Syllabus ARTH367
Syllabus ARTH367
COURSE OBJECTIVES
• Develop a critical understanding of the history of modernist architecture in North America
• Learn how to define modernism as it relates to architecture and acquire the appropriate
terminology
• Critically analyze modernist architecture first-hand
• Learn a well-rounded, cross-cultural approach to addressing modernist culture and
architectural history as whole
SCHEDULE (Subject to Change)
JANUARY 7: Course Overview and Methodologies for Teaching Modernism in North America
JANUARY 14: Intro to Modernism: Influences, Foundations, and The Chicago School
JANUARY 21: The Prairie School and the Legacy of Organic Architecture
JANUARY 28: California and the Southwest Reading Response Due at Beginning of Class
FEBRUARY 4: No Class / Time to meet with your group, and/or visit buildings
FEBRUARY 11: American East Coast: The Harvard School and High Modernism
FEBRUARY 18: American Midwest / Building Presentations Begin: Groups 1, 2 and 3
FEBRUARY 25: Mid-Term Break / No Class
MARCH 4: Mexico / Groups 4, 5, 6
MARCH 11: Canada / Groups 7, 8, 9
MARCH 18: Hippie Modernism and Counterculture / Groups 10, 11, 12
MARCH 25: Modernism in Film, Photography, and Contemporary Art / Screening of Un Soleil
Difficile and accompanying Guest Lecture by François Lemieux (Montreal-based artist)
1
APRIL 1: Modern Art and Architecture: Transatlantic exchanges between Europe and the
Americas, Guest Lecture by Dr. Nicola Pezolet (Associate Professor, Concordia) / Groups 13,
14, 15
APRIL 8: The Caribbean/ Postmodernism/ General Exam Review / Groups 16, 17, 18 + Other
Groups Present if Needed
DNE (Drop Date with Refund): Jan 21, 2019
DISC (Drop Date without Refund): March 18, 2019
REQUIREMENTS
You are required to attend lectures and complete the assigned readings before the class in
question. Your written assignments must be submitted both as a hard copy (in class) and online
(via Moodle). All requirements are to be completed on their scheduled date. There are no
extensions or make-up exams, except in the case of illness (must be proven with doctor’s note).
Late assignments will be docked 5% per day.
EVALUATION
Reading Response, 15%, Due January 28
Choose one reading from the first four weeks of class (whichever is most appealing to you) and
write a 250 word response (one page, double spaced). This should be a concise, critical
analysis of the work i.e. What were the main points presented by the author? Did you find their
argument to be successful? Could you easily make a counter-argument? What questions does
this article or chapter spur for you?
Building Case-Study: Presentation, 20%, See Schedule for Group Number/Date
As part of a group of three, prepare a short but well thought-out presentation on a modernist
building in Montreal. The presentations should be between 10 and 15 minutes long and each
person must speak for an equal amount of time. You are also required to prepare one
corresponding discussion point/question to be delivered at the end of your presentation (NB:
The class will not be asked to respond immediately to your talking point, but we will have a
general discussion after all presentations are done for the day).
If one person in the group does not do their portion of the work, the others will not be
penalized. As such, very clear individual roles will be assigned within the groups. You will be
asked to cover three aspects of the building - one aspect for each person in the group:
1) General history of the building - Architect, Date, When/Why it was built etc.
2) The physical experience of walking through or around the building - Essentially, a
‘building tour’ through photos. Also think about how it fits into its surroundings. For ex:
Does it blend in with the surrounding buildings, or stick out?
3) How this building connects to/ fits into modernism a whole - For example, what other
similar examples can you find? Is the architect well-known/ associated with a particular
form of modernism, or with a group/collective of other architects?
An example of a talking point or question at the end could be something as simple as – Would
you want to live or work in this building? Why or why not?
2
Groups will be formed in class on January 14th and I will assign each group a different building. I
suggest creating a google drive for your group, and compiling your images into a single
PowerPoint or pdf to present. Then, for example, each person will address 3 slides.
This assignment encourages students to critically analyze architecture first hand. It also
emphasizes co-learning and collaborative work. Each member of the group will be required to
visit the building, and document the work. As stated above, you will then be asked to “walk us
through” or “around” the structure as part of your presentation (depending on whether or not you
are permitted to go inside). This will also require you to describe and critique the building based
on principles you have learned in class, and your own individual background research. See
‘Written Analysis’ section for more ideas on the types of information you can include in your
presentation. While it is recommended, you do not necessarily have to visit the buildings
together as a group. Allocation will be made for groups to meet during class time.
NB: I understand that due to physical constraints it may not be possible for a student to visit their building
in person. If this is the case, please let me know and we can discuss an alternative arrangement.
Building Case-Study: Written Analysis, 30%, Due one week after your presentation
This is the written, critical analysis of the building you are assigned as part of your group. It is an
extension of your presentation work and should demonstrate what you learned from compiling
your presentation and discussing this building with your group/with the class. It should be clear
and concise, and be approximately 750 - 1000 words (3 - 4 pages, double-spaced). Feel free to
use first person as I am interested in your subjective experience of the building. However, you
must also research and discuss the history of the building. Who is the architect? What are they
known for? How does this building fit into, or not fit into their larger canon of work? What social,
political and/or technological developments was it connected to? What modernist principles does
this building demonstrate, and how does it fit into the history of modernism as a whole?
Final Exam: 35%, Date TBA
The exact content is to be determined, but this will certainly require you to draw upon the
knowledge you have gleaned from the class lectures and readings (including your own
presentations on Montreal buildings). It will likely take the form of an architectural analysis and
short essay. The exam date is yet to be set, but will occur in April after classes have finished.
COURSE MATERIAL
Each week, we will read a primary text and/or a scholarly article or book chapter. Readings will
be available in the electronic course reserves section on Moodle, unless otherwise indicated.
While not mandatory for the course, I would also recommend William Curtis’s Modern
Architecture Since 1900 and Kenneth Frampton’s Modern Architecture: A Critical History (4th
Edition) for students who are looking for a good primer on the topic. I will also try to make both
available in the course reserve room at Webster library.
EMAIL
Emails must be limited to more technical, or very specific questions. For longer discussions,
please come to my office hours, or if it is very time sensitive, we can possibly speak on the
phone.
3
CLASS CONDUCT
Please wait until after class has finished to ask me questions (i.e. do not approach me before
class unless it is very urgent as it may delay the class). As per emails, please come to my office
hours for questions which are not specific or technical.
TECHNOLOGY POLICY IN THE CLASSROOM
You are allowed to use computers in the classroom to facilitate note taking. However, you are
not allowed to engage in other types of activities using phones, tablets or computers, whether it
is work for other classes, social networking, gaming, or texting, as it keeps the student from
listening and participating fully, and it may also distract the other students in the classroom. It is
also forbidden to capture images of other students, as it infringes on Canadian privacy laws.
RECORDING POLICY
I do not permit students to record my lectures. This is also for your benefit, and to encourage
active listening.
PLAGIARISM
The most common offense under the Academic Code of Conduct is plagiarism which the Code
defines as “the presentation of the work of another person as one’s own or without proper
acknowledgement.” This could be material copied word for word from books, journals, internet
sites, professor’s course notes, etc. It could be material that is paraphrased but closely
resembles the original source. It could be the work of a fellow student, for example, an answer
on a quiz, data for a lab report, a paper or assignment completed by another student. It might be
a paper purchased through one of the many available sources. Plagiarism does not refer to
words alone – it can also refer to copying images, graphs, tables, and ideas. “Presentation” is
not limited to written work. It also includes oral presentations, computer assignments and artistic
works. Finally, if you translate the work of another person into French or English and do not cite
the source, this is also plagiarism.
In Simple Words:
DO NOT COPY, PARAPHRASE OR TRANSLATE ANYTHING FROM ANYWHERE WITHOUT
SAYING FROM WHERE YOU OBTAINED IT!*
*(Source: The Academic Integrity Website:
http://provost.concordia.ca/academicintegrity/plagiarism/)
CITATION GUIDES
If you are uncertain of how to properly cite work, please consult the The Concordia Library
Citation and Style Guides: http://library.concordia.ca/help/howto/citations.html
The Purdue Writing Lab is also an excellent online resource and includes examples of how to
cite in four standard styles: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html
WRITING CHALLENGES
In grading your assignments, good writing (that is, grammar, sentence structure, clarity of ideas,
strength of argument, etc.) will be taken into account as part of your evaluation. If you would like
assistance with your writing, or would like the help of an editor, please visit:
4
Student Learning Services: Counselling and Development, Hall Building,
H-440
Tel. 848 2424, ext. 3545
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://learning.concordia.ca/
HEALTH AND PERSONAL DIFFICULTIES
If you are experiencing health or personal difficulties that impede your work or attendance,
please contact me as soon as possible, and do not wait until you’ve fallen behind. We can likely
arrange to make accommodations.
CONCORDIA SERVICES
Please note, there are a range of services available to you as students at Concordia:
Health Services: 514-848-2424, ext. 3565, http://www.health.concordia.ca
Counseling: 514-848-2424, ext. 3545, http://cdev.concordia.ca
Advocacy and Support Services: http://supportservices.concordia.ca/
Student Transition Centre: http://stc.concordia.ca/
New Student Program: http://newstudent.concordia.ca/
Access Centre for Students with Disabilities: http://supportservices.concordia.ca/disabilities/
(NB: You must contact the Office for Students with Disabilities at least two weeks before your
exam to make special arrangements)
Student Success Centre: http://studentsuccess.concordia.ca/
Financial Aid & Awards: http://web2.concordia.ca/financialaid/
GRADING
Art History Grading System
A+ 90-100 B+ 77-79 C+ 67-69 D+ 57-59 F 0-49
JANUARY 7: Course Overview and Methodologies for Teaching Modernism in North
America
Mercer, Kobena, “Art History after Globalisation: Formations of the Colonial Modern,” in
Avermaete, Tom, Serhat Karakayali, and Marion Osten eds., Colonial Modern:
Aesthetics of the Past, Rebellions for the Future (London: Black Dog Publishing Ltd.,
2014), 232-242.
5
JANUARY 14: Intro to Modernism: Influences, Foundations, and The Chicago School
Curtis, William J. R., “Introduction,” and “Industrialization and the City: The Skyscraper as Type
and Symbol” in Modern Architecture Since 1900 (London: Phaidon Press, 1996), 11-17
and 33-51.
JANUARY 21: The Prairie School and the Legacy of Organic Architecture
“Evening 1” Wright, Frank Lloyd. An Organic Architecture: The Architecture of
Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1970), 1-8 (Evening 2 Optional).
Birmingham, Elizabeth, “The Case of Marion Mahony Griffin and The Gendered Nature of
Discourse in Architectural History,” Women’s Studies, vol. 35, no. 2 (2006): 87-123.
JANUARY 28: California and the Southwest
Narath, Albert, “Modernism in Mud: R. M. Schindler, the Taos Pueblo and a Country Home in
Adobe Construction,” Journal of Architecture, vol. 13, no. 4 (August 2008): 407-426.
Neutra, Richard J., “Chapters 24 and 25,” in Survival Through Design (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1984), 179-191.
FEBRUARY 11: American East Coast: The Harvard School and High Modernism
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell, and Philip Johnson, The International Style (New York: MoMa,
1932).
NB: The above is a full exhibition catalogue, however, the text portion is not very long. I would
like you to take a look at the full book, as it is important that you get a sense of how the
architecture was presented here.
Frampton, Kenneth, “The Eclipse of the New Deal: Buckminster Fuller, Phillip Johnson
and Louis Kahn,” in Modern Architecture: A Critical History (London: Thames & Hudson,
2014), 238-246.
Moholy-Nagy, Sibyl, “The Diaspora,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 24,
no. 1, 1965: 24-26.
Moholy-Nagy, Sibyl, “The Future of the Past,” Perspecta, vol. 7, 1961: 65-76.
FEBRUARY 25: Reading Week (No Class)
MARCH 4: Mexico
Eggener, Keith L. “Contrasting Images of Identity in the Post-War Mexican Architecture
of Luis Barragan and Juan O'Gorman,” Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, vol.
9, no.1 (2000): 27-45.
6
MARCH 11: Canada
Cardinal, Douglas, and George Melnyk, “The Human Organism and the Mechanical Grid,” and
“The Indian Concept of Oneness,” in Of the Spirit: Writings (Edmonton: NeWest Press,
1977), 34-39 and 55-57.
Milosz, Magdalena, “Instruments as Evidence: An Archive of the Architecture of Assimilation,”
Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada, vol. 41, no. 2 (2016): 3-10.
MARCH 18: Hippie Modernism and Counterculture
April 1: Modern Art and Architecture: Transatlantic exchanges between Europe and the
America - Guest Lecture: Dr. Nicola Pezolet (Associate Professor, Concordia)
Golan, Romy, "L'Éternel Décoratif: French Art in the 1950s," Yale French Studies,
vol. 98 (2000): 98-118.
APRIL 8: The Caribbean/ Postmodernism/ General Exam Review
Carranza, Luis E, and Fernando L. Lara. “Fidel Castro, in Conversation with Ernesto “Che”
Guevara Decides to Convert a Golf Course into Art Schools in Cuba” Modern
Architecture in Latin America. Art, Technology, and Utopia. (Austin: University of Texas
Press, 2015), 214-217.
Lawton, Jacquiann, “Social and Public Architecture in Kingston, Jamaica” in The Modern
Movement in the Caribbean Islands: Docomomo Journal, vol. 33 (2005), 58-63.
Gallo, Emmanuelle and Doucet, Jean, “Martinique, Case Studies in Modernism” in The Modern
Movement in the Caribbean Islands: Docomomo Journal, vol. 33 (2005), 72-19.