Final Project: Fatima Jinnah Women University
Final Project: Fatima Jinnah Women University
Final Project
Select any literary work which has classical allusions and
analyze how the author/poet/writer has used the
allusion/s and how does the allusion/s affect the
interpretation of the work.
Instructor:
Ms. Zohra Fatima
Submitted By:
TayyabaHafeez
(2019-B.Eng-048)
Date of Submission:
March 21, 2021
2
INTRODUCTION
The word ‘myth’ has been defined and understood differently by different people.
Though common men usually seem to have a tendency to misunderstand myth as ‘fairytale’,
these are two entirely different things for literary figures. Susanne K. Langer has explained
the difference in clear terms extensively. He has stated that myth is a tool people use in
pursuit of their desire to understand the world and its nature. On the contrary, fairytale
originates from wishful thinking and serves the purpose of alleviating people’s social and
cultural dilemmas. As a result, myths are passed down by societies as true stories unlike
fairytales which are only meant to entertain. Hence, the importance of myth surpasses largely
that of fairytales. The continuing development and allusions to myths indicate their
importance to humans, who depend on myths to understand themselves, their own nature, the
nature of the world they live in and the realities of human life. Therefore, myth becomes
associated with religious, historical and mystic elements. (qtd. in Bidney 1950)
The significance of Greek mythology for English literary figures is evident from its
repetitive representation throughout the history of English literature. Since the Greek gods
and goddesses were always associated with certain elements of nature or with certain human
qualities, their tales would provide allegorical ideas to writers or poets of any era. As a result,
the figurative use of these myths to represent human nature or the natural phenomena thrives
even in today’s literature. The readers can also relate to characters or situations from these
myths because of the Greeks’ association of almost every myth to some reality of human life
or the world. As a result, readers who share common knowledge of these myths with the
authors are able to interpret the meaning of their works more deeply and very close to the
author’s original intentions. Using such metaphors from ancient cultural stories, writers are
3
also able to modify the tales to relate them even more to the modern context and create new
This research article will focus on the importance of Greek mythology to modern
literary figures by analyzing how their works still contain allusions to such myths even today.
In addition, the reasons for and the purpose of use of these allusions in contemporary times
will also be analyzed. For this purpose, I have selected the poem “Actaeon” by A.E.
Stallings, published in a poetry collection, Poems(2003). The poem takes a small scene from
a Greek myth and relates it to present day situations to convey the poet’s thoughts and
messages. The poet has used the myth of Actaeon and the goddess of hunt, Artemis, to
reflect upon human nature. She has made comparisons between the characters or situations
from the myth and the shortcomings of modern humans as well as the sad realities of modern
life. The focus is on one particular scene from the myth, Actaeon’s dying moment. A.E.
Stallings continuously reminds the modern reader of his faults in an indirect way by making
cruel remarks on Actaeon. As he is dying, she is continuously reminding him about the
phases of his life that give him great pain and regret in his final moment. In the process, she
has made the reasons for continuous classical allusions in literature of every era quite clear.
The selected poem recounts the Greek myth of Actaeon and Artemis. Actaeon was a
Greek hero, having the god Apollo as one of his great grandparents. He was also a hunter.
According to the myth, Artemis, the goddess of hunting, was taking a bath being helped by
some nymphs when Actaeon stumbled across her sight by chance. Awed by her beauty, he
continued to watch her instead of going back. Unfortunately for Actaeon, Artemis spotted the
hunter spying on her naked. This enraged the goddess. As a result, she punished him by
turning him into a stag. Looking at his own reflection in the water, Actaeon was terrified and
4
sad. He started making animal cries which were a signal for his dogs. They began their
His dogs, trained to perfection, were experienced enough never to miss their target.
They came rushing to their master’s voice in hopes of crushing yet another stag awaiting
them at the place where Actaeon shouted from. However, they did not know that the stag they
were going after was actually their master himself this time. Actaeon instantly foresaw the
eminent danger coming after him in the form of his own dear dogs and tried to escape.
However, despite his fast speed and utmost effort to run away and hide, his efficiently trained
dogs caught up to him and tore him to pieces as they would any other prey. Hence, his own
second to none pack of hunting dogs, fed since birth and trained to excellence by his own
hands became the key players for bringing upon him his grand punishment from the divine.
(Gregory 1958)
The above quoted version of the Greek myth is the most widely accepted. However,
there do exist some other versions of the story with some minor differences in the details. For
instance, one version states that the reason Artemis punished Actaeon was because of his
claim of being more skilled than the goddess. According to this version, Actaeon boasted of
his abilities, declaring his hunting to be more efficient and skillful than that of Artemis.
Consequently, he was punished by the goddess out of her anger and pride. Other versions
with some discrepancies are available. (Roman and Roman 2010) However, the first one
mentioned above is the one used for this analysis as well as the widely accepted one.
ANALYSIS
A.E. Stallings has focused on the dying Actaeon. She seems to be addressing him
while he is experiencing her wrath in the form of the worst punishment possible for a hunter.
A hunter who raised his dogs since their birth, fed them with his own hands and spent years
5
training them to help him in his life’s purpose is now suffering at the hands of the very dogs
that have always been like family to him. The poet is using this one moment, the hunter’s
dying moment, to teach a lesson to the reader in the guise of tormenting Actaeon.
Her subtle use of the second person throughout the poem makes her didactic aim even
more obvious. It is as if the reader is Actaeon and the persona of the poet is addressing them.
As an example, the first two lines of the poem are quoted here. The same pattern is followed
(Stallings 66)
By putting the reader in Actaeon’s shoes in this way, the relevance of this myth in
today’s age becomes clearer. The reader can feel what Actaeon must have felt at the time of
his death. Hence, being able to relate to this character from an ancient myth, we can see how
human nature remains the same irrespective of the times we live in. A mythical character
from ancient Greece reminding us of the reality of our life highlights a certain aspect of the
Greek society. They were people who understood human nature deeply. Therefore, the writer
found this myth as a tool to achieve her didactic aim in the poem.
The Role of Fate in Human Life and Pain from Our Closest Relationships
The persona repeatedly reminds Actaeon about the close relationship he shares with
his dogs. As he is being ripped between their teeth, the persona tells him how he knows each
one of them by name, how he can differentiate between them by their voices, and how he
6
used to feed and train them with his own hands. He is also reminded of the time when his
dogs were born and that he has been with them ever since they fed on their mother’s milk. In
addition, the poet mentions how extremely rare Actaeon’s dogs are by saying that he would
earn a great fortune if he were to sell them. This could be an indication that money is not as
important for the hunter. What he values the most in life is his relationship with his animals.
(Stallings 66)
Ironically, his most valued asset is bringing him to his doom. This is allegorical of our
reality as well. Oftentimes in life, we keep nurturing things that are not beneficial to us.
Unaware of the fact that they can cause great harm to us in future, we keep valuing them
more than other useful things in life. Ultimately, we keep playing into fate’s hands our entire
life. Also, sometimes it is our closest relationships that bring about the most dreadful
suffering for us. The people we consider most important in our life end up hurting us in the
cruelest ways possible. Our most trusted companions sometimes turn out to be snakes in the
grass. The pain felt in such a situation is similar to Actaeon’s. He was devastated
psychologically because he loved his dogs that were tearing him apart. Modern humans also
feel the same way when betrayed by people they love dearly.
Another interpretation of the poet’s constant and repetitive stress on the closeness of
Actaeon’s relationship with his dogs to express his pain at being ripped by them could also be
taken as an allegorical representation of how human beings always judge others based on
their appearances. The dogs were very faithful to their master. However, only because of a
change in their master’s appearance, they were treating him in the most ruthless manner. This
is allegorical of how the behavior of human beings toward other fellow humans is mostly
based on appearances. People judge others by the superfluous instead of their true inner
selves.
Similarly, a more closely resembling analogy for this event can be the present day
bond between parents and children. This can be inferred from the following lines of the
poem:
(Stallings 66)
Also, the following lines from the last stanza seem to be reflective of parental love and care:
(Stallings 66)
8
Parents give everything to raise their children to the best of their abilities. However,
many children today do not repay their parents the way they deserve it. Their rude behavior
toward parents on a daily basis, their refusal to take responsibility for aging parents and
leaving them alone in old age homes; all of this inflicts huge amount of pain on the parents.
However, they do not say anything and continue to love their children till the end just like
Actaeon’s love for his dogs. Reading this poem, one is bound to feel sympathetic toward
Actaeon. Consequently, if modern readers take this allegorical interpretation about parent-
child relationships into account, they are sure to feel guilty of their actions and be
The poet has also compared the hunting skills of the dogs to the words said by
humans in anger that they regret later on. Another relevance of an element of myth to our
times perfectly portrayed through comparison of the two situations by use of simile, shown as
follows:
(Stallings 66)
As the dogs were trained to never miss their target so that the hunter would always return
home having accomplished something, they were unstoppable once they heard their master’s
call. They would follow his voice and scent to stop only after ripping their prey into pieces.
9
The poet compares them to words that humans speak when in anger. At that particular
moment, we speak without thinking. Once calmed down, conscious thinking makes us regret
Spoken words cannot be taken back. Hence, humans are only left with regret just like
the hunter’s dogs that instinctively followed their master’s voice and the stag’s scent. Like an
angry human throwing a huge bunch of words at a rapid pace, the dogs ripped their master
without thinking. It was only later after having killed their master that his absence caused
panic among the dogs in much the same way as our own said words of anger cause
psychological panic and regret later. This is a representation of the fact that habits do not
involve thinking. They are carried out subconsciously. Therefore, we need to be aware of our
actions and their consequences at all times. Otherwise, we may end up hurting those dearest
to us and even ourselves in the long run because of recurring feelings of continuous regret
The poet reminds Actaeon about how he used to celebrate whenever his dogs
ruthlessly killed a stag. On the contrary, he feels sympathetic for the stags now.
(Stallings 66)
10
In his final moment, he is experiencing the pain all those stags suffered because of
him. This is quite relevant to human nature especially in our era. People live only to fulfill
their dreams and attain their own objectives. They use all means possible to create life better
for themselves without thinking about the consequences they might bring for others.
Countless people suffer in front of our eyes every day in the modern era. However, most of
us show little to no concern for them. Some do show a little sympathy but that’s it. We
become engaged in our busy lives after a short while and never again think about those who
are suffering. It is only after people go through the same thing as someone else that they
realize how much the other suffered and resultantly become sympathetic toward them. When
one’s own business faces huge loss, he understands how the poor make ends meet. When
one’s own family member dies, he realizes what hell the other people went through. It is a
reality that we can never truly understand the pain of anyone unless we experience the same
situation.
Regret is a big part of many people’s lives. Human keep making mistakes and keep
regretting them all their life. The poet depicts Actaeon to be regretting the work of his entire
life in his dying moment, having realized the pain he inflicted on the stags. Similarly, humans
keep sinning throughout their life without realizing their wrongdoings. It is only in their final
moment that they become aware of their bad deeds and regret them. If we accept our sinful
acts early on and try to change ourselves, we can avoid our encounter with ultimate regret at
the end of our lives. The poet’s depiction of Actaeon’s sympathetic feelings toward his past
prey also entails yet another lesson. Life should not be lived only for one’s own sake. The
effects of one’s actions on other people around them should be taken into consideration at
every step.
11
The poet asks Actaeon whether he knew why he was feeding his dogs and raising
them to become big, frightening and angry hunters. She is using irony to indicate that
whatever he did in life was to prepare for his death or for his ultimate punishment.
(Stallings 66)
He spent his entire life raising them. It was his passion from the beginning. He felt
great desire to raise them to become the fiercest creatures. Sadly, his own desire brought
about his doom. Her specific use of the word “passion” is very important here. It is
allegorical for today’s man who is driven by his desires and passions. People hanker after
their worldly wishes and material gains. But in the end, none of that comes to their rescue.
Instead, their worldly desires become a cause for their suffering in the afterlife. In addition,
running after material things brings nothing but loneliness, pain and solitude in the end.
Humans keep rearing their own doom their entire lives just like Actaeon. The hunter
can be relatable for modern reader as worldly and materialistic in approach because he just
wanted to kill as many a prey as possible to gain fame. Hence, we shouldn’t let our desires
control us. Self-control and logical thinking is crucial to live a good life and to avoid later
suffering. Wrong desires and too many desires both lead to later unrest in life.
Through the implications to different realities of human nature and life, the poet has
cleverly concealed messages throughout the poem. In the process of highlighting different
12
human weaknesses, she made ironic and harsh remarks about Actaeon. These are indirectly
meant for the modern reader so that he realizes his own faults. She seems to be achieving her
didactic aim successfully because the reader is just being informed of his faults and
weaknesses. He is not being commanded to overcome them. But through the indirect irony
and pitiless remarks of the poet toward Actaeon, the reader does feel guilty when they find
themselves relatable to the hunter. Hence, such indirect ways of being didactic in approach
seem to go a long way to impact the readers as compared to directly ordering them to change
their behavior.
CONCLUSION
The different realities of modern life and human nature hidden allegorically in the
poem indicate that the author’s aim was not simply to recount the Greek myth. Instead, her
initial motive and real aim must have been to present human nature and its inevitability
regardless of space and time. Consequently, the portrayal of a particular part of the myth
from hundreds of years ago seems to be the best way to depict this unchanging reality of
humans. In addition, by making comparisons with real life situations, she has presented a
small part of the myth in a very unique and innovative way. She seems to have made great
use of her interpretive powers to tell modern humans of their shortcomings while keeping the
importance of Greek mythology alive in literature of the current century as well. Using the
Greek myth as a cover for making ironic remarks on the faults and weaknesses of modern
humans seems to fulfill the poet’s didactic aim quite cleverly. What superficially seems to be
a series of tormenting remarks on the dying hunter is actually an indirect irony on modern
human nature and modern life realities. This indirect way of addressing the faults of modern
humans has a lot more impact on the reader than merely instructing them to change their
ways.
13
Works Cited
Bidney, David. “The Concept of Myth and the Problem of Psychocultural Evolution.”
American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 52, No. 1. Wiley. 1950. pp. 16-26.
Nivre, Elisabeth Waghall, et al. Allusions and Reflections: Greek and Roman Mythology in
Roman, Luke, and Monica Roman. Encyclopedia of Greek and Roman Mythology. Facts On
File. 2010.