.IESBA Code - Summary
.IESBA Code - Summary
Important terms
Actual or threatened litigation by client QCR (have an appropriate reviewer review the work
When litigation with an audit client occurs, or appears likely performed.
If a team member involved, remove from team
Threats: Withdraw from engagement if very significant
self-interest
intimidation threats.
Gifts and hospitality Need to check if allowed by local laws and regulations
Nature, frequency, value, timing of offer need to be
Threats to integrity, objectivity and professional behavior considered
Can only accept if trivial and no intention to influence
self-interest behavior
familiarity
intimidation (scared that would be considered wrong
if this is made public) .
Compensation and evaluation: When an audit team CANNOT evaluate or compensate a key audit partner based
member is evaluated on or compensated for selling non- on that partner’s success in selling non-assurance services to
assurance services to that audit client, the partner’s audit client. .
External QCR
Referral fee or commission Disclose to the client any referral fees or commission
arrangements paid or received
For example, where the firm does not provide the specific
service required, a fee may be received for referring a Receive written consent from client for commission
continuing client to another firm or other expert. arrangement.
Perceived as a loan to the client if it remains unpaid for a At least partial recovery or recovery plan before starting new
long time work
AAA: also means your firm’s credit control procedures are weak!
In the cooling off period, CANNOT participate in the audit or, provide
quality control for the engagement, or consult with the engagement
team or the client regarding technical or industry-specific issues or
have significant or frequent interaction with senior management etc.
Private clients
Temporary staff assignments: Lending of staff to the client Should ideally then not be made a part of the audit team
(Not including the loaned personnel as an audit team
Threats: member might address a familiarity or advocacy threat).
self-review
familiarity IF in the team, Not giving the loaned staff audit responsibility
advocacy for any function or activity that the staff performed during
management threat the temporary staff assignment ( this might address the self-
review threat)
Ensure
- only for a short period of time
- seconded staff should not assume management
responsibilities
- the audit client is responsible for directing and supervising
the activities of the personnel.
Employment with the client: the director or a senior Public interest: 12 months should have passed since the individual
member of the audit client has been a member of was Partner.
the audit team or partner of the firm in the past
Ensure no significant connection remains between the firm
Threats: and the individual ( e.g. material amounts owed by the firm
self-interest to the individual, participation in firm’s professional activities
familiarity etc)
intimidation Modify the audit plan;
Assign individuals to the audit team who have sufficient
experience in relation to the individual who has joined the
client; or
QCR of the former member of the audit team.
Threats:
self-interest
intimidation (due to actual or perceived pressure
about losing the audit assignment)
Loan and guarantees Okay if in normal course of business under normal lending
(Taking a loan from the client or giving a guarantee for the conditions
client’s loan) QCR
Threat:
self-interest
Financial interest
Team member/firm’s financial interest in a client:
Threats:
self-interest (threat to objectivity and confidentiality) Direct- not allowed
Second opinion
With the client’s permission, obtaining information from the
Firm might be asked to provide a second opinion existing or predecessor accountant.
on the application of accounting, auditing, reporting or
other standards or principles to an entity that is not an Ensure same set of facts given as existing auditor
existing client.
Where audit firms offer reduced (or unrealistic) fees to sign QCR
new audit clients
Threat:
self-interest (threat to compliance with the
principle of professional competence and due
care)
Threat to professional competence and due care and After taking custody
objectivity
Confidentiality to be ensured
self-interest Keep such assets separately from personal or firm assets;
Use such assets only for the purpose for which they are
intended;
Internal control in firm for security
Assuming Management responsibility for an audit client Generally, the threat is so significant that no safeguard is possible.
They involve responsibilities involve controlling, leading and
directing an entity, including making decisions regarding the If not related to decision making ( eg routine and administrative like
acquisition, deployment and control of human, financial, filing returns), ensure client management makes all judgments and
technological, physical and intangible resources. decisions that are the proper responsibility of management.
Threats
Self-review
self-interest threats
familiarity threat
Self-review Audit Clients that are Not Public Interest Entities: not allowed
Advocacy if the valuation involves a significant degree of subjectivity
and the valuation will have a material effect on the financial
statements on which the firm will express an opinion.
Administrative services Providing administrative services to an audit client does not usually
create a threat.
Administrative services involve assisting clients with their
routine or mechanical tasks within the normal course of
operations. Such services
require little to no professional judgment and are clerical in
nature.
Examples of administrative services include:
- Word processing services.
- Preparing administrative or statutory forms for
client approval.
- Submitting such forms as instructed by the client.
- Monitoring statutory filing dates, and advising an
audit client of those dates.
Internal audit
Audit Clients that are Public Interest Entities: Not allowed if
Internal audit services involve assisting the audit client in they relate to a significant part of the internal controls over
the performance of its internal audit activities. financial reporting or relate amounts/disclosures that are
material
Threat
Self-review (the results of internal audit service might Safeguards for self-review and management threats for
be used in conducting the external audit). clients that aren’t public interest or for internal audit service
Performing a significant part of the client’s internal that don’t relate to financial reporting:
audit activities increases the possibility that firm will
assume a management responsibility.
- Segregation of teams
- The client designates an appropriate and competent senior
management to be responsible at all times for internal audit
activities
- The client acknowledges responsibility for designing,
implementing, monitoring and maintaining internal control.
- The client evaluates and determines which
recommendations resulting from internal audit services to
implement and manages the implementation process
Professional & Ethical Considerations---Page 8 of 15
IT systems Audit Clients that are Public Interest Entities: NOT Allowed to
if relate to the internal control over financial reporting
Services related to IT systems include the design or
implementation of hardware or software systems. For other clients/other IT systems not related to financial
reporting:
Threat: - Segregation of teams
Self-review - The client has to acknowledge its responsibility for
Assuming management responsibility establishing and monitoring a system of internal controls
- The client should make all management decisions with
respect to the design and implementation process;
Tax services comprise a broad range of services, including Tax Calculations for the Purpose of Preparing Accounting Entries
activities such as:
- Tax return preparation.
- Tax calculations for the purpose of preparing the Audit Clients that are Public Interest Entities
accounting entries.
- Tax planning and other tax advisory services. NOT allowed if material to the F/S.
- Assistance in the resolution of tax disputes.
Audit Clients that are Not Public Interest Entities
- Segregation of teams
- QCR
- Segregation of teams
- QCR
Otherwise:
- Segregation of teams
- QCR
LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES Not allowed if relates to material amounts and involve judgment
Threats
Self-review
Advocacy
1. Identify: Use words from the scenario- no marks for this BUT need to tell the marker which point you’re going to be
discussing!
2. Name AND explain the threat (s): Two important points to remember. One, don’t simply write self-interest. That’s a zero!
Explain what it means. Secondly, most situations have more than one threat. Explain ALL. Each explained threat is for 1
mark!
4. Give a conclusion for the given situation. It would either be ‘it isn’t allowed so don’t do it’ OR it can be mitigated with
safeguards. EACH safeguard has 1 mark!
You are an audit manager in Coram & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants.
Your client portfolio as an audit manager at Coram & Co includes Turner Co which is a listed financial institution offering loans and
credit facilities to both commercial and retail customers. You have received an email from the audit supervisor who is currently
supervising interim testing on systems and controls in relation to the audit for the year ending 31 October 20X8. The email gives the
following details for your consideration:
One of the audit team members, Janette Stott, has provisionally agreed to take out a loan with Turner Co to finance the purchase of
a domestic residence. The loan will be secured on the property and the client’s business manager has promised Janette that he will
ensure that she gets ‘the very best deal which the bank can offer.’
The payroll manager at Turner Co has asked the audit supervisor if it would be possible for Coram & Co to provide a member of staff
on secondment to work in the payroll department. The payroll manager has struggled to recruit a new supervisor for the
organisation’s main payroll system and wants to assign a qualified member of the audit firm’s staff for an initial period of six months.
Required: Comment on the ethical and professional issues raised in respect of the audit of Turner Co and recommend any actions
to be taken by the audit firm. (6 marks)
You are a manager in Dando & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants responsible for the audit of the Adams Group, a listed
entity. The Group operates in the textile industry, buying cotton, silk and other raw materials to manufacture a range of goods
including clothing, linen and soft furnishings.
The Group’s accounting and management information systems are out of date, and the Group would like to develop and implement
new systems next year. The audit committee would like to obtain advice from Dando & Co on the new systems as they have little
specialist in-house knowledge in this area.
In addition, the audit committee requests that the Group audit engagement partner attends a meeting with the Group’s bank, which
is planned to be held the week after the auditor’s report is issued. The purpose of the meeting is for the Group to renegotiate its
existing lending facility and to extend its loan, and will be attended by the Group finance director, a representative of the audit
committee, as well as the bank manager. The Group is hoping that the audit partner will be able to confirm the Group’s strong
financial position at the meeting, and also confirm that the audit included procedures on going concern, specifically the audit of the
Group’s cash flow forecast for the next two years, which the bank has requested as part of their lending decision.
Required: Identify and evaluate any ethical threats and other professional issues which arise from the requests made by the
Group audit committee. (6 marks)
You are an audit manager in Thomasson & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. You have recently been assigned to the
audit of Clean Co for the year ended 30 September 20X8. Clean Co is an unlisted company and has been an audit client of your firm
for a number of years. Clean Co is a national distributor of cleaning products. Clean Co’s chief executive is Simon Blackers.
Your review of the audit working papers and an initial meeting with Mr Blackers have identified the following potential issues:
Following your review of the audit engagement letter and the working papers of the taxation section of the audit file, you have
established that Thomasson & Co performed the taxation computation for Clean Co and completed the tax returns for both the
company and Mr Blackers personally. All of the taxation services have been invoiced to Clean Co as part of the total fee for the audit
and professional services.
During your initial meeting with Mr Blackers, he informed you that Clean Co is planning to develop a new website in order to offer
online sales to its customers. He has asked Thomasson & Co to provide assistance with the design and implementation of the
website and online sales system.
As a result of your audit review visit at the client’s premises, you have learned that the audit team was invited to and subsequently
attended Clean Co’s annual office party. The client provided each member of the audit team with a free voucher worth $30 which
could be redeemed at the venue during the party. The audit senior, Paula Metcalfe, who has worked on the audit for the last three
years has informed you that the audit team has always been encouraged to attend the party in order to develop good client
relations.
Comment on the ethical and professional issues arising from your review of the audit working papers and recommend any actions
which should now be taken by Thomasson & Co. (9 marks)