Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Historical Perspective
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Metal oxide nanoparticles and its hybrids are deemed to be one of the most attractive materials in an
6 May 2020 extensive range of applications due to their impressive optical, electronic, photocatalytic, and biological prop-
Available online 16 May 2020 erties. Metal oxide based nanomaterials with extraordinary characteristics have been proposed, prepared, and
used as main materials in the recent area of photocatalysis and biomedicine, due to their non-toxic nature,
Keywords:
large specific surface area, useful optical bandgap, and high biological activity. Herein, this review reveals
Metal oxide nanoparticles
Nanohybrids
the recent advance development in the area like photocatalytic, anticancer and antibacterial performance of
Photocatalysis metal oxide nanomaterials for multidimensional applications. Consequently, we also focused on the encoun-
Antibacterial activity tered difficulties and prospects for the future application of metal oxide-based composites as promising can-
Anticancer activity didates for the development of highly efficient photocatalytic and biomedical systems. This review article
Biomedical applications also delivers advanced knowledge to the scientific community who intends to design efficient photocatalytic
and biomedical systems.
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Introduction of nanoparticles and its hybrids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Why nanocomposites? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Types of nanocomposites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.1. Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.2. Metallic Matrix Composites (MMC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.3. Polymeric Matrix Composites (PMC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Synthesis strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Physical properties and applications of metal oxides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Physical properties of CdO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.1. Importance of CdO nanomaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Physical properties and applications of MgO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2.1. Importance of MgO nanomaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Physical properties and applications of NiO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3.1. Importance of NiO nanomaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4. Physical properties and applications of ZnO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4.1. Importance of ZnO nanomaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Metal oxide nanoparticles and its hybrids for various applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. Water pollution and its remediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
⁎ Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. Radhika), [email protected] (K.R. Reddy), [email protected] (A.V. Raghu).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102178
0001-8686/© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178 3
1.3.1. Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC) To overcome all these inadequacies, wet chemical methods like
Ceramic-matrix composites are fabricated of fibres or particles em- chemical-precipitation of metal ions may be assuring substitute. The es-
bedding in a ceramic matrix. The reinforcements in the ceramic matri- sential solid-state reactions ensue more quickly and at lessen tempera-
ces comprise of carbon, glass-ceramics, glasses, non-oxides, and tures. As a result, the preferred product can be found with small particle
oxides. The foremost purpose of the ceramic matrix is to maintain the size and higher reactivity.
reinforcing phase in the preferred orientation or location. The combina- Numerous chemical routes are obtainable for the preparation of
tion of high strength nanofibres into ceramic matrices results in mixed metal oxide nanostructures. Ceria doped nanomaterials have
obtaining nanocomposites with greater toughness. They are non- been stated to be fabricated by different wet chemical methods, such
brittle refractory materials designed for diverse applications in several as chemical-precipitation process [5,13,14,32], ultrasound synthesis [7,
fields. 33-], hydrothermal method [35–37], sol-gel method [38,39],
microwave-assisted- method [4,12,40], salt-assisted aerosol decompo-
1.3.2. Metallic Matrix Composites (MMC) sition process, spray pyrolysis technique [41,42], refluxing synthesis
Metallic matrix nanocomposites are made up of ductile metal or [43]. Further, it has been described that the addition of dopants shows
alloy matrix. Metal matrix nanocomposites comprise of at least two high oxide ion conductivity and co-doping process has been employed
chemically and physically distinct phases. These materials contain in current years and was shown to be successful [5,32,40]. Co-doping
both metal and ceramic characteristics that result in ductility and in- with proper ratio of metal ions can effectively advance the ionic conduc-
creased hardness together with the greater strength and modulus. tivity of rare earth-based metal oxides [1,3,4]. Up to now, there is a lot of
Metal-matrix nanocomposites are suitable for making materials of investigation has been done on the preparation of rare-earth based and
higher strength. transition metal-based ceramic composite powders via co-doping
method. Among the different methods stated, chemical-precipitation
1.3.3. Polymeric Matrix Composites (PMC) process is an effortless and talented process to yield homogeneous
Polymeric matrix composite comprises an organic polymer as ma- and small-sized powders [1,5].
trix and fibres or particles as reinforcement phases. Nanoscale reinforce-
ments lead to the acquisition of special properties such as mechanical 3. Physical properties and applications of metal oxides
[30]. For example, the strength and modulus of fibres are much greater
compared to the matrix material. This causes fibres to be the main 3.1. Physical properties of CdO
load-bearing component in the composite. However, there are matrix
materials with effective adhesion properties that tightly bind the fibres Among various metal oxides, cadmium oxide (CdO) is a transparent
together. In the same condition, the matrix materials homogeneously conducting oxide [20,22]. CdO possesses an elevated transmission coef-
deliver the applied load and transfer it to the fibre. Polymers have ficient in the visible light spectrum. Its optical bandgap varies from 2.2–
been compacted with numerous inorganic compounds any natural or 2.7 eV and the oxide has high exciton binding energy (75 meV) [44].
synthetic to raise their heat or influence resistance, mechanical CdO belongs to the n-type degenerated semiconductors. Its n-type con-
strength, flame retardancy and decrease the electrical conductivity ductivity is ascribed to the non-stoichiometric composition of Cd and
and gas permeability [30]. oxygen because of the negative oxygen vacancies (OV) and cadmium in-
terstitial (Cdi) atoms [20]. CdO has a rock salt (NaCl) crystal structure
2. Synthesis strategies (FCC), a widely dispersed S-like conduction band and a little carrier ef-
fective mass (0.11 m0) [44,45]. CdO does not undergo any phase transi-
There are two approaches available to prepare nanomaterials. Me- tion to pressure as high as 83 GPa [44].
chanical grinding has belonged to top-down approach and the
bottom-up mainly comprises of generation of colloidal dispersion by 3.1.1. Importance of CdO nanomaterials
wet chemical route. It is opted to achieve narrow size distribution of When compared with other toxic semiconductor nanoparticles
nanoparticles and this process concerns a material build-up from the (HgO, PbO), CdO nanomaterials demonstrate the lowest toxicity [45].
bottom-most: cluster-by-cluster, molecule-by-molecule by and atom- Nowadays, most of the multivitamin tablets and dietary supplements
by-atom. About the synthesis of colloidal metallic nanoparticles from comprise cadmium [46]. Furthermore, CdO is present in numerous cos-
their starting materials, numerous chemical reduction methods, com- metics and anti-tan creams [47]. Therefore, CdO can be regarded as a
prising the usage of chemical reductants in aqueous as well as non- chemically well-matched with the body moiety [47]. Furthermore, it is
aqueous solvents, sonochemical method [31] and photochemical a suitable choice for biomedical applications because of its excellent op-
method have been usually considered for various intentions of the ap- tical features like fluorescence and high resolution [45,48].
plication. The wet chemical route to synthesize metal colloids fre- Due to the rare optical, chemical, photoelectrochemical, and electri-
quently depends on the suitable metal salt reduction, using stabilizing cal properties listed in Table 1, CdO nanoparticles are in the focus of
materials. The preparation of metal oxide nanomaterials employing ir- many researchers and scientists. It has been demonstrated that many
radiation is now famous and the mechanism is sensibly comprehended. of the heavy metals including cadmium, can destroy cancer cells at min-
Thermodynamically very much stable due to its Spherical shape and it is imum concentrations [49]. The key mechanism of CdO nanoparticles
more feasible in any wet chemical preparation. Since the optical fea-
tures of metal cluster nanomaterials are delicate to shape, size and ele-
mental proportion, it is of significance to develop a method that Table 1
produces non-spherical nanostructures. Anisotropic metallic nanostruc- Physical characteristics of CdO.
tures have been prepared with the help of the structure-regulating
Stable structure at 300 K Cubic
agent, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) [5,32].
The solid-state reaction is the method (diffusion controlled) com- Bandgap 2.2–2.7 eV
Electron carrier mobility 142 cm2 V−1 s−1
monly requires replicated stirring and extended heating at high temper-
Refractive index 2.49
atures to produce a homogeneous and single-phase material [13,14,32]. Density 8.150 g cm−3
The mechanical grinding process will very likely initiate contaminants Melting point 1500 °C
from abrasive materials. Furthermore, lengthy calcination encourages Electron effective mass 0.11 m0⁎
crystallite growth, which is of no use in the construction of dense fine- Exciton binding energy 75 meV
grained ceramics, which certainly possess superior electrical properties. ⁎ m0 - rest mass of the electron.
K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178 5
some other heavy metals like Cu and Co, also have anti-cancer charac- Stable structure at 300 K Cubic
teristics. The thought-provoking fact about the anticancer features of Bandgap 3.6–4.0 eV
CdO nanostructures is that they are not harmful to human and mamma- Refractive index 2.82
lian cells. Density 6.67 g cm−3
Because of these interesting characteristics, CdO nanoparticles have Melting point 1900 °C
Neel temperature (TN) 523 K
been extensively utilized in different industrial applications. The crea-
Dielectric constant 10.31
tion of CdO nanoparticles is the same as that of other nanomaterials Exciton binding energy 50 meV
but its important activation is via to be the destruction of cell wall
[44,45].
Bandgap 3.37 eV
Stable structure at 300 K Cubic
Density 5.61 g cm−3
Bandgap 7.8 eV Refractive index 2.01
Refractive index 1.74 Thermal conductivity 0.6–1.2 W cm−1 K−1
Density 3.58 g cm−3 Specific heat capacity (Cp) 40.3 J mol−1 K−1
Melting point 2852 °C Melting point 1975 °C
Thermal conductivity 0.3–0.6 Wcm−1 K−1 Electron effective mass 0.24 m0⁎
Specific heat capacity 37.2 J mol−1 K−1
⁎ m0 - rest mass of the electron.
6 K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178
4.2. Semiconductor photocatalysis Generally, inorganic nanoparticles can interact with microorganisms
acting as a good antibacterial and antifungal agent. Though, before using
Semiconductor photocatalysis has gained much interest throughout microorganisms as a means of transport for bioactive molecules, such as
the past 30 years as an assuring solution for both energy production and nanoparticles or drugs linked to nanoparticles, it is necessary to examine
ecological issues. Subsequently, widespread works have been carried how to incorporate these molecules within microorganisms. It has al-
out to yield hydrogen from splitting of water molecules by applying a ready been demonstrated how gram-negative bacteria can be employed
variety of semiconductor photocatalysts. Currently, scientists and engi- for constructing bacterial ghosts, signifying the latest advances in deliv-
neers gained much attention in heterogeneous photocatalysis that has ery and pointing vehicles appropriate for the distribution of hydrophobic
been also concentrated on ecological uses like as air and water purifica- or water-soluble drugs. Also, in pathogenic fungi like Candida albicans,
tion by eliminating pollutants. Numerous researches focus on numerous components related to the cell wall, have been recognized to
photocatalysis in current literature. In this, electron-hole pairs are intro- participate in a key role in fungal–host interactions [73,74].
duced after the excitation of bandgap. The general mechanism for Danish scientist Hans Christian Gram has developed a technique to
photocatalysis of nanomaterial showed Fig. 1. distinguish two types of bacteria based on the structure of their cell
walls (Fig. 2). The bacteria that contain the crystal violet dye because
þ
Photocatalyst ðhνÞ eCB − þ hVB of a thick layer of peptidoglycan (PG) and do not hold PG (red or pink
color) are called Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria re-
The excited electron-hole pairs can combine again, liberating the spectively. Gram-negative bacteria are more defiant against antibodies
input energy as heat, without any chemical change. The oxidation and re- because of their impenetrable cell wall compared with Gram-positive
duction steps are the essential mechanisms of photocatalytic water/air bacteria. E. coli, Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, have usually been
K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178 7
Table 5
Photocatalytic activity of metal oxide nanoparticles/composites against different dyes.
Photocatalytic materials Synthesis method Model of dye pollutant Irradiation source Performance (%) Ref.
chosen for examinations because the virulent strain produces food poi- strains (foodborne pathogens). The strength of nanoparticles is diverse
soning, urinary tract infection and neonatal meningitis [75]. between 50 & 100 μg/mL.
The gram-negative bacterial cell wall is structurally and chemically The antibacterial mechanism of the synthesized nanoparticles based
more complex. The outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria fre- on the subsequent features [81–83],
quently provides confrontation to hydrophobic species comprising de-
I. Creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
tergents and holds as an exclusive component, lipopolysaccharide,
II. Heavy metal ions release
that increases the negative charge of cell membranes and is vital for
structural integrity and viability of the bacteria [76–80].
Karthik et al. have stated the photogeneration of ROS on the metal
oxide nanocomposite surface. Usually, the antibacterial performance
5.2. Antibacterial activity of nanoparticles mostly varies upon the specific surface area, ROS and size of particles,
etc. Few nanocomposites are providing ROS via the Fenton reaction
Generally, the antibacterial performance of nanocomposites is ac- directing to DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation can
complished using gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacterial destroy bacteria without damaging nonbacterial cells.
There are other possible mechanisms included in the antibacterial
performance. Prepared nanocomposite obstructs the bacterial cell wall
membrane and binds with mesosome. These intracellular functional
modifications are initiated by the oxidative stress influenced by ROS
leading to cell death as shown in Fig. 3.
M2+ is freed from the surface of nanocomposite and communication
with the membrane of cell wall of the microbe. The cell wall (negative
charge) and M2+ (positive charge) are equally enticed and they reason
denaturation of proteins that outcomes in loss of reproduction capabil-
ity of the DNA thus leading the demise of the pathogen.
þ
MO þ hυ⟶e− þ h
þ
h þ H2 O⟶˙OH þ Hþ
Fig. 2. The Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cell wall structure (Source: https://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram-negative_bacteria). Fig. 3. Antibacterial activity mechanisms of nanohybrids.
8 K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178
Table 6
Antibacterial performance of metal oxide nanoparticles and its hybrids against different human pathogens.
Materials Method of synthesis Tested bacteria Concentration (μg/mL) Zone of inhibition (mm) Reference
N-doped graphene quantum dots (GQDs) Hydrothermal synthesis S. aureus 100 16 [92]
CdO Hydrothermal E. coli 20 22 [63]
S. aureus 20 20
MgO Microwave-assisted green route E. coli 100 18 [93]
S. aureus 100 20
NiO Microwave-assisted E. coli 10 18 [85]
NiO S. aureus 10 10
CdO Microwave-assisted hydrothermal E. coli 10 24 [64]
CdO S. aureus 10 22
MgO Microwave-assisted E. coli 10 20 [68]
MgO Simple hydrothermal E. coli 10 24
ZrO2 Microwave-assisted B. subtilis 50 24 [67]
TiO2 Green route E. coli 50 17 [12]
TiO2 S. aureus 50 17
V2O5 Ultrasound-assisted E. coli 100 21 [33]
S. aureus 100 19
CdO-NiO Microwave-assisted E. coli 10 20 [38]
S. aureus 10 20
CdO-ZnO Microwave-assisted E. coli 10 39 [85]
S. aureus 10 40
CdO-MgO Ultrasound-assisted E. coli 10 13 [66]
CdO-NiO-ZnO Microwave-assisted E. coli 100 16 [71]
S. aureus 100 27
CdO-ZnO-MgO Microwave-assisted E. coli 100 23 [72]
K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178 9
Table 7
Anticancer activity of metal oxide nanoparticles/composites against MCF-7 breast cancer
cell line.
Normal cells have a wide range of intrinsic defenses against cancer- Apoptosis is a highly regulated cell death process for the elim-
ous, and there are many changes need to occur before they start to grow ination of damaged cells in which the entire cell is dismantled
uncontrollably to form a tumor mass. Fig. 4 shows the hallmarks of within the cell unity thereby preventing the release of intracellular
cancer. components from the dying cell. Apoptosis is explained by cell
shrinkage, membrane blebbing, chromatin condensation and pre-
➢ Sustaining proliferative signaling: In normal cells, growth- cise DNA fragmentation which contribute to the neat disposal of
promoting signals are subject to a highly controlled process that the cell. Different from apoptosis is necrosis cell death where the
maintains a homeostasis of cell number, tissue architecture, and cell swells, cell membranes leak and cells spill out the contents
functioning by carefully instructing cell growth and division. On into their surroundings causing inflammation to the nearby tis-
the contrary, cancer cells are constantly generating proliferation sig- sue/cell. The reason behind the execution of apoptosis throughout
nals and manage chronic cell growth, characteristically comprising the life of humans or animals is to maintain tissue homeostasis
intracellular tyrosine kinase domains. i.e., the balance among cell proliferation and cell death. Neurode-
➢ Evading growth suppressors: Normal cells have tumor suppressive generative disorders correlate with the case of excessive apoptosis.
protein-coding genes (TP53, PTEN or RB) that are actively involved Conversely, suppression of apoptosis is essential during the devel-
in different modes to suppress cell growth and proliferation. Cells opment of tumors. Till now, there are two chief apoptotic mecha-
will undergo cell cycle to prevent or induce apoptosis with due nisms known namely: the extrinsic or death receptor mechanism,
respect of external or internal stimuli for activation of tumor- and the intrinsic or mitochondrial mechanism [96].
suppressive genes. Therefore, cancer cells must find a method to ar-
rest their expression or activation. Cancer cells can circumvent the 6.5. Clinical treatment of cancer
growth suppression by inactivating the proliferation in genes
through the whole loss of tumor suppressor gene or accumulation Clinical cancer treatments include chemotherapy, surgery, radiation
of mutations. therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, and cryotherapy. Surgery is
➢ Resisting cell death: Programmed cell death (apoptosis) is an ordi- mostly employed to physically eliminate the solid tumor mass from
nary barrier for cancer growth and progress. Though, cancer cells the body. Chemotherapy is the method of curing cancer with cytotoxic
can limit the apoptosis by a variety of strategies. The drugs as they are delivered directly to the tumor or circulate via the
defunctionalization of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene is one of blood streaming to any place in the body where cancer may be present.
the most common reasons for preventing proper apoptosis. Chemotherapy can eradicate the swiftly separating cancer cells usually
➢ Enabling replicative immortality: The differentiated normal cells can by troubling the DNA duplication. Radiotherapy is supported on the de-
only separate a limited number of times whereas cancer cells have compose of radionuclides by means of X-rays, γ-rays, electrons, protons,
nanocomposites and their applications in gas sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [52] Umaralikhan L, Jaffar M Jamal Mohamad. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 2016;1:1–9.
2017;9(37):31667–82. [53] Mardlroosi Anashen, Mahjoub Ali Reza, Fakhri Hanleh. J Mater Sci Mater Electron
[18] Labhane PK, Sonawane SH, Sonawane GH, Patil SP, Huse VR. J Phys Chem Solid 2017;28:11722–32.
2018;114:71–82. [54] Santhoshkumar A, Kavitha Helen P, Suresh R. J Adv Chem Sci 2016;2(2):230–2.
[19] Rajaboopathi S, Thambidurai S. Curr Appl Phys 2017;17:1622–38. [55] Lalithambika KC, Thanyumanavan A, Ravichandran K, Sriram S. J Mater Sci Mater
[20] Yufangi DM, Tendo JF, Ondoh AM, Mbadcam JK. J Mater Sci Res 2014;3:1–11. Electron 2016;27:1–7.
[21] Yousefi Ramin, Beheshtian Javad, Seyed-Talebi Seyedeh Mozhgan, Azimi HR, [56] Baibich MN, Broto JM, Fert A, Van Dau FN, Petroff F, Etienne P, et al. J Chazelas Phys
Jamali-Sheini Farid. Chem Asian J 2018;13(2):194–203. Rev Lett 1988;61:2472–8.
[22] Geetha D, Sathiya Priya A, Karthik K, Rajamoorthy M. Investigations on the en- [57] Arakha Manoranjan, Pal Sweta, Samantarrai Devyani, Panigrahi Tapan K, Mallick
hanced photocatalytic activity of (Ag, La) substituted nickel cobaltite spinels. Bairagi C, Pramanik Krishna, et al. Sci Rep 2015;5:14813–24.
Solid State Sci 2019;98:105992. [58] Artini C. RE-doped ceria systems and their performance as solid electrolytes: A puz-
[23] Kaviyarasu K, Manikandan E, Kennedy J, Maza M. RSC Adv 2015;5:82421–8. zling tangle of structural issues at the average and local scale. Inorg Chem 2018;57:
[24] Ayodhya Dasari, Veerabhadram Guttena. A review on recent advances in 13047–62.
photodegradation of dyes using doped and heterojunction based semiconductor [59] World Health Statistics. Publications of the world health organization: 20, Avenue
metal sulfide nanostructures for environmental protection. Mater Today Energy Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2011.
2018;9:83–113. [60] Zollinger H. VCH, Weinheim, Germany. 2nd ed.; 1991.
[25] van Driel BA, Kooyman PJ, van den Berg KJ, Schmidt-Ott A, Dik J. A quick assess- [61] Rajeshwar K, Osugi ME, Chanmanee W, Chenthamarakshan CR, Zanoni MVB
ment of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 pigments — from lab to conservation Kajitvichyanukul, Ayer P. J Photochem Photobiol C 2008;9:171–92.
studio. Microchem J 2016;126:162–71. [62] Houas A, Lachheb H, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann JM. Appl Catal Environ
[26] Basavaraju Neelima, Priolkar Kaustubh R, Gourier Didier, Sharma Suchinder K, 2001;31:145–57.
Bessie’reb Aure ’lie, Viana Bruno. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015;17:1790–2. [63] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. J Mater
[27] Camargo PHC, Satyanarayana KG, Wypych F. Mater Res 2009;12(1):1–39. Sci Mater Electron 2017;28:11420–9.
[28] Pina S, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Adv Mater 2015;27(7):1143–69. [64] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. Mater Res
[29] Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu Z-Z, Koratkar N. ACS Nano 2009;3(12): Innov 2019;23(5):310–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2018.1475443.
3884–90. [65] Karthik K, Revathi V, Tatarchuk Tetiana. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 2018;671(1):17–23.
[30] Mariano M, El Kissi N, Dufresne A. J Polym Sci B 2014;52(12):791–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2018.1542080.
[31] Intaphong Prakasit, Phuruangrat Anukorn, Karthik K, Thongtem Titipun, Thongtem [66] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. Mater
Somchai. Sonochemical synthesis and characterization of BiOCl nanoplates and Technol Adv Perform Mater 2019;34(7):403–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/
their photodegradation of Rhodamine B. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 2019;14(3): 10667857.2019.1574963.
593–9. [67] Karthik K, Madhukara Naik M, Shashank M, Vinuth Mirle, Revathi V. J Clust Sci
[32] Kannan Karthik, Radhika D, Nesaraj AS, Ahmed Mohammed Wasee, Namitha R. 2019;30:311–8.
Cost-effective method of Co-doped rare-earth-based ceria (Y-CGO) nanocomposite [68] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. J
as electrolyte for LT-SOFCs using C-TAB as surfactant. Mater Res Innov 2019. Photochem Photobiol Biol B 2019;190:8–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2019.1706032. [69] Karthik K, Shashank M, Revathi V, Tatarchuk Tetiana. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 2018;673
[33] Karthik K, Nikolova Maria P, Pushpa Anukorn Phuruangratc S, Revathi V, (1):70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2019.1578495.
Subbulakshmi M. Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of V2O5 nanoparticles for photo- [70] Phurangrat A, Karthik K, Kuntalue B, Dumrongrojthanath Phattranit, Thongtem
catalytic and antibacterial studies. Mater Res Innov 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/ Titipun, Thongtem Somchai. Chalcogenide Lett 2019;16(8):387–93.
14328917.2019.1634404. [71] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. J Mater
[35] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Sivaramakrishnan S. Antibacterial activities of Sci Mater Elect 2018;29:5459–71.
CdO microplates synthesized by hydrothermal method. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng [72] Revathi V, Karthik K. J Mater Sci Mater Elect 2018;29:18519–30.
2014;2(1):558–61 [ISSN: 2347-3207]. [73] Chwalibog A, Sawosz E, Mitura K, Grodzik M, Orlowski P, Sokolowska A. Int J
[36] Namitha R, Radhika Devi, Krishnamurthy G. Hydrothermally synthesized carbon Nanomedicine 2010;5:1085–94.
nanotubes for electrochemical hydrogen storage application. Issues Chem Chem [74] Eby DM, Shaeublin NM, Johnson GR. ACS Nano 2009;3:984–94.
Technol 2019;3:30–4.
[75] Whitesides GM. Small 2005;1:172–9.
[37] Intaphong Prakasit, Phuruangrat Anukorn, Karthik K, Dumrongrojthanath
[76] Xia Y. Nat Mater 2008;7:758–60.
Phattranit, Thongtem Titipun, Thongtem Somchai. Effect of pH on phase, morphol-
[77] Zhang LL, Jiang YH, Povey M, York D. J Nanopart Res 2007;9:479–89.
ogy and photocatalytic properties of BiOBr synthesized by hydrothermal method. J
[78] Baquero F, Coque MT, Cruz F. Antimicrob J Mater Agents Ch 2011;55:3649–60.
Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-019-01259-
[79] Yamamoto O. Int J Inorg Mater 2001;3:643–6.
0.
[80] Jin T, He Y. J Nanopart Res 2011;13:6877–85.
[38] Pradeeswari K, Venkatesan A, Pandi P, Guru Prasad K, Karthik K, Maiyalagan T, et al.
[81] Subhan MD Abdus, Ahamed Tanzir, Uddin Nizam, Azad Abdul Kalam, Begum
Effect of cerium on electrochemical properties of V2O5 nanoparticles synthesized
Kusuma. Spectrochim Acta Part A 2015;136:824–31.
via non-aqueous sol-gel technique. Ionics 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-
[82] Subhan Md Abdus, Uddin Nizam, Sarker Prosenjit, Nakata Hiroyasu, Makioka Ryuzi.
019-03259-z.
Spectrochim Acta Part A 2015;151:56–63.
[39] Pradeeswari K, Venkatesan A, Pandi P, Karthik K, Hari Krishna KV, Mohan Kumar R.
Study on the electrochemical performance of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized via [83] Arunadevi R, Kavitha B, Rajarajan M, Suganthi A, Jeyamurugan A. Surf Interf 2018;
non-aqueous sol-gel route for supercapacitor applications. Mater Res Express 10:32–44.
2019;6:105525. [84] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. J Phys
[40] Kannan Karthik, Sivasubramanian Dhanuskodi, Seetharaman Prabukumar, Chem Solids 2018;112:106–18.
Sivaperumal Sivaramakrishnan. Structural and biological properties with en- [85] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Sivaramakrishnan S. Spectrochimic Acta Part
hanced photocatalytic behaviour of CdO-MgO nanocomposite by microwave- A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2015;139:7–12.
assisted method. Optik 2020;204:164221. [86] Anitha S, Suganya M, Prabha D, Srivind J, Balamurugan S, Balu AR. Mater Chem
[41] Murugesan R, Sivakumar S, Karthik K, Anandan P, Harish M. Effect of Mg/Co doping Phys 2018;211:88–96.
and co-doping on the characterization of CdS thin films grown by spray pyrolysis [87] Maruthai Jayapriya, Muthukumarasamy Arulmozhi, Baskaran Balraj. Ceramic Int
method. Curr Appl Phys 2019;19 (1136–114). 2018;44 (13512–13160).
[42] Murugesan R, Sivakumar S, Karthik K, Anandan P, Harish M. Synthesis and charac- [88] Anindita Samanta, Goswami MN, Mahapatra PK. Phys E 2018;104:254–60.
terization of (Fe, Mn) co-doped spray pyrolysis CdS thin films for spintronics appli- [89] Alla SK, Verma AD, Kumar V, Mandal RK, Sinha I, Prasad NK. RSC Adv 2016;6:
cations. Appl Phys A 2019;125:281. 61927–33.
[43] Phurangrat A, Karthik K, Kuntalue B, Dumrongrojthanath Phattranit, Thongtem [90] Labhane PK, Sonawane SH, Sonawane GH, Patil SP, Huse VR. J Phys Chem Solids
Titipun, Thongtem Somchai. Refluxing synthesis and characterization of ZnS nano- 2018;114:71–82.
particles and their photocatalytic properties. Chalcogenide Lett 2019;16(8): [91] Rajaboopathi S, Thambidurai S. Curr Appl Phys 2017;17:1622–38.
387–93. [92] BehiyeŞenel NeslihanDemir, GülayBüyükköroğlu MustafaYıldız. Saudi Pharm J
[44] Cruje C, Chithrani DB. J Nanomed Res 2014;1(1):00006–10. 2019;27:846–58.
[45] Maria Magdalane C, Kaviyarasu K, Judith Vijaya J, Siddhardha Busi, Jeyaraj B. Photo- [93] Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Prabukumar S, Gobinath C, Sivaramakrishnan Mater S.
catalytic activity of binary metal oxide nanocomposites of CeO2/CdO nanospheres: Lett 2017;206:217–20.
investigation of optical and antimicrobial activity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol [94] Hanahn D, Weinberg RA. Cell 2000;100(1):57–70.
2016;163:77–86. [95] Hanahn D, Weinberg RA. Cell 2011;144(5):646–74.
[46] Malekigorji M, Hoskins C, Curtis T, Varbiro G. J Nanomed Res 2014;1(2):00010–8. [96] Vries RG, Huch M, Clevers H. Mol Oncol 2010;4(5):373–84.
[47] Bououdina Mohamed, Dakhel Aqeel Aziz, El-Hilo Mohammad, Anjum Dalaver H, [97] Elmore S. Toxicol Pathol 2007;35(4):495–516.
Benali Mohammed. RSC Adv 2015;5:33233–8. [98] Zimmermann KC, Green DR. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108(4):S99–103.
[48] Blum JL, Edwards JR, Prozialeck WC, Xiong JQ, Zelikoff JT. J Toxicol Environ Health A [99] Summer B, Gao J. Nanomed 2008;3(2):17–140.
2015;78(12):711–24. [100] Nie Z, Fava D, Rubin Stein M, Kumachera E. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130(11):3683–9.
[49] Sachet E, Shelton CT, Harris JS, Gaddy BE, Irving DL. Nat Mater 2015;14(4):414–20. [101] Perumal Raj K, Sivakarthik P, Uthirakumar AP, Thangaraj V. J Chem Pharm Sci 2014;
[50] Gupta Jagriti, Bahadur D. ACS Omega 2018;3(3):2956–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/ 4:269–71.
acsomega.7b01953. [102] Murugan Kadarkarai, Dinesh Devakumar, Kavithaa Krishnamoorthy, Paulpandi
[51] Kumar MR Anil, Nagaswarupa HP, Raju KS Ananthu, Gurushantha K, Kumar C Manickam, Ponraj Thondhi, Alsalhi Mohamad Saleh, et al. Parasitol Res 2016;
Pratap, Prashantha SC, et al. Mater Res Express 2015;2:095004–21. 115:1085–96.
12 K. Kannan et al. / Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 281 (2020) 102178
[103] Selvakumari D, Deepa R, Mahalakshmi V, Subashini P, Lakshminarayan N. ARPN J [107] Sankar Renu, Maheswaran Ramasamy, Karthik Selvaraju, Shivashangari Kanchi
Eng Appl Sci 2015;10(12):5418–21. Subramanian, Ravikumar Vilwanathan. Mater Sci Eng C 2014;44:234–9.
[104] Hathout Amal S, Aljawish Abdulhadi, Sabry Baseem A, El-Nekeety Aziza A, Roby [108] Pham Xuan Nui, Nguyen Tan Phuoc, Pham Tuyet Nhung, Tran Thi Thuy Nga, Tran
Mohamed H, Deraz Nasseralla M, et al. J Appl Pharm Sci 2017;7(01):086–92. Thi Van Thi. Adv Mat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 2016;7:045010–9.
[105] Rehana D, Mahendran D, Senthilkumar R, Kaliur Rahiman A. Biomed Pharmacother [109] Ranjan Shivendu, Dasgupta Nandita, Rajendran Bhavapriya, Avadhani Ganesh S,
2017;89:1067–77. Ramalingam Chidamabaram, Kumar Ashutosh. Enviorn Sci Pollut Res 2016;23:
[106] Hassan HFH, Mansour AM, Abo-Youssef AMH, Elsadek BEM, Messiha BAS. Clin Exp 12287–302.
Pharmacol Physiol 2017;44:235–43.