0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views52 pages

Develop A Competencies Framework For Digital Transformation in The Banking Industry

Uploaded by

Abdisa Bira
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views52 pages

Develop A Competencies Framework For Digital Transformation in The Banking Industry

Uploaded by

Abdisa Bira
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 52

Masters Thesis

Develop a competencies framework for digital transformation


in the banking industry

Author: Supervisor:
Panithan Phongphaew Prof. dr. Johan Jeuring
Second Supervisor:
Dr. Nico Brand

A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements


for the degree of MSc Business Informatics

October 14, 2022


2

Abstract
Concerning the banking industry, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) stated that digital technology might significantly impact increased
competitiveness and contestability in financial markets. Because of this, banking will move
to a platform-based, customer-centric model, which will require incumbents to change.
Several technologies, such as social, mobile, and big data, play a part in driving changes in
banking models, where technology has revolutionized the bank's operations. The banking
industry must plan its organization ahead of time, and human capital is critical.
Organizations and people are being forced to change due to technological disruption. It has
become commonplace for employees to need to learn new skills. Also, a company's training
and development strategy should align with its business model to help employees get
better skills for jobs in the 21st century. As a result, this study aims to understand and
develop a digital competency framework for digital transformation in the banking industry.
This thesis discusses the related theoretical framework for digital transformation, a skills
and competencies framework, the method used to get the results, a discussion, and
conclusions, including limitations and suggestions for more research.

Keywords: Digital competencies, Skill, Digital transformation, Banking


3

Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Thesis Composition......................................................................................................................... 6
2. Theoretical background....................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 The banking industry ..................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Digital transformation .................................................................................................................. 7
2.2.1 Digital transformation framework ...................................................................................... 7
2.2.2 Digital transformation in the banking sector................................................................... 9
2.3 Skills and competencies ................................................................................................................ 9
2.3.1 Digital competency framework (DCF) .............................................................................. 10
2.3.2 Technical competency framework .....................................................................................12
2.4 Digital competency framework for banking industry ..........................................................12
3. Research Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 14
3.1 Research objectives ....................................................................................................................... 14
3.2 Research question......................................................................................................................... 14
3.3 Research methodology ................................................................................................................. 15
3.3.1 Literature review ..................................................................................................................... 15
3.3.2 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 17
4. Findings .................................................................................................................................................18
4.1 Search strategy ...............................................................................................................................18
4.2 Data extraction.............................................................................................................................. 19
4.3 Data synthesis and Qualitative analysis ...................................................................................21
4.3.1 Digital transformation in the banking industry ............................................................... 2
4.3.2 Digital and technical skills for the banking industry ..................................................... 4
4.4 Survey................................................................................................................................................ 7
4.4.1 Data collection.......................................................................................................................... 7
4.4.2 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................. 1
5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 3
5.1 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 3
5.1.1 Digital and Technical Skills .................................................................................................... 3
5.1.2 Structural Changes in the Banking Industry ..................................................................... 5
5.1.3 Answering the Main Question ............................................................................................... 5
5.2 Validity .............................................................................................................................................. 6
5.2.1 Internal Validity ....................................................................................................................... 6
5.2.2 External Validity ...................................................................................................................... 6
5.2.3 Construct Validity.................................................................................................................... 7
5.3 Limitations ....................................................................................................................................... 7
4

5.4 Future studies .................................................................................................................................. 8


5.4.1 Digital Competencies Framework ....................................................................................... 8
5.4.2 Digital Transformation Strategies ...................................................................................... 8
5.4.3 Training and Development Strategies ............................................................................... 8
6. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 9
References .................................................................................................................................................. 11
List of TABLES........................................................................................................................................... 17
List of FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... 17
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................................18
5

1. Introduction
Many factors, such as a more efficient transportation system, better communication, or e-
commerce business, have made doing business considerably more competitive in recent years. Levitt
(1983) coined the term "globalization" to describe these shifts in the economic world. The globe,
according to Levitt, will become increasingly interconnected. As a result, the key to competitive success
is to keep improving products and services to meet the global standard. Other studies discovered that
to be successful, businesses must design products and tactics that are tailored to each market's unique
qualities.
In a competitive era, one of the buzzwords is innovation. According to studies (Schumpeter,
1934) innovation is defined as the combination of existing resources to create something new, such as
a product idea or operational systems. These changes may prove to be more sustainable than price
competition in terms of improving the company's business.
Aside from innovation, rapid technological growth has altered society and is still changing the
way businesses operate. To stay in business, a company must embrace digitization (Garth et al., 2016).
Transformation is essential on all levels, according to Lanzolla and Anderson (2008), to develop a
modern organization capable of continuous change.
With respect to the banking industry, the OECD (2019) stated that digital technology might have
a significant impact on increasing competitiveness and contestability in financial markets. Banking
will shift to a platform-based, customer-centric paradigm, requiring incumbents to restructure.
According to Krstić and Tešić (2016), the banking industry has been one of the most disrupted
industries in recent years. Previously, customers had to go to a bank on their own and need at least a
bank branch to perform most transactions, but thanks to technological advancements, they can now
do most transactions on their mobile phone, tablet, or personal computer. Several technologies, such
as social technology, mobile technology, and big data, play a part in driving changes in banking models,
where technology has revolutionized the bank's operation (Wewege & Thomsett, 2019). In conclusion,
the advancement of information technology, as well as widespread use of computers, the internet, and
mobile phones, has had a significant impact on the financial sector, resulting in the introduction of
new companies, financial instruments, and products, as well as other industries.
To prepare for this situation, the banking industry must plan its organization ahead of time, and
human capital is critical. To increase organizational competencies and the ability to innovate, a
corporation must consider various things, according to Drucker (1999). It must take elements such as
new management or an improved information management structure into account, as well as the
productivity of labor, which is based on knowledge of and aptitude to work. Many aspects of
organizations have been transformed by digital technology, and this change has created new
circumstances in which many organizations are struggling to survive, such as the global market's
diversity, rising customer expectations for product and service quality, and the impact of the internet
on an organization's business (Markowitsch et al., 2002). Organizations and people are being forced to
change as a result of technological disruption (OECD, 2019). It has become commonplace for employees
to need to learn new skills. Furthermore, research shows that investing in employee training helps to
retain them, resulting in a competitive advantage (Sousa & Rocha, 2019).
An organization's training and development strategy should be aligned with its business
model to increase employee skills for 21st century employment. As a result, the purpose of this study is
to understand and develop organizational training and development strategies, and a skills and
competencies framework toward digital transformation in the IT-related departments. This thesis
describes the related theoretical framework for digital transformation, a skills and competencies
framework, the methodology to arrive at the findings, a discussion, and conclusions, including
limitations and further research.
6

1.1 Thesis Composition

The remainder of this thesis is structured as follows:

Chapter 2 gives the theoretical foundation of this thesis. Here, relevant existing knowledge areas are
explored and systematically analyzed following a rigorous review process. This is done by considering
the most influential literature in the investigated research fields. This process resulted in a solid
understanding of theory and provided the basis that guided the development of the digital
competencies.

Chapter 3 gives a comprehensive account of the research methodology. This chapter includes the
choice of research strategy and design that provide the structure to guide the research process. Next,
the research methods, techniques, and tools deemed appropriate for data collection and analysis are
presented.

Chapter 4 synthesizes and aggregates the findings from the systematic literature review (SLR) and
survey. This chapter is structured into three main sections. The first section is the result of a
systematic literature review. The second section provides statistical results from the survey. Section
three concludes with a summary of the findings on how digital competencies influenced digital
transformation. The primary focus of this chapter is to address the main research question.

Chapter 5 concludes by summarizing the research findings. The conclusions are about our research
objectives and questions, as well as relevant business practices and academic fields. Finally, we
suggest areas for further research and the study's limitations.
7

2. Theoretical background

2.1 The banking industry


The financial service industry has long strived to stay at the forefront of technological
advancement. Commercial banks have historically been active in forming joint ventures, licensing
agreements, and mergers and acquisitions (Pennings & Harianto, 1992). Then, information technology
became a fundamental aspect of financial services operations and delivery. Commercial banks are
beginning to draw parallels with other service-oriented industries like telecommunications and
transportation. New business models emerged as a result of these connections, such as large-scale
credit cards and automated teller machine (ATM) networks. The financial services sector is now
confronted by a new challenge, as a result of different digital technologies, social media, cloud
computing, data analytics, and process digitization (Wewege & Thomsett, 2019). Banks will surely be
more efficient in the future, with technologically equipped bank branches and services, appropriate
self-service machines, and computers focusing on the bank's primary purpose of serving customers.
The primary goals that banks must achieve through digital transformation in the future are to adapt
services and ways of servicing to new ways of doing business, as well as the introduction of services
based on human experience. These problems have the potential to disrupt incumbent firms and
reshape marketplaces for customers. Policymakers face new problems as the landscape shifts and they
must ensure that what will almost certainly be a very different environment is safe, resilient, and runs
in a way that promotes economic progress while also protecting the community. Furthermore, to
preserve a stable financial system, regulators cannot afford to lag too far behind commercial reality.
Another issue is the role of human factors in banking. Human capital can play a positive or a
negative role through the whole banking system (Posnaya et al., 2017). Recent research in the financial
sector has generated insight into how risk is managed and produced concrete findings on the nature
and consequence of human factors problems in financial trading (e.g. errors, skill gaps, resources)
(Leaver & Reader, 2016). Therefore, lack of skilled human capital can turn out to be a disadvantage for
the implementation of complex digital innovations and the general digital change in banks (Diener &
Špaček, 2021). To gain and sustain a competitive advantage in the banking industry, it is crucial to
improve the competence of the bank staff.

2.2 Digital transformation


2.2.1 Digital transformation framework
Since new technologies are appearing in such a high volume and at such a rapid pace, the term
"digital transformation" (DT) has become popular among organizations in recent years. Digital
transformation is a holistic concept that includes technologies, as well as organizational and strategic
changes (Matt et al., 2015). Digital transformation strategies can be described along four essential
dimensions: use of technologies, changes in value creation, structural changes, and financial aspects
(Matt et al., 2015). The four transformational dimensions and their dependencies can be integrated into
one joint Digital Transformation Framework.

Figure 1 Digital transformation framework: balancing four transformational dimensions (Matt et al., 2015).
8

To ensure the successful rollout of a digital transformation strategy, all these four dimensions
are considered as part of the framework, which will support firms in the assessment of their current
abilities and the formulation of a digital transformation strategy.
DT has been a key strategy for improving an organization's operational performance (Hess et
al., 2016; Matt et al., 2015). DT has the power to drive enterprises to more promising growth
possibilities and increased profitability (Loonam et al., 2018). According to Westerman and Bonnet
(2015), companies with strong digital strategies were 26 percent more lucrative than their industry
peers, while traditional business earned 9 percent more income. Figure 1 shows a conceptual
framework that aids in seeing and understanding the overall DT process (Vial, 2019).

Figure 2 Building blocks of the DT process from Vial (2019).

DT has an impact on numerous parts of the organization, as indicated in Figure 1. Many aspects
of DT, including employee roles and skills, necessitate structural modifications. The organization
should prepare both employees and management with essential competencies required for the digital
transformation strategy. Employee competencies are one of the most serious issues that organizations
face when it comes to digital transformation. According to Kane (2019), technology evolves quicker
than people can adapt to it. The actual problem is that these technologies are being assimilated at
various speeds at different levels in the organization (Kane, 2019). As a result of technological
disruptions, a company should comprehend the concept of technology adoption as it relates to the
diffusion of innovation theory. In the diffusion of innovation model, Rogers (2003) classified
innovation adopters into innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards based
on varied rates and phases, as illustrated in figure 2. Adoption refers to the difference between the rate
at which technology evolves and how people integrate those changes into their everyday work routine
(Rogers, 2003). The model's output is a logistic function of cumulative adoption, in which innovation
happens quickly as early and late majorities adopt. People embrace a new idea, behavior, or product as
a result of this adoption.

Figure 3 Diffusion of innovation model from Rogers (2003).


9

Because early adopters are the most eager to devote time and resources to test the innovation,
they might be considered a strategic sector of the innovators (Valdani & Arbore, 2013). Because early
adopters are not innovators, they can assist in motivating the public by reducing the amount of
uncertainty surrounding the idea by implementing it (Momani et al., 2018). Early adopters can be
thought of as people who can lead an organization's transformation since they are primed for change
and eager to acquire and implement new ideas. Therefore, an appropriate training program is required
during the digital adoption process. The training should help employees and managers learn new ideas
and support digital adoption. (Varshney, 2020).
In conclusion, organizations use DT to alter the value creation paths they have previously relied
upon to remain competitive. To that end, they must implement structural changes and overcome
barriers that hinder their transformation effort (Vial, 2019).

2.2.2 Digital transformation in the banking sector


The financial sector, particularly the banking sector, is a fast-paced industry with fierce
product and service rivalry. As a result, banks are working hard to expand, adapt, and restructure to
avoid falling behind their competitors. The role of the financial industry in economic growth elevates
the relevance of financial innovations, which can be defined as new entities that reduce risks, costs, or
provide a product/service/instrument that better meets the demands of the parties involved than
before (Frame & White, 2004). The digitalization of the banking industry uses a number of different
technologies. One crucial drive to increase industry competition is the development of digital banking
systems, which allow services to be provided through digital channels (Machkour & Abriane, 2020). As
a result of the advancement of digital transformation, Fintech (Financial Technology) projects have
emerged as one of the most important developments in the financial industry. Fintech (Financial
Technology) projects have emerged as one of the most significant developments in the financial
industry. Fintech uses digital, mobile, AI, and other technologies to improve financial and banking
services' speed, cost, and efficiency. Many technologies also provide services in the following areas:
Banking APIs, Artificial Intelligence, Personal Finance, Retail Investments, Corporate Investments,
P2P (peer-to-peer) lending, Mass Finance, Asset Management, Money Transfer, Critical Data and
Analysis, Financial Platforms, Regulatory Technologies, Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Technology,
Robo Assistants, and Next Generation Banking (Machkour & Abriane, 2020). Despite the numerous
benefits of digital transformation, it is recognized that it adds to a more complicated, fast changing,
and disruptive business environment.
From a business perspective, the use of new technologies often implies changes in value
creation in DT. With different forms of value creation, structural changes are often needed to provide
an adequate basis for the new operations. Structural changes refer to variations in a firm’s
organizational setup including organizational structure, organizational culture, leadership, employee
roles and skills. To accommodate the change, companies are establishing an additional position at top
management level: the chief digital officer (CDO). CDOs are employed to make digital transformation
a strategic priority in their companies (Matt et al., 2015). CDOs have a wider role and should have cross-
department authority for digital initiatives and aim to transform the company as a whole. Matt et al.
(2015) defines the scope of DT in the Financial Services industry as proceeding with great caution or
“carefully innovative” due to the important concerns about security and confidentiality. As a result,
the current focus of the digital transformation is on providing fundamental digital tools and devices
and changing internal mindsets and skills. CDOs might thus provide their expertise about the
industry's technological standpoint.

2.3 Skills and competencies


To further comprehend the concept and application of skills and competencies, a literature
review was conducted. Rychen & Salganik (2003) describe competence as more than just knowledge or
skills. It involves the ability to meet complex demands by drawing on and mobilizing psychosocial
resources (including skills and attitudes) in a particular context. For example, the ability to
communicate effectively is a competence that may draw on an individual’s knowledge of the language,
practical IT skills and attitudes towards those with whom he or she is communicating. Furthermore,
Ananiadou et al. (2009) defines a skill as follows: the ability to perform tasks and solve problems, while
a competence is the ability to apply learning outcomes adequately in a defined context (education,
work, personal or professional development. In conclusion, we would like to describe competency and
skills in the following manner:
Competency is the knowledge, behaviors, attitudes, and even skills that lead to the ability to
perform a task successfully or efficiently. For example, a competency would be the ability to make
business decisions.
10

Skill is a set of acquired, practical abilities that allow one to execute or perform something while
utilizing knowledge. Based on the same example of business decisions, people need to keep certain
skills to perform business decision tasks well: budgeting, market research, and competitive strategy.
However, the above definitions only define skills and competence concepts that are still not
focused on digital. Therefore, we found that the Council of the European Union (2006) defines digital
competence as the ability to use information and communication technology (ICT) with confidence,
critical thinking, and creativity to achieve goals related to employment, employability, learning,
leisure, inclusion, and participation in society. Digital competencies include using computers to find,
analyze, save, create, display, and exchange information, as well as to interact and work together in
networks through the Internet. To make digital competence easier to understand, Punie et al.( 2014)
describe that it is the set of knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to be active in digital environments
and get the most out of technology in everyday life.
In the next step, existing and established frameworks for skills and competencies were
reviewed in this study to adapt the framework to apply it in the banking industry. This study
contributes to developing a digital skills and competencies framework for organizations in the banking
sector to use in identifying their specific digital transformation needs.

2.3.1 Digital competency framework (DCF)


To accomplish digital transformation, employees must have basic skills as well as industry-
specific skills. The concept of digital literacy has provided Internet newbies users with the fundamental
thinking abilities and core competencies they will need to survive in an interactive environment that is
fundamentally different from passive media like television or print (Gilster, 1997).
Digital competence is regarded as one of the most important skills for a European citizen to
face new challenges. The European Commission conducts research on digital competence and has
established the “Digital Competence (DIGCOMP)” benchmark for EU citizens.
Based on the Communication of the Directorates General for Education and Culture (DG EAC),
the European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2006) treated digital skills and
competences from a lifelong learning perspective, designating Digital Competence as one of the 8 Key
Competencies for European citizens.
Individuals should be able to use tools to produce, present, and understand complicated
information, as well as access, search, and utilise internet-based services, to gain digital competency.
Individuals should be able to use IST to help them think critically, creatively, and innovatively.
The European Commission set out in 2013 to find comprehensive conceptual descriptors of
Digital Competence. The Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission's scientific and
knowledge service centre, created DIGCOMP as a scientific project with extensive stakeholder input,
first on behalf of the DG EAC and Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG EMPL) (Ferrari, 2013).
JRC published DIGCOMP 2.0 in June 2016, upgrading the conceptual model of DIGCOMP and
demonstrating its implementation at the European, national, and regional levels. DIGCOMP 2.1 is the
most recent version. It expands the description of proficiency levels and offers application examples
for each level. Its goal is to assist stakeholders with DIGCOMP's further implementation (Carretero et
al., 2017).
There are five domains of digital competency in the DIGCOMP framework 2.1. The
competencies are divided into four degrees of proficiency. The framework is laid down in a table format.
It is a matrix with multiple dimensions that can be shown in a variety of ways. There are examples of
knowledge, abilities, and attitudes in DIGCOMP 2.1, as well as instances of how competence can be
applied to reach various goals.
There are five aspects of digital competence that can be summarized as follows:
1. Information: determining the relevance and purpose of digital information by locating,
retrieving, storing, organizing, and analyzing it.
2. Communication: to communicate in digital environments, to exchange resources via online
tools, to connect with others and cooperate via digital technologies, to interact with and participate in
communities and networks, and to be conscious of cultural differences.
3. Content-creation: creating and editing new content (from word processing to photos and
video); integrating and re-elaborating previous knowledge and content; producing creative
expressions, media outputs, and programming; dealing with and applying intellectual property rights
and licenses.
4. Safety: personal safety, data security, digital identity security, security measures, and safe
and long-term use.
11

5. Problem-solving: identify digital needs and resources, make educated decisions on the most
appropriate digital tools based on the purpose or need, solve conceptual problems using digital means,
use technology creatively, address technical problems, and update own and others' competence.
Table 1 depicts an example of a competency area with a full explanation, whereas Table 2
depicts a description of each level in the DIGCOMP framework 2.1.

Competence area Description Level


1: Information and data 1.1 Browsing, searching, filtering data, information, and 1.Foundation
literacy digital content 2.Intermediate
1.2 Evaluating data, information, and digital content 3.Advanced
1.3 Managing data, information, and digital content 4. Highly
2: Communication and 2.1 Interacting through digital technologies Specialized
collaboration 2.2 Sharing thought digital technologies
2.3 Engaging in citizenship through digital technologies
2.4 Collaborating through digital technologies
2.5 Netiquette
2.6 Managing digital identity
3: Digital content creation 3.1 Developing digital content.
3.2 Integrating and re-elaborating digital content
3.3 Copyright and licenses
3.4 Programming
4: Safety 4.1 Protecting devices
4.2 Protecting personal data and privacy
4.3 Protecting health and well-being
4.4 Protecting the environment
5: Problem solving 5.1 Solving technical problems
5.2 Identifying needs and technological responses
5.3 Creatively using digital technologies
5.4 Identifying digital competence gaps

Table 1. Digital Competence framework 2.1 (Carretero et al., 2017)

Level Description Task


1: Foundation 1.1 At basic level and with • recognise simple appropriate digital technologies
guidance, I can: to share data, information, and digital content.
1.2 At basic level and with • identify simple referencing and attribution
autonomy and appropriate practices.
guidance where needed, I can:
2: Intermediate 2.1 On my own and solving • explain where my digital competence needs to be
straightforward problems, I can: improved or updated,
2.2 Independently, according to • indicate where to seek
my own needs, and solving well- well-defined opportunities for self-developments
defined and non-routine and to keep up-to-date with the digital evolution
problems, I can:
3: Advanced 3.1 As well as guiding others, I can: • demonstrate where my own digital competence
3.2 At advanced level, according to needs to be improved or updated,
my own needs and those of others, • illustrate different ways to support others in the
and in complex contexts, I can: development of their digital competence.
• propose different opportunities found for self-
development and to keep up-to-date with the digital
evolution.
4: Highly 4.1 At highly specialised level, • create solutions to complex problems with limited
Specialized I can: definition that are related to improving digital
4.2 At the most advanced and competence, and to find opportunities for self-
specialised level, I can: development and to keep up-to-date with new
developments.
• integrate my knowledge to contribute to
professional practice and knowledge and to guide
others in identifying digital competence gaps.

Table 2. Proficiency levels (Carretero et al., 2017)

The digital competency framework may vary depending on the sort of employment. We will
look at the capabilities of a group working on digital transformation in the banking industry. As a
result, we will identify specific skill demands that drives an organization in the banking industry’s
digital transformation.
12

2.3.2 Technical competency framework


Apart from digital skills, technical skills are also considered an important need to push digital
transformation in the organization. For example, the banking industry needs employees who have
data science skills to deal with big data, and who should be able to make smart decisions for the
business. We found research studies on digital skills focusing on the skills required for digital banking
as summarized in Table 3.

Authors Methodology Result Targeted skills


Pinzone et literature review, Sets of technical - Design and implementation of Big Data
al.(2017) focus groups and in- skills for architectures and software platforms
depth interviews Industry 4.0 - Design of data and workflow models
- Big Data analytics
- Infographics for intuitive and engaging
interpretation of data analytics
- User experience design
Mikalef and literature review, Technical Skills - Data science skills
Krogstie focus groups and in- (Skills ranked in (10 Skills ranked in order of importance)
(2019) depth interviews order of Exploratory data analysis
importance) Data visualization
Machine learning techniques
Data mining
Data modeling
Data cleansing/preparation
Research methods and empirical validation
Data processing
Statistical analysis
Data integration
Soft Skills - Identifying situations requiring participative
(Skills ranked in group problem solving and to utilize the proper
order of degree and type of participation
importance) - Cross-disciplinary collaboration
- Recognizing obstacles of collaborative group
problem solving and implement appropriate
corrective actions
- Plan and execute work in a collective environment
- Communication
- Presentation skills to different disciplines
- Work with international partners and co-workers
- Ability to present ideas in a clear and concise
manner
- Writing clear, concise, and effective memos,
reports, and documentation
- Listen non-evaluatively and to appropriately use
active listening techniques
Van Laar et literature review, 21st-century - Technical skills
al. (2018) interviews, digital skills - Information skills
pilot survey, - Communication skills
full survey - Collaboration skills
- Critical-thinking skills
- Creative skills
- Problem-solving skills

Table 3. The authors, methodology and results for digital skills theory background

Table 3 shows digital skills that we can use in our research to identify the required skills for the
banking industry. There are some similarities in competencies when comparing DIGCOMP with the
results from the literature review. DIGCOMP, for example, includes information and data literacy
skills. Mikalef and Krogstie (2019) state that data skills are also important, and those skills should be
at a level higher than the DIGCOMP model. To create a more comprehensive competency framework,
it is necessary to identify the competencies that are absent from the DIGCOMP framework.

2.4 Digital competency framework for banking industry


Digital transformations will often accompany shifting skill sets required for the actual
change and ongoing operations. The current employees might not have the technical aptitude to
13

change and have a less digitally knowledgeable mindset (Matt et al., 2015). This thesis could assist
businesses by directing the evaluation of their employees' digital capabilities and advising on the
design of training programs for both current workers and new hires. This research found that a
DIGCOMP framework can be used to observe the required level of digital skills. However, no explicit
technical skill frameworks supporting the organization's digital transformation could be identified.
Therefore, we need to develop a framework for digital competencies that includes the technical and
digital skills required to promote digital transformation in the banking industry.
14

3. Research Methodology
The research approach used for this study is described in this chapter. This thesis aims to investigate
the relationship between human capital and digital transformation, as well as the banking industry's
digital competency framework. To achieve this, we have performed a systematic literature review
based on the original guidelines (Kitchenham, 2007). Based on the findings of our systematic
literature review, we can create a preliminary definition of the digital competencies framework
required to support digital transformation. To increase confidence about the framework's
applicability and relative importance, we surveyed experts in the banking industry. The survey results
improved the banking industry's digital competencies framework.

The overview of research process is illustrated below.

Figure 4 The overview of research process.

3.1 Research objectives


- To explore the current state-of-the-art of competencies frameworks for digital transformation.
- To develop a competencies framework that facilitates structural change within the banking industry.
- To identify the characteristic of competencies that support the digital transformation process in
banking industry.

3.2 Research question

(RQ1) What do (Chief) Digital Officers in banking industry perceive as the most important digital and
technical skills for the banking industry?

Explanation: This RQ aims to identify the digital competencies from the perspective of the
CDO in the banking industry. In addition to digital skills, we would like to observe technical
skills that are needed to support DT. The theoretical background demonstrates a connection
between digital competencies and digital transformation. If employees have a digital skill set,
they can provide better support DT activities and be ready for the change that may be caused
by a DT. Based on the above explanation, we can develop sub-RQs as follow.

(Sub RQ 1.1) What digital skills drive DT in the banking industry?


(Sub RQ 1.2) What level is necessary for these digital skills?
(Sub RQ 1.3) What technical skills drive DT in the banking industry?
(Sub RQ 1.4) What level is necessary for these technical skills?

Once we have identified these skills, we can develop a proper digital competencies framework
for the banking industry. However, we would like to investigate how the framework can
support structural change in RQ2.
15

(RQ2) What is the most critical business unit that should use the digital competencies framework to
support structural change?

Explanation: This RQ aims to locate the business unit in the banking industry that needs to
prepare for technological change (e.g., Fintech, Cryptocurrency). The result from this RQ could
support firms by assessing their existing employee capabilities and providing guidance on the design
of training procedures for current employees and new hires.

(RQ3) What is the most important structural change for a successful digital transformation?

Explanation: This RQ explores the most important structural change that affects a successful
transformation. Structural changes involve four main parts: organizational structure, organizational
culture, leadership, employee roles and skill. We expect to find the importance of each structural part
that has a high impact on digital transformation in the organization from a CDO perspective.

3.3 Research methodology


Table 4 shows the various research methods used to answer the research questions. Each research
method is described in the paragraphs below.

RESEARCH QUESTION RESEARCH METHOD


RQ1 Literature review, Survey
RQ2 Literature review, Survey
RQ3 Literature review, Survey
Table 4. Summary of research methods

3.3.1 Literature review


The three main steps of a successful review are preparing, conducting, and reporting the
review (Kitchenham, 2007; Xiao & Watson, 2019).
Researchers assess the need for a review, define research questions, and develop a review
process during the planning stage. The researchers perform the review by identifying and selecting
main studies and extracting, analyzing, and synthesizing data. Then the researchers write the review
report to share their findings from the literature review. Despite differences in approach, all forms of
literature reviews may be conducted using the similar eight procedures: (1) formulate the research
problem; (2) develop and validate the review process; (3) search the literature; (4) screen for
inclusion; (5) assess quality; (6) extract data; (7) analyze and synthesize data; and (8) report the
findings (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Protocol of systematic literature review (Xiao & Watson, 2019).

To minimize potential bias, both quantitative and qualitative analyses were used in this
study. The focus of a qualitative approach is the content of the literature. A quantitative approach is
16

based on a bibliometric review using "publish or perish". It uses the Scopus database to present the
following statistics: Total number of papers, Total number of quotes, Average number of citations per
paper, Average number of citations per author, Average number of papers per author, Average
number of citations per year. Citations are a common way of judging the most influential work in
different fields. The most cited articles often provide new insights, open a new avenue of research, or
provide a significant summary of the state-of-the-art in an area (Wohlin, 2007).

(1) Planning stage: A systematic review approach is adopted to achieve this thesis's
objectives. As the first step, we specified a problem and reformulated a goal into a clear, structured,
and unambiguous question before starting as the protocol indicated. Particularly interesting topics
include the framework for digital skills, digital transformation, and the effects on the financial sector.

(2) Conducting stage: The search method used in our thesis is called a Boolean search
(AND/OR). We combine different terms using the OR and AND logic operators. The literature search
has focused on scientific articles published in English between 2000 and 2022. A set of relevant
keywords were selected through previous articles and papers in the same field or with similar scope,
and the final terms used can be seen in table x. The different compositions of terms were searched for
in keywords, abstracts, and titles. The search string used is: [("Digital transformation" OR
"Digitalization" OR "Industry 4.0" OR "Chief Digital Officer") AND ("Competency" OR "Digital
competency" OR "Digital skill" OR "Technical skill" OR "Framework" OR "Competency framework")
AND ("Bank" OR "Banking industry" OR "Central bank" OR "Retail bank" OR "Commercial bank" OR
"Fintech")]

DT Context AND Competency Context AND Industry Context


“OR” “OR” “OR”
Digital transformation Competency Bank
Digitalization Digital competency Banking industry
Industry 4.0 Digital skill Central bank
Chief Digital Officer Technical skill Retail bank
Competency framework Fintech

Table 5. Search terms and keywords

The initial selection from the database was not limited and included papers from other
research fields (including other sectors, not only banking and financial sectors). Because this thesis
aims to provide an overview of the research fields that concentrate on issues regarding the
framework for digital competencies and contexts for digital transformation and explore their impact
on the banking industry, we narrowed the search results based on quality measures. We established
the selection criteria determining which studies are included and excluded. The abstracts, and titles
were first manually reviewed for content.
Inclusion criteria:
-The review should be related to DT and competency and must relate to the research question.
-The publication must have a clear methodology that outlines the steps and approaches to its
research data and findings.
-The research must come from trusted resources and journals (i.e., Scopus and ScienceDirect).
-The paper's publication year must be between 2000 and 2022.
-The paper is written in English.
Exclusion criteria:
-Studies are presenting non-peer reviewed material.
-Studies not presented in English.
-Studies not accessible in full-text.
-Books and gray literature.

(3) Reporting stage: For literature reviews to be reliable and independently repeatable, the
process of systematic literature review must be reported in sufficient detail (Okoli & Schabram, 2012).
This will allow other researchers to follow the same steps described and arrive at the same results.
Once the data extraction process is complete, the reviewer will organize the data according to their
chosen review. The research finding section will show the number and the reason for included and
excluded articles in each stage, as shown in figure 6.
17

Figure 6 Example of literature search and evaluation for inclusion.

3.3.2 Survey
We conduct a survey based on the result of the ideal skill and competency framework from the
literature review. We use purposive sampling to select experts who have worked in the banking industry
and have experience with digital transformation activities to answer the research questions. A
purposive sample, referred to as a judgmental or expert sample, is a nonprobability sample. The main
objective of a purposive sample is to produce a sample that can be logically assumed to be
representative of the population (Robinson, 2014). The target group is a CDO or person in the group of
digital officers related to DT in the organization. The literature review results suggest that this group
is involved in the organization's digital transformation activities. The expected number of respondents
in total is around 30. We want to rely on CDO/digital office advice to determine the suitable
competencies and skill sets for the banking industry. Participants are asked to respond to questions
about each competency area's description using a five-point Likert scale. Youn et al. (2017) suggests
that a five-point scale allows respondents to express their true neutral or indifferent opinion;
respondents are not forced to agree or disagree. This type of survey is suitable for respondents who are
familiar with the topic and should be allowed to express a neutral opinion. A five-point Likert scale also
has the advantage that it can be used for statistical analysis purposes.

Part Question Answer Type of question


Part 1 Questions about digital skills RQ1 - Rating scale question
Part 2 Questions about technical skills RQ1 - Open ended question
Part 3 Questions about the characteristics of digital RQ2,
transformations in banking industry RQ3
Part 4 Contact information - - Open ended question
Table 6. Survey structure

The complete survey is provided in an appendix. We use Qualtrics to present the survey to
participants.
18

4. Findings

4.1 Search strategy

The Scopus database, a platform that combines a comprehensive, expertly curated abstract and
citation database with enriched data and linked scholarly literature across various fields, was the
main resource used for early keyword searches. In the subsequent screening phases (Tab. I), full texts
and abstracts were extracted using additional electronic databases. For example, some papers cannot
be downloaded directly from Scopus, so Scopus offers a link to the official source, such as
ScienceDirect, where the paper can be downloaded.

The screening process applied consists of four phases (Figure 6). All results from the first three
search and screening phases were saved and retained in the Scopus Library. The final included studies
were documented in a separate overview reflecting the characteristics of included studies and reports
on the digital competencies framework in the banking industry, along with the results from screening
the reference lists of included studies. The complete search strategy step is described in section 3.3.1.

I: Identification
Data source Search process documentation
Scopus • Date of search: 15 - 31 July 2022
• Preliminary search by using defined keywords (Tab. II)
• First hit results sorted by relevance based on Scopus algorithms
(i.e., keyword frequency and keywords in the title).
• All screening and search results are saved and retained in Scopus Library
ResearchGate, • Retrieve and review abstracts in accordance with inclusion criteria (Primary screening).
IEEE, • Retrieve and read the full text in accordance with inclusion criteria (Secondary screening).
Semantic Scholar, • Documentation of the completed set of studies
ScienceDirect,
Emerald
Reference lists • Reviewing reference lists of previously included papers (backwards snowballing)
• Locate and retrieve identified papers (Google)
• Evaluate selected papers using inclusion criteria (section 3.3.1).
• Documentation of the final set of included studies

II: Search queries used in order (Primary Screening)


Search Research String Description Records
Query
1 TITLE-ABS-KEY("digital transformation" or "Digitalization" or First Query 156
"Industry 4.0" or "Chief Digital Officer") AND TITLE-ABS-
KEY("competency" or "skill" or "Framework" or "Competency
framework" or "Technical skill" or "Digital skill" or "Digital
competency") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("bank" or "Fintech" or "Banking
industry" or "Retail bank" or "Central bank" or "Commercial bank")
AND PUBYEAR > 2000
2 TITLE-ABS-KEY("digital transformation" or "Digitalization" or Excluded 127
"Industry 4.0" or "Chief Digital Officer") AND TITLE-ABS- records
KEY("competency" or "skill" or "Framework" or "Competency that are not
framework" or "Technical skill" or "Digital skill" or "Digital journals or
competency") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("bank" or "Fintech" or "Banking conference
industry" or "Retail bank" or "Central bank" or "Commercial bank") papers.
AND PUBYEAR > 2000 AND ( LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE,"ar" ) OR LIMIT-TO
( DOCTYPE,"cp" ) ) AND ( EXCLUDE ( SRCTYPE,"k" ) )
3 TITLE-ABS-KEY("digital transformation" or "Digitalization" or Limit the 117
"Industry 4.0" or "Chief Digital Officer") AND TITLE-ABS- record to
KEY("competency" or "skill" or "Framework" or "Competency English
framework" or "Technical skill" or "Digital skill" or "Digital only.
competency") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("bank" or "Fintech" or "Banking
industry" or "Retail bank" or "Central bank" or "Commercial bank")
AND PUBYEAR > 2000 AND ( EXCLUDE ( SRCTYPE,"k" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-
TO ( DOCTYPE,"ar" ) OR LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE,"cp" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO
( LANGUAGE,"English" ) )
4 TITLE-ABS-KEY("digital transformation" or "Digitalization" or Exclude 90
"Industry 4.0" or "Chief Digital Officer") AND TITLE-ABS- industries
KEY("competency" or "skill" or "Framework" or "Competency
19

framework" or "Technical skill" or "Digital skill" or "Digital that are


competency") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("bank" or "Fintech" or "Banking irrelevant.
industry" or "Retail bank" or "Central bank" or "Commercial bank")
AND PUBYEAR > 2000 AND ( EXCLUDE ( SRCTYPE,"k" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-
TO ( DOCTYPE,"ar" ) OR LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE,"cp" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO
( LANGUAGE,"English" ) ) AND ( EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"ENER" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"ENVI" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"MEDI" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"MATH" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"AGRI" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"BIOC" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"EART" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"IMMU" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"PHYS" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"HEAL" ) OR EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"NURS" ) OR
EXCLUDE ( SUBJAREA,"PHAR" ) )

This search strategy returned 156 first results after the initial search. Section 3.3.1 shows the criteria
for deciding which articles would be included in the final list. Then, the results were assessed by
determining whether all employed keywords were identified in the displayed title or text of the search
result. After the initial screening process, 90 studies remained. In the second step of screening, the
abstracts and keywords of the remaining papers were looked at to see how well they fit with the idea
of digital competencies and digital transformation in the banking sector.
Full texts for the remaining 33 papers were obtained, thoroughly read, and checked again for
matching inclusion requirements. In conclusion, 14 studies were found to be eligible.
A secondary search was conducted to improve the systematic literature review's reliability and
prevent missing important material discussing digital transformation and digital skills concepts. In
addition, the reference lists of the 14 publications included in the study were searched, revealing ten
further publications describing digital competencies in the banking sector. Finally, 24 studies were
suitable for data extraction and had data that could be extracted (Tab. I). Figure 8 depicts the entire
screening procedure and the results of the search strategy.

Figure 7 Overview of search process

4.2 Data extraction


All studies from the primary screening were used in the data extraction section to gain insight into
the studies about digital transformation and digital competencies over time.
20

I: Analysis of Keyword Networks


An analysis of the keywords was executed to identify new trends in the field network. We identify
trends after primary screening because we have adequate data to see trends for the keyword that we
selected. For further investigation, “. RIS” and “. CVS” files were exported from the Scopus database
for further analysis. The identified keywords were investigated using the tool VOS viewer to detect
their interconnections (van Eck & Waltman, 2010). We study how the topic appears in publications
over the years and observe the development of the topic and derive new perspectives. The result can
be seen in Figure 8.
The system of linked keywords is represented as a network. The colors point to the clusters in which
most of the group's keywords occur together. The size of the node shows the connection degree of the
keywords. The 14 keywords included 3 clusters. As can be seen, the most occurring keyword is
"fintech." This keyword is also the most related keyword in its cluster, along with the terms "digital
transformation," "banking", "financial innovation", "financial service", and "blockchain." The
second largest node is the keyword "digitalization." The third most occurring keyword is "industry
4.0". The first cluster shows that the research focus of fintech is related to digital transformation,
banking, and financial services (red cluster). The second cluster reveals that customer value and
service quality are related to aspects of digitalization in banking (blue cluster). The third cluster
focuses on the digital economy, technologies, and digitalization (green cluster).

Figure 8 VOS viewer network analysis of keywords (source: created by authors)

According to the keyword analysis, the banking industry is associated with fintech and digital
transformation. Therefore, we will discuss fintech-related skills and competencies in the qualitative
analysis section.

II: The occurrence of articles by year of publication


From 2015 through 2022, many articles on digital transformation were published each year. In 2018,
the number of papers published on digital transformation and competencies increased, with more
than three publications released yearly. The linear trendline is also still going up, which shows that
digital transformation in banking is becoming more critical. Conference proceedings account for 29%
of all papers and journal articles (Fig. 9). The graph (Fig. 10) depicting the articles published over the
years shows the field's emergence. According to Figure 10, the largest number of published papers is
21

6 in 2021, while the lowest is 1 in 2015–2017. In 2022, 4 articles were published, and since this year
has not ended yet, the number of papers that will be out by the end of the year is likely to go up.

8
Conference

Documents
6
Paper
29% 4

2
Article
71% 0
2010 2015 2020 2025
Year

Figure 9 Documents by type (n=24)


Figure 10 Documents by year (n=24)

III: Distribution of papers by country of publication


Furthermore, we list the countries with the largest number of contributions to the topic (Fig. 11 and
12). The United States has contributed the most papers (17%). The United Kingdom, Russia, and
Germany are second with 8% each. These countries are heavily affected by digital banking and fintech
growth. They also have a robust educational and research system and a supportive regulatory
environment for fintech. Even if the interests in digital transformation and digital competencies are
less evident in the United Kingdom, Russia, and Germany, they have a strong infrastructure.

United States
United Kingdom
Russian Federation Countries Contribution (%)
Germany
Italy
United States 17%
Canada
Taiwan United Kingdom 8%
Switzerland
China Russian 8%

Germany 8%
0 2 4 6

Figure 11 Documents by country (n=24) Figure 12 Country classification (n=24)

III: Top five authors on the field by citation number


We also extracted the top five authors in the field based on their citation counts (Table 7). Specifically,
the "Publish or Perish" software displays Scopus database results in order of overall influence and
impact. It considers a variety of metrics, including the total number of citations. The most influential
papers concentrated on digital transformation strategy. They attempted to provide practitioners with
guidelines for dealing with the challenge of digital transformation and how to improve employee
digital competencies in the banking industry.

Authors Publication Cites Cites/year


Matt et al. (2015) Business and information systems Engineering 767 109.57
Hess et al. (2016) MIS Quarterly Executive 520 86.67
Chanias et al. (2019) Strategic Information Systems 152 50.67
Liu et al. (2011) Management Decision 101 9.18
Zavolokina et al. (2016) International Conference on Information Systems 52 8.67

Table 7. Top 5 authors on the field

4.3 Data synthesis and Qualitative analysis

Based on the keyword network analysis in section 4.2, we discovered a link between three important
keywords: Fintech, digital transformation, and banking. Based on these connections, we can see that
"Fintech" is a keyword always associated with digital transformation, as we discovered earlier in the
literature review. In this part, we will provide summaries of how each term is related to the other terms
2

and extract information that can provide an answer to each research question. First, we focus on
characteristics of digital transformation to find information to answer RQ2 and RQ3. Second, we focus
on finding the skills related to Fintech and possible skills that should be included in a DCF for the
banking industry to answer RQ1.

4.3.1 Digital transformation in the banking industry


To understand more about the characteristics of digital transformation in the banking business, we
look for the difference between traditional and digital banking. We found that traditional banking
faces an existential threat, such as adapting to new technology or losing customers to faster and more
agile FinTech competitors. The bank's major business segments in the past have been retail banking,
wholesale banking, and wealth management. Furthermore, some larger banks have business lines
other than the typical three, such as treasury services or insurance. In order to understand how
technology disrupts traditional banks, Temelkov (2020) shares differences between traditional and
digital banks based on each model's focus, distribution channels, and utilization of technology, see
Table 8.

Traditional bank model Digital Bank model


Product-centric Platform-centric
Branches Marketplace community
High verticalization of products High community engagement with the product
No strong communities around the brand/product Horizontalization of products with best-in-class apps
Services are only offered through the branch network Open banking through APIS
High customer acquisition cost Mobile only (low customer acquisition cost)
Technology infrastructure Technology infrastructure
Outsourced technology Open architecture technology stack
Rigid legacy platforms of 1970s–1980s Ability to ‘plug and play’ best-in-class tools/services
Non-modular architecture with limited scalability Low dependency on 3rd party providers
Hard to integrate data from 3rd party providers Open ecosystem allowing access to external developers
Product-Centric business Data-Driven business
Banking data divided into silos Real-time data integration and management
Mix of paper-based and online data Current accounts generate key data for 3rd parties
Difficulties in reconciling, monitoring data Data powers business model through 3rd party
Hard to integrate data from 3rd party providers affiliation fees
Organizational design Organizational design
Product-centric organizational design Customer-centric organizational design
Products and verticals drive organization structure Customer needs drive data architecture

Table 8. Main differences between traditional bank model and digital bank model (Temelkov, 2020)

Traditional banking models incur considerable expenses due to maintaining an extensive network of
branches, as seen by the features presented in the preceding table. On the other hand, the digital bank
model is an online banking model that eliminates the need for costly maintenance and labor
expenditures. Furthermore, traditional banking models have higher customer acquisition costs than
digital banking models. Another distinction is the system enabled by each model. While digital banks
use cutting-edge technology, traditional banks may use obsolete technology or even outsource their
technology. Other significant differences include how each model and organizational architecture
uses data. Digital banks position themselves as customer-centric banks because they use data to
better understand client desires and modify or create new goods and services to meet those needs.
On the other hand, traditional banks lack the ability to examine their data. They are product-driven to
achieve economies of scale and fully leverage their expensive infrastructure and capacities. Aside
from the differences indicated above, there are more that should be noted between traditional
banking models and the other two broad models. For example, traditional banks' credit scoring
models are gradually becoming obsolete due to changes in certain carefully stated factors. In
addition, the development of new data collection and processing tools, among other things, allows
for a comprehensive understanding of client behavior. As a result, technologically advanced banks,
such as digital banks, may take advantage of this technology and tailor their offerings to the demands
of their consumers. Based on the differences in bank business models, digital banks clearly give
considerable benefits over traditional bank business models. This is also one of the reasons why the
bank is becoming digital: old business models cannot compete with new ones.

The banking industry has been significantly disrupted by the fintech industry, which uses
technological developments to provide financial services that traditional banks previously provided.
The interesting aspect is that emerging technology enables institutions to provide financial services
3

with greater efficiency and flexibility. Y. Wang et al. (2021) summarize the fintech into 9 dimensions,
see Table 9. This table gives an overview of fintech in each dimension.

Payment dimension Online payment


Mobile payment
Third party payment
QR code payment
Network payment
Resource allocation dimension Internet loan
Internet lending
Network investment
Online lending
P2P loan
Risk management dimension Internet insurance
Internet financing
Network financing
Online financing
Network insurance
Network channel dimension Mobile banking
Online Banking Service
Internet Banking
E-bank
Big data dimension Big data
Data mining
Big data analysis
Big data application
AI dimension Artificial intelligence
Intelligent robot
Natural language processing
Machine learning
Distributed technology Cloud computing
dimension Cloud platform
Digital currency
Bitcoin
Blockchain Technology
Internet technology dimension Internet of things
Vehicle interconnection
Mobile
Internet 5G
Mobile communication
Security technology dimension Biometrics
Fingerprint identification
Iris Recognition
Face recognition
Voice recognition

Table 9. Fintech dimensions (Y. Wang et al., 2021)

Even though FinTech offers so many chances to provide new services that traditional financial
intermediaries do not, there are still numerous issues to investigate and overcome. The FinTech
challenge in Table 10 that derive from Suryono et al. (2020) assists in understanding how FinTech
transforms the business model of the banking sector, as well as the digital and technological
capabilities necessary to support this transition.

Challenges Issues
Framework and Model Developing a practical and systematic framework for fintech (Haddad & Hornuf, 2019)
Financial literacy Financial literacy should be technology oriented (Hatammimi & Krisnawati, 2018)
Personal data The use of big data and new technologies raises significant data protection issues
protection (Anugerah & Indriani, 2018)
Collaboration Banks need to consider fintech and strategic partnerships (Mehrotra, 2019)
Security Developing a trust-based financial system, including comprehensive and measurable
security mechanisms (Kim & Hong, 2016)
Infrastructure Improve and develop cost efficient infrastructure (cloud computing) (Kumari & Kumar
Sharma, 2017)
Payment systems Standard definitions of mobile payments (including mobile banking, mobile money,
mobile wallets, mobile commerce, and mobile finance) are required (Iman, 2018)
4

Blockchain The blockchain concept (including blockchain structures and payment transactions on
the blockchain) (Milian et al., 2019)
Technology - Rapid developments in artificial intelligence (ai), machine learning, and blockchain
(Cao et al., 2021)
- Development of an optimization algorithm model and asset allocation to predict
trends (Brownsword, 2019)
- Develop integrated knowledge-based and generative models for the ai conversational
robot advisor (Day et al., 2018)
- Need to ensure the quality of the software system at fintech (Jin et al., 2019)
- Technology integration (Lee & Shin, 2018)
- Alternative credit scoring based on non-traditional data (Leong et al., 2017)
- Open Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) (Sybirianska et al., 2018)
- Digital identification and biometrics (Sybirianska et al., 2018)
- The design of big data-based lending markets (Tao et al., 2017)
- Information collection for fraud detection (H. Wang et al., 2019)
Robo-Advisor Banks and other companies in the financial industry must design Robo-advisors
(Belanche et al., 2019)

Table 10. FinTech challenges based on Suryono et al. (2020)

We can see from the above tab that several technologies are connected in FinTech (Big Data,
Blockchain, AI). In the next section, we will learn more about this technology to determine what
digital and technical skills are needed to support DT in the banking industry and to answer the first
research question.

4.3.2 Digital and technical skills for the banking industry


Identifying the digital capabilities that support DT in the banking industry is a relatively new concept.
According to Moro et al. (2015), employees are one of the main groups that aid banks in
transformation. Moro et al. (2015) further emphasize that, to assist DT, the banking industry should
focus on developing digital skills and enhancing staff's fintech technical expertise. As a result, we
want to see which skills get the most attention in the banking and FinTech industries. Therefore,
table 11 include this industry's digital and technical skill descriptions.

Overview of digital skills


Scientific sources Description
Mazurchenko et al. (2022) -Problem solving in a digital environment.
-Advanced analytical and mathematical skills
-Database management skill
-Software development skill
Santoso et al. (2020) -Basic digital skills
-Technological skill competency requires various skills, such as modeling, big
data analysis, statistics, and programming.
Goumeh & Barforoush (2021) Digital skills, expertise, experience, and interest; personnel dedicated to I4.0,
ICT competencies of employees, data empowered decision making, openness to
new technologies, employees have access to digital skills/expertise as needed.
Sia et al. (2021) Digital skills include agile, data analytics, digital business models, digital
communication, digital technologies, journey thinking, and risk and control.
Radović-Marković et al. (2019) IT competencies

Table 11. Overview of digital skills

The overview of digital skills shows that it might be hard to tell digital skills from technical skills
because some scientific sources group all related IT skills into digital skills, and there is no clear
structure to separate digital skills from technical skills. As a result of the literature study, we adopted
the DIGCOMP framework as a baseline for digital skills. However, we discovered some technical skills
that go beyond the DCF in the banking industry. Those technical skills are related to data science
skills. Melnychenko et al. (2020) share that big data, artificial intelligence, biometrics, and
blockchain are digital technologies now widely used in digital banking. Previously, financial
technology tools at the bank were primarily used as software for maintaining accounts, transactions,
and client databases; now, they can be used in virtually all banking processes (Table 12).
5

Area of application Artificial Big data Blockchain


intelligence
Analysis of customer behavior X X
Transaction monitoring X X X
Customer segmentation X X
Customer identification X
Fraud management X X X
Personalization of banking services X X
Risk assessment and regulatory compliance X X
Customer response analysis X X
Process automation X
Providing financial advice X X
Investment decision-making X X X
Trade facilitation X
Syndicated loan services X
P2P transfers X

Table 12. Use of financial technology in digital banking (Melnychenko et al., 2020)

Based on the table, we want to validate whether each technology is relevant to the FinTech
industry. To accomplish this, we broaden our search criteria to ensure that each technology is
relevant to FinTech. We use the same search method. The search string used is: [("Artificial
intelligence" OR " Big data" OR " Blockchain" OR "Chief Digital Officer")] AND ("Bank" OR "Banking
industry" OR "Fintech")]. We look for indications of using technical skills in the banking industry by
evaluating the title and abstract of each item of literature. As a result, we discovered 32 pieces of
literature mentioning these technical skills and their application in the banking industry. Table 13
summarizes all papers we found that support each technical skill and application area in the banking
and fintech industries.

Literature Technical skills Year


- Futures of artificial intelligence through technology readiness levels (Martínez-Plumed et al., 2021) Artificial 2021
- A Review of Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques (Boutaher et al., 2020) intelligence 2020
- Loan approval system through customer segmentation using big data analytics and machine learning 2020
(Vijayalakshmi et al., 2020)
- Towards an Efficient Real-time Approach to Loan Credit Approval Using Deep Learning 2018
(Abakarim et al., 2018)
- Big Data in Asian Central Banks (Cornelli et al., 2022) Big data 2022
- Structure optimization of big data financial industry based on 5g network processor and embedded 2021
system (L. Wang & Chen, 2021)
- Recent applications of big data in finance (Tekaya et al., 2020) 2020
- The Effect of Big Data Analytics on Firm Decision Making: The Case of the Lebanese Banking Sector 2020
(Shouman & Chehade, 2020)
- Big Data Skills Required for Successful Application Implementation in the Banking Sector 2017
(Al-Hakimi, 2017)
- Technology road mapping architecture based on technological learning: Case study of social banking in 2017
Iran (Ghazinoory et al., 2017)
- Expert systems in finance: Smart financial applications in big data environments 2019
(Metawa et al., 2019)
- Big data and IoT: A prime opportunity for banking industry (Boumlik & Bahaj, 2018) 2018
- Big Data Innovation and the Application of Systems Thinking and Standards for Business Resiliency in 2018
the Banking Sector (Herron & Cloete-Hopkins, 2019)
- Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector Blockchain 2021
(Garg et al., 2021)
- Blockchain technology and trust relationships in trade finance (Kowalski et al., 2021) 2021
- Blockchain Technology: Opportunities and Challenges for Small and Large Banks during COVID-19 2021
(DIcuonzo et al., 2021)
- Blockchain for banking systems: Opportunities and challenges (Shorman et al., 2020) 2020
- Corporate banking—risk management, regulatory and reporting framework in India: a Blockchain 2020
application (Dashottar & Srivastava, 2020)
- How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert 2020
interviewees (Chang et al., 2020)
- Digital transformation of the banking system of Russia with the introduction of blockchain 2020
(Afolalu et al., 2020)
- Blockchain technology in financial services: a comprehensive review of the literature 2020
(Milian et al., 2019)
- Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry (Guo & Liang, 2016) 2016
6

- An effective security assessment approach for Internet banking services via deep analysis of multimedia Data science 2020
data (Khattak et al., 2020)
- Identifying suspicious money laundering transaction based on collaborative relational data screening 2020
model using decision classifier in transactional database (Krishnapriya, 2020)
- Financial Technology: Evidence in the European Banking System (Campanella et al., 2020) 2020
- Predicting the daily number of payment transactions in the largest bank in the Netherlands: Application to 2019
Banking Data (Corstjens et al., 2019)
- Credit scoring through data mining approach: A case study of mortgage loan in Indonesia 2019
(Aji & Dhini, 2019)
- Data, Innovation and Competition in Finance: The Case of the Access to Account Rule 2019
(Colangelo & Borgogno, 2019)
- Marketing relations and communication infrastructure development in the banking sector based on big 2019
data mining (Ivanchenko et al., 2019)
- Development of a master data consolidation system model (on the example of the banking sector) 2018
(Prokhorov & Kolesnik, 2018)
- Technical Efficiency Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to the Banking 2016
Sector (Yannick et al., 2016)
- Business intelligence in banking: a literature analysis from 2002 to 2013 using text mining and latent 2015
Dirichlet allocation (Moro et al., 2015)

Table 13 List of literature related to the banking and fintech industries.

Moreover, we investigate the description of each financial technology that may aid in finding
description of technical skills that are appropriate for banking employees.

1) Artificial intelligence (AI): AI refers to a group of technologies that, without additional


programming, can replicate human actions in previously learned technological systems. Machine
learning (ML), a related technological idea, is a set of algorithms that can predict new scenarios when
used with the previously mentioned methods (Buchak et al., 2018; Chakraborty & Joseph, 2017). The
most common uses of AI in banks are customer information support, which involves directing
customers to the right source of information and making the job of bank employees easier; collecting
customer data; using chatbots to handle individual banking transactions, such as opening or closing
an account; providing services based on consumer behavior, which is analyzed by smart programs;
and providing services based on the needs of customers (Melnychenko et al., 2020).
2) Big data: big data technologies in digital banking can solve the issues of business process
optimization and automation, allowing banks to save resources while reducing operational risks
(Melnychenko et al., 2020). Big Data analytics refers to the application of analytical methods to large
amounts of data sets. According to Alexopoulos et al. (2022), big data analytics is progressively being
incorporated into numerous bank departments. They mention that the employees who deal with the
massive amounts of data acquired by CaixaBank from various sources and channels may be classified
into the following groups.
• IT and Big Data expert users: employees and third-party consultants with excellent
programming skills and Big Data analytics knowledge.
• Intermediate users: People with some notion of data analytics that are used to working
with some Big Data tools, especially for visualization and Big Data visual analysis (such
as QlikSense/QlikView). They are not skilled programmers, although they are capable of
programming simple algorithms or functions with Python or R.
• Non-IT users: People with excellent knowledge of the field and sector could interpret the
data but lack programming skills or Big Data analytics knowledge.
Another example from the Development Bank of Singapore Limited (DBS) also shares that bank-wide
upskilling programs are three-fold, namely, to enhance employees’ ability to:
• Use data to address business challenges in a highly structured fashion,
• Use data analytics to identify business opportunities better, and
• Facilitate closer collaboration with the bank’s data scientists and technology teams to
create more intuitive customer products and services.
Paul Cobban, Chief Data and Transformation Officer, DBS Bank, stated that Technology is advancing
rapidly, and we need to ensure our staff have the knowledge, skills, and tools to adapt to change and
build communities with their peers to create a cycle of learning. In addition, empowering our staff
with new technical and soft skills makes them more efficient and productive at work (DBS Newsroom
n.d.).
3) Blockchain: Blockchain is a digital system that enables recording transactions in a
decentralized distributed ledger. It is decentralized since no authority or institution regulates it.
Blockchain technology has the potential to minimize operational and transaction costs as well as
financial inefficiencies. Additionally, established financial institutions are beginning to use this
7

technology in their operations. Furthermore, blockchain technology may be employed in other areas
of the financial sector with some additional uses outside of this sector (Crosby Nachiappan Pradan
Pattanayak Sanjeev Verma & Kalyanaraman, 2016).
4) Data science: Data science is disrupting the banking sector. Banks have vast amounts of data
and leveraging the amounts of data is assisting banks in a variety of ways, including process
automation, process improvements, the exploration of new delivery models and the introduction of
new services. The following examples demonstrate how data science is used in the banking industry.
Corstjens et al. (2019) show that the clearing system's processing time is improved by using the time
series technique to anticipate the daily number of payment transactions. As another example, Aji &
Dhini (2019) show that Support Vector Machines (SVMs) can improve data mining and help evaluate
an applicant’s credit score.
In conclusion, these are examples of technical skills in the industry. Most of the time, Big
Data, AI, and Blockchain are linked to FinTech and skills like programming, data analytics, machine
learning, and distributed ledgers. These should be considered as additional skills that banking
industry employees need to learn to support DT.

4.4 Survey

4.4.1 Data collection


A purposive sample was used to select survey participants (Robinson, 2014). The survey was
distributed to people who have work related to DT in the banking industry. The survey was sent out to
30 participants. The survey was open for 30 days, from August 5 to September 5, 2022. During the
survey period, the system sends reminders to each participant if they do not complete the survey.
As a result, 10 responses came from different countries (Figure 14) and two types of companies
(Figure 15). An example of question 15 is shown below, and the complete survey question is included
in the appendix.

Q15 3.2 What aspects of your organization need to change for a successful digital transformation?

Based on the literature review, the scope of digital transformation in banking currently focuses on changing
or improving the internal structure. Therefore, we would like to investigate what area in your organization
structure is important and impacts the success of digital transformation the most.
Types of Banks
Participant countries

6 5 5

1 1 1 1

Commerical Bank Central Bank

Figure 13 Participant countries Figure 14 Types of Banks

4.4.2 Data analysis


The first question of the survey is a question related to digital competencies. Table 14 displays digital
competence results by mean and level in each competence area. The first column shows the average
mean for each skill, while the third column shows the mean for each competency detail (1: not
important to 5: most important). The fourth column shows the raw score of each level, and the last
column shows the definition of the score range (0–1 is foundation, 1-2 is intermediate, 2-3 is
advanced, and 3–4 is very specialized). The second question of the survey is question related to
technical competencies.

Competence area Description Mean Level Level


(score)
1: Information and 1.1 Browsing, searching, filtering data, information, and digital content 3.90 2.50 Advanced
data literacy 1.2 Evaluating data, information, and digital content 4.40 2.90 Advanced
(Mean: 4.03) 1.3 Managing data, information, and digital content 4.00 2.80 Advanced
2: Communication 2.1 Interacting through digital technologies 4.20 2.60 Advanced
and collaboration 2.2 Sharing thought digital technologies 4.10 2.80 Advanced
(Mean: 4.15) 2.3 Engaging in citizenship through digital technologies 3.90 2.50 Advanced
2.4 Collaborating through digital technologies 4.00 2.70 Advanced
2.5 Netiquette 4.40 2.70 Advanced
2.6 Managing digital identity 4.30 2.70 Advanced
3: Digital content 3.1 Developing digital content. 3.40 2.50 Advanced
creation 3.2 Integrating and re-elaborating digital content 3.30 2.40 Advanced
(Mean: 3.43) 3.3 Copyright and licenses 3.60 2.70 Advanced
3.4 Programming 3.40 2.30 Advanced
4: Safety 4.1 Protecting devices 4.50 3.00 Specialized
(Mean:4.30) 4.2 Protecting personal data and privacy 4.40 3.30 Specialized
4.3 Protecting health and well-being 4.40 2.60 Advanced
4.4 Protecting the environment 4.20 2.60 Advanced
5: Problem solving 5.1 Solving technical problems 3.40 2.80 Advanced
(Mean:3.58) 5.2 Identifying needs and technological responses 3.50 2.80 Advanced
5.3 Creatively using digital technologies 3.70 2.80 Advanced
5.4 Identifying digital competence gaps 3.70 2.70 Advanced

Table 14: Digital competencies

Competence area Rank Description Mean


Data Science 1 Data visualization 4.00
2 Exploratory data analysis 3.90
3 Data cleansing/preparation 3.80
4 Data processing 3.80
5 Data integration 3.70
6 Data modeling 3.70
7 Statistical analysis 3.70
8 Research methods and empirical validation 3.50
9 Machine learning techniques 3.50
10 Data mining 3.40

Table 15: Technical competencies


2

Table 13 shows the top three important digital competencies: safety has a mean of 4.30 with an
advanced level, communication and collaboration has a mean of 4.15 with an advanced level, and
information and data literacy has a mean of 4.03 with an advanced level. Protecting devices and
personal data have the highest mean of 4.50 and 4.40 in the safety competencies, respectively.
Netiquette, managing digital identity, and interacting through digital technologies are the top three
highest means of communication and collaboration, with 4.40, 4.30, and 4.20. Finally, the highest
mean in information and data literacy is 4.40 for evaluating data. Table 15 displays the rank of
technical competencies, and the top four are data science skills: data visualization, exploratory data
analysis, and data cleansing and processing, with 4.00, 3.90, and 3.80, respectively.

The following section is about identifying the preferred business unit in the banking industry that
should have digital competencies and be able to assist an organization's digital transformation. Three
units came out of this question: data analysis (6 answers), IT (3 answers), and corporate service (1
answer).

The last section is the question of the most important structural change for a successful digital
transformation. Table 16 shows the type of structural change and mean. In conclusion, the highest to
the lowest mean rank is as follows: Employee roles and skills, organizational structure, leadership,
and organizational culture each have a score of 4.50, 4.20, 4.10, and 4.00.

Type of structural changes Mean


1. Organizational structure 4.20
2. Organizational culture 4.00
3. Leadership 4.10
4. Employee roles and skills 4.50

Table 16: Type of structural changes


3

5. Discussion
The findings from this research are discussed in this chapter. The chapter describes how the sub-
questions are answered using the results of this research. Furthermore, it describes how, using the
answers to the sub-questions, the main research question can be answered. Moreover, it lays out the
limitations of this research and potential threats to its validity. Finally, it discusses opportunities for
future research.

5.1 Results
This section discusses all the research findings. First, it explains how the study approaches/analyzes
the sub-questions. Second, the answers to the sub-questions are combined to answer to the main
research question.

5.1.1 Digital and Technical Skills


First, RQ1 contains a sub-question that aims to identify the digital and technical competencies in the
banking industry and develop a DCF. The DCF is created in two parts of the process. The first part is a
literature review. In this part, a researcher gathers different definitions of digital and technical
competencies from the academic literature and subsequently uses those definitions to review the
digital competencies framework from the DIGCOMP model. Next, in the second part of the process,
each skill is ranked in a survey, where participants have feedback on how important each skill is and
what knowledge level is required in the banking industry. The outcomes of these two processes
resulted in developing a proposed DCF for the banking industry, which aids in answering RQ1.

The recommended DCF includes three DIGCOMP competence areas (“Safety,” “Communication and
collaboration,” and “Information and data literacy”), each with a mean greater than 4. The other 2
competence areas are from the literature review results in chapter 4, which are “Data Science” and
“FinTech”. We chose these competence areas because the literature review shows that digital
transformation in banking is mostly related to these two competencies. The Data Sciences
competence area contains three primary competencies: "Data visualization," "Exploratory data
analysis," and "Data cleansing and preparation," which are the top four results from the survey. The
FinTech competence area contains three primary competencies: "Artificial intelligence," "Big Data,"
and "Blockchain," which are the keywords that are related to digital transformation in banking.
Based on the DIGCOMP framework (Carretero et al., 2017) and the literature review results, we
describe each competence in detail and give an example of skill in Table 17. As "Data science" and
"FinTech" details are not available in the DIGCOMP framework, we provide the detail of each
competency based on the literature review result in section 4.3.2.

Competence Description Competence Example of skills


area
Safety To protect - Protecting devices - Knows how to adopt a proper cyber-hygiene strategy
devices, - Protecting personal regarding passwords (e.g., selecting strong ones that are
content, data and privacy difficult to guess) and managing them securely (e.g.,
personal data, using a password manager).
and privacy in - Knows how to activate two-factor authentication when
digital it is available (e.g., using one-time passwords, One Time
environments. Password, or codes along with access credentials).
- Knows how to detect suspicious email messages that
contain malware or attempt to obtain sensitive
information (e.g., personal data, banking identification).
- Can respond appropriately to a security breach (i.e., an
incident that results in unauthorized access
to digital data, applications, networks, or devices, or the
leaking of personal data such as logins or passwords)
Communication To interact, - Netiquette - Knows how to stop receiving unwanted disturbing
and communicate, - Managing digital messages or emails.
collaboration and collaborate identity - Knows how to recognize hostile or derogatory messages
through digital - Interacting and sharing or activities online that attack certain individuals or
technologies. through digital groups of individuals (e.g., hate speech).
technologies - Knows how to modify user configurations (e.g., in apps,
software, or digital platforms) to enable, prevent, or
4

moderate the AI system that is tracking, collecting, or


analyzing data (e.g., not allowing a mobile phone to track
the user’s location).
- Knows how to use a variety of videoconferencing
features (e.g., moderating a session, recording audio and
video).
- Able to achieve effective communication in an
asynchronous (non-simultaneous) mode
using digital tools (e.g., for reporting and briefing,
sharing ideas, giving feedback and advice, scheduling
meetings, and communicating milestones).
- Knows how to flag or report disinformation and
misinformation to fact-checking organizations and
social media platforms to stop it from spreading.
Information To articulate - Evaluating and - Carefully considers the top/first search results in both
and data information managing data, text-based and audio searches, as they may reflect
literacy needs and information, and digital commercial and other interests rather than be the most
locate and content appropriate results for the query.
retrieve digital - Knows how to collect digital data using basic tools such
data, as online forms and present them in an accessible way
information, (e.g., using headers in tables).
and content. - Can apply basic statistical procedures to data in a
structured environment (e.g., spreadsheets)
to produce graphs and other visualizations (e.g.,
histograms, bar charts, and pie charts).
- Knows how to interact with dynamic data visualization
and manipulate dynamic graphs of interest (e.g., those
provided by Eurostat and that appear on government
websites).
- Can use data tools (e.g., databases, data mining, and
analysis software) designed to manage and organize
complex information to support decision-making and
solve problems.
Data sciences To understand - Data visualization - Knows how to develop new approaches to risk analysis
how to find - Exploratory data or figure out how to automate the risk management
information in analysis process (risk management).
large, raw, or - Data - Can create and implement high-performance identity
structured data cleansing/preparation verification applications capable of withstanding
sets to identify - Data processing aggressive fraud attacks (fraud detection).
patterns and - Can analyze how customers use products and behave so
gain new that recommendations to improve the customer
insights. experience can be made across all business units
(customer data).
- Knows how to personalize different offers in a way that
matches the needs and preferences of the customer
(customer segmentation).
- Understands how to use data science tools and
techniques to analyze data (e.g., Tableau, Hadoop, time
series, R, and Python)
FinTech To - Artificial intelligence - Understands how AI can provide businesses with
fundamentally - Big data valuable insights into consumer behavior and spending
understand - Blockchain habits.
software, - Learns how big data analytics can help companies
mobile predict changes in the market and create new, data-
applications, driven business strategies.
and other -Understands how blockchain technology enables
technologies decentralized transactions without the involvement of a
designed to third party; can use a network of blockchain participants
improve and to monitor potential changes or additions to encrypted
automate data.
traditional
forms of
business
finance.

Table 17: Recommended digital competencies framework for the banking industry.
5

5.1.2 Structural Changes in the Banking Industry


The second and third research questions explore the structural changes and organizational
units that are involved in the process of digital transformation. This research focuses on structural
changes in the banking industry that are influenced by digital transformation. A structural change is
one that involves a change to a company's organizational structure, particularly the placement of new
digital activities inside corporate structures. This assessment is also crucial in determining whether
the changes primarily affect products, procedures, or skills. For example, suppose that the structural
changes in a particular situation are relatively minor. In that case, it may be more appropriate to
integrate the new operations resulting from the change within existing corporate structures. In
contrast, where the changes are more significant, it may be appropriate to establish a separate
subsidiary inside the organization. There are four dimensions that define structural changes:
organizational structure, organizational culture, leadership and employee roles, and skills. These
dimensions will aid businesses in assessing their current capabilities and developing a digital
transformation strategy. The result of RQ3 is intended to provide an overview of structural change. At
an absolute minimum, an organization's digital transformation strategy should be able to consider
these four factors.
This paper creates and validates an overview of type of structural changes in three steps. The
first step is a literature review of papers that offer a definition of the concept of structural change and
examine its dimensions. This definition of structural change is the starting point for the second step.
During this step, each dimension is ranked by participants in the survey. Based on these rankings and
the second literature review, a final rank for each dimension was created in table 18. The definition of
structural change is based on research from Vial (2019).

Dimension Description
1. Employee roles and Digital transformations are often accompanied by changes in skill sets required for a
skills transformation and subsequent routine operations. While present employees may
have a different, less tech-savvy perspective and may lack the technological
capabilities to deal with future changes, new, highly skilled, and focused people may
be challenging to find. As a result, an employee should evaluate their present digital
skills and procedures to weigh their current skills and drive the design of training
procedures for current employees and new hires.
2. Organizational Structures and operations in digital banks should be reorganized around the
structure consumer. In doing so, banks can quickly react to digital innovations while
managing organizational transformation. Change in an organization begins at the
top, and support for customer-focused digital banking must be pervasive,
reinforced, and monitored.
3. Leadership Digital transformation is a continuous, complex endeavor that has the potential to
influence an organization and its operations significantly. As a result, it is critical to
assign proper and clear roles for developing and implementing a digital
transformation strategy. If a digital transformation strategy is poorly planned,
businesses may lose their scope and face operational challenges. As a result,
businesses should ensure that the individual who is operationally accountable for
the digital transformation strategy has appropriate experience in transformative
projects and that their incentives are directly aligned with the strategy's aims and
progress. There is no simple answer to who should be in control of a digital
transformation strategy. Potential candidates include dedicated business
transformation managers or individuals who hold the relatively new job of chief
digital officer (CDO), in addition to chief information officers (CIOs) and CEOs. In
any event, because many transformative processes unfold over an extended period,
it would be ideal if this person remained the same throughout that process.
4. Organizational Culture is always a factor in large transformation programs, and digital ones are no
culture exception. Nevertheless, it is well worth the effort; successfully navigating digital
cultural shifts is a competitive differentiator for banks. Competitors find it
challenging to replicate other businesses’ strong customer focus and to develop new
ideas and act quickly.

Table 18: Rank of structural changes for the banking industry.

5.1.3 Answering the Main Question


Throughout these questions, the digital competencies framework (DCF) has been introduced. The
primary research question is: "What do (Chief) Digital Officers in banking industry perceive as the
most important digital and technical skills for the banking industry?" The existing DIGCOMP
framework partially answers this question. The remaining research questions support tailoring the
6

framework to the characteristics of the banking industry. According to the SLR and the survey results,
digital competencies are important for the banking industry to prepare for digital transformation.

5.2 Validity

There are potential challenges with respect to the validity of this research. To analyze validity, the
author used the model from Wohlin et al. (2012). To summarize, this book discusses four types of
validity: construct validity, internal validity, external validity, and conclusion validity. Each type of
validity has issues that could impair the research's validity. This section discusses this study’s
potential validity threats. Figure 15 depicts an overview of each validity threat and identifies where it
appears in the research. The specifics of each threat type are discussed in the following paragraphs in
this section.

Figure 15: Validity Threats (Wohlin et al., 2012)

5.2.1 Internal Validity


To improve the internal validity of this study, we used method triangulation. Thyer (2019) notes that
methods triangulation uses diverse research methods to examine the data (i.e., combining
quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study). Triangulation is also helpful for enhancing
credibility and validity. The intention is to decrease the deficiencies and biases of any single method.
In this study, triangulation helps you get a complete understanding of your research problem, as we
use a literature review and a survey to help us understand the research problem.

The threat to internal validity is a lack of completeness in the literature review. As Brereton et al.
(Brereton et al., 2007) note, one of the most common validity threats with respect to literature
reviews is the use of incomplete or inappropriate search terms. This threat is present in this research
as the author is not an expert on the topic, and the literature review was conducted during the initial
phases of the research, which could have resulted in the use of inaccurate search terms. In addition, it
is possible that the list of search terms was incomplete. Therefore, despite being conducted
systematically, the literature review may not be exhaustive. During the search of the literature, the
author reviewed preliminary publications on the topic to develop an understanding of the
terminology, which assisted in establishing relevant search terms for the literature review.
Furthermore, the search terms were adjusted during the study.

5.2.2 External Validity


The second validity threat described by Wohlin et al. (2012) is to a study’s external validity. This
threat is concerned specifically with the generalizability of the research. For example, one threat
could be having a sample group of interviewees that is not representative of the overall population.
The main threat is the representative sampling that may occur during a survey. In sample-based
research, in making statistical inferences about and interpreting the results, one typically needs to go
7

beyond the sample to the study population (i.e., the population described by the sampling frame).
According to Andrade (2021), generalization is possible only among those in the population from
which the sample was drawn and those in the population who possess the characteristics of the
sample under study. To reduce the threat of this problem, the author selected a study group whose
members were familiar with the banking industry and involved in digital transformation. The
participants in the study group hailed from commercial and central banks and had more than five
years of experience and involvement in managerial roles. However, this does not completely obviate
the threat stemming from representative sampling because the study group members did not come
from all regions of the world. Consequently, the study group may not be representative of the entire
industry.

5.2.3 Construct Validity


A third validity threat is construct validity (Wohlin et al., 2012), which relates to how well-defined the
research is. For example, for construct validity to be present, research must include clear definitions
and be capable of unambiguous application. A lack of construct validity can harm the repeatability of
the research, as unclear definitions can lead to different outcomes when applied by different
researchers. In this research, if a participant misunderstood the definition of the term ‘digital
competencies’, that participant’s score was not considered. According to Wieringa, there is a
potential for construct validity threats during the literature review regarding the definition of the
term “digital competencies” (Wieringa, 2014). In this research, we clearly define terms related to
digital transformation, competencies, and skills in the survey. This definition can help the participant
understand each term before answering the survey. In the information sheet, we also provide
guidelines for the survey and recommend that participants understand the terms before taking the
survey.
With respect to the definitions of technical skills, there are many such definitions that need to be
clearly defined and described for future research. During the literature review, the author found clear
definitions in each skill and application area used in FinTech industries. The results from literature
review reduced the threat that the definition of each technical skill would be misunderstood.
However, this did not entirely remove the threat. Not all the skills in the research have precise
definitions. This means that the author constructed definitions for these skills. Because the inputs for
these definitions were sometimes limited, this could have resulted in the creation of inaccurate or
partial definitions. Due to the limited availability of resources to address this threat, it had to be
accepted.

5.3 Limitations
This study has a number of limitations. Although these constraints do not inherently reduce the
quality of the research, there are aspects of the study that, in hindsight, could have been done better
or more efficiently.

The first limitation affects many researchers. This study would have benefited from the participation
of more specialists in digital transformation in the banking industry. Seven of the respondents in this
study can be considered digital transformation specialists. The other responses were from subject
matter experts (i.e., individuals who are familiar with digital competencies). The small number of
respondents made it difficult to broaden the range of digital skills or units that are relevant to DCF.
However, due to the limited availability of DCF in general and the time allotted for this research, a
greater number of participants could not be recruited.

A second limitation pertains to the structural change topic. It would have been beneficial to conduct
interviews with CDOs in the industry. This would have provided further evidence or more validity to a
recommendation that organization should follow as well as provided an example of how they can
develop strategies for that purpose. Therefore, the generalizability of the results of this research are
limited.

A third limitation is the lack of exposure to the actual value of implementing DCF in the banking
industry. As a result, the specific research topic for this study focuses on the concept of DCF rather
than how to implement it in the organization. However, the framework should be used as a starting
point for traditional banks to construct DCFs that are appropriate for their business and their stage in
the digital transformation process.
8

5.4 Future studies


While this paper has developed the fundamental aspects of the digital competencies framework, there
are at least three possible areas for additional research.

5.4.1 Digital Competencies Framework


The review of digital skills presented earlier in this paper took technical skills into account.
However, some technical skills may not be included in the DCF due to other FinTech technologies still
developing and may require additional technical skills to facilitate the technologies. As a result,
researchers should continue investigating the FinTech challenge and related skills to aid in the
development of the DCF over time. Another thing to consider for future research is that the survey
used in this study specifically sampled people who were directly involved in digital transformation
and worked in a commercial or central bank. People who work in FinTech or who are support
employees, such as office managers and finance leads, were omitted from the participant pool. By
using a larger sample group in future studies, scholars may identify additional skills that are
currently absent from the framework and should be included. In future research, DCF could be used to
measure the current level of digital and technical skills in the banking industry.

5.4.2 Digital Transformation Strategies


Structural change describes the fundamental aspects of a digital transformation using four
dimensions. Future research should identify other common aspects of digital transformation that are
linked to these four dimensions. Empirical insights could aid in comparing digital transformation
plans across firms to analyze similarities and differences and thus improve success rates.

5.4.3 Training and Development Strategies


Finally, researchers might use a DCF to create organizational training and development initiatives.
According to our findings, there is little research on practical strategies that assist businesses in
acquiring digital and technical skills and ensuring they have the capabilities required to enable a
digital transformation. So, a researcher could look into training strategies that use a DCF as a
framework for employee development and how to use these strategies in an organization to help
employees develop skill sets based on a DCF.
9

6. Conclusion
This research intends to describe a theoretical framework for digital transformation and develop a
DCF that is suitable for the banking industry. The research has resulted in several conclusions about
DCF. These findings are summarized in this chapter with reference to the research questions.

The goal of this research was to answer three main questions:

1. What do (Chief) Digital Officers in banking industry perceive as the most important digital and
technical skills for the banking industry?

This study aimed to answer this broad question by developing a framework that explains each skill.
The sub-questions explored different aspects of digital and technical skills. An extensive systematic
literature review was used to find suitable skills for a DCF. These skills were then ranked through
surveys by participants who work in fields that are involved in digital transformation processes in
banks. As a result, we created a DCF, as shown in 5.1.1. The DCF can be used to determine which skills a
bank should prioritize to prepare for digital transformation. These surveys yielded a set of skills that
were added to the framework. Finally, we present our research findings in the form of figures. Figure
16 illustrates DCF's five key digital competencies for the banking industry.

Figure 16 DCF's five key digital competencies for the banking industry (source: created by authors)

2. What is the most critical business unit that should use the digital competencies framework to
support structural change?

According to the findings of this study, one should use the DCF to focus on three main units: the data
analytics unit, the IT unit, and the corporate services unit. The literature review showed that
transformation events in digital banks or FinTech are typically associated with new technologies.
These new technologies are data science-related and used to engage with data analytics or IT units,
depending on the organizational structure. As a result, the business unit survey participants
mentioned most frequently in their responses was the data analytics unit, which comports with the
findings from the literature review. However, because the organizational structures of different
organizations may differ, this business unit may not be the only one that should be prioritized.

3. What structural change is most important to ensure that a digital transformation is successful?

According to this study's findings, the most significant structural changes are the employee roles and
skills dimension. As demonstrated by the literature review, digital transformations in the banking
industry have altered several aspects of the industry. The literature review usually mentions two
dimensions, technology, and data, which change how traditional businesses operate. On the other
hand, employees may lack the technological capabilities to deal with these changes. As a result, one of
the critical elements that organizations must consider to ensure a successful transformation is
employees.
10

In conclusion, we proposed a digital competencies framework that should support the banking
industry during digital transformation. In addition, this framework could be used to measure
professionals' digital and technical skills and to analyze the effectiveness of employee development
strategies regarding digital skills. Furthermore, the business unit related to data is the critical
business unit that an organization should focus on to improve the digital competencies of the
employees in the unit. Finally, the FinTech organization consistently invests in new financial
technologies to improve overall business performance. However, our findings suggest that the
FinTech organization should consider organizational structure before investing in new technologies.
An organization must ensure that its employees have the knowledge, skills, and tools to adapt to
changes in a new business process that may affect new technologies.
11

References
Abakarim, Y., Lahby, M., & Attioui, A. (2018). Towards An Efficient Real-time Approach to Loan Credit
Approval Using Deep Learning. 9th International Symposium on Signal, Image, Video and
Communications, ISIVC 2018 - Proceedings, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIVC.2018.8709173
Afolalu, S. A., Babaremu, K. O., Ongbali, S. O., Golubev, A., Ryabov, O., & Zolotarev, A. (2020). Digital
transformation of the banking system of Russia with the introduction of blockchain and
artificial intelligence technologies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
940(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/940/1/012041
Aji, N. A., & Dhini, A. (2019). Credit scoring through data mining approach: A case study of mortgage
loan in Indonesia. 2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management,
ICSSSM 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887731
Al-Hakimi, A. A. A. (2017). Big data skills required for successful application implementation in the
banking sector. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 752, 381–392.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6502-6_34
Alexopoulos, A., Becerra, Y., Boehm, O., Bravos, G., Chatzigiannakis, V., Cugnasco, C., Demetriou, G.,
Eleftheriou, I., Fodor, L., Fotis, S., Ioannidis, S., Jakovetic, D., Kallipolitis, L., Katusic, V., Kavakli,
E., Kopanaki, D., Leventis, C., Marcos, M. M., Martin De Pozuelo, R., … Vasiliadis, · G. (2022). Big
Data Analytics in the Banking Sector: Guidelines and Lessons Learned from the CaixaBank Case.
Technologies and Applications for Big Data Value, 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
78307-5_13
Ananiadou, K., Claro, M., & Magdalean Claro, O. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New
Millennium Learners in OECD Countries DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION 21ST CENTURY SKILLS AND
COMPETENCES FOR NEW MILLENNIUM LEARNERS IN OECD COUNTRIES EDU Working paper no. 41.
https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Andrade, C. (2021). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal
of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
Anugerah, D. P., & Indriani, M. (2018). Data Protection in Financial Technology Services: Indonesian
Legal Perspective. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1), 012188.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012188
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding
robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(7),
1411–1430. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368/FULL/PDF
Boumlik, A., & Bahaj, M. (2018). Big data and IoT: A prime opportunity for banking industry. In Lecture
Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69137-4_35
Boutaher, N., Elomri, A., Abghour, N., Moussaid, K., & Rida, M. (2020). A Review of Credit Card Fraud
Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of 2020 5th International Conference
on Cloud Computing and Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications, CloudTech 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUDTECH49835.2020.9365916
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying
the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of
Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSS.2006.07.009
Brownsword, R. (2019). Regulatory Fitness: Fintech, Funny Money, and Smart Contracts. European
Business Organization Law Review 2019 20:1, 20(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40804-019-
00134-2
Buchak, G., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2018). Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of
shadow banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(3), 453–483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.011
Campanella, F., Serino, L., Battisti, E., Christofi, M., & Giakoumelou, A. (2020). Financial Technology:
Evidence in the European Banking System. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology
Management, Operations and Decisions, ICTMOD 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380589
Cao, L., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2021). Data science and AI in FinTech: an overview. International Journal
of Data Science and Analytics, 12(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41060-021-00278-
W/TABLES/1
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. In
Publications Office of the European Union (Issue May). https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
Chakraborty, C., & Joseph, A. (2017). Machine Learning at Central Banks. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3031796
12

Chang, V., Baudier, P., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, J., & Arami, M. (2020). How Blockchain can impact
financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166
Chanias, S., Myers, M. D., & Hess, T. (2019). Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital
organizations: The case of a financial services provider. The Journal of Strategic Information
Systems, 28(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSIS.2018.11.003
Colangelo, G., & Borgogno, O. (2019). Data, Innovation and Transatlantic Competition in Finance: The
Case of the Access to Account Rule. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3251584
Cornelli, G., Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Tissot, B. (2022). Big Data in Asian Central Banks. Asian
Economic Policy Review, 17(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEPR.12376
Corstjens, M., Bakhshandeh, M., Kahraman, P., & Bosman, J. (2019). Predicting the daily number of
payment transactions in the largest bank in the Netherlands: Application to Banking Data.
Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2019, 5507–5512.
https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005538
Council of the European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council
of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European
Union, 49(December 2006), 10–18. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32006H0962
Crosby Nachiappan Pradan Pattanayak Sanjeev Verma, M., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). BlockChain
Technology: Beyond Bitcoin.
Dashottar, S., & Srivastava, V. (2020). Corporate banking—risk management, regulatory and
reporting framework in India: a Blockchain application-based approach. Journal of Banking
Regulation 2020 22:1, 22(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41261-020-00127-Z
Day, M.-Y., Lin, J.-T., & Chen, Y.-C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence for Conversational Robo-Advisor;
Artificial Intelligence for Conversational Robo-Advisor. https://doi.org/10.5555/3382225
DBS equips employees with skills to become everyday ‘Data Heroes.’ (n.d.). Retrieved September 8, 2022,
from
https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_equips_employees_with_skills_to_become_everyday
_Data_Heroes
DIcuonzo, G., Donofrio, F., Fusco, A., & Dell’Atti, V. (2021). Blockchain Technology: Opportunities and
Challenges for Small and Large Banks During COVID-19.
Https://Doi.Org/10.1142/S0219877021400010, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021400010
Diener, F., & Špaček, M. (2021). Digital Transformation in Banking: A Managerial Perspective on
Barriers to Change. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 2032, 13(4), 2032.
https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042032
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management
Review, 41(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165987
Ferrari, A. (2013). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Joint Research Centre of
the European Commission., 91. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116
Frame, W. S., & White, L. J. (2004). Empirical Studies of Financial Innovation: Lots of Talk, Little
Action? Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 116–144.
https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558065
Garg, P., Gupta, B., Chauhan, A. K., Sivarajah, U., Gupta, S., & Modgil, S. (2021). Measuring the
perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120407
Garth, A., Surabhi, K., & Richa, W. (2016). Digital transformation in financial services A report from the
Deloitte Center for Financial Services. www.deloittedigital.com.
Ghazinoory, S., Dastranj, N., Saghafi, F., Kulshreshtha, A., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2017). Technology
roadmapping architecture based on technological learning: Case study of social banking in Iran.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 231–242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.018
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
Goumeh, F., & Barforoush, A. A. (2021). A Digital Maturity Model for digital banking revolution for
Iranian banks. 26th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran, CSICC 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CSICC52343.2021.9420566
Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. In Financial
Innovation (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 1–12). SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0034-9
Haddad, C., & Hornuf, L. (2019). The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and
technological determinants. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 81–105.
13

https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-018-9991-X/TABLES/8
Hatammimi, J., & Krisnawati, A. (2018). Financial literacy for entrepreneur in the industry 4.0 era: A
conceptual framework in Indonesia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 183–187.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3285957.3285985
Herron, C. J., & Cloete-Hopkins, N. (2019). Big Data Innovation and the Application of Systems
Thinking and Standards for Business Resiliency in the Banking Sector. In Lecture Notes in
Electrical Engineering (Vol. 561). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18240-3_35
Hess, T., Benlian, A., Matt, C., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation
strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123–139.
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
85011959099&partnerID=40&md5=6fb58c898148e5fa1970287aa0174399
Iman, N. (2018). Is mobile payment still relevant in the fintech era? Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications, 30, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELERAP.2018.05.009
Ivanchenko, O. V., Mirgorodskaya, O. N., Baraulya, E. V., & Putilina, T. I. (2019). Marketing relations
and communication infrastructure development in the banking sector based on big data mining.
International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7, 176–184.
Jin, T., Wang, Q., Xu, L., Pan, C., Dou, L., Qian, H., He, L., & Xie, T. (2019). FinExpert: Domain-specific
test generation for FinTech systems. ESEC/FSE 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint
Meeting European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software
Engineering, 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338906.3340441
Kane, G. C. (2019). Digital Disruption Is A People Problem. MIT Sloan Management Review, 8–11.
https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/digital-disruption-is-a-people-problem/
Khattak, S., Jan, S., Ahmad, I., Wadud, Z., & Khan, F. Q. (2020). An effective security assessment
approach for Internet banking services via deep analysis of multimedia data. Multimedia
Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-020-00680-7
Kim, K., & Hong, S. (2016). The Data Processing Approach for Preserving Personal Data in FinTech-
Driven Paradigm. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 10(10), 341–350.
https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2016.10.10.30
Kitchenham Barbara, and S. C. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in
software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE.
Kowalski, M., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2021). Blockchain technology and trust relationships in
trade finance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120641
Krishnapriya, G. (2020). Identifying suspicious money laundering transaction based on collaborative
relational data screening model using decision classifier in transactional database. Journal of
Critical Reviews, 7(4), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.04.50
Krstić, N., & Tešić, D. (2016). Digital disruption of the banking industry: Threat or opportunity?
Bankarstvo, 45(2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.5937/bankarstvo1602012k
Kumari, A., & Kumar Sharma, A. (2017). Infrastructure financing and development: A bibliometric
review. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 16, 49–65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCIP.2016.11.005
Lanzolla, G., & Anderson, J. (2008). Digital transformation. Business Strategy Review, 19(2), 72–76.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2008.00539.x
Leaver, M., & Reader, T. W. (2016). Human Factors in Financial Trading. Human Factors: The Journal of
the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(6), 814–832.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644872
Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and
challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2017.09.003
Leong, C., Tan, B., Xiao, X., Tan, F. T. C., & Sun, Y. (2017). Nurturing a FinTech ecosystem: The case of
a youth microloan startup in China. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 92–
97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2016.11.006
Liu, D.-Y., Chen, S.-W., & Chou, T.-C. (2011). Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned
from the CBC Bank global e-banking project. Management Decision, 49(10), 1728–1742.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183852
Loonam, J., Eaves, S., Kumar, V., & Parry, G. (2018). Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned
from traditional organizations. Strategic Change, 27(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2185
Machkour, B., & Abriane, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 and its implications for the financial sector. Procedia
Computer Science, 177, 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.10.068
Markowitsch, J., Kollinger, I., Warmerdam, J., Moerel, H., Konrad, J., Burell, C., & Guile, D. (2002).
Competence and human resource development in multinational companies in three European
Union Member States : a comparative analysis between Austria, The Netherlands and the United
14

Kingdom. In Cedefop Panorama series. Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities.
Martínez-Plumed, F., Gómez, E., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2021). Futures of artificial intelligence
through technology readiness levels. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101525.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101525
Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information
Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
Mazurchenko, A., Zelenka, M., & Maršíková, K. (2022). DEMAND FOR EMPLOYEES’ DIGITAL SKILLS
IN THE CONTEXT OF BANKING 4.0. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 25(2), 41–58.
https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2022-2-003
Mehrotra, A. (2019). Financial Inclusion Through FinTech - A Case of Lost Focus. 2019 International
Conference on Automation, Computational and Technology Management, ICACTM 2019, 103–107.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTM.2019.8776857
Melnychenko, S., Volosovych, S., & Baraniuk, Y. (2020). DOMINANT IDEAS OF FINANCIAL
TECHNOLOGIES IN DIGITAL BANKING. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 92.
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-92-99
Metawa, N., Elhoseny, M., Hassanien, A. E., & Hassan, M. K. (2019). Expert systems in finance: Smart
financial applications in big data environments. In Expert Systems in Finance: Smart Financial
Applications in Big Data Environments. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429024061
Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Investigating the data science skill gap: An empirical analysis. IEEE
Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, April-2019, 1275–1284.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725066
Milian, E. Z., Spinola, M. de M., & Carvalho, M. M. d. (2019). Fintechs: A literature review and research
agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100833.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELERAP.2019.100833
Momani, A. M., Jamous, M. M., & Hilles, S. M. S. (2018). Technology Acceptance Theories. In
Technology Adoption and Social Issues (pp. 1–16). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-
5225-5201-7.ch001
Moro, S., Cortez, P., & Rita, P. (2015). Business intelligence in banking: A literature analysis from 2002
to 2013 using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3),
1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.024
OECD. (2019). Digital disruption in financial markets. 1–28.
http://www.oecd.org.proxy.library.uu.nl/daf/competition/digital-disruption-in-financial-
markets.htm
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2012). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information
Systems Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
Pennings, S. M. J., & Harianto, J. M. (1992). The diffusion of technological innovation in the
commercial banking industry. In Strategic Management Journal (Vol. 13, Issue 1).
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486609
Pinzone, M., Fantini, P., Perini, S., Garavaglia, S., Taisch, M., & Miragliotta, G. (2017). Jobs and skills
in industry 4.0: An exploratory research. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication
Technology, 513, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_33
Posnaya, E. A., Vorobyova, I. G., Sokolova, E. M., & Leonova, M. P. (2017). The role of human factors in
the bank capital evaluation framework. European Research Studies Journal, 20(1), 148–154.
https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/604
Prokhorov, I., & Kolesnik, N. (2018). Development of a master data consolidation system model (on
the example of the banking sector). Procedia Computer Science, 145, 412–417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.093
Punie, Y., Brečko, B., & Ferrari, A. (2014). DIGCOMP: a Framework for Developing and Understanding
Digital Competence in Europe. Http://Www.Openeducationeuropa.Eu/Nl/Elearning_papers, No.38,
3–17.
Radović-Marković, M., Tomaš-Miskin, S., & Marković, D. (2019). Digitalization and agility of
enterprises and banks: It competencies of managers and virtual team members. International
Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(4).
Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive Sampling. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
(pp. 5243–5245). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Rychen, D., & Salganik, L. (2003). Key Competencies for A Successful Life and Well-functioning
Society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Santoso, W., Sitorus, P. M., Batunanggar, S., Krisanti, F. T., Anggadwita, G., & Alamsyah, A. (2020).
Talent mapping: a strategic approach toward digitalization initiatives in the banking and
15

financial technology (FinTech) industry in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy
Management, 12(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2020-0075
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard economic studies, vol. XLVI.
Harvard Economic Studies, 34, 255.
https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674879904
Shorman, A., Sabri, K., Abushariah, M., & Qaimari, M. (2020). BLOCKCHAIN FOR BANKING SYSTEMS:
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES.
Shouman, L., & Chehade, J. (2020). The Effect of Big Data Analytics on Firm Decision Making: The
Case of the Lebanese Banking Sector. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol.
395). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64642-4_6
Sia, S. K., Weill, P., & Zhang, N. (2021). Designing a Future-Ready Enterprise: The Digital
Transformation of DBS Bank. California Management Review, 63(3), 35–57.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125621992583
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of
organizations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 327–334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048
Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and trends of financial technology
(Fintech): A systematic literature review. In Information (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 12, pp. 1–
20). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590
Sybirianska, Y., Dyba, M., Britchenko, I., Ivashchenko, A., Vasylyshen, Y., & Polishchuk, Y. (2018).
Fintech platforms in sme’s financing: eu experience and ways of their application in Ukraine.
Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(3), 83–96.
https://doi.org/10.21511/IMFI.15(3).2018.07
Tao, Q., Dong, Y., & Lin, Z. (2017). Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer
lending platform. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 425–441.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10796-017-9751-5/TABLES/7
Tekaya, B., Feki, S. E., Tekaya, T., & Masri, H. (2020). Recent applications of big data in finance. ACM
International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3423603.3424056
Temelkov, Z. (2020). OVERVIEW OF NEOBANKS MODEL AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRADITIONAL
BANKING. Challenges of Tourism and Business Logistics in the 21st Century, 3(1), 156–165.
https://doi.org/10.46763/YFNTS2031156T
Thyer, B. A. (2019). The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods. In The Handbook of Social Work
Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544364902
Valdani, E., & Arbore, A. (2013). Competitive Strategies. In Competitive Strategies. Palgrave Macmillan
UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354586
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for
bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-009-
0146-3
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2018). 21st-century digital
skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical
validation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2184–2200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.006
Varshney, D. (2020). Digital Transformation and Creation of an Agile Workforce: Exploring Company
Initiatives and Employee Attitudes. Contemporary Global Issues in Human Resource Management,
89–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-392-220201009
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Journal of
Strategic Information Systems (Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 118–144). Elsevier B.V.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Vijayalakshmi, M., Gupta, S. S., & Gupta, A. (2020). Loan approval system through customer
segmentation using big data analytics and machine learning. International Journal of Advanced
Science and Technology, 29(6), 2374–2380.
Wang, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhou, J. (2019). Information collection for fraud detection in P2P
financial market. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1910.02009
Wang, L., & Chen, J. (2021). Structure optimization of big data financial industry based on 5g network
processor and embedded system. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.103938
Wang, Y., Xiuping, S., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Can fintech improve the efficiency of commercial banks? —
An analysis based on big data. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2020.101338
Westerman, G., & Bonnet, D. (2015). Revamping your business through digital transformation. MIT
Sloan Management Review, 56(3), 2–5.
16

Wewege, L., & Thomsett, M. C. (2019). The digital banking revolution: How fintech companies are
transforming the retail banking industry through disruptive financial innovation. In The Digital
Banking Revolution: How Fintech Companies are Transforming the Retail Banking Industry Through
Disruptive Financial Innovation. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781547401598
Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Design science methodology: For information systems and software
engineering. Design Science Methodology: For Information Systems and Software Engineering, 1–
332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8/COVER
Wohlin, C. (2007). An analysis of the most cited articles in software engineering journals - 2000.
Information and Software Technology, 49(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2006.08.004
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Hst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wessln, A. (2012). Experimentation in
Software Engineering. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. In Journal of
Planning Education and Research (Vol. 39, Issue 1, pp. 93–112). SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los
Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yannick, G. Z. S., Hongzhong, Z., & Thierry, B. (2016). Technical Efficiency Assessment Using Data
Envelopment Analysis: An Application to the Banking Sector of Côte D’Ivoire. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.015
Youn, S., Chyung, Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-Based Survey Design:
The Use of a Midpoint on the Likert Scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23.
https://doi.org/10.1002/PFI.21727
Zavolokina, L., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2016). FinTech - What’s in a name? 2016 International
Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016.
17

List of TABLES
TABLE 1. DIGITAL COMPETENCE FRAMEWORK 2.1 ............................................................................................................ 11
TABLE 2. PROFICIENCY LEVELS ........................................................................................................................................ 11
TABLE 3. THE AUTHORS, METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS FOR DIGITAL SKILLS THEORY BACKGROUND ................................. 12
TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH METHODS .................................................................................................................. 15
TABLE 5. SEARCH TERMS AND KEYWORDS ....................................................................................................................... 16
TABLE 6. SURVEY STRUCTURE .........................................................................................................................................17
TABLE 7. TOP 5 AUTHORS ON THE FIELD ......................................................................................................................... 21
TABLE 8. MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADITIONAL BANK MODEL AND DIGITAL BANK MODEL ....................................... 2
TABLE 9. FINTECH DIMENSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 3
TABLE 10. FINTECH CHALLENGES .................................................................................................................................... 4
TABLE 11. OVERVIEW OF DIGITAL SKILLS ........................................................................................................................... 4
TABLE 12. USE OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY IN DIGITAL BANKING ...................................................................................... 5
TABLE 13 LIST OF LITERATURE RELATED TO THE BANKING AND FINTECH INDUSTRIES. ...................................................... 6
TABLE 14: DIGITAL COMPETENCIES.......................................................................................................................................1
TABLE 15: TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES ..................................................................................................................................1
TABLE 16: TYPE OF STRUCTURAL CHANGES ........................................................................................................................... 2
TABLE 17: RECOMMENDED DIGITAL COMPETENCIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE BANKING INDUSTRY. ................................................ 4
TABLE 18: RANK OF STRUCTURAL CHANGES FOR THE BANKING INDUSTRY. ............................................................................... 5

List of FIGURES
FIGURE 1 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................. 7
FIGURE 2 BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE DT PROCESS .................................................................................................................... 8
FIGURE 3 DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION MODEL .......................................................................................................................... 8
FIGURE 4 THE OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH PROCESS....................................................................................................................... 14
FIGURE 5 PROTOCOL OF SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................................... 15
FIGURE 6 EXAMPLE OF LITERATURE SEARCH AND EVALUATION FOR INCLUSION. .......................................................................... 17
FIGURE 7 OVERVIEW OF SEARCH PROCESS ................................................................................................................................... 19
FIGURE 8 VOS VIEWER NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KEYWORDS ......................................................................................................... 20
FIGURE 9 DOCUMENTS BY TYPE ................................................................................................................................................. 21
FIGURE 10 DOCUMENTS BY YEAR ............................................................................................................................................... 21
FIGURE 11 DOCUMENTS BY COUNTRY ......................................................................................................................................... 21
FIGURE 12 COUNTRY CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................................................................................ 21
FIGURE 13 PARTICIPANT COUNTRIES ............................................................................................................................................ 1
FIGURE 14 TYPES OF BANKS ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
FIGURE 15: VALIDITY THREATS .................................................................................................................................................... 6
FIGURE 16 DCF'S FIVE KEY DIGITAL COMPETENCIES FOR THE BANKING INDUSTRY ......................................................................... 9
18

Appendix

Appendix A: Survey

Start of Block: Consent form

Consent form INFORMATION SHEET FOR PARTICIPATION IN RESEARCH STUDY


Develop a competencies framework for digital transformation in the banking industry.

Panithan Phongphaew, student in the Master of Business Informatics (University Utrecht)


Version August 2022

What is the purpose of this research?


We are conducting a research study because we are trying to explore the current state of competency frameworks
for digital transformation and how digital competencies affect the digital transformation in the banking industry.

What do I have to do when I participate in this research?


If you accept to participate in this study, you will be required to complete a three-part questionnaire. The first and
second sections are concerned with identifying critical competencies that can aid in digital transformation
operations. The third section focuses on identifying digital transformation features in the banking industry. Most
of the questions are rating questions, while others require short words. An overview of the questionnaire is shown
as follows.
1. Digital competencies
2. Technical competencies
3. Characteristic of digital transformation organization in the banking industry
4. Contact information

How long does it take to participate in the research?


The study should take about 30 minutes to complete.

Are there any risks involved in my participation in the research?


Your participation is voluntary, which means you can choose not to participate. There will be no negative
consequences if you decide not to participate or change your mind later after you begin the study. You can
withdraw your participation at any time prior to submitting your survey. If you change your mind later while
answering the survey, you may simply exit the survey. Once you submit your responses online, I will be unable to
remove your data later from the study because all submissions are anonymous, and I will not know which survey
response belongs to you.

Is the information about me and my participation in this research confidential?


Research data collected from you will be anonymous. Since your information is collected online in an anonymous
way, we will not be able to link your responses back to you. So, your responses will remain confidential.
The files in which the results are stored are accessible to Panithan Phongphaew (Master student at Utrecht
University) and Johan Jeuring (Professor at Utrecht University). Any publications based on this research do not
contain any information with which you can be identified. The project's research records may be reviewed by
Utrecht University departments responsible for regulatory and research supervision.

What are my rights when I participate in this research?


Your participation in this research is voluntary. You are not paid to participate. You can choose not to participate.
If you agree to participate, you can withdraw your participation at any time without incurring any consequences.
In that case, your answers to the questionnaires will no longer be included in the study.

How do I obtain information about the results of the research?


If you want to obtain information about the results of this research, you can send an email to Panithan
Phongphaew ([email protected]). Since we do not store any information about participants, we
cannot send this to all participants, unless they make themselves knows to us.

Whom can I contact if I have questions about this research?


If you have any questions or remarks about this research, or if you are concerned about particular aspects about
the research, you can contact Panithan Phongphaew ([email protected])
19

Do you have any privacy-related complaints or questions as a result of this research? Then you can send an email
to the data protection officer of Utrecht University ([email protected]).

o I consent (1)

o I do not consent (2)

End of Block: Consent form

Start of Block: Framework introduction

Part 1 :Introduction Part 1: Digital skill


Based on the below competency table, please rate the importance of each skill in part 1 that is crucial for
supporting digital transformation.

For example, we are starting to witness a post-COVID boom in digital solutions, platforms, products and services,
which further amplifies the need for digital business processes and a digitally skilled workforce. People’s digital
skills can be broadly categorized as basic, intermediate, and advanced. Basic digital skills relate to basic
manipulation of digital devices, email communication, web search and online transactions; while intermediate
skills relate to professional use of business software and data management. Advanced skills relate to data analysis,
software development and high-level computing competences in the range of emerging technologies such as
artificial intelligence and machine learning.

More information: DigComp framework

End of Block: Framework introduction

Start of Block: Competence 1: Information and data literacy

Q1 1. Information and data literacy

Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely


important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

1.1 Browsing, searching, filtering data, information,


and digital content ()

1.2 Evaluating data, information, and digital content


()

1.3 Managing data, information, and digital content


()

Q2 What level should employees have for this skill?


Foundational Intermediate Advanced Highly
Specialized

1 2 3 4
20

1.1 Browsing, searching, filtering data, information,


and digital content ()

1.2 Evaluating data, information, and digital content


()

1.3 Managing data, information, and digital content


()

End of Block: Competence 1: Information and data literacy

Start of Block: Competence 2: Communication and collaboration

Q3 2. Communication and collaboration

Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely


important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

2.1 Interacting through digital technologies ()

2.2 Sharing through digital technologies ()

2.3 Engaging in citizenship through digital


technologies ()

2.4 Collaborating through digital technologies ()

2.5 Netiquette ()

2.6 Managing digital identity ()

Q4 What level should employees have for this skill?


Foundational Intermediate Advanced Highly
Specialized

1 2 3 4

2.1 Interacting through digital technologies ()

2.2 Sharing through digital technologies ()

2.3 Engaging in citizenship through digital


technologies ()

2.4 Collaborating through digital technologies ()

2.5 Netiquette ()

2.6 Managing digital identity ()


21

End of Block: Competence 2: Communication and collaboration

Start of Block: Competence 3: Digital content creation

Q5 3. Digital content creation


Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

3.1 Developing digital content ()

3.2 Integrating and re-elaborating digital content ()

3.3 Copyright and licenses ()

3.4 Programming ()

Q6 What level should employees have for this skill?


Foundational Intermediate Advanced Highly
Specialized

1 2 3 4
3.1 Developing digital content ()

3.2 Integrating and re-elaborating digital content ()

3.3 Copyright and licenses ()

3.4 Programming ()

End of Block: Competence 3: Digital content creation

Start of Block: Competence 4: Safety

Q7 4. Safety
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5
22

4.1 Protecting devices ()

4.2 Protecting personal data and privacy ()

4.3 Protecting health and well-being ()

4.4 Protecting the environment ()

Q8 What level should employees have for this skill?


Foundational Intermediate Advanced Highly
Specialized

1 2 3 4

4.1 Protecting devices ()

4.2 Protecting personal data and privacy ()

4.3 Protecting health and well-being ()

4.4 Protecting the environment ()

End of Block: Competence 4: Safety

Start of Block: Competence 5: Problem solving

Q9 5. Problem solving
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

5.1 Solving technical problems ()

5.2 Identifying needs and technological responses ()

5.3 Creatively using digital technologies ()

5.4 Identifying digital competence gaps ()

Q10 What level should employees have for this skill?


Foundational Intermediate Advanced Highly
Specialized

1 2 3 4
23

5.1 Solving technical problems ()

5.2 Identifying needs and technological responses ()

5.3 Creatively using digital technologies ()

5.4 Identifying digital competence gaps ()

End of Block: Competence 5: Problem solving

Start of Block: Part 2

Q11 Part 2: Technical skill


What are important technical skills for banking industry?

This part plans to find the essential data science skill required to support digital transformation in the industry. Based on
the literature review, the researcher found the ten most important technical skills to support digital transformation.
Therefore, we would like to see the level of importance in each skill and example of related work or task.
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

1. Exploratory data analysis ()

2. Data visualization ()

3. Machine learning techniques ()

4. Data mining ()

5. Data cleansing/preparation ()

6. Research methods and empirical validation ()

7. Data processing ()

8. Statistical analysis ()

9. Data integration ()

10. Data modeling ()

Q12 (Optional) Please provide an example of a task for this skill.

o ${Q11/ChoiceGroup/ChoiceWithHighestValue} (1)
__________________________________________________
24

Q13 3.1 What business unit is required to practice the digital competencies framework to cope with structural
changes arising from digital transformation?

________________________________________________________________

Q14 Please rank the relevance level of this business unit toward digital transformation.
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
important important important important important

1 2 3 4 5

${Q13/EnteredText} ()

Q15 3.2 What aspects of your organization need to change for a successful digital transformation?

Based on the literature review, the scope of digital transformation in banking currently focuses on changing or improving
the internal structure. Therefore, we would like to investigate what area in your organization structure is important and
impacts the success of digital transformation the most.

Strongly Somewhat Neither Somewhat Strongly


disagree disagree agree nor agree agree
disagree

1 2 3 4 5

1. Organizational structure ()

2. Organizational culture ()

3. Leadership ()

4. Employee roles and skills ()

Q16 (Optional) Please describe the reason why you give this score.

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

End of Block: Part 3


25

Start of Block: Contact information

Q19 Please provide your information

o Name: (1) __________________________________________________

o Organization: (2) __________________________________________________

o Position: (3) __________________________________________________

o Country: (4) __________________________________________________

Q20 (Optional) Please provide your contact information

o Contact information (1)


__________________________________________________

End of Block: Contact information

You might also like