Language As A Divisive Factor
Language As A Divisive Factor
Description of Module
The communication is essential for human beings. Interactions among people are
possible because of communication. Language facilitates to communicate. Thus
language forms a very important part in human life. Every human society has its,
own language. Indian society is a unique society. India is a land of linguistic
diversities. There are many languages in India. It is considered that Sanskrit is the
mother of all Indian languages. After independence the government felt that the
best way of reorganizing states was on the basis of language.
Administrative units: Initially the country was divided into administrative units to A, B and
C Categories. This was found unsatisfactory and hence another category ‘D’ was added. But
people believed that this division negative the principle of equal rights guaranteed to all
the growing demand for formation of states on the basis of linguistic political pressure for
establishing linguistic states. The government of India was bound by the public opinion for
division of states on linguistic basis. In the Telugu area communists set up the slogan
“Andhra for Telugus”. Similarly Marathi speaking people wanted a separate state. Gujarat is
claimed a separate state for themselves. Sikhs demanded a state for themselves. Thus in order
to meet the demands of public, states was reorganized on the basis of language.
225 distinct : The languages of India are many. Linguistic surveys show a list of 225
distinct languages. Sardar Vallab Bahi Patel, played a significant role in amalgamating the
states into Union of India. In 1956 the states were reorganized on the basis of language.
National language Hindi : At present Hindi has been recognised as the national language.
This has given rise to a lot of fighting particularly in the southern part. Though the
Constituent Assembly accepted Hindi as the official language there was a prolonged
controversy. Even at present Hindi is not very much accepted by the South Indians.
Problems: Linguism in India gained momentum during freedom struggle. The freedom
fighters felt that the British system of division of the country was not appropriate. The idea of
division of India on the basis of languages was considered as a better strategy. But the reform
1. Regionalism:
Linguism has promoted local identity. It has created distinctiveness among people. The
Language has evoked psychological and emotional feelings among people. Politicians are
promoting the spread of only particular languages through monetary inducements. They
about the regional gains, than the interest of the nation. Thus interstate boundary dispute,
Linguism has resulted in the formation of regional political parties. At the present juncture
these regional parties are playing a crucial role in the formation of government at the
centre and also at some states. This has caused the Problem of political instability in the
Extreme sense of Linguism has caused linguistic conflicts. Such conflicts are quite often
supported by politicians. E.g: Demand for a separate state by people of “north Karnataka”
region.
6. Threat to sovereignty:
Linguism is posing a severe threat to the integrity of the country. On the basis of language
people have become more self centered without thinking of the progress of the country. In
Some states the regional language is being used even for administrative purposes, which
causes a major problem to people who do not belong to that particular state.
In 1983, Sarkaria Commission was constituted to look in to the language problem in India
and suggest measures. The Commission was headed by R.S. Sarkaria. The Commission made
1. Three language formula: It included the implementation of regional language, Hindi and
English at the school level education.
Ex:South covered by Telugu and Malayalam, East covered by Bengali and Assames and
North covered by Hindi and Punjabi west covered by Hindi, Gujarati and Marathi and central
India is speaking Hindi.
National language: The constitution and various other government documents are purposely
vague in defining such terms as national languages and official languages and in
distinguishing either one from officially adopted regional languages.
States are free: to adopt their own language of administration and educational instruction
from among the country's officially recognized languages, the Scheduled Languages. All
citizens have the right to primary education in their native tongue.
Sole official national language: As drafted, the constitution provided that Hindi and English
were to be the languages of communication for the central government until 1965, when the
switch to Hindi was mandated. The Official Languages Act of 1963, pursuing this mandate,
said that Hindi would become the sole official national language in 1965. English, however,
would continue as an "associate additional official language."
Minority in their traditional homeland: The violence that broke out in the state of Assam
in the early 1980s reflected the complexities of linguistic. (The state has a significant number
of Bengali-speaking Muslims. The Muslims came in response to a British-initiated
colonization plan to bring under cultivation land left fallow by the Assamese. By the 1931
census, the Assamese not only had lost a bulky portion of their land but also had become a
disadvantaged minority in their traditional homeland. They represented less than 33 percent
of the total population of Assam, and the Muslim immigrants (who accounted for roughly 25
percent of the population) dominated commerce and the government bureaucracy.
Linguistic Reorganization of States
Centre state relations: The process of linguistic reorganization of states in India was far
more prolonged and divisive than the controversy over the official language of India and
raised more fundamental questions of centre state relations. The first step in the process
occurred in the aftermath of a major movement in the Andhra region of the old Madras
Presidency. Following the States Reorganization Act of 1956, the boundaries of the southern
states was reorganized in closer conformity with traditional linguistic regions.
Ex: The bifurcation of Bombay province into the present state of Gujarat and Maharashtra
followed in 1960. In 1966, Punjab was reorganized and its several parts distributed
among three units: the core Punjabi Suba, the new state of Haryana, and Himachal Pradesh.
Several new states also have been carved out in response to tribal demands in the
North-Eastern region of the country from time to time.
Conflict Internal boundaries: Many Indian leaders proclaimed their goals after
Independence to be the establishment of a strong state. Out of the conflict which
developed between the central government leaders, successive demands of leaders of
language movements for reorganization of the internal boundaries of the provinces.