Topic 1: Basic Steps in The Research Process: Step 1: Identify and Develop Your Topic
Topic 1: Basic Steps in The Research Process: Step 1: Identify and Develop Your Topic
1) The term ‘research’ refers to the repetition of the search (examination). Repetitive
research in various directions to prove the central question of the thesis is generally
called ‘research’.
- 1 -
How many pages/words do you need to write? How long is your presentation?
Do you need to include specific types of sources (e.g. scholarly journal, book,
etc.)?
When is the assignment due? How much time do you have to research?
Is currency of information important?
When in doubt, consult with your instructor.
Topic or your
Obesity in the American population
research problem
Background research:
- 2 -
Provides a good overview of the topic if you are unfamiliar with it.
Helps identify important facts: terminology, dates, events, history, organizations,
etc.
Can help refine your topic.
Leads to bibliographies which provide additional sources of information.
- 3 -
If you are finding too little information, your topic may be too NARROW,
specialized, or current. Use these strategies to broaden your topic.
Generalize your topic. If your topic is the economic effects of fracking on
Generalize
Troy, PA, broaden your topic to all Pennsylvania communities or US.
If your topic is very current, there may not be books or journal articles
Currency
available yet. Choose an alternative topic that is not so recent.
Related Explore related issues.
Expand/ Expand or remove: location, time period, aspect, event, population,
Remove person/group.
Example of a Narrow Topic: Does cartoon viewing cause aggression in children
under age five?
Broader: What are the negative effects of TV on children and adolescents?
- 4 -
☐ Step 5: Evaluate your sources
Evaluate the authority and quality of the information you have located. You shall
provide credible, truthful, and reliable information and you have every right to
expect that the sources you use are providing the same. This step is especially
important when using Internet resources. "Since it's on the Internet, it must be
true!" Seriously? That's not necessarily the case.
Source Types
When evaluating information, it is useful to identify if it's a Primary, Secondary,
or Tertiary source. By doing so, you will be able recognize if the author is
reporting on his/her own first hand experiences, or relying on the views of others.
- 5 -
Source Type Examples
Primary First-person account of an event; First
A first-person account by someone who publication of a scientific study;
experienced or witnessed an event. The Speech or lecture; Original artwork;
original document has not been Handwritten manuscript; Letters
previously published or interpreted by between two people; A diary; Historical
anyone else. documents, e.g. Bill of Rights
Secondary
One step removed from the primary Newspaper reporting on a scientific
original source. The author is study
reexamining, interpreting and forming Review of a music CD or art show
conclusions based on the information Biography
conveyed in the primary source.
Tertiary
Further removed from a primary source. Bibliography
It leads the researcher to a secondary Index to articles
source, rather than to the primary Library catalog
source.
- 6 -
type of writing in which you are engaged. For example, literature reviews in
science reports rely almost exclusively on summary. Argumentative essays, by
contrast, rely on all three tools.
Paraphrase and summary are indispensable in argumentative papers because they
allow you to include other people’s ideas without cluttering up your paragraphs
with quotations. These techniques help you take greater control of your essay.
Consider using either tool when an idea from one of your sources is important to
your essay but the wording is not. Space limitations may guide you in your
choice. But above all, think about how much of the detail from your source is
relevant to your argument. If your reader needs to know only the bare bones,
then summarize.
Though paraphrase and summary are often preferable to quotation, do not rely
too heavily on them, either. Your ideas are what matter most. Allow yourself the
space to develop those ideas.
How do I summarize?
Summary moves much further than paraphrase from point-by-point translation.
When you summarize a passage, you need first to absorb the meaning and then to
capture in your own words the most important elements from the original passage.
A summary is necessarily shorter than a paraphrase.
How do I paraphrase?
Whenever you paraphrase, remember these two points: (1) You must provide a
reference. (2) The paraphrase must be in your own words. You must do more
than merely substitute phrases here and there. You must also create your own
sentence structures.
Finding new words for ideas that are already well expressed can be hard, but
changing words should not be your chief aim anyway. Focus, rather, on filtering
the ideas through your own understanding. The following strategy will make the
job of paraphrasing a lot easier: (1) When you are at the note-taking stage, and
you come across a passage that may be useful for your essay, do not copy the
passage verbatim unless you think you will want to quote it. (2) If you think you
will want to paraphrase the passage, make a note only of the author’s basic point
(or points). You don’t even need to use full sentences. (3) In your note, you
should already be translating the language of the original into your own words.
What matters is that you capture the original idea. (4) Make sure to jot down the
source as well as the page number so that you can make a proper reference later
on.
When it comes time to write the paper, rely on your notes rather than on the
author’s work. You will find it much easier to avoid borrowing from the original
passage because you will not have seen it recently. Follow this simple sequence:
- 7 -
(1) Convert the ideas from your notes into full sentences. (2) Provide a reference.
(3) Go back to the original to ensure that (a) your paraphrase is accurate and (b)
you have truly said things in your own words.
- 8 -
Step 7-1 Outline the Paper
Why Outline?
- Outlines provide a means of organizing your information in an hierarchical or
logical order.
- For research papers, a formal outline can help you keep track of large amounts
of information.
- 9 -
4. Note the source and page number of the quotation in a launch statement or in
parentheses.
EXAMPLE : According to Lennie, "[...] I got you to look after me, and you got me
to look after you, and that's why" (Steinbeck 14).
EXAMPLE
Original Text: If the existence of a signing ape was unsettling for linguists, it
was also startling news for animal behaviorists (Davis 26).
Unacceptable Borrowing of Phrases: Davis observed that the existence of a
signing ape unsettled linguists and startled animal behaviorists (26).
Unacceptable Borrowing of Structure: Davis observed that if the presence of a
sign-language-using chimp was disturbing for scientists studying language, it
was also surprising to scientists studying animal behavior (26).
Acceptable Paraphrase: Davis observed both linguists and animal behaviorists
were taken by surprise upon learning of an ape’s ability to use sign language
(26).
- 10 -
☐ Step 9: Cite your sources properly
Give credit where credit is due; cite your sources.
Citing or documenting the sources used in your research serves two purposes: it
gives proper credit to the authors of the materials used, and it allows those who
are reading your work to duplicate your research and locate the sources that you
have listed as references. The MLA and the APA Styles are two popular citation
formats.
☐ Step 10 Proofread
The final step in the process is to proofread the paper you have created. Read
through the text and check for any errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Make sure the sources you used are cited properly. Make sure the message that
you want to get across to the reader has been thoroughly stated.
Borrowed from :
1. Basic Steps in the Research Process by North Hennepin Community College
https://www.nhcc.edu/academics/library/doing-library-research/basic-steps-research-process
- 11 -
Topic 2: Organization and Structure in Scientific Writings2)
There is no single organizational pattern that works well for all writing across all
disciplines; rather, organization depends on what you’re writing, who you’re writing
it for, and where your writing will be read. In order to communicate your ideas,
you’ll need to use a logical and consistent organizational structure in all of your
writing. We can think about organization at the global level (your entire paper or
project) as well as at the local level (a chapter, section, or paragraph). For an
American academic situation, this means that at all times, the goal of revising for
organization and structure is to consciously design your writing projects to make
them easy for readers to understand. In this context, you as the writer are always
responsible for the reader's ability to understand your work; in other words,
American academic writing is writer-responsible. A good goal is to make your
writing accessible and comprehensible to someone who just reads sections of your
writing rather than the entire piece. This handout provides strategies for revising
your writing to help meet this goal.
Note that this resource focuses on writing for an American academic setting,
specifically for graduate students. American academic writing is of course not the
only standard for academic writing, and researchers around the globe will have
different expectations for organization and structure. The OWL has some more
resources about writing for American and international audiences here.
While organization varies across and within disciplines, usually based on the genre,
publication venue, and other rhetorical considerations of the writing, a great deal
of academic writing can be described by the acronym IMRAD (or IMRaD):
Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
This structure is common across most of the sciences and is often used in the
humanities for empirical research. This structure doesn't serve every purpose (for
instance, it may be difficult to follow IMRAD in a proposal for a future study or in
more exploratory writing in the humanities), and it is often tweaked or changed to
fit a particular situation. Still, its wide use as a base for a great deal of scholarly
writing makes it worthwhile to break down here.
Introduction: What is the purpose of the study? What were the research
2) owl.purdue.edu/owl/graduate_writing/graduate_writing_topics
- 12 -
questions? What necessary background information should the reader
understand to help contextualize the study? (Some disciplines include their
literature review section as part of the introduction; some give the literature
review its own heading on the same level as the other sections, i.e., ILMRAD.)
Some writers use the CARS(Creating a Research Space) model to help craft
their introductions more effectively.
Methods: What methods did the researchers use? How was the study
conducted? If the study included participants, who were they, and how were
they selected?
Results: This section lists the data. What did the researchers find as a result of
their experiments (or, if the research is not experimental, what did the
researchers learn from the study)? How were the research questions answered?
Discussion: This section places the data within the larger conversation of the
field. What might the results mean? Do these results agree or disagree with
other literature cited? What should researchers do in the future?
Depending on your discipline, this may be exactly the structure you should use in
your writing; or, it may be a base that you can see under the surface of published
pieces in your field, which then diverge from the IMRAD structure to meet the
expectations of other scholars in the field. However, you should always check to
see what's expected of you in a given situation; this might mean talking to the
professor for your class, looking at a journal's submission guidelines, reading your
field's style manual, examining published examples, or asking a trusted mentor.
Every field is a little different.
- 13 -
complex? According to categories? Another order?
Reverse outlining comes at the drafting or revision stage of the writing process.
After you have a complete draft of your project (or a section of your project),
work alone or with a partner to read your project with the goal of understanding
the main points you have made and the relationship of these points to one
another. The OWL has another resource about reverse outlining here.
The style of signpost you use will depend on the genre of your paper, the
discipline in which you are writing, and your or your readers’ personal
preferences. Regardless of the style of signpost you select, it’s important to include
signposts regularly. They occur most frequently at the beginnings and endings of
sections of your paper. It is often helpful to include signposts at mid-points in
your project in order to remind readers of where you are in your argument.
- 14 -
How does the author use transitional words and phrases to guide readers through
ideas (e.g. however, in addition, similarly, nevertheless, another, while, because,
first, second, next, then etc.)?
WORKS CONSULTED
Clark, I. (2006). Writing the successful thesis and dissertation: Entering the
conversation. Prentice Hall Press.
Davis, M., Davis, K. J., & Dunagan, M. (2012). Scientific papers and presentations.
Academic press.
- 15 -
Topic 3: Organization & the CARS(Creating a Research Space) Model3)
Although each discipline has its own conventions for what articles, research
reports, dissertations, and other types of scholarly writing should look like,
academic writing shares some general characteristics across each field. One area
of similarity is the introduction section. This handout provides strategies for
revising introductions.
3) owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/the_writing_process/organization_CARS_Model.html
- 16 -
Step writing action
Step 1 Claiming describing the research problem and providing evidence to support
importance why the topic is important to study
Step 2 Making topic providing statements about the current state of knowledge,
generalizations consensus, practice or description of phenomena
synthesize prior research that further supports the need to study
Step 3 Reviewing
the research problem; this is not a literature review but more a
items of previous
reflection of key studies that have touched upon but perhaps not
research
fully addressed the topic
- 17 -
paper.
Step 1a answering the “So What?” question. Explain in clear language the
Outlining purposes objectives of your study
Step 1b describe the purpose of your study in terms of what the research is
Announcing going to do or accomplish. In the social sciences, the “So What?”
present research question still needs to addressed
Step 2 present a brief, general summary of key findings written, such as,
Announcing “The findings indicate a need for...,” or “The research suggests four
principle findings approaches to....”
Step 3 Indicating
state how the remainder of your paper is organized
article structure
Writers can use these moves as a guide for revising their own writing, or for
helping others.
Topic Outline
A topic outline is a fast and easy way to analyze whether an introduction is
effectively organized. According to Pyrczak and Bruce, a topic outline can help
show the flow of an introduction to ensure it moves from a general introduction of
the problem or gap to a specific discussion of the current research (33). The topic
outline can be combined with the CARS model to improve your introduction or to
offer advice to a peer.
- 18 -
TOPIC OUTLINE EXERCISE
1) With your own paper, or a peer’s, read through the introduction section.
2) As you read, write down the main points in the introduction in outline form,
using short phrases or sentences to describe what you see happening. The
outline need not be complex.
3) After creating your outline, read through it to see if each of the moves in the
CARS model is covered. Pay particular attention to whether the paper’s author:
a) Mentions how the paper fits into previous research,
b) Lists the paper’s main findings, and
c) Outlines the structure of the paper.
Works Cited
Pyrczak, Fred and Randall R. Bruce. Writing Empirical Research Reports: A Basic
Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Los Angeles: Pyrczak
Publishing, 2000. Print.
Swales, John. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. 1990.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.
- 19 -
previous studies and the research you are presenting that is intended to help
resolve these deficiencies. Below is a table of common words used by authors.
Contrast Quantity Verbs Adjectives
challenge, deter,
difficult, dubious, elusive,
albeit, although disregard, exclude,
inadequate, incomplete,
but, howbeit, fail, hinder, ignore,
inconclusive, ineffective,
however, few, handful lack, limit,
inefficient, questionable,
nevertheless, less, little, no misinterpret,
scarce, uncertain,
notwithstanding, none, not neglect
unclear, unconvincing,
unfortunately, obviate, omit,
unproductive, unreliable,
whereas, yet overlook, prevent,
unsatisfactory
question, restrict
NOTE: You may prefer not to adopt a negative stance in your writing when
placing it within the context of prior research. In such cases, an alternative
approach is to utilize a neutral, contrastive statement that expresses a new
perspective without giving the appearance of trying to diminish the validity of
other people's research.
- 20 -
Topic 4: MECE principle
MECE: How to Think, Write & Persuade Like a McKinsey Consultant
June 29, 2020 by Ryan Law in Writing4)
Mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive (MECE) is one of the core
problem-solving frameworks in management consulting. It can also be a powerful
method for better writing.
Consulting firms like Bain, McKinsey, and BCG use case interviews as a core part
of their selection process for new consultants. In a case interview, candidates are
asked to solve an intentionally broad challenge, like how to equitably distribute
funds to an Ebola-stricken country or how to assess the viability of opening a new
coffee shop.
The MECE framework—invented by legendary McKinsey consultant Barbara Minto—
allows candidates to tackle these open-ended challenges in a logical and thorough
way. It guarantees a baseline of clarity when faced with even the most unexpected
challenges. It ensures no obvious gaps in their logic and no glaring oversights.
When applied to content marketing, MECE can supercharge your writing. It allows
you to create persuasive, comprehensive content on virtually any topic. It gets
your thinking off the page and ensures that your articles deliver on their
promises.
4) www.animalz.co/blog/mece-mutually-exclusive-collectively-exhaustive/
- 21 -
Pretty simple: If you write a recipe for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich that
leaves out the jelly, your recipe isn’t collectively exhaustive. Similarly, if you write
an article promising “4 Strategies for Better Mobile App Retention” that offers only
three strategies, your article isn’t collectively exhaustive.
Also simple: If step 2 of your recipe is “slather peanut butter and jelly on both
pieces of bread,” and step 3 is “now add the jelly,” your recipe isn’t mutually
exclusive. If two of the strategies in your article are both about using tooltips for
better onboarding, your article isn’t mutually exclusive.
- 22 -
In writing, we can apply the same process to article outlines. Most article ideas
come from a problem we want to solve or an opinion we want to voice. The first
step is to break down the topic into its component parts, and ask, “What
information is necessary to answer the article’s core question?”
You can see how the writer’s own research and reasoning have dictated the
structure of the piece: they opened up Google and asked, “Well, why would I need
a content pipeline in the first place?” and then wrote about that. At first glance,
this structure seems reasonable, but it completely fails at being MECE.
It’s not collectively exhaustive because it doesn’t capture the full range of data
necessary to help you build a content marketing pipeline—two out of three sections
don’t even touch on the topic. It’s not mutually exclusive because the third section
—“How to build a better content marketing pipeline”—is the same as the title of
the post.
- 23 -
If we wrote this article, we’d end up with 2,000 words of copy that largely skirted
around the topic at hand: how to build a content marketing pipeline. The
context-setting sections would be too long, and the meaty “how to” portion would
be too short.
Instead of structuring the article around your own internal monologue, a better
approach is to outline it with a process structure in mind. We’re teaching the
reader to do something, so the article should share the constituent steps of a
process. It should have a start, a middle, and an end. Each point should follow on
from the conclusion of the previous.
Viewed through this lens, it becomes easier to create a MECE structure for How to
Build a Content Marketing Pipeline. A prerequisite to writing lots of content is
planning lots of content. Next, we can focus on the minutiae of writing those
ideas. Lastly, we’d want to know how our content performed, in order to feed back
into planning the next round of content:
In this example, we cover everything that happens before you start writing
content, everything that happens during its actual creation, and everything
required to learn from what you publish.
- 24 -
There’s no overlap between sections; each addresses a different stage of the
process, and they add up to something that feels like a comprehensive take on the
subject.
The process of breaking down a topic into its component parts could be repeated
infinitely, and the pursuit of collective exhaustiveness could easily lead to articles
tens of thousands of words long. But the longer an article becomes, the easier it
is to end up rehashing the same information (hence, not mutually exclusive).
Even more common are articles that attempt to tackle huge, meaty topics without
affording them the word count required to be collectively exhaustive. Great MECE
content is only as long as it needs to be:
Why the Best Content Happens Fast doesn’t need to be long. It’s a single thought,
- 25 -
and the article can be collectively exhaustive within the scope of 600 words.
BLUF: The Military Standard That Can Make Your Writing More Powerful is more
complex. We need to define the concept, highlight its application within writing,
and use examples to demonstrate the principle in action. To write a MECE article,
we needed 1,700 words.
Napkin math at the outline stage can be useful for scoping the required length of
the article. How to Build a Better Content Marketing Pipeline contains three
sections. Each is roughly as important as the others, so we want to allocate an
even word count to each.
With a guesstimate of 500 words per section, and a short introduction and
conclusion, we’re likely to need 1,500-2,000- words to make the topic MECE:
Estimating length like this helps ensure that a finished article delivers on the
MECE structure we intend for it. We can identify the core topics, estimate the
relative importance of each, and ensure that we allocate enough time and energy
to making each section distinct and comprehensive.
- 26 -
Topic 5: How to Write an Entertaining YouTube Video Script
Lydia Sweatt in Tips & Tricks October 25 2022
https://vidiq.com/blog/post/write-youtube-video-script/
Want to write video scripts for YouTube? Here's how to format the document and
create better stories for your audience.
You know the importance of having a video script if you're a YouTuber. It helps
you organize your thoughts and tell an engaging story. It also allows you to speak
clearly, avoiding common mistakes we all make when speaking. Messing up a
word. Saying "um" too many times. Forgetting what you wanted to say altogether.
You can fix this by writing a good video script for YouTube. This guide will show
you how to make it engaging, natural, and definitely not cheesy.
- 27 -
2. Identify Your Target Audience
It also helps to know who your viewers are before writing a script. This detail is
usually related to your YouTube niche. Are you making videos for teen gamers?
College students who study abroad? Single dads who seek parenting advice?
With those details in mind, ask yourself what information viewers want or need
from the video you're planning. Then try to deliver that value.
This process is called speaking to your target audience. And the best way to do
that is by researching their daily challenges, joys, and desires. Then you can craft
a video that solves a problem or intensifies their joys.
Most of this research happens on YouTube, so click here to learn the basics of
keyword research. You'll learn how often people search for your video's topic, the
words they use when searching, and related topics you can use to build out the
video.
Luckily you don't have to build this from scratch. You can use a well-known
YouTube video script format, then personalize it for your content.
Alina Iatiuc, creative producer at vidIQ, writes scripts for the vidIQ channel. Here's
the YouTube script template she uses, plus a few tips to make it your own:
Section 1: Video hook/intro
Section 2: Main content and research
Section 3: CTA (call to action)
Section 4: YouTube end-screen elements
- 28 -
Another thing you want to do is present the main problem you're solving.
For example, we have a YouTube script titled "Trick Anyone into Watching Your
Videos." The video hook introduces the problem (no one is watching your videos),
promises a solution, entertains viewers, and taps into their emotions:
"Warning! This video will help you learn to hack peoples' minds and trick anyone
into watching your videos using science and proven facts."
The hook is brief, engaging, and makes the viewer curious enough to keep
watching. Press play below to see what we mean!
But there's more than one way to do this. In fact, here are eight ideas to hook
viewers in the first eight seconds.
- 29 -
Topic 5-2: 8 Ways to Make Your Script More Engaging
There's planning a video script, and then there's doing the actual writing. Here's
how to make sure what you write becomes an entertaining video.
1. Use Short Sentences: Long sentences are difficult to read, hear, and
understand. That's why you should write shorter sentences for your video script
and keep things casual. You'll reduce the information viewers hear so they can
follow your train of thought.
At the same time, you don't want every sentence to be brief. Vary the length of
your sentences, so they flow like a natural conversation between friends.
2. Use the Present Tense: Writing in the present tense creates a sense of urgency.
You'll communicate in the here and now, grabbing viewers' attention to keep them
engaged.
3. Write in a Conversational Style: YouTube is pretty laid-back, so use simple
words and phrases anyone can understand. You don't want to sound like you're
delivering an academic speech or giving a research presentation. At the same
time, don't make your script so informal that it sounds off-putting.
4. Use More Active Voice Than Passive Voice: When you write in the active voice,
the subject of a sentence performs an action on something else – a person, idea,
or thing. A sentence written in the passive voice doesn't reveal the subject
upfront, which gets confusing.
Active voice: Joseph adopted three puppies last winter, and they're growing fast.
Passive voice: Three puppies were adopted by Joseph last winter, and they're
growing fast.
The passive sentence requires more effort to understand.
5. Keep it Simple: Remove unnecessary words, sentences, and scenes from your
script if they don't add to the story.
6. Sprinkle in Some Humor: Humor adds a cheery, light-hearted tone to your
video. Just don't go overboard by cracking offensive jokes that make people feel
uncomfortable.
7. Edit Your Script Several Times: Good writing doesn't happen overnight, so read
your script and revise it until you're satisfied.
8. Seek Feedback: It's helpful to get feedback before publishing a YouTube video.
You can ask friends and family what they think or get serious feedback from a
scriptwriter.
- 30 -
prioritizing your viewers and no one else. “A YouTube video script is engaging
when a content creator understands their audience and writes for the people and
not for the ego,” Alina says. “Before starting to write a script, I ask myself: "What
is the problem I want to help my audience solve? How can I solve it so that
people find the solution helpful?”
Jake tweeted a list of powerful phrases a few months ago, and they'll help you
speed up the brainstorming process:
Change my life
The truth about
I stopped
I regret
Do this
In [time frame]
Beginner
Without
You're doing it wrong
This is what I'd do
Jake says these phrases have a high rate of success on YouTube. They're effective
at getting viewers interested in a video, which leads to more clicks.
Now that you've seen the phrases, here's how to use them in emotional,
- 31 -
click-worthy titles.
1. Curiosity
Curiosity drives clicks more than any other emotion, Jake says. But how do you
awaken this feeling in YouTube viewers?
The first step is to be vague. Withhold some information so viewers have to click
to find out what's really happening in your video. In other words, create a
mystery!
For example, there's a viral push-up challenge on The Next Workout channel. The
point of the challenge is to do push-ups to a song called "Bring Sally Up." But
cleverly, the creator didn't reveal this information in the title. Instead of writing
something like, "Push-Up Challenge to Bring Sally Up," they wrote something along
the lines of, "This Push-Up Challenge Will Change Your Life in 30 Days.“
Why does this work? It blends two power phrases from Jake's list: "Change my life"
plus the idea of doing so "in" a specific time frame. It makes you wonder, What
kind of challenge can change my life in 30 days? Simply asking the question
makes you want to watch the video.
2. Fear
As humans, we're wired to avoid pain and suffering. That's why we have an
emotional response to anything that feels threatening. We sweat, engage in
fight-or-flight behaviors, and do other impulsive things in the heat of the moment.
Clicking on a YouTube video can be impulsive too. If you see a video about
something important in your life — but there's terrible news involved — how
fast will you watch the video to learn more? Our guess: lightning fast.
Finance creators like Graham Stephan know how to evoke such fear. They'll write
nerve-wracking YouTube titles like "The Largest Housing Crash Is Coming" or "Why
I Stopped Buying Stocks." In fact, the stocks video drove so much fear that it got
over 300,000 views.
But if you look even closer, there are more reasons someone would watch that
video:
"Is my money safe in the stock market?" "Should I stop investing like Graham did?"
These are questions anyone would ask after reading Graham's video title. But
watching the video is the only way to get answers.
- 32 -
3. Desire
Lastly, write titles that capture a basic human desire. Depending on your channel's
focus, that could be money, success, companionship, tasty food, well-being, power,
or travel experiences. People have many desires, so this is where understanding
your YouTube niche and how your viewers think comes in handy.
See anything familiar? Scroll back up to Jake's power phrases, and you'll notice
this title uses the "you're doing it wrong" formula.
After seeing a statement like that, viewers will ask themselves, "What am I doing
wrong?" That moment of self-reflection brings them one step closer to clicking on
the video. After all, there's a hidden piece of information, and they want to know
what it is.
- 33 -