Animation

http://anm.sagepub.com/

Concrete Animation
George Griffin
Animation 2007 2: 259
DOI: 10.1177/1746847707083421

The online version of this article can be found at:

http://anm.sagepub.com/content/2/3/259

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

Additional services and information for Animation can be found at:

Email Alerts: http://anm.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts

Subscriptions: http://anm.sagepub.com/subscriptions

Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav

Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

Citations: http://anm.sagepub.com/content/2/3/259.refs.html

>> Version of Record - Oct 15, 2007

What is This?

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 interstices

Concrete Animation

George Griffin

Abstract This article was originally delivered as an illustrated

lecture at the 2007 ‘Pervasive Animation’ symposium at Tate
Modern, London, 2–4 March 2007. My goal was to describe a
category of animation practice emerging today and to compare
its various tendencies with my experience making films, books,
and installations. I have attempted to balance my personal art
history with an analysis of larger issues in animation. ‘Concrete
animation’ refers to work that focuses primarily on materiality
and process. It has a precedence in contemporary art practice; it
has one foot in the distant, pre-cinema past, and one foot on a
path leading to a future of digital and manual animation.

Keywords animation, cel animation, concrete, flipbook, film

installation, kinetic art, material, mutoscope, object animation,
process, self-referential, sculpture, traditional animation

The transitive verb to draw means ‘to trace (a line or figure) by drawing a
pencil, pen, or the like, across a surface; to cut (a furrow) by drawing a
ploughshare through the soil’. (Oxford English Dictionary, 1971)

I began drawing as a child and, with encouragement from my archi-

tect father and school mates, never stopped. But by my early 20s I
became impatient when someone lingered too long on one drawing
or overlooked another. The solution was to control the staging and
tempo of presentation, to add motion, ‘to put on a show’. Forty years
later, I’m still learning how much animation is like drawing, in that
original muscular connotation, not just making marks on paper but,
more profoundly, as an active process of organization, furrowing,

animation: an interdisciplinary journal (http://anm.sagepub.com)

Copyright © 2007 SAGE (London, Los Angeles, New Delhi and Singapore)
Vol 2(3): 259–274 [1746-8477(200711)]10.1177/1746847707083421

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

260 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

movement through time. And I’m still in awe of animation’s mysteri-

ous paradox of vision, that what you see (a sequence of static images)
is not what you get (movement). Nowhere is this paradox more
apparent than in concrete animation (Figure 1), a term I hope to
reinvent or at least reclaim from prior usage.
Concrete was a term used by William Moritz (1978) and others as
a synonym for abstract or absolute animation, perhaps in reference to
the planar abstractions of de Stijl: Theo von Doesburg and Piet
Mondrian. Concrete also applies to poets like Emmett Williams who
arranged words and type into rebuses and patterns, and to musicians
like Pierre Boulez who used tape recording and radio to create
collaged compositions of ‘real world’ sounds. In each case there was
a radical commitment to eliminate the conventional accretions of
ornament and narrative. Today the term contains a tone of defiant
backlash against the pervasive reach of digital processing and its
tendency toward virtual reality.
I propose to link concrete to actual materials, objects not just
images, and the processes which cause them to spring to life. It is not
tied to any particular rules of design or vanguard art theory. It suggests
the tactile, the tangible, the real, the stuff which is often forgotten in
the river of illusion. Just as concrete, used in building construction, is
formed by the coalescence of discrete particles into a solid mass, so
too is animation more than the sum of its parts, be they frames on a
strip of film, pages in a book, or a sequence of objects.
There is a particularity associated with concrete things as opposed
to the general, the abstract, or the idealized. A brush stroke, a paper
texture, a smeared pencil mark – all are evidence of human intelligence
and labor. And while modern art criticism has on occasion railed
against these idiosyncrasies to glorify an impersonal art of or for ‘the
people’ or to mock the concept of the genius-made masterpiece, the
pendulum of opinion then swings back to contradictory fashions: bad

Figure 1
Concrete Animation. Image courtesy of
the author. © George Griffin.

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 261

art becomes the rage. Animation production, so dependent on techno-

logical development, hasn’t been so flexible. Thus, when it became
possible to produce a Disneyesque entertainment of impossibly
perfect puppets there was no need to have a political or aesthetic
debate; it was considered ineluctable. And even now that this mode
of idealized animation is being tempered by algorithms for abraded
textures and random furriness, and captured, rather than invented,
motion, it still seems pertinent to ask what has been lost. And to under-
stand the attraction of real stuff.
The stormy marriage of animation and cinema is either on the rocks,
or destined to being redefined well beyond recognition. A live action
feature that doesn’t depend on frame by frame technology might now
be considered traditional cinema. Both the end of animation history
(Langer, 2002) and the end of film cinema as we know it is drawing
nigh; the computer makes animation production both more complex
and childishly, fiendishly easy, while plasma screens flatten the earth
into an audience of consumers, pedestrians, or believers. When
anyone can become an animator by simply defining two key frames,
it’s clear that animation will be made by artists who do not regard
themselves as animators but simply as artists currently working with
animation to achieve other goals.1

Definition/anti-definition

As a practicing animator, I am reluctant to exclude anything from the

eclectic mix of my creative kitchen: tools, material, attitude. But this
omnivorous approach can be frustrating for anyone hoping to create
a succinct, logical, limited definition of concrete animation. For it to be
a useful term it must conform to the experience of the work as it is.
Here is a preliminary list of what I don’t mean by concrete animation:
1 Traditional animation, an offensive epithet designed to marginalize
any animator who doesn’t work in CGI (computer-generated
imagery). It defies definition, yet limits and downsizes the art,
even if some artists accept it as a badge of honor.
2 2D animation, a risible over-simplification, implying an absence of
one or more dimensions, as if the issue were an appalling
oversight rather than a stimulating subject of investigation by
artists since the Renaissance.
3 Hand-drawn animation, a trusted method of preserving the
subtleties of an artist’s idiosyncratic markings. This is only one of
many possible techniques used in concrete animation which
refuses to be defined by a technique.2
4 Cel animation, which organizes the fruits of #3 into systematic
sequencing and layering even if the eponymous celluloid isn’t in
use.3

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

262 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

Nor do I mean a knee-jerk Luddism advocating abandonment or

destruction of computers which have become essential to the produc-
tion process. I and most other animators draw, paint, composite, and
edit digitally. The alienating division of labor of the studio can be
avoided and all creative choices concentrated at one location for one
author. This supposed good thing does come with physical blowback:
eye strain, repetitive stress syndrome, sedentarianism, and the inability
to experiment freely due to the computer’s systematic logics, its clean-
liness, its lack of noise, its lack of messy provocative materiality, its
reluctance to subvert protocol.
Concrete animation is not a rigorous category in a general theory;
I am not a ‘Concretist’ out to promote ‘Concretism’. Sharp lines drawn
in the sand dissolve with time. I think of it as a cleansing flavor to clear
the visual palate, as a tendency to remain honest to the original
thought/gesture, to let a drawing look like a drawing, not a sparkling
confection. It can provide a context for certain kinds of projections
that seem both sculptural and graphic, like Anthony McCall’s solid
light film installations from the 1970s (now being reinvented through
digital animation and projection) where viewers could experience the
conical beam of the projector light instead of, or in addition to, the
linear image flickering on the screen.
Concrete animation is experiential and pervasive; it may take many
forms and exist in a wide range of sites. Taking into account a broad
historical view of animation, concrete animation is to be found in the
following forms:
1 Self-referential animation: films whose subject is dominated by
material and process. These formal considerations don’t
necessarily affect a work’s content. But when Virgil Widrich (Fast
Film, 2003) animated color photocopies of classic Hollywood films
by treating each frame as a material object (cutting, tearing,
crushing, folding with loony abandon), an older medium (printed
paper) was indeed subverting and re-asserting dominion over the
cinematographic conventions of the Hollywood narrative.
2 Animation installed in a non-theatrical venue: in a gallery or other
public, non-sedentary or unexpected space; projected onto or
within sculptural objects, during live performance, onto irregular,
exterior facades, from moving vehicles, into a single-viewer
peepshow, etc.4 The end result of such display is that animated
light becomes a creative agent in redefining space.
3 Object animation which displays physical moving objects arrested
in synthetic time by strobe light or shuttering devices (both low
and high tech). This could be considered the intermittent
equivalent of the pinhole camera.
4 Flipbooks and other manual devices for rapid image display.

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 263

Animation art/animation craft

When I began to make films, I felt liberated from the burden of art
history and the art market, which reeked of business, hype, and
fashion. Film was democratic and still retained a radical political aura
from the early days of Soviet cinema up to the authenticity of under-
ground movies. But I was confusing production with distribution,
which still required that artists submit to the Hollywood commodity
model. My films, no matter how amateurish, hand-crafted, or personal,
were nevertheless categorized as non-sponsored ‘short subjects’ and
sold in the non-theatrical market alongside educational and self-
improvement films. And the vanguard idealists at the film co-ops didn’t
offer a significant market advantage beyond rhetoric.
My introduction to animation came in 1968 when I landed a job as
an apprentice in a commercial cartoon studio where I learned all the
specialized functions, short of shooting and animating. Those I took
up after hours at home where I built a small camera stand. I had already
shot hand-held experiments in the manner of Stan Brakhage. I also
greatly admired Yellow Submarine (George Dunning, 1968), but
didn’t know how to synthesize these sources. My experience in the
trenches drawing in-betweens imprinted my consciousness as an
artisan, deeply involved with tools and craft. But, alone with my flip-
books and Bolex, I felt the distinct lure toward wanton recklessness.
By 1972, I had become familiar with Godard’s reflections on ‘truth
@ 24 fps’, the ‘de-materialization of the art-object’, not to mention
process, minimalism, materialism: Richard Serra’s slabs of lead,
Gordon Matta-Clark’s houses sawed in half. Then I saw Dunning’s
brilliant Damon The Mower (1972), with its small sheets of unat-
tended drawings twitching on a wooden tabletop. Dunning resisted
the easy path of illustrating Andrew Marvell’s poem by separating the
poet’s words from the pictures: a delightful trick that mirrored the
camera’s self-conscious point of view. The big idea I took away was
the conceit of authorship, a subterranean tendency toward self-
reference found in all the pioneering animators, from J. Stuart Blackton
and Émile Cohl, to Winsor McCay and the Fleischers.
‘Trikfilm 3’ (Figure 2) is my re-working of the expanded point of
view. Pixilated hands appear to draw a flipbook on a memo pad even
as the images animate, a blatant impossibility, but not if the real hands
were also animated. Dunning had correctly guessed that the viewer
could process a stack of casually aligned drawings. I added an Inkwell
hand-in-the-frame as an anchor, though without a character gaining
liberation from its author. In fact it’s all about the process and has very
little in the way of humorous phases, unless you count the humping
skyscrapers.
I would be occupied with this form of self-reflexive animation for
the rest of the 1970s. This being the age of manifestos, I called the films
‘anti-cartoons’: the contrarian anti- to promote my counter-culture

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

264 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

Figure 2
Trikfilm 3, 1973, frame from 16mm film.
Image courtesy of the author.
© George Griffin.

world-view and the pejorative cartoon to signify a simplistic, shallow,

immature art. I hoped the terms would cancel each other to rescue
the C word from the grips of Disney’s infantilism and restore its
connection to drawing as such. More Saul Steinberg, less Norman
Rockwell.
My next films, Step Print and Block Print (1976 and 1977, respec-
tively), are my most radical (and least popular) films, designed for non-
theatrical presentation. Neither had a sound track, overt narrative
thread (other than a descriptive chronicle of the film’s production), or
any consciously expressed notion of drama. They are both flat proce-
durals, bordering on the grammar of a documentary instructional
program. And, in retrospect, I would call them more concrete than
anti-cartoon.

Block Print as book

Block Print devotes 17 minutes to the production of a mutoscopic

device whose whirling pages reconstitute a walk around a New York
City block, still in the throes of gritty urban blight. The subject was
shot in real time, then duplicated, repositioned, and sped up on an
optical printer, then duplicated on a microfilm printer, then cut up
frame by frame and assembled into a round book (Figure 3), then
finally animated page by page against the original sidewalk and build-
ings (Figure 4). The subject transforms from cityscape to a transform-
ation of linear space into sequential phases of time.
I was hoping in this flurry of mechanical reproduction to discover
some essential distinctions between cinema as document and anima-
tion as synthetic construction. Both the beginning and the ending have
fixed durations determined by the physical space travelled, while the
middle chapters briefly illustrate the gloomy tedium of industrial work
space. The labor of the worker at the microfilm service lab (loading

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 265

Figure 3
Block Print mutoscope, 1977. Image
courtesy of the author. © George
Griffin.

Figure 4
Block Print, 1977, frame from 16mm
film. Image courtesy of the author.
© George Griffin.

the roll of film and adjusting the settings of the electrostatic printer)
is complemented by the repetitive tasks of cutting and animating on
film performed by the animator/artisan.
The transformation through expansion and reduction of film frames

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

266 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

Figure 5
Head, 1975, frame from 16mm film.
Image courtesy of the author.
© George Griffin.

to paper pages allows the space on the city block to be bound into
the form of a round book, a cycle without end. Turning the cine frame
into a paper print opened up traditional tools of manipulation: cutting,
notching, folding, all quite tactile manipulations which I explore more
fully in Head (Figure 5, 1975) and Lineage (1979). The four Block
Print books, assembled from the mutoscope reel, now serve as
tangible evidence of the original walk.

Step Print as installation

With few exceptions (McCall, Paul Sharits) film was not accepted in
galleries in the 1970s because the film projector, unlike video, was a
complex, noisy contraption that needed constant attention. Motion
pictures were also considered a vulgar spectacle (‘If it moves, it’s not
for us,’ sniffed the New York Times art critic John Canaday about
Robert Breer’s films). But the main reason might have been purely
market-based: what was for sale? who would want to buy a reel of film
that had to be threaded and projected, and that would become brittle
and fade? And besides, it would be a copy, not a unique, signed object.
Non-profit venues like Artists Space, The Kitchen, and Franklin
Furnace sprang up as an alternative. Unlike the proscenium theatre, a
gallery space encourages an inquisitive mood. You are on the prowl,
actively browsing, grazing, a noble hunter–gatherer, not an optical
serf, suffering the whimsy of a tyrannical filmmaker.
Step Print (1976) was installed in two parts, a film loop projector
activated by the viewer with a foot switch (Figure 6) and a composite
‘quilt’ of sequence images rear-lit, as in the film, to emphasize their
luminance (Figure 7). One could either stop and play the film for any
length, or move into the secondary space to examine the drawings.
This primitive form of interactivity allows the viewer to discover the
performance rather than submitting to it.

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 267

Figure 6
Step Print installation photo-
illustration. Image courtesy of the
author. © George Griffin.

Figure 7
Step Print, 1976, frame from 16mm
film. Image courtesy of the author.
© George Griffin.

Drawing/film/collation

Step Print is divided into three chromatic chapters, each containing a

28-drawing cycle. The design is a simple step pattern found in abstract
weavings throughout the world. The colors were applied with markers
which bled through the paper, resulting in a double-sided, mirror-
imaged object.
Step Print follows rules, e.g. shooting the drawings at one unalter-
able tempo. But by treating the drawings as individual objects as well
as phases in sequence, I discovered varieties of permutation. The strat-
egies were very simple, as demonstrated: reversing orientation and
reversing sequence direction as single and as doubled layers.

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

268 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

The experience of animation shooting was illustrated by intercut

documentary shots, both live action and frame by frame, just as
contrived as McCay and Fleischer. Traditionally, shooting was the most
demanding, least creative stage of production. With Step Print the
shooting was numbingly methodical, but the random pixilation of
real hands provided a counterpoint to the systematic flow of
patterns.
Oskar Fischinger was the primary precedent for Step Print. During
his influential career, Fischinger gave us glorious color abstractions
tightly synchronized to music as well as silent visual equivalents to
music, and even experiments in concretizing sound by drawing optical
waveforms. I could have organized my experiments with the serial
music of Philip Glass or Steve Reich, but I felt the need to keep these
experiments provisional, more like chapters in a logbook. I wanted
viewers to feel they were simply observing a guy at work in his studio,
no more, and to realize that it’s often quite boring and absurd, but that
sometimes you hit an unexpected stroke, like a chord from Duke
Ellington, and out pops dancing linoleum! But the jazz is in your mind.
Just as Fischinger thought his later work should be experienced
independently from music to avoid becoming merely illustrative, I felt
that a gallery should be a neutral contemplative space, a kind of
sanctuary from aural intrusion and interpretation.

Animation as sculpture

Concrete animation is often to be found only as objects at specific

sites. Robert Breer’s kinetic sculpture (Figure 9) grew out of that
general category dominated by Alexander Calder and Jean Tinguely
to become more pointedly cinematic. There were two types: dome-
shaped ‘Floats’ of vastly different scale (9cm to 1.5m high) which
moved extremely slowly on the floor along an unpredictable path, and
hand-operated sequence devices which playfully parodied 19th-
century pre-cinema toys. The latter could be cranked like a mutoscope
or played by swiping one’s hand across cards mounted on the wall. As
the son of an automobile designer, Breer always hints at the possibility
of subversive humor inherent in engineering: cinema devolves to the
whims of the human wrist.
Another example, found only in the controlled darkened environ-
ment of a gallery, is the kinetic sculptures of Gregory Barsamian. They
are essentially large motor-driven zoetropes with looped cycles of
transforming objects instead of images, lit by a perfectly tuned strobe
which creates a shuttering effect to freeze the rotation movement and
animate real sculptural objects. The vision created in the blinking
darkness has a hair-raising, dangerous, preternatural quality, an effect
similar to Lumière’s train in its time. It not only appears to be real, it
is real, occupying real space, usually viewed in the round. Barsamian’s

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 269

Figure 8 Robert Breer, 2005: flipping wall-mounted sequence cards. Image

courtesy of the author. © George Griffin.

work must be roped off to prevent destruction of the device and injury
to viewers who might be tempted to reach out in the magical darkness
and touch it.
It is ironic that the most discussed piece in the 2006 Pixar exhibi-
tion at MoMA was an uncredited, unacknowledged appropriation of
Barsamian’s work featuring Buzz Lightyear and others. Having been
spoiled by the virtuosity of ever faster, more highly resolved and
exquisitely choreographed fantasies by cutting-edge digital produc-
tion, we stand mesmerized by whirling objects in real space trans-
formed to a performance in synthetic time. The perverse devolution
of puppetry from the hyperrealism of CGI to its root in stylized abstrac-
tion scored a delightful shock.
The zoetrope is also the essential engine of concrete animation in
Eric Dyer’s 2006 film Copenhagen Cycles, which is based on footage
shot in that city while riding a bicycle, then printed, collaged,
engineered into 25 revolving sculptures (which he calls ‘cinetropes’)
and re-filmed with a fast shutter DV camera. The hypnotic pacing of
multiple images blending fore and aft reflects the rhythmic flow of the
bicycle as the traditional definition of animation is stood on its ear to
produce a synthetic time-based work of great beauty. (This work was
shown as a three-screen installation with live feeds from the zoetropes
at the 2007 Platform Festival in Portland, Oregon.)

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

270 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

Perhaps the most venerable site specific contemporary zoetrope is

‘Masstransiscope’, Bill Brand’s 1980 installation in an abandoned
Brooklyn subway station: 228 panels of brightly lit, painted abstrac-
tions, 300 feet long, come to life as commuters gaze from the windows
of the express train [http://www.bboptics.com/masstransiscope.
html]. The streaking vision is intermittently subdivided into discrete
intervals by a black dividing wall with vertical 1/2” slits placed every
15”. Though it is now covered with graffiti, I hope that future projects
will be based on the graffiti itself.5
The concrete aspect of these works, so rooted in the tradition of
Emile Reynaud, Étienne-Jules Marey, and Eadweard Muybridge, using
both mechanical and digital technology, goes beyond merely revealing
material and process. By building complex environments and contrap-
tions which are unwieldy, clanky, and not easily portable, designed to
investigate the essential mechanisms of perception in motion, these
artists are becoming the architects of animation. Just as pilgrims in an
earlier age flocked to magnificent cathedrals to actively witness a
unique experience, we can expect to visit spaces of controlled inter-
mittent observation, where image and sculpture spring to life as we
physically move from position A to position B, through, along, over
and under animating demimondes of synthetic time.

Flipbook as sculpture

Predating the advent of mechanical gears and shutters is the intimate,

voyeuristic flipbook, which relies on a modicum of manual skill to
control the flow of data. Yet even if thumb-pressure cannot reproduce
a smooth playback, the staccato rhythms offer an optical and haptic
delight. The viewer becomes the engine of re-creation, inventing
moments that may never have existed.
Flipbooks can be unique experiments in form with a diversity of
page shapes and binding technologies; they can reveal sequence
imagery and text on one or both sides. Even though they carry a
populist legacy, they have migrated into the precious Artist Book
category, especially if signed in a limited edition. Robert Breer claims,
with an ironic twinkle, that his ‘Image Par Images’ published by
Galerie Denise René in 1955 for its seminal kinetic art show, ‘Le
Mouvement’, was the first fine arts flipbook.
What began as regression in the service of my inner-drawing-child
grew into an obsession with collecting, experimenting, publishing.
There was always a flipbook or some kind of printed matter relating
to each of my films.
The excellent Daumenkino exhibition organized in 2005 at Dussel-
dorf’s Kunsthalle by Christoph Schultz displayed a wide range of books
from anonymous advertisements to Gilbert and George. Improving on
the conventional museum vitrine presentation, visitors could play

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 271

many of the rare 19th-century books on MP4 players. Among the

contemporary installations was the work of a young Berliner, Volker
Gerling: photographic portrait flipbooks.
These books are carried by the artist, arranged on a peddler’s tray,
documenting intercity back-packing journeys, e.g. from Berlin to
Munich (hmmm, hints of young Fischinger). These Wanderschaften
lend a romantic, even spiritual, component which is heightened by
the artist’s self-imposed assumption of poverty: he trades the viewing
of his flipbooks for food, shelter, or small amounts of money. And as
the viewer holds and recreates the decisive moments when the pages
were recorded, Gerling relates the specific circumstances of that
moment. In each case the sequence is unrehearsed and fulfils the
directions of the subject. In one, a young woman with bountiful hair
looks quite vulnerable and depressed as she gazes into a mirror; the
pages go black as she closes her eyes; her eyes open onto her new
crew cut which she regards with evident delight. As an animator, I
found this sequence almost perverse in denying our surveillance of the
dramatic transformation. But, as Gerling tells us, she didn’t want to see
her haircut in action, so why should we? By suggesting a multiplicity
of narratives rather than demonstrating one obvious route, this decep-
tively honest and simple flipbook approaches the poetry of August
Sander. In addition, Gerling makes performances by flipping his pages
in front of a camera fed to a digital projector, while recounting his tales
of wandering and recording, with live music mixed into the back-
ground.
My most recent film (It Pains Me to Say This, 2006) is a 10-minute
cartoon dealing with language, politics, anger, self-deception, betrayal
– garden variety angst. It is not concerned with formal process, yet it
too has a concrete component: a flipbook, entitled MoveOn which
contains drawing, photography, and kinetic text, color Xerox on both
sides of synthetic, waterproof, supposedly indestructible paper. It is
bound by one centered post so there is no spine, and pages extend in
both directions, offering four sequences to view. This binding post
(the technical term is sex bolt) can be loosened to rotate each page to
alter the sequence order, melding the content into a range of flicker-
ing possibilities. It is the first flipbook I have made in a limited edition,
to be seen in a gallery, attached to the wall by a flexible gooseneck
(Figures 9 and 10).
I hoped the content – images of naked human bottoms rhythmically
swaying – would offer some erotic delight, and be a succès de
scandale. I used myself and my wife as cheap but willing models
(these were the bottoms on hand). To seriously investigate the poten-
tial for the erotic flipbook one would surely consider, as with any
book, the private, ruminative nature of reading. The solitary reader
isn’t disturbed by the reactions of a collective audience, perhaps snick-
ering as a nervous reaction, or defensive laughter. The reader can play
the book over and over, reversing or slowing down, stopping, or

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

272 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

Figure 9
MoveOn flipbook at Pratt Institute
Gallery, 2005. Image courtesy of the
author. © George Griffin.

Figure 10
MoveOn frame from digital video clip,
2007. Image courtesy of the author.
© George Griffin.

accelerating the action on demand [http://www.geogrif.com/moveon

comp.html].
The staccato flickering effects achieved by blending disparate
sequences has its roots in the optical experiments of Sharits and Tony
Conrad (and more recently, Jeffrey Scher) but I owe Breer even more.
His penchant for randomness, particularly in his insouciant shuffling
of sequence cards and stuttering mutoscopes of differing shaped
pages, has helped a generation of animators to free themselves from
the obligations of methodically smooth motion. He in turn acknowl-
edges Hans Arp who famously claimed that he happened on tactics of
chance by accidentally dropping cutouts on his studio floor in Zurich,
perhaps near the Café Voltaire, that well of Dada trickery.

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

 Griffin Concrete Animation 273

Touching objects

While creative disorder has been re-worked countless times, it is most

delicious when applied to the mechanical re-enactments of cinema.
The final precedent for concrete animation is Jan Švankmajer, the
master of animated transformation, who places into dreamy turmoil
objects we thought we knew well, material we use in everyday,
waking life, like food, furniture, toys, tools. Certainly not the first to
invest ordinary objects with animated life (for example, Segundo de
Chomón’s 1905 Electric Hotel), he nonetheless has advanced his vision
with such uncanny skill and deadpan darkness as to infuse his working
material with dramatic life. In Dimensions of a Dialogue (1982), for
example, two heads, composed initially in the manner of Arcimboldo
out of vegetables, communicate with each other through acts of
voracious cannibalism, each successive course reducing the other to
ever finer particles in an apt metaphor for linguistic aggression. In
addition to both short and feature films, Švankmajer has expanded this
Czech-inflected surrealism into the gallery setting. He sequesters small
sculptural objects in a black leather sack: one must muster courage to
reach in and fondle these pieces of varying weight, texture, and
surface quality. The effect takes on a visceral intensity, locking the
blind fondler into a conspiracy of the imagination
At present I am building a digital mutoscope, a hand-cranked device
which uses a computer and LCD screen to display animation at any
speed, forward or reverse. As with my earlier installations, the viewer
will be in control of initiating the movement, but now with the added
variables of speed and direction. It is housed in a box like a peepshow
so the experience will be private.
After 40 years of controlling the flow of pictures in time and space,
I have come to understand that the concrete stuff I use to put on a
show, whether it’s embedded in the film’s architecture, or grasped in
greedy, flipping, manipulating fingers – this stuff can also act as an
emergency exit to return some measure of freedom and control back
to the viewer.

Notes
1 While attending the Platform Animation Festival in Portland, Oregon, June
2007, I asked a panel of 15 artists who had created a wide variety of
animated film installations for the festival if they considered themselves
primarily ‘animators’. None did.
2 Just as experimental animation, if such a genre exists, cannot be defined by
techniques or aesthetics.
3 The use of acetate cel layering for frame by frame compositing
photographically onto motion picture film has virtually disappeared in
professional production studios.
4 Among the many artists who have turned to gallery installations in the last

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011

274 animation: an interdisciplinary journal 2(3)

decade, two offer a vivid contrast in self-referential process. William

Kentridge made his reputation by using direct manipulation of charcoal
drawings, a technique so primitive it calls to mind the lightning sketch artists
like J. Stuart Blackton. Referencing a later era of animation development is
Brent Green who sabotages the protocols of layered cel animation by treating
acetate and glass sheets as if they were candy wrappers, wrinkled, with
edges and flares, then shooting them with a hyperkinetic camera, often
including his rural Pennsylvania barn and trees in the background. In both
cases the funky smudges, pentimenti, and environmental noise left by the
artists’ hands are incorporated (concretely) into the total design experience.
5 The most recent application of the linear zoetrope is in the hands of Joshua
Spodek who approaches the process from a highly technical perspective
using slit-scans of commercial photography; the result appears to be heading
toward advertising [http://www.submediaworld.com/about.htm].

References
Daumenkino: The Flip Book Show (2005) Kunsthalle Düsseldorf, Snoeck Verlags-
gesellschaft GmbH, Cologne.
Langer, Mark (2002) ‘The End of Animation History’. URL: http://www.asifa.net
Moritz, William (1978) ‘Beyond “Abstract Criticism”’, Film Quarterly 31(3),
Spring.
Oxford English Dictionary (1971) Compact edition. New York: Oxford University
Press.

George Griffin grew up in Tennessee, studied political science at Dart-

mouth College, and has lived in New York City since 1967. He appren-
ticed in commercial cartoon studios, was influenced by Robert Breer
and Saul Steinberg, and made his first animation with improvised
equipment in 1969. His work includes self-referential cartoons, narra-
tives, documentaries, and experiments with music including Head,
Viewmaster, Ko-Ko, A Little Routine. He has published flipbooks,
written on animation, and taught animation studio courses at Harvard,
Pratt, and Parsons, amongst other places. A DVD, Griffiti Archive, is
available at www.geogrif.com [email: [email protected]].

Downloaded from anm.sagepub.com at Karlstad Universitet on December 14, 2011