Vocational Scenario in Other Countries
Vocational Scenario in Other Countries
The assignment submit on brief outline description of Vocational and Training scenario in
Japan and UK two countries and Comparison with Indian Vocation Education and Training
System.
Background:-
In Japan, parents and students traditionally place higher value on academic education
compared to vocational education. Hence, vocational education is often considered a second
option after university for students with lower grades and/or students from lower socio-
economic backgrounds. Since the 1980s, the number of universities in Japan has grown
dramatically, to almost 800. Enrolments have grown over that period, but many universities
(particularly private institutions and those in regional areas) now face serious financial and
demographic pressures. More recently, due to changes in industry and in the skills required
for work, vocational education and training institutions, especially the specialized courses at
professional training colleges (“senmongakko”) have been gaining in popularity.
Enrolments in these courses are now growing after a period of continuous decline.
Vocational schools are attracting not only senior secondary school graduates but also
university graduates who were not successful in securing employment upon graduation. At
the same time, Japanese companies are making significant changes to their operations. In
2014-15 for the first time, Japanese listed companies made more of their profits offshore
than domestically. Companies have also reduced funding for in-house training programs and
are looking to do more externally. Japanese vocational schools are now also attracting more
international students. In 2014, about 16% of the total number of students studying at
vocational schools were from overseas, mainly from the Asian region. The number of VET
students from Japan studying in Australia is now also increasing again after a period of
decline – this mirrors the broader trend in the number of Japanese students heading
overseas. As the VET system, especially professional training colleges (which are not
“ichijo-ko”1), does not currently have an established quality assurance framework, these
schools often do not receive appropriate valuation from society. In addition, pathways from
vocational schools to universities are still not well developed. Only 2% of Japanese
university entrants are aged over 25 (compared to the OECD average of 18%). The barriers
Responsibility for the provision and supervision of Japan’s VET sector mostly rests
with two ministries – the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology
(MEXT) and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (WHLW). MEXT has responsibility for
general comprehensive school education, which includes some vocational schools such as
colleges of technology, and specialized upper secondary schools. MHLW is principally
responsible for public vocational training and the administration of trade skill and
qualification tests. In addition, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) offers
career education in the school and higher education sectors to improve students’ job
readiness.
2. Vocational and practical professional courses certified by MEXT As a trial to set up a new
framework for vocational education, the MEXT Minister now certifies new vocational
courses which are practical and are offered in cooperation with industry. In August 2014,
470 schools and 1365 courses were registered under the new rules.
3. Super Professional High (SPH) Schools MEXT already provides funding for Super Science
High Schools (to focus on STEM education) and Super Global High Schools (to focus on
internationalization and study abroad). The SPH school project was launched in 2015, and
the government is providing special funding for 3-5 years to 16 specialized upper secondary
schools offering advanced courses in agriculture, technology, commerce, fisheries, domestic
science, nursing and welfare. In 2016, 24 schools will be nominated as Super Professional
High Schools. SPH schools work closely with universities, colleges of technology, research
institutes and industry to “deliver practical vocational education in order to develop job-
ready professionals for further industry development” for Japan.
Background:-
Improving economic and individual prosperity, equality of opportunity and building
communities are key ambitions for the UK. TVET has assumed increased importance as a
catalyst to meet these agendas, and has been at the forefront of policy making in the nations
and regions. TVET in the UK forges the knowledge, skills and behaviors that enable
employment and social mobility. TVET is also vital in supporting businesses to innovate and
grow and plays an integral role in sustainable economic development. This happens at
national, regional and local level and is hardwired into many other ambitions such as Global
Britain and the Industrial Strategy. UK TVET is also a central part of Building Back Better from
Covid-19, responding to industrial and social change and tackling climate change. It is a
priority in every corner of all four UK nations. A summary of key objectives for the sector
include:
Promoting higher level technical qualifications and training.
Supporting lifelong training and retraining opportunities to meet the needs of
employees and employers for years to come.
High quality training that meets current and emerging industry skills needs.
Qualification Framework:-
The Credit and Qualifications Framework for Wales (CQFW) is used for all
qualifications in Wales. Qualifications Wales was established in 2015 as an
independent agency tasked with the effective management of the CQFW.
The Regulated Qualifications Framework (RQF) is used in England and Northern
Ireland. The RQF is regulated by of equal in England and the Council for the
Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) in Northern Ireland.
The Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) has a credit and unit-based
structure.
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, England also have different inspection and
regulatory bodies for the regulation of qualifications and provision in their TVET sectors.
Can be both for profit or not for profit, including working in the voluntary sector.
Deliver government funded training especially to provide ‘off-the-job’ training;
including for apprentices.
Also deliver non-government funded training, including non-accredited bespoke
training.
Tend to be smaller than FE colleges so may deliver more niche or technically specialist
provision. FE colleges will often sub-contract ITP’s and work in partnership with them.
Larger ITPs will provide training opportunities across the country in a range of
vocational training areas.
Partner with employers who want to access external expertise to help them manage
their training. This includes organizing ‘on the job’ training provided by the employer
in the workplace.
Degree Apprenticeships:-
Apprenticeship:-
Awarding bodies:-
Our Training Pattern, Methods, Qualities are far better to other countries. This is
the special reasons that our Indians are working foreign to their Vocational Skills.
WAY FORWARD :-
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 heralds the potentially explosive growth of
vocational education in the country since it requires all educational institutions to integrate
vocational education into their offerings. This will bring in a very large number of schools, colleges
and universities into the fold of potential Vocational Education and Training (VET) providers during
the coming decade and making VET available to millions of students.
The various challenges to VET and action to be taken to address the challenges include the
following:
Challenges Action
➢ Overcoming social status hierarchy ➢ Organization of awareness programmes to change
Associated with vocational education. the general perception and attitude towards
vocational education.
➢ Vocational exposure to children from GradeVI
onwards in all secondary and higher secondary
schools.
➢ Information, education and communication (IEC)
and media campaigns.
➢ Integrating new age skills, 21st century ➢Integrating employability skills at all stages of
skills and entrepreneurship education school education.
in schools. ➢Integrating new technologies in VET for preparing
students for Industry 4.0.
➢Introducing vocational courses on new and
emerging skill demands of the industry, such as
Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Internet of
Things(IoT) will be introduced and enterprise
education will be promoted from Grade 6 onwards.
➢Developing and implementing a holistic ➢ Conduct interest assessment and aptitude test to
assessment and evaluation system. measure special abilities or readiness for learning
in various vocational areas.
➢Measuring the achievement of learning outcomes
through various tools and methods, such as
checklist, group work, peer assessment,
worksheets, presentations, student portfolio, etc.,
for 360-degree assessment and evaluation of
students.
➢Fostering vertical mobility of vocational ➢The courses under National Skills Qualifications
students. Framework (NSQF) or National Higher Education
Qualifications Framework (NHEQF) shall provide for
vertical mobility to the students with vocational
subjects at school level.
Conclusion:-
The use of learning outcomes in describing the content and profile of VET qualifications
opens up opportunities for applying methodologies for analysing and comparing
qualifications that contribute to improving the relevance of VET qualifications and
supporting transferability of VET qualifications. The study showed that VET
qualifications described in terms of learning outcomes can be analysed and compared
across profiles, sectors and countries, and that analyses and comparisons can even be
conducted on the intended and acquired learning outcomes. Learning outcomes are
central to this as they allow for a breakdown of qualifications that can be systematically
applied and analyzed in different (national VET) contexts; furthermore, learning
outcomes descriptions allow for the analysis and better understanding of the content of
qualifications, their orientations in relation to labour market access or further learning.
The comparative approaches that use learning outcomes as a basis allow to reflect on the
content and orientations of VET qualifications in different contexts and thereby offer
insights that can be used to improve the relevance of VET qualifications. Furthermore,
learning-outcomes-based methodologies for analyzing and comparing VET qualifications
allow multiple stakeholders to increase their engagement in review and renewal
processes of VET qualifications, and allow for using the outcomes of this exercise in other
processes such as (career) guidance to VET students/ graduates, supporting
transnational mobility of qualifications and labour mobility.