High Mobility Amorphous Zinc Oxynitride Semiconductor Material For Thin Film Transistors
High Mobility Amorphous Zinc Oxynitride Semiconductor Material For Thin Film Transistors
Electronic structure and transport in amorphous metal oxide and amorphous metal oxynitride
semiconductors
Journal of Applied Physics 126, 125702 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096042
2 −1 −1
Amorphous ZnOxNy thin films with high electron Hall mobility exceeding 200 cm V s
Applied Physics Letters 109, 262101 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973203
-1
40
Mobility, cm V s
trend contrasts greatly with that observed for a multicompo-
-1
nent oxide semiconductor, IGZO, where the Hall mobility 30
2
decreases as the carrier concentration decreases.10 TFTs us-
20
ing the high mobility zinc oxynitride as the channel material
have been made to demonstrate the film performance. The 10
stability of the film has also been tested and presented herein.
0
II. EXPERIMENTAL 10
22
-3
b)
Carrier concentration, cm
A reactive sputtering process was used to deposit thin
20
film semiconductor materials on a glass substrate in a modi- 10
fied AKT 4300 dc-magnetron physical vapor deposition
18
chamber. In the chamber, a metallic sputtering target of pure 10
zinc, zinc doped with Al, zinc doped with Sn, and several 500 sccm N2, Zn
others was alternatively used for this study. The purity of the 10
16
300 sccm N2, Zn
sputtering targets was 99.99 or better. The chamber was 500 sccm N2, Zn:Al
equipped with a turbomolecular pump and a gas delivering 14
300 sccm N2, Zn:Al
10
system capable of introducing and accurately metering a va- 0 10 20 30 40 50
riety of reactive gases into the chamber. Software and elec- O2 flow rate, sccm
trical control of the chamber were also modified to allow a
recipe with multiple gases and multiple steps to be run, as is FIG. 1. 共a兲 Hall mobility and 共b兲 carrier concentration of films produced
commonly done in a PECVD process chamber. using different O2 flow rates under a high N2 flow rate at 50 ° C with a zinc
target and a zinc target doped with 1 at. % aluminum. Hall measurement
A heated pedestal for holding a 700⫻ 520⫻ 0.7 mm3 was carried out at room temperature.
Corning 1737 glass substrate was used. The space between
the pedestal and the sputtering target can be settable by
recipe control to be between 60 and 110 mm. The tempera- minimize the involvement of residual oxygen into the pro-
ture of the pedestal can be controlled from 30 to 400 ° C. The cess. Figure 1 shows the electrical properties of as-deposited
pedestal temperature was set at 50 ° C in the tests reported films produced at 50 ° C pedestal temperature. As described
here. The actual substrate temperature could have been in the legend, two different N2 flow rates of 300 and 500
slightly lower or higher than the temperature. SCCM 共SCCM denotes cubic centimeter per minute at STP兲,
The electrical properties of the films such as carrier con- respectively, and two types of sputtering targets, pure zinc
centration and Hall mobility were measured using the van and zinc doped with 1 at. % at aluminum, respectively, were
der Pauw technique with Accent HL 5500PC. This electrical tested for comparison. Other process conditions not men-
measurement was carried out in air at room temperature. tioned, such as target-substrate spacing, dc power, and Ar
Crystallographic structure and possible chemical composi- flow rate, were the same in all processes.
tion of the film were analyzed using an XRD system with All films produced here are n-type semiconductors.
Cu K␣ radiation 共X’pert Pro, PANalytical兲. Both -2 con- Therefore, the Hall mobility and carrier presented here are
figuration and grazing angle configuration were used, espe- the electron mobility and electron carrier, respectively. Fig-
cially for the films having poor crystalline structure. The ure 1共a兲 shows that for all cases, the mobility increases as the
performance of TFTs using the semiconductor film as chan- O2 flow increases up to a point and then decreases as the O2
nel materials was measured at room temperature using an HP flow increases further. The mobility peaks between 10 and 30
semiconductor parameter analyzer 4140B. SCCM of O2 gas depending on whether the target was doped
or undoped, and the highest mobility from the 50 ° C pro-
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION cess, 47 cm2 V−1 s−1, are achieved using a pure zinc target.
Figure 1共b兲 shows that the carrier concentration decreases
A. Film produced from multiple reactions
monotonically as the O2 flow rate increases. The carrier con-
In order to create multiple reactions in a reactive sput- centration in the film deposited from the zinc target doped
tering process of a metallic zinc target, at least two reactive with aluminum is lower than that from the pure zinc target
gases, which are responsible for the growth of hexagonal under the same process conditions. This indicates that the
ZnO and cubic Zn3N2, respectively, were introduced in vari- carrier concentration or conductivity of the film can be ad-
ous ratios into the reactive sputtering chamber. In the tests justed by incorporating a small amount of doping in the zinc
reported in this paper, O2 and N2 were selected as the reac- target.
tive gases. In order to produce films from reactions with The crystalline structures of the films produced from the
oxygen only, or nitrogen only, or both gases, the flow rate of test described in Fig. 1 were analyzed using XRD with the
O2 was adjusted under the same flow rate of N2. Before -2 configuration. The sputtering target used was a pure
running a process that was not to include oxygen, certain zinc target. All films analyzed were at least 2800 Å or
measures, such as attaining a low base pressure and remov- thicker, as noted in the figure caption, to ensure sufficient
ing the oxidation layer from the metallic target, were taken to growth of any crystalline structures and sufficient detection
074512-3 Ye, Lim, and White J. Appl. Phys. 106, 074512 共2009兲
1000 1600
a) 0 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2 a) 0 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2
321
400
800
1200
Zn3N2(cubic) Zn3N2(cubic)
Intensity
Intensity
440
332
600
321
400
800
440
332
400
721
400
721
222
200
444
521
631
222
611
444
521
631
611
0 0
400 400
b) 20 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2 b) 20 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2
350
300
Intensity
Intensity
300
200
250
200 100
150 0
1600 1600
c) 50 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2 c) 50 sccm O2, 500 sccm N2
1200 1200
101
101
Intensity
Intensity
ZnO (hex) ZnO (hex)
800 800
100
100
002
002
110
110
103
103
102
112
102
112
400 400
0 0
30 40 50 60 70 30 40 50 60 70
Diffraction angle 2 Diffraction angle 2
FIG. 2. Diffraction spectra from XRD measurement with a -2 configura- FIG. 3. Diffraction spectra from XRD measurement with a 0.5° glazing
tion for as-deposited films deposited at 50 ° C using an undoped zinc target angle configuration for as-deposited films using an undoped zinc target de-
deposited 共a兲 at 0 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共280 nm thickness兲, 共b兲 at posited at 50 ° C 共a兲 at 0 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共280 nm thickness兲,
20 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共280 nm thickness兲, and 共c兲 at 50 SCCM 共b兲 at 20 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共280 nm thickness兲, and 共c兲 at 50
O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共330 nm thickness兲. Stick patterns of a cubic Zn3N2 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2 共330 nm thickness兲. Stick patterns of a cubic
共Ref. 22兲 and a hexagonal ZnO 共Ref. 23兲 are plotted in 共a兲 and 共c兲 for Zn3N2 共Ref. 22兲 and a hexagonal ZnO 共Ref. 23兲 are plotted in 共a兲 and 共c兲 for
comparison. comparison.
signals. Figure 2共a兲 shows the spectrum of the film from a identification of the films with better detecting sensitivity.
process using 0 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM N2. A stick pat- The results of the measurement, summarized in Fig. 3共a兲,
tern of a cubic Zn3N2 powder22 is plotted in the figure for confirm that the diffraction spectrum of the film from the 0
comparison. All peaks of the diffraction spectrum of the film SCCM O2 process fits reasonably well with the Zn3N2 pat-
correspond well to the Zn3N2 pattern, which indicates that tern at both small and large 2 angles, again supporting the
the film produced has the same cubic crystalline structure as observation that the film produced has the same crystalline
the reference Zn3N2. Figure 2共c兲 presents the spectrum of the structure and the same stoichiometric composition as the cu-
film from the process using 50 SCCM O2 and 500 SCCM bic Zn3N2 reference. Figure 3共c兲 reveals that the diffraction
N2. A stick pattern of a hexagonal ZnO 共Ref. 23兲 is also spectrum of the film from the 50 SCCM O2 process corre-
plotted on the same chart for comparison. Here, a strong sponds to the ZnO stick pattern, although the peaks shift
sharp peak around a diffraction angle 2 of 35.4° is observed slightly to a smaller diffraction angle at large 2 angles. This
over other small peaks. This suggests that the film has the indicates that the interplanar separation of the diffraction
hexagonal crystalline structure as the crystalline ZnO with a planes, therefore the composition of the film, differs slightly
preferred 共002兲 orientation. Figure 2共b兲 shows the diffraction from that of the ZnO reference. Such a departure from the
spectrum of the film produced using 20 SCCM O2 and 500 stoichiometric composition indicates the presence of nitro-
SCCM N2 which gives a Hall mobility of above gen in the lattice of ZnO. Figure 3共b兲 exhibits more clearly
45 cm2 V−1 s−1. All distinct peaks presented in Figs. 2共a兲 the amorphous scattering and confirms the amorphous phase
and 2共c兲 disappear, and the amorphous scattering appears of the film produced from the process with the 20 SCCM O2.
although the detecting signal is weak. A tiny peak around 2 The actual composition of the film is not identified here al-
of 31°, not observed from the other two films, suggests that a though it is certainly different from the other two crystalline
small fraction of the crystalline phase may also exist in the films presented.
amorphous film. From these test results, it is evident that very different
Additional XRD measurement with the 0.5° glancing types of thin films can be produced by adjusting the oxygen
angle configuration 共0.5° ⍀-offset兲 was performed for further availability in a reactive environment that has a much higher
074512-4 Ye, Lim, and White J. Appl. Phys. 106, 074512 共2009兲
-1
40
Mobility, cm V s
the residual oxygen in the chamber, the growth of the film is
-1
only a result of a reaction between zinc and nitrogen, pro- 30
2
ducing a Zn3N2 film that has the stoichiometric composition
as the reference. When the oxygen flow is set higher than a 20
-3
lattices, which is similar to crystalline ZnO:N 共Refs. 16–21兲 b)
Carrier concentration, cm
21
10
or crystalline ZnON.15 When the oxygen flow rate is adjusted
to an intermediate level, both nitrogen and oxygen strongly 20
10
influence the growth of the film, resulting in complicated
changes in phase, structure, and chemical composition. The 10
19
60
a)
-1
Hall mobility, cm V s
40
-1
Amorphous
2
20
IGZO films
10
0
-3
Carrier concentration, cm
21
10
20
10
b)
19
10 Single-crystalline
IGZO films
18
10 1
16 17 18 19 20 21
10 10 10 10 10 10
17 -3
10 Carrier concentration, cm
0 100 200 300 400 500
N2 flow rate, sccm FIG. 6. Relationship between Hall mobility and carrier concentration for
both the ZnON as deposited at 50 ° C and a multicomponent metal oxide,
FIG. 5. 共a兲 Hall mobility and 共b兲 carrier concentration before and after IGZO. ZnON data are converted from Figs. 4 and 5. The solid line is the
annealing at 400 ° C for 30 min. Films were deposited at 50 ° C using a zinc fitting curve for amorphous IGZO films and the dashed line is for single
target and a zinc target doped with 1 at. % aluminum. Hall measurement crystalline IGZO films 共Ref. 10兲. Hall measurement was carried out at room
was carried out at room temperature. temperature.
110 cm2 / V s for the ZnON film and to about 90 cm2 / V s IGZO films from Nomura et al.10 have also been plotted for
for the aluminum-doped zinc oxynitride 共ZnON:Al兲 film comparison. The mobility of both single crystalline and
without significant change in the carrier concentration in amorphous IGZO films increases as the carrier concentration
general. decreases. It is most likely that the carrier transports in the
It should also be noted that under the conditions de- ZnON and the IGZO films are dominated by different
scribed, all films produced, whether annealed or not, are mechanisms.
n-type semiconductors. This result may seem contrary to the The relationship of mobility and carrier concentration in
popular practice of making a p-type ZnO TCO through ni- the ZnON films can be characterized by the dominance of an
trogen doping. Actually, nitrogen can be incorporated with impurity scattering in carrier transport. The main difference
zinc and oxygen in different states, creating either electron is that the same carrier transport behavior takes place in a
donors or acceptors.24 Although intense efforts have been different range of carrier concentration. For degenerate con-
made to produce ZnO:N for p-type TCO, only limited suc- ducting ZnO films produced under many different condi-
cess has been achieved so far. It appears that for ZnO:N tions, a peak mobility is attained at a carrier concentration of
films, donors are more easily produced than acceptors, and around 1 ⫻ 1020 cm−3, and the carrier concentration that the
the n-type conduction is more stable than the p-type conduc- transport of carriers is dominated by impurity scattering
tion. This is consistent with what was observed here. ranged above that.1 For the ZnON films as deposited at
50 ° C, the carrier concentration for the peak mobility and
C. Carrier transport
the regime dominated by the impurity scattering is shifted
The high mobility amorphous or highly disordered nano- down at least two orders of magnitude. Such a shift suggests
crystalline ZnON films produced here share some similarity that the deviation of the films from the degenerate conduct-
in carrier transport mechanism with multicomponent oxide ing ZnO films may have resulted from lowering the Fermi
semiconductors such as IGZO. Both are composed of post- level farther away from the conduction band bottom associ-
transition metals and have possibly a direct overlap of spa- ated with the decrease in electron carrier concentration.
tially spread ns orbitals of neighboring metal cations. As a The contrary relationship between mobility and carrier
result, a highly ordered crystalline structure is not required to concentration from IGZO films has the characteristics that a
achieve high mobility, as was discussed previously. lattice or a grain boundary scattering dominates the carrier
Figure 6 represents the data of as-deposited films from transport. However, it is unusual that this type of behavior is
the 50 ° C process, shown in Figs. 4 and 5, as the change in extended to such high carrier concentration even for the
mobility with respect to the carrier concentration as the flow single crystalline IGZO. To explain this behavior, a model
rate of N2 changes. The mobility of both doped and undoped describing an insulator-metal transition due to the distribu-
ZnON films increases as the carrier concentration decreases tion of potential barriers formed around the conduction band
until it reaches a peak or saturation point. Fitting curves of bottom has been proposed for the single crystalline IGZO.25
the change in Hall mobility with carrier concentration for It was reported that the Hall mobility of the single crystalline
074512-6 Ye, Lim, and White J. Appl. Phys. 106, 074512 共2009兲
-1
40
Mobility, cm V s
dicating that the degenerate conduction was achieved. Since
-1
it has also behaviors different from a degenerate semicon- 30
2
ductor, it was proposed that the potential barriers originated
20
from the random distribution of Ga3+ and Zn2+ ions in the
crystalline structure govern the transition to the degenerate 10
conduction.25 The potential barriers were overcome as the
carrier concentration increased along with the increase in the 0
Hall mobility. It is believed that the similar mechanism is 10
22
-3
b)
Carrier concentration, cm
applicable to the amorphous IGZO since a similar behavior
has been observed.10,25 10
20
60
be possible, through further optimization of all process steps
as-deposited making the TFT, to achieve a better overall TFT performance
40 in the future.
20
10
22 IV. SUMMARY
-3
b)
Carrier concentration, cm
as-deposited
ZnO:N or ZnON films with distinct hexagonal ZnO crys-
20
10 talline structure are often achieved even though nitrogen is
present in the film, as shown in previous literatures. It is
18
10 observed that the reaction of zinc with nitrogen is much
weaker than that with oxygen, and therefore the growth of
16
10 the film is easily dominated by the reaction with oxygen. By
Annealed at 400 C for 30min
as-deposited
carefully adjusting the ratio of oxygen to nitrogen containing
10
14
reactants, the competition between reactions for growth of
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 cubic Zn3N2 and for growth of hexagonal ZnO is promoted
Days in room air without passivation in a reactive sputtering process. Since multiple reactions re-
sponsible for different crystalline structures influence the
FIG. 8. 共a兲 Hall mobility and 共b兲 carrier concentration for a film produced
using a zinc target doped with 1 at. % aluminum deposited at 50 ° C and growth of the film, an amorphous or a highly disordered
annealed at 400 ° C after exposure to room air without passivation or nanocrystalline ZnON or ZnO:N film can be obtained. The
encapsulation. film produced through the multireaction process at 50 ° C
exhibited a higher Hall mobility than the films with predomi-
zinc oxynitride film as a channel layer. Figure 9 shows trans- nantly either cubic Zn3N2 or hexagonal ZnO crystalline
fer characteristics of a TFT with the channel width and structure. This indicates that a highly ordered crystalline
length of 40 and 10 µm, respectively. The channel layer was structure is not required to achieve a high mobility of the
deposited through a reactive sputtering process as previously film, and that the model proposed by Hosono et al. for high
described, using a zinc target doped with 2.8 at. % Al at mobility amorphous metal oxides still applies to the com-
50 ° C and annealed at 350 ° C. Cr was used for both gate pounds incorporated with nitrogen, such as metal oxynitrides
metal and source-drain contact metal. A 3300 Å thick Si3N4 and possibly even metal nitrides. In addition, the higher mo-
gate dielectric layer and a 2000 Å SiO2 / Si3N4 passivation bility achieved from the multireaction process suggests that
layer were used in the TFT and were deposited by PECVD at the carrier transport in the film may be improved additionally
a pedestal temperature of 200 ° C. On current, off current, through the involvement of both oxygen and nitrogen.
threshold voltage, and subthreshold swing achieved were Furthermore, it was observed that the relationship be-
about 2 ⫻ 10−4 A, 5 ⫻ 10−13 A, 0.5 V, and 0.8 V/decade, re- tween Hall mobility and carrier concentration in the high
spectively. The saturation mobility was about mobility ZnON is different from that of a multicomponent
10 cm2 V−1 s−1. It is suspected that the small peaks in the metal oxide such as IGZO. The Hall mobility of the ZnON
gate voltage measured between ⫺15 and ⫺5 V are artifact film has been shown to increase as the carrier concentration
decreases in a relatively low carrier concentration range. The
-3
Hall mobility of IGZO follows the opposite trend. The dif-
10
ference is likely due to differences in how conduction band
potentials are modulated in the single and the multimetal
10
-5
compound. For the high mobility ZnON film, no random
insertion of chemically distinct cations occurs. Therefore, no
Drain current, A
-7
additional disturbance or modulation upon the electronic
10
structure around the conduction band bottom could take
place, and thus, no additional potential barriers should be
10
-9
created. As a result, higher carrier concentration is not re-
quired to overcome the extra potential barriers for higher
-11
mobility as is the case for a multicomponent metal oxide.
10 Vds=0.1V
Vds=1V
Instead, the improvement of carrier transport in the ZnON
Vds=10V film most likely relies on the reduction in defects in the film,
10
-13
as indicated by increased mobility coincident with lower car-
-20 -10 0 10 20 30
rier concentration.
Gate voltage, V
The shelf life of the ZnON film has been investigated.
FIG. 9. Transfer characteristics of a TFT using the ZnON doped with 2.8% Over time, the adsorption of moisture and pollutants on an
Al as the channel material. as-deposited film deposited at low temperature may result in
074512-8 Ye, Lim, and White J. Appl. Phys. 106, 074512 共2009兲
9
the deterioration of the film. Annealing of the film signifi- H. Hosono, N. Kikuchi, N. Ueda, and H. Kawazoe, J. Non-Cryst. Solids
198–200, 165 共1996兲.
cantly increased the resistance of the film to the deterioration 10
K. Nomura, H. Ohta, A. Takagl, T. Kamiya, M. Hirani, and H. Hosono,
from several weeks to more than 660 days even without any Nature 共London兲 432, 488 共2004兲.
encapsulation or passivation. A TFT has been made using the 11
J. Lee, D. Kim, D. Yang, S. Hong, K. Yoon, P. Hong, C. Jeong, H. Park,
ZnON as the channel layer. The field effect mobility of the S. Kim, S. Y. Kim, S. K. Lim, and S. S. Kim, SID 08 Digest, 2008, pp.
fabricated TFT was lowered in order to achieve the desired 626–628.
12
K. Son, T. Kim, J. Jung, M. Ryu, K. Park, B. Yoo, J. Kim, Y. Lee, J.
threshold voltage, off current, subthreshold swing, and many Kwon, S. Lee, and J. Kim, SID 08 Digest, 2008, pp. 433–636.
other performance specifications. Optimization of all inte- 13
H. Q. Chiang and J. F. Wager, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 013503 共2005兲.
14
grated process steps is required to achieve higher field effect W. B. Jackson, R. L. Hoffman, and G. S. Herman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87,
mobility, as indicated by the Hall mobility as well as better 193503 共2005兲.
15
M. Futsuhara, K. Yoshioka, and O. Takai, Thin Solid Films 317, 322
overall TFT performance in the future. 共1998兲.
16
J. M. Bian, X. M. Li, X. D. Gao, W. D. Yu, and L. D. Chen, Appl. Phys.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lett. 84, 541 共2004兲.
17
J. G. Ma, Y. C. Lui, R. Mu, J. Y. Zhang, Y. M. Lu, D. Z. Shen, and X. W.
This work was performed with additional funding from Fan, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22, 94 共2004兲.
18
the Applied Materials CTO office. The authors would like to E. Kaminska, A. Poitrowska, J. Kossut, A. Barcz, R. Butkute, W. Dobro-
thank Dr. David Eaglesham, Dr. Omkaram Nalamasu, and wolski, E. Dynowska, R. Jakiela, E. Przezdziecka, R. Lukasiewicz, M.
Aleszkiewicz, P. Wojnar, and E. Kowalczyk, Solid State Commun. 135, 11
Dr. Mark Pinto for providing encouragement and support for 共2005兲.
the initiation of the project as well as helpful discussions. 19
M. L. Tu, Y. K. Su, and C. Y. Ma, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 053705 共2006兲.
20
B. Yao, D. Z. Shen, Z. Z. Zhang, X. H. Wang, Z. P. Wei, B. H. Li, Y. M.
1
T. Minami, MRS Bull. 25, 33 共2000兲. Lv, X. W. Fan, L. X. Guan, G. Z. Xing, C. X. Cong, and Y. P. Xie, J. Appl.
2
Y. Ohya, T. Niwa, T. Ban, and Y. Takahashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 40, Phys. 99, 123510 共2006兲.
21
297 共2001兲. D. Klaitabtim, S. Pratontep, and J. Nukeaw, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 47,
3
R. L. Hoffman, B. J. Norris, and J. F. Wager, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 733 653 共2008兲.
22
共2003兲. JCPDS Card No. 35-0762.
4 23
P. F. Carcia, R. S. Mclean, M. H. Reilly, and G. Nunes, Jr., Appl. Phys. JCPDS Card No. 36-1451.
24
Lett. 82, 1117 共2003兲. Y. F. Yan, S. B. Zhang, and S. T. Pantelides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5723
5
E. Fortunato, A. Pimentel, L. Pereira, A. Goncalves, G. Lavareda, H. 共2001兲.
25
Aguas, I. Ferreira, C. N. Caralho, and R. Martins, J. Non-Cryst. Solids K. Nomura, T. Kamiya, H. Ohta, K. Ueda, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono,
338–340, 806 共2004兲. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1993 共2004兲.
6 26
T. Hirao, M. Furuta, H. Furuta, T. Matsuda, T. Hiramatsu, H. Hokari, and F. Zong, H. Ma, C. Xue, H. Zhuang, X. Zhang, H. Xiao, J. Ma, and F. Ji,
M. Yoshida, SID 06 Digest, 2006, pp. 18–20. Solid State Commun. 132, 521 共2004兲.
7 27
T. Hirao, M. Furuta, T. Hiramatsu, T. Matsuda, C. Li, H. Furuta, H. M. Futsuhara, K. Yoshioka, and O. Takai, Thin Solid Films 322, 274
Hokari, M. Yoshida, H. Ishii, and M. Kakegawa, IEEE Trans. Electron 共1998兲.
28
Devices 55, 3136 共2008兲. K. Toyoura, H. Tsujimura, T. Goto, K. Hachiya, R. Hagiwara, and Y. Ito,
8
F. Hossain, J. Nishii, S. Takagi, A. Ohtomo, T. Fukumura, H. Fujioka, H. Thin Solid Films 492, 88 共2005兲.
29
Koinuma, and M. Kawasaki, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7768 共2003兲. EAG’s report of XPS/ESCA analysis to AKT 共2007兲.