RESEARCH Paper
RESEARCH Paper
Abstract
Introduction
Hypotheses
Conceptual Framework
School Administrators
Who have tirelessly endeavored to the school. This
study might add information about the impact of
internet dependency to academic performance and
might apply it to their lives and will benefit them
by knowing the limitations in terms of internet
dependency.
Parents
The parents of the grade 12 students will have an
advantage in this study because they can understand
and motivate their children to pursue their studies
despite the challenges they experience. Also, they
will be able to provide what their child needs in
terms of mental, physical and materials.
Future researchers
This study will be a useful reference for all the
future researchers who would plan to make a related
study. This will serve as their cross-reference that
will give them information and background.
Definition of Terms
Internet dependency: Internet dependency was measured
with the 20-item Young‟s Internet Addiction Test (IAT)
developed by Young (1998). IAT consisted of 20 questions
designed to identify people as mildly, moderately, and
severely addicted to the internet. It is scored on a 5
point rating scale from strongly agree to strongly
disagree. The total score range is from 20-100. Scores
≤49 are considered normal, 50-79 is considered
problematic, and 80-100 is considered as significantly
problematic. It is the independent variable of the study.
Local Literature/Studies
Foreign Literature/Studies
Chapter III
METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE
Research Methodology
Research Design
stratum
an = distribution of population
STEM
ABM
HUMSS
TVL
Table 1
ABM 40 12.048% 10
TVL 25 7.530% 6
Research Instrument
3. Standard Deviation
(Table 1)
50 – 79 Moderately Dependent
(Table 3)
Introduction
Discussion of Findings
a) Sex
b) Gadgets
c) Internet connectivity
d) Academic performance(grades)
Table 4.Results in the Profile of the Respondents in
terms of Sex.
Frequency Percentage R
a
n
k
47 58.75 1
33 41.25 2
80 100
Smartphone 77 96.25 1
Laptop 2 2.5 2
Ipad/Tablet 1 1.25 3
Total 80 100
Wi-Fi 58 72.5 1
Connection
Data 13 16.25 2
Connection
Both 9 11.25 3
Total 80 100
90-95 43 53.75 1
86-89 28 35.00 2
81-85 7 8.75 3
75-80 2 2.5 4
Total 80 100
2.
Wh
at
is A
th
FREQUENCY
W
e SD Le
M
le 1 2 3 4 5 vel
(Sta
ve (Av
nda
l era rd
of ge Dev
in We iati
on)
te igh
rn ted
et Me
de an)
pe
nd
N R S O A
en
cy
am
on
g
th
e
re
sp
on
de
nt
s?
1. 1 2 26 34 17 3. 0. 61
Ho 80 85
(M
w
(O od
of
FT er
te
EN at
n
) el
do
y
yo
De
u
pe
fi
nd
nd
en
th
t)
at
yo
u
st
ay
on
li
ne
lo
ng
er
th
an
yo
u
in
te
nd
ed
?
2. 4 12 39 21 4 3. 0. 50
Ho 11 90
(M
w
(S od
of
OM er
te
ET at
n
IM el
do
ES y
yo
) De
u
pe
ne
nd
gl
en
ec
t)
t
ho
us
eh
ol
d
ch
or
es
to
sp
en
d
mo
re
ti
me
on
li
ne
?
3. 28 10 20 15 7 2. 1. 41
Ho 54 37
(M
w
(S il
of
OM dl
te
ET y
n
IM De
do
ES pe
yo
) nd
u
en
pr
t)
ef
er
th
e
ex
ci
te
me
nt
of
th
e
In
te
rn
et
to
in
ti
ma
cy
wi
th
yo
ur
pa
rt
ne
r?
4. 8 14 39 17 2 2. 0. 46
Ho 89 94
(M
w
(S il
of
OM dl
te
ET y
n
IM De
do
ES pe
yo
) nd
u
en
fo
t)
rm
ne
w
re
la
ti
on
sh
ip
s
wi
th
fe
ll
ow
on
li
ne
us
er
s?
5. 2 12 37 23 6 3. 0. 52
Ho 24 89
(M
w
(S od
of
OM er
te
ET at
n
IM el
do
ES y
ot
) De
he
pe
rs
nd
in
en
yo
t)
ur
li
fe
co
mp
la
in
to
yo
u
ab
ou
t
th
e
am
ou
nt
of
ti
me
yo
u
sp
en
d
on
li
ne
?
6. 6 20 34 17 3 2. 0. 46
Ho 89 95
(M
w
(S il
of
OM dl
te
ET y
n
IM De
do
ES pe
yo
) nd
ur
en
gr
t)
ad
es
or
sc
ho
ol
wo
rk
su
ff
er
be
ca
us
e
of
th
e
am
ou
nt
of
ti
me
yo
u
sp
en
d
on
li
ne
?
7. 1 21 34 18 6 3. 0. 49
Ho 09 92 (M
w il
(S
of dl
OM
te y
ET
n De
IM
do pe
ES
yo nd
)
u en
ch t)
ec
k
yo
ur
em
ai
l
be
fo
re
so
me
th
in
g
el
se
th
at
yo
u
ne
ed
to
do
?
8. 6 14 35 18 7 3. 1. 49
Ho 08 03
(M
w
(S il
of
OM dl
te
ET y
n
IM De
do
ES pe
es
) nd
yo
en
ur
t)
ac
ad
em
ic
pe
rf
or
ma
nc
e
or
pr
od
uc
ti
vi
ty
su
ff
er
be
ca
us
e
of
th
e
In
te
rn
et
?
9. 8 21 30 19 2 2. 0. 45
Ho 83 99
(M
w
(S il
of
OM dl
te
ET y
n
IM De
do
ES pe
yo
) nd
u
en
be
t)
co
me
de
fe
ns
iv
e
or
se
cr
et
iv
e
wh
en
an
yo
ne
as
ks
yo
u
wh
at
yo
u
do
on
li
ne
?
10 3 14 41 15 7 3. 0. 50
. 11 93
(M
Ho
(S od
w
OM er
of
ET at
te
IM el
n
ES y
do
) De
yo
pe
u
nd
bl
en
oc t)
k
ou
t
di
st
ur
bi
ng
th
ou
gh
ts
ab
ou
t
yo
ur
li
fe
wi
th
so
ot
hi
ng
th
ou
gh
ts
of
th
e
In
te
rn
et
?
11 2 15 42 18 3 3. 0. 49
. 06 82
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do
) nd
yo
en
u
t)
fi
nd
yo
ur
se
lf
an
ti
ci
pa
ti
ng
wh
en
yo
u
wi
ll
go
on
li
ne
ag
ai
n?
12 8 11 36 16 9 3. 1. 49
. 09 09
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do
) nd
yo
en
u
t)
fe
ar
th
at
li
fe
wi
th
ou
t
th
e
In
te
rn
et
wo
ul
d
be
bo
ri
ng
,
em
pt
y,
an
d
jo
yl
es
s?
13 13 19 23 19 6 2. 1. 45
. 83 19
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do
) nd
yo
en
u
t)
sn
ap
,
ye
ll
,
or
ac
t
an
no
ye
d
if
so
me
on
e
bo
th
er
s
yo
u
wh
il
e
yo
u
ar
e
on
li
ne
?
14 2 12 28 27 11 3. 0. 55
. 41 99
(M
Ho
(S od
w
OM er
of
ET at
te
IM el
n
ES y
do
) De
yo
pe
u
nd
lo
en
se
t)
sl
ee
p
du
e
to
be
in
g
on
li
ne
?
15 9 18 28 22 3 2. 1. 46
. 90 05
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do ) nd
yo en
u t)
fe
el
pr
eo
cc
up
ie
d
wi
th
th
e
In
te
rn
et
wh
en
of
f-
li
ne
,
or
fa
nt
as
iz
e
ab
ou
t
be
in
g
on
li
ne
?
16 1 11 37 16 15 3. 0. 55
. 14 99
(M
Ho
(S od
w
OM er
of
ET at
te
IM el
n
ES y
do
) De
yo
pe
u
nd
fi
en
nd
t)
yo
ur
se
lf
sa
yi
ng
"j
us
t
a
fe
w
mo
re
mi
nu
te
s"
wh
en
on
li
ne
?
17 3 14 31 19 13 3. 1. 53
. 31 06
(M
Ho
(S od
w
OM er
of
ET at
te
IM el
n
ES y
do
) De
yo
pe
u
nd
tr
en
y
t)
to
cu
t
do
wn
th
e
am
ou
nt
of
ti
me
yo
u
sp
en
d
on
li
ne
an
d
fa
il
?
18 8 10 31 23 8 3. 1. 51
. 16 10
(M
Ho
(S od
w
OM er
of
ET at
te
IM el
n
ES y
do
) De
yo
pe
u
nd
tr
en
y
to t)
hi
de
ho
w
lo
ng
yo
u'
ve
be
en
on
li
ne
?
19 4 19 35 15 7 3. 0. 48
. 03 99
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do
) nd
yo
en
u
t)
ch
oo
se
to
sp
en
d
mo
re
ti
me
on
li
ne
ov
er
go
in
g
ou
t
wi
th
ot
he
rs
?
20 11 17 28 18 6 2. 1. 46
. 89 14
(M
Ho
(S il
w
OM dl
of
ET y
te
IM De
n
ES pe
do
) nd
yo
en
u
t)
fe
el
de
pr
es
se
d,
mo
od
y,
or
ne
rv
ou
s
wh
en
yo
u
ar
e
of
f-
li
ne
,
wh
ic
h
go
es
aw
ay
on
ce
yo
u
ar
e
ba
ck
on
li
ne
?
FREQUENCY
The
Pos
Inte
Weig Stan Desc
iti rpre
hted dard ript
ve tati
5 4 3 2 1 Mean ive
Eff Devi on
Rati
ect atio ng
s n
of
Int
ern
et
Dep
end
enc
y
to
the
Aca
dem
ic
Per
for
man
ce
TOT
AL
Grand Weighted Mean: 3.7 SCO Eff Sig
4 RE ect nif
GE nt
The FREQUENCY
Neg
ati
ve Weig Stan Desc Inte
Eff hted dard ript rpre
ect 5 4 3 2 1 Mean ive tati
Devi Rati on
s
atio ng
of
n
Int
ern
et
Dep
end
enc
y
to
the
Aca
dem
ic
Per
for
man
ce
Effects of
Internet
Dependency on
the Academic
Performance
Mean Descriptive Interpretatio
Rating n
Chapter V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
● Sex
● Gadgets
● Internet connectivity
● Academic performance (Grades)
Conclusions
Recommendations
List of Tables
Table Page
1 Results on the
profile of the
respondents in
terms of
sex...............
..................
..........
2. Results on the
profile of the
respondents in
terms of gadgets
used to browse the
Internet..........
..................
..........
3. Results on the
profile of the
respondents in
terms of Internet
connectivity......
..................
..........
4. Results on the
profile of the
respondents in
terms of academic
performance
(grades)..........
..................
..........
5 Results on the
Internet
dependency level
of the
respondents.......
..................
..........
6 Results on the
Positive Effects
of Internet
Dependency to the
Academic
Performance of
students..........
..................
...........
7 Results on the
Negative Effects
of Internet
Dependency to the
Academic
Performance of
students..........
..................
...........
8 The Summary of the
Positive and
Negative Effects
of Internet
Dependency to the
Academic
Performance of the
students..........
..................
...........
REFERENCES