Tyre Modelling For Use in Vehicle
Tyre Modelling For Use in Vehicle
~.A
~
e
The Engineering Society
For Advancing Mobility
~ Land Sea Air and Space 400 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE WARRENDALE, PA 15096
hni
a r rl s
870421
The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of this paper indicates
SAE's consent that copies of the paper may be made for persona! or intern;)l use, cr
for the personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the con·
dition, however, that the copier pay the stated per article copy fee through the
Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Operations Center, P.O, Box 765, Schenectady,
N.Y. 12301, for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S.
Copyright Law. 'This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as
copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for
creating new collective works, or for resale.
Papers published prior to 1978 may also be copied at a per paper tee of $2.50
under the above stated conditions.
SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of
publication. Direct your orders to SAE Ordp.r Department.
ISSNOI48· 7191
Copyright © 1987 Society of Automotive Engineers,lnc.
This paper is subject to revision, Statements and opinions ad· Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for pre-
vanced in papers or discussion are the author's and arc his sentation or publication through SAE should send the manu-
responsibility, not SAE's; however, the paper has been edited script or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to:
by SAE for uniform styling and fonnat. Discussion will be Secretary, Engineering Activity Board, SAE.
printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions.
For permission to publish this paper in fuU or in part, contact Printed in U.S.A.
the SAE Publications Division,
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Thursday, July 26, 2018
870421
0148·7191/87/0223·0421 $02.50
Copyright 1987 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Thursday, July 26, 2018
2 870421
870421 3
torque characteristic (we find for C in those cases icients, which is able to describe all the measured
successively: 1.3, 1.65 and 2.4). With C determined characteristics. The four coefficients are:
by the shape and D determined by the peak value,
only B is left to control the stiffness. B= stiffness factor
Still Eq. (2) is not good enough to describe C= shape factor
every possible measured characteristic. There may D= peak factor
be a need for an additional coefficient which E= curvature factor
makes it possible to accomplish a local extra
stretch or compression of the curve. The coefficient So far, the characteristics are assumed to pass
E has been introduced into the formula in such a through the origin. In reality, however, this will
way that stiffness and peak value remain not always be the case. Due to ply steer, conicity
unaffected. and rolling resistance, the characteristics will be
shifted in the horizontal and/or vertical directions
Y = D sin (C arctan (B¢)) (Fig. 2), In order to fit the measured
with (4) characteristics, these shifts should be included in
¢ = (I-E) X + (EfB) arctan (BX) the equation. We obtain:
The influence of E on the side force characteristic Y = D sin (C arctan (B¢)) + Sy (5)
has been shown in Fig. 2. Similar effects occur with
with the self aligning torque and brake force ¢ = (I-E) (X + Sh) + (EfB) arctan (B (X + Sh))
characteristics. Sh = horizontal shift
The result is an equation with four coeff- Sy = vertical shift
Side force I
-
Fy [NI I
6000 - I Sh
-
T - -.. ;"-;;'~':::'---- --
I
4000 - ' .",-
I
.' /""
/~/
I
0
2000 I
I
-I
BCD
1-" 10 "5 L...
-15 -10 -5 5
° I Slip angle a [deg.J
5v
-2 -I
I
-I
/....::"/~OOO I
__
," ..-0' I
------:: .............
-6000 - I
I _EeoO
__ O<E< 1
•••• E < 0
I
I
I
4 870421
THE MEASUREMENTS - Full scale tyre quadratical correction curves around the meas-
measurements have been carried out on a dry ured points. Finally, the average was taken of two
asphalt road. The experiments were conducted or more a-sweeps.
with a specially built test trailer under steady- The measurements during pure braking were
state conditions. The measured quantities are: carried out by gradually increasing the brake
the side force (Fy), pressure until wheel lock occurs. The data was
- the brake force (Fx), collected while the longitudinal slip was increased
- the self aligning torque (M z)' from 0 to 100% (K-sweep). Here also a
These forces and torque were measured during condensation, correction and averaging process
pure cornering, pure braking or during combin- has been carried out. The experiments on
ations of cornering and braking. During cornering, combined cornering and braking were conducted
the speed was 70 km/h and during braking 60 by doing K-sweeps at fixed values of the slip angle.
krnlh. The tests included variations of slip angle The camber angle was fixed at zero degrees.
(-10 to 14 deg.), vertical load (2, 4, 6, 8 kN) and FITTING MEASURED DATA- The data
camber angle (-5, 0, 5 deg.l. obtained after processing in the way described
The pure cornering tests were carried out by above has been used as raw input data for the
slowly varying the slip angle (a-sweep) from zero fitting process. An optimization program from the
to the maximum value, from there to the NAG library has been used to obtain the four
minimum value and back to zero again. The coefficients and two shifts for every measured
measured data was condensed per 1/4 degree characteristic. For one of the measured tyres, the
intervals to one measured point per interval. After resulting coefficients have been tabulated in Table
that, corrections were made for load variations, 1. .The vertical shift obtained for the brake forces
which occurred during the tests, by making use of represents the value for the rolling resistance.
Table 1
Coefficients for tyre formula (first fit)
(a [deg.], K [%])
LOAD
B C D E Sh Sv BCD
(kNl
870421 5
10 15
Slip \logla a ldog.] "o Idog.]
S lip ongle
- 100 ~
*F, 6000N
-150 .
.. M."ulom."I'
:-!!L.'':_~
Fig. 3 - Side force characteristic fitted using the Fig. 4 - Self aligning torque characteristic fitted
tyre formula compared with measured using the tyre formula compared with
data. measured data.
Blah lorco
-F>lIN]
oooo:~
- -................J
'000
Mouutomoni.
!,., F, _ 6000N i
6 870421
Figures 3, 4 and 5 show comparisons between (aligning stiffness) characteristics, we use the
measurements (after processing) and fitted approximation:
characteristics for one specific load. The result is
very satisfactory: the formula is able to describe a3 F z' + a4 F z
all the measured characteristics. BCD=---- (8)
At the moment, the shifts are not of particular
interest for further examination and are therefore
put equal to zero (Le. ply steer, conicity and roll- The shape factor (e) appears to be practically
ing resistance will not be taken into account). If independent ofF z. We take for:
so required, it is possible to add the shifts later on. the side force C= 1.30
INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL LOAD - To the brake force C= 1.65 (9)
reduce the total number of quantified coefficients the self aligning torque: C= 2.40
(Table 1) and to be able to calculate forces and
torques at vertical loads which are different from The stiffness factor (B) is found by dividing the
the values used in the measurements, it is necess- stiffness by the shape and the peak factor.
ary to include the vertical load explicitly in the
formula. To do so, the coefficients have to be B = BCD/CD (IO)
written as a function of the vertical load (F z).
The peak factor (D) as a function ofF z may be Finally, the curvature factor (E) as a function of F z
approximately represented by the relationship: is given by:
(6) (I 1)
For the stiffness (BCD) of the side force character- After processing the raw data again (corrected
istic (cornering stiffness), we take the formula: for the earlier determined horizontal and vertical
shifts) with the aid of the optimization program,
the new coefficients are obtained. Table 2 gives the
coefficients for the same tyre as in Table 1, but
and for the stiffness of both brake force (longitud- now incl uding the infl uence of the vertical load.
inal slip stiffness) and self aligning torque
Table 2
Coefficients for tyre formula (with load influence)
(Fz[kNJ)
al a2 a3 a4 a5 as a7 as
Fy -22.1 1011 1078 1.82 0.208 0.000 -0.354 0.707
Mz -2.72 -2.28 -1.86 -2.73 0.110 -0.070 0.643 -4.04
Fx -21.3 1144 49.6 226 0.069 -0.006 0.056 0.486
. Table 3
Coefficients for tyre formula connected with camber influence
(y [deg.])
__ F,
8000 tJ
fiOCXlN
':OOON
._F, 2000 'j
10 Hi .'
Slip angln Q Ideg.1
...........
l "" Ideg.1
S lip "ngle
. .>
/
I - - - - -............~... / O~,
*X F,
fiOOOll
~OOON
••• f,
-"
BOOO N
Boool<
'00
/
/' ., ""
x "
8000 rl
6000 rl
4000 r,
F, 4000r~ __ F, 4000 N 150 + F, 2000 r,
.......................0."4>·0 + f, 2000r, ._ F, 20001< ,:;'
i
Fig. 6 - Side force characteristics fitted using the Fig. 7 - Self aligning torque characteristics fitted
tyre formula which includes the influence using the tyre formula which includes the
of the vertical load, compared with meas- influence of the vertical load, compared
ured data. with measured data.
l"uko lo.eo
-F~ INI
t't.".III."
........,••••I"••••" ••• jS .
• •
SO 75
~ longitudinal slip
-~ 1%1
""'" MN,u,.",.n,.
t. "10
•, " BOOO
6000 N
.••• F,
-',
BlXX} N
6000 'I
" 4000 ••
__ F,
4000 'I
""'" + ""
X
2000 II ._F, 2000 N
8 870421
dFy/dp dFy/da
IN/dog,1 "00 IN/dllg·1 I,•••• F, 80001;1
_f, 600011
-_F, .:000 /j
1200 -.
!~:;~F;--~ 6OOOrJ! "00 ~_F: 2000 N
_F, 6000~l
__ F, .10CXl rl
0.:;.• ••••••••••
,.-F, 2000N I "'00
"'\.....
'00
\.
\\,
600 - . . . . "
'00
\
... \
........... '00 \. \ '.
, \. \_\ \...~
"'00 4000 6000
-200 ~
Slip l,lngle (>
"
[dll!!.)
Sido IOlee
Fy IN]
Fig. 9 - Calculated slope of side force characteris- Fig. 10 - Calculated slope of side force characteris-
tics as a function of slip angle for different tics as a function of side force for different
vertical loads. vertical loads.
//.......•..•............\.
OOt; -
,=--:-F, ~ 2000~_ '" ...•........................................
,""'1-----_.
••••
1-;;;;;-;;;:;;
t::: ....~~~
/I.~·' \\\
••••••
;?>-- I'
,,/
",/./
# 4
I
' , ' ,
"_ '........
••••••
••••
"'-''''''-_~'..;;;.''"",,-~~
'"
, \ ) \
_5 0 5 10
Slip ongJo" [deg.]
-'. J 4000 6000 .J Side lorce
Fy INI
1
Fig. 11 - Calculated pneumatic trail as a function Fig. 12· Calculated pneumatic trail as a function
of slip angle for different loads. of side force for different loads.
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Thursday, July 26, 2018
870421 9
The new parameter a3 for the side force indicates pure cornering and braking conditions, will be
the maximum possible cornering stiffness gener- used now in a mode which describes the beha viour
ated by the tyre. of the tyre at zero camber angle when a combin-
A comparison between measurements and the ation of cornering and braking takes place. The
newly obtained characteristics has been shown in modelling process implies the use of the basic tyre
Figs. 6,7 and 8. The influence of the vertical load is modelling theory as described in [31.
now included without much loss in accuracy. Figure 13 shows a top view of a tyre during
INFLUENCE OF CAMBER -The total num- combined cornering and braking. The force and
ber of coefficients to be quantified may be reduced torque acting on the tyre and the velocity of the
even more by including camber in the formula as wheel have been indicated:
well. The influence of camber (y) is incluced by the total force with components in lateral and
adding two shifts and a possible change in stiff- longitudinal direction (Fy and F x),
ness. The two additional shifts are: the self aligning torque (M z),
the speed in the direction of tra vel V which is
composed of the slip speed vector (V s ) and the
(2) rolling speed vector (Vr) of the tyre.
(3)
-
~IV
1-
10 870421
It'"
(16) I ............ - F yo
,, ,.- -....
= VsylVr = -tana/(I + K) "
6000 fl
ay
I I .......
------ -------------
where we had: II ' - _....
JI
/I
1/ V --_....
----- "
---------
llOOO N
(17) ""
II
II
--- ....
II I
------------------ "
.1000 tl
"""/
'
As stated before, the theory is valid for a tyre
with isotropic properties (the same characteristic
.u'
I'
I'
,I' /""--------- --------- - - " 2000 II
Fx = -(axla) F xo (a)
Fy = -(ayla) Fyo (a) (18)
. . . . -r-- . . __ F.c>
""'" ,---:::=F=:::::---------------,
F = YF x' + Fy' ,I' I --____ _ f
yo
! -L --------_
1 -----_
The original basic curves are obtained by calcula-
ting Fx and Fy in pure conditions and writing them 6000 /
1
/ ........ -T--------___ f,
----
1I000N
I --------
A problem of physical nature arises when the
values of the slip connected with the peak values
4000
"f(
I'
I'
"" I /"
I
----- _
-----
f, 4000!1
of F xo and Fyo differ considerably from each other. ,1
~
"
At a slip a in between these two peaks, we have the
situation that total slip would occur on one curve 2000: . . . . ------------------- _
".Y
, '/I I
and partial sliding on the other. In reality, the tyre I
11
870421
0*
1
----------------------------------
!t
- - - - - - - - - 1"- I
I
I Ed
I
I
I
I
I
-F x
I
1 I ' ..0*
I
I
I
I
\ \ I
\',. ."..... . . . . Fyo
I
!
, '- ---
_- _
------~_..!-_-----
........
.
Fy
Fig. 16 - Visualization of determination of magnitude and direction of the total horizontal force Fusing
the normalized basic characteristics, starting out from a given normalized slip vector (cf. Figs. 17,
18 for the factor Cd).
F, 6000 N
F: 6000 N
FI ,4000N
F, 2000N
~.:::
F, " 2000N
12 870421
The basic curves, but now as a function of 0* f'igure 16 shows the contruction of the total
have been shown in Fig. 15. On both characteris- horizontal force. The magnitude of Cd will be 1 for
tics (Fxo and Fyo), partial sliding occurs for values small values of 0* and Oym/oxm for large values of
of 0* smaller than 1 and total sliding for values 0*. For intermediate values of a* the value for Cd is
larger than 1. With 0* as the new slip the determined from the measured relationships
equations (18) become: during combined cornering and braking. Figures
17 and 18 show e"amples of the variation of Cd
Fx = -(ax */0*) F xo (0*) (o*,F z, a) for different loads and slip angles.
F y = -(Oy */0*) Fyo (0*) (20) Because of the action of the brake force, the
resulting cornering stiffness of the tyre appears to
F = YF/ + Fy" become larger. For this reason, the basic normal-
ized side force characteristic has been given an
The direction of the total force is now based on initial slope which is a function of the brake force.
the direction of a'. For small values of 0*, Eq. (20) This can easily be achieved by adjusting the
is correct since then the forces will be independent coefficient B for the side force. The increment of B
and the linear relations hold: is:
870421 13
.= ,---="-.,,----=...,,,,-----------------, ,= ,--------------------------,
Sidtl 10leo F IN]y F, 800011
F, 6000 II Brake fOlco -Fl( [NI F, 6000 t<
~- F, £000" f, <100011
3 F, 4000'1 F, 200011
4_ f: 2000"
.................! .
......
-.•.............
. .
'. '.
....••.......•.......•...•........
~.
............•.......•.
..........•....................:.:::::.:.::::.::.:::
...................
'.
10 110 90 100 o 60 70 80 90 100
-Longitudinal 511p -~ 1%1 -longitudinal 511p -.0;:]%1
Fig. 19 - Side force and brake force vs longitudinal Fig. 20 - Side force and brake force vs longitudinal
slip at 2 degrees slip angle. slip at 5 degrees slip angle .
•= , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
Sid~ lorce
.=,-----------------------,
Side force
Fy IN] Fy [NI
,=
~ I--------'-'-"~=-'~:~. ~. ~. ~. "...... ..\
,= :--.~..~..~..~..-..-.----,,-"~.." ..../ / /
'=r-....~
..-
..........
Fig. 21· Side force vs brake force at 2 degrees slip Fig. 22 - Side force vs brake force at 5 degrees slip
angle. angle.
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Thursday, July 26, 2018
14 870421
>'*.:::·;::~:·~·F.
both the side force and the brake force will be
shifted which causes a contribution to the self , ., ;;;;,;;··iI'fm ..i INI
_150 I- ..."..."..'_~
~
Ccx and Ccy denoting the longitudinal and lateral
f, _ Ilooo r.
carcass stiffnesses respectively.
Figures 23 and 24 show comparisons between .,,,
calculations and measurements. The measured
characteristics have been corrected for an appar- .250L... -.J
ently constant offset of the line of action of the
brake force of approx. 15 mm. This means that Fig. 23 - Self aligning torque vs brake force at 2
even with a slip angle of zero, a large self aligning degrees slip angle.
torque is present. The overturning couple (M x) was
not measured, sono information is available about
the offset of the vertical force which may have
caused this. The measured values shown in Figs.
23 and 24 have been corrected for this phenome-
non, which is not yet fully understood. ",--------------------,
Sell aligning la/quo
POSSIBLE EXTENSIONS - The model so far M11Nmi
5 ~og
of the tyre such as slip stiffnesses and peak values <>
870421 15
This paper is subject to revision. Statements and opinions ad· Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for pre-
vanced in papers or discussion are the author's and are his sentation or publication through SAl should send the manu-
responsibility, not SAE's; however. the paper has been edited script or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to:
by SAl for uniform styling and fonnat. Discussion will be Secretary, Fn/;-tinecring Activity Board, SAl:.
printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions.
For permission to publish this paper in full or in part, conta\.·t Printed in U.S.A.
the SAl Publications Division.
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Thursday, July 26, 2018