The document summarizes research on ReCell therapy compared to traditional skin grafting. It finds that ReCell decreases donor grafting site requirements and scarring for both trauma and donor sites. It also reduces recovery time and costs associated with multiple grafting procedures. ReCell has been shown to allow burns to heal faster and better with less pain compared to normal skin grafts. The creation of ReCell was originally intended for burn victims but has shown promise in treating vitiligo.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views1 page
Ysu Nurs 3749 Poster - Recell
The document summarizes research on ReCell therapy compared to traditional skin grafting. It finds that ReCell decreases donor grafting site requirements and scarring for both trauma and donor sites. It also reduces recovery time and costs associated with multiple grafting procedures. ReCell has been shown to allow burns to heal faster and better with less pain compared to normal skin grafts. The creation of ReCell was originally intended for burn victims but has shown promise in treating vitiligo.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
The Innovations of Skin Grafting Through ReCell
Conor Crogan, Whiley Drymon, Sterling Roberts, Paris Bumgardner
Introduction Research Question Conclusion
It takes a special healthcare provider to “For patients with impaired skin integrity, Recell has been shown to decrease care for intense burn injuries. Burns are how does ReCell therapy compare to donor grafting site requirements, scarring complicated and painful for the patient, so traditional skin grafting for skin repair in relation to scar development and for both trauma site and donor site, they need special care. Most burn recovery time, and cost associated with patients undergo the standard split thickness requirement of graft site?” multiple grafting procedures traditionally graft with requires a large donor site creating a secondary wound to treat. needed in the past. These benefits are With ReCell Therapy, we will need a much approved for burn patients but show smaller donor site, quicker recovery time, promise in the aid of care in almost all and less scaring compared to normal grafts. impaired skin integrity surgical interventions. As more clinical trials are done, it can increase the list of uses of ReCell therapy in the future.
Summary of Research Findings
Nursing Significance References • Burns have been shown to heal faster, better, and with less pain when using Scan for references ReCell therapy for these injuries instead of normal skin grafts • The graft/harvest site is much smaller for ReCell treatment when compared to traditional skin grafts. The creation of ReCell was originally intended • ReCell has been shown as effective for burn victims but has shown promise in treatment for vitiligo and is more treating vitiligo. When treated, the patients on effective than previous treatment options average saw at least 90% of regimentation of the affected area. Even the NAC was shown to have at least 90% re-pigmentation despite its lack of hair follicles making it more difficult to treat
Bitonte College of Health and Human Services Centofanti School of Nursing