CV 1
CV 1
Assignment
(Cyclic voltammetry)
AIM :
Record the CV of aqueous solution of sulphuric acid (0.5 M) at Pt
electrode as working electrode and counter electrode.
(a) Interpret and explain various peaks and regions of the CV and
their significance.
(b) Determine the area and roughness factor of the electrode by H-
adsorption and H- desorption.
(c) Determine the area and roughness factor of the electrode by Pt
oxide region.
THEORY :
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is a powerful and popular electrochemical
technique commonly employed to investigate the reduction and
oxidation processes of molecular species. CV is also invaluable to
study electron transfer-initiated chemical reactions, which
includes catalysis. As inorganic chemists embrace
electrochemistry, papers in the literature often contain figures like
Figure 1.
The traces in Figure 1 are called voltammograms or cyclic
voltammograms. The x-axis represents a parameter that is
imposed on the system, here the applied potential (E), while the
y-axis is the response, here the resulting current (i) passed.
The current axis is sometimes not labeled (instead a scale bar is
inset to the graph).
Understanding the “Duck” Shape: Introduction to the
Nernst Equation :
Why are there peaks in a cyclic voltammogram? Consider the
equilibrium between metal ion (M+) and metal(M).
This equilibrium is described by the Nernst equation .
The Nernst equation relates the potential of an electrochemical cell
(E) to the standard potential of a species (E0) and the relative
activities16 of the oxidized (Ox) and reduced (Red) analyte in the
system at equilibrium. In the equation, F is Faraday’s constant,
R is the universal gas constant, n is the number of electrons, and T
is the temperature
In application of the Nernst Equation to the one-electron
reduction of M+ to M, the activities are replaced with their
concentrations, which are more experimentally accessible, the
standard potential E0 is replaced with the formal potential E0′,
and n is set equal to 1:
The formal potential is specific to the experimental conditions
employed and is often estimated with the experimentally
determined E1/2 value .The Nernst equation provides a powerful way
to predict how a system will respond to a change of concentration
of species in solution or a change in the electrode potential.
To illustrate, if a potential of E = E°′ ≈ E1/2 is applied to our
example M+ solution, the Nernst equation predicts that M+ will
be reduced to M until [M+] = [M], and equilibrium is achieved.
Alternatively, when the potential is scanned during the CV
experiment,the concentration of the species in solution near the
electrode changes over time in accordance with the Nernst
equation.
When a solution of M+ is scanned to negative potentials, M+
is reduced to M locally at the electrode, resulting in the
measurement of a current and depletion of M+ at the electrode
surface. The resulting cyclic voltammogram is presented in
Figure 2 as well as the concentration−distance profiles for M+
(blue) and M (green) at different points in the voltammogram.
Crucially, the concentrations of M+ vs M relative to the distance
from the surface of the electrode are dependent on the potential
applied and how species move between the surface of the
electrode and the bulk solution (see below). These factors all
contribute to the “duck”-shaped voltammograms.
As the potential is scanned negatively (cathodically) from
point A to point D (Figure 2), [M+] is steadily depleted near the
electrode as it is reduced to M. At point C, where the peak
cathodic current (ip,c) is observed, the current is dictated by the
delivery of additional M+ via diffusion from the bulk solution.
The volume of solution at the surface of the electrode containing
the reduced M, called the diffusion layer, continues to grow
throughout the scan. This slows down mass transport of M+ to the
electrode. Thus, upon scanning to more negative potentials, the
rate of diffusion of M+ from the bulk solution to the electrode
surface becomes slower, resulting in a decrease in the current as
the scan continues (C → D). When the switching potential (D)
is reached, the scan direction is reversed, and the potential
is scanned in the positive (anodic) direction. While the
concentration of M+ at the electrode surface was depleted, the
concentration of M at the electrode surface increased, satisfying
the Nernst equation. The M present at the electrode surface is
oxidized back to M+ as the applied potential becomes more
positive. At points B and E, the concentrations of M+ and M at
the electrode surface are equal, following the Nernst equation,
E = E1/2. This corresponds to the halfway potential between the
two observed peaks (C and F) and provides a straightforward
way to estimate the E0′ for a reversible electron transfer, as noted
above. The two peaks are separated due to the diffusion of the
analyte to and from the electrode.
If the reduction process is chemically and electrochemically
reversible, the difference between the anodic and cathodic peak
potentials, called peak-to-peak separation (ΔEp), is 57 mV at
25 °C (2.22 RT/F), and the width at half max on the forward scan
The peak is 59 mV. Chemical reversibility is used to denote
whether the analyte is stable upon reduction and can subsequently
be reoxidized. Analytes that react in homogeneous
chemical processes upon reduction (such as ligand loss or
degradation) are not chemically reversible (see discussion below
on EC Coupled Reactions). Electrochemical reversibility refers
to the electron transfer kinetics between the electrode and
the analyte. When there is a low barrier to electron transfer
(electrochemical reversibility), the Nernstian equilibrium is
established immediately upon any change in applied potential.
By contrast, when there is a high barrier to electron transfer
(electrochemical irreversibility), electron transfer reactions are
sluggish and more negative (positive) potentials are required
to observe reduction (oxidation) reactions, giving rise to larger
ΔEp. Often electrochemically reversible processes were the
electron transfers are fast and the processes follow the Nernst
equations are referred to as “Nernstian.”
Importance of the Scan Rate :
The scan rate of the experiment controls how fast the applied
potential is scanned. Faster scan rates lead to a decrease in the
size of the diffusion layer; as a consequence, higher currents
are observed. For electrochemically reversible electron
transfer processes involving freely diffusing redox species, the
Randles−Sevcik equation describes how the peak current
ip (A) increases linearly with the square root of the scan rate
υ (V s−1), where n is the number of electrons transferred in the
redox event, A (cm2) is the electrode surface area (usually treated
as the geometric surface area), Do (cm2 s−1) is the diffusion
coefficient of the oxidized analyte, and C0 (mol cm−3) is the bulk
concentration of the analyte
The Randles−Sevcik equation can give indications as to
whether an analyte is freely diffusing in solution. As analytes can
sometimes adsorb to the electrode surface,it is essential to assess
whether an analyte remains homogeneous in solution prior to
analyzing its reactivity. In addition to verifying that the analyte is
freely diffusing, the Randles−Sevcik equation may be used to
calculate diffusion coefficients.
Adsorption/Desorption of Hydrogen on Pt electrodes:
The electrolysis of water, which was first observed by Volta in the
beginning of the 19th century, is probably the best studied
electrochemical process. At a Pt working electrode, water can be
either oxidized at positive potentials to produce oxygen or reduced
at negative potentials to produce hydrogen. Extensive studies of
both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions focused on their
kinetics, catalysis, and numerous applications including energy
storage. Adsorption of hydrogen and oxygen species occurs at less
negative (hydrogen) and positive (oxygen) potentials than their
evolution processes. Voltammetry in acidic solution is a standard
technique used for electrode characterization, and a typical cyclic
voltammogram (CV) at a large (i.e., millimeter-sized) Pt electrode
exhibits several pairs of peaks corresponding to
adsorption/desorption of hydrogen and oxygen containing species.
The characteristic value of charge density associated with a
monolayer of hydrogen adsorbed on polycrystalline platinum (210
µC/cm2 ) is widely used to determine the true (microscopic) surface
area of Pt electrodes. The ratio of the microscopic surface area to
the geometric area (Am/Ag) gives the roughness factor (F).
SCALE :
X-AXIS :0.2 mV
Y-AXIS :0.0002 μA
FOR SET 2:
SCALE :
X-AXIS :0.2 mV
Y-AXIS :0.0005 μA
SET 1 :
FOR H-DESORPTION :
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 210 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (17 x 0.00004 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 272 μC
● AREA = 272/210 = 1.29 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.29 / 0.08 = 16.125
FOR H-adsorption:
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 210 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (23 x 0.00004 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 368 μC
● AREA = 368/210 = 1.75 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.75 / 0.08 = 21.875
FOR Pt-oxide region :
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 420 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (97 x 0.00004 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 1552 μC
● AREA = 1552/420 = 3.69 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 3.69 / 0.08 = 46.175
SET 2 :
FOR H-DESORPTION :
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 210 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (14 x 0.00001 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 56 μC
● AREA = 56/210 = 1.29 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.29 / 0.08 = 16.125
FOR H-adsorption:
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 210 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (22 x 0.00001 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 88 μC
● AREA = 88/210 = 0.419 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 0.419 / 0.08 = 5.237
FOR Pt-oxide region :
● 1 square cm of ECSA is equal to 420 μC
● Area =area under the curve / ν
● Area = (96 x 0.00001 x 0.04 )/ (100 x 0.001 ) = 384 μC
● AREA = 384/420 = 0.914 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 0.914/ 0.08 = 11.425
RESULTS :
1.THE CV OF Aq. SOLUTION OF H2SO4SHOWED 4 DIFFERENT
REGIONS(MENTIONED IN PLOT) :
1. HYDROGEN ATOM DESORPTION
2. HYDROGEN ATOM ADSORPTION
3. OXIDE FORMATION
4. OXIDE REDUCTION
2.THE AREA AND ROUGHNESS FACTOR OF THE ELECTRODE BY
H-DESORPTION AND H-ADSORPTION :
SET 1-
H-DESORPTION:
● Area = 1.29 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.29 / 0.08 = 16.125
H-ADSORPTION:
● AREA = 1.75 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.75 / 0.08 = 21.875
SET -2 :
H-DESORPTION:
● AREA = 1.29 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 1.29 / 0.08 = 16.125
H-ADSORPTION:
● AREA = 0.419 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 0.419 / 0.08 = 5.237
3.THE AREA AND ROUGHNESS FACTOR OF THE ELECTRODE BY
Pt-OXIDE REGION :
SET -1 :
● AREA = 3.69 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 3.69 / 0.08 = 46.175
SET -2 :
● AREA = 0.914 cm2
● Roughness factor (R*) = 0.914/ 0.08 = 11.425