, the
Japanese government undertook measures to keep its people safe by moving their
houses far from the seaboard. But this was not through overnight. They also faced
local residents’ resistance from being relocated to the temporary makeshift
apartments.
Based on researches and surveys, these measures were not all successful.
Majority of the victims resisted relocation mainly because they don’t want to
abandon their cherished communities. However, one remarkable strategy that they
employed was the construction of a new community. The organization and structure
of this community are based on the interesting ideas of the affected communities
themselves.
Disaster risk represents the potential for hazards to cause adverse effects on
our life; health; economic well-being; social, environmental, and cultural assets;
infrastructure; and the services expected from the government and environment.
Thus NDRRMC’s programs and activities which are systematically divided into
four thematic areas such as (1) disaster prevention and mitigation, (2) disaster
preparedness, (3) disaster response, and (4) disaster rehabilitation and recovery aim
to reduce and manage disaster-related hazards. The council continuously improves
its programs to meet the demands of disaster risk reduction in each community and
in the country as a whole.
This project may seem new but it has significantly assisted the government in
disaster risk management. Their most notable contribution is the creation of the
hazard maps which keep the public abreast on the developments regarding potential
disasters. These maps provide storm surge, flood and landslide warnings.
Reyes stated that Project NOAH uses internet-based technology for public
access. Using the information from hazard maps, LGUs were able to respond
quickly to typhoon Yolanda. He also said that hazard maps were not made to bring
about panic but to equip people and enable them grasp relevant information and
prepare them for disasters.
The keynote person on this topic, Oneida Olive T. Pagaduan, started her
focus on enumerating types of disaster namely natural, man-made, technological
Lastly, she reiterated that a social worker should strengthen and develop the
ability of the person to cope and control the outcomes as reflected in his/her self-
worth and effectiveness. In general, people and community show remarkable
resilience that generates optimism but must not allow complacency.
Prof. Machiko Ohara, said that it is inevitable that in the face of disasters, we
experience loss in different forms – loss of property, livelihood, family and loved
ones. Her talk about the “resilience during ambiguous loss” highlighted the role of
social work in helping those who suffered from ambiguous loss to survive and regain
basic needs. By means of intensive and systematically planned social work activities
and supporting community resilience, the psychological burdens generated by
disasters are lessened.
She cited the 3S Housing Project specifically assisting the people who were
affected by the great Eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami. This program
primarily targeted to provide security, safety and stability for them to sustain a
decent life with sufficient resources. She further stressed that to be able to help an
individual to turn an ambiguous loss to resiliency, the following principles should be
considered; meaning of life, control, identity, ambivalence, attachment and hope.
The speaker, Col. Luis Marciano Polido Navera of the Philippine Air Force,
stated that Asia is the region most at risk of disasters. To substantiate this fact, he
presented the taxonomy of natural hazards in the Philippines. He also pointed out
the damages brought about by cyclones, landslides, tsunami and other natural
disasters.
In the light of disaster response, he pointed out that these three components
should be clearly identified – disaster, vulnerability and capacities. He also
explained how disaster risk reduction management activities are divided into three
phases; before disaster, during, disaster, and after disaster. The Principle of
Crocodile was also in this focus, it is imperative to identify the risk which is
represented by a crocodile. After which, the risk must be evaluated to fully
Hon. Jesus S. Far, a Child Protection Specialist, centered his talk on policies
and programs for child protection concerning disaster response. He pointed out
deplorable condition of children in a disaster-stricken community. Some of these are
child labor and prostitution, human trafficking, poor health and sanitation, violence
and the like.
According to him, the biggest barrier that social workers are facing is the
lack of awareness or lack of attention towards people with vulnerability/disability.
In this manner, he further stressed that all vulnerable people must be involved in all
phases of disaster risk reduction management. Likewise, people with disabilities or
impairments must be able to easily access information and receive specific support
during and post disasters. Knowing the vulnerability of the community will help
design a specific program of social services most needed in that disaster-affected
area.
Lt. Col. Mark Anthony Fernandez opened his topic by recalling devastating
disasters that landed in the Philippines and caused trauma and chaos. He stated the
agency’s (Philippine Air Force) mission; conduct air search and rescue operations in
support of the AFP (Armed Forces of the Philippines) and civilian agency.
He further discussed that the agency conducts search and rescue operations,
air evacuation, air drop of supplies & equipment. Likewise it also conducts para
rescue training and performs field and organizational maintenance of assigned
aircraft and related systems. He proudly announced the agency’s newly acquired
and recent air assets to better perform rescue and retrieval operations.
In relation to this, he enumerated capabilities and rescue operations of PAF
namely: air, water, rope, collapsed structure search and road accident to elevate
national resilience. He ended his topic with a quotation “Your angels of mercy….
Relentless in saving and rebuilding lives…. That others may live…...”
The speaker, Ronnie A. Santos, pointed out that Water, Sanitation and
Hygiene (WASH) is one of the integral components of disaster response. Since
children are most affected in the disaster prone areas, WASH program should be
given priority.
To promote this program, DepEd Order No.10 series of 2016 was authored.
This pertains to the policy and guidelines for the comprehensive water, sanitation
and hygiene in school’s program. With knowledge about WASH related diseases
like diarrhea, cholera, HIV/AIDS and intestinal worms, priority interventions
should be made to address these problems. WASH programs would be most helpful
to children in disaster prone areas to secure health and hygiene.
Emerging Insights
One way to reduce the impacts of disasters on the nation and its communities is to
invest in enhancing resilience. As defined in this report, resilience is the ability to prepare
and plan for, absorb, recover from, and more successfully adapt to adverse events.
Enhanced resilience allows better anticipation of disasters and better planning to reduce
disaster losses—rather than waiting for an event to occur and paying for it afterward.
However, building the culture and practice of disaster resilience is not simple or
inexpensive. Decisions about how and when to invest in increasing resilience involve short-
and long-term planning and investments of time and resources prior to an event. Although
the resilience of individuals and communities may be readily recognized after a disaster,
resilience is currently rarely acknowledged before a disaster takes place, making the
“payoff” for resilience investments challenging for individuals, communities, the private
sector, and all levels of government to demonstrate.
Implications
The seminar identified four significant implications during this session. These implications
are outlined below.
2. Every individual and community in the nation has access to the risk and
vulnerability information they need to make their communities more resilient. This
enables them to further improve preparedness and response operations and rebuild
disoriented communities.
3. Proactive investments and policy decisions reduce loss of lives, costs, and socio
economic impacts of future disasters.
1:30-2:30 p.m. Project NOAH (National Operational Dir. Alfredo Mahar Francisco
Assessment of Hazards) Lagmay
Represented by Mariano Raphael
Reyes
4:10-4:45 Building Local Capacity towards Disaster- Japan Coordinating Body for
Resilient Communities IFSW - membership
9:00-10:00 Sphere and the Humanitarian Accountability Col. Luis Marciano Polido Naver
Partnership: A Global Framework for Disaster PAF (GSC)
Response Deputy Wing Commander, 570th
Composite Tactical Wing
4:30-5:00 Air Component in Disaster Rescue Operations LTC. Felix Balanza (MNSA) PAF
7:00-8:00 Dinner
Nobuyuki KATAOKA
Biographical Sketch
LL.M., Graduate School of Law and Politics, Osaka University;
Master of Arts (Sociology): Graduate School of Social Sciences, State
University of New York at Binghamton
AT PRESENT
Associate Professor, Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Social
Welfare, Shikoku Gakuin University
EDUCATION:
M.A. in Anthropology, University of the Philippines, Quezon City:
2014-present
AT PRESENT:
Information Officer III, DOST Nationwide
Education:
-Community Development Worker, College of Social Work and
Community Development, University of the Philippines, Diliman,
Quezon City from 2015 to present;
-Doctor of Social Development (on-going), College of Social Work
and Community Development, University of the Philippines,
Diliman, Quezon City from 1998-2000;
-Masters in Community Development, College of Social Work and
Community Development, University of the Philippines, Diliman,
Quezon City from 1997-1998;
-Diploma in Community Development, Immaculate Conception
School of Theology, Vigan City, Ilocos Sur from 1995-1997;
-Spiritual Formation Year-Bachelor in Sacred Theology (units), Mary
Help of Christians College Seminary, Dagupan City, Pangasinan from
1991-1995
-Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy, College of Social Work and
Community Development, University of the Philippines, Diliman,
Quezon City from 1998-2000.
Madeline G. CAYANAN
Education:
- Master in Public Administration at Palawan State University, 1993-
1995 (undergraduate, academic requirements completed);
-Master in Guidance and Couselling at Holy Trinity University, (12
units), 1991-1992
-Bachelor of Science in Social Work at Philippine Christian
University, 1974-1978.
Rosauro R. LUNTAYAO
Employment:
-Sustainability and Development Manager at International Container
Terminal Services Inc. from September 2015 to present;
-Social Work Faculty at Centro Escolar University from Jan. 1998 to
present
-Program Development Manager at Habitat for Humanity Foundation
Inc. Philippines from July 2012 to Sept. 2015;
-Manager, Corporate Social Responsibility at Roxas Holdings, Inc.
from 1986-2012.
Education:
-Academic Units (Ph.D. in Development Policy) at Dela Salle
University, Manila
-M.A. Psychology at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila
-Certificate in Corporate Community Relation, Wallace CAroll
School of Management, Boston College, Boston Massachusetts
-Bachelor of Science in Social Work (Dean’s List) at Pamantasan ng
Lungsod ng Maynila.
Ronnie A. SANTOS, RN
Attached herewith is the list of individuals who participated in the 3-day Seminar
Workshop.
Appendix D: Organizations
Below is the list of organizations that were represented in the 3-day Seminar Workshop.
Gilbert D. Aniar
Faculty
Palawan National School
From left: Jerwin T. Navarro, Machiko Ohara, Jesus S. Far, Noboyuki Kataoka, Vilma B. Cabrera, Eva P.
Ponce de Leon, Anita T. Leyson, Rosauro R. Luntayao, and Jesus Nate Pagorogo strike a pose after the
first day’s events ended.