Ch450 and Ch451: Biochemistry - Defining Life at The Molecular Level
Ch450 and Ch451: Biochemistry - Defining Life at The Molecular Level
edu/)
Chemistry (https://wou.edu/chemistry/)
12.10 References
Mutations also differ in the way that the genetic material is changed. Mutations may change an entire chromosome or just one or a few
nucleotides.
Chromosomal alterations are mutations that change chromosome structure or number. They occur when a section of a chromosome breaks
off and rejoins incorrectly or does not rejoin at all. Possible ways these mutations can occur are illustrated in the figure below. Chromosomal
alterations are very serious. They often result in the death of the cell or organism in which they occur. If the organism survives, it may be
affected in multiple ways. An example of a human chromosomal alteration is the mutation that causes Down Syndrome. It is a duplication
mutation that leads to developmental delays and other abnormalities. It occurs when the individual inherits an extra copy of chromosome 21.
It is also called trisomy (“three-chromosome”) 21. Thus, large-scale mutations in chromosomal structure include: (1) Amplifications (including
gene duplications) where repetition of a chromosomal segment or presence of extra piece of a chromosome broken piece of a chromosome
may become attached to a homologous or non-homologous chromosome so that some of the genes are present in more than two doses
leading to multiple copies of all chromosomal regions, increasing the dosage of the genes located within them, (2) Deletions of large
chromosomal regions, leading to loss of the genes within those regions, and (3) Chromosomal Rearrangements such as translocations
(which interchange of genetic parts from nonhomologous chromosomes), insertions (which insert segments of one chromosome into another
nonhomologous chromosome), and inversions (which invert or flip a section of a chromosome into the opposite orientation)(Figure 12.1).
(https://wou.edu/chemistry/files/2020/07/chromosomal-damage.png)
Figure 12.1 Chromosomal Alterations. Chromosomal alterations are major changes in the genetic material.Image modified from Dietzel65
(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chromosomenmutationen.png)
There are also smaller mutations that can occur that only alter a single nucleotide or a small number of nucleotides within a localized region
of the DNA. These are classified according to how the DNA molecule is altered. One type, a point mutation, affects a single base and most
commonly occurs when one base is substituted or replaced by another. Mutations also result from the addition of one or more bases, known
as an insertion, or the removal of one or more bases, known as a deletion.
Point mutations may have a wide range of effects on protein function (Table 12.1 and Figure 12.2). As a consequence of the degeneracy of the
genetic code, a point mutation will commonly result in the same amino acid being incorporated into the resulting polypeptide despite the
sequence change. This change would have no effect on the protein’s structure, and is thus called a silent mutation. A missense
mutation results in a different amino acid being incorporated into the resulting polypeptide. The effect of a missense mutation depends on
how chemically different the new amino acid is from the wild-type amino acid. The location of the changed amino acid within the protein also
is important. For example, if the changed amino acid is part of the enzyme’s active site or greatly affects the shape of the enzyme, then the
effect of the missense mutation may be significant. Many missense mutations result in proteins that are still functional, at least to some
degree. Sometimes the effects of missense mutations may be only apparent under certain environmental conditions; such missense
mutations are called conditional mutations. Rarely, a missense mutation may be beneficial. Under the right environmental conditions, this
type of mutation may give the organism that harbors it a selective advantage. Yet another type of point mutation, called a nonsense
mutation, converts a codon encoding an amino acid (a sense codon) into a stop codon (a nonsense codon). Nonsense mutations result in the
synthesis of proteins that are shorter than the wild type and typically not functional (Summarized in Figure 12.3).
Table 12.1: Types of Point Mutations
Smaller scale deletions and insertions also cause various effects. Because codons are triplets of nucleotides, insertions or deletions in
groups of three nucleotides may lead to the insertion or deletion of one or more amino acids and may not cause significant effects on the
resulting protein’s functionality. However, frameshift mutations, caused by insertions or deletions of a number of nucleotides that are not a
multiple of three are extremely problematic because a shift in the reading frame results (Figure 12.3). Because ribosomes read the mRNA in
triplet codons, frameshift mutations can change every amino acid after the point of the mutation. The new reading frame may also include a
stop codon before the end of the coding sequence. Consequently, proteins made from genes containing frameshift mutations are nearly
always nonfunctional.
(https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-
images/wp-content/uploads/sites/1094/2016/11/03164649/OSC_Microbio_11_05_EffMut.jpg)
Figure 12.3. Summary of Small Scale Mutations on Protein Coding Regions. DNA alterations that lead to changes in the protein sequence
encoded by the DNA can include point mutations, DNA insertions, and DNA deletions.
Figure from: Parker, et al (2019) Microbiology from Openstax (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/chapter/mutations/)
The majority of mutations have neither negative nor positive effects on the organism in which they occur. These mutations are called neutral
mutations. Examples include silent point mutations, which are neutral because they do not change the amino acids in the proteins they
encode.
Some mutations have a positive effect on the organism in which they occur. They are referred to as beneficial mutations. If they occur in
germline cells (eggs or sperm) these traits can be heritable and passed from one generation to the next. Beneficial mutations generally code
for new versions of proteins that help organisms adapt to their environment. If they increase an organism’s chances of surviving or
reproducing, the mutations are likely to become more common within a population over time. There are several well-known examples of
beneficial mutations. Here are just two:
1. Mutations have occurred in bacteria that allow the bacteria to survive in the presence of antibiotic drugs. The mutations have led to the
evolution of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria.
2. A unique mutation is found in people in a small town in Italy. The mutation protects them from developing atherosclerosis, which is the
dangerous buildup of fatty materials in blood vessels. The individual in which the mutation first appeared has even been identified.
Harmful mutations can also occur. Imagine making a random change in a complicated machine such as a car engine. The chance that the
random change would improve the functioning of the car is very small. The change is far more likely to result in a car that does not run well
or perhaps does not run at all. By the same token, any random change in a gene’s DNA is more likely to result in the production of a protein
that does not function normally or may not function at all, than in a mutation that improves the function. Such mutations are likely to be
harmful. Harmful mutations may cause genetic disorders or cancer.
A genetic disorder is a disease, syndrome, or other abnormal condition caused by a mutation in one or more genes or by a chromosomal
alteration. An example of a genetic disorder is cystic fibrosis. A mutation in a single gene causes the body to produce thick, sticky mucus
that clogs the lungs and blocks ducts in digestive organs. Genetic disorders are usually caused by gene mutations that occur within
germline cells and are heritable in nature.
Illnesses caused by mutations that occur within an individual, but are not passed on to their offspring, are mutations that occur in somatic
cells. Cancer is a disease caused by an accumulation of mutations within somatic cells. It results in cells that grow out of control and form
abnormal masses of cells called tumors. It is generally caused by mutations in genes that regulate the cell cycle, DNA repair, angiogenesis,
and other genes that favor cell growth and survival. Because of the mutations, cells with the mutated DNA have evolved to divide without
restrictions, hide from the immune system, and develop drug resistance.
Figure 12.4 Reactive Oxygen Species and DNA Damage. Under conditions of oxidative stress, 8-oxoG is the result of reactive oxygen
species (ROS) modifying a guanine.
Figure from: Poetsch, A.R. (2020) Comp & Struct Biotech J. 18:207-219 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037019304209).
As mentioned previously, increased levels of 8-oxo-dG in a tissue can serve as a biomarker of oxidative stress. Furthermore, increased levels
of 8-oxo-dG are frequently found associated with carcinogenesis and other disease states (Figure 12.5). During the replication of DNA that
contains 8-oxo-dG, adenine is most often incorporated across from the lesion. Following replication, the 8-oxo-dG is excised during the repair
process and a thymine is incorporated in its place. Thus, 8-oxo-dG mutations typically result in a G to T transversion.
Figure 12.5 Oxidative Stress and Human Health. DNA damage caused by oxidative stress has been associated with many human disease
states.
Figure from: Galano, A., Tan, D-X., and Reiter, R.J. (2018) Molecules 23(3)530 (https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/23/3/530/htm)
Alkylation of Bases
Alkylating agents are widespread in the environment and are also produced endogenously, as by-products of cellular metabolism. They
introduce lesions into DNA or RNA bases that can be cytotoxic, mutagenic, or neutral to the cell. Figure 12.6 depicts the major reactive sites
on the DNA bases that are susceptible to alkylation. Cytotoxic lesions block replication, interrupt transcription, or signal the activation of
apoptosis, whereas mutagenic ones are miscoding and cause mutations in newly synthesized DNA.The most common type of alkylation is
methylaton with the major products including N7-methylguanine (7meG), N3-methyladenine (3meA), and O6-methylguanine (O6meG). Smaller
amounts methylation also occurs on other DNA bases, and include the formation of N1-methyladenine (1meA), N3-methylcytosine (3meC), O4-
methylthymine (O4meT), and methyl phosphotriesters (MPT).
(https://wou.edu/chemistry/files/2020/07/Alkylation-sites-on-DNA-bases.jpg)
Figure 12.6 Major Sites of Alkylation in DNA. The diagram shows DNA Watson-Crick base pairs with principal damage sites modified by
small alkylating agents (methyl and ethyl). (A) Sites of base modification by SN1 and SN2 alkylating agents. The orange indicates major damage
sites andthe green minor damage sites. (B) Phosphotriester formation indicated by the presence of methyl groups, along withthe Rp and Sp
isomers.
Figure from: Ahmad, A., Nay, S.L. and O’Conner, T.R. (2015) Chapter 4 Direct Reversal Repair in Mammalian Cells
(https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/48191.pdf)
Alkylating agents can cause damage at all exocyclic nitrogens and oxygens in DNA and RNA, as well as at ring nitrogens (Figure 12.6A).
However, the percentage of each base site modified depends on the alkylating agent, the position in DNA or RNA, and whether nucleic acids
are single- or double-stranded. Interestingly, O-alkylations are more mutagenic and harmful than N-alkylations, which may be more cytotoxic,
but not as mutagenic.
As we will explore in Chapter 13, methylation of DNA also serves as an important mechanism regulating gene expression.
Base Loss
An AP site (apurinic/apyrimidinic site), also known as an abasic site, is a location in DNA (also in RNA but much less likely) that has neither
a purine nor a pyrimidine base, either spontaneously or due to DNA damage (Figure 12.7). It has been estimated that under physiological
conditions 10,000 apurinic sites and 500 apyrimidinic may be generated in a cell daily.
Figure 12.7 Abasic Sites. Apurinic and Apyrimidimic (AP) sites occur due to unstable hydrolysis.
Figure from Mayhew (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP_site#/media/File:Site_AP.gif)
AP sites can be formed by spontaneous depurination, but also occur as intermediates in base excision repair, the repair process described in
section 12.5. If left unrepaired, AP sites can lead to mutation during semiconservative replication. They can cause replication fork stalling and
are often bypassed by translesion synthesis, that is discussed in greater detail in section 12.8. In E. coli, adenine is preferentially inserted
across from AP sites, known as the “A rule”. The situation is more complex in higher eukaryotes, with different nucleotides showing a
preference depending on the organism and environmental conditions.
Bulky Adduct Formation
Some chemicals are biologically reactive and will form covalent linkages with biological molecules such as DNA and proteins creating large
bulky adducts, or appendages, that branch off from the main molecule. We will use the mutagen/carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene, as an
example for this process.
Benzo[a]pyrene is a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon that forms during the incomplete combustion of organic matter at temperatures
between 300°C (572°F) and 600°C (1,112°F). The ubiquitous compound can be found in coal tar, tobacco smoke and many foods, especially
grilled meats. Benzo[a]pyrene is actually a procarcinogen that needs to be biologically activated by metabolism before it forms a reactive
metabolite (Figure 12.8) Normally, when the body is exposed to foreign molecules, it will start a metabolic process that makes the molecule
more hydrophilic and easier to remove as a waste product. Unfortunately, in the case of benzo[a]pyrene, the resulting metabolite is a highly
reactive epoxide that forms a bulky adduct preferentially with guanine residues in DNA. If left unrepaired, during DNA replication an adenine
will usually be placed across from the lesion in the daughter molecule. Subsequent repair of the adduct will result in the replacement of the
damaged guanine base with a thymine, causing a G –> T transversion mutation.
(https://wou.edu/chemistry/files/2020/07/benzoapyrene-adducts.png)
Figure 12.8 Benzo[a]pyrene Activation and Adduct Formation. (A) Benzo[a]pyrene is biologically activated to a dihydrodial epoxide during
normal metabolic processes. (B) Cigarette smoke is a source of benzo[a]pyrene. (C) The activated (+)benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-
epoxide can form a DNA adduct with guanine residues. (D) The benzo[a]pyrene adduct forms a bulky lesion that distorts the DNA backbone.
Figures from: (A) Eleska, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzo(a)pyrene#/media/File:Benzo(a)pyrene_metabolism.svg) (B) Elizabeth Aguilera
(https://www.scpr.org/news/2015/09/08/54213/new-study-finds-link-between-vaping-and-tobacco-ci/) (C) DI93biochemist,
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzo(a)pyrene#/media/File:DG_rxn_with_BPDE.jpg)and (D) Zephryis
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzo(a)pyrene#/media/File:Benzopyrene_DNA_adduct_1JDG.png)
Back to the Top
DNA Crosslinking
Crosslinking of DNA occurs when various exogenous or endogenous agents react with two nucleotides of DNA, forming a covalent linkage
between them. This crosslink can occur within the same strand (intrastrand) or between opposite strands of double-stranded DNA
(interstrand) (Figure 12.9). These adducts interfere with cellular metabolism, such as DNA replication and transcription, triggering cell death.
(https://wou.edu/chemistry/files/2020/07/thymine-dimers.png)
Figure 12.10 Double-Stranded DNA breaks and Thymine Dimer Formation (a) Ionizing radiation, such as X-rays and γ-rays contain enough
energy to cause single and double-stranded breaks in the DNA backbone. (b) Energy from non-ionizing radiation such as UV-light is directly
absorbed by the DNA causing thymine residues that are adjacent within a single DNA strand to become crosslinked. (c) a 6,4-dimer that forms
a single covalent bond and (d) thymine-thymine cyclobutane dimer that forms a two covalent bonds between the thymine residues.
Figures from: (a and b) Parker, et al (2019) Microbiology from Openstax (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/chapter/mutations/)
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrimidine_dimer#/media/File:DNA_UV_mutation.svg)and (c and d) Smokefoot
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrimidine_dimer#/media/File:Photodimer.png)
Figure 12.12 Cell Fates Following DNA Damage. Cell cycle checkpoints are induced by DNA damage, shown in red. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase
Inhibitors (CIP/KIP), shown in purple, block cell cycle progession in all phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2, or M) following DNA damage by
inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase complexes (shown in green). Signaling cascades activated in response to DNA damage also elicit DNA repair
pathways, or if the DNA damage is severe, programmed cell death (Apoptosis) will be activated.
Image from: Ding, L., et al. (2020) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(6):1960 (https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/6/1960/htm)
Back to the Top
In addition to blocking cell cycle progression, DNA damage sensors also activate DNA repair mechanisms that are specific for the type of
damage present. For example, single stranded DNA breaks are repaired primarily by Base Excision Repair, bulky DNA adducts and crosslinks
are repaired by Nucleotide Excision Repair, and smaller nucleotide mutations, such as alkylation are repaired by Mismatch Repair. Cells also
have two major mechanisms for repairing Double-Strand-Breaks (DSBs). They include Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous
Recombination (HR). If damage is too extensive to be repaired, apoptotic pathways will be elicited. In the following sections, details about the
major DNA repair pathways will be given.
Figure 12.14 Base Excision Repair. Base excision repair (BER) of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG). Oxidative DNA damage is repaired via
several repair intermediates by base excision repair (BER). Through removal of the oxidized base, a reactive apurinic site (AP site) is formed.
Incision of the strand creates a single strand break, and the damaged site is then repaired through either short or long patch BER
Figure from: Poetsch, A.R. (2020) Comp & Struct Biotech J. 18:207-219 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037019304209).
Genetic mutations in NER pathway genes can result in UV-sensitive and high-carcinogenic pathologies, such as xeroderma pigmentosum (XP),
the Cockayne syndrome (CS), and trichothiodystrophy (TTD), as well as some neurodegenerative manifestations.
Xeroderma pigmentosum has provided the names of some of the genes involved in NER. Mutation of XP genes and loss of proper NER
function cause the symptoms associated with the disease. People with XP have an impaired ability to repair bulky DNA adducts and crosslinks,
such as thymine dimers that are caused by UV-light exposure. People suffering from XP have extreme photosensitivity, skin atrophy,
hyperpigmentation and a high rate of sunlight-induced skin cancer (Figure 12.16). The risk of internal tumors in XP patients is also 1,000-fold
higher. Moreover, the disease is often associated with neurologic disorders. Currently, there is no effective treatment for this disorder.
Figure 12.16 An eight year old girl from Guatemala with Xeroderma Pigmentosum. Frontal image of face, showing large hyperkeratotic
lesions with some induration suspicious of actinic keratosis and early squamous cell carcinoma. Also numerous hyper-pigmented lentigos and
xerosis on the entire front of the face. Marked corneal scarring and injection is evident.
Figure from: James Halpern, Bryan Hopping and Joshua M Brostoff
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeroderma_pigmentosum#/media/File:Xeroderma_pigmentosum_02.jpg)
The detection of bulky DNA lesions during NER is particularly challenging for a cell, which can be solved only through highly sensitive
recognition that require multiple protein components. In contrast to BER, where a damaged base is simultaneously recognized and eliminated
by a single specialized glycosylase, specialized groups of proteins are responsible for recognition of the lesion and the excision of the lesion in
NER. In eukaryotic NER, universal sensor proteins perform the initial recognition of the total range of bulky damages. In the case of TC-NER, it
occurs when the transcribing RNA polymerase II is stalled by damage; in GG-NER, these are complexes of the XPC factor and DDB1-DDB2
heterodimer (XPE factor) enhancing the repair of UV damage (Fig 12.15). In general, NER recognition of damage is a multistep process
involving several proteins that form near damaged complexes of variable compositions. The process is completed by the formation of a
preincision complex ready to eliminate a damaged DNA fragment by specialized NER endonucleases.
In a eukaryotic cell after stable XPC/DNA complex formation during the initial recognition of the damage, NER is actually performed by a
repairasome, which is a complex of variable composition and architecture consisting of a large number of subunits. Individual subunits of the
complex have no sufficient affinity and selectivity to the substrate (DNA containing bulky damage). The situation changes when specific
protein complexes are established at the damage site. The NER proteins of these complexes are joined by the DNA processing. A total of 18
polypeptides must be accurately positioned within two or three DNA turns when a stable structure ready for damage removal is formed and
excision starts. The structure of NER-associated proteins provides the possibility of contact with the DNA substrate and of dynamic specific
protein-protein interactions. The changes in interactions performed by the same protein are one of the mechanisms that regulate the repair
process and fine-tune the complexes, providing high-precision nucleotide excision repair.
Back to the Top
Figure 2.16 Main Pathways of DNA Double-Stranded Break Repair. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination
(HR) pathways act competitively to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Key players of NHEJ and HR are depicted. The MRE11/RAD50/XRS2
(MRX) complex is recruited very early at DNA ends and appears to play important roles for both NHEJ and HR. Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer is
required for NHEJ and, through inhibition of DNA end resection (5′–3′ exo), acts as a repressor of HR. Fidelity of NHEJ-dependent DSB repair is
low and, most of the time, associated with nucleotide deletions and/or insertions at repair junctions. The common early step of HR-dependent
mechanisms is the formation of ssDNA which is then coated by replication protein A (RPA). Single-strand annealing (SSA) mechanism requires
the presence of direct repeats (shown in orange) on both sides of the break. SSA does not imply any strand invasion process and is therefore
not dependent on RAD51 protein. Strand invasion and D-loop formation are however common steps of synthesis-dependent strand annealing
(SDSA) and double Holliday junction (HJ) dissolution mechanisms. In the latter case, double Holliday junctions are resolved with or without
crossing-over.
Figure from: Diccotignies, A. (2013) Frontiers in Genetics 4(48):48 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236129718_Alternative_end-
joining_mechanisms_A_historical_perspective)
In contrast to NHEJ, homologous recombination (HR) requires a homologous DNA sequence to serve as a template for DNA-synthesis-
dependent repair and involves extensive DNA-end processing. As expected, HR is extremely accurate, as it leads to precise repair of the
damaged locus using DNA sequences homologous to the broken ends. HR predominantly uses the sister chromatid as a template for DSB
repair, rather than the homologous chromosome. Correspondingly, HR is largely inhibited while cells are in the G1 phase of the cell cycle,
when the sister chromatid has not yet been replicated (Fig 2.17A). HR repair mechanisms play a bigger role in DSB repair that occurs after S-
phase DNA replication (S-phase, G2, and M).
Repair through HR is not defined by a unique mechanism but operates through various mechanistically distinct DSB repair processes,
including synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA), double Holliday junction resolution, and single-strand annealing (SSA). The common
step for HR-dependent DSB repair mechanisms is the initial formation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) for pairing with homologous DNA
template sequences. For this to occur, the 5′ DNA strand at the DSB is processed by multiple nucleases and accessory proteins to create a 3′
ssDNA section that can be used as a template for recombination (Fig. 2.16).
Figure 2.17B provides a more detailed look at the HR process. During the highly regulated process of HR, three main phases can be
distinguished. Firstly, 3′-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) ends are generated by nucleolytic degradation of the 5′-strands. This first step is
catalyzed by endonucleases, including the MRN complex (consisting of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1). In a second step, the ssDNA-ends are coated
by replication protein A (RPA) filaments. In a third step, RPA is replaced by Rad51 in a BRCA1- and BRCA2-dependent process, to ultimately
perform the recombinase reaction using a homologous DNA template.
Importantly, HR is not only employed to repair DNA lesions induced by DNA damaging agents, but is also essential for proper chromosome
segregation during meiosis. The relevance of HR in these physiological processes is illustrated by its strict requirement during development.
Mice lacking key HR genes, such as Brca1, Brca2, or Rad51, display extensive genetic alterations which lead to early embryonic lethality.
Whereas homozygous inactivation of HR genes is usually embryonic lethal, heterozygous inactivation of for instance, BRCA1 and BRCA2, does
not interfere with cellular viability but rather predisposes individuals to cancer, including breast and ovarian cancer. The tumors that develop
in individuals with heterozygous BRCA1/2 mutations invariably lose their second BRCA1/2 allele, indicating that in certain cancers, the absence
of BRCA1/2 is compatible with cellular proliferation. How exactly such tumors cope with their HR defect is currently not fully understood.
Figure 2.17 DNA double strand break (DSBs) repair. (A) DNA DSBs repair pathways in the context of cell cycle regulation. Non-homologous
end joining (NHEJ) can be performed throughout the cell cycle and is indicated with the red line. Homologous recombination (HR) can only be
employed in S/G2 phases of the cell cycle and is indicated in green. (B) The key steps in HR repair pathway are indicated. After DSB
recognition, 5′–3′ end resection is initiated by the MRN (Mre11, Rad50, Nbs1) complex and CtIP. Subsequently, further resection by the Exo1,
DNA2, and Sgs1 proteins is conducted to ensure ‘maintained’ resection. Then, resected DNA-ends are bound by replication protein A (RPA).
The actual recombination step within HR repair, termed strand exchange, is executed by the recombinase Rad51. Rad51 replaces RPA to
eventually assemble helical nucleoprotein filaments called ‘presynaptic filaments.’ This process is facilitated by other HR components, including
BRCA1 and BRCA2. Final step of junction resolution is executed by helicases including Bloom syndrome, RecQ helicase-like (BLM) helicase.
Figure from: Krajewska, M., Fehrmann, R.S.N., de Vries, E.G.E., and van Vugt, A.A.T.M. (2015) Front. Genet. 6:96
(https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2015.00096/full)
Back to the Top
The activity of error prone DNA polymerases is tightly regulated to avoid the rampant introduction of mutations within the DNA sequence.
One of the main mechanisms that is employed within a replisome that is stalled at the replication fork due to DNA damage, involves the
monoubiquitination of PCNA. Recall from Chapter 9, that PCNA is the sliding clamp that enables the DNA polymerase to bind tightly enough
with the DNA during replication to mediate efficient DNA synthesis. Monoubiquitination of PCNA enables the recruitment of a translesion DNA
polymerases and the bypass of the damaged lesions during DNA synthesis.
During translesion synthesis, the polymerase must insert a dNTP opposite of the lesion. It is likely that none of the dNTP bases will be able to
form stable hydrogen bond interactions with the damaged lesion. Thus, the nucleotide that causes the least distortion or repulsion will
usually be added across from the lesion. This can cause transition or transversion mutations to occur at the lesion location. Alternatively,
translesion polymerases can be prone to slippage, and either cause an insertion or deletion mutation in the vicinity of the DNA lesion. These
slippages can lead to frameshift mutations if they occur within gene coding regions. Thus, over a lifetime, translesion synthesis in multicellular
organisms can lead to an accumulation of mutations within somatic cells and cause the formation of tumors and the disease of cancer.
Evolution by natural selection is also possible due to random mutations that occur within germ cells. Occasionally, germline mutations may
lead to a beneficial mutation that enhances the survival of an individual within a population. If this gene proves to enhance the survival of the
population, it will be selected for over time within the population and cause the evolution of that species. An example of a beneficial mutation
is the case a population of people that show resistance to HIV infection. Since the first case of infection with human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) was reported in 1981, nearly 40 million people have died from HIV infection, the virus that causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome
(AIDS). The virus targets helper T cells that play a key role in bridging the innate and adaptive immune response, infecting and killing cells
normally involved in the body’s response to infection. There is no cure for HIV infection, but many drugs have been developed to slow or
block the progression of the virus. Although individuals around the world may be infected, the highest prevalence among people 15–49 years
old is in sub-Saharan Africa, where nearly one person in 20 is infected, accounting for greater than 70% of the infections worldwide (Figure
2.18). Unfortunately, this is also a part of the world where prevention strategies and drugs to treat the infection are the most lacking.
Figure 2.18 HIV is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, but its prevalence is quite low in some other parts of the world.
Figure from: Parker, et al (2019) Microbiology from Openstax (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/chapter/mutations/)
In recent years, scientific interest has been piqued by the discovery of a few individuals from northern Europe who are resistant to HIV
infection. In 1998, American geneticist Stephen J. O’Brien at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and colleagues published the results of
their genetic analysis of more than 4,000 individuals. These indicated that many individuals of Eurasian descent (up to 14% in some ethnic
groups) have a deletion mutation, called CCR5-delta 32, in the gene encoding CCR5. CCR5 is a coreceptor found on the surface of T-cells that
is necessary for many strains of the virus to enter the host cell. The mutation leads to the production of a receptor to which HIV cannot
effectively bind and thus blocks viral entry. People homozygous for this mutation have greatly reduced susceptibility to HIV infection, and
those who are heterozygous have some protection from infection as well.
It is not clear why people of northern European descent, specifically, carry this mutation, but its prevalence seems to be highest in northern
Europe and steadily decreases in populations as one moves south. Research indicates that the mutation has been present since before HIV
appeared and may have been selected for in European populations as a result of exposure to the plague or smallpox. This mutation may
protect individuals from plague (caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis) and smallpox (caused by the variola virus) because this receptor may
also be involved in these diseases. The age of this mutation is a matter of debate, but estimates suggest it appeared between 1875 years to
225 years ago, and may have been spread from Northern Europe through Viking invasions.
This exciting finding has led to new avenues in HIV research, including looking for drugs to block CCR5 binding to HIV in individuals who lack
the mutation. Although DNA testing to determine which individuals carry the CCR5-delta 32 mutation is possible, there are documented cases
of individuals homozygous for the mutation contracting HIV. For this reason, DNA testing for the mutation is not widely recommended by
public health officials so as not to encourage risky behavior in those who carry the mutation. Nevertheless, inhibiting the binding of HIV to
CCR5 continues to be a valid strategy for the development of drug therapies for those infected with HIV.
Back to the Top
12.9 References
1. World Health Organization. ” Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data, HIV/AIDS.“ http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/en/
(http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/en/). Accessed August 5, 2016. ↵ (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/chapter/mutations/#return-
footnote-99-2) (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/chapter/mutations/#return-footnote-99-3)
2. Parker, N., Schneegurt, M., Thi Tu, A-H., Lister, P., Forster, B.M. (2019) Microbiology. Openstax. Available at:
https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/ (https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/)
3. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, July 15). DNA oxidation. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 03:44, July 16, 2020,
from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DNA_oxidation&oldid=967811859 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=DNA_oxidation&oldid=967811859)
4. Wakim, S. and Grewal, M. (2020) Human Biology. Libretexts. Available at:
https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Human_Biology/Book%3A_Human_Biology_(Wakim_and_Grewal)
(https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Human_Biology/Book%3A_Human_Biology_(Wakim_and_Grewal))
5. Ahmad, A., Nay, S.L. and O’Conner, T.R. (2015) Chapter 4 Direct Reversal Repair in Mammalian Cells. Published through INTECH. Available
at: https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/48191.pdf (https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/48191.pdf)
6. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, April 20). AP site. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:15, July 23, 2020, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AP_site&oldid=952117602 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AP_site&oldid=952117602)
7. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, July 4). Benzo(a)pyrene. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 06:15, July 24, 2020, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benzo(a)pyrene&oldid=965990545 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Benzo(a)pyrene&oldid=965990545)
8. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, June 23). Pyrimidine dimer. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 06:54, July 24, 2020, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pyrimidine_dimer&oldid=964108515 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Pyrimidine_dimer&oldid=964108515)
9. Morimoto, S., Tsuda, M., Bunch, H., Sasanuma, H., Ausin, C. and Takeda, S. (2019) Type II DNA Topoisomerases Cause Spontaneous Double-
Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA. Genes 10:868. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336916880_Type_II_DNA_topoisomerases_cause_spontaneous_double-
strand_breaks_in_genomic_DNA/figures?lo=1
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336916880_Type_II_DNA_topoisomerases_cause_spontaneous_double-
strand_breaks_in_genomic_DNA/figures?lo=1)
10. Ding, L., Cao, J., Lin, W., Chen, H., Xiong, X., Ao, H., Yu, M., Lin, J., Cui, Q. (2020) The Roles of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cell-Cycle
Progression and Therapeutic Strategies in Human Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol Sci 21(6):1960. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-
0067/21/6/1960/htm (https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/6/1960/htm)
11. Verma, N., Franchitto, M., Zonfrilli, A., Cialfi, S., Palermo, R., and Talora, C. (2019) DNA Damage Stress: Cui Prodest? Int. J. Mol. Sci.
20(5):1073. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429504/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429504/)
12. Fukui, K. (2010) DNA Mismatch Repair in Eukaryotes and Bacteria. J. Nuc. Acids 260512. Available at:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jna/2010/260512/#copyright (https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jna/2010/260512/#copyright)
13. Petruseva, I.O., Evdokimov, A.N., and Lavrik, O.I. (2014) Molecular Mechanism of Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair. Acta Naturae
6(1):23-34. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999463/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999463/)
14. Decottingnies, A. (2013) Alternative end-joining mechanisms: A historical perspective. Frontiers in Genetics 4(48):48. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236129718_Alternative_end-joining_mechanisms_A_historical_perspective
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236129718_Alternative_end-joining_mechanisms_A_historical_perspective)
15. Vitor, A.C., Huertas, P., Legube, G., and de Almeida, S.F. (2020) Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: An Every-Growing Toolbox. Front.
Mol Biosci 7:24. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00024/full
(https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00024/full)
16. Krajewska, M., Fehrmann, R.S.N., de Vries, E.G.E., and van Vugt, A.A.T.M. (2015) Regulators of homologous recombination repair as novel
targets for cancer treatment. Front. Genet. 6:96. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2015.00096/full
(https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2015.00096/full)
Back to the Top
CH450 AND CH451: BIOCHEMISTRY – DEFINING LIFE AT THE MOLECULAR LEVEL (HTTPS://WOU.EDU/CHEMISTRY/COURSES/ONLINE-CHEMISTRY-
TEXTBOOKS/CH450-AND-CH451-BIOCHEMISTRY-DEFINING-LIFE-AT-THE-MOLECULAR-LEVEL/)
Tools Resources
Campus maps A-Z index
(https://wou.edu/resources/campus- (https://wou.edu/resources/a-z-
(https://www.facebook.com/WOUnews) map/) index/)
(https://www.instagram.com/westernoregonuniversity/) Canvas Accessibility
(https://wou.instructure.com) (https://wou.edu/accessibility/)
(https://twitter.com/westernoregonu)
Find people Academic calendar
(https://www.youtube.com/user/WOUnews) (https://wou.edu/resources/find- (https://wou.edu/registrar/calendars/acade
people/) calendar/)
(https://www2.wou.edu/nora/woutv.video.home)
Portal (https://wou.edu/portal/) Class schedule (https://ssb-
WOU email prod.ec.wou.edu/PROD/bwckschd.p_disp_d
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY (https://mail.google.com/a/mail.wou.edu) Jobs at WOU
345 Monmouth Ave. N.
Technical support (https://wou.edu/hr/employment/jobs/)
Monmouth OR 97361
(https://wou.edu/ucs/) Partnerships
503-838-8000 | 1-877-877-1593
(https://wou.edu/partnerships/)
Student services
(https://wou.edu/student/)