The Reflective Cracking in Flexible Pavements
The Reflective Cracking in Flexible Pavements
1515/rjti-2015-0012
ROMANIAN JOURNAL
OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
Abstract
Reflective cracking is a major concern for engineers facing the problem of road
maintenance and rehabilitation. The problem appears due to the presence of cracks in the old
pavement layers that propagate into the pavement overlay layer when traffic load passes over
the cracks and due to the temperature variation. The stress concentration in the overlay just
above the existing cracks is responsible for the appearance and crack propagation throughout
the overlay. The analysis of the reflective cracking phenomenon is usually made by numerical
modeling simulating the presence of cracks in the existing pavement and the stress
concentration in the crack tip is assessed to predict either the cracking propagation rate or the
expected fatigue life of the overlay. Numerical modeling to study reflective cracking is made
by simulating one crack in the existing pavement and the loading is usually applied
considering the shear mode of crack opening. Sometimes the simulation considers the mode I
of crack opening, mainly when temperature effects are predominant.
1. REFLECTIVE CRACKING
Overlays are the most commonly used method for rehabilitating cracked
pavements. However, they often do not perform as expected because of existing
cracks that propagate through the newly constructed overlay within a short
period of time [1]. This problem is called “reflective cracking” and is well
identified when an overlay shows a crack pattern identical to that existing in the
old pavement. When an overlay is placed on a cracked pavement, the cracks in
the old pavement surface will propagate through the overlay and will appear in
the surface.
Reflective cracking is caused by thermal contraction, by repeated traffic
loads, or by a combination of these mechanisms. In addition, the temperature
dependent stiffness of the materials and flaws in the overlay (i.e. built-in cracks
during construction) as reported by Halim et al [2] can have an important effect.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 9/1/17 4:18 PM
ROMANIAN JOURNAL
OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
2. CRACK ACTIVITY
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Horizontal
LVDT
Vertical
LVDT
Stopper
Brass
Plate
Pavement
Crack
The work developed by Pais [3] reports the evaluation of the crack
activity before overlay on16 cracked cross sections of flexible pavements, with
500m long, in the Portuguese road network. 13 transversal cracks and 11
longitudinal cracks were analyzed. The typical crack activity for a longitudinal
crack is shown in Figure 2 while Figure 3 shows the typical crack activity for
transversal cracks. Horizontal positive values represent opening of the crack
while negative values represent crack closing.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Bituminous
Granular
Longitudinal Crack
4 145
Subgrade
4733
3557
2969
2 381
1793 1820
1792
1765
617
644
120 4
1 177
29 56
589 616
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 24 25 26 27 28
23
19 20 21 22
Figure 4. Finite element model to simulate the crack activity before overlay
It has been demonstrated by Pais [3] that the most important component
of the crack activity is the relative vertical displacement. This is because after an
overlay the horizontal displacements are reduced to extremely small values due
to the strength of the asphalt layers. Because it is difficult to measure stresses in
cracked pavements or overlays and it is relatively simple to measure crack
activity, a model was developed to evaluate to which extent the same basic
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
principles and models being developed for the determination of the stresses in
overlays could predict the vertical crack activity.
Using the 3D finite element model, the vertical crack activity before
overlay was calculated to fit in a statistical model and the Equation [1] was
obtained.
Table 1. Coefficients for the model to predict the vertical crack activity before
overlay
Coefficient a b c d e f
Value 11.773 -21.388 -52.893 -94.619 -16.418 1181.66
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
5265 5292
4677 4704
Overlay 4089
3501
2913
4116
3528
2940
Granular 1737
1764
1149 1176
1793
1820
561 588
281
4705 1205 4732
1232 4144
4117 3556
3529 2968
2941
141 2380
2353
1792
1765
617 57
644
1204
1177
29 56
589 616
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1718 24 25 26 27 28
23
19 20 21 22
Using the 3D finite element model, the vertical crack activity after overlay
(VCAAO) was calculated to fit in a statistical model given by Equation 2.
where:
6
a a1i * ln X i a2 i (3)
i 1
6
b b1i * ln X i b2 i (4)
i 1
Table 2. Statistical coefficients for vertical crack activity after overlay model
i Xi a1i a2i b1i b2i
1 Cracked thickness (m) -1.190E-01 -1.286E+00 6.065E-02 -8.820E-01
2 Granular thickness (m) 4.940E-01 -3.279E+00 4.751E-03 2.967E-01
3 Overlay modulus (MPa) -2.885E-01 2.945E+00 -8.227E-03 1.457E+00
4 Cracked modulus (MPa) 1.734E-01 -6.342E-01 -1.826E-01 3.036E+00
5 Granular modulus (MPa) -9.188E-03 6.512E-01 -1.051E-01 1.465E+00
6 Subgrade modulus (MPa) -5.246E-01 4.856E+00 3.770E-02 9.037E-01
The crack activity after overlay can be used to evaluate the reflective
cracking fatigue life of the overlay by applying those movements to the asphalt
mixture simulating the pavement overlay. Sousa et al [4] developed a Reflective
Cracking Device (RCD) represented in Figure 8 which fit a cylindrical or
rectangular specimen to be subject to vertical and horizontal movements
representing the crack activity after overlay.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Vertical actuator
Horizontal
actuator
Specimen
The RCD represents the crack zone of the pavement overlay (Figure 9)
that is subjected to the horizontal and vertical movements which leads to the
cracking propagation from the old pavement to the new pavement layers.
Overlay layer
Specimen
Cracked Cracked
layer layer
Crack
F
S L. H (5)
w
where S = equivalent stiffness in crack zone;
F = measured force;
= applied displacement;
L = crack length (i.e. specimen length);
H = specimen height;
w = crack width.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
The AASHTO TP8-94 standard test defines the fatigue life for flexural
beam specimens when the specimen stiffness is reduced to 50% of the initial
stiffness. For this study, the fatigue life can be defined as the number of load
cycles to reach 50% of the initial equivalent stiffness in crack zone.
A reflective cracking fatigue model can be established using a linear
regression between logarithm of fatigue life, log N, and the logarithm of
displacement, log , defined as follows:
b
1
N a
(6)
where N = fatigue life;
= crack activity after overlay;
a, b = experimentally determined coefficients.
Using the equivalent stiffness in the crack zone to analyze the reflective
cracking, two types of stiffness evolution can be found during the test. The most
usual stiffness evolution found in these tests was the logarithmic law (Figure 10)
but in some tests an exponential law (Figure 11) was found.
38000
Equivalent Stiffness in
36000
crack zone (kPa)
34000
32000
30000
28000
26000
24000
22000
20000
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Cycles
Figure 10. Logarithmic evolution of equivalent stiffness in crack zone
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
14000
Equivalent Stiffness in
13000
crack zone (kPa)
12000
11000
10000
9000
8000
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Cycles
Figure 11. Exponential evolution of equivalent stiffness in crack zone
100000
Fatigue life (cycles)
6 cm
10000
5 cm
1000
100
0.1 1
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
1
VM
2
1 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 (7)
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
The statistical model developed for the Von Mises strain can predict the
values calculated using the 3D FEM as can be observed in Figure 14, where the
residual (difference between the strain calculated using the FEM and the
predicted by the statistical model) is relatively small for all results.
20
15
10
(FEM - Model) / FEM
5
Residual (%)
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Figure 14. Difference between FEM values and statistical values (residual) for
Von Mises strain
The use of the Von Mises strain in the design of pavement overlays can
be done by two different approaches. In the first approach, the RCD can be used
by applying a vertical displacement to the specimen which corresponds to the
Von Mises strain for the overlay thickness to be studied. In the second approach,
the Von Mises strain can be applied in a typical flexural fatigue test in which the
tensile strain applied to the beam is given by:
VM 1 1 (11)
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
The adopted mesh was designed also for study of the reflective cracking
phenomenon due to the traffic loading and represents an existing pavement,
where a crack is simulated through an element with zero-stiffness, and a layer on
top of the existing pavement representing an overlay. This mesh was described
in other works by Minhoto et al [8] and [9].
The finite element model used in numerical thermal analysis was
performed using a general finite elements analysis source code, ANSYS 7.0.
This analysis is a 3-D transient analysis, using a standard finite element
discretization, in space. In the design of the thermal finite-element mesh, the
compatibility of mesh with other mechanical models was observed.
The designed mesh has 13538 elements. For three-dimensional thermal
analysis, 3-D solid element, SOLID70, was used. This element, applicable to a
three-dimensional transient thermal analysis, has capability for three-
dimensional thermal conduction, according with previous explanation. The
element has eight nodes with a single degree of freedom, defined as temperature,
at each node.
The thermal properties of pavement material, such as thermal
conductivity, specific heat and density, for each pavement layer, were defined in
the “material properties” of this element, when the model was developed.
The main goal of this study is to show the good accuracy temperature
prediction that can be obtained with the model when compared to the field
pavement thermal condition.
Firstly, a FEM numerical analysis for the temperature distribution in a
pavement of a trial section was performed for the weather conditions (air
temperature, solar radiation and wind speed) during one year [7]. The model
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
30
28 0.125 m
Calculated
26 Observed
24
Temperature (ºC)
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hours
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
60
0.125 m
50
Pavement temperature (ºC)
40
30
20
10
-10
04 04 -0
4
r-0
4
-0
4 04 -0
4 04 04 -0
4
-0
4
-0
4
a n- e b- ar p ay un- ul u g- e p- ct ov ec
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Month
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
0.0005
0.00045
0.0004
0.00035
0.0003
Traffic+T.V.
eVM
0.00025 Traffic(130KN)
Temp. Var.
0.0002
0.00015
0.0001
0.00005
0
2-Mar
13-Mar
23-Mar
4-Mai
14-Mai
24-Mai
5-Jul
15-Jul
26-Jul
31-Dez
6-Nov
17-Nov
27-Nov
7-Dez
18-Dez
28-Dez
5-Set
15-Set
26-Set
6-Out
17-Out
27-Out
10-Jan
21-Jan
31-Jan
4-Jun
14-Jun
24-Jun
5-Ago
15-Ago
26-Ago
2-Abr
13-Abr
23-Abr
11-Fev
21-Fev
hours
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
45000000
40000000
.
35000000
Hourly predicted pavement life
30000000
25000000
Traffic+T.V.
Traffic(130KN)
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
10-Jan
21-Jan
31-Jan
2-Jun
12-Jun
22-Jun
2-Mar
12-Mar
22-Mar
2-Mai
12-Mai
23-Mai
3-Jul
13-Jul
23-Jul
31-Dez
10-Fev
20-Fev
3-Nov
13-Nov
23-Nov
3-Dez
14-Dez
24-Dez
2-Set
12-Set
23-Set
3-Out
13-Out
23-Out
2-Ago
13-Ago
23-Ago
1-Abr
12-Abr
22-Abr
hours
5. MULTI-CRACKS MODELING
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
through the new overlay. The models used only considered the traffic influence
simulating mode I and II of crack opening by applying the load above the crack
and adjacent to the crack.
Since then, the numerical modeling has been used in the assessment of
reflective cracking by different methods. Paulino et al [13] applied a cohesive
zone fracture model to simulate crack initiation and propagation in asphalt
concrete using intrinsic constitutive laws to connect traditional finite elements to
simulate localized damage and softening behavior. Nesnas and Nunn [14] used a
finite element model with multi-cracks to investigate the top-down cracking in
cement treated base pavements.
More recently, Wu and Harvey [15] developed a finite element model to
evaluate the performance of several asphalt mixes that contain binders with
recycled rubber. The mechanistic model was based on non-local continuum
damage mechanics and the finite element method and the damage evolution law
parameters were identified using laboratory fatigue test data. The finite element
model was the first model used in the reflective cracking analysis that was
created with multiple cracks, simulating the alligator cracking in the existing
pavements before the placement of a pavement overlay.
However, these studies did not investigate the influence of the existence
of multiple cracks or the influence of the spacing between cracks in the
evaluation of the reflective cracking. This subject takes a significant importance
because cracked pavements, mainly the flexible pavements, usually present
multiple cracks (alligator cracks) before the pavement overlaying.
Thus, this paper aims to study the influence of the existence of multiple
cracks in finite element models on reflective cracking. This influence is assessed
by the state of stress and strain in the pavement overlay, just above the existing
cracks in the old pavement.
This effort consisted of developing a 2D finite element model which was
created, using the plain strain mode, in which 10 cracks were modeled in the
cracked layer and spaced 10 cm from each other. The model has the ability to
easily change the crack spacing, the elimination of some cracks to create any
configuration of cracking with any cracking spacing, from a pavement with only
one crack to a pavement up to 10 cracks.
The application of this model resulted in creating different cracking
configurations to study the influence of crack spacing on the reflective cracking
phenomenon. The study investigated three different overlay configurations: 10,
20 and 30 cm overlay thicknesses over an existing cracked pavement.
Pais et al [16] developed a 2D finite elements model to study the presence
of multi-cracks in the reflective cracking behavior. The model has a pavement
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
One of the objectives of this work was to evaluate the difference between
modeling of multiples cracks as compared to a single crack. This can be
observed by the representation of the Von Mises strain presented in Figure 22
and 23, respectively for a pavement with only one crack modeled and the
pavement with 10 cm spaced cracks. The analysis of these figures shows the
difference between the state of strain in the overlay associated with the presence
of either a single or multiple cracks. The difference is also visible in the state of
strain above the existing cracks which is responsible for the reflective cracking.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Figure 22. Von Mises strain in a pavement with a single crack (#3)
The first analysis of this study of carried out for the cases of single cracks.
For these cases, the strain level in the pavement with 10 cm thickness overlay is
indicated in Figure 24, where Ex represents the horizontal strain, Ey represents
the vertical strain, Exy represents the shear strain and the Evm represents the
Von Mises shear strain. The analysis of single crack modeling indicates that the
vertical strain is almost constant when cracks below the load (1, 2 and 3) are
modeled. Also, for the other cracks, the vertical strain is constant. In terms of
horizontal, shear and Von Mises strain, they increase as the cracks moves away
from the load but after crack 4 the strain level reduces significantly, except for
the horizontal strain. This analysis shows that when only one crack is modeled,
that should be the crack 4, which is 10 cm away from the load. Usually, the
modeling of a single crack simulating the mode II of crack opening is simulated
by crack 3, which is around 20% less them the strain level above crack 4.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Figure 24. Strain in the overlay for models with only one crack
Figure 25. Influence of overlay thickness of Von Mises strain for single crack
The analysis of 10 cm spaced cracks (Figure 26) shows that, for this crack
spacing, the consideration of multiple cracks is unfavorable, i.e, produces von
Mises strains lesser that the one obtained when only one crack is modeled.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
Figure 26. Influence of overlay thickness of Von Mises strain for 10cm crack spacing
Figure 27. Von Mises strain in the overlay for 50 cm crack spacing
6. CONCLUSIONS
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements
[3] J. PAIS, “The reflective cracking in flexible pavement overlay design (in
Portuguese)”, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Minho, Portugal, 1999.
Jorge Pais,
The reflective cracking in flexible pavements