Example Concert Progamming
Example Concert Progamming
Pieces Performed:
Skills Addressed:
- Perform 4.2 - Analyze: Analyze the structure and context of varied musical works and
their implications for performance
- Perform 4.3 - Interpret: Develop personal interpretations that consider creators’ intent.
- Perform 6.1 - Present: Perform expressively, with appropriate interpretation and
technical accuracy, and in a manner appropriate to the audience and context
- Respond 7.2 - Analyze: Analyze how the structure and context of varied musical works
inform the response
- Respond 8.1 - Interpret: Support an interpretation of a musical work that reflects the
creators’/performers’ expressive intent
- Respond 9.1 - Evaluate: Support personal evaluation of musical works and
performance(s) based on analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
- Connect 11.0 - Relate Musical Ideas: Relate musical ideas and works with varied context
to deepen understanding.
S, H, C, NS Addressed:
Styles/Genres Ballad
Ragtime
Cultures Celtic
Netherlands/German influence
Celtic Air and Dances is an engaging piece for flex band that will allow students to play
traditional Celtic folk songs. It features two traditional Celtic folk tunes called “The Parting
Glass”, which includes a woodwind feature and a full chorale section, and then “Tha Mi Sgith (A
Fairy’s Love Song) in an uptempo arrangement featuring rhythmic percussion. One main reason
I chose this piece is for the opportunity it provides to teach students about the musical form AB
and how to identify themes and perform them in such a way that makes them musically
distinct. The piece provides a great opportunity to teach students a new style of music with the
Celtic folk songs. This fits well into our concert theme of “folk songs”, which is an educational
opportunity to learn about folk songs in our culture and in other cultures. The other main
reason is that it provides an opportunity to talk about who has the melody in a given section
and how to bring that out. Because it is a flex arrangement, different instruments can have the
melody that do not typically get to and it will work no matter the instrumentation of the group.
It also features some dotted rhythms, which we will be learning with Ammerland, and is in a
new key (G minor).
Activity:
Assessment Type:
Rubric
Examples of possible assessment:
I would use a checklist with 2 categories of 1: rhythmic accuracy and 2: accuracy of note
shape/drawing. There would be 4 columns. The fourth column would be “no mistakes”,
the third “one mistake”, the second “two mistakes”, and the first “more than 2
mistakes”. Then, I would leave room to write comments at the bottom so that if I can
tell that a student is almost there but they’re just missing one key concept, I can tell
them that or at least describe why they got something wrong.
The purpose of this task is for me to be able to see how well students have understood
dotted rhythms after learning about them in class so I can see what I still need to review
or reteach for them. For example, if all students are able to write the dotted quarter
rhythm but not the dotted sixteenth rhythm, then I need to review just that. This could
almost be assessed with a simple checklist of whether or not they have the aural and
dictation skills, but I think there are multiple levels of understanding that a student
could have (ex: they understand the concept but just made a mistake in writing it out,
they understand how to play a dotted rhythm but not how to write it, they know how to
write it but don’t understand how it fits into the structure of a measure or how many
beats it takes up, etc.), so I want to be able to assess and give comments on these
different level of understanding.