Logic: (The Animal Barks AND It Is A Dog.)
Logic: (The Animal Barks AND It Is A Dog.)
Logic
Propositions
A proposition is a declarative statement that can be evaluated either true or false but cannot be both.
A simple proposition consists of one (1) declarative sentence or statement. A compound proposition
consists of two (2) or more simple propositions joined together by logical operators.
Logical Operators
• combine two (2) or more simple propositions to form a new compound proposition; or
Propositions can be denoted by variables (usually uppercase). Consider two (2) simple propositions
below denoted 𝑃𝑃 and 𝑄𝑄.
• 𝑃𝑃: The animal barks.
• 𝑄𝑄: The animal is a dog.
A. Conjunction: Uses the word “and” to join together two (2) propositions
Symbol: ∧
Example: 𝑃𝑃 ∧ 𝑄𝑄
Read as: 𝑃𝑃 AND 𝑄𝑄
(The animal barks AND it is a dog.)
TRUE: When ALL its components are TRUE
FALSE: When AT LEAST ONE (1) of its components is FALSE
B. Disjunction: Uses the word “or” to join together two (2) propositions
Symbol: ∨
Example: 𝑃𝑃 ∨ 𝑄𝑄
Read as: 𝑃𝑃 OR 𝑄𝑄
(The animal barks or it is a dog.)
TRUE: When AT LEAST ONE (1) of its components is TRUE
FALSE: When ALL of its components are FALSE
C. Implication: Uses “if-then” to construct a new proposition from two (2) propositions
In an implication, the first proposition is called the premise while the second is called the
conclusion.
Symbol: →
Example: 𝑃𝑃 → 𝑄𝑄
Read as: IF 𝑃𝑃, THEN 𝑄𝑄
(IF the animal barks, THEN it is a dog.)
TRUE: When the premise is FALSE, or when the premise and the conclusion are BOTH TRUE
FALSE: When the premise is TRUE but the conclusion is FALSE
D. Biconditional: Uses “if and only if” or “is equivalent to” to construct a new proposition from
two (2) propositions
A biconditional statement simply states that two propositions are equivalent, that is, if the first one
is true, then the second must also true, and if the second is true, then the first must also be true.
Symbol: ↔
Example: 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑄𝑄
Read as: 𝑃𝑃 IF AND ONLY IF 𝑄𝑄
(The animal barks IF AND ONLY IF it is a dog.)
TRUE: When BOTH propositions have the same truth value, that is, when BOTH are TRUE, or
when BOTH are FALSE
FALSE: When the propositions have opposite truth value, that is, one is TRUE but the other is
FALSE
TRUTH TABLES
𝑃𝑃 𝑄𝑄 𝑃𝑃 ∧ 𝑄𝑄 𝑃𝑃 ∨ 𝑄𝑄 𝑃𝑃 → 𝑄𝑄 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑄𝑄 ∼ 𝑃𝑃 ∼ 𝑄𝑄
T T T T T T F F
T F F T F F F T
F T F T T F T F
F F F F T T T T
A tautology is a proposition that is always true under any circumstance. On the other hand, a
contradiction is always false under any circumstance. In determining whether a proposition is a
tautology, a contradiction, or neither, truth tables are used.
Example:
Let 𝑃𝑃 and 𝑄𝑄 be simple propositions. Determine which of these compound propositions are
tautology/ies, contradiction/s, or neither.
a. 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑃𝑃) c. 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)
b. 𝑄𝑄 ∧ (∼ 𝑄𝑄) d. (𝑃𝑃 ∨ 𝑄𝑄) ∧ [(∼ 𝑃𝑃) ∧ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)]
Solutions:
a. 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑃𝑃)
𝑃𝑃 ∼ 𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑃𝑃)
T F T
F T T
Conclusion: It is a tautology.
b. 𝑄𝑄 ∧ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)
𝑄𝑄 ∼ 𝑄𝑄 𝑄𝑄 ∧ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)
T F F
F T F
Conclusion: It is a contradiction.
c. 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)
𝑃𝑃 𝑄𝑄 ∼ 𝑄𝑄 𝑃𝑃 ∨ (∼ 𝑄𝑄)
T T F T
T F T T
F T F F
F F T T
Conclusion: It is a contradiction.
Rules of inference are rules that provide the way of drawing a correct conclusion from a given
premise. With these rules are syllogisms that draw correct conclusion from two (2) or more premises.
Examples:
• If 𝑄𝑄 is the consequence of 𝑃𝑃, and 𝑃𝑃 happens, then 𝑄𝑄 also happens.
• If 𝑄𝑄 is the consequence of 𝑃𝑃, and 𝑄𝑄 did not happen, then 𝑃𝑃 does not happen.
(The last two (2) arguments in which the conclusion absolutely follows from the given premises
is called syllogism.)
A fallacy is a kind of reasoning in which the conclusion does not necessarily or logically follow from
the premise. Hence, it is also known as faulty, invalid, or erroneous reasoning.
Examples:
• In a class of 50 students, 35 receive daily allowance worth above P100. Hence, all 50 students
receive allowance above P100.
(The error of attributing to the whole what is observed to some is known as the fallacy of
composition.)
• If you do anything you want, then you will find joy in life.
(The error of failing to give logical connection between the premise and the conclusion, but
rather the arguments appeal to one’s emotion is known as the fallacy of relevance.)
References:
Chua, R., Ubarro, A., & Wu, Z. (2016). Soaring 21st century mathematics (general mathematics).
Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing House.
Fernando, O. (2016) Next century mathematics (general mathematics). Quezon City: Phoenix
Publishing House.
Lim, Y., Nocon E., Nocon, R., & Ruivivar L. (2016). Math for engaged learning (general
mathematics). Quezon City: Sibs Publishing House.
Melosantos, L. (2016). Math connections in the digital age (general mathematics). Quezon City:
Sibs Publishing House.
Regacho, C., Benjamin, M., & Oryan, S. (2017). Mathematics skills for life. Quezon City: Abiva
Publishing House, Inc.
Zorilla, R. (2016). General mathematics for senior high school. Malabon City: Mutya Publishing
House.