Exercise 1
Exercise 1
2. A Moral Dilemma
Two shipwrecked people were struggling in the water. One was holding on to a
plank and the other swimming towards it. The plank would not keep two
people afloat, so the one who had reached the plank first pushed back the
other, who subsequently drowned. The survivor was accused of murder and
tried in court. Was he guilty or not guilty? Explain your answer.
For me, the survivor is not guilty. It should not be expected of the survivor to
sacrifice his life or bear the misfortune of death if he does have a
reasonable chance of surviving.
3. Should parents monitor teens’ social media activities? Why or why not?
For me, it is acceptable. The thing is, it is not technically a crime to give
someone the death penalty. Yes, it is killing someone, but it is not on the
same level as a civilian killing a civilian. Basically, as a society, we agreed
that the only people who have the right to take a human life are those
overseeing the judicial court cases, or those who decide the punishments.
Therefore, a civilian killing another civilian is a crime, yet giving someone
the death penalty means that they've committed actions bad enough to
deserve death, and so that is their punishment.
5. Choose one among the cases of ethnocentrism below and briefly describe.
You may cite examples.
for the way they eat, but don’t have a moral reason for this.