Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Chapter # 4
Section : A/B
1. Identifying the current state of knowledge: A critical literature review provides a comprehensive
overview of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic or research question, including
the key concepts, theories, and findings that have been developed.
2. Evaluating the quality of existing research: A critical literature review evaluates the quality of
existing research studies, identifying strengths and weaknesses in methodology, analysis, and
interpretation of findings.
3. Identifying gaps in knowledge: A critical literature review identifies gaps in current knowledge
and highlights areas where further research is needed.
4. Synthesizing knowledge: A critical literature review synthesizes and integrates findings from
multiple studies to develop a more complete understanding of a particular topic or research
question.
5. Providing a foundation for further research: A critical literature review provides a foundation for
further research by identifying areas where additional studies are needed, and by highlighting
promising approaches and methods for future investigations.
Overall, the purpose of a critical literature review is to provide a comprehensive and balanced assessment
of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic, with the goal of advancing our understanding and
informing future research.
Q#2: “The exact purpose of a critical literature review depends on the research approach
that is taken.” Discuss this statement.
The purpose of a critical literature review can vary depending on the research approach that is taken.
Different research approaches may prioritize different aspects of the literature review, leading to different
purposes. Here are a few examples:
1. Quantitative research: In quantitative research, the primary purpose of a critical literature review
is often to identify gaps in the existing research that can be addressed through empirical
investigation. A thorough review of the literature helps to identify the key variables and
theoretical frameworks that have been used in previous studies, as well as potential
methodological limitations or issues that need to be addressed. The purpose is to develop a
research question that is well-informed and that contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
2. Qualitative research: In qualitative research, the purpose of a critical literature review may be to
develop a theoretical framework or conceptual model that can be used to guide data collection
and analysis. A thorough review of the literature helps to identify key concepts and themes that
have emerged in previous studies, as well as different theoretical perspectives and paradigms that
may be relevant to the research question. The purpose is to develop a coherent and well-grounded
theoretical framework that can be used to interpret the data.
Q#3: Provide at least two distinctive definitions of two of the following terms:
1. Leadership:
"Leadership is the process of social influence in which a person is able to enlist the aid and
support of others in the accomplishment of a common task."
2. Organizational effectiveness:
"Organizational effectiveness is the degree to which an organization is able to meet its objectives
and goals, and to remain competitive in its environment."
"Organizational effectiveness is the extent to which an organization can achieve its goals and
objectives, given its resources and constraints."
Q#4: How would you go about doing a literature review in the area of corporate social
responsibility?
Here are the general steps to follow when conducting a literature review in the area of corporate social
responsibility (CSR):
1. Define your research question: Start by defining your research question or objective. This will
help you to focus your search and determine which studies are relevant to your research.
2. Develop a search strategy: Develop a search strategy to identify relevant studies. This may
involve using databases, search engines, and other sources to locate studies that relate to your
research question. Keywords that can be used in your search include "corporate social
responsibility," "business ethics," "sustainability," "social impact," and "corporate citizenship,"
among others.
3. Evaluate the quality of the studies: Evaluate the quality of the studies that you have identified.
This can involve assessing the methodology used, the quality of the data, the credibility of the
author, and the relevance of the study to your research question.
4. Synthesize the literature: Synthesize the literature that you have reviewed. This can involve
identifying common themes or patterns in the research, summarizing the findings of the studies,
and highlighting areas of agreement or disagreement in the literature.
5. Identify gaps in the literature: Identify gaps in the literature and areas where further research is
needed. This can involve identifying areas where the research is contradictory, where there are
conflicting findings, or where there are gaps in the research.
6. Write the literature review: Write the literature review, organizing your findings into a coherent
and well-structured narrative. This should include an introduction that outlines the purpose of the
literature review, a summary of the literature, a discussion of the gaps in the literature, and a
conclusion that summarizes the key findings and implications for future research.
7. Revise and edit: Revise and edit the literature review, ensuring that it is clear, concise, and well-
organized. Check for spelling and grammatical errors, and ensure that your references are
properly cited.
Overall, conducting a literature review in the area of CSR requires a systematic and thorough approach to
reviewing the available research, synthesizing the findings, and identifying gaps in the literature. By
following these steps, you can produce a high-quality literature review that contributes to our
understanding of CSR and its impact on businesses and society.
Q#5: Why is appropriate citation important? What are the consequences of not giving
credit to the source from which materials are extracted?
1. Giving credit: Appropriate citation gives credit to the original author or source of the material.
This is important because it recognizes the intellectual property of others and acknowledges their
contribution to the development of knowledge and ideas.
2. Avoiding plagiarism: Plagiarism is the act of presenting someone else's work or ideas as your
own without appropriate citation. It is a serious offense in academic and professional contexts and
can result in a loss of credibility, reputation, and even legal consequences.
3. Demonstrating credibility: Appropriate citation demonstrates credibility and expertise by showing
that you have done your research and are familiar with the relevant literature on a topic.
4. Supporting claims: Appropriate citation provides evidence to support claims or arguments made
in a piece of writing. It shows that the writer has considered and integrated relevant information
and ideas from other sources.
The consequences of not giving credit to the source from which materials are extracted can be severe.
Plagiarism can result in a range of penalties, depending on the context and severity of the offense. In
academic settings, plagiarism can result in a failing grade, suspension, or expulsion. In professional
settings, it can lead to termination of employment or legal action. Additionally, plagiarism can damage
one's reputation and credibility, both personally and professionally. Therefore, it is important to always
give appropriate credit to the sources from which materials are extracted to avoid the negative
consequences of plagiarism.