FORSC 3B - Activity 1
FORSC 3B - Activity 1
I. OBJECTIVE
To trace back the humble beginning and development of forensic chemistry history.
II. PROCEDURE
Create a timeline showing the beginning and development of forensic chemistry history.
PART 1. Search for significant events on the development of Forensic Chemistry in the world.
DATE EVENT
750 BCE To start with, this BCE the Murder weapons and also the method of
execution has been started, they use poison at the early Roman, Greek &
Egyptian Civilization.
1752 AD In this time, the first forensic test has been established. This is also where the
Mary Blandy Trial started.
1813 From the era of Mathieu Orfila, he made a significant contribution to the
development of tests for the presence of blood in a forensic context.
1836 A Scottish Chemist named James Marsh used the first toxicology forensic
detection in a jury trial. Marsh test has become popular from this time up to
present.
1851 In the land of Belgium, the first successful vegetable poison from the body
has been identified by Jean Servais Stas. He is a Chemistry professor from
the Brussel, Belgium.
1910 From the past years up to this era, everything is still improving. This time
1910 the first police crime laboratory has been established by Edmund
Locard which located at Lyon, France.
1960 As time passes by, the first forensic scientist named Lucas Douglas were
recognized for being excellent in discussing the use of gas Chromatography
in identifying petroleum products which suspected the cases of Arson.
1976 Everything has been explained, everyone got answers from their curiosity. In
this time Zoro and Hadley were discussed the use of mass spectrometry for
forensic use.
Page 1 of 3
Republic of the Philippines
CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Criminal Justice
Don Severino Delas Alas Campus, Indang, Cavite
Alcohol
Prescribed or illicit drugs
Other substances
Poisons
Metals
3. What are the factors to be considered during the collection of specimens for examination.
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIMENS FOR
EXAMINATION:
Sufficiency of Samples
As much as possible, the investigator in charge should collect a sufficient specimen for examination.
Because of this, the chemist will have the assurance that in the case of a doubtful result, there still have enough
samples to repeat the examination or proceed to the succeeding examination.
Maintenance of Individuality
It is necessary to collect and store each piece of evidence separately. Standard specimens and specimens
taken from various locations must not be mixed or combined.
Page 2 of 3
Republic of the Philippines
CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Criminal Justice
Don Severino Delas Alas Campus, Indang, Cavite
1. Go Slow
Good work cannot be hurried, therefore take all the time necessary to make the case complete, no matter how
urgent it may appear or how pressing others maybe for the result; it is generally possible to adjourn a case if work cannot
be finish in time.
2. Be Thorough
Make a careful and minute examination of everything and do not be satisfied with a qualitative analysis if a
quantitative one be possible; it’s always pays to do much rather than too little and it is difficult to foresee what will or will
not be required in court.
3. Take Notes
keep a full, neat and clean record of everything seen and done.
4. Consult Others
Many cases will lead the expert into paths with which he is not familiar, and when this happen, he should consult
those who are most likely to know.
5. Use Imagination
This is somewhat hazardous advice, since an expert with a vivid and uncontrolled imagination is a most
dangerous person; a discipline imagination, however which enables inferences and deductions to be made from slender
and incomplete premises is often very useful. in writing the report the imagination must be kept well in hand and the
expert should remember that what to him may be merely a helpful working hypothesis is liable to be taken by others for
more than it's true worth and to be adopted by them as final explanation.
6. Avoid Complicated Theory.
The simplest explanation is the most likely to be the right one
Page 3 of 3